Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: Do You Still Have a Pager? Do You Find It Useful?

New submitter Chance Callahan writes: I am starting a business, helping a friend with his own startup, and volunteering regularly with a major political campaign (#feelthebern). One thing I have noticed is that my phone likes to die at the most inconvenient times and leaves me out of touch with people. With the business I'm starting requiring clients to be able to get ahold me quickly, I have been seriously considering getting a two-way pager. It's much easier swap out a AA battery once a month then to worry "will client X be able to get ahold me in the event of an emergency?" So, Slashdot, the million dollar question is, in the age of cell phones, do you have a pager? Do you still find it useful? Do any other "dead-tech" tools still play a big role for your communications? For example, fax machines are still big in Japan, and a lot of people keep landlines, too.

307 comments

  1. Extra battery? by pz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why not buy one of those easy-to-find extra battery USB-charger things and carry that with you instead?

    --

    Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    1. Re:Extra battery? by captjc · · Score: 1

      I keep seeing them on Kinja for like $10 - $20. Some of them even have built in flashlights and whatnot. Sounds much more useful than a pager IMO.

      --
      Slow Down Cowboy! It's been 1 hour, 47 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment
    2. Re:Extra battery? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are also after-market batteries that have extended life better than the stock battery. I have had very good luck with those (lasting 1.5 to 1.75 times longer than stock batteries) as long as they are seasoned properly at the beginning.

    3. Re:Extra battery? by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      Why not buy one of those easy-to-find extra battery USB-charger things and carry that with you instead?

      This is a much better solution than having to give all the contacts another number to try you at if your phone's dead.
      If you're going to carry an extra device, might has well make it 99% battery/device ratio.

      Also -- should have been a better shopper when picking your phone. I recommend the phone finder at GSMArena to narrow down requirements (including talk/standby time for the battery).

    4. Re:Extra battery? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      or just some 101 or whatever nokia s30 device you find..
      it's like a pager. except cheaper monthly cost and can call on it.

      nobody uses pagers unless theres some burocratic or regulation reason anymore..

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    5. Re:Extra battery? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cause with a batterypack a cellphone is still a cellphone...?

    6. Re:Extra battery? by Phreakiture · · Score: 3, Informative

      I would like to suggest one better: If your phone is one that allows you to remove the batter (i.e. not an Apple or a OnePlus or a few others), just get a spare battery of the type that the phone takes. When your phone dies, reach into your pocket, pull out the spare battery, and switch it for the one that is in the phone. It's instant, efficient, and doesn't require you to juggle your phone plus another box for whatever length of time it takes your phone to charge.

      Additionally (and this is good for all phones), if you are traveling much by car, get a cigarette-lighter charger for your phone. Plug it in whenever you are in your car.

      --
      www.wavefront-av.com
    7. Re:Extra battery? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would like to suggest one better: If your phone is one that allows you to remove the batter (i.e. not an Apple or a OnePlus or a few others), just get a spare battery of the type that the phone takes.

      I'm given to understand that iPhones have third-party cases that contain a supplemental battery available for it.

    8. Re:Extra battery? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or a phone with decent battery life. My BB goes 2 days. Everyone makes fun of it until they ask to borrow it to make calls.

    9. Re:Extra battery? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      iPhone battery life is not great especially if you do a lot of stuff on your phone. When it's plugged in charging, the iPhone is not in my pocket. I'm usually all over the place during the day. My phone is charging at my desk, but I'm not there and miss stuff. I also have small charger that's about the size of my thumb. But this requires a wire to be attached between the phone the charger. It's real clunkly. It doesn't all fit in one handle easily. It would be nice to have a phone that can last for a few days or be able to swap batteries on the fly. But this is not the case with iPhones. Plus you have to remember to charge it each night.

    10. Re:Extra battery? by jafiwam · · Score: 1

      iPhone battery life is not great especially if you do a lot of stuff on your phone. When it's plugged in charging, the iPhone is not in my pocket. I'm usually all over the place during the day. My phone is charging at my desk, but I'm not there and miss stuff. I also have small charger that's about the size of my thumb. But this requires a wire to be attached between the phone the charger. It's real clunkly. It doesn't all fit in one handle easily. It would be nice to have a phone that can last for a few days or be able to swap batteries on the fly. But this is not the case with iPhones. Plus you have to remember to charge it each night.

      Do you know how to shut down apps on your iPhone? (insert curse about apple not having shit for manuals here)

      Double tap the home button and swipe up on all the stuff that appears. If you shut things down, the battery lasts much longer.

    11. Re:Extra battery? by del_diablo · · Score: 1

      iPhones still have pretty horrible battery compared to cheap low end dumb phones.
      iPhone is at 4-5 days, IF you turn off data roaming, 3G/4G and GPS for all apps except Camera and calender.
      Dumbphone is at 6-14 days depending on model, or 4-5 with realworld usage.

    12. Re:Extra battery? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or, since he's #feelingtheberning (they make creams for that, yanno), take the phone or charger from someone else.

    13. Re:Extra battery? by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

      They are. I have a 15000 mAh unit; two, 2.4 ampere outputs. Wouldn't be without it, can't really, at least unless the companies making the cellphones stop putting too-small batteries in them. last weekend I drove five hours, during about 3 of which we were either completely out of contact or only in distant contact with a cell tower (Montana... lots and lots of empty space.) When we left the city, my phone was at 25%. I kept the phone (a Galaxy Note III with an aftermarket "big" battery that's good for about 48 hours here, where we're within about 4 miles of a cell tower) plugged into the external unit for the entire trip, and when we got home, the phone was at 100% and the external unit at 45%, which allowed for both charging it and running it.

      Really, won't even consider being without that external unit. As for a pager... no. Just no.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    14. Re: Extra battery? by nachtelfjeiu · · Score: 1

      Much easier still: get a phone with a replaceable battery. When you're on the go, it's pretty annoying to have your phone connected to a charger for several hours. Just pop in a new battery, boot up (1m nowadays) and you're good to go.

    15. Re:Extra battery? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm glad CmdrTaco never created a '-1: Wrong' mod; replying AC instead.

      Anyway, you're wrong.

    16. Re:Extra battery? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple has highly detailed manuals for their products, and they're perfectly readable in iBooks on the iPhone itself. the iOS one runs to 300 pages: https://support.apple.com/manuals/ Don't assume things that aren't true.

    17. Re:Extra battery? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And here's another article that also mentions background app refresh; its introduction didn't change the fact that 'quitting apps' is a myth.

    18. Re:Extra battery? by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      You go on a lot of two day trips where a wall socket wasn't available? And on these trips, the cigarette lighter must not work and can't send out a charge.

    19. Re:Extra battery? by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      would like to suggest one better: If your phone is one that allows you to remove the batter (i.e. not an Apple or a OnePlus or a few others), just get a spare battery of the type that the phone takes. When your phone dies, reach into your pocket, pull out the spare battery, and switch it for the one that is in the phone. It's instant, efficient, and doesn't require you to juggle your phone plus another box for whatever length of time it takes your phone to charge./blockquote>

      And how do you charge the spare battery? Do you expect people to plug in the phone, wait two hours for it to charge, then swap the batteries and charge it again?

      And that's the problem with removable batteries. In the early days of AMPS phones, yes, the charging dock had spare slots for extra batteries so you can charge the phone's battery and one or two spares at the same time without having to swap them.

      These days, the vast majority of phones only have the phone itself to charge the battery (some phones do have dock accessories that let you charge a battery outside the phone), so to charge spare batteries entails remembering to periodically check the phone, see the battery is full, then swap the battery and put the phone on charge again. Forget to do this and you'll find you have been carrying a spare battery that's dead.

      With an external pack, they always can charge at the same time as the phone - just get another charger, and put both on charge together. No worrying about waiting for the phone to finish charging then swapping batteries - both will charge simultaneously and it'll be ready in the morning.

      Plus, if you're carrying batteries in your pocket, you worry about them shorting out. External batteries are protected against that.at least by random keys and such you find in pockets.

    20. Re:Extra battery? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You were driving so I presume you were in a car. Why didn't you have a cigarette lighter charger for your phone? While I have and use backup batteries when I need to I also have a charger outlet in my vehicle as that makes much more sense when driving.

    21. Re:Extra battery? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      charging case?

      Was that so hard?

    22. Re:Extra battery? by SQLGuru · · Score: 1

      I even have a battery that includes a wi-fi hub for sharing data (unfortunately, it doesn't include a network jack and the wireless network it creates is local and only useful for file sharing).....but those batteries are really easy to find. Most of them will even fully charge a phone two or three times.

    23. Re:Extra battery? by BradMajors · · Score: 1

      This is a much better solution than having to give all the contacts another number to try you at if your phone's dead.

      I set up my pager to receive a copy of my important emails. No additional contact information required.

    24. Re:Extra battery? by pz · · Score: 1

      Holy crap, I got a first post AND a 5, Insightful? How often does that happen?

      --

      Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    25. Re:Extra battery? by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      I have a hand cranked charger which also has a very decent flashlight and a radio. No need to replace disposable cells, just wind it for 30 seconds for 8 hours' continuous use and replace a lithium pile every five years or so. Easy life.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    26. Re:Extra battery? by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      Motorola V3i for the win.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    27. Re:Extra battery? by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

      I do have a 12v charger that's meant to charge this phone in a vehicle. However, with the larger battery in the phone, the car charger doesn't get the job done. I've not found a charger for the car that can handle the phone's aftermarket battery. Keep hoping to find one, though. Know of any?

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    28. Re: Extra battery? by Lenny369 · · Score: 0

      The car charger should be quicker than any other, at 2.2amps, because they do not have to invert ac to dc which produces heat. Get a new charger.

    29. Re: Extra battery? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Converting AC to DC can easily be 99% efficient, as short of massive kW power, you're dealing with just a diode voltage drop. The major loss of efficiency is converting voltages in a switching power supply. It is easy to make a 2 A @ 5 V power supply 90-95% efficient when running from a 120 AC source. Switching power supplies tend to be more efficient for a higher input voltage (less on time, less current). Considering car chargers tend to be cheap aftermarket parts too that cut corners, they can be lucky to keep a modern phone charged when the screen is on.

    30. Re:Extra battery? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If not being able to charge the battery externally is your main problem, and this was a really important issue to always have a working phone, maybe you should just buy two cheap, reliable phones and swap the SIM card when one runs low. It will take up about the same space as the larger external batteries, require no wire, and provide a backup in case you break your phone and can't wait to pick up or get shipped a replacement. Or get two different phones, one for surfing the web and whatever else you do that isn't just basic but critical email and phone call. Then you have an important phone that isn't tempting to waste battery life on things that are not important to your business.

    31. Re:Extra battery? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      When you find a cell phone battery that lasts 60-90 days like a pager battery, then you might be on to something. But suggesting something that extends his phone's battery life from one day to two days simply shows a lack of reading comprehension.

    32. Re:Extra battery? by Bender+Unit+22 · · Score: 1

      I had the same problem. And I ended up buying the one recommended here:
      http://thewirecutter.com/revie...
      Although I was careful do buy the right one, I suspect that I got a fake or something because when I used it for charging 2 devices recently, it didn't seem to work right. But my phone battery also was on it's last leg so I have just got the battery replaced and might need to test it again with 2 devices. :)

      But apparently, some of the car chargers that say they can output more watts,can't always do it and they don't always work with the way the phones communicate with the charger, so you have to look at which phone you have.

    33. Re:Extra battery? by greenfruitsalad · · Score: 1

      buy a backup Nokia/Samsung/whatevz feature phone. it will last you a week on a single charge with many hours of calls.

      I keep a spare Nokia 215 in my bag with an extra battery. The phone cost me 10 euro and the spare battery 9.50. On paper: 700 hours standby, 20 hours talk time.

      sure i look like a tool when i use it, but at least i have a phone i can rely on when i travel. there's now Nokia 230, which doesn't look like a toy and still has 650 hours standby time and 23 hours talk time. I'll probably upgrade to that one.

    34. Re:Extra battery? by daw1234 · · Score: 1

      I don't think this takes into account some eccentricities in some apps. The Avaya OneX Mobile app in a version released in 2015 would reduce battery life to a couple of hours (with the phone getting rather hot) while running in the background on IOS. I've read multiple articles telling me this can't happen but it did.

    35. Re:Extra battery? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can get an external battery that will plug into your usb socket and would work with any phone.

    36. Re: Extra battery? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have an original Samsung charger, which is rated at 2.1A. Watch out if you have a charger with a separate cable. Often it's the cable that limits the Amps. Get one of Amazon's own brand, even the long ones do 2.1A.

    37. Re:Extra battery? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a cigarette lighter does not hold a charge. It has no battery. It can't send out a charge.

    38. Re:Extra battery? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Op here,

      Funny, I have a 5200 mAH after market battery in my S4 and the small 2 port cigarette lighter charger, which is barely larger than the power port it plugs into, can charge both it and my 10.1 in. tablet at the same time. Even when I'm running navigation on my phone. Sounds like you got a cheap charger. There are even better ones than what I have but they tend to be larger.

      The lighter socket provides much more current than any phone will need so all you need in a charger is a regulator with a decent current rating and noise filtration. Those are easy to design in a small package nowadays.

    39. Re: Extra battery? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple even has their own now

    40. Re:Extra battery? by quetwo · · Score: 1

      You see them in hospitals all the time because the hospital can own the pager system (not have to pay a monthly fee to anybody), and they can guarantee the uptime and coverage -- things you can't do with a cell phone.

    41. Re:Extra battery? by quetwo · · Score: 1

      For work, I still carry the Motorola Droid Maxx. which was built as a durable, long-lasting phone. I don't do many apps on it, but it lasts ~ 6-8 days, depending how much I'm on the phone (usually about an hour a day). This means I only have to charge it on the weekends.

      My old flip-phone, which this thing replaced, would easily last 7-14 days depending on how much I was on the phone. I think the box of my old flip-phone listed 20 days of battery for standby....

    42. Re: Extra battery? by zaphirplane · · Score: 1

      Wow a question is asked, its answered almost everyone agrees.
      With little or no trolling, abuse. Shocking shocking

    43. Re:Extra battery? by einsteinbutthole · · Score: 1

      flip phones don't look nearly as tool-ish as a fucking 7" tablet against your head.

    44. Re:Extra battery? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get a battery charger, you should be able to get a universal one for under $10.

    45. Re:Extra battery? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A pager is a good way for us paranoids to keep from being continuously tracked. My phone is never on unless I need to phone someone.

    46. Re:Extra battery? by MtViewGuy · · Score: 1

      Look, when Apple now offers their own battery case (love it or not the design of the case, though) for the iPhone 6/6s and 6+/6s+ models, there's a lot less excuse for running out of battery charge. And unlike a Mophie Juice Pack, the way the charging system works doesn't require a manual switching of charging the iPhone's battery when the iPhone battery runs low.

    47. Re: Extra battery? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahmen, woooosh

    48. Re:Extra battery? by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Indeed. I have a 50000mAh unit I bought off Amazon for about 16 Euros. Apparently they use refurbished notebook batteries or something. Either way, it does precisely what it advertises. I can charge my phone completely over 10 times without having to recharge it. It's small enough to fit in my jacket pocket, and works a treat. It has two USB charging outputs, one being 2.1A, which is fine for me. I also have a set of JBL Charge 2 speakers which also have a built-in battery capable of charging my phone once or twice. External batteries make all the difference.

    49. Re: Extra battery? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neat, but the least important thing about my smartphone is that it's a phone. In fact I'd be happy to uninstall the phone app completely.

  2. Yes considering how poor cell coverage is! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Where I work in downtown Seattle, cell coverage doesn't work at all below ground or in our office building if you're not near a window. We have to still use pagers.

    1. Re: Yes considering how poor cell coverage is! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This. Cellphones, like wireless Ethernet, use frequencies that are just too high to penetrate. I think our pager system is 26MHz, and works even in the bottom of our parking garage.

    2. Re: Yes considering how poor cell coverage is! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And 5GHz Ethernet is even more unless. It won't even penetrate our cube walls. We have 9 APs to cover about 8,500 sq ft, and we still have dead spots.

    3. Re: Yes considering how poor cell coverage is! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Ours are 35.2MHz which works well in our entire building unlike cellphones.

    4. Re: Yes considering how poor cell coverage is! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can install your own MicroCells to fix the problem. We just spent about $200k to install about 150 of them from AT&T in our building, and now we have complete coverage. The problem here in Seattle is the NIMBYs that don't want to see antennas.

    5. Re: Yes considering how poor cell coverage is! by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Or you can just switch to a carrier that allows wi-fi calling, such as T-Mobile. A lot cheaper than $200K.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    6. Re: Yes considering how poor cell coverage is! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're assuming wireless Ethernet will work better through reinforced concrete walls. It doesn't.

    7. Re: Yes considering how poor cell coverage is! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's sad that the IEEE is so focused on making wireless ethernet faster rather than more reliable.

    8. Re: Yes considering how poor cell coverage is! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Our building has 1,200 access points. A single one 100' off of the ground will cover about 60% of the area, but making it reliable everywhere and to support enough devices took over a thousand times that many access points!

    9. Re: Yes considering how poor cell coverage is! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The NIMBY people here just won't allow enough cells.

    10. Re: Yes considering how poor cell coverage is! by omnichad · · Score: 5, Funny

      It won't even penetrate our cube walls

      You're supposed to drill through the wall before you try to run Ethernet through it.

    11. Re:Yes considering how poor cell coverage is! by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      What is the AC spam about living in Seattle with slow internet access (and now poor cell coverage)? Does someone have a grudge against the Seattle local government or something?

    12. Re: Yes considering how poor cell coverage is! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This. I have three APs to cover my two bedroom condo. Yes, it's fast but something needs to be done to increase range, especially through walls.

    13. Re: Yes considering how poor cell coverage is! by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      Not sure what kind of cubes you guys have, but for us (similar size space, 8x7' workstations), a single Ubiquity AC-Lite access point in the center of the office easily covers everything... with measurements taken on the floor in corners, and the access point on 5GHz only.

      Of course we have three to be able to reduce power on each and improve throughput, but not for coverage.

    14. Re:Yes considering how poor cell coverage is! by Brigadier · · Score: 1

      I once worked at a university wherein most of there labs were below ground. A major concern became the lack of cell service below ground. We have come to a point in society where buildings need cell repeaters installed in these areas as it is becoming a life safety issue. Good Luck

    15. Re:Yes considering how poor cell coverage is! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've worked in several university labs too that had horrible cell service. Some combination of the construction of older buildings and there being a lot of metal around from wiring and shielded labs can really mess with the signal even in the next building over from mutlipath problems. Safety issues weren't addressed by repeaters, but by the same way it had in the past: hard lines accessible in critical areas with a big sign that gave the room number or location designation. The really critical areas with potential major safety issues had special alarm buttons or phones that auto connected to emergency services. Considering the amount of protection the phone wiring had to protect it from fire and to stop fire from spreading along conduits, any situation that took those phones out of service would be server enough to have the fire department already on their way. Personnel were trained where phones and emergency equipment was, and local fire departments did a walk through twice a year to be trained about hazards so they could deal with things without further instruction in an emergency.

      I'm not sure how cell repeaters help much, and for the amount you spend on one and the chances of it still not being as reliable as hard lines, you could instead spend that money on improving a lot of other safety things, outside of some really unusual settings.

    16. Re: Yes considering how poor cell coverage is! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More reliable for whom? For businesses and other large public spaces with large numbers of users, the cost of extra stations is minor compared to labor. But the larger number of shorter range bases is more reliable for many users in a dense environment. For residential users, if you complain about range, you can still buy base stations that use lower frequencies, so what is IEEE supposed to do in that situation? If you complain about how consumer base stations tend to be crap with bad software, that has nothing to do with the standards as the same companies can sell rock solid base stations to businesses... so what is the IEEE supposed to do there too?

    17. Re: Yes considering how poor cell coverage is! by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Cellphones, like wireless Ethernet, use frequencies that are just too high to penetrate. I think our pager system is 26MHz, and works even in the bottom of our parking garage.

      Wherever my cellphone doesn't get a signal, I can stick a $20 WiFi AP and still get my calls, texts and data (T-Mobile, Republic Wireless, etc.) With more primitive phones and services, a wireless repeater with a nice big antenna only costs a few hundred dollars.

      Good luck plugging the holes in your pager service coverage area...

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    18. Re: Yes considering how poor cell coverage is! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please just say wifi

    19. Re:Yes considering how poor cell coverage is! by volmtech · · Score: 1

      My son was a student at the University of West Florida. The dorms all had cell repeaters.

    20. Re: Yes considering how poor cell coverage is! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      802.11 != "wireless ethernet".

  3. Just get rid of your pretty iPhone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are phones with big batteries, even with swappable batteries, which won't leave you in the lurch. For that matter, you can carry a battery the size of a fat cigarette pack which will quickly recharge your pretty-fone.

  4. Seriously?? by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 0

    "Do You Still Have a Pager? Do You Find It Useful?"

    "No", and "hell no".

    Why not just carry a phone? I really don't see what advantage a pager has over a phone these days, to be honest.

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    1. Re:Seriously?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps an old candybar phone that has good battery life, and able to receive SMS messages and calls will do? Or a battery charger for the main smartphone? Or two smartphones?

    2. Re:Seriously?? by Brett+Buck · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A phone cannot be carried into a secure area. A (one-way) pager can.

    3. Re:Seriously?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems like he kind of spells out the advantage of the pager in the post.

    4. Re:Seriously?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The battery on a phone lasts 8-12 hours. The battery on a pager lasts for a month.

    5. Re:Seriously?? by Phreakiture · · Score: 2

      I know people don't RTFA, but at least RTFS.

      --
      www.wavefront-av.com
    6. Re:Seriously?? by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      True, and so 0.0001% of the population will benefit from this.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    7. Re:Seriously?? by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      Perhaps don't go into secure areas when you're worried about your startup clients contacting you?

    8. Re:Seriously?? by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      I know people don't RTFA, but at least RTFS.

      Lol, this is slashdot, not some "news" site with interesting and informative articles.

      I'd have to give back my "Never Read A Summary" badge if I started reading summaries all willy-nilly.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    9. Re:Seriously?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> "Do You Still Have a Pager? Do You Find It Useful?"
      > "No", and "hell no".
      > Why not just carry a phone? I really don't see what advantage a pager has over a phone these days, to be honest.

      I see you live in a wonderful place. Where I live cell phone signals not only have poor coverage inside big buildings (malls, for instance), which is dumb, because the youngsters these days avoid places without 3G, some operators actually disconnect you after a long while without use.

      I had a couple of phones which stopped working because of that. Colleagues with the same operator had normal service meanwhile; upon restart, my cellphone would choose another tower and everything would be ok.

      And they still sell you a service to retrieve your voice messages in case you miss a call. Can you believe it? A mobile company making money on you when they fail?

      Those things are what makes me say there's no real communism in reality, nor real capitalism.

    10. Re:Seriously?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL.....my last 5 jobs (since 2003), I've had to carry a pager....and currently carry two. Cell phones are not reliable....and neither are pagers, but pagers >> cell phones especially in concrete buildings. If you have to be reachable at all times

      Do I like them?...They still suck, but I find it easier to ignore them for a few minutes if I happen to be in the royal throne room. :-/

    11. Re: Seriously?? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      >I really don't see what advantage a pager has over a phone these days

      Look at the Verizon coverage map. You only exist in the red areas. Some of us need to exist in the white areas.

      But be sure to multiplex all alerts to pager and SMS - pager frequencies have fewer holes but they can exist. I've never missed an alert that went to both.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    12. Re:Seriously?? by Alypius · · Score: 1

      Hahaha! Summaries?! Bwahaha! I consider it a Good Day when commenters read the title!

    13. Re:Seriously?? by lgw · · Score: 1

      Put simply: pagers are amazingly reliable, and have nearly perfect coverage. In ideal circumstances, a pager adds nothing to a phone. In real-world circumstances, it does.

      After all, if you're sitting at your desk where you made sure you have good cell phone coverage, you also have email and IM and so on, and the phone itself is almost redundant. But when you're at some random customer site, or driving through some place cell coverage is sparse, or in a variety of little cell-coverage dark spots, the pager just works.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    14. Re:Seriously?? by FaxeTheCat · · Score: 3, Interesting

      An extra cheap non.smar phone easily lasts a week on a charge.

    15. Re:Seriously?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The summary makes as much sense as: I find that my bottled water frequently runs out since I've started shampooing on the go. I am about to start hiking in the desert and I wonder if I should carry saline IV bags to try to treat my inevitable dehydration that will occur after I've shampooed 3 times in the morning. Will you make me feel better about my analysis?

    16. Re:Seriously?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I disagree here are probably more than circa 300 people in the USA that work in secure facilities that sometimes need to be contacted quickly, and thus pager would be an alternative. That said, vanishingly few things are important enough that they cannot wait until the end of an 8hr shift.

    17. Re:Seriously?? by Hizonner · · Score: 3, Informative
      1. Battery life is what started this. Battery life on pagers is better than battery life on any phone, even the simplest. And replacement batteries are everywhere.
      2. Coverage is better inside buildings and in other hard to reach places. Many posters mentioned this before you posted.
      3. Somebody already replied to you about "secure areas".
      4. One-way pagers, at least, don't track or report your location; the page is just broadcast over the whole coverage area.
      5. Pagers can be physically smaller than any phone.
      6. Somebody further down mentioned the reliability advantages of being on a totally separate network from the cell network. You CAN have both.
      7. Pager software is simpler and therefore at least possibly more secure, even than the simplest phones.
      8. Pager hardware is slightly cheaper, which may matter if you expect you might break it.
    18. Re:Seriously?? by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      The summary makes as much sense as: I find that my bottled water frequently runs out since I've started shampooing on the go. I am about to start hiking in the desert and I wonder if I should carry saline IV bags to try to treat my inevitable dehydration that will occur after I've shampooed 3 times in the morning. Will you make me feel better about my analysis?

      Smart hikers will just recycle their urine. Carry some powdered Kool-Aid to give it some flavor, and you'll be all set.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    19. Re:Seriously?? by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      Put simply: pagers are amazingly reliable, and have nearly perfect coverage.

      This is true, but after carrying a pager for years I switched to a phone and never missed it. If I get a text message it'll pop up as soon as I'm back in coverage.

      For critical notifications, yes, it would be (is) better, but I think that relatively few people overall require that kind of service. Doctors and other emergency personnel, people on 24-hour call...sure. But for 99.999% of use cases I think it's not an issue. I'm not telling anyone not to carry a pager, I just think that it's a niche requirement these days for the most part.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    20. Re:Seriously?? by BradMajors · · Score: 1

      Pagers can be much smaller than a cell phone and have a much longer battery life.

    21. Re:Seriously?? by geoskd · · Score: 1

      True, and so 0.0001% of the population will benefit from this.

      The other 99% of the population would benefit enormously if that 0.0001% could bring the smart phone in...

      --
      I wish I had a good sig, but all the good ones are copyrighted
    22. Re:Seriously?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For a lot less than the cost of maintaining a wide spread pager system and paying for time to a service when you are not in that secure area, you could just pay a single person to hold on to everyone's phone and issue shared, local pagers that they page when a phone gets a call...

    23. Re:Seriously?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps don't go into secure areas when you're worried about your startup clients contacting you?

      Perhaps do a better job explaining to your clients the government-mandated security restrictions surrounding your job?

      My phone is enough of an electronic leash, thank you very much. A lack of communication is a shitty excuse to turn it into an even larger one.

    24. Re:Seriously?? by Sax+Russell+5449D29A · · Score: 1

      I disagree here are probably more than circa 300 people in the USA that work in secure facilities that sometimes need to be contacted quickly, and thus pager would be an alternative. That said, vanishingly few things are important enough that they cannot wait until the end of an 8hr shift.

      I think you meant ~32.000. :-)

      The only restrictions I've come across regarding phones are when you enter a nuclear power plant, you can't have a phone with a camera on it. Everything else is fine, it's just the camera. Things may have changed, though.

      --
      -SR
    25. Re:Seriously?? by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

      Less worries when sharing a pager within a group. Nobody is going to find any weird stuff in the browser history or strange apps downloaded.

      Speaking of which it could be cheaper for companies to use pagers. One place I was working had sent out a notice asking people to cut down on the browsing because the data costs were getting too expensive on the mobile phones. We only had them to get alerts from the servers so pagers would have worked fine but since they got us phones many people were doing their personal browsing and downloading apps on them.

    26. Re:Seriously?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Put simply: pagers are amazingly reliable, and have nearly perfect coverage.

      I have had a skytel account since 2011, and carry it for backup with a phone. ~500 of my coworkers also do, and we share experiences. Simply put: you are on crack (or you need to specify what kind of pager you're using). Skytel pager coverage is much worse than any cell carrier.

    27. Re:Seriously?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For every secure industrial facility I've had to enter, it's the camera that's the problem, and that would include laptop cameras, too. So, just get a cheap camera-free smartphone and forward calls from your day-to-day phone. If you're only in secure areas infrequently, put the extra phone on a pay-go provider. Alternatively, swap the SIM cards (unless you're on Sprint). Easy, and not that expensive for someone who has that kind of need.

      - T

  5. What's wrong with your cell phone? by guruevi · · Score: 1

    Get a more reliable cell phone (either a simple feature-phone or iPhone), a car and extra desk chargers. You should only need those extra chargers if you're like me and you forget to charge your phone 2-3 days in a row or you're actually continuously (10h+) dialed in on the phone. There is also a low power mode on iOS which can be manually turned on and disables all non-essential features.

    Not sure how you manage to have a phone with less than a half day of life. Paying for a pager and having your customers learn how to use it is ludicrous, even if it's a voicemail, most people will refuse to 'talk to a machine' regardless.

    --
    Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    1. Re:What's wrong with your cell phone? by mikael_j · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not sure how you manage to have a phone with less than a half day of life.

      My guess is that the OP is like a former boss of mine who would complain constantly about the shitty battery life of new phones yet would never charge his phone until it shut itself off because the battery ran low.

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    2. Re:What's wrong with your cell phone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just what I came to say. I have a dumb phone and full charge to death is measured in months or weeks, not days or hours. As a test, I once called my desk phone from the cell and then unplugged the cellphone from power and left for the weekend. The call was still going when I came back on Monday.

    3. Re:What's wrong with your cell phone? by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      I bought a car charger shortly after a several day power outage. I used it a couple times just to try it, and it got lost. I plug it in every night and don't have any problems. I could probably make it 2-3 days most of the time.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    4. Re:What's wrong with your cell phone? by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

      I had problems with my battery life when I was using a bluetooth head set, I'm on the phone probably 5-6 hours a day. It's not a problem with bluetooth turned off using a wired headset.

      My old flip phone was amazing 5-6 hours a day for 2-3 days on a charge and about an hour to charge 100% from completely dead.

    5. Re:What's wrong with your cell phone? by iamacat · · Score: 1

      Get a more reliable cell phone (either a simple feature-phone or iPhone)

      LOL! Obsession with thinness and battery life do NOT go together.

    6. Re:What's wrong with your cell phone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure how you manage to have a phone with less than a half day of life.

      My wife figured this one out. She plays Facebook games on her phone constantly...

    7. Re:What's wrong with your cell phone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bought a car charger shortly after a several day power outage. I used it a couple times just to try it, and it got lost. I plug it in every night and don't have any problems. I could probably make it 2-3 days most of the time.

      Easy way to prevent a car charger from getting lost: stop taking it out of the damn car.

    8. Re:What's wrong with your cell phone? by guruevi · · Score: 1

      Well, in real life, most Androids get a half day of work regardless of the battery you put in it due to a number of continuous background "stuff" that happens and each app doing it's own thing ignoring any central preference. iPhone's in my experience don't have that problem. Google's suggestion (that self-admittedly don't apply to all devices) is to "force apps to shut down", iPhone apps usage of background resources is extremely limited.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    9. Re: What's wrong with your cell phone? by iamacat · · Score: 1

      Did you try uninstalling Facebook and just using mobile web?

    10. Re:What's wrong with your cell phone? by dave420 · · Score: 1

      So much guesswork, so many generalisations. Don't be upset when people ignore posts like that, as people rarely enjoy tilting at the windmills in other peoples' minds.

  6. No. Burn it with Fire. by blueshift_1 · · Score: 2

    Battery Cases, Expansion Battery packs, Modified flux capacitors, Arc reactors, Cold fusion... so many ways to charge?!? You could even rig a charger off a potato if you really wanted to. Anything is better than a pager.

    1. Re:No. Burn it with Fire. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot two stroke gasoline generator.

    2. Re:No. Burn it with Fire. by Shatrat · · Score: 1

      I did the math one time on powering a small network device (~10 watts or so) off potatoes. It's easy to get the required voltage, but to get enough amps you need hundreds of taters. I was very disappointed.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  7. Landline is it for me. by Whorhay · · Score: 2

    I've got a landline, but basically only because my work requires that I have real phone service. I don't keep a cell phone either as in my situation it'd be a waste 99% of the time, or more.

    1. Re:Landline is it for me. by HuskyDog · · Score: 1

      We have a landline at home and have never thought of getting rid of it. Apart from the fact that it is the medium by which our broadband appears there also seem to be some big conveniences which we couldn't achieve with mobiles (which we also have) but perhaps we are behind the times and there are ways around these limitations with using mobiles instead of a landline.

      1) On the land line we have a DECT base station with three handsets scattered around the house. If someone rings then there is a good chance that one of the handsets will be near at hand. If I only had a mobile then I would either have to remember to always carry it with me as I went from room to room (even in my pyjamas) or put up with the fact that it would always ring when I was at the other end of the house and I would have to sprint up or down stairs to answer it. With my advancing years, I neither want to sprint around the house or try to remember to lug my phone from room to room.

      2) Often, relatives don't want to phone a particular family member, but rather the family in general. We could I suppose have yet another mobile which was always at home for this purpose, but otherwise callers would have to make a guess about who is in before deciding which mobile to call.

      3) The batteries thing again. The DECT phones sit on chargers so they always work. Mobiles go flat quick if left on, but by only switching them on when we go out they need charging less often.

    2. Re:Landline is it for me. by iamacat · · Score: 1

      You can get a DECT phone system that connects to multiple cell phones over bluetooth and forwards calls to all handsets.

    3. Re:Landline is it for me. by swb · · Score: 1

      I cut over to a cell-only setup. I bought a box called "X-Link" that you pair via bluetooth and plug into an existing phone jack. It will ring all the old analog phones on the circuit when the phone rings, you can make calls from the analog phones, and it passes caller ID, too.

      It works pretty well, but really, I always have my cell phone with me anymore. It's MORE convenient than any extension because it's within reach.

      Plus, nobody calls much anymore. They text or email. Kids these days.

    4. Re:Landline is it for me. by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      Not only do I have a landline, I use it more than my cell when I'm at home. I'm partially deaf and often I don't hear the cell's ring tone, but the landline is loud enough for me to hear it. Mostly I use the cell for outgoing calls when I'm not at home, and as I'm retired, I don't make that many calls. Still, it's nice to have for emergencies.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    5. Re:Landline is it for me. by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Presumably, you use DSL? You can have DSL service without an active phone number or phone line. I've paid for just the DSL service - and no phone line. There was no phone number attached to it, as far as I know. I tried a regular phone in the jack and while there was a dial-tone, not even an operator was reachable nor was I able to dial a local number. I did not try 911. I do imagine that 911 service worked but I didn't try it.

      So, it's technically possible to have DSL without paying for phone service or having phone service. I was kind of curious about it - as I'd asked, specifically, for no phone number and no phone service. I seem to recall they tried to get me to get a phone anyhow but I didn't. After it was in-service, I tested out of curiosity. As near as I can tell, there was no real "phone" aspect to it at all but I do imagine it still would have worked for the emergency system.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    6. Re:Landline is it for me. by HuskyDog · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm in the UK, so it's ADSL but basically yes. My ISP will supply a line with no phone number which as you suggest only works for emergency calls (999 or 112 here).

      Thinking about it, the various schemes suggested by others for having DECT phones connected to a mobile via Bluetooth are rather clever, but I don't see how it would give me any big advantage over my current arrangement. I'd also need a new mobile as the current one doesn't have Bluetooth. I wouldn't save on line rental as I still need the line for ADSL and the call costs to and from mobiles are higher. A better plan which I have been considering is to go over entirely to VOIP. My ISP will sell me a VOIP service and I already have Asterisk running on my server and connected to my DECT base station which also does SIP. Call costs would be lower than with the landline but the user experience with the DECT phones would stay the same (very important for my better half).

      I could even take advantage of my ISPs SIP2SIM service to get a SIM card which links directly to the same system.

    7. Re:Landline is it for me. by daq+man · · Score: 1

      Yep, these are exactly the reasons why we have a landline. There is this concept of "a family" and it is useful to have a phone number that represents the family unit rather than the individual.

      One reason you missed out was that international calls to/from a cellphone often cost quite a bit more than the same call made from a landline. I have family in the UK and live in the USA. To call them from my cellphone I would have to have an international calling plan at $20 per month. The landline calls are billed per minute and typically I make less than $20 worth of calls to the UK in a month.

    8. Re:Landline is it for me. by daq+man · · Score: 1

      I forgot to add that with four people living in the house we would have to pay the $20 international plan fee per cellphone, so $80 per month. Much more convenient for whoever wants to make an international call to pick up the landline.

    9. Re:Landline is it for me. by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Oh, I kind of understand. I have a land line too. I technically have two but one is set to never actually ring. It does nothing but record inbound messages from the people who read the signs. (It's a long story.) Basically, I've got a lot of land. I have it posted with custom signs that make note that it's open to the public, for various uses, and I ask that they call and say where they went in, what time they will be coming out, and who they are. So, there's that and I have a line that I actually answer.

      I don't know what it's called? It's a base station and there are four handsets. They all came as a kit. They've got individual charging stations. They sync up automatically when you replace the batteries. They're meant for things like factories, they've got rugged handsets. I'm pretty sure Motorola made them. I suspect that they're probably similar, in function at least, to what you have. Gotta be honest here, I don't even know what DECT is and I'm probably not gonna remember if I go look it up. I suspect I have something just like that - it might even be that. I used Google, a few years back, and searched for rugged phone handsets. I spent about an hour finding which features were out there. I bought these. Hopefully, I never have to do it again.

      That said - I do carry a cell phone. That's a number that only certain friends have. I can forward calls to or from it. But, if I could just bring it home, plug it into a cradle, and have it bluetooth to the other phones - them having at least capacity to *answer* on any handset, would be a very interesting feature. I too am retired. I also believe that entropy (perhaps disorder, though I hate a mess) is the natural state. So, easy is good. Some days, I don't want to meander around looking for a phone to answer the call. It's good though, I just turn the ringers off. If I hold two buttons down on the handsets, it turns the ringers off on all of them. Best feature ever.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  8. Communicating via two-way pager? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One thing I have noticed is that my phone likes to die at the most inconvenient times and leaves me out of touch with people. With the business I'm starting requiring clients to be able to get ahold me quickly, I have been seriously considering getting a two-way pager.

    If your phone is dead, how are you planning on getting in touch with your clients quickly? Are you really going to have a conversation via two-way pager?

    I've worked in an on-call position for ~5 years and always carried a cell phone.

    Buy USB power bank/charger for ~$30, don't waste money on a pager + service.

    1. Re:Communicating via two-way pager? by neminem · · Score: 1

      If by ~30, you mean more like 10, then yes. You can get fancy ones for 30 or more, but you can get a simple one that's just a power stick you can plug things into for crazy cheap. I never go anywhere without one or two of them charged and stuck in a bag, just in case.

  9. Who still uses pagers? by mikael_j · · Score: 2

    I mean, I haven't even heard of firefighters or doctors around here using pagers since sometime around the early 00s. Didn't even know they were still a thing.

    --
    Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    1. Re:Who still uses pagers? by psm321 · · Score: 2

      Apparently a lot of doctors still do. There was an article on Slate about it today.
      Given the issues I've seen with coverage and random SMS delays on phones, I'm glad they do.
      http://www.slate.com/articles/...

    2. Re:Who still uses pagers? by dmr001 · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I'm a doctor, we still use pagers, and they suck. On the plus side, an AA battery lasts a month, and reception is not usually an issue. On the minus side, no one seems to be making pagers anymore, so we get reconditioned units. I long for my old indestructible Motorola pager. Buttons get jammed and latches fall off the "new" ones, the display is less than reliable, and I can customize the beeping to grating, annoying, and nerve-wracking.

      We are beginning to investigate smartphone based solutions, which, in order to be compliant with US privacy regulations have expensive recurring monthly charges, and will involve installing and maintaining microcells in our hospitals.

    3. Re:Who still uses pagers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and will involve installing and maintaining microcells in our hospitals.

      and you'll probably still have dead spots and you won't be able to be reached. I walk into any warehouse type store or hostpital and my cell phone drops for 4G to roaming in an instant and even then cuts out altogether most of the time. Also what good are those microcells when you are a block away at lunch in a major city and have additional shitty reception there or in a parking garage? Sounds like a lawsuit waiting to happen.

      Why doesn't someone developing medical devices see this as a market and develop a pager for the medical industry if pagers are no longer being made? What about other industries of people who need to truly be on call 24/7 and not just on call when they have a signal?

    4. Re:Who still uses pagers? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

      You can still buy brand new Motorola Minitors. v and 6's are current. Yep, they're old tech and voice besides. The new once have a bit of memory so you can replay the page which was the biggest issue with the old analogs.

      I just delivered four brand new ones to some ER docs. The youngest one looked at it a bit curiously. I think it's the first time he's seen a pager.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    5. Re:Who still uses pagers? by sribe · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Why doesn't someone developing medical devices see this as a market and develop a pager for the medical industry if pagers are no longer being made?

      It's not the pagers. It's the paging systems. The market has dropped greatly, so maintaining transmitter towers, repeaters, the whole system, is a hard business to be in. Reliability is exactly why some large medical systems run their own metro-wide paging systems.

    6. Re:Who still uses pagers? by avandesande · · Score: 1

      It's a shame nobody has jammed a pager reception circuit in a smart phone. Can't be bigger than a postage stamp.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    7. Re: Who still uses pagers? by nachtelfjeiu · · Score: 1

      Do your pagers also force you to run to a nearby phone when someone tries to call you on your pager? That's even worse and some Dutch hospitals still work that way.

    8. Re:Who still uses pagers? by ilctoh · · Score: 2

      Paramedic here. We still use VHF pagers. They are simple, but reliable and rock solid. They work pretty much everywhere, and a charge will last for days. We have a complementary iPhone/Android app that will receive info when we get dispatched, but that requires an internet connection, and a series of interfaced software products to all work correctly. The pagers are maintained as a fail safe - all they require is a radio and a means of generating the tones required to signal the pager to open the squelch. In a disaster scenario, the necessary equipment can be run reliably off batteries and generators. That's just not the case with smartphone apps right now.

      --
      How many slashes would a slashdot dot, if a slashdot could dot slashes?
    9. Re:Who still uses pagers? by MMC+Monster · · Score: 1

      Our hospital is looking into something called Spok for secure messaging. Should work whereever the cell phone has wifi or cell service. It's a secure texting app that's HIPAA compliant and has desktop/web versions so that the operators or nurses can send us texts without having to use a phone. Added bonus of read receipts and ping-back to the sender (if wanted) if the message isn't read in a timely manner (ie: STAT pages).

      At least that's what our IT guys told me. We haven't gotten it yet.

      --
      Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
    10. Re:Who still uses pagers? by BigDukeSix · · Score: 1

      I still have my original Motorola pager. Whenever they try to give me one of these crappy new pieces of shit, I tell them that I am the doctor they were warned about in their customer service training, and that they should decide how much blood they want to shed. I think that they have actually written it off by now; no one has bugged me about it for a couple of years.

      It is highly amusing to me that young doctors who care about having the newest iThing get jealous of my pager.

    11. Re: Who still uses pagers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where I'm from, all fire fighters carry pagers because of the superior coverage and battery life.

    12. Re:Who still uses pagers? by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I am a doctor as well and I've never, ever, carried one. I've never even had pager service but I have had a cell phone for a lot of years - back when they were bag or car based. I couldn't imagine it. If it's an emergency, call a medical doctor. ;-)

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    13. Re:Who still uses pagers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem isn't the chip, it's the antenna. The lower the frequency, the longer the wire.

    14. Re: Who still uses pagers? by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      Or... they could just call back with their mobile phone? Surely it would actually be quite difficult in a country as tiny as Holland to find a location that isn't covered by cell tower reception.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    15. Re:Who still uses pagers? by info6568 · · Score: 1

      Why not to use WIFI?

      You can create a dedicated network for emergency messaging with particular registered smartphones and WIFI repeaters (if this needs to work "in" the hospital premises). And even to go to the Internet with a careful design.

      And googling around, it seems there is at least one company making pagers: http://criticalresponse.com/ho...

    16. Re:Who still uses pagers? by sribe · · Score: 1

      We are beginning to investigate smartphone based solutions, which, in order to be compliant with US privacy regulations have expensive recurring monthly charges, and will involve installing and maintaining microcells in our hospitals.

      1) Don't you already have microcells in your hospitals? I work with comms folks at a large medical center, and that's one of the things they do, ensure cell coverage throughout their hospitals. I don't know, maybe that's atypical and ahead of the curve or something, but I wouldn't have thought so.

      2) Depends on what you mean by "expensive" recurring charges. There's really no reason that HIPAA compliance should entail expensive charges--but I'm thinking on a per-user basis and you might be thinking the aggregate is expensive. Or you might be talking with vendors who are simply using HIPAA as an excuse to overcharge for what is actually a pretty simple service to provide.

      3) Unlike the typical /. poster, I actually know what I'm talking about here. I'm working on designing and quoting such a thing for a big medical system right now ;-)

      4) Our biggest concern is not cost, it's reliability. Where do all the failures with SMS and iMessage come from--how can we avoid that and deliver top reliability and low latency without draining your battery?

    17. Re: Who still uses pagers? by nachtelfjeiu · · Score: 1

      Actually the coverage is pretty good most everywhere in my country except in hospitals. One big faraday cage it seems.

  10. Get a feature phone, dumbass. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One that only needs a charge a week. Apparently you're the kind of person who can neither configure a smart phone to get through a day with a single charge, nor remember to carry a charged USB power bank, so get a feature phone. You know what's going to happen if you rely on a pager, don't you? Nobody will know how to contact you on that.

    1. Re: Get a feature phone, dumbass. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because people who think like you are too dumb to figure out how a pager works?

    2. Re: Get a feature phone, dumbass. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I could, but his clients couldn't, and even if they could, they wouldn't want that extra hurdle in an emergency. He wants a customer-facing way of getting in contact with him. Using a pager for that is just dumb, especially if he normally uses his phone and only wants the pager for when the phone battery is dead.

    3. Re:Get a feature phone, dumbass. by hey! · · Score: 1

      You know what's going to happen if you rely on a pager, don't you? Nobody will know how to contact you on that.

      Which, indeed, is a feature -- not a bug. Anyone you want to reach you you give them the secret formula: call my pager's phone #, and when you hear the beep enter your phone number followed by #. Or if you need to send text, send an email to myPagerPhoneNumber@provider.com. If you can't handle that I don't want to hear from you.

      Oh, and a feature phone is fine solution if it's OK that you can't be reached when you're in a tunnel or some other places the VHF phone band can't reach but typical pager frequencies can.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  11. Phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you cannot remember to charge a phone every other day, how in the hell are you going to run a business?

  12. SMS is not a reliable alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I am part of a couple of groups that use SMS (sent from an email list server) for notifications.
    Sometimes it works great, sometimes they are delayed 30min, 1hr, ...
    Its amazing the phone companies can charge so much and offer so little.

    1. Re:SMS is not a reliable alternative by eth1 · · Score: 2

      I am part of a couple of groups that use SMS (sent from an email list server) for notifications.
      Sometimes it works great, sometimes they are delayed 30min, 1hr, ...
      Its amazing the phone companies can charge so much and offer so little.

      Another issue with SMS "paging" is that phones are often not set up for that. By default, they're usually set up to be more discreet. They will often play a notification ONCE when the SMS comes in, and if you miss it, don't wake up, etc., you're screwed, especially if you're the only point of contact. A real pager will usually be much more persistent, which is important for heavy sleepers like me.

    2. Re:SMS is not a reliable alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are apps that will make more noise if a message has certain strings (or even reg-exps) in it.

    3. Re:SMS is not a reliable alternative by tarpitcod · · Score: 1

      In a prior life I spent many hours working with SMS. Both text and binary mode, and interestingly a browser that ran in the SIM chip that used binary-mode SMS as a transport. It was a fascinating thing to use, transferring small pages back and forth all via SMS. It wasn't actually that horrible, and had some nice features - the big one being you could keep everything on the SIM which had advantages.

      Most people don't realize that the SMS standard includes binary mode, and you can also request delivery receipt, where you get notified that your message was delivered. The browser I mentioned above didn't use delivery receipt, and sometimes for BIG pages (say 600 bytes of tokenized stuff) it would need four messages, and it still worked decently fast. I'm guessing five to ten seconds for a response. Sounds terrible, but you got used to vi dsecond or so delays. I suspect consistency is what counts.

      I used to talk to folks who developed the 'message servers' and network control stuff for GSM networks. I remember hearing about one vendor on-site at a U.S. carrier with a mis-configured server. SMS was queuing up. Apparently the solution the operator devised was to just delete a massive queue of SMS messages when they queued up. Didn't inspire much hope.

      Still, beats the whole Telecom NZ fiasco where they literally had people typing messages they read from GSM customers into a new message. When word of this got out people would purposely text their Telecom mobile friends the most insane text messages they could think of.

    4. Re:SMS is not a reliable alternative by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I can't think of any part of your missive that is not, in some way, fascinating. No, that's not sarcasm - all the way to the end, the reading of texts for re-entry, all fascinating and good stuff. Seriously, that's not sarcasm.

      Having said that, what's this browser thing you speak of? I mean, I understand it conceptually and it actually sounds kind of brilliant but my Google-fu is weak and I'm not finding anything that looks quite like what you described. I don't have a better way to say it except to say that it's fascinating and tickles my geek-bone. That means I'd like to know where (if possible) I can get into the nitty-gritty aspects of it and I'm curious as to how accessible it might be.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    5. Re:SMS is not a reliable alternative by evilviper · · Score: 1

      They will often play a notification ONCE when the SMS comes in, and if you miss it, don't wake up, etc., you're screwed, especially if you're the only point of contact. A real pager will usually be much more persistent,

      Yes, and there's only several hundred apps for Android which will make your phone more persistent about getting your attention, than any pager...

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    6. Re:SMS is not a reliable alternative by tarpitcod · · Score: 1

      Thanks! The browser everyone called the WIB - I think that stood for Wireless Internet Browser (It's been a while). It always talked to a WIG (Wireless internet gateway). If you google for WIB 1.3 you will find stuff. There's also the USIM Application Toolkit. To read about that 3GPP TS 31.111. For details on SMS you could try3GPP TS 23.040. It's been over a decade - but I think those will get you started. One thing to watch for is this stuff is not WAP. That was totally different, a walled garden approach. The WIB would talk to whatever website you pointed it to.

    7. Re:SMS is not a reliable alternative by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Oh no, thank you! ;-) We don't get enough of this sort of stuff in the comments any more. When I read your post, my "holy crap" button was pressed. There's actually a lot of potential there - if I'm reading and understanding properly. As you can shunt binaries over it (and presumably split them and recombine them) it's possibly a method to push all sorts of things and, if I'm reading properly, it supports bi-directional communication.

      It could be an SMS application but not one that's for reading SMS necessarily but one that uses it as a protocol. The first one that comes to mind is that SMS is often included, unlimited, and/or inexpensive. Picture messaging is not always included in the bundle. Using the protocol, even large pictures could be sent in chunks and reassembled. Then, there's all sorts of ways to tuck data into it - not using your data plan but simply sending the data in binaries and have it interpreted, decompressed, or reassembled at the client end.

      As SMS is *usually* fairly reliable it might work well. It won't be speedy, necessarily, but it should be fairly dependable. Why has nobody done much with this? I can think of a dozen ways to make use of this and I'm not even in the industry. Heck, I haven't even given it much thought. Unless I'm missing something, this could actually be valuable to a whole bunch of people. I'm pretty sure it'd piss off the cell companies and they could probably filter for it. Still...

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    8. Re:SMS is not a reliable alternative by tarpitcod · · Score: 1

      OK - again, it's been a while but here's the why you don't hear so much about this IMHO.

      Operators tie down the SIM a fair degree - the last thing they want is somebody being able to remotely brick a customers SIM or spam the network with SMS. An alternate view is: Why not let the customer do what they want with their SIM? It's their SIM, so why not let them do what they want with it? If they brick it, that's their problem!

      Then you have the handset manufacturers. They don't want to be glorified terminals to the SIM either. They want to lock users into their handset ecosystem. That's gotten even more prevalent now with iPhones etc. Back when I was working with it, you could pop a SIM with the WIB in a handset and use the browser. On a handset with a larger screen - you got more stuff displayed. It was cool.

      You have all these factors competing. You can *totally* technically issue customers with SIM that have a full operating system with loadable apps running on the SIM chip. It's entirely doable. You can put apps on smart-cards - there's standards for loading apps, activating them and doing stuff. I haven't kept up with where it's all at nowadays.

      You can actually buy smart-card SDK's (or at least used to be able to). If you want to try that, there's stuff like Java Card. One way to think of the SIM is it's just a smart card with a bunch of telecom apps / services.

      There's loads of SIM chips out there, and with all the problems with credit card hacking we are seeing wider adoption of smart-cards too, so if you are interested it's definitely an area which will need people who know how these things work.

    9. Re:SMS is not a reliable alternative by KGIII · · Score: 1

      That is absolutely fascinating. And, again, I'm not kidding. I've since bookmarked and read a bunch. I have some ideas and they'll never reach fruition or anything but they are fun to mull over. It looks like it's not actually all that difficult to set up a small pseudo cell network in a "lab." That actually does make me think of a potential product or two - and a whole bunch of ways to utilize these features.

      I can see why the carriers might not like that sort of stuff. I also (think) I understand the trend by the handset vendors. They're working really hard to keep people locked in. From a business viewpoint, that is probably their wisest choice. The added complexities, risks, and overhead are surely going to make things much more expensive. Then there's the control aspect and everyone wants to control other people. :/

      I sometimes go off on wild tangents in real life. I'll find something that I find interesting and just immerse myself in it - I'll spend weeks, months, and even years learning about something. It will have no real-world application, never be a product or service, but it gives me something to do and I enjoy learning new things. I'm aging and learning new things helps keep my brain from turning into mush. That's actually why I'm getting back into programming. I don't want to have my brain turn into mush. I'm retired and particularly lazy. I have to overcome that laziness and do things to keep learning or, seriously, my brain will turn into mush.

      As an aside: I'm not kidding about the mush. I can actually *feel* it happening, sort of. I can tell that my memory is worse. I can tell that it's more difficult for me to remember new things. I can tell that my learning has slowed. I can tell that my method of learning has also changed. So, I've been doing things to not let that happen (and a checkup assures me that there's nothing abnormal going on in there) and it's quite enjoyable to feel it returning to the state that it was at. Just making a point to spend a little while, preferably every day, doing something new and mentally challenging has made a big difference. Immersing myself into a whole new project, something I'm unfamiliar with, will probably help that out.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  13. why not charge your phone? by known_coward_69 · · Score: 1

    like plug it in your car when you drive? or keep it plugged in all day at work? or do you have some OCD issues like my wife against charging devices as you work and waiting for them to die?

    1. Re:why not charge your phone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      He's a Bernie supporter. He's holding out for free energy.

    2. Re: why not charge your phone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't believe I had to scroll past a hundred comments to finally find a joke about Sanders.

    3. Re: why not charge your phone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be a Republican. They think we should just give all our money to corporations which will occasionally decide to give us something in return and call it a 'free market'.

    4. Re:why not charge your phone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Communists are only permitted to have access equal to that of the ruling proletariat

  14. Networks no longer exist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most of the systems used older analog towers and even the 'digital' ones don't have much of a network anymore. Buy a better phone, that would be a cheaper solution overall.

    1. Re:Networks no longer exist by sims+2 · · Score: 1

      Yeah afaik there is no company that even provides pager service in my area. I don't remember ever seeing someone with a pager around here in years past either.

      So I think we just jumped from smoke signals to cellphones and skipped over pagers. Although I do believe some areas around here are still using smoke signals.

      --
      Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
  15. Unfortunately. Yes. by CAHutch · · Score: 0

    My company still passes around a pager even though we all have cell phones. The reasoning is that the pager will reach areas that don't have good cellular coverage. I don't like carrying the extra item around, but I do find that without it I would miss most text messages or emails on my phone since the pager is much louder.

  16. Why not buy an uncrippled phone by yacc143 · · Score: 1

    Uncrippled would be something with a swappable battery.

  17. Why not SMS instead? by dejanc · · Score: 4, Informative

    You can get cheap dumb phones with long battery life, or you can even get one with AA batteries (like SpareOne). That will give you both voice and text functionality and spare you the embarrassment of asking someone to page you (at least I would feel awkward mentioning pagers to my clients).

    Also, you could setup a simple email to SMS gateway, so you can get a text message whenever somebody emails emergency@yourbusiness.com.

    In a nutshell, your phone battery will drain quickly only if you keep using it as a smart phone, i.e. using data, wifi, bluetooth, having your screen on all the time, etc. If you keep a dedicated mobile phone for emergencies only and use it primarily for texting, you will have all the benefits of a pager while remaining in the 21st century.

    You can push a dumb phone battery to a full week if you do it right, and to me at least, charging a phone over weekend or in the car is easier and cheaper then swapping batteries.

    1. Re:Why not SMS instead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      SMS can take hours to deliver messages in a downtown area. I work for a data center, and I typically receive an email and can fix the problem before I even get the SMS alert. Nothing beats a pager when it comes to reliability and speed of delivery.

    2. Re:Why not SMS instead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My work smart phone that I only use for business calls and business email gets battery life of over 3 days.

      Personal smartphone gets less than a day.

    3. Re:Why not SMS instead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My smartphone has a mode where you can turn it basically into a dumb phone. It lasts about a week in that mode. In full out smart phone mode it lasts about a day.

    4. Re:Why not SMS instead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SMS can take hours to deliver messages in a downtown area. I work for a data center, and I typically receive an email and can fix the problem before I even get the SMS alert. Nothing beats a pager when it comes to reliability and speed of delivery.

      If the salesman thinks the sales call is so important to make a sale, then he should stay in the sales area and in a place where the sales information can get to him for sales.

      The guy has problems with discipline, and has an over inflated sense of how important stuff is. I go all over the goddamn place and have had one or two times when I noticed SMS problems, and one was when the FBI, state, and local popo were all over the area with their electronics trying to chase down some homie the clown goon. "SMS problems" just aren't that common.

      This is a manufactured problem from a person that wants to have his self importance boosted by having an oddball device.

      Plug in the phone. Problem solved!

    5. Re:Why not SMS instead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >spare you the embarrassment of asking someone to page you (at least I would feel awkward mentioning pagers to my clients).

      That's a really good point. Unless you're a drug dealer, telling your clients to page you would be worse than having an AOL email address for your business.

    6. Re:Why not SMS instead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I disagree with this emphatically. The company I work for has 3 auto-reply stations that we can ping to detect SMS latency. About 5% of messages are delayed for 10 minutes or more and about 1% are delayed for 30 minutes or more. These problems are most prevalent when going between carriers. I suspect that the people you SMS with tend to be on the same carrier you are on.

    7. Re:Why not SMS instead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It varies heavily between different cities, and between the many cities I've worked in or lived in, I've seen some places with frequent SMS problems. The worst had about 25% of messages delayed by more than an hour, and about 5% of messages not delivered at all. It was a decent sized city of about 500k, so not the middle of nowhere.

    8. Re: Why not SMS instead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never give a modern American actual data that contradicts their belief in their own smug superiority. They just can't handle it.

    9. Re:Why not SMS instead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AMEN! I maintain a UHF TV broadcast transmitter on the air 24/7/365, and my station uses a pager to reach me for many reasons. 1) They know the pager works in many places where cell phones do not. 2) One AA battery per month is not a budget buster. 3) Because this is how my employer reaches me when there is a problem at the transmitter, my having two contact phone numbers is not a problem. They know the pager works 99.9% of the time, and they value the reliability of communication with me over convenience to their fingers.

      We have tried SMS, but SMS has proven not be as reliable as pages because the SMS/cellular phone signals do not penetrate into buildings as well as the paging signals does. Pagers run with higher power transmitters, on lower frequencies, and lower data rates, all of which make for a more dependable messaging system.

    10. Re:Why not SMS instead? by antdude · · Score: 1

      Don't SMS get lost? I noticed they can be missed since they get lost. :(

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    11. Re:Why not SMS instead? by dave420 · · Score: 1

      SMS messages delivery is "best effort", meaning they might never be delivered or received by the intended recipient. Some extra work on top of that would be needed to get something more reliable. Clearly if you are running the SMS gateway you have some control, but not total, as things can still happen between the gateway and the handset which would end up in a message not being received. SMS is not for important things.

  18. Pagers are great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Once you become used to how much more reliable and faster they are than text messages, you'll never want to go back. In most downtown areas there are big spaces where buildings block the signal so they're just not dependable. Also, high SMS traffic in urban areas means it can take hours for messages to get through. Yesterday, messages were lagging over four hours with AT&T in downtown Seattle.

  19. The problem I've had is with pager coverage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since most wireless has gone to cell phone, pager coverage has become problematic. I used to have my home phone posted on the white board in the OCC, with a "if I don't respond to a page, call me", which is something I don't recommend (giving out your home phone). Therefore, my business bought me a cell phone to cover in place of the pager, and it's had the added advantage of being able to call back, along with use as a laptop wireless connection.

  20. Network gone by ickleberry · · Score: 1

    I used to have one but the network has been dismantled as far as I know. In Ireland pagers never had decent 2-way functionality and they were never popular to begin with.

  21. Gives you time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm on call from time to time (one week a month, for a full 7 days) and I *LOVE* the fact that a Pager at 3AM at least gives me a bit of time to wake-up and go to the toilet compared to being called directly and dump on a phone bridge with 10 other people wanting an answer *RIGHT NOW*.

    I also have shitty Cell reception where I live, but Pager reception is A-1

    1. Re:Gives you time... by The+Good+Reverend · · Score: 1

      You're allowed to not answer your phone right away, too.

  22. Got a pager by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a pager. Nagios pages us when there are system issues. It also emails us, but if our internal network goes down chances are the POTS phone will keep working.

    Having said that, my boss and I are always looking for ways to ditch the pager... They're expensive, and annoying to get (and I already smashed one by accident).

  23. drop the pager by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    we dropped them at work and went to text, for one main reason. if you are out of the pagers area, or battery dies, or accidentally have it off, it will not queue up the page. A page is sent once, whether it makes it to the pager or not. whereas a phone will catch up as soon as it has a signal

  24. Emergency Services by ronaldbeal · · Score: 5, Informative

    Many emergency services such as fire departments, Offices of emergency management, etc still use RF pagers. The system is part of or tied in with the dispatch system. By removing third parties in the communication signal chain, the pager systems provide latency free, and high availability for dispatch systems. They also work well for emergency services because they are geographically limited by the pager transmission antenna coverage. which usually coincides with the emergency services coverage area. For the OP's situation there are usually two options: a local RF network, or satellite pager systems. The local networks may or may not have better coverage, just depends on your local pager provider. Sat pagers tend to have nationwide coverage, but reception is limited by access to the sky. Those choices may or may not be suitable for your needs. RB

    1. Re:Emergency Services by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was going to say this. As a volunteer firefighter in NH, our pagers give us low latency, good coverage communications from dispatch.

    2. Re:Emergency Services by KGIII · · Score: 1

      They still use the radios up in my home area in Maine. They all carry rather rugged radios on their belts. They play a tone (like specifics for area or for mutual aid or for whom/what is needed) and then they go out in voice. I believe a radio license is required to transmit (but not to listen) so most of them only work for reception but the chief and assistant chief have ones that can transmit. Home is actually counting the village, I'm in an unincorporated township - not far from Rangeley.

      I've got some friends down in Vienna, Mt. Vernon, Rome areas and they're volunteers as well - they too carry the radios. I believe they only support a few channels and cycle between them, like a scanner, and that the different departments all have a "call out" tone. At a certain time of the night they go off on a "tone test" and all the departments send out a tone, one right after the other, and areas with good reception get to listen for quite a while. A pager might be a better idea though these things can be particularly loud and attention getting.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    3. Re:Emergency Services by slimjim8094 · · Score: 1

      I'm a volunteer EMT in New Jersey and also a ham radio operator, and as far as I know, most places including our own use local radio systems like the one you describe. The license covers everybody in the agency (just like a taxi dispatcher's will). We use a two-tone system; the radio is squelched until the two tones come through and then the radio alerts (if it's set to alert) and unsquelches for the voice transmission. The earliest iteration of this was called a Plectron and the term is still used informally to refer to our Minitor portable pagers. All the neighboring agencies use variations on this system, but I believe the largest agencies (like NYFD) have some computerized dispatch. We don't directly get dispatched by neighboring towns for mutual aid - that comes through our own dispatch so they know to keep track of us - but if we are on a call to a neighboring town we are allowed to transmit on their frequency and have some radios that can do so.

      We use VHF low band (~45MHz) for dispatch and used to use it for voice comms, but the antennas are just too long for portable use to be effective. Most nearby police are on UHF, and the regional emergency frequencies are on VHF. We have Motorola radios for each frequency band, each with anywhere from 4-20 channels programmed into them.

      The decision for who gets radios that can transmit is mostly driven by cost and numbers. In our squad, all the crew chiefs have transmit-capable radios, and everyone else has a Minitor (2-5). The radios are 2-3x the cost of the pagers. We have about 16 radios that can be signed out for use by non-crew chiefs.

      Every agency uses something a little different, and in most cases (especially smaller agencies) it's roughly the same system they came up with about 40 years ago. So there's a lot of historical legacy involved. The newfangled thing is trunking radio systems - those are nice because they provide talkgroups and make interoperability and provisioning straightforward - but you kind of need to move all at once since "normal" equipment won't work with them.

      --
      I have developed a truly marvelous proof of this comment, which this signature is too narrow to contain.
    4. Re:Emergency Services by KGIII · · Score: 1

      So... Anyone can transmit on these systems and it is just cost that holds them back? Would transmit ability be good for the other firefighters who are not the chief or assistant chief? 'Cause, if so, I'll just buy my local volunteer department the equipment. I thought it was license restrictions - they had to be a ham to transmit on those frequencies? If it's just a matter of money, it's covered and I'll get them new radios. I might even have it done before I get back in the spring.

      Why? Err... They're the *volunteer* fire department. In a tiny village in Maine. They've got three firetrucks and a rescue truck and some smaller trucks and ATVs. When people get lost, go through the ice, or get hurt - they're there. They drop what they're doing and they go running. Every year, if you donate or not, they'll clean your chimney.

      As for trunking, the State and police use that. My scanner manages to figure that out. I just sync it to the download from Radio Reference and I've got all that - or I can scan and find more. But, if this is just a matter of cost, I'll just buy them all units that can transmit. Maybe they'll be able to say who's able to respond to a "tone out." Maybe it will help. However, I kind of want these folks to have the tools they need and it's not entirely altruistic when I say so.

      I've gone in and asked what they could use to make their jobs easier and safer and they came back with a list. I just asked them how much it was to get that stuff and they gave me a number. I just gave them the funds. It was a bit costly but worth it. They can now swap O2 bottles, have better helmets, better jackets and boots, and a few other things that I'm going to skip. Radios were not on the list. And yes, yes that stuff was *really* much more expensive than I'd thought. I knew it would be costly but not that much.

      When they placed their order, I asked them to get me an axe. Obviously, I paid for it myself. That was one with the fiberglass handle (I think it's fiberglass) and was an absurd price. What they did do, which is kind of cool, is they took the axe down into Farmington and had it etched with their logo and a message of thanks. It was a nice touch and when I pointed out that I'd not be able to use the axe they had already anticipated it and had a second one hidden away which they gave to me. So, I have one that I can really use and one that hangs on my wall. Either way, the axe was over $200 as I recall.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    5. Re:Emergency Services by slimjim8094 · · Score: 1

      That's very generous of you, and it sounds like they really appreciated your effort. I know at my squad we'd be talking about that kind of thing for years. We are also a small volunteer agency serving about 7000 people (with mutual aid to nearby towns) and it makes my day whenever I can tell people "we don't charge" - usually they're expecting a big bill just for walking in the door. Our first experience with volunteer EMS was actually in Maine with the Popham VFD (south of Bath, near Portland). They pulled my 6 year old brother out of the ocean there. He's fine (kids usually are), and my parents really appreciated their efforts and professionalism.

      So I'm not a lawyer and I'm not going to find a FCC citation. I'm a ham and I know the FCC licenses individuals and stations, which is what my ham license covers, but I think in the case of a commercial or public-safety license the agency holds the license and allows its members to use it for transmission. The reason this is legal is that - unlike a ham license - a certified radio technician has to be the one to program the radios, and they're not tunable to a specific frequency without reprogramming (or in the old days, swapping crystals). It's possible we've been breaking the law, but I don't think so.

      As for whether to buy a bunch of radios... so the agency will know best whether radios are the best thing to do with the money. Buying radios is a tremendous expenditure - not hundreds of dollars, but tens of thousands of dollars, unfortunately. Radio expenditures are a substantial fraction of our yearly total- up to 20% in some years (but the radios are good for many years). We've been trying to move to UHF, since with the police repeater the range is much improved over VHF low-band, and it's exclusively for cost reasons that we've not done it completely yet. The police donated a rack of old radios to get us started, since at the time we couldn't even afford to have just 4 to sign out for the duty crew. The reason they're so expensive is because they are public safety equipment and you can literally kick it around, drop it in a lake, hit it with a hammer without damaging it. I think our current radio is the PR860 - new they were something like $1200 each? They've been discontinued and it looks like a reputable used source goes for $400-$600/ea and you'll probably want a new battery for those.

      If the agency has radios for the people who can use them, the money is better spent on something else. For our squad it would be nice for every member to have their own radio, so people could report that they're responding to the call or to pick up the ambulance. Today only the crew chief can do that - with the pagers you can receive, just not transmit - but we've decided that's enough since we can actually handle the call with only one other person as long as the crew chief shows up, and we ride with three. So if somebody wanted to give us $10k for something we'd probably earmark it for a training fund - training is very expensive. We have a generous donor who covers most of our training, and it's a real weight off our minds. And for a fire department, I think the training is substantially more expensive than EMS.

      --
      I have developed a truly marvelous proof of this comment, which this signature is too narrow to contain.
    6. Re:Emergency Services by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Oh, they're fairly well outfitted. ;-) I sold my business and retired - I know live just up above Rangeley, Maine - about 24 miles out of the village. I attended a boarding school in Maine and used to come up this way to hunt every fall. Rangeley was able to afford a good sized down payment on a brand new firetruck and a refurbished pumper from a municipality down below. They are well taken care of but not in the habit of saying what they need.

      They'll *probably* get their radios. There's almost certainly bound to be a quiet call to the chief on Thursday night (after their meeting) and an anonymous donor will donate the radios. Strangely enough, things like that have a way of happening in Rangeley. I can't speak for that anonymous person but I can say that I got damned lucky in life and sold my business for a decent sum of money about 8 years ago. I've been in Rangeley for the last six. The anonymous person also likes to help out the local elementary school and library a lot. If there's some reason that stops them from getting the radios then it will, almost certainly, not be because the anonymous donor is worried about the costs.

      Popham, eh? Watch out for the undertow. Maine's beaches are beautiful but they can be dangerous. My guess is that he was on the north side and not over on the beach side - at the State Park? If you time it right, you can walk out to a raised island type of deal (over on that side) that disappears when the tide comes back in. We end up with a few people getting into trouble there and some of the time they're not able to be saved. I guess he also could have been out near the tip, furthest out into the ocean, but the current is strong there and getting a small kid back from that might be a problem - depends on the weather. It's super impressive when we get a hurricane or even just the remnants of one. It's things like that, the stark contrast, that make me love the area so much and is why I retired there. The southern side, the part where it's got the sandy beach, has less current and is usually where you'd want to go into the water. They might even have signs suggesting that you not go into the water in the other areas - but I've not been there in a couple of years.

      At any rate - much thanks for the information. These are inland Mainers and they don't do hat-in-hand thing unless they are well and truly destitute. So, it's unlikely that they'd tell me about how much the radios had the potential to help. That's a bit unfortunate but it's understandable. "We wouldn't want to put nobody out of pocket." (Double negative intentional and colloquially correct.) So, a phone call will be made, an order number given in a week or two, and they'll have 'em within six or so more weeks I imagine. Some anonymous person will take care of that.

      If you get up that way again, well... You can let me know, of course, or you can make your way to Pemaquid, Pemaquid Point. There's a co-op where you can get whatever came in on the boats at dirt cheap prices. (Native secret, still not boat prices but not bad - it's a real co-op.) If you're really in the mood for luxury then when you're at the co-op, look behind it for a trail. Follow the trail. At the end of the trail is a restaurant. They're one of the few truly rated 5 star restaurants up this way. You don't always get what you want because they get a lot of what they serve from that co-op. Meaning, it came off the boat and they sent a prep-cook down over that trail to pick up your fish. You can actually, if you want, ask for Mike (he's ALWAYS there for lunch) and get permission and then just go down and pick up your own fish and tell them how you want it prepared.

      The funny thing is, the prices are *very* reasonable. Not many tourists even know it or know about it. There's a museum at the old lighthouse and a "down east" art museum just above it - in the same parking area as the lighthouse - down at the Point itself.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  25. Spy agencies use typewritters by gurps_npc · · Score: 1

    I also still use paperback books. They have size and map advantages over ebooks (The guy that invents software to let you zoom to your heart's content on a map included in an ebook will make a $1,000,000)

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    1. Re:Spy agencies use typewritters by queazocotal · · Score: 1

      How does one zoom to ones heart content on paper maps on books?
      They are generally shitty quality.

    2. Re:Spy agencies use typewritters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhh? You can't get anything sharper than pixel resolution unless the ebook has vector graphics, which I have NEVER seen for a map like you describe. If you aren't referring to resolution, then I can only say, "imagine it bigger" ?

    3. Re:Spy agencies use typewritters by gurps_npc · · Score: 1

      With a magnifier glass. But the real point is that with a map in paper books, hey are ALWAYS already sized sot that normal people can see the map. Maps in ebooks are generally set up to require x20 magnification to read - and they refuse to offer any magnification

      --
      excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    4. Re:Spy agencies use typewritters by queazocotal · · Score: 1

      No, they aren't. Many books have skimpy maps that are barely visible.

  26. Portable chargers.. by modi123 · · Score: 1

    Invest in a portable charger and pay once versus a monthly fee for a pager.

    Bada bing, bada boom.

  27. They can still be useful by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

    Pagers tend to have better reception than cell phones, at least fairly recently when I last looked this up for my own curiosity. Also, many paging companies have "TAP" servers that you can dial into with a modem to send pages. This is could make a nice last-resort fallback for when a data center has lost network access and you can still provide outbound alerting via a backup landline.

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  28. prepare for low battery situations by IT.luddite · · Score: 1

    Since you didn't complain about poor signal strength, I'll focus solely on the issue of running out of power. When I had a phone with replaceable batteries, I carried two extra batteries that were always fully charged. Even with opportunistic charging habits, I would regularly swap out to a fresh battery in the early/mid afternoon. For the few times a month I went through both extra batteries, I had a 20k mAhr external battery pack I would fall back on. With this setup, I never ran out of power. I have the RAVPower battery pack and have been immensely satisfied with my purchase. I've also have heard very good things on the Anker line. I used this setup for over two years successfully. For the past 3 months, I'm using a current gen smartphone without an interchangeable battery (or SD slot! life sucks). I've been relying on a mophie battery case and the battery pack to get me through the day. Honestly, I haven't had to use the battery pack as the energy drain during the day is significantly less and the mophie has been sufficient to keep me charged up.

  29. Expensive but worth it. by chiefloko · · Score: 1

    I still carry a pager! I still have to carry a pager, partly because of having multiple institutional/corporate partners that like to have a leash on their "V.P." - it always makes people laugh when they see it come out in board meetings. The reason for carrying it is really two-fold 1) it will wake the dead when it goes off and 2) living in NYC and taking public transportation does not merit 100% cell phone coverage. The pager frequencies are so low that they have been able to reach me in the bowels of the MTA.
    They are pricey, a good rechargeable Apollo model goes for $200-300 and nationwide service is nearly double that!
    It really depends on why it is needed? For me it is the necessity and immediacy, I have a few hundred servers spread across 50+ data centers and 6 continents; when something is an emergency I need to know.

  30. Diifferent network by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another advantage of a pager is that they run on a different network, and in case of an emergency when all the cellular networks are down or blocked, your pager will probably still be working.

    This could especially be important if you provide some kind of urgent service

  31. pagers are the most reliable and secure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I work for a defense contractor, and 1-way pagers are common place. Not only are they far more reliable, but you can't take any device that transmits into a secure area.

  32. Flip phone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe consider getting a flip phone.

    I still use one as my business line and only have to charge it once a week with moderate use.

    They're rather cheap.

  33. Heck yeah, I write in shorthand daily by TheModelEskimo · · Score: 1

    I don't know the solution to OP's problem, although I had a flip phone for a while a couple years ago and it had amazing battery life...I think I charged it twice a week max, overnight.

    Also, if I was volunteering for a political campaign I'd be using a different phone and number entirely. In my volunteer work I use the $13/mo. plan from Page Plus for this purpose and it's just fine.

    As far as dead tech goes, I write in shorthand, definitely dead tech at this point. I do it because I enjoy writing by hand and shorthand saves me lots of time. I write at least 2-3x faster and I can still read what I wrote afterward. Plus nobody can look over and read my personal notes when I'm at a conference, that sort of thing.

  34. Pager pranks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nothing like getting a page with a phone number to...

  35. I wouldn't do business with a pager based company by justcauseisjustthat · · Score: 1

    I seriously would not do business with any company who had as a point of contact, a pager number. In the age of smart phones (with battery packs and alternative charging methods) why go backwards, in a worst case have an older cellphone that lasts days.

  36. Pagers shared in work group for emergency contact by Dzimas · · Score: 5, Insightful

    One of my friends carries a pager when he's on call for work (a municipality, and he'd most likely be contacted about a toxic spill). He just clips it to his belt and forgets about it.

    The pager has several advantages over a phone. The most critical is that it's a shared device that gets passed between the on-call staff. That means there's no risk of someone forgetting their phone at home, running out of battery or having an incorrect number listed on the staff contact form. Emergency Services has a single contact number that should always work.

  37. My dead tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A simple 27MHz Citizen's Band hand-held transceiver. There are still truckers using that band, and when you leave the big city there are hicks airing their dirty laundry and gossiping. It's hilarious. Sometimes I break in and shout "you're all faggots!" and listen for the fun!
    PS: I'm in Québec, so I really yell "vous etes tous des osties de tappettes!".

    1. Re:My dead tech by avandesande · · Score: 1

      I have large drums and a hot smoky fire going just in case.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    2. Re:My dead tech by k6mfw · · Score: 1

      Sometimes I break in and shout "you're all faggots!" and listen for the fun!

      do they ask "what are YOU doing here anyways?"

      --
      mfwright@batnet.com
    3. Re:My dead tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do any of them ever say "Je suis clou rouillé" back?

  38. Sure, why not? by gstoddart · · Score: 1

    I know people who carry old fashioned pagers, and have done so for years. Yes, they also have smart phones, but cell service in many places is shit, and pagers have been part of the support infrastructure forever.

    And, believe it or not, people still use land lines too. I know it's shocking to the kiddies, but it's true.

    Do you people all think this technology became obsolete because you can get a freakin' app?

    Where I live your chance of cellular coverage is iffy, and I'm in the burbs, just in a spot with bad coverage.

    My wife's stupid fucking pager? Still keeps working.

    What you have to ask yourself, is do you want to get paged in the middle of the night, and just how much do you plan on charging for that privilege? Everyone I know who carries one is getting a premium just to have it, and an hourly rate in the event it goes off.

    Otherwise, carrying one is the stupidest idea you can imagine, and people just assume you work 24x7. If you do that, well, you're a sucker.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    1. Re:Sure, why not? by FaxeTheCat · · Score: 1

      Actually, in many countries, the pager infrastructure has been shut down. Where I live, the pager infrastructure was turned off around ten years ago. Nobody cared.

    2. Re:Sure, why not? by Etcetera · · Score: 1

      Actually, in many countries, the pager infrastructure has been shut down. Where I live, the pager infrastructure was turned off around ten years ago. Nobody cared.

      Are you sure you're not confusing that with analog cell service? That has indeed been shut down in most places, with very, very few exceptions globally (mostly in extremely rural areas where people haven't wanted to go to satellite service). Pager frequencies in a lot of places is still going very strong, for precisely the reasons indicated in the discussion.

      That's even moreso the case depending on government needs in your jurisdiction. If there are Important Civilian Responsibilities, then the pager network likely still works, since they're probably not using milcom but may need to function when the cell towers are out.

    3. Re:Sure, why not? by FaxeTheCat · · Score: 1

      I am not confusing it with analog cell service. That one was shut down here 15 years ago.

  39. Pager networks are still a thing? by saccade.com · · Score: 1

    I stopped using mine in the '90s when the service provider went under.

  40. Still use pagers and fax machines here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We still have pagers for all of our on-call staff. The cost/coverage used to be really good, even better than cellular, now however not so much, so I expect we'll be phasing them out in favor of simple email alerts to existing cell phones.

    We still also use fax machines, to communicate with our vendors and certain international customers who insist on having documents faxed to them. I never understood why, clearly an emailed PDF is superior to a fax machine, but meh, I don't make the decisions.

    1. Re:Still use pagers and fax machines here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We still also use fax machines, to communicate with our vendors and certain international customers who insist on having documents faxed to them. I never understood why, clearly an emailed PDF is superior to a fax machine, but meh, I don't make the decisions.

      It could be that your customers live in a country where the law considers a written document as proof?

  41. Quit blaming the phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It isn't randomly dying. The battery is going dead because you're too stupid to keep it charged. Stop failing it and it will stop failing you.

  42. Current users of pagers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From my observations of Flex and POCSAG protocols with homebrew receivers, it appears that Hospitals, Emergency services, Veternarians, and a few traditional phone# users are using these things. The signals are incredibly good and can be received almost anywhere... even from other states sometimes. They still have some applications.

    1. Re:Current users of pagers by iteyus · · Score: 1

      Exactly, for emergency service where every minute counts - and for very good reasons: They work on a simple battery for months. They work in the basement and in the mountains and with all the news and messages on your smartphone you never know what's really important. But if the pager goes of it's time to drop what you are doing and run.

    2. Re:Current users of pagers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please share what pager service you have that works in basements. Skytel certainly does not.

  43. Nice try, time-traveling DEA agent from 1985 by istartedi · · Score: 1

    Oh! DeLorean is paging me. brb.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  44. Text Message or Email by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let your client s know the only way to reach you is either text message (SMS) or email (SMTP/IMAP) direct to your smartphone. Turn off the telephone ringer. In business nothing rises to the level of "OMG! Life or death!"

  45. There's a better way by DrHyde · · Score: 1

    If your phone "likes to die", have you considered just getting a new phone that isn't broken, or carrying a spare battery if it's dieing because you're draining the battery?

  46. Diversify and get a phone that does not suck by silas_moeckel · · Score: 1

    Client calls come into a pbx, ring the cell and desk phone etc etc etc. Mind you my desk phone is an android tablet with poe and a real handset/speaker phone so things like contacts just work and bluetooth.

    Second get a phone thats does not suck, working with a nexus 5x and better battery life fast charging for that every 36 hours or so. I do miss my qi charging still.

    --
    No sir I dont like it.
  47. So what do you do when.. by niftymitch · · Score: 1

    So what do you do when the pager goes off.
    Do you run and find a pay phone?
    Do you reach into your pocket for your cell phone?

    What do you plan to do when the customer captures your cell phone number
    and just calls you back?

    A pager does have value because the coverage was nearly universal.
    They are reliable.
    A classic pager just displays numbers to call back or pre-shared code numbers.
    The day I got a text/message pager that could give me a message "All OK" in contrast
    to a call back number that was run to find a phone leash was like being released from
    chains. It still took years to retrain managers and customers to send status hints in
    contrast to a summons in the dark.

    Mostly get a modern phone with a lot of battery life.
    Car chargers are important to have.
    Get a spare battery strategy.

    Coverage... all cell coverage is not equal. Cell coverage has gaps that pager service does not.
    One AC was right... pagers do not transmit so might be allowed inside when smartphones are not.
    Camera... most repair folk now photograph the device serial number, make and model.
    Some places prohibit cameras...

    Political campaigns have gotten very automated and a smart phone will allow the party
    to help you do what they want. The political tools allow a canvasser to know the registration
    and names of folk behind the door at any address even geolocation with GPS. Vans driving
    voters to the ballot places are able to pass over individuals registered for the 'other' party.

    Make a list of the details and go shopping.

    --
    Truth is stranger than fiction, but it is because Fiction is obliged to stick to possibilities; Truth isn't. Mark Twain.
  48. PowerBank + WallWart + RollUp by DrYak · · Score: 2

    extra battery USB-charger things

    Yup, I would definitely agree with this.

    My setup up is:
    - 10'000mAh USB powerbank (good for ~4x full recharge of the smartphone)
    - small compact USB wallwart that can still deliver at least 1'000mA (2'100mA model in the same build size are starting to appear).
    - USB roll-up cable (take very little place and doesn't tangle)

    With that I'm good to go every-where for long period of time. I can recharge the smartphone on the go with the powerbank.
    Or plug it into the wall, or even into the electrical outlets available in most european trains to recharge the battery.

    That has really helped me once I've switched from old dumbphone (holds charge 1 week at least) to modern smartphone (is very heavy on cloud usage, charge holds 1 day under heavy 3G usage)

    Equipment is still compact and doesn't eat up too much place in pockets/bag/backpack.

    Note that lithium batteries are a delicate technology.
    It's better to either go to a well known brand, or at least buy from a well known shop so it's easy to have warranty in case of defect.
    They might all be produced in china, but at least you can reach someone who is liable for the build quality.
    Avoid buying lithium batteries from shady seller on ebay (or taobao, etc.) who promise you 30'000mAh for 20$ (might explode !)

    NOTE:
    Of course, it helps to live on a continent where the standard power connector is compact and easily interoperable (and are all 100-240V range by default).
    Bad luck for you if you live in the UK and its humongous power connector.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
    1. Re:PowerBank + WallWart + RollUp by hankwang · · Score: 1

      I've never seen a roll-up cable that can actually handle 1 A current. The wires are too thin; the phone will detect a voltage drop when it draws current and limit the current. It's more like 300-500 mA.

      Samsung makes compact phone chargers for their low-end smartphones that do 700 mA and include a flexible wire with micro-USB on one end. Much less bulky than a separate USB cable.

      As for UK plugs: stick the back of a teaspoon or similar object into the third, ground, hole, to open up the other two. Then, a euro plug will fit just fine. It probably violates electrical codes to do so, but whatever. The charger won't care whether the outlet is fused at 16 A (rest of Europe) or 32 A (UK).

    2. Re: PowerBank + WallWart + RollUp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.themu.co.uk

    3. Re:PowerBank + WallWart + RollUp by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      At least ours doesn't fall out the bloody wall with anything heavier than lamp flex or a tug stronger than a week old baby. If your cat can unplug stuff, your plug sucks.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    4. Re:PowerBank + WallWart + RollUp by dave420 · · Score: 1

      The British plug is simply awesome. When it's plugged there is no accidental unplugging. The built-in fuse is also incredibly useful. Great stuff. Just don't tread on one and you'll be fine :-P

  49. Re:Pagers shared in work group for emergency conta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can have a single contact phone number that forwards to the persons on call cell phone based on the time of day, day of the week, or whenever you switch shifts.

  50. Re:I wouldn't do business with a pager based compa by sribe · · Score: 1

    I seriously would not do business with any company who had as a point of contact, a pager number. In the age of smart phones (with battery packs and alternative charging methods) why go backwards, in a worst case have an older cellphone that lasts days.

    Yeah, just because the pager is far more reliable, phooey on that old stuff...

  51. Disable the Facebook App by Vegan+Cyclist · · Score: 1

    Delete it, or if not an option (like on my HTC phone) disable it. It's only been 4 days into my experiment, but I've charged my phone once in that time (HTC Desire 601, nothing too fancy, but decent.) For the last six months I've had to charge twice a day....and I honestly barely use the thing (the phone, and almost never the FB app). A few days ago read an article (Guardian I think) where people found the Facebook app was hosing their battery. Disabled it, got well over 50hrs before my next charge, and since my last charge it's been nearly 24hrs again (and 73% battery left.)

    If you need to access Facebook, load m.facebook.com into the Chrome browser, and allow notifications. Works almost as good. (Better in some ways, you can reply to messages without having the FB Messenger app as well.) I think I read there's a skin or something that makes it even smoother. I'll see how it lasts after a couple weeks, but it's been a while since I've been able to get more than 24hrs without a charge....and now it's several days in a row, so pretty promising. Couldn't figure out what was causing my battery to drain. I shudder to think how much energy is wasted on all the phones with this app..what are they doing, mining for bitcoins in the app?!

  52. forgot I had a pager by k6mfw · · Score: 2

    I used to carry a pager not too long ago. But in recent years nobody bothered to "call me" on the pager. I think reason is many people don't know what or how it is used. i.e. call my pager number, after hearing a few beeps then key in phone number you want me to call and then I will call you. Is this procedure still taught? Only need a few sentences at most for instructions. But maybe pagers gone way of dial telephones, plop one in front of somebody under 40 and they will have no idea what they are looking at.

    It seemed AAAbatterY didn't last very one, since it rarely received calls many times I forget to wear it. When I find after some time, battery is not only dead but leaked. So I have clean out the battery holder, kept doing this several times eventually didn't put a battery into it. Meanwhile the gal came through the office doing property inventory asked if I still use the pager. I had to find it in my junque archive, I turned it in. Last week got the message item has been disposed.

    --
    mfwright@batnet.com
  53. Re:I wouldn't do business with a pager based compa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have your typist fax your pager number to my secretary who will send it to me via telegram.

  54. Still ticking by tengu1sd · · Score: 1

    I'm at a medical center where pagers are still in use. Why? Pagers work in the basements and don't drop signal when you're inside a large building away from a window. We can request an upgraded 2-way pager, but most at best a pager will alert you and you can either pick up a phone or move to location where your phone has a signal. Under trial are VOIP phones that use our local Wi-Fi for staff on the floor to have texting & voice. During a prolong blackout, paging continued to work long after cell coverage had died.

    1. Re:Still ticking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A prelonged blackout at a medical center? Do you live in a 3rd world nation?

  55. User problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "One thing I have noticed is that my phone likes to die at the most inconvenient times and leaves me out of touch with people."

    This is caused by buying the wrong phone that has crap life, or the user not understanding you have to put the phone on the charger every night.

    I am a HEAVY phone user and even my One Plus X, one of the worst battery life phones out there still has 10% at the end of the day. I really dont feel bat at all when someone's phone is dying because it's because they were lazy and did not charge it the night before, or did not bother to charge it when in the car, yes even 5 minutes on a full rate charger makes a huge difference.

    So unless you wander around in the wilderness all day long, there is never an excuse to not plug in the phone.

    The other problem is silly people still using that 4 year old phone that has no battery life left... Wah, stop being cheap and buy a new phone.

  56. Not an option around here... by FaxeTheCat · · Score: 1

    Where I live, the pager systemwas shut down ten years ago. Nobody used them, nobody miss them. A cheap non.smart phone lasts for a week on moderate use.

  57. pager bound and happy about it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, I carry a pager and wouldn't consider getting rid of it. For what it is designed to do, a cell phone doesn't hold a candle to it. I suppose if you never leave the surface of a big city, a cell phone might be suitable but my pager however, works everywhere. In the city, underground in the parking garages, in the data center, in the middle of the country away from the city. Cell phones are great, I love my iPhone, but I know with absolute certainty, that if someone needs to get a hold of me, they will be able to beep me on my pager no matter where I am. Not so on a cell.

  58. 3rd time: Wireless ethernet doesn't exist by raymorris · · Score: 1

    I'm maybe 25% of the way down the page and already I've seen three posts from you about "wireless ethernet". Since you feel the need to keep posting that in reply to every message , I'll let you know: wireless Ethernet does not exist. No such thing. Unless it's installed in a Ford Chevy, by a man woman, during winter summer.

    Perhaps the reason the people who make the standards have an opinion different from yours is because they have some clue what they're talking about.

    1. Re:3rd time: Wireless ethernet doesn't exist by tarpitcod · · Score: 1

      You missed your chance to ask the parent how their ALOHAnet implementation was working out? Maybe by tweaking the carrier-sense and timing they could achieve better performance in that environment.

      Actually, I wonder if they considered going for a slower bit-rate, at a lower frequency. VLF may well work. Failing that, there's always ELF and CW if the message simply must get through.

    2. Re:3rd time: Wireless ethernet doesn't exist by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Heh, I wondered if anyone was going to say anything after the second time I saw it. What is this wireless ethernet and does it support carrier pigeons?

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  59. Pager is more reliable by axp_bofh · · Score: 2

    I've carried a pager for over 25 years (systems programmer, then systems admin(VMS, Linux, SAN...)). I like the pager for several reasons: 1) after so many years it is guaranteed to wake me up (and more importantly, it doesn't wake up my wife). 2) it will respond in places that my phone won't reliably get a signal. 3) battery life. 4) clips to my belt and forget it's there.5) if I go on vacation, I can leave it behind. Most paging systems will pass email notifications to the pager; at this point most of my pages are one system or another crying for daddy to help.

  60. Never had one. by Sique · · Score: 1

    Pagers were never that great here around, only hospitals used it, and about two years ago, I was within a project to lay to rest the last pager system at a hospital I know of. The other hospitals use DECT phones since ages and have the whole campus covered with DECT repeaters. Pagers are clumsy as you have to find the next phone and call from there. DECT phones can be called directly.

    --
    .sig: Sique *sigh*
  61. Re:I wouldn't do business with a pager based compa by Dynedain · · Score: 1

    And sails are far more reliable than diesel engines; clearly modern international shipping is just a fad following what's new and shiny.

    It's called weighing the benefits. The benefits of a modern smart phone far outweigh the limited benefit of a reliable pager for the vast majority of scenarios.

    --
    I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
  62. Re:Pagers shared in work group for emergency conta by Etcetera · · Score: 1

    You can have a single contact phone number that forwards to the persons on call cell phone based on the time of day, day of the week, or whenever you switch shifts.

    And that's why you don't work in emergency services. Reliability Engineering is a thing, and every additional link in the chain adds additional failure points.

    I like Google Voice, and Skype forwarding, and VOIP conference switches, and all that too... But a physical hand-off is much more reliable.

  63. Some carriers have awful coverage areas... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    American Messaging bought Skytel a few years ago.
    January 1, 2013 they shut down the old Skytel transmitters in the US.
    Pager worked great in my office, but no longer worked at home.

    As for SMS gateways... We added a european office in addition to the US and Indian offices to the on call rotation. The European pages would arrive hours after they were sent.
    Our solution, we sent the European office a US mobile configured for international roaming.

  64. Re:Solving the wrong problem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If your phone is dead, how are you going to respond to the page anyway?

    I have been seriously considering getting a two-way pager.

    Does that help with your confusion?

  65. I have a pager by wezelboy · · Score: 1

    I'm cool with it. It is simple. All kinds of stuff goes wrong with my cell phone all of the time, but the pager is rock solid.

  66. Nothing much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have carried a pager for 25 years. Messages are sent to the pager and my cellphone. Have yet to not receive a message on the pager. Cellphone messages always lag the pager message. Technically why the pager is better is because the noise floor for a radio receiver is dependant on bandwidth(Hz) times temperature(K). Pager has a narrow bandwidth and cellphone wide. Have not worked it out but noise floor for a cell will not be much below -100dBm and pager is below -120dBm. This means the pager is 100 times more sensitive to rf power than the cell. The low frequency of the pager seems to get better penetration into buildings etc. The low baud rate of the pager makes reception more reliable. Carrying 2 devices is inconvenient but the pager is far more reliable than the cellphone.

  67. Ug... yep by markdavis · · Score: 1

    Hate to admit it but, yep... I carry an alpha pager with me as well as a phone. Why? Because pagers have a much better coverage area, and are generally more reliable. It is used not only for emergency alerts (system down, etc) but also inside the huge building by people to alert to call them (they don't supply cell phones, nor do I want a "work" cell phone, nor do I want my users having MY phone number).

    I hope to rid myself of it one day... cell coverage has improved so much over the years. If I could find a way to SIMULATE a pager with a separate phone number, I might could try right now....

  68. Of course by srhoades · · Score: 1

    Each night I take it off and put it next to my VCR and lava lamp so I know where it is in the morning.

  69. Nothing wrong with trailing edge tech, except this by PingKin · · Score: 1

    The radio networks to support the pagers are shrinking. I had one for my job, because I needed to be on call after work hours. It worked great, it did one job and did it damn well.
    The problem was the coverage area started to shrink. The paging company could no longer afford to pay for the tower leases to maintain their network, so we started losing coverage in rural areas. Now I have a damned iPhone to maintain, charge, etc. Ugh!
    I HIGHLY recommend at least trying a pager if you are going to spend your time in an urban area! Outside that, coverage may be iffy. I miss mine terribly...

  70. texting and a spare battery by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    Some years ago, us sysadmins went from pagers to cell phones, with the alert system sending SMS via email, which is very close in function than what we used to get from pagers. I typically set the phone to some loud and obnoxious sound for a text, something that will wake me up. People who know me, know the very specific noise it makes.

    One critical disadvantage we noticed right away is that cell phones don't last very long on a full charge. Even in the days before smartphones that last less than a day on a full charge, cell phones did not have the longevity of pagers, which could go a whole week or more on one battery.

    Soon the practice was for the on-call person to carry about his or her person a cell phone and a spare battery. It was common to see an admin with the large bulge in their cargo pant thigh pocket for the cell phone and a slightly smaller bulge in other thigh pocket for the spare battery.

    When cell phones with non-replaceable batteries started appearing, we got special dispensation to keep using a model with a replaceable battery. Now with external batteries being available, I don't know if this is still critical or just a convenience, but personally I prefer to swap out the battery rather than have a weight dangling off the phone.

    If you decide to go with a pager, you should probably check on pager range, as it might have changed since the old days, as fewer people are using them. Whereas, I believe (but am not positive) that SMS works while roaming.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  71. Old Nokia by jeneag · · Score: 1

    Back in the days when you bought a phone, battery lasted until new model came out. Like this one: nokia 1100: http://i1.wp.com/pictures.joko...

  72. Samsung Note 4 and better phones have... by PotatoHead · · Score: 1

    ...an insane long standby time.

    When I full charge that thing, it can take a call or text for like two weeks. Maybe using that mode is worth a thought. It's still useful for web browsing, e-mail, text, etc...

    (And yes, I tested that on a long trip, no charger. Got 10 days, no problem, took a few calls, answered a few e-mails, various SMS.

  73. Careful ... what is an "emergency"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As somebody who works in technical support for a large vendor - your customer's definition of an "emergency", my sales team definition of an "emergency", and my technical definition of an "emergency" all vary significantly. Make sure you set guidelines and expectations before you offer up this service. Kudos for going above and beyond starting out but be careful where this becomes the expectation to be available 24x7 rather than the exception.

    On the technical level - if you are in locations frequently where you don't have cell service - pager. If you are in cell coverage 95%+ of the time, get USB battery packs.

  74. How to integrate? by manu0601 · · Score: 1

    This story is the opportunity to ask: how can a pager be integrated with IT systems? Are there standards to send a message? Is there an associated fee?

  75. stop working for a commie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Join team Trump lots of less work convincing people to be a communist. Seriously!

  76. Second tier smartphone by Tony+Isaac · · Score: 1

    Flagship phones use a lot of battery, in the interest of making the most powerful, cool devices out there.

    Second-tier phones like the Moto G are less powerful, but they still run Android just fine, and they use a lot less battery power. These phones can easily last 2-3 days on a single charge. The one exception is when you use the GPS, in which case you need to keep it (or any phone) plugged in to a charger constantly while using that feature.

  77. redundancy is important but be realistic. by Psychofreak · · Score: 1

    I have WIRED landlines in my house, not just cordless. Next to my bed and in the kitchen. I have the cell phone. I have the battery packs, chargers, and all that.

    Pager, no. Never again.

    The wired phones were installed the day after the cell phone was dead, and the cordless phone too. A concerned coworker ended up showing up with the cops at 3am...

    --
    Laugh, it's good for you!
  78. Work in a semiconductor fab. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We all have pagers. They work in places where cell phones will not.

  79. Re: Extra battery? tsarkon reports by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not gay and I love you

  80. Re:Pagers shared in work group for emergency conta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And that's why you don't work in emergency services. Reliability Engineering is a thing, and every additional link in the chain adds additional failure points.

    And single failure points are also a problem, which is why 15 years ago we switched from a single phone number shared physically, to simple systems capable of calling multiple numbers. Things happen to people and equipment, and I've seen on call people end up in car accidents, get a shared page soaked in water, and get mugged. Automated systems that call a person and their supervisor, and keeps calling more people until the problem is dealt with, is about as reliable as it gets for a given sized team. If it is important enough, then you'll deal with the inconvenience of an a person not on call getting called because of problems further up the chain.

  81. Fax machines are standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fax machines are still standard in med-legal communication, between doctors offices, lawyers, insurance companies, government agencies, process servers, courts, companies that copy records...I'm sure I left some entities out.
    I know, cause I don't have one.

  82. get a better phone by kuzb · · Score: 1

    My HTC One M8 gets just over two days of standby time and up to a day of battery if I'm actively using it. If your phone is dying at the worst times, get a phone that doesn't suck.

    --
    BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
  83. Not Big In Japan by DeathSquid · · Score: 1

    I live in Japan. No, fax machines are not common here anymore. Most established businesses probably still have one in case someone wants to send them a fax, but that's true everywhere. A startup wouldn't think of wasting money on one. According to the article you can still buy cassette tapes in most convenience stores. Nope. Just checked. And traffic lights here are automatic, just like everywhere else. Where there is roadwork, there may be humans present to manage traffic. Just like in the west.

    There is an unending stream of "XXX in Japan!" bullshit constantly streaming out of the western mass media. Is it because they think nobody will fact check them?

  84. Yes and Yes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Total coverage.
    Several weeks on one battery.
    Receives only important information.

    They will have to pry it from my dead hands!

  85. please enter a subject by notsoclever · · Score: 1

    Amazon still uses pages for their oncall, because pagers still have a better SLA than cellphones. However, it comes at a price: their communications are unencrypted, and work on a broadcast basis. Also, they don't do a store-and-forward type thing (their "redundancy" is done by just broadcasting each message a certain number of times spaced apart), so if you're outside of the coverage area when a page goes off you'll never get it (unlike with SMS where most carriers will hold on to it until it's been delivered) so it's still not totally reliable. Personally I would recommend setting up a Twilio app that sends the message to email and SMS, and if not responded to within a certain period of time, starts calling phone numbers and using their text-to-speech API.

    --
    There are 10 kinds of people: ones who understand ternary, ones who don't, and ones who think this joke is about binary
  86. Get a dumb phone by 91degrees · · Score: 1

    My Nokia 3510i would last 3 days easily, and often managed 5 or so without a recharge. It was also quite good as a phone. When it was on vibrate, I could actually feel it.

    You can probably set up call forwarding so if your main phone dies, it goes to the backup.

  87. If you just need the phone and not the 'smart'... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rather than going with a pager which is one-way, or getting a battery pack for the smart phone (Which will make it even more brick-like than it is already), just do what I did and pick up an old Nokia phone!

    If you get one with a monochrome display, the battery will last over a week even when used, whereas most smart phones won't even last a day if you actually use them, and it is much smaller and compact than the ridiculously large slabs that smart phones have become.

    You lose out on fancy stuff like being able to browse the web or access twitbook but if all you need is a mobile phone then you can't beat it. Literally! Whereas smartphones get damaged if you even look at them funny, an old Nokia is practically indestructible.

  88. Landlines...it's FIBRE! by MindPrison · · Score: 1

    ...(in Japan) and a lot of people keep landlines, too.

    Err, yes - I believe the rest of the modern world would have landlines in the future, it's called Fibre Cable. It has long replaced the old Copper Wire, and wireless is still inferior to landlines. The speed of the light is the way to go.

    Here in Sweden a lot of us have 100/10 to 1000/1000mbit lines, they're all fibre cable with ping times and speed you can only dream of in a wireless scenario.

    --
    What this world is coming to - is for you and me to decide.
  89. 'Dead' tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh heck yes... as well as my old Nokia (Weeks worth of charge, indestructible, actually fits in a normal pocket), I still have my 'Palm Pilot' (A Sony Clié TH55 - Charge lasts just under a week, can input data without having to look at the screen, the interface still somehow manages to be as responsive as modern smart phones with 10x the CPU speed and RAM...).

    Fax machines? Still used; Staff just find it convenient as they haven't gotten the hang of scanning stuff in and attaching to e-mail, plus some things still have to go over fax as electronic copies are not accepted for legal reasons. We also have dot matrix printers for similar reasons (Carbon-paper copies!)

    Then there is old PC's - We have lots of old software that doesn't work on modern hardware, never mind modern operating systems, although there's been some experimentation with VM's for it.

    Landlines, yup - We like them because they can be relied on to work in emergencies, whereas cell-phones tend to crap out if there is e.g. a powercut that knocks out the local cell-tower (Thankfully most now have UPS' so this isn't as big an issue now) or overload from too many people trying to call at once.

  90. Like a question meant for the NHS! by alancam · · Score: 1

    The UK's national health service uses pagers for almost all rapid staff contact. And faxes are still used throughout most of the organisation for rapid transfer of information between primary and secondary care.

  91. Oldschool by nult · · Score: 1

    911#420

  92. How is that gonna... by denzacar · · Score: 1

    ...tell you that your phone has drained the battery and turned off cause SomeAppTM decided to drain you battery while trying to connect to the internet to download the latest fart noises?

    Point of a low-battery-use always-on device is that it is "turn-on and forget".
    Not that you CAN plug it in to charge five times a day or swap batteries when you notice that it is off.
    Spare battery is just another battery that you have to keep charged and carry with you - that only lasts hours instead of weeks or months.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  93. What is wrong with submitter? by evilviper · · Score: 1

    my phone likes to die at the most inconvenient times and leaves me out of touch with people.

    I don't see how this can possibly be a problem for a functioning adult human. Your phone has a more accurate fuel gauge than your car, and is infinitely easier to refuel when low:

    - There are very inexpensive and highly portable USB phone chargers powered by AA batteries, built-in high capacity rechargeable Li-Ion batteries, PV solar panels, hand-cranks, etc, etc.

    - Slightly less portable are pocket-sized "travel" chargers that plug into 100v-240v, 50/60Hz utility power. These are convenient if (instead of hunting wild game through the forest) you sit down to eat in a building (that may or may not be called a restaurant) roughly 3 times per day, like most of the rest of people who live in the 1st world. IMPORTANT NOTE: These chargers will work even while you're not eating, such as while you are at home, in a hotel suite, visiting friends, or working in an office.

    - And finally closing out the list are 12-24V automotive USB phone chargers, which will quickly replenish your phone's battery while it, and you, are spending time in an automobile, even if you don't happen to own the automobile in question...

    Note that all of these options will replenish your phone's battery, and extend its run-time, even while you are using your phone and would otherwise be draining the battery.

    With the business I'm starting requiring clients to be able to get ahold me quickly

    I'm guessing they don't just enjoy your quick and witty replies... Being able to send them a short e-mail from your pager probably won't keep them happy for long. In most cases, being paged is just a precursor to an important telephone call, which is not going to be possible if your cellphone battery is dead. It may also require a follow-up where you look-up some important notes from your records, or otherwise load some data from the internet. All things your pager won't help you to do, but a fully-charged cellphone likely will.

    Actually, I'm finding it hard to believe your quick response is all that important to anyone, if you lack even the rudimentary ability to keep a cellphone charged and operational through the day. This sounds more like a question about a parent keeping track of an irresponsible child.

    It's much easier swap out a AA battery once a month

    It's much easier to let a horse graze on the side of the road

    This is a false-dichotomy, anyhow, as it's clear you want to continue to use your phone. So the pager will be extra work and cost on top of that... absolutely NOT eliminating any effort for you, at all.

    do you have a pager? Do you still find it useful?

    No. Nobody has a pager, and nobody finds them useful.

    "the number of such devices in use has been plummeting each year"

    "We are turning down the service because very few people still use it," says Telus spokesman Chris Garretson. "This is thirty-year-old technology — the infrastructure is aging and replacement parts are difficult to get."

    http://www.cbc.ca/news/technol...

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  94. Re:I wouldn't do business with a pager based compa by sribe · · Score: 1

    It's called weighing the benefits. The benefits of a modern smart phone far outweigh the limited benefit of a reliable pager for the vast majority of scenarios.

    First off nobody said you have to give up your smartphone in order to use a pager.

    Second off, reliability is the only advantage of a pager, so if you do not need reliability, then hell no you don't need a pager.

    Your original post is still ridiculous; the idea that you'd turn down a company because they offer a more reliable emergency contact is just stupid.

  95. Re: Extra battery? tsarkon reports by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are the real MVP.

  96. Never Had One by jshackney · · Score: 1

    Never owned a pager. Wish I didn't have a leash^H^H^H^H^H cell phone.

  97. Decent Phon by scott_evil · · Score: 1

    Get a decent phone you backward bastard.

  98. our ops guys moved skytel - ting, but not me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We must acknowledge pages within 5 minutes, so we need two-way pagers with reasonable latency, and we like to deliver them over two radio channels, ex. two different cel carriers. Skytel used to be fine as one of them: it could do the job for mrc of $20 as of 2011. There is only one two-way pager company in the US, AFAIK, and that is Skytel which is now called American Messaging. They still sell paging plans. I asked for a new plan, and it's even cheaper than before: paid quarterly, it's about $10/mo. There are multiple "plans" etc., but whatever. Although they don't exist outside the US, where they have coverage they have advantages:

    - more convenient and reliable terminal than Android. It is a relief to be around a pager after being saturated with these fashion-driven CADT phones.
    - no device-bricking updates
    - no radio lockups requiring cycling airplane mode
    - no fiddling with how the ringer works, "high priority" notifications, "doze mode". By default it has two modes, ring and vibrate, clearly settable, and both of them do renotification for unread messages.
    - no spurious reboots
    - no spammy notifications for things other than pages that need constant unsubscribe-fiddling
    - 10x battery life
    - smaller and more durable
    - qwerty keyboard: faster input
    - screen is clearly visible in direct sunlight or darkness, without blinding you
    tl;dr it is a clearly superior device for the task in almost every way.
    - independent from cel network. We like to have two systems with uncorrelated failures to deliver pages because it's important not to miss them.
    - hassle-free and consistently-working email interface (slightly better than the email interface carriers offer to SMS and most competitors to them like Vitelity).
    - unlike one's expectation for a pager, the "two-way" feature includes recollecting pages you missed by moving out of coverage, similar to SMS, and this works well though blows the latency budget obviously
    - there is a privacy-nut "transmitter off" mode that allows you to still receive pages, if you don't move too far from the last place where you turned on the transmitter (eg city granularity), without being tracked by the gub'mint.

    We mostly-replaced them with dumbphones on Ting because:

    - coverage is worsening. It could be the devices are getting beaten up and receiving less well, but all pagers are used pagers so we have no way to order a fresh one, and there's no procedure I know of to get an old one calibrated. It could be the cash-strapped operating company is shutting down towers. It could be imagination and changing expectations. but the gap with celfone coverage is getting unacceptable.
    - latency is unpredictable. It went from being more predictable than SMS to less predictable.

    We deliver pages to the Ting dumbphones using a text-to-speech gateway. Some people use an SMS fast-path, but text-to-speech is more reliable than SMS so most have that in place as a backup. I use it with the rule, "voice-call me if I have not acked in 2.5 minutes," for example.

    Another disadvantage, shared by pagers and ting:

    - there is no polling mode, "prove that I have not gotten a page in the last 5 minutes. If you can't prove it, page me." Yes, there are coverage indicators, but they are basically worthless: coverage indicator doesn't prove you can receive a page, neither on ting nor skytel, and there's no feature to page you when coverage goes away like Nextel used to have.
    We have an experimental channel that does polling, and it's an improvement over plain Android without the embellishment because it warns you about reception but also catches problems like the disgustingly-common radio lockups. but because the chan

  99. Decent battery by MercTech · · Score: 1

    Get a phone with a better capacity battery, keep on charge when not walking with it, and ditch apps that use a lot of data that aren't work related.

    I chose a BLU Studio Energy. Dual sim slots so I have my business number and my personal number in one phone. 3 days between charging if I want to push it. (I do a lot of data)

    http://www.bluproducts.com/index.php/studio-energy

    --
    NRRPT/RCT
  100. Iridium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Iridium has two pager-like tools:
    - traditional pager. $173/mo + $800 device
    - delorme inreach. $65/mo + $290 device

    Prices are for unlimited pages.

    Traditional pager advantages:
    - better reception. It still doesn't work as reliably indoors as a phone, but it does work inside some buildings while delorme inreach certainly will not. The network sends each page to you several times and adds sequence numbers to the messages. The pager will extrapolate "missed message" warnings for you. However I don't know any way to retrieve the missed messages, only to know they have occurred. and to know for certain you may need to send yourself a page periodically to get a fresh sequence number; just exposing yourself to the sky for an hour isn't enough to get the warnings.
    - email interface: super-easy to integrate with ops stuff. To send pages to delorme inreach you have to screen-scrape. It looks possible but tbqh I haven't figured it out yet.
    - long battery life. It runs about three weeks on one AA.
    - no transmitter. Your location can't be tracked. though you must manually provide it on a web page to a granularity somewhat larger than US area code, ex. "Germany" is a zone.

    delorme inreach advantages:
    - two way. You can send SMS, email, and faceposts. It updates its location using the uplink so you don't need to use the web page to set your zone; it justworx.
    - fancy "cloud" features. It's meant for hikers and mountain climbers, so it reports your location on a web map to track your hike's progress every 10min. It has a bluetooth connection to android/iphone and includes subscription to delorme's second-rate topographic maps app. The GPS is better than what's in phones and definitely does not have the surprising "only works with carrier coverage" so-called-but-not-really AGPS gotchya of many phones. You can send messages from the app over bluetooth, so you can use the android keyboard to type them.
    - totally-reliable reception whenever you can see the sky. almost-guaranteed no reception when you cannot. In a car or an airplane, it will work, unreliably, iff you push it up against a window.
    - there is a user-visible "last check-in" timestamp. You will have gotten all messages up to this timestamp with pretty high confidence. You also get an explicit L2 ack for messages you send. What they're able to deliver users on this underpowered device, on a carrier built in 90s that costs delorme ~$1/kByte, is an embarrassment to Hangouts.
    - the hardware is currently-manufactured, so it's cheap and is still getting firmware updates.
    - service is 1/3 the cost. service has "month-to-month" modes meant for camping. You are charged a yearly cost because fuck-you-pay-me, $20-$30. Then you can go to a web page and turn it on or off each month.
    - water-resistant

    disadvantages of delorme:
    - privacy. cumbersome cloud service with lots of data-retention is semi-mandatory. GPS metadata seems attached to most messages.
    - battery life. It depends on the page latency you request. It's about 18 hours at 2min latency, 30 hours at 10min latency.
    - no keyboard. receiving messages is not so bad, but sending anything except a preset reply without the bluetooth tether to android keyboard is painful.

    disadvantages shared by both:
    - no encryption

    Iridium is the oldest satellite network, which sounds bad but is not. It's bad in that it's low-bandwidth, yes, but they overspent on it. It's the largest constellation in number of satellites which means that it's flying low and has truly global coverage, and transmitting at a low frequency, so it may be the best one for making a pager. but I could be wrong.

    After trying both for a while, my plan is to use the traditional pager, and keep an Android phone from Google Fi in airplane mode. Perhaps because of the carrier auto-switching, the N6 radio is fast to acquir

  101. Slashdot home of the shameless plug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see a lot of adversisements coming across here as articles. Stopped reading this one at #feeltheburn

    It would be nice of the mods kept irrelevant plugs off the site.

  102. Re:I wouldn't do business with a pager based compa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are sails really more reliable than diesel engines. I thought sails had a problem with not working when there wasn't any wind, or the wind was blowing in the wrong direction.

  103. Transceivers and citizens band radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another way of communicating for free and self reliant (no need for network access or authentication) is CB radio.

    Also known as FRS, GMRS and BRS depending on where you live in the world.

    Just like pagers is more a thing from the past with everyone now staring at their phones and paying so much money to maintain them but it is an absolute must for quick short range communications or for when going on a convoy or journey where it can be used in an emergency.

  104. um by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it sounds like you keep forgeting to charge your phone. so get a pager and then you can forget to charge both.

  105. Re:Pagers shared in work group for emergency conta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Up until recently, the on-call team I managed had a pager, and I had to defend it's use several times when people wanted to switch to just calling mobile phones.

    But staff don't like customers calling their phones in the middle of the night, and invariably, customers call whoever they feel like, not the on-call person, so most of the on-call team turned their phones off at night, and just slept with the pager.

    This way, if their sleep was interrupted, they knew it was a genuine emergency and not some customer asking them to check if there was an issue. And the callout bonus made the sleep interruption worthwhile to them.

  106. Switch brand by DrYak · · Score: 1

    I've never seen a roll-up cable that can actually handle 1 A current. The wires are too thin; the phone will detect a voltage drop when it draws current and limit the current. It's more like 300-500 mA.

    Strange, I've never found a roll-up cable that *doesn't*. Maybe you should switch the brand you're using ?
    I've have success with both Hama brand and the internal brand sold at Conrad.
    Currently using renkforce cables.
    All of these are correctly used by the phone, and the phone's own system software reports charging at 1A.

    Maybe your problems actually come from the *wallwart charger itself*.
    The official USB specs only state for 500mA max current (and that's only after software negotiation. Otherwise it's 100mA straigh out of the box. But except for the OpenMoko I've never seen a phone that doesn't go straight for 500mA)
    1A isn't an actual USB standard (neither 2.1A for that matters).
    Most charger advertise this higher current support with special tricks on the data lines (short them, put a resistor accross them, etc.)
    Maybe your phone doesn't correctly recognise this ? (charger and phone using two different way to advertise higher current ?)

    Old Hama chargers used to come with a small USB dongle that you could plug in between the charger and the cable called an "iPhone adapter". That would short the data lines in a different way which was better detected by iPhones and other phones (e.g.: my Palm Pre and HP Palm3) that fail to detect the 1A otherwise.
    Also useful for charging smartphones from a desktop PC (most of the desktop motherboard are able to deliver USB currents way beyond the 500mA spec without any hard. 1A is entirely possible on lots of motherboard, though not officially supported. One should do the research before frying an important motherboard).

    My only problem with the thin wires of roll-up cables, is that over time, they tend to get worn-up a bit faster than regular ones.
    (Though even regular cables wear eventually with all the pocket-transport-abuse).
    But at least roll-ups don't tangle.

    Samsung makes compact phone chargers for their low-end smartphones that do 700 mA and include a flexible wire with micro-USB on one end. Much less bulky than a separate USB cable.

    My use of a separate USB roll-up is:
    - can be used for other uses (quickly plugin the phone into an USB port for data transmission)
    - can leave the charger itself available to be plugged in: some powerbank have a direct USB prong
    - is easier to replace (its the most delicate part of my setup and gets worn up first. cheaper to replace just the cable rather than a whole charger-roll-up combo).

    As for UK plugs: stick the back of a teaspoon or similar object into the third, ground, hole, to open up the other two. Then, a euro plug will fit just fine. It probably violates electrical codes to do so, but whatever.

    The whole point is about having something small and compact fitting into the pocket.
    I'm not sure about you, but I clearly don't have the habit of carrying around a spare metal tea-spoon in my pocket. (Must be a British thing... :-P )

    More seriously, I've seen safer (as in not plugging random metallic objects into household power outlets) alternative solutions:

    - I've seen special outlets that can open the phase/neutral holes without a ground prong. The side holes open when two prongs are inserted at the exact same time (something which happens when an europlug is plugged in, but something which is NOT going to happen often when a toddler tries poking the holes with a sharp object). It's popular on universal plug adapters and the same mechanism is slowly gaining traction in other countries with 3-pronged plugs (Switzerland, maybe Italy too ?)

    - I've seen Euro power cord with a retractable plastic piece where the ground prong should be. Plugs into any standard euro-compatible outlet with the plastic retracted, and opens and connects to UK outlets with the plastic deployed.
    I don't know if this idea has ever moved out of the power-cords and into wallwarts. All the UK-ready wall warts I've seen use exchangeable face-plates (EU, UK and US/JP)

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
    1. Re:Switch brand by hankwang · · Score: 1

      1A isn't an actual USB standard (neither 2.1A for that matters). Most charger advertise this higher current support with special tricks

      It's called USB Battery Charging Specification and it's not a special trick. I admit that the roll-up cables that I have are all from (various, euro-equivalent) dollar stores, but I did actually measure the current passing through. What I see is that phones/tablet built-in chargers have a series of current settings, e.g. 300, 600, 900, 1200 mA and that they will take the highest one that does not cause the voltage to drop too much.

      There is another issue that makes comparisons hard: different phones have different cut-off points for the safe voltage. Combined with the fact that wall warts and power banks have output voltages varying between 4.8 and 5.2 V it's a lot of hit-or-miss. The best way to ensure that the cable resistance is not a limiting factor is to use AWG 24 (0.2 mm2) wires, but those are rather thick for a roll-up cable.

      I'm not sure about you, but I clearly don't have the habit of carrying around a spare metal tea-spoon in my pocket. (Must be a British thing... :-P )

      I am neither a spoon carrier nor British. But I found that in British hotels and B&Bs, a tea spoon is usually available. :-) When I travel, I usually have many USB-chargeable things around: my and my SO's phones, tablet, several power banks. I'd prefer to have one data-capable USB cable and not so many USB-A connectors for charging.

  107. Re:I wouldn't do business with a pager based compa by Dynedain · · Score: 1

    Your original post is still ridiculous; the idea that you'd turn down a company because they offer a more reliable emergency contact is just stupid.

    Reread the post, I didn't make that claim. Though I understand the author's sentiment. I believe they meant the company's primary point of contact being a pager is problematic, as it could indicate someone very unsophisticated with modern technologies. A similar concern is when the company's email address is one from aol.com. It is a valid warning indicator.

    --
    I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
  108. Re:I wouldn't do business with a pager based compa by sribe · · Score: 1

    believe they meant the company's primary point of contact being a pager ...

    1) That's not what the post said. It said as "a point of contact".

    2) Seriously? You really think that because somebody has a pager that's a "valid warning indicator" that they do not have a cell phone???

  109. Re:I wouldn't do business with a pager based compa by Dynedain · · Score: 1

    Yes. If someone only lists a page number, and not a cell number, then that worries me about their availability and familiarity with modern technology. I may hire them as a plumber, but for a technology-related service I would consider looking elsewhere.

    --
    I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
  110. Advantage of a Pager by RespekMyAthorati · · Score: 1
    The biggest advantage of a paper over a cell phone is that the pager is much less likely to be in a "dead zone" and can even receive messages deep underground. According to wikipedia:

    Commercial paging transmitters typically radiate 1000 watts of effective power, resulting in a much wider coverage area per tower than a mobile phone transmitter, which typically radiates around 0.6 Watts per channel.

    This is a huge advantage for emergency services.

  111. USB Power by DrYak · · Score: 1

    It's called USB Battery Charging Specification and it's not a special trick.

    I haven't been paying attention that the various hacks have eventually gotten standardised. Thank you for the pointer.

    I admit that the roll-up cables that I have are all from (various, euro-equivalent) dollar stores, but I did actually measure the current passing through. What I see is that phones/tablet built-in chargers have a series of current settings, e.g. 300, 600, 900, 1200 mA and that they will take the highest one that does not cause the voltage to drop too much.

    My Jolla goes to the highest available charging profile (1100mA) on my current setup.
    If the cable is the only difference between your phone switching to 600mA or 1200mA profiles, then you should definitely try other brands (speaking of euro-zone: I definitely have good luck at conrad).
    Or maybe it's showing early signs of being worn.

    Combined with the fact that wall warts and power banks have output voltages varying between 4.8 and 5.2 V it's a lot of hit-or-miss.

    Part of the reason why I avoid buying dead cheap no-name asian accessories. They cut corners to get that cheap and might trade voltage output quality (or worse, trade some safety feature, as might have been the case with fire started by some of the cheapest chinese "hoverboards" electric segway-thingies)

    The best way to ensure that the cable resistance is not a limiting factor is to use AWG 24 (0.2 mm2) wires, but those are rather thick for a roll-up cable.

    Either that, or realising that you don't need a 3km-long charging cables. Mine are even less than 1m, maybe that's also why I've got less resistive problems.

    I am neither a spoon carrier...

    ...relieved that you're not a Ginosaji :-D

    When I travel, I usually have many USB-chargeable things around: my and my SO's phones, tablet, several power banks. I'd prefer to have one data-capable USB cable and not so many USB-A connectors for charging.

    My approach is a (little bit bulky) 25W charger with 5x USB output (with some of the ports able to deliver up to 2.1A, if the total load permits).
    Has a standard IEC 60320 C8 (aka "figure of 8") electric coupler, and I have a corresponding powercord with retractable prongs that can be pluged in most power outlets.
    It's slightly bigger than a smartphone or high-capacity powerbank, so it's not something I keep in my pocket, but it *the* thing to bring in my backpack when abroad. I'm fed-up having to fight for the single free power outlet in the room. Specially since I'm a huge geek and have several devices to charge.

    Having a microUSB-to-lightning adapter for when the girl has an iPhone helps.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
    1. Re:USB Power by hankwang · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, shops don't advertise the maximum current capability of the USB cables. I've had A brands and B brands and it's a hit or miss. The original Nexus 5 and Nexus 7 cables are 24 AWG, about a meter length and fairly flexible. But you can't buy them separately. And as for Conrad: I have a 5000 mAh power bank from Conrad. It is capable of delivering 1.0 A at 4.8 V. Consequence: apart from my 5 ohm test resistor, nothing will actually draw more than 500 mA. The only good thing about it is that it can charge and discharge at the same time.

  112. Yes I have one by Chris6502 · · Score: 1

    I am an EMT and have a pager and it is not just useful it is absolutely essential.

    Caveat: I live in Green Bank, WVa. The city without cell phones, wifi etc etc.

    I think pagers are still pretty widespread in the emergency services. At least volunteer departments where we are on call 24/7 and not sat in a station when on duty.

    --
    UNIX: 'cuz you can tattoo it on your knuckles!