It's common in contracts with CLECs to do the cancelation fee - the thing is, there's a clause that says that when it expires, it renews for a new term of the same length (so 1 year in your case) unless you tell them otherwise (and you can, most allow you to go to month-to-month, but you have to tell them this when the contract's ABOUT to be but NOT YET expired). I'm dealing with that at my work, myself.
Yes, I think they call that Palladium, or NGSCB. Microsoft has said that in addition to securing the OS, they want to be able to ensure that appropriate peripherals, such as keyboards, are coming direct to the OS..
I think the idea here is that the user could install a program to their "My Programs" folder - much like how when you run./configure under [li|u]nix, you can pass --prefix=~ to install it in your own personal directory instead of system wide. May increase disk space requirements, but I personally would love it - each user can install their own software without affecting each other - great for terminal services environments... (IMHO)
Um, this article in no way indicates that blacks are the cause of the AIDS epidemic, just that they are more affected by it then others (ie. whites). Which, given the lower average pay for blacks vs. whites is no surprise (medicine costs money in the US). A "liberal" agenda is not necessary to see these facts, but a racist "crackpot" will easily see just what they want.
Which is MUCH better, the export.bml only exports a month at a time, if you've been using LJ for any length of time, backing up each month one at a time is a pain...
Actually, on private property you can speed however much you like - speed limits ONLY apply on public land. (Of course, the owner of the private land can set speed limits, but if you own the land, you can go as fast as you want, just don't take off or you'll be in the FAA's jurisdiction...)
Um... trojan'ed machines won't match the SPF filter record, and will be rejected. I'm already reaping some benefits, as most viruses sent to us "appear" to come from our business partners - as they've started to deploy SPF records, we're seeing the # of virus emails go down as they get rejected. I understand that SPF has some issues, particularly with forwarding, but sometimes you have to break an egg to make an omelet.
Ah, but most BUSINESSes, on the other hand, don't have to use their ISP's smtp server. I go with McLeod, we don't have to, and my mother's work (which is a 3 person operation and T1 line, in the middle of no where, that's all you can get) goes through XO/Allegiance, and they don't require it there either. Of course, SPF really only works if you have a valid IP too... So home users will be screwed anyways.
Yeah, I can. Windows does this (the share has overriding ACL, and then the filesystem can have one, the more restictive wins). This is nice for having a mirrored directory that is read only, but the FS ACLs are still there, because the share is set read only, which in fact is now W2K3's default for new shares. Or you can set the share read-write, but not allow administration of ACLs on it (for clueless users).
A folder that the Accounting group needs read access, the Accounting-Heads group needs read-write access, and the IS group needs ownership (all) access. Oh, and no one else can see the folder. Two groups are a classic ACL issue. Two users can be, too, if you want to assign rights and you're not root (so you can't create groups).
Actually, perhaps we should **accelerate** this. From my understanding of Political Science class, governments don't usually last more than 200-300 years. After that time, the government is so restrictive that the citizens revolt, and a new government is established, of course with a period of anarchy. So, we're just ready to have a nice, restrictive government. Ready for mayhem?
Mutt's UI is horrible. I can view my inbox, but how, just how do I get to other folders? I couldn't figure it out. Pines UI, OTOH, is VERY easy to use. I love it. I couldn't figure out mutt, it doesnt even tell you ON THE SCREEN what keypresses are available. Argh! Give me a menu-driver CLI anyday...
At my work, we'd love to move to linux. We may have to, anyways, due to government budget cuts. However, the difference between MS-SQL and MySQL or PostgreSQL is HUGE. No enterprise manager is the biggest thing, for us. Lack of triggers, cross-database query support. It'll suck, big time.
As far as calendaring, we used a 3rd party sync program for Outlook. Was very buggy, so we just recently (earlier this month) installed Exchange, and everything works, easily. Even my boss has admitted, it wasn't the IMAP, it was that the CEO wants to see calendars, and that requires outlook (no, Evolution doesn't SHARE calendars. It doesn't even speak iCalendar).
Actually, there is already a backlash against constant upgrades. How many people have actually deployed XP? How about at work? What? You're running 98 (okay, you're probably running linux, but it's RedHat 6, right?!).
People ARE getting tired of being FORCED to upgrade every year. Sure, boys like their toys, on THEIR timescale, not MS's/BMI's/RIAA's...
Not me. A project I started, geheimnis (for kde) was recently chosen to be added to the main kde base. However, the primary guy complained that the license dialog I had wasn't even legal in germany (probably quite true), and it should be removed. The SSSCA (or whatever it's called) will make it in the USA so that I have accountability, unless there's a license that removes it, and the user has to accept the license to use the software. I had to keep the license dialog in there, because *I* live in the US, and *I* could be held responsible. I think that, should the SSSCA and it's more evil cousins see the light of day, open source will be dead. Plain and simple.
Is there are *free*, open-source, enterprise-level backup program? At one point I thought of starting one, but I'm not that good. I kinda like ArcServe on my netware and NT servers, but Linux really needs something better than BRU or Arcadia [sic?]. Shell scripts barely pass muster, IMHO...
It's not that easy. Really. I code geheimnis (see freshmeat.net/appindex), and I try to wrap around PGP 2, PGP 5, PGP 6, and GPG. Except for GPG, it's hard to wrap around a CLI-based program, since they're relatively one-dimensional and aren't designed for it. GPG's actually pretty good as far as being nice to other programs. Perhaps other programs should look at how Werner did it in GPG, because otherwise writing a GUI-wrapper for a CLI-program is like writing a Web wrapper around a CLI-app - a pain in the arse!
That's why the Release Packs will help. you can have a "basic Debian" pack with a few hundred packages, just your basic stuff; a "developer Debian" with lots of developer stuff; and a "everything-under-the-sun Debian" with everything. Sounds really great, I think I'll finally switch back from RedHat (those long release cycles scared my boss away...)
Only for Whindoze Developement!
on
KDE 1.1.2 is out
·
· Score: 1
No, with this, there's a pool of IPs that the server can hand out - first come, first serve. Your setup is that for each machine, there is one IP, they're just too lazy to set it up entirely. With real DHCP, you can have 60 IPs and 30 machines, however, only 30 machines can be *on* at once... This just intergrates DNS into the equation, which kinda sounds nice... (we're primarily NT at my work w/ a little UNIX).
I, personally, *like* QT/KDE. It makes programming GUI programs in C++ much easier. I'd like GTK+ to have something like it (with the attendant QString equivalent!). Sadly, it's also slow on my 486, and if it's slow there, well, maybe some work needs to go into making it faster....
Can't we make a client that runs under say GTK and/or QT that does AIM, ICQ, Yahoo!, Excite's thing, *and* Microsoft's thing? It'd be better than having 4-5 windows open just to talk to people....
Slashdot Mirror
Well then, if lower UIDs is any indication, I should be a G-d! (Yeah, it'll get modded down, but I don't live for SlashDot karma.)
It's common in contracts with CLECs to do the cancelation fee - the thing is, there's a clause that says that when it expires, it renews for a new term of the same length (so 1 year in your case) unless you tell them otherwise (and you can, most allow you to go to month-to-month, but you have to tell them this when the contract's ABOUT to be but NOT YET expired). I'm dealing with that at my work, myself.
Yes, I think they call that Palladium, or NGSCB. Microsoft has said that in addition to securing the OS, they want to be able to ensure that appropriate peripherals, such as keyboards, are coming direct to the OS..
I think the idea here is that the user could install a program to their "My Programs" folder - much like how when you run ./configure under [li|u]nix, you can pass --prefix=~ to install it in your own personal directory instead of system wide. May increase disk space requirements, but I personally would love it - each user can install their own software without affecting each other - great for terminal services environments... (IMHO)
Um, this article in no way indicates that blacks are the cause of the AIDS epidemic, just that they are more affected by it then others (ie. whites). Which, given the lower average pay for blacks vs. whites is no surprise (medicine costs money in the US). A "liberal" agenda is not necessary to see these facts, but a racist "crackpot" will easily see just what they want.
http://www.livejournal.com/~elfric/109220.html
Which is MUCH better, the export.bml only exports a month at a time, if you've been using LJ for any length of time, backing up each month one at a time is a pain...
Actually, on private property you can speed however much you like - speed limits ONLY apply on public land. (Of course, the owner of the private land can set speed limits, but if you own the land, you can go as fast as you want, just don't take off or you'll be in the FAA's jurisdiction...)
Um... trojan'ed machines won't match the SPF filter record, and will be rejected. I'm already reaping some benefits, as most viruses sent to us "appear" to come from our business partners - as they've started to deploy SPF records, we're seeing the # of virus emails go down as they get rejected. I understand that SPF has some issues, particularly with forwarding, but sometimes you have to break an egg to make an omelet.
Ah, but most BUSINESSes, on the other hand, don't have to use their ISP's smtp server. I go with McLeod, we don't have to, and my mother's work (which is a 3 person operation and T1 line, in the middle of no where, that's all you can get) goes through XO/Allegiance, and they don't require it there either. Of course, SPF really only works if you have a valid IP too... So home users will be screwed anyways.
Yeah, I can. Windows does this (the share has overriding ACL, and then the filesystem can have one, the more restictive wins). This is nice for having a mirrored directory that is read only, but the FS ACLs are still there, because the share is set read only, which in fact is now W2K3's default for new shares. Or you can set the share read-write, but not allow administration of ACLs on it (for clueless users).
A folder that the Accounting group needs read access, the Accounting-Heads group needs read-write access, and the IS group needs ownership (all) access. Oh, and no one else can see the folder. Two groups are a classic ACL issue. Two users can be, too, if you want to assign rights and you're not root (so you can't create groups).
Actually, perhaps we should **accelerate** this. From my understanding of Political Science class, governments don't usually last more than 200-300 years. After that time, the government is so restrictive that the citizens revolt, and a new government is established, of course with a period of anarchy. So, we're just ready to have a nice, restrictive government. Ready for mayhem?
Mutt's UI is horrible. I can view my inbox, but how, just how do I get to other folders? I couldn't figure it out. Pines UI, OTOH, is VERY easy to use. I love it. I couldn't figure out mutt, it doesnt even tell you ON THE SCREEN what keypresses are available. Argh! Give me a menu-driver CLI anyday...
At my work, we'd love to move to linux. We may have to, anyways, due to government budget cuts. However, the difference between MS-SQL and MySQL or PostgreSQL is HUGE. No enterprise manager is the biggest thing, for us. Lack of triggers, cross-database query support. It'll suck, big time.
As far as calendaring, we used a 3rd party sync program for Outlook. Was very buggy, so we just recently (earlier this month) installed Exchange, and everything works, easily. Even my boss has admitted, it wasn't the IMAP, it was that the CEO wants to see calendars, and that requires outlook (no, Evolution doesn't SHARE calendars. It doesn't even speak iCalendar).
Actually, there is already a backlash against constant upgrades. How many people have actually deployed XP? How about at work? What? You're running 98 (okay, you're probably running linux, but it's RedHat 6, right?!).
People ARE getting tired of being FORCED to upgrade every year. Sure, boys like their toys, on THEIR timescale, not MS's/BMI's/RIAA's...
Not me. A project I started, geheimnis (for kde) was recently chosen to be added to the main kde base. However, the primary guy complained that the license dialog I had wasn't even legal in germany (probably quite true), and it should be removed. The SSSCA (or whatever it's called) will make it in the USA so that I have accountability, unless there's a license that removes it, and the user has to accept the license to use the software. I had to keep the license dialog in there, because *I* live in the US, and *I* could be held responsible. I think that, should the SSSCA and it's more evil cousins see the light of day, open source will be dead. Plain and simple.
Is there are *free*, open-source, enterprise-level backup program? At one point I thought of starting one, but I'm not that good. I kinda like ArcServe on my netware and NT servers, but Linux really needs something better than BRU or Arcadia [sic?]. Shell scripts barely pass muster, IMHO...
It's not that easy. Really. I code geheimnis (see freshmeat.net/appindex), and I try to wrap around PGP 2, PGP 5, PGP 6, and GPG. Except for GPG, it's hard to wrap around a CLI-based program, since they're relatively one-dimensional and aren't designed for it. GPG's actually pretty good as far as being nice to other programs. Perhaps other programs should look at how Werner did it in GPG, because otherwise writing a GUI-wrapper for a CLI-program is like writing a Web wrapper around a CLI-app - a pain in the arse!
That's why the Release Packs will help. you can have a "basic Debian" pack with a few hundred packages, just your basic stuff; a "developer Debian" with lots of developer stuff; and a "everything-under-the-sun Debian" with everything. Sounds really great, I think I'll finally switch back from RedHat (those long release cycles scared my boss away...)
For linux, it's FREE.
No, with this, there's a pool of IPs that the server can hand out - first come, first serve. Your setup is that for each machine, there is one IP, they're just too lazy to set it up entirely. With real DHCP, you can have 60 IPs and 30 machines, however, only 30 machines can be *on* at once... This just intergrates DNS into the equation, which kinda sounds nice... (we're primarily NT at my work w/ a little UNIX).
I, personally, *like* QT/KDE. It makes programming GUI programs in C++ much easier. I'd like GTK+ to have something like it (with the attendant QString equivalent!). Sadly, it's also slow on my 486, and if it's slow there, well, maybe some work needs to go into making it faster....
Can't we make a client that runs under say GTK and/or QT that does AIM, ICQ, Yahoo!, Excite's thing, *and* Microsoft's thing? It'd be better than having 4-5 windows open just to talk to people....