The browsers should kept a log of my browsing activities. Remember what I have posted to where (which I expect answer or follow ups) and place them in a priority list. The email system should also pull up the reply mail to place in the top for my reading. The browser kept a cache and history but refuse us to arrange them for effective use.
A un-encrypted copy of any encrypted material should be kept in a safe archive in order to ensure it will be enter the public domain as required by law.
These archive can be kept in national archive or library.
The content can be used to make index to make it more accessable before it enter public domain.
I have just done that, I really want to see what it looks like.
Can any body help me finding it with Google? Are there any language I can describe my face in the search box? Any standard? Don't RT?M, because I have just google but found none that satisfy.
It is not httprequest is important. It is that render the layout in client with xslt.
The httprequest together with javascripts can provide the dynamic interface which is not exploited for most of you.
But what make ajax standout is to render the layout in browser (as well as in server). For example, when a user request a big document, the server just sent it to the browser: no paging is done in server, the paging is done in browser. Skip those ugly next, prev,...
More important, it works in text only and slim browsers: the xslt just got lost. The pure xml document is present.
Just one crack is enough? Or shall we wait for better crack? To find if the method have weakness, we should open for more easy crack forever.
The current scheme does not encourage a better crack. Or expose the method for fully tested.
It will be very dangerous if the I.T. security is based on such a weak test system. Especially when many policy maker buy these security protection without aware of full picture.
In the real world, people grant trust based on the information they got from the media, the more mentation these on the news, the more they will trust a system. It is extreamly danger. Especially when digital security is going mainstream.
Slashdot Mirror
Sony can
1. Try really hard to pull more power from the cell, make it on time for a killing game before the market abandon ps3.
2. Admit it a failure. Then quickly recover with PS4 (or PS2+).
Prolong a failing war is damn dead wrong!!!
I just want to know how and when I can place a bookmark before I finish reading and re-open at the same page when I came back from reality.
The title say that. IT is already no secret that all IT products were crackable, design with short comings, bad tastes. And all IT guys were GOD.
Remove the phone module, open it up.
Check what N800, that is what You should have, Jobs.
The browsers should kept a log of my browsing activities. Remember what I have posted to where (which I expect answer or follow ups) and place them in a priority list. The email system should also pull up the reply mail to place in the top for my reading. The browser kept a cache and history but refuse us to arrange them for effective use.
When computers doing a simple role the OS will become a wasted.
Free Software is about Freedom. GPL is about restriction.
Love people, no hate. Love money do not hate.
Make sure they put an RFID tag inside every one.
as subject.
I would like to confirm if this guy have GreaseMonkey or any proxy installed.
Or hacking the browser himself would be safer.
They can not maintain it. They drop it already!
Total failure!!!!
Hey, do not think about this again!
They will follow your model. Do not make them your clone (yes, they are already were). The should have their own life.
Run on Linux!
Such a simple fact make Linux a better runner than OSX.
Beside, OSX is slow!
If you do not publish your work, no protection.
The current law give many power to copyright holder. They can ban others to access the information.
Copyright law should only protect their interest, not allow them to block access.
GPL is not a free license. It put a lots of restriction which others hard to comply.
Making information free should also a goal for copyright law. Make everybody have access the informaiton they need.
Copyright law should encourage people to make new information base on other information they have access.
It is important to ensure others to have rights to index the content as fair use.
It is also important to ensure linking to content (depth link) as fair use.
The copyright law should make access to information easy, that is the goal of it.
A un-encrypted copy of any encrypted material should be kept in a safe archive in order to ensure it will be enter the public domain as required by law.
These archive can be kept in national archive or library.
The content can be used to make index to make it more accessable before it enter public domain.
Come on, Slashdot.
We want fun!
We do not want only Apple I news. Can you pass something else along?
I have just done that, I really want to see what it looks like.
Can any body help me finding it with Google? Are there any language I can describe my face in the search box? Any standard? Don't RT?M, because I have just google but found none that satisfy.
Thanks in advance.
Hope you all get a good time. Until next.
It is not httprequest is important. It is that render the layout in client with xslt.
...
The httprequest together with javascripts can provide the dynamic interface which is not exploited for most of you.
But what make ajax standout is to render the layout in browser (as well as in server). For example, when a user request a big document, the server just sent it to the browser: no paging is done in server, the paging is done in browser. Skip those ugly next, prev,
More important, it works in text only and slim browsers: the xslt just got lost. The pure xml document is present.
I hope I coule use Generate algorithms to find out the best scheduler for the system.
BUT Tapes outdate very soon
The center of the jamming signals were possible the target.
Just one crack is enough? Or shall we wait for better crack? To find if the method have weakness, we should open for more easy crack forever.
The current scheme does not encourage a better crack. Or expose the method for fully tested.
It will be very dangerous if the I.T. security is based on such a weak test system. Especially when many policy maker buy these security protection without aware of full picture.
In the real world, people grant trust based on the information they got from the media, the more mentation these on the news, the more they will trust a system. It is extreamly danger. Especially when digital security is going mainstream.