No, I'd fire my bank, and get one that wasn't retarded.
Please let me know if you figure out a way to do the same to GoDaddy and MySpace. Actually, never mind, since you don't understand the basic concepts involved, you're not likely to provide anything useful on that topic either.
Could anything happen at this point that even might help SCO? I really hope we get to move to the summary executions^Hjudgment phase here pretty soon...
Confirmation that you're an idiot just came through on the Samba mailing list:
-----Original Message----- From: samba-bounces+xxxxx=xxxxxxxxxx.com@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-bounces+xxxxx=xxxxxxxxxx.com@lists.s amba.org] On Behalf Of Jeremy Allison Sent: Monday, December 25, 2006 12:03 AM To: david rankin Cc: samba; opensuse Subject: Re: [Samba] Re: [opensuse] Open-source leader leaving Novell forGoogle
On Sun, Dec 24, 2006 at 11:11:18PM -0600, david rankin wrote: > Jesus, > > I hope it isn't true. But if it is, we will miss him dearly, both > here and very much so on the Samba list. However I can under stand and > respect the decision. Good luck and God speed Jeremy. Jerry, can you > pick up the slack?? An ill wind blows for us all as a result of the MS deal....
It's true I'm leaving Novell, but why do you think this means I'm not going to be on any Samba lists ? I'm joining Google on 2nd Jan, and believe me when I tell you they're *very* interested in me spending all my time on Samba:-):-).
As Herb once said to me, "Same job, different office":-):-).
Haha! Good one - you got me there. I happen to own a Burmese. It often behaves in, shall we say, quirky ways. It also has little or no rights, and is not even remotely sentient. If it were, I'd have thought twice before plunking down the $750US it cost me...
Ok... When your phone starts making that decision for you, on it's own, after thinking about it - let me know. We'll go find an appropriately large rock (to smash it with), on our way to the store to get you a replacement that doesn't think.:-)
Sure. And, despite it's one (?) major design flaw (the input port is too near the output ports) it's a huge success. Then again, from what I understand, the market isn't exactly free and open...
Who comes up with this stuff? Someone's been reading a bit too much Asimov. A better question is, under what possible set of circumstances would ANYONE market a product that would want to behave indepently from it's owners wishes? I'm betting that no robot is ever put together in such a way that this will be an issue.
That is the first, intelligent and well reasoned response I've seen yet. You make some very good points.
However, I think there is a fundamental difference between SCO and Novell. SCO was worthless from the word go. Novell was, and could again be, a good partner. It's going to be necessary to wack them with a clue stick repeatedly until they wake up.
Fair is fair, after all. More importantly, I want to see them enforce the spirit of the agreement - treat them the SAME as you would anyone who violates the GPL.
Slashdot Mirror
At a minimum, you kill the accounts, and move on. You don't start taking 3rd parties down because you can't be bothered to secure your own site.
I go by Scott, not William. William is either my oldest Son, or my dad, take your pick.
And, yes - I WILL be moving, not only LRSEhosting, but all of my domains off of GoDaddy as soon as I can pick a worthwhile replacement.
Do feel free to either suggest something useful, like a replacement registrar, or failing that, shut the fuck up.
No, I'd fire my bank, and get one that wasn't retarded.
Please let me know if you figure out a way to do the same to GoDaddy and MySpace. Actually, never mind, since you don't understand the basic concepts involved, you're not likely to provide anything useful on that topic either.
0) Take responsibility for your security being laughable, fire the people responsible, and secure your own shit before flinging it at others?
Hmmm.......
Pwned!
Could anything happen at this point that even might help SCO? I really hope we get to move to the summary executions^Hjudgment phase here pretty soon...
So, again, if I have paid for the right to listen to the music, what right do they have to restrict my right to them listen to that music?
#1: How much did you get for your soul from the RIAA/MPAA?
#2: I've heard Iowa is boring, but you are aware that there are other ways to get out of the state, right?
#3: Why do you hate America?
#4: Can you explain how anyone thought Sony's root kit was even remotely legal?
#5: Exactly how does your client's right to liscense their music trample my right as a consumer to listen to music I've paid for?
Confirmation that you're an idiot just came through on the Samba mailing list:
g [mailto:samba-bounces+xxxxx=xxxxxxxxxx.com@lists.s amba.org] On Behalf Of Jeremy Allison
:-) :-).
:-) :-).
-----Original Message-----
From: samba-bounces+xxxxx=xxxxxxxxxx.com@lists.samba.or
Sent: Monday, December 25, 2006 12:03 AM
To: david rankin
Cc: samba; opensuse
Subject: Re: [Samba] Re: [opensuse] Open-source leader leaving Novell forGoogle
On Sun, Dec 24, 2006 at 11:11:18PM -0600, david rankin wrote:
> Jesus,
>
> I hope it isn't true. But if it is, we will miss him dearly, both
> here and very much so on the Samba list. However I can under stand and
> respect the decision. Good luck and God speed Jeremy. Jerry, can you
> pick up the slack?? An ill wind blows for us all as a result of the MS deal....
It's true I'm leaving Novell, but why do you think this means I'm not going to be on any Samba lists ? I'm joining Google on 2nd Jan, and believe me when I tell you they're *very* interested in me spending all my time on Samba
As Herb once said to me, "Same job, different office"
Jeremy.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Or maybe, _Harry Potter, and the Pink part of Ginny Weasley_
I have 4.
Let me make one thing REALLY clear - Children are NOT a product to be marketed. They are the future. That's not even in the same league.
That reiserfs - what a killer file system!
See my other posts on the subject - I do own a cat. It's not really the same thing at all.
But, in this day and age, in our society, things like that are not mass produced unless there is commercial viability.
Haha! Good one - you got me there. I happen to own a Burmese. It often behaves in, shall we say, quirky ways. It also has little or no rights, and is not even remotely sentient. If it were, I'd have thought twice before plunking down the $750US it cost me...
Nor am I. However, I'd rather see it remain free, if the choice is eithercommercial viability or freedom.
Welcome to the real world. If we don't protect our own interests, who will?
I disagree. I have no doubt at all that he'll find another position with someone. IBM for example.
Ok... When your phone starts making that decision for you, on it's own, after thinking about it - let me know. We'll go find an appropriately large rock (to smash it with), on our way to the store to get you a replacement that doesn't think. :-)
Sure. And, despite it's one (?) major design flaw (the input port is too near the output ports) it's a huge success. Then again, from what I understand, the market isn't exactly free and open...
For you? Anything. Loved you in Revolution OS by the way!
Who comes up with this stuff? Someone's been reading a bit too much Asimov. A better question is, under what possible set of circumstances would ANYONE market a product that would want to behave indepently from it's owners wishes? I'm betting that no robot is ever put together in such a way that this will be an issue.
No, those are parting gifts.
lol - OUCH! Sorry to hear that!
That is the first, intelligent and well reasoned response I've seen yet. You make some very good points.
However, I think there is a fundamental difference between SCO and Novell. SCO was worthless from the word go. Novell was, and could again be, a good partner. It's going to be necessary to wack them with a clue stick repeatedly until they wake up.
Fair is fair, after all. More importantly, I want to see them enforce the spirit of the agreement - treat them the SAME as you would anyone who violates the GPL.