Its really about weighing your opportunities. Sure if you telecommute your chances of promotion within your company are much lower. But a telecommuter is more of an independent agent anyways. If your telecommuting you can work multiple jobs much easier. Don't consider yourself tied to that one employer, consider yourself a free agent, even if your not..
Ehh, bullshit. My daughter simply isn't interested in tech even though I encourage her. My son might be, or he might not.. He's only 3. Now I bet there are plenty of families out there that the reverse is the case, but not everyone is hardwired for IT. Partially it IS genetics, even if there isn't anything strictly female about technology, it is an issue of breeding. You can through successive breeding of any animal breed the female to have certain traits and the male to have others. We have breed females to have certain traits over thousands of years, and yes they are stuck with it. Sure you can try to breed it out of them, and the new technology revolution will force some of that. But its not going to happen instantly.
Sorry, meant to say 100Mps. Though 100Gps certainly does exist, you wouldn't want to see the bill. Quick googling reveals that "average" SK speeds is 20Mps, but that 50-100 is commonly available for home usage.
Your kidding right? Backbone capacity has been constantly increasing. You have full blown internet TV with 100+Gb connections in places like South Korea with no such issues. Its all about the fact the telcos don't want to invest in the US network, because our laws no longer require them too (pre 90s the law required them to reinvest 90% into infrastructure)
So the issue is, are these opposing viewpoints really wrong, or are they just slandered. I've read a quite a few materials on both sides, and they both seem to offer compelling scientific debate. Just because a viewpoint is often slandered doesn't nessesarily make it wrong. And I definatly don't encourage teaching something simply because the vocal majority want it so.
Sadly, thats a dangerous road to go down. A quick google search will list dozens of major professors who don't agree with Gore. BUT, a google search of each name will turn up a huge list of 9/11 style conspiracy sites listing the criminal associations of these professors. Most often these "criminal" linkings are that they were mentioned positively by the "criminal" washington post. Now you tell me HOW is someone supposed to publish something againsts Gore's theories and not get published by the washington post, I don't know...
Ashamed that the school is required to present alterative scientific viewpoints.. This isn't exactly the evolution debate in which the schools were being forced to provide unscientific things. geez
Yes, there are a bunch of unnessesary patches on MS's support website that require you call support to get. Either way MS has already spent the programming time neccesary to fix this problem, so its not like its costing MS money to provide the general public with this patch. They are just trying to force upgrades.
It doesn't but if your application goes from constructing round swimming pools to round oceans (stupid example) you might want to change pi from 3.14 to 3.1415926 or even more.
Its become a common thing for MS to do lately. If there is a fix that only affects a handful of customers they will NOT release it publicly. You either have to get a support contract or call their support line and pay for the call. Its quite sickening, especially for a near monopoly organization. I've seen a number of updates on their website that would be nice to have but I'm not going to call them to get it...
I think the idea is set it in a configuration file. Still stupid, but the point was don't set in hard code something that might change. Most industries don't have a capability to recompile code.
No because it was 30 pictures among 40 independantly scoring judges. 1200 samples in all.
Yes they could have done for more women. But personally I think it was stupid to "obscure" the faces, I'd bet their results would would have been higher**
**Assuming the study was right in the first place.
I repeat you can start earning 5% interest on your paypal balance by selecting the "stock" option. This does include some potential risk of loss though if paypal ever tanks, than again as its not FDIC insured everyone else does as well.
Um you do know that with a click of a button you can start getting 5% interest from paypal for your balances.. Right..
You have to opt into their "stock" account which simply means that you accept additional risk that if paypal loses value, you may lose money as well. So far its paying out a constant 5% interest for the year I've had it.
Yea the visible universe is some 46 billions light years. They are referring to detecting individual starts a billion light years away whereby normally you would only see a galaxy with non identifiable individuals stars at such a distance.
Nope the game|life site specifically states that is a wired controller because there was too much latency in the wireless. Apparently Microsoft wouldn't give them the proper specs. They state that they are reverse engineering the specs and expect to release a wireless controller soon though obviously not as the default controller with the game.
Its really about weighing your opportunities. Sure if you telecommute your chances of promotion within your company are much lower. But a telecommuter is more of an independent agent anyways. If your telecommuting you can work multiple jobs much easier. Don't consider yourself tied to that one employer, consider yourself a free agent, even if your not..
I think your referring to "Independence Day"
They were directed and written by the same people.
Don't be "sorry" I could see the link pointed to http://butipoopfromthere.ytmnd.com/
:)
So no REAL surprises, but not being able to close your browser if someone happens to pop into the room is dangerous!
Well they certainly don't have to be distinct, because then 25 would be prime. You mean two numbers that are distinct from the original.
You know that link wouldn't be so bad, if it didn't freeze your browser for a minute so you can't just close it.
Ehh, bullshit. My daughter simply isn't interested in tech even though I encourage her. My son might be, or he might not.. He's only 3. Now I bet there are plenty of families out there that the reverse is the case, but not everyone is hardwired for IT. Partially it IS genetics, even if there isn't anything strictly female about technology, it is an issue of breeding. You can through successive breeding of any animal breed the female to have certain traits and the male to have others. We have breed females to have certain traits over thousands of years, and yes they are stuck with it. Sure you can try to breed it out of them, and the new technology revolution will force some of that. But its not going to happen instantly.
Sorry, meant to say 100Mps. Though 100Gps certainly does exist, you wouldn't want to see the bill.
Quick googling reveals that "average" SK speeds is 20Mps, but that 50-100 is commonly available for home usage.
Assuming they aren't physically holding them hostage, yes its their right to work in a sweatshop if they want to... :)
Your kidding right? Backbone capacity has been constantly increasing. You have full blown internet TV with 100+Gb connections in places like South Korea with no such issues. Its all about the fact the telcos don't want to invest in the US network, because our laws no longer require them too (pre 90s the law required them to reinvest 90% into infrastructure)
So the issue is, are these opposing viewpoints really wrong, or are they just slandered. I've read a quite a few materials on both sides, and they both seem to offer compelling scientific debate. Just because a viewpoint is often slandered doesn't nessesarily make it wrong. And I definatly don't encourage teaching something simply because the vocal majority want it so.
Sadly, thats a dangerous road to go down. A quick google search will list dozens of major professors who don't agree with Gore. BUT, a google search of each name will turn up a huge list of 9/11 style conspiracy sites listing the criminal associations of these professors. Most often these "criminal" linkings are that they were mentioned positively by the "criminal" washington post. Now you tell me HOW is someone supposed to publish something againsts Gore's theories and not get published by the washington post, I don't know...
Sorry, I was refering to Gore's theories specifically. He states many extreme views that plenty of climate scientist don't agree on.
Ashamed that the school is required to present alterative scientific viewpoints.. This isn't exactly the evolution debate in which the schools were being forced to provide unscientific things. geez
Yes, there are a bunch of unnessesary patches on MS's support website that require you call support to get. Either way MS has already spent the programming time neccesary to fix this problem, so its not like its costing MS money to provide the general public with this patch. They are just trying to force upgrades.
It doesn't but if your application goes from constructing round swimming pools to round oceans (stupid example) you might want to change pi from 3.14 to 3.1415926 or even more.
Its become a common thing for MS to do lately. If there is a fix that only affects a handful of customers they will NOT release it publicly. You either have to get a support contract or call their support line and pay for the call. Its quite sickening, especially for a near monopoly organization. I've seen a number of updates on their website that would be nice to have but I'm not going to call them to get it...
I think the idea is set it in a configuration file. Still stupid, but the point was don't set in hard code something that might change. Most industries don't have a capability to recompile code.
No because it was 30 pictures among 40 independantly scoring judges. 1200 samples in all.
Yes they could have done for more women. But personally I think it was stupid to "obscure" the faces, I'd bet their results would would have been higher**
**Assuming the study was right in the first place.
Sorry thanks, I couldn't remember what it was and a quick look at my paypal didn't reveal the name anymore...
I repeat you can start earning 5% interest on your paypal balance by selecting the "stock" option. This does include some potential risk of loss though if paypal ever tanks, than again as its not FDIC insured everyone else does as well.
Um you do know that with a click of a button you can start getting 5% interest from paypal for your balances.. Right..
You have to opt into their "stock" account which simply means that you accept additional risk that if paypal loses value, you may lose money as well. So far its paying out a constant 5% interest for the year I've had it.
star sorry that T sneaked in there somehow.
Yea the visible universe is some 46 billions light years. They are referring to detecting individual starts a billion light years away whereby normally you would only see a galaxy with non identifiable individuals stars at such a distance.
You obviously don't get the idea of an "independent" game festival. Slamdance was created by Sundance. They EXPECT edgy social commentary.
Nope the game|life site specifically states that is a wired controller because there was too much latency in the wireless. Apparently Microsoft wouldn't give them the proper specs. They state that they are reverse engineering the specs and expect to release a wireless controller soon though obviously not as the default controller with the game.