Slashdot Mirror


LiveJournal Buyout Confirmed

Kingfox writes "Brad Fitzpatrick, creator of LiveJournal, finally confirms the story that was posted to Slashdot yesterday. Six Apart has purchased Danga. This means that they're moving to San Francisco, LiveJournal users are finally getting the trackback feature, but the project will stay open source, and little else will change for the end user."

223 comments

  1. Changes by tuxter · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They aren't going to raise their prices OR make any other significant changes other than "look and feel" i.e. make it prettier. I wonder how long the "No price changes" will last, I'm willing to bet not long.

    1. Re:Changes by BumpyCarrot · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually, they were planning on never ever changing their prices, not ever. If they do, you should sue! Oh hell yes.

      --
      Do you see what I did there?
    2. Re:Changes by somethinghollow · · Score: 4, Interesting

      One thing I hope they change is getting more / faster servers. That site is really slow. Sadly, all my friends blog on it. So, I have to brave the slowness every once in awhile.

      Another thing that I hope they change, though it has no bearing on me since I don't blog there, is their theme system. It's pretty convoluted to learn. I don't know why they don't just let you use CSS. 90% of the custom themes I've seen could be done with the right HTML and some CSS. At least then after you spent hours working on your LJ page with CSS, you could use it in the "real world." After learning LJ formatting, all you can do is format LJ (AFAIK).

    3. Re:Changes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I heard they might be forced to liquidate ...IN FRANCE!

    4. Re:Changes by NeoChaosX · · Score: 3, Insightful

      One thing I hope they change is getting more / faster servers. That site is really slow. Sadly, all my friends blog on it. So, I have to brave the slowness every once in awhile.

      Agree here. If I had a nickel for everytime the server timed out on me or I ran into a "The document does not exist" error while surfing LJ, I'd probably have enough to keep a Paid LJ account for life. They need to get more bandwidth, faster server, or both.

      --
      One man's selflessness is another man's annoyance.
    5. Re:Changes by Jamie+Zawinski · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's only slow if you don't have a paid account. I agree that their theme systems (both of them) are totally from hell.

    6. Re:Changes by mrjackson2000 · · Score: 1

      they just upgraded their load balancers to take full advantage of the 1000mps pipe they upgraded to recently. and only 7% of users are still on 'slow' servers, things have gotten much better over the past year or so, i just hope this buyout wont affect anything

    7. Re:Changes by LegionX · · Score: 1

      Maybe that's the 7% that actually blogs :)

    8. Re:Changes by cetan · · Score: 1

      "Pretty Convoluted" isn't the half of it. It's down-right horrible. I mean it's probably perfect if you're a CS major, but I'm guessing 5.6 million users are not all CS majors.

      As for the speed; paid users get ahead in the queue and the site is quite fast.

      --
      In Soviet Russia...michael would be rotting in Siberia!
    9. Re:Changes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OSS is not possible because we can't escape our human nature.

      astroturfer. go suck ballmer's dick some more.

  2. Little will change...? by JediLow · · Score: 3, Funny

    Sure, just like they weren't being bought...

    1. Re:Little will change...? by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 1

      Nobody said they weren't being bought, at least nobody official.

      --
      ± 29 dB
    2. Re:Little will change...? by BWJones · · Score: 1

      More specifically, Six Apart purchased LiveJournal because of each companies respective strengths and weaknesses and because LiveJournals user base would complement Six Aparts business model by getting access to a younger user base. All that and the owner of LiveJournal was looking to sell. Read Mena's (President of Six Apart) blog for specifics and a handy FAQ.

      --
      Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    3. Re:Little will change...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe they couldn't resist a 3 number figure :P

  3. Ads already in place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    People are already reporting ads on LJ, even for paid users: http://www.livejournal.com/users/girlvinyl/178809. html

    1. Re:Ads already in place by Tink2000 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Er, did you bother to go look at her references?

      It's quite clear (especially if you actually go look at the pages she cites) that she's been spywared.

    2. Re:Ads already in place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then she's not the only one to get spyware, are you sure you're right? http://www.livejournal.com/community/lasvegas/5968 36.html

    3. Re:Ads already in place by Tink2000 · · Score: 1

      Don't see it there, either.

      And if anyone is gonna see ads, it's me. I have WinXPPro & use MSIE 6 (patched and locked down, but still...)

      Ran Ad-aware lately?

    4. Re:Ads already in place by BenSpinSpace · · Score: 2, Informative

      The person reporting the ads seems to be the only person seeing them. Therefore, "Person" is reporting ads, not "People." And it could very well be spyware.

      The people running LiveJournal seem to be quite aware of an average user's worries about the project; hell, Brad Fitzpatrick himself seems to be one of the crowd who has chosen specifically not to sell his soul to the devil. RTFA to hear what he's actually saying. As he says, "Really you shouldn't see any negative changes." The LiveJournal operators wouldn't violate this statement within moments of its being posted!

      Viewing these changes in LiveJournal as positive things may seem bleak at first, but these advancements require a bit of faith. There will always be people to decry every bit of progress as "turning to the dark side," but I, for one, have faith in several of my favorite Internet organizations: Slashdot, LiveJournal, Something Awful, Google, and Amazon, to name several. Usually even their most questionable steps eventually wind up in the bounds of smart thinking and usually good taste.

    5. Re:Ads already in place by Tink2000 · · Score: 1

      And if what you and Brad say wasn't enough, there's always Six Apart's own statement:
      "Q. What is going to happen to LiveJournal and its current users?

      A. We acquired LiveJournal because we like LiveJournal just the way it is -- it's an awesome product. We will invest in the further development of LiveJournal and help it expand its reach around the globe but our plans do not include removing the free level, plastering the sites with ads, owning user content, etc... We think the LiveJournal community is unique and vibrant. We welcome LiveJournal users to the Six Apart family, and promise to keep the LiveJournal culture and quality which has earned their devotion. "
      (full text here)

      But then again this is /., where everyone jumps to assumptions without RingTFA. Or using the product, for that matter.

    6. Re:Ads already in place by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      "The LiveJournal operators wouldn't violate this statement within moments of its being posted!"

      Right, but what I'm concerned about is their Privacy Policy. Since legally (and yes, IANAL) wouldn't the old owners have absolutely no say whatsoever what happens to the users information? Whats to stop these people from deciding one year down the line "hey, revenue is down, we need more money, lets sell our user lists to advertisers"?

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    7. Re:Ads already in place by Valar · · Score: 1

      Well, it does say that you will have the choice (starting in a few days) whether or not you want to accept the new privacy policy. They are posting in advance for you to review. If you disagree with the new policy, you have time to move somewhere else.

    8. Re:Ads already in place by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 1

      Actually, it said you will *have* to agree to the new policies in order to log in. The new stuff is non-optional.

      --
      ± 29 dB
    9. Re:Ads already in place by the+angry+liberal · · Score: 1

      Right, but what I'm concerned about is their Privacy Policy. Since legally (and yes, IANAL) wouldn't the old owners have absolutely no say whatsoever what happens to the users information? Whats to stop these people from deciding one year down the line "hey, revenue is down, we need more money, lets sell our user lists to advertisers"?

      If you weren't aware, the original owners of LJ could do the same thing, and without notifying you?

      Keep in mind, even when you set up your slashdot accounts: Don't expect any website to stay in business forever. Also don't expect any information you post on said website to remain private.

      Actually, why am I saying this? This is Internet 101, dude.

      What will cause me to laugh hard enough to run into blood pressure problems: When Google hits hard times and sells Gmail off to another Hotmail or Yahoo. Yes, troll karma on this site. But, no matter how cool you think it is, it is part of the "ever changing face" of the Internet.

    10. Re:Ads already in place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is there a um... link to this privacy policy?

      I use the "text" theme to LJ, and it's really nice not to have all the pages filled up with fancy-looking gobbedly-gook, but, frequently, it won't have links to things that have links on the standard-livejournal-theme frontpage.

      I hope the text theme doesn't go away. I hope nothing in my journal breaks (and, yes, I use the *old, old* style system, and I like CSS, but I'm not eager to have to fiddle with making my journal look roughly the same with a new style system).

      I'm also a bit concerned about the (slight) change of management and the privacy stuff. I also don't like how LJ is getting big enough that everyone and their mother knows about it... I kind-of liked being able to have a public-ish weblog, where I was fairly open about who I was, and not have to worry if my grandparents were going to call me up to complain that I used some language they didn't like, or talked about my sex life or something. (My family is pretty conservative and Puritanical.)

      I've changed all my old posts to friends-only already (except for the innocuous ones), set up a diaryland blog that has absolutely no reference to my real identity, and taken great care to protect what I say and who gets to hear about it. But, still. I should just set up my own damn blog on my own damn webserver, except for the fact that you can't read your friends' non-public posts on such-and-such journaling site without having an account there, yadda yadda yadda.

    11. Re:Ads already in place by jisatsusha · · Score: 1

      "The person reporting the ads seems to be the only person seeing them. Therefore, "Person" is reporting ads, not "People." And it could very well be spyware." Not spyware, but I've seen cases where some ISPs have teamed up with ad providers to insert ads randomly into pages, that's probably what that was.

    12. Re:Ads already in place by afd8856 · · Score: 1

      Maybe AOL with their proxy systems, but I can't imagine why would a regular ISP highjack the html stream to insert their own content (not imposible, just unbelievable).

      Having said that, I get close to 0 ads just by using firefox (no special extension) and privoxy (privoxy.org).

      --
      I'll do the stupid thing first and then you shy people follow...
    13. Re:Ads already in place by afd8856 · · Score: 1

      A! I forgot. To be able to insert banners into a page while proxying the page you would have first to load the entire page and then modify the page. (This is the mechanism used by privoxy). This would result in the end user waiting some time for the page to start loading, and at least this would not go unnoticed and would be seen as a degradation in the quality of service.

      --
      I'll do the stupid thing first and then you shy people follow...
    14. Re:Ads already in place by jisatsusha · · Score: 1

      "Maybe AOL with their proxy systems, but I can't imagine why would a regular ISP highjack the html stream to insert their own content (not imposible, just unbelievable)."

      Aparently it's a company called Adzilla. Quote:
      "Problem iss solve-d. ISP tells me that this is intentional, and just something being tested. Company called Adzilla has software for ISPs that can insert custom content into specific pages, so ISPs can do things like sell very cheap broadband, with the cost supplemented by their own targetted banner ads on pages."

    15. Re:Ads already in place by elemental23 · · Score: 1

      Read her replies to comments in her own LJ, as well as the journals she provides links to. It's pretty obviously a hoax intended to stir up panic and knee-jerk reactions among the more gullible LJ users.

      Note that said LJ poster is also involved with the now-offline LJDrama.org and Encyclopedia Dramatica (current front page NSFW). Take it all with a nice, big grain of salt.

      --
      I like my women like my coffee... pale and bitter.
    16. Re:Ads already in place by Betelgeuse · · Score: 1

      (current front page NSFW)

      Ahhhh! Please SPELL OUT the important acronyms. So other people won't have the panicked clicking-to-close-windows that I just had:

      NSFW = Not Safe For work

      --
      I couldn't tell if you were experimenting with poor-man's cryogenics or looking for the orange sherbet.
    17. Re:Ads already in place by srcosmo · · Score: 1
      Usually even their most questionable steps eventually wind up in the bounds of smart thinking and usually good taste.
      Well, except for Something Awful..
      --
      free speach
      Did you mean: free speech
    18. Re:Ads already in place by arose · · Score: 1

      More power to https!

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    19. Re:Ads already in place by Ghost429 · · Score: 1
      --
      I already know i'm going to hell, now i'm just trying to get cable down there.
  4. Thank goodness for TrackBack by FleaPlus · · Score: 5, Interesting

    TrackBack is a damned handy system, which lets you see which other blogs have linked to a particular post that you've made. It's seen in many of the more "professional" blogs, and it's a great tool for finding out about commentary on your posts. I was actually thinking of ditching LiveJournal for a service which supported TrackBack, but I guess I'll now be able to stick around.

    1. Re:Thank goodness for TrackBack by AndroidCat · · Score: 1, Funny

      And all trackback and blogging can be replaced with Usenet. (Over UUCP like in the good days!)

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    2. Re:Thank goodness for TrackBack by FleaPlus · · Score: 1

      The same thing can be done using already existing systems, like, say, posting a comment on the blog website

      So every time somebody makes a post in response to a post I've made, I have to assume that they're also going to take the time to comment in my blog about it?

      or checking referrer logs.

      I can do this on LiveJournal?

    3. Re:Thank goodness for TrackBack by pixelcort · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but PingBack is somewhat better, in my opinion.

      First, Pingback uses an extra header on the document, versus the extra XML embedded into the document for Trackbacks. Second, Pingbacks have no discription provided by the pinger. The trick here is that the pingee checks the URL to ensure that there indeed is a link to its page, and while its at it, it grabs some text around the link.

      --
      http://pixelcort.com/
    4. Re:Thank goodness for TrackBack by blowdart · · Score: 1
      Of course it's all dependant on the other blog pinging you anyway. If someone links to a LiveJournal from a blogger site does blogger search the post and send ping backs? msn spaces? das blog? Nope.

      Ping/track back is nice, but unless it's automatic on the backend and does not require the blog user to do anything it's as useful as a chocolate teapot.

    5. Re:Thank goodness for TrackBack by atriusofbricia · · Score: 1

      Conviently enough, TrackBack is probably the main reason a lot of people hate what weblogs are doing to google. As has been said by others google was not designed to deal with a billion people linking around to each other. It's as bad as intentional google spamming and all other forms of spam.

      --
      I was raised on the command line, bitch

      "Nemo me impune lacesset"

    6. Re:Thank goodness for TrackBack by Minwee · · Score: 1
      Putting a giant aluminum spoiler on the back of your Honda Civic along with a set of purple lights under the body and a "Type R" sticker on the back is a damned handy modification. It's done by many of the more "professional" automotive enthusiasts and it's a great tool for making your car go faster.

      Hmm. Somehow saying that doesn't make it any more true either. Endless "trackback" listings are still the annoying Type R stickers of the Internet.

    7. Re:Thank goodness for TrackBack by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

      >It's as bad as intentional google spamming

      No. Something that is unintentional is never as "bad" as something that is intentional. If google can't handle the modern web, then a competitor should take its place. Expecting publishers to bow down to google's limitations is ridiculous.

    8. Re:Thank goodness for TrackBack by atriusofbricia · · Score: 1
      I wouldn't say something unintentional is never as bad as something intentional. There are a great man cases where that is not true. But, that is outside of this discussion. In any case, we aren't talking about people who are publishing things. We are talking about a God forsaken "feature" of a particular class of weblog software.

      Trackback is evil. If you want to make a link to someone, make a link, don't use some horrible virus-like autolinking system. It's just as annoying as those bloody link farms. And for the most part just as useless. I'm glad you enjoy your weblog. At least I assume you do anyway. But, when I go searching for some topic, I don't want to find some person's weblog that for some reason a million people hit the trackback button.

      I have to go with the suggestion another person made, there needs to be a BLOG meta-tag so that they can be properly ignored at the users discretion.

      --
      I was raised on the command line, bitch

      "Nemo me impune lacesset"

    9. Re:Thank goodness for TrackBack by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      The problem isn't that blogs show up in the results - clearly they must have some relevance to be there in the first place, and sometimes a blog entry may contain what you are actually looking for - it's that they may sometimes be overrated in the listings due to all the linking.

      So I feel that fixing the rating system that Google uses is preferable to ignoring blogs altogether.

      And yes, the option to remove blogs for a search result would be useful, but this would be useful for all sorts of things on the web - eg, sometimes I find forum posts popping up in search results, when that's not what I want. But relying on META tags reminds me of the bad old days of search engines, when they relied on the website to be honest about describing their site. No one is going to include a tag that removes them from search results (unless they don't want to be searched at all, but then they'll use the "no robots" stuff).

    10. Re:Thank goodness for TrackBack by atriusofbricia · · Score: 1
      You're right on the META tag question. Given that, for the most part, webloggers are craving at least some form of attention, the odds that they would insert a tag that would limit that attention are slim and none. Perhaps google could just set a limit so that if a given site is linked to so many times, it becomes suspect and is lowered in the ranking. I would have to be set fairly high, of course. I would still like an easy option to filter out the large weblogging sites, livejournal being one.

      I believe that google supports that, so I'll have to look into it. Of course, I'd also love an option to ignore trackbacks. :)

      --
      I was raised on the command line, bitch

      "Nemo me impune lacesset"

    11. Re:Thank goodness for TrackBack by FleaPlus · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't it be trivial for google's PageRank to either ignore trackback links or give them a lower score?

    12. Re:Thank goodness for TrackBack by atriusofbricia · · Score: 1

      I would imagine not.

      --
      I was raised on the command line, bitch

      "Nemo me impune lacesset"

  5. WTF? by _Smacndeez_ · · Score: 0

    Man, WTF?

    im not a 12yo girl, and I use LJ.. and I will probably quit now that they got sold .. dangit.

    1. Re:WTF? by tuxter · · Score: 1

      Ummmmm, why? Would you stop listening to the radio if your favourite station got bought and kept the same programming? I think not, maybe think about comments before you post.

    2. Re:WTF? by wankledot · · Score: 1
      Hmm, sarcasm meter is stuck near 50%, I'll bite

      why would you quit, the same people are running it, and there are no plans to change anything that wouldn't have likely changed before.

      --
      My sig is blank, I typed this by hand.
    3. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because, like she said, she's not a 12 year old girl. She's a 10 year old girl.

    4. Re:WTF? by lowpass_wilter · · Score: 0

      And so even more fuckable. Yummy.

    5. Re:WTF? by Punboy · · Score: 1

      "im not a 12yo girl, and I use LJ.. and I will probably quit now that they got sold .. dangit. "

      No no no, not dangit, danga :-p

      --
      If you like what I've said here, and want to read more, go to http://www.krillrblog.com
    6. Re:WTF? by ral315 · · Score: 1
      Man, WTF?

      im not a 12yo girl, and I use LJ.. and I will probably quit now that they got sold .. dangit.

      Apparently, you use AOL, though.
  6. Will this affect supervision/abuse? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I wonder whether this will affect the webmaster/abuse contacts' attitudes.

    Speaking as someone who's had inappropriate personal information and untrue claims splattered all over the board by a malicious ex, who knew many mutual friends would see it, I was less than impressed by the LiveJournal team's response when I pointed out that defamatory/illegal content was being posted. The ex in question made that post private when I sent her a rather pointed message about it, and the LiveJournal admins then claimed that they "couldn't see private messages" and therefore couldn't investigate my claim, despite the fact that those mutual friends still had no trouble reading every false allegation.

    This sort of thing seems to be a serious problem with cheap/freebie blog-hosting services: they're particularly vulnerable to malicious content. In particular, while they have all the usual problems with regulating content as any other part of the Internet, they usually lack adequate resources and/or the willingness to deal with abuse. I'm all for freedom of speech as a general principle, but all the usual legal safeguards seem to be summarily ignored here because they're just too hard to enforce with the current mechanisms, and people's lives can become very unpleasant as a result.

    1. Re:Will this affect supervision/abuse? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking as someone who's had inappropriate personal information and untrue claims splatter all over via snail mail, I was less than impressed by the governments response when I pointed it out. They claimed that they "can't read people's private mail" and therefore couldn't investigate my claim.

    2. Re:Will this affect supervision/abuse? by L.Bob.Rife · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ex's will always find a way to tell negative stories to mutual friends. Don't blame livejournal for your ex-gf being a bitch.

    3. Re:Will this affect supervision/abuse? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of those abuse attitudes are the result of them being overworked. Rather than effecting abuse attitudes, I suspect we will see a lot of abuse and support volunteers leave because of this, as well as an increase in growth for the site.

      As a result, expect even less responsiveness from LiveJournal.

    4. Re:Will this affect supervision/abuse? by metamatic · · Score: 0

      Funny, I had the opposite problem. I posted information about someone that the person himself published on his own pages, and the Abuse team deleted my account. (See sig link.)

      I think the Abuse team just lack competence.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  7. LJ trackbacks will make Google go wonky... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google ranks pages based on their links. Giving thousands of LJ users trackback will alter Google results forever (unless they start filtering those out)

    1. Re:LJ trackbacks will make Google go wonky... by djsmiley · · Score: 3, Informative

      Google ranks is clever like that.
      As if the first page in the pile has a low rank, it gives off an even smaller part of this to the next page. Now, if a BIG blog which was very popular joined this, it would effect maybe 1 or 2 tiers down but after this yet again its gone.

      This means only the BIG blogs can stay at the top, and anyway when googling, how many blogs do you click?

      I know i never click any, not by habit but because there is none there. I guess this is due to the almost randomness of the infomation contained therein.

      Oh and so you know im not bshitting about what i know about google, my sites listed top for djsmiley, djsmiley2k, tim bowers, and a few other terms...
      The method? Add sensible content, add adwords, and add links to all my bookmarks.

      At first when someone does something different google ranks tend to end up ranking it highly, but as soon as everyone catches on, it drops again to a normal level.

      (now waiting for home PC to get /.'ed

      --
      - http://www.milkme.co.uk
  8. Story from previous day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So, I guess when "sources close to Brad Fitzpatrick" said that LiveJournal was not being sold... well, not so much eh?

    1. Re:Story from previous day by P-Frank · · Score: 1

      I sat next to him on a bus once (so close that we were hip to hip) and as far as I knew it wasn't being sold...

    2. Re:Story from previous day by Infinityis · · Score: 1

      Oh, you thought he meant THAT Brad Fitzpatrick...

    3. Re:Story from previous day by ceejayoz · · Score: 1

      Didn't you hear? The Slashdot editors don't have to act like responsible journalists until next week...

  9. Nice quote by FleaPlus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Here's an interesting blog post by Mena, President of Six Apart. I thought the following quote was interesting in the context of the typical "bloggerz sux0r" threads you see on slashdot:

    I believe that LiveJournal has, unfortunately, received a bum rap because many have considered the postings on LiveJournal to be trivial. It's sort of like a vicious circle: Journalists make fun of webloggers saying that they only post about their cats, webloggers make fun of LiveJournalers saying that they only post about high school angst and LiveJournalers make fun of webloggers saying that they are SUV-driving yuppies who think they have something important to say (and I'm generalizing). The fact is, webloggers and LiveJournalers are in essence doing the same thing: they are posting their thoughts to people who are important to them. For some webloggers, it's 100,000 people, for others it is 10. For LiveJournalers, it may be 30 people, it may be 3 (or a combination of some number).

  10. Hey, amateur porn is where it's at... by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 4, Informative

    So long as the amateur porn stays in place, and I can continue to co-admin my porn community, then all is well. (You need to get an account to read the community, and list a valid 18+ birthdate, and submit a join-request. This is so the community doesn't get deleted. It's a CYA maneuver by the livejournal administration to ensure that everybody who watches porn can lie about their age.)

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
    1. Re:Hey, amateur porn is where it's at... by IrishMASMS · · Score: 1

      Ssssssssssssssshhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!! The first rule of lj comm=kaizersoze125 is to not talk about lj comm=kaizersoze125! ;)

  11. Another win for Open Source! by Meor · · Score: 0

    I'm sure most LiveJournal users are concerned with the database API that stores their LOL OMG:Happymood: journal entries.

  12. Page Ads? by darkain · · Score: 1

    I'm a paid member, so I dont see them... but I've seen members in my communities start complaining abuot banner ads on their journals now. Is this the first sign of change already?

    1. Re:Page Ads? by FleaPlus · · Score: 1

      I think that just means people have spyware installed on their computers which are inserting banner ads. I remember the same thing happened with my old roommate and google.

    2. Re:Page Ads? by emilymildew · · Score: 1

      Or they're joking, like the vynlgirl mentioned above.

  13. Ack... by HawkeVIPER · · Score: 1

    I don't know whether to feel happy or sad about this merger... I have the distinct feeling that support will divide by 0, prices for paid accounts with do the opposite and server uptimes will become $n-x in $n days, where x is a random integer.

    *sighs*

    1. Re:Ack... by AEton · · Score: 1

      Ooh! Support will approach infinity and paid accounts will approach zero!

      Truly these are the end times.

      --
      We recently had heard in the office over one of the Yellow Machine that's made by Anthology Solutions.
    2. Re:Ack... by HawkeVIPER · · Score: 1

      *chuckles* Taken of course, from "The definitive guide to IT Business Management" - M.I. Crosoft

    3. Re:Ack... by millennial · · Score: 1

      I have no ads on my journal... sounds like your friends are either a) on crack or b) adware-laden.

      --
      I am scientifically inaccurate.
    4. Re:Ack... by HawkeVIPER · · Score: 1

      And you sir, just replied to the wrong thread. Give yourself a pat on the back and collect your ROTD award.

    5. Re:Ack... by millennial · · Score: 1

      Interesting. I clicked the 'reply' link to the post about ads, and ended up replying to the wrong one... is Slashdot a bit broken, perhaps?

      --
      I am scientifically inaccurate.
    6. Re:Ack... by HawkeVIPER · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      /., broken?! What blasphemy is this? On a side note; it has been known.

    7. Re:Ack... by slavemowgli · · Score: 1

      I have the distinct feeling that support will divide by 0, prices for paid accounts with do the opposite

      You mean, support will increase to infinity and prices will drop to zero? :) That actually would be nice.

      --
      quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
  14. TypeKey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trackbacking is awesome, but will SixApart take their Typekey service to Livejournal?

    That could make for some controversy...
    http://www.typekey.com/

  15. Yay! by metlin · · Score: 1

    Well, atleast now we've proven that Slashdot is more reliable than blogs of 13 year old girls ;)

    We atleast bother backing up our rumours with evidence (sometimes!).

    Take that, Jenny. Ahaan!

  16. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how comes every "Obligatory" post is lame?

    yours stands our tho

    its like asking a warez group "I've got a 56k dialup for 2 hours a day, can I join?"

  17. Mod Parent Offtopic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well isn't that special. Take your porn spam elsewhere, thanks.

    1. Re:Mod Parent Offtopic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You clearly don't know LiveJournal. It's all about the amateur porn.

  18. Sweet. by millennial · · Score: 1

    Wonder if they'll open up some of the features the old company was charging for, like phone posts and more user icons?

    Ooh. On second thought, I wonder if they'll even have those at all... did they buy the servers that hosted LJ (and the code for the VoIP stuff), or just all the content?

    --
    I am scientifically inaccurate.
    1. Re:Sweet. by casparianaremi · · Score: 1

      They purchased the entire thing, the servers, the staff, the coders. Basically, nothing changes except the ownership. It frees up Brad to develop the system more efficiently and not worry about the business side of things, and SixApart can input where they have more experience (navigation, design etc).

  19. Re:Nooo... please. No more MT or LJ blogs. by Dizzle · · Score: 1

    I might have complaints about other portions of the internet, but I have a simple solution: don't read them. You have absolutely no obligation to read a blog, be it LiveJournal or Blogger or anything else. Exercise your right to choice and ignore them.

    --
    -Dizzle
    "I most likely AM so interested in myself."
  20. Let the record show... by IInventedTheInternet · · Score: 1

    ...that Grendel Drargo really knows his pornography

  21. Correction by wankledot · · Score: 3, Informative

    SA is buying Livejournal fromDanga, they are not buying Danga itself.

    --
    My sig is blank, I typed this by hand.
    1. Re:Correction by Apathetic1 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I believe your post is technically correct but it's also misleading. Six Apart may not be buying Danga but the Danga employees will be moving to San Francisco, at least according to the news post:

      What happens to the Danga employees?
      We're moving to San Francisco! *ding ding*
      --

      My username does not make me Apathetic. It's irony, get it?

    2. Re:Correction by stephenbooth · · Score: 2, Informative

      Someone asked Brad directly if it was Danga or just LJ that was being sold and he stated it was all of it.

      Stephen

      --
      "Don't write down to your readers, the only people less intelligent than you can't read" - Sign on Newspaper Office Wall
    3. Re:Correction by Fulton+Green · · Score: 1

      So the official press release is lying about SA acquiring Danga?

    4. Re:Correction by dmehus · · Score: 1

      Correction again. From the press release, it states they've acquired Danga Interactive, Inc., and (presumably) have 100% ownership (in exchange for a combination of cash-and-stock). They're acquiring the source code to LiveJournal, and all its infrastructure components.

      I've got a more thorough write-up on my blog:
      dmehus.blogspot.com

      I use Blogger because of its permalink and post editing abilities, but I am considering either a switch to MSN Spaces or (possibly, and I stress this word heavily) back to LiveJournal -- if it can make major changes.

      Cheers,
      Doug

    5. Re:Correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not all of them are moving.

  22. What's the business model? by AutumnLeaf · · Score: 1

    I'm not completely sure I get this. I read both Brad and Mena's posts on the journal. They've talked quite a bit about preserving the Live Journal community and making it better. What I don't understand is how this helps 6 Apart make more money, which ought to be the whole idea behind the merger from the business side. I can appreciate Brad doesn't enjoy the business side of running a business, so I can see what he personally gets out of it. Can anyone familiar with this aspect of 6 Apart comment?

    It seems to me at some point they will need to think about how to get their users to cough up more dough, or how to mine their user base for dough (selling lists/personal info).

    1. Re:What's the business model? by Rakishi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You are assuming that LJ doesn't make money already.

    2. Re:What's the business model? by FleaPlus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Perhaps we'll see livejournal being touted as a more "personal" free solution, with Movable Type touted as the more "professional" solution. I figure we'll see greater interoperability between the two, allowing LJ'ers to easily add Movable Type blogs to their friends list, and vice versa. Overall, this would lead to a greater incentive to choose LJ/MT instead of, say, Blogger.

    3. Re:What's the business model? by captnitro · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In addition to the "compare and contrast" contributions we'll see, it's also this: in the next decade, it will be about a return to communities on the web. In the early 90s it was a bunch of local BBSs, and now the web is too big to be a "community" most of the time. People want to reach out to other people, and blogs, for better or for worse, often do that. (For worse, I know I've made fun of blogs as a way for people to be passive-aggressive to those they don't want to talk to in person.. :)

      I think Six Apart wants to be a major force in that movement, in generating communities, and how communities will play into the future of the web and how we communicate with one another. For one, LJ subscribers (myself included) will be paying Six Apart AFAIK, not Danga, so there's profit there. Also, competition; the fewer games in town, or the more that you control, the better.

      On a separate note, does anybody seem to see a trend with the next 'dot-com' being funded open-source, or even just homegrown, web solutions ("we're not selling the product, we're selling the service")? It seems like I've heard of quite a few open source projects getting bank from just being good for long enough.. one clear example being Linux, but also reading Mena's blog -- (paraphrased) "me and my husband released Moveable Type in 2001, when I was 24". Now they have offices in Tokyo, Paris, and San Francisco. It seems like I need to find a killer app and a web server.

    4. Re:What's the business model? by captainclever · · Score: 1

      LJ make money already.

      Look at the stats on how many paid accounts they have, and the price per month for such an account.

      It works out over $150,000 per month income i believe ;)

      --
      Last.fm - join the social music revolution
    5. Re:What's the business model? by BohemianCoast · · Score: 1

      LJ and Six Apart complement each other quite well. Six Apart clearly wants Brad's personal skills -- his ability to scale LJ is legendary, and LJ also managed to design a payment structure that made them profitable while keeping the site free for normal use and without irritating their user base. (LiveJournal users pay extra for things like access to faster servers and extra user pics; nice to haves but not essential features).

      Contrast Movable Type, which upset exactly everybody with their licenses; a basic MT installation for, eg, a couple posting pictures of their cats, is $70 now. LJ is also essentially free of comment spam, while Movable Type is beset with it. On the other hand, Movable Type and TypePad are beautiful, elegant systems, easy to use, extensible and customisable. LiveJournal, well, isn't.

  23. Six Apart v Google by RobertTaylor · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Why is Six Apart buying LiveJournal?
    Lots of reasons:

    Together we form super robot that's stronger than the sum of its parts.
    Super robots can fight super companies."


    Blogger.com bought up by Google...

    To think that millions of £££ venture capital will be spent over which system publishes what 14 year old Lisa's dog ate last night.

    1. Re:Six Apart v Google by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      To think that millions of £££ venture capital will be spent over which system publishes what 14 year old Lisa's dog ate last night.

      To think that maybe venture capitalists have a better understanding of the potential of these self-publishing tools than people like us do.

      Hey, it could happen. First time for everything, even VCs having a clue.

  24. "zomg ADS" reporter = plugging another blog site by Hobart · · Score: 1

    If you look at her replies to Brad's post, you'll see she's trying to drum up hype for her friends alternative blog site.

    --
    o/~ Join us now and share the software ...
  25. Re:Well by Anubis350 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I notice you're a subscriber to slashdot. Do you have these same arguments about slashdot (bought by corporation, lots of adverts, etc). This is just like when /. was bought by OSDN, and just like slashdot, LJ is and will remain open source. Why are the two any different....

    I call hypocrite...

    --Anubis

    --
    "goodbye and hello, as always" ~Prince Corwin, from Zelazny's Amber series
  26. Though everyone complains about LJ... by shawnywany · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I tried getting my journal back on my domain for good, but I just cannot leave a couple of Livejournal's features.

    One, I keep a tightly-knit friends-list, and sadly enough, those people would not read my journal regularly if it were not on Livejournal. On LJ, it's just a matter of opening up the "friends page" and seeing all of your friends' entries at once. Handy and keeps you and your buddies close, even if you rarely have the chance to really chat or talk.

    Two, I adore the communities. When I need information on some subject, there's always a community. Not only that, but it's usually active. I prefer having a human helping hand rather than that of a search engine; both at once are even better (ha.) For example, I trust the ladies at the VaginaPagina community to relate experiences and help--especially since everyone is there to do just that.

    I used to scoff at LJ, but now that I'm there, I just can't leave.

    1. Re:Though everyone complains about LJ... by mattwarden · · Score: 1

      One, I keep a tightly-knit friends-list, and sadly enough, those people would not read my journal regularly if it were not on Livejournal. On LJ, it's just a matter of opening up the "friends page" and seeing all of your friends' entries at once. Handy and keeps you and your buddies close, even if you rarely have the chance to really chat or talk.

      I don't get it. You think this is unique to LJ? Do a goodle on RSS aggregators. LJ's friends page is inferior for the reason you mention: it can only aggregate other LJs.

    2. Re:Though everyone complains about LJ... by shawnywany · · Score: 1

      No, I know RSS isn't unique to Livejournal. I collect RSS feeds on other stuff too. I'm a newb to that, and Livejournal makes it easy. I have a feed running from my linkblog on one of my old domains and I have that set up as a 'friend' on Livejournal too so my other friends can read that. I suppose it's more about doing what makes it easiest to stay in touch with my tech-impaired friends--and keep it easy for my tech-impaired self. I enjoy the interactions between communities, other users and myself. Eh, I worded my original post weird and I can't change it; apologies.

    3. Re:Though everyone complains about LJ... by the+unbeliever · · Score: 1

      Paid accounts can create syndicated accounts, which aggregate any RSS feed you wish.

    4. Re:Though everyone complains about LJ... by Homburg · · Score: 1

      One, I keep a tightly-knit friends-list, and sadly enough, those people would not read my journal regularly if it were not on Livejournal.

      Well, you could set up a WordPress blog and use LivePress to copy the entries to your LJ.

      Also, you could try Bloglines, an online RSS aggregator which is like a much improved friends page.

    5. Re:Though everyone complains about LJ... by mdwh2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes but the issue is not whether I know about RSS readers and can be bothered to download and use one, it's whether I can convince 150+ of my LJ readers to do so. Just about everyone I know has an LJ, but few if any are using RSS readers.

      Also RSS readers alone don't solve the problem of private "friends only" posting (afaik) - someone would still need an LJ account to be able to read my non-public entries, so once they've done that, it's usually easier to just use the Friends page system. If I was hosting my journal on my own website, I'd need to give people an account/password just to read the non-public entries of my journal, which is more hassle.

    6. Re:Though everyone complains about LJ... by rho · · Score: 1

      I had some trouble using RSS when the LJ was "friends only", so it's only a partial solution.

      --
      Potato chips are a by-yourself food.
    7. Re:Though everyone complains about LJ... by Homburg · · Score: 1

      Yeah, just after I posted that, I went over to a Livejournal that I subscribe to the RSS of, but also check manually for friends-only posts, and remembered that very problem. It's a shame there is (as far as I know) no way to access ones Friends page via RSS.

    8. Re:Though everyone complains about LJ... by AdamTheBastard · · Score: 1

      head over to LJ/~lj_nifty read through the memories. I'm sure someone has made a tool to put all your friend's entries into an RSS feed.

    9. Re:Though everyone complains about LJ... by Z303 · · Score: 1
  27. Re:Well by Anubis350 · · Score: 1

    woops, meant /. bought by OSTG

    --
    "goodbye and hello, as always" ~Prince Corwin, from Zelazny's Amber series
  28. LJ Backup/Export to XML by NeuralAbyss · · Score: 4, Informative

    I wrote this script after hearing the rumours.. can also be a good thing if you just want a backup of your livejournal.

    LJExport v0.1

    Any comments are welcome.. released under the BSD license.

    1. Re:LJ Backup/Export to XML by Malk-a-mite · · Score: 3, Informative

      http://www.livejournal.com/export.bml

    2. Re:LJ Backup/Export to XML by NeuralAbyss · · Score: 0

      Crap.. foiled again!

    3. Re:LJ Backup/Export to XML by SKPhoton · · Score: 1

      Charm is a command-line based livejournal client capable of archiving and backing up all of your previous entries. Livejournal's export page allows just one month at a time.

    4. Re:LJ Backup/Export to XML by compwizrd · · Score: 1

      pain in the ass if you have more than a few months to backup.... plus that won't backup comments.

      http://ryzh.kiev.ua/ljsm/index_en.html
      worked quite nicely for me last night.. makes a bunch of html files, each one having a journal entry/comments.. and there's a utility to combine it all into one

    5. Re:LJ Backup/Export to XML by exhilaration · · Score: 1

      LJ Archive can do the same thing, and it has a pretty interface.

    6. Re:LJ Backup/Export to XML by cdwiegand · · Score: 1

      http://www.livejournal.com/~elfric/109220.html

      Which is MUCH better, the export.bml only exports a month at a time, if you've been using LJ for any length of time, backing up each month one at a time is a pain...

      --
      . Define sqrt(x) as something really evil like (x / rand()), and bury it deep. Watch your coworkers go nuts.
  29. Kinda makes sense by arvindn · · Score: 1

    LJ has 5.6 million user accounts. 2.4 million of which are active. Far more than slashdot. However, as Brad points out, its an "inward facing" community. I'd never heard of the site until a few months ago. They sure could use better marketing. And better integration with the broader blogging world (with TrackBack). TFA repeatedly states that SixApart aren't out to destroy LJ, but they can do that even without intending to. Let's wait and see.

    1. Re:Kinda makes sense by PerlDudeXL · · Score: 1

      I'm a LJ user myself and I never discovered all those
      different communities until about 2 months ago.
      Not even /. generates so much drivel (communities + user blogs).

      Especially those 'Friends Only' blogs are a sign of this "inward facing".

  30. Yes, that's it *exactly* by wirefarm · · Score: 1, Funny

    The content management system is doing that.
    Just today I was posting an article discussing Renaissance architecture and what came out was a shoegazer post about cat shit.

    I think it must have something to do with the version of PERL I'm using.

    --
    -- My Weblog.
    1. Re:Yes, that's it *exactly* by Infinityis · · Score: 1

      I could be wrong, but I'm pretty sure any version of PERL will do that to you...

  31. Nervous by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Okay, being a five-year user of LJ (user number 1112, suckers) and perm-account holder, I've got a considerable stake in all this. It makes me nervous. I'm not familiar enough with Six Apart and their treatment of MT to be confident in their ability to maintain the status quo around LJ-land. I'm afraid that the business will do what all businesses do, and eventually change from being "for the people" to being "for the profit."

    There are literally hundreds of thousands of people who have put time and effort into their own little portion of the Internet, and I'm afraid that with one motion Brad's damaged their stock. The thing is - this is something Brad's been putting his life into for around six years now. If anything he's got the most to lose. (Ignoring the nice chunck of change he jsut pocketed.) Hopefully he walked into this with due diligence and maintains some official control over where LJ will head.

    I suppose that's the one question I haven't seen answered - from what Brad said, it seems like he's now just an employee. Any official power he now has is ceremonial. So I hope he made the right choice.

    --
    ± 29 dB
    1. Re:Nervous by FleaPlus · · Score: 1

      From Brad's post:

      Ever since LiveJournal got big and popular, a number of companies have been offering to buy LiveJournal. I suppose it was inevitable, but the more I talked to everybody, the less interested I became in selling. With a few exceptions, nobody seemed to "get it", and people's ideas for LiveJournal's future were generally lame. I started to realize that selling LiveJournal would mean killing LiveJournal, so I didn't. Then one day Six Apart contacts us, we start talking, and here we are. I know you may not necessarily trust me when I say they're a cool company, but I'd ask at least that you give them a chance before you start rioting in the streets. I have a lot of confidence that this union will produce cool things.

      Ben and Mena, the founders of Six Apart, have built a great company and hand-picked a lot of great people. Over the past couple months I've come to know their executive team really well, and they're people I feel confident taking over control of my baby. They've already shown that they'll defer to me on issues of community, fearful of doing anything that'd upset people. As for the rest of the team, I've only started meeting them all, but my mouth hit the floor when I saw some of the latest stuff they have in the works.

      If you want to run for the hills and backup your journal and move to another service, feel free, but hopefully you'll be back in 6 months when we've proven ourselves.

    2. Re:Nervous by idiotnot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I haven't been on LJ nearly that long, but I share your concerns.

      I don't trust SixApart as far as I can throw them. That Brad does is all well and good, but I don't. Not after what they did with the MT license. I help maintain a community machine shared among about 70 people. We had quite a few users who were using MT to host blogs. Mind you, this is a community machine, composed of donated hardware, run with donated power and bandwidth. SixApart refused to give us a free license for the new version. They wanted $500, or whatever it was. They said that we could do the individual install thing, but we would have had to have each user install his own copy of MT. Because some of our users aren't geeks, this was really out-of-the question.

      In the end, we ended up doing lots of work moving people to WordPress. But I really don't want to do business with SixApart after the way they handled MT. So, I think I probably be taking down my LJ sometime soon. It's sad, really, because I do enjoy using it.

      Just my $0.02.

    3. Re:Nervous by slavemowgli · · Score: 1

      You do NOT have a permanent account - you are an early adopter, which is something different entirely. :) That being said, I share your nervousness. Of course, in the blogging world in particular, "for the profit" is the same as "for the people", since a site like Livejournal is worth nothing without a large userbase, but I don't immediately trust SA to realize that and make the right decisions (or, rather, abstain from making the wrong ones). Well, we'll see what happens.

      --
      quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
    4. Re:Nervous by grahams · · Score: 1

      Brad becomes SixApart's Chief Architect.

    5. Re:Nervous by emilymildew · · Score: 1

      Whine whine whine, 6A took something they were giving away and started charing for it, whine whine whine.

      Why didn't you just install 2.63? Nobody said you had to have the fastest best or newest.

    6. Re:Nervous by initsix · · Score: 1

      I think SixApart was fair in asking for ~$500 for multi user version that supports 70 users. If you were able to get donations for hardware and bandwidth, im sure another ~$7/ per user is not unreasonable. And like you mentioned they were allowing you to install individual instances of MT for free. Whats the big deal? Pony up 500 bucks or install 70 instances of MT for your users yourself if your users are not techincal enough.

    7. Re:Nervous by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 1

      No, actually, I do. Follow the "my new account" link from the profile I linked to above, or the "web site" I have listed under my /. account. I created a new account when I went permanant, as it seemed like a good time for a few other changes as well.

      I was one of the first 100 people to get the perm accounts when they were offered oh-so-long ago.

      --
      ± 29 dB
    8. Re:Nervous by slavemowgli · · Score: 1

      Ah, OK. Out of curiosity, how'd you get it? ^^

      --
      quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
    9. Re:Nervous by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 1

      Chief Architect...of LiveJournal. Presumably he won't have much to do with MT except where the code bases overlap. And what does that mean? Unfortunately, as a company, those who own it are still in charge. If push comes to shove, they can boot Brad whenever they feel the need. That's my problem here - supposedly Brad will keep control, but it's all ceremonial power at this point.

      --
      ± 29 dB
    10. Re:Nervous by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 1

      In In the early early days of paid accounts, they started to feel the crunch of new users and the old servers just weren't handling everything well, so they needed to purchase new, bigger ones. $10,000 was determined to be a sufficient amount of money, so they sold 100 permanent accounts for $100 on a first-come first-serve basis. Being the irresponsible college student, I took them up on the offer. Since I still use LJ over four years later, I suppose my investment has just started paying off.

      --
      ± 29 dB
    11. Re:Nervous by slavemowgli · · Score: 1

      Makes me wish they'd do that (selling permanent accounts) again. :)

      --
      quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
    12. Re:Nervous by idiotnot · · Score: 1

      Whats the big deal?

      It was a stupid change, almost on the level of the XFree86 license change.

      Pony up 500 bucks or install 70 instances of MT for your users yourself if your users are not techincal enough.

      No need, and why would we? Since we had to do all that work (because of them), it was better to move people to WordPress, which is free software. Why would we continue to support them by using their software? So they can start charging the individual users next? It's not like we're rich -- the hardware is nothing cutting-edge, and the bandwidth is unused co-lo space at a company owned by a couple of the users. This is not something to which we really dedicate any money.

  32. As a livejournal user... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    I, for one, welcome our new corporate overlords.

  33. Re:Nooo... please. No more MT or LJ blogs. by BumpyCarrot · · Score: 0

    Y'know, you don't *have* to read them.

    --
    Do you see what I did there?
  34. Re:"zomg ADS" reporter = plugging another blog sit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  35. SA Induced Angst by Wingie · · Score: 1

    It's brilliant! If SA screws LJ users over, that would create a horde of people who would want to bitch and moan and whine and write bad poetry on their LiveJournals. But then since SA controls LJ, they would either have to rant somewhere else (God forbid!) or pay to get a new LJ account so they can rant about how they had got screwed over but ended up going back to SA anyway. And you know what? I bet a large amount of people would do exactly that if SA decides to screw LJ over. Some people are that stupid. LiveJournal is a very emotional place. And as we all know, no matter how many times emotionally abusive "signifigant others" hurt some people, they still end up crawling back just to get screwed over again. Six Apart could just take this principle and apply it to making money. Hell, a bunch of assholes already do their with their girlfriends.

  36. Mod parent up by BumpyCarrot · · Score: 1

    Damn that made me laugh.

    --
    Do you see what I did there?
  37. Addendum... by mattwarden · · Score: 1

    little else will change for the end user.

    Oh, except for that whole loss-of-rights-to-one's-soul thing, right?

  38. Just as long... by zwilliams07 · · Score: 1

    ...as this doesn't inhibit my freedom to rant on for two days about how frappy my cappuccino is, I'm fine.

    Gawd, I'm so lonely...

  39. Beaverton staff getting canned? by Baloo+Ursidae · · Score: 1

    After they shafted my Scout troop in the late 1990s, please tell me the Beaverton Livejournal staff is getting shitcanned

    --
    Help us build a better map!
  40. Someone mod this up by xixax · · Score: 1

    Probably the most insightful comment I've seen so far.

    --
    "Everything is adjustable, provided you have the right tools"
  41. Good for SA by Peter+Cooper · · Score: 1

    This move will be good for SA, because LiveJournal has some excellent thinkers and programmers. Okay, their users might tend to be a bit juvenile, but LiveJournal's architecture is pretty amazing. It's great what the team have managed to do with limited resources, they've developed some really hot technologies, like memcached, which even Slashdot uses now.

    I just hope technology migrates from LJ to SA's products, rather than the other way round.. no TypeKey or comment spam on LJ please!

  42. Not so easy to ignore sometimes.. by EvilStein · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... when you're doing a Google search and blogs are cluttering up the first 200 pages of results, it's kind of hard to just "ignore them."

    1. Re:Not so easy to ignore sometimes.. by Sea-Wolf · · Score: 1

      I would say that is an issue with Google, rather than the Bloggers, after all, they've got every right to publish whatever they want on the Internet. If Google is cataloging it incorrectly, then that's a problem for Google to solve and I'm quite sure they're working on it.

      --
      -- If it's stupid but works, it isn't stupid.
    2. Re:Not so easy to ignore sometimes.. by EvilStein · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're certainly right - my point was that sometimes it's not so easy to ignore blogs because there are so many of them with that trackback feature, that it's becoming very easy for them to clutter up search engines. It's even worse when you are looking for something and find nothing but blogs linking to "it" ("it" being an article you're looking for) but "it" is now a 404. Example: Dell put up a funny ad. Lots and lots of bloggers were posting about it and linking to the LA Times website. Well, the LA Times expired that image. None of the bloggers mirrored it, so now they're all linking to something that isn't there anymore.

      It's just kind of annoying overall. :|

  43. Re:"zomg ADS" reporter = plugging another blog sit by FinestLittleSpace · · Score: 1

    awww she believes in it too. cheeeeeeeeeeeeeright!

  44. LJSM BACKUP NOW!!! by nilbog · · Score: 0
    LJSM is a great command line tool (I know you love the command line!) that will backup your livejournal and even make a nice html index for all your posts. I wiould suggest using it now, because WHO KNOWS what could happen.

    p.s. Im not affiliated with LJSM, but it is great software.

    --
    or else!
  45. Mood: by rmart · · Score: 2, Funny

    depressed :(

  46. cool by adeydas · · Score: 1

    all i can see is LJ is gonna get better...

  47. Re:cool by adeydas · · Score: 1

    though i am not sure about their word about the licence part...

  48. Re:cool by Max+Threshold · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Don't mod jokes down just because you don't get them.

  49. Anyone got a DeadJournal Invite for me? by syntap · · Score: 0

    I'm not looking forward to adding ads to the teenage g@mr grlz whining.

  50. hah, 'still open source' .. not for long by FuzzieNorn · · Score: 2, Informative

    They've ripped their commitment to keeping the site as Free Software out of their social contract (which they've renamed to 'guiding principles' anyway).

    Details of the change are here.

    1. Re:hah, 'still open source' .. not for long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's GPL-licenced and riddled with other people's contributions, so even if future stuff doesn't get an open-source release they can't do much about the licencing of the code thus far.

  51. Re:Well by ross_winn · · Score: 1

    I didn't become a member of Slashdot until the site proved it's worth. The issue that I have with the LJ sale is that they have conveniently obviated the social contract and simultaneously prevented further posting unless you agree to their authority. I have a paid subscription until X date, I should get access until X date. I understand having to agree to a new TOS to renew, but not blindsided at 7am on a Thursday.

    --
    Ross Winn "not just another ugly face..."
  52. NOT TRUE by VE3ECM · · Score: 1
    LJ got rid of the "faster servers for paid users" almost a year ago.

    LJ added some pretty heavy duty hardware in the last year. I've been using them since Dec. 2000, and the service has never been better, even though I've been a paid user most of that time.

    1. Re:NOT TRUE by Wdomburg · · Score: 0

      And they changed their load balancers to give priority to paid users months ago. (Rather than keeping a seperate pool.)

    2. Re:NOT TRUE by samael · · Score: 1

      And then they brought in queues - where paid users got served faster than unpaid users.

      See here

  53. A bad day for open source. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since much of this purchase has been done with stock, it's telling that nobody seems to be stating the obvious -- is having a profit-driven, soon-to-be-publically traded company control what software goes into a major open source project a good thing?

    How would we view this if, say, Yahoo purchased a site like Slashdot, and was able to decide what features went into all future releases of Slashcode? Would they refuse to add new features that might not serve Yahoo's business model, regardless of their benefit to other Slashcode sites? Would they view those sites as competitors or possible merger targets? Would they release new features desiggned to work with Slashcode that *aren't* open source and then charge people for them? And would they basically make it very hard to fork the code should people complain?

    Despite having dozens of contributors, LiveJournal's code has always had one gatekeeper -- it's founder. And due to the extent of LiveJournal's code and the relative difficulty of contributing to it, few people know how to run a LJ code site, much less know the code well enough to fork it.

    To me, this deal feels like it has the makings of a "lock in" and a clear conflict of interest. It certainly undercuts the volunteer-run/open-source aspect of the site.

    1. Re:A bad day for open source. by sleeplesseye · · Score: 1

      LiveJournal already has sections of its code base that aren't open source, so using software and style add-ons to their advantage isn't just possible... it's already happening.

    2. Re:A bad day for open source. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So much for the open source features of LiveJournal. See this post from one of LiveJournal's coders.

      "The open source aspect of livejournal is coming to a close." . . . "Because of this site and others like it, LiveJournal will most likely never again release a new feature publically. And that's pretty sad."

      To this I say **Waaah!!** Poor LiveJournal. Their code that they made publically available on the 'net is being used!

      Frankly, while GJ appears to have violated GPL in the past, it also seems like they did some pretty obvious, straight-forward things, such as using LJ's icons, that were both unintentional and to some extent in with the rest of the code by default. It's apparently common for people using LJ's code to have a lot of the same "place filler" content in with the rest of the source which LJ claims isn't GPLed.

      I couldn't imagine Slashdot coming down so hard on a site that used an icon or some text of theirs, so to me it seems a lot of this is sour grapes about LJ-code sites deciding to give away what LJ is choosing to sell. To that I say *DUH!* That is their right, in most cases.

  54. How sustainable is blog biz anyway? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Considering that most consumers are willing to pay $0.38 for blogging (average donation to Movable Type), how the heck do these companies plan on making a long term biz?

  55. Story on Toronto Star business section front page by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

    Sale of `blog' service raises privacy concerns A small bit, continued on page 4, but interesting that they're tracking the story that quickly rather than saving it for Monday's weekly @ section. (P.4 also has a picture of Hitachi's domino-sized "Mikey" 500GB drive. Cool!)

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  56. Re:Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LiveJournal is different because LiveJournal is different. The process of adding new code to Slashcode is pretty much transparent, whereas the sole gatekeeper for LiveJournal's source code now works for SixApart... and even he has no real control over his baby anymore. If someone creates some excellent code for LJcode sites that isn't all that great for SixApart/LiveJournal, expect it to be ignored.

    Some developers at LiveJournal already see LJ as having backed out of creating open source code -- many of their newest features are not open source. See this thread.

    In other words, when is open source not?

  57. refunds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Having just paid for another year's service for which the TOS are apparently changing, I've put in several inquiries as to what process I should use to get my money back.

    I wonder how many "Sorry, we're not doing that"'s I'll have to listen to before I do get my money back?

  58. Raising Questions by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 1

    I use LJ and I've raised some interesting points. I hope I get a response that isn't Lawyerese for "stick this spiked dildo up your ass".

    --
    "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
  59. Re:Well by cHiphead · · Score: 0

    Actually I think /. was bought by Andover who in turn was bought by OSTG by its previous name or something.

    And yes, many of us had arguments against commercializing /. by SELLING OUT instead of developing their own business to slingshot with the publicity of /.

    Not trying to start a bitchfest, but it is how I felt about it on many levels.

    Cheers.

    --

    This is my sig. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  60. Newsflash!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Beaverton, OR: Due to personal greed, Brad Fitzpatrick has single-handedly unleashed over 5 million whining emo-punk bloggers, Paypal scam artists and just plain weirdos onto the Internet.

    "I was sick of their shit", Fitzpatrick told reporters earlier today, "I mean, how many times can some mediocre-looking chick post a picture of herself and say 'Dang! Don't I look teh sexah in this? Donate money to my PayPal account and I'll show you my boobs, or maybe I'll blow you if you come visit me in Portland'? How many uneducated political opinions can be posted on the web before it collapses under sheer ennui? How many times does one have to be told that nobody gives a shit about you and your family before it sinks in?

    "I mean, really. Y'all have more computing power on your desks than Project Apollo, and this is what you use it for? It's time to end the era of the mundane blog, so fuck you, I'm taking the money and running. Turn off your fucking computers and go outside for once in your miserable whining lives."

    CERT has been alerted to this sale and is initiating emergency procedures to deal with the expected onslaught of juvenile, tattoo'd, mentally ill sluts, depressed housewives and ass-kissing single men with poor hygiene habits looking to score some 'net pussy.

    Details at 11.

  61. MOD PARENT DOWN - WRONG by yoz · · Score: 0
  62. Google = ...... by jamesmcmurry · · Score: 1

    Google = Flickr + Moveable Type (&Livejournal) + Ecto/Marsedit + NetNewsWire + something +something, etc etc I wrote about this yesterday, and how there needs to be more consolidation in this market place to compete effectively.

    --
    http://www.jamesmcmurry.com
    1. Re:Google = ...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Compete against WHAT and/or for WHAT? These aren't businesses that SELL anything. They have marketshare of a sort but they get it by giving away services for free.

      So far as I know, nobody is making any money worth mentioning. Pennies. Where is the business model? Where are the revenue channels? What makes any of these companies worth anything? The userbase? So what. They are users not customers. Most of them freeload.

      So they don't pay while the do put a huge load on servers. That means they're really a liability rather than an asset.

      Run away, run away, run away. Until major money is there, these companies are basically competing over nothing of value. They can consolidate all they want, but nothing plus nothing is still nothing.

  63. Why upgrade? by yoz · · Score: 1

    In the end, we ended up doing lots of work moving people to WordPress.

    Why didn't you just stick with MT 2.6? That's what I've done on our colo. I'm tempted by WordPress, but so far I haven't found any major reason to switch.

    I understand your concerns with the big MT licensing debacle, but then SA admits it was a debacle, and they substantially changed the pricing structure as a result. Now they've seen how hard the community can bite, I'd be surprised if they'll easily tread on 6.5 million users.

    1. Re:Why upgrade? by idiotnot · · Score: 1

      2.6 is still around, but what happens when someone finds yet another vuln in it? Do I just leave insecure software out there? From my reading of things, they won't be doing anything on the 2.x code branch anymore.....

      And the pricing structure is too little too late. It's still damn expensive, and when I asked about special licensing, they wouldn't even entertain it at the time.

      So, goodbye MT, goodbye SixApart.

  64. Re:holy crap by Striver · · Score: 1

    "I can't believe this is news worthy. Who cares about online journal company buyouts...haha.."

    Oh...nobody really...only about 5 million Live Journal Users. I was reading some of the posts about this on LJ yesterday and someone asked Brad about the "slashdot effect" hitting LJ. His response was that it was only a minor blip since typical LJ traffic is magnitudes greater than slashdot.

    Perhaps you need to read just a few more news worthy articles like this to get back in touch with what is going on in the world.

    --
    this is loaner...my sig is in the shop
  65. Re:"zomg ADS" reporter = plugging another blog sit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm especially amused by her attempts to sound smrt, followed by her head being handed to her on a plate.

  66. Strategy?! My Questions ... by orangeguru · · Score: 1

    Oke, all the big heads at SixApart and Danga confirm that LJ, MT and TypePad will stay independent entities/business divisions.

    They also said LJ will stay opensource and there will be no crossover effect between services like TypePad and LJ in terms of functions and communities.

    Questions? Sure!

    1. Why buy a huge community that hardly makes any money? LJ is mostly for free and hardly makes big cash. Why buy the user base if you could build the technology yourself and try to get more paying customers. The only 'hard' answer can only be time. SixApart needs 'weight' and buying LJ will provide some impressive numbers in terms of users - but hardly in turnover.

    2. Why buy incompatible systems? In the LJ FAQ about the whole affair you can read that both companies like/use PERL. Oh boy! Overall I am only impressed by LJs massive blog handling - but not by it's webware - nor am I impressed by the new releases of MT. I consider them neither very sophisticated nor state of the art.

    3. Do you build communities or technoloy? LJ is about community building (with no sense of exploiting them). MT was about providing commercial blogging apps. A new company should merge a better business practices with a huge community and better tools. But I really wonder if this will work? SixApart has an unhappy history of customer relationships, they used to be advanced in terms of bloggings apps (which is not a huge achievement), while LJ only excels in pure numbers and handling massive requests. So where is the beef?

    4. How you gonna stop the competition? Except Blogger/Google neither Microsoft nor Yahoo have seriously started to push the blogging market - just because they know that the market is still not mature enough to make serious money. But in terms of technology creating a blogging software and infrastructure is hardly a challenge for these companies. And they also have loads of eyeballs. Of course SixApart won't tell us what they have in mind - but today there is no safety in numbers.

    5. What about the public response and it's handling? I suggest SixApart to get themselves some clever PR people. So far the LJ community more or less wet their pants. Most MT or TypePad users don't give a ****. SixApart once had a big cooleness factor on their side - sort of Apple of the blogging scene. They have lost that touch - and it's hard to regain. So far SixApart has failed to create a positive buzz about the whole affair and create some curious customers to maybe buy or subscribe to their much pricier services or products. So far I would consider this the biggest failure so far for the whole affair.

  67. That seems unlikely... by bmabbott · · Score: 1

    Considering that LJ wasn't founded until 1999, and at the time it was located in Seattle in Brad's UW dorm room, it seems unlikely they bought wreaths from you in Beaverton in the late 90's. LJ didn't even have an office until 2003, prior to that it was run out of wherever Brad was living at the time. Perhaps you're confusing them with the previous occupants of the office space they're renting? Incidentaly, no, the staff is not being fired, they're relocating to San Fran.

  68. LJ / /. drama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  69. Nothing to worry about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are at least a dozen people buzzing around LiveJournal who either are or were once contributors to the project. All of them would be able to start a fork if it became necessary, and there's nothing that can be added that the open source contributors couldn't recreate. One look at the LJ source code shows that there's no exceptional skill at Danga, it just happens that those people have traditionally been the gatekeepers which all of the non-staff developers have had to butt-lick to get code in CVS.

    Take a look at their bug tracker and observe all of the perfectly-sensible contributions that have been ignored due to the arrogance of the Danga staff, and the responses they give to people's work. Personally, I don't know why the OS developers bothered given the obvious sour environment, but I get the impression that there's enough pent-up hostility there that at least some of them would be very quick to lash out and fork if the new administration does anything distasteful. It'll be interesting to see what they do in the next few weeks as the situation sinks in.

  70. It's a lie by xv4n · · Score: 1

    "person" was lying.

  71. Long Term Agenda by GrnArmadillo · · Score: 1

    Of course things aren't going to go to heck tomorrow. As the Six Apart owners points out, they just bought the place and don't want to destroy their new toy just yet. And heck, they probably get themselves a PR boost by being able to claim a massive increase in the numbers of people using services they own. Perhaps even some more business from LJ users pleased with the promised upgrades. But in the long term, what are they going to do?

    A) Keep Live Journal at its existing level of performance, providing a totally free competitor to their own paid services that's more than sufficient for 99.9% of the Net or,

    B) Implement changes that make being a free LJ user a lot less desireable.

    As a business, let me think about that one for a minute. With choice B, even if we drive off 99% of LJ's current 5.5 million users and only get 1% to switch over to paid service, we're getting 50K new customers while dramatically lowering overhead/bandwidth for upkeeping the exponentially expanding LJ community. We don't even need to be the "bad" guys by implementing any cruel and unusual license agreements. All we need to do is put hardware upgrades for unpaid users at the bottom of the priority list until people leave on their own. I forget, was there a choice of some sort in there?

    1. Re:Long Term Agenda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mod parent up, this person hit it right on the head

  72. Sick of trackback spam and pointlessness by hackrobat · · Score: 1

    Trackbacks suck. Believe me, it's not worth it. I've moved from LiveJournal to my own WordPress-based blog, and trackbacks is one of the last features I'm excited about. I got tired of all the trackback spam coming my way, and I disabled trackbacks for good.

    Alternative: If you want to know who's linking to your blog -- whether or not they've trackbacked you -- you should look at Bloglines. Even if you don't use Bloglines, someone who reads your blog probably does, and Bloglines knows about which blogs are linking to you.

  73. Dear Six Apart... by cyranoVR · · Score: 1

    Please buy Slashdot's User Journals.

    That way, we can have some actual features.

    Signed,

    The Slashdot Journal Community

  74. Hi, welcome to the Internets. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're reading Slashdot, one would assume that you're net-savvy enough to understand this ridiculously old acronym.

    *rolls eyes*

    1. Re:Hi, welcome to the Internets. by Betelgeuse · · Score: 1

      It may be old, but it's not nearly as prevelant as the other acronyms (at least on /.) . . . and it always takes me a while to figure out even what the more common ones (AFAIK, IANAL, etc) are . . .

      --
      I couldn't tell if you were experimenting with poor-man's cryogenics or looking for the orange sherbet.
  75. Brad said leave, so I left to ModBlog. by WishX · · Score: 1

    "If you want to run for the hills and backup your journal and move to another service, feel free, but hopefully you'll be back in 6 months when we've proven ourselves."

    That's good advice nowso more than ever. I ran for the hills and, honestly, I doubt I'll be back in 6 months. ModBlog offers unlimited image space, full image gallery, free domain forwarding/pointing, live-time stats, no ads, chatterbox, RSS feed, music playlist import and way more is hard to beat. Did I mention it's all free without ads? There isn't even a "paid" or "premium" option because it's all already free!

    Since Brad neglected to give the link, I will.
    http://www.livejournal.com/export.bml
    Exported from LiveJournal (XML) -> Imported into ModBlog. Blam. Done. That easy. Literally.

    No, this isn't an ad or spam. I'm just saying... it worked for me. And since Brad said to, don't we owe it to ourselves to follow the directions of our Fearless Leader? http://www.ModBlog.com

    1. Re:Brad said leave, so I left to ModBlog. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, I'll have to check that out.

    2. Re:Brad said leave, so I left to ModBlog. by angrykeyboarder · · Score: 1

      I've never heard of ModBlog. Unless and until it gains the popularity and "community" of LiveJournal, I'll stay where I am.

      I suspect if anything, LiveJournal will get better, not worse under SixApart.

      --
      Scott

      ©20014 angrykeyboarder & Elmer Fudd. All Wights Wesewved
  76. Jesus H. Christ, you have to be kidding me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well chalk it up to a learning experience, bozo.

    No one's going to spell out acronyms. That's what acronyms are for, is not fucking spelling it out. If you want someone to hold your hand, go back to AOL. Either that or learn to look shit up

    You've got the most powerful information retrieval tool in history sitting at your fingertips, grow a fucking brain and use it.