Romney will most likely either gut the internet, take out a massive loan on its assets to pay his management fee and then file bankruptcy on the internet, or sell it off to the (RI|MP)AA.
Santorum will most likely burn it at the stake for its perversion, witchcraft and the definition of Santorum.
The cowardly enemies of the US are the people who are abusing the system of secrecy to cover up crimes and embarrassing behavior. Exposing those coverups and those crimes when you know full well that you might be murdered for the act is heroic and very much in the spirit of ideals of democracy and justice that America is supposed to uphold. I am an American Patriot, and I support wikileaks. The first step in purging the corruption that has infected this great nation is to expose it and make the people aware.
The Vatican library contains the worlds largest collection of illegal porn and the financial records of the worlds most powerful for profit multinational corporation / religion.
Electronic payment records are already being recorded and data-mined by corporations for fun and profit. If every payment is electronic, every payment is traceable and every thing you ever pay for will be recorded, compiled and cross referenced. I really don't trust corporations or even my government that much.
Within the house, my suggestion is that the number of seats appointed to each state remains the same. But within that allotment, the seats are granted proportionally. For instance Texas would still have 36 seats and might fill 15 of them with Republicans, 10 with Democrats, 5 with Libertarians and 6 with the Republic of Texas party.
I don't really have an issue with the smaller states having more or less power. But with only 2 seats per state in the senate, I don't see a way to break the duopoly party power in the senate without a major change.
I see no reason for smaller states to wield a disproportionate amount of power at the federal level. Is there a more "acceptable", but no less effective, means of ensuring 3rd parties fill seats in the senate?
The states still have power based on on their population in the house. And I am not suggesting changing the senate to be like the house. I am suggesting the senate be changed to be more like a national parliament. Libertarians and Greens for instance may have 5% to 10% of the public interest, but they will almost never get in the senate under the current system. Under the system I suggest they would both win several seats.
It is my primary engine of change to break the stranglehold that the republican and democratic parties have on this country. I will grant that it is a major change, but major change may be necessary to reach that goal.
Transitioning away from the two party system does not mean tearing down government as a whole.
1: eliminate the electoral college, make it a pure vote. 2: eliminate first past the post elections. Use some form of Instant Runoff or range voting option. 3: Change the US senate to be proportional representation. No more 2 seats per state, instead each party gets a number of votes equal to their percentage in a national election rounded down. This gives other parties a fair chance at establishing themselves and influencing larger parties through coalition. 4: change the house so that each states seats are proportional, allowing for local growth of alternative parties. 5: eliminate anonymous political contributions over $5000. If corporations expect to scream during an election, they should be as identifiable as anyone else cheer leading for their cause with a bullhorn.
I am sure there is more that could be done, but that is where I would start.
You walk into the gaping hole in the wall of a casino or bank, walk up to the dude behind the counter and say "dude behind the counter, you got a giant gaping hole in your wall, maybe you should do something about that". And then you get arrested for the $200 dollars of damage that they have to repair now that they are aware of the giant gaping hole in the wall.
This also requires the teachers themselves to BE abstinent, even if they are married, having sex with their own spouse in the privacy of their own home would violate this law.
And if your wife/fiance really loves you as much as you love her, she shouldn't have a problem agreeing to not take everything you have and destroy you financially because she got the hots for some retard with a bass guitar and decided to destroy you emotionally.
And I think the idea that a woman gets half your shit for hanging around for 6 months is stupid. Prenup is the only way to go if you have any assets at all.
The other people who have suffered are those idiots who used those cyberlocker services to store and share their own data that they had every right to do so with.
You would be absolutely wrong if you count the hundreds of thousands of claims that insurance companies got out of paying in the aftermath of hurricane Katrina.
Slashdot Mirror
Obviously he shouldn't be using a petroleum based lubricant.
Indeed.
Romney will most likely either gut the internet, take out a massive loan on its assets to pay his management fee and then file bankruptcy on the internet, or sell it off to the (RI|MP)AA.
Santorum will most likely burn it at the stake for its perversion, witchcraft and the definition of Santorum.
The cowardly enemies of the US are the people who are abusing the system of secrecy to cover up crimes and embarrassing behavior. Exposing those coverups and those crimes when you know full well that you might be murdered for the act is heroic and very much in the spirit of ideals of democracy and justice that America is supposed to uphold. I am an American Patriot, and I support wikileaks. The first step in purging the corruption that has infected this great nation is to expose it and make the people aware.
The Vatican library contains the worlds largest collection of illegal porn and the financial records of the worlds most powerful for profit multinational corporation / religion.
Congress and Wall Street.
Electronic payment records are already being recorded and data-mined by corporations for fun and profit. If every payment is electronic, every payment is traceable and every thing you ever pay for will be recorded, compiled and cross referenced. I really don't trust corporations or even my government that much.
The list of countries I can go to that are neither 3rd world shit holes, police states, or both is becoming vanishingly small.
Within the house, my suggestion is that the number of seats appointed to each state remains the same. But within that allotment, the seats are granted proportionally. For instance Texas would still have 36 seats and might fill 15 of them with Republicans, 10 with Democrats, 5 with Libertarians and 6 with the Republic of Texas party.
I don't really have an issue with the smaller states having more or less power. But with only 2 seats per state in the senate, I don't see a way to break the duopoly party power in the senate without a major change.
I see no reason for smaller states to wield a disproportionate amount of power at the federal level. Is there a more "acceptable", but no less effective, means of ensuring 3rd parties fill seats in the senate?
The states still have power based on on their population in the house. And I am not suggesting changing the senate to be like the house. I am suggesting the senate be changed to be more like a national parliament. Libertarians and Greens for instance may have 5% to 10% of the public interest, but they will almost never get in the senate under the current system. Under the system I suggest they would both win several seats.
It is my primary engine of change to break the stranglehold that the republican and democratic parties have on this country. I will grant that it is a major change, but major change may be necessary to reach that goal.
I wouldn't eat them. All that tobacco smoke and petro dollars have to have spoiled the meat.
Transitioning away from the two party system does not mean tearing down government as a whole.
1: eliminate the electoral college, make it a pure vote.
2: eliminate first past the post elections. Use some form of Instant Runoff or range voting option.
3: Change the US senate to be proportional representation. No more 2 seats per state, instead each party gets a number of votes equal to their percentage in a national election rounded down. This gives other parties a fair chance at establishing themselves and influencing larger parties through coalition.
4: change the house so that each states seats are proportional, allowing for local growth of alternative parties.
5: eliminate anonymous political contributions over $5000. If corporations expect to scream during an election, they should be as identifiable as anyone else cheer leading for their cause with a bullhorn.
I am sure there is more that could be done, but that is where I would start.
Its a lot closer to this situation:
You walk into the gaping hole in the wall of a casino or bank, walk up to the dude behind the counter and say "dude behind the counter, you got a giant gaping hole in your wall, maybe you should do something about that". And then you get arrested for the $200 dollars of damage that they have to repair now that they are aware of the giant gaping hole in the wall.
This also requires the teachers themselves to BE abstinent, even if they are married, having sex with their own spouse in the privacy of their own home would violate this law.
And when it turns out she was a cheating slut who never really loved you anyway? What then?
The kind I shouldn't have spent 8 years of my life with.
And if your wife/fiance really loves you as much as you love her, she shouldn't have a problem agreeing to not take everything you have and destroy you financially because she got the hots for some retard with a bass guitar and decided to destroy you emotionally.
And I think the idea that a woman gets half your shit for hanging around for 6 months is stupid. Prenup is the only way to go if you have any assets at all.
I missed "with" on the first read through.
Distributing your own creative works IS a right, and it is being infringed upon by removing the medium of sharing in order to fight piracy.
The other people who have suffered are those idiots who used those cyberlocker services to store and share their own data that they had every right to do so with.
You would be absolutely wrong if you count the hundreds of thousands of claims that insurance companies got out of paying in the aftermath of hurricane Katrina.
Its a reference to their constant and unending desire to interfere with peoples sex lives.
I'll stand with both of them, easier to stab that way.
"Who are you to say that children don't deserve the opportunity to compete in the labor market!? Why do you hate children!?"
I wish that this wasn't a real thing that a real right wing politician has actually said. but it isn't.