statistically, street lamps would still prevent more crime.
Very true, and personally I feel the inherent risk to privacy and liberty that are associated with cctv more than negate any perceived safeties associated with them.
Alright, no need to be snarky. I was merely questioning the math based on your statements.
If I were to question you based on the articles you provide, I would use this quote: "In one month CCTV helped capture just eight out of 269 suspected robbers." Or this quote: "The internal police report found the million-plus cameras in London rarely help catch criminals."
Even this doesn't equal 10 crimes total. Met police say 1000 cameras to solve one crime, but they don't state over what amount of time. Per day? Per year? Per lifetime?
This does make more sense then what I had first thought, thank you for the clarification
That's per year. It's simple mathematics. Says in the article there are 10,000 cameras, It also says that 1 in 1000 crimes are solved by CCTV per year.
except you need to divide by total crimes, not total cameras. There were 33463 robberies alone last year, that makes 33 crimes per year solved by cameras right there.
But if you've encrypted the hard drive of your main computer, and you have to enter a password every time you start it... a jury isn't necessarily going to believe that you've suddenly conveniently 'forgotten it'.
Actually, sorry, the ultimate test for that is that Randi still has a 1 million dollars prize for whoever can demonstrate any paranormal abilities in a controlled setting. Aura reading does explicitly qualify, and has been tested ad nauseam before, only to turn out bunk every time.
Maybe the act of observing it destroys it's waveform
I copied the link provided into an address bar. First thing up is a (12 second to 16 second) commercial, every time. Whether it is the website or the station, intentional or not, it makes it appear as if you are being disingenuous. Just sayin'.
I see what you did there! You said he should have bought the white-walled tires, instead of the plain black ones if he wanted to have the +1 Ego boost.
Mine comes up with sinkmyship.com, so that's out. But it is'nt really complicated at all; keyword shortcuts are easy to set up for the power they offer. If you are using an actual search engine you type in the keyword and the search terms. that's it. If I want to search slashdot, ebay, craigslist, or any other standard search engine easy and often then setting the keyword to something simple is the best way to go. Check it out for yourself, just right click on the address bar...
I've got a cheat for you: Use the search engine list to make shortcuts! I created a Slashdot entry with the URL being slashdot.org. then I gave it the keyword "sd". Now I just hit sd and enter and Slashdot is pulled up immediately! You could use single letters if you prefer, but I have multiple shortcuts (GoogleMail, HotMail, etc) so its easier to use two letters for me.
Slashdot Mirror
C'mon dude, it's not that hard to throw in an amazon link.
Plagarism is the other tool. :)
This is constantly being discussed to death
I remembered it because it had one of my favorite comments
Unless future scientists are idiots, they'll likely realize that these are the best tools we have now.
i'm sure they will be using the same tools as us: Undergrads.
Just enough to complete a set of all sets that don't contain themselves.
Did someone say massive cash contract- err, I mean environmentally friendly resources? Count me in!
Signed,
Haliburton
[Citation Needed]
The price payed for a lawyer's education is just as ludicrous as the price they charge their clients.
It's the same walled garden that doctors have.
How is this insightful?
statistically, street lamps would still prevent more crime.
Very true, and personally I feel the inherent risk to privacy and liberty that are associated with cctv more than negate any perceived safeties associated with them.
Alright, no need to be snarky. I was merely questioning the math based on your statements.
If I were to question you based on the articles you provide, I would use this quote: "In one month CCTV helped capture just eight out of 269 suspected robbers." Or this quote: "The internal police report found the million-plus cameras in London rarely help catch criminals."
Even this doesn't equal 10 crimes total. Met police say 1000 cameras to solve one crime, but they don't state over what amount of time. Per day? Per year? Per lifetime?
This does make more sense then what I had first thought, thank you for the clarification
When you DO have socialism, the prick is FORCED to pay for the fire service that he doesn't want.
Funny, I hear him saying he wanted the service. If it worked the way you describe he should be saying "Thanks for letting it burn! The system works!"
That's per year. It's simple mathematics. Says in the article there are 10,000 cameras, It also says that 1 in 1000 crimes are solved by CCTV per year.
except you need to divide by total crimes, not total cameras. There were 33463 robberies alone last year, that makes 33 crimes per year solved by cameras right there.
But if you've encrypted the hard drive of your main computer, and you have to enter a password every time you start it... a jury isn't necessarily going to believe that you've suddenly conveniently 'forgotten it'.
I only started it the one time
You know you want to.
+1 inciteful
Actually, sorry, the ultimate test for that is that Randi still has a 1 million dollars prize for whoever can demonstrate any paranormal abilities in a controlled setting. Aura reading does explicitly qualify, and has been tested ad nauseam before, only to turn out bunk every time.
Maybe the act of observing it destroys it's waveform
00-de-ad-ba-be-00 is in the Highlands.
I copied the link provided into an address bar. First thing up is a (12 second to 16 second) commercial, every time. Whether it is the website or the station, intentional or not, it makes it appear as if you are being disingenuous. Just sayin'.
I see what you did there! You said he should have bought the white-walled tires, instead of the plain black ones if he wanted to have the +1 Ego boost.
Why? Is he going to cruise the miracle mile?
I don't wanna know what discount wholesaler you're getting your body parts from.
I do.
Your "ad free music station" is trying to sell me invisalign
Mine comes up with sinkmyship.com, so that's out. But it is'nt really complicated at all; keyword shortcuts are easy to set up for the power they offer. If you are using an actual search engine you type in the keyword and the search terms. that's it. If I want to search slashdot, ebay, craigslist, or any other standard search engine easy and often then setting the keyword to something simple is the best way to go. Check it out for yourself, just right click on the address bar...
I've got a cheat for you: Use the search engine list to make shortcuts! I created a Slashdot entry with the URL being slashdot.org. then I gave it the keyword "sd". Now I just hit sd and enter and Slashdot is pulled up immediately! You could use single letters if you prefer, but I have multiple shortcuts (GoogleMail, HotMail, etc) so its easier to use two letters for me.
This is the actual source article: http://www.bedfordshire-news.co.uk/News/Teen-is-banned-from-USA-over-Obama-hate-email.htm