I'll take even one step further. Ms.Rice maybe many things; But stupid ain't one of them. I would say your letter is cleverly false; Unless the state department stands by it. And I don't see that assumption occuring at all.
There is a lot of french bassed open sores out there. Anybody write a book on software design in france, you would be lible. Anyone demonstrating software data flow, you would be in trouble. Anybody who did this outside of France, and entered France would be in trouble.
Maybe a key business deal from Redmond went further than expected?
There is an existing method to change the data in the Wikipedia. Maybe before making a law, one might consider reading the web page in question to see "What one can do for his country".
Well, this does answer some critical marketing questions of why IE is so well recieved in the "internet community". With all due respect to the virus writer, and the efforts this person put fourth into their craft; Um, what are the addresses of those porn sites?
Personally, I don't give A damn about their backgrounds. But I do care a whole lot about my vote. If Diebold, et.al. can't provide a paper trail of manual votes, then there's something fish smelling at their software offices. Their actions are treasonable, to me.
BTW; Sociopaths don't care what people think, or the next level results of their actions.
Actually, they provide a way for you to do to someone elses computer what you wish without regard for your actions on that other person. "Flamebait!", you say? I say, "Sony, 2005."
I guess I'll have to wait for the class action law suit of Child Services vs. the parents for letting their children endanger themselves. And if I think more about it, the parents in both law suits did all the work.
First and formost, Sony is not run by a bunch of bumbling village idiots; These corperate administrators hide behind the name Sony as their sheild. It would not surprize me to see a Very high up Sony technicrat "retire" early.
Granted, Sony bought the software from a third party source, that still does not reduce their liability. Sony, if not caught, would have benefited from the actions of the software they purchased. Sony's solution is pathalogical at the very least.
But lets consider the government in all of this. The U.S. Government thinks its OK to allow strangers to enter our homes, without asking for permission? I think this is a constitutional law question that should be resolved. I think the someone that allowed this to happen should be allowed to retire early, also.
Lets see. Use a CD, go to jail. There will always be loud passionate voice out there to say, "Priates are Priates, Hang Them All." But IS there a violation of copy write? Is the original reason for copy write being ignored? Who are the ones profiting from this ultra conservitive definition of the law? Are the ones who benefit really the ones who made the copy writted material. Should copy writes be assignable? Is the impact of copy write becoming a negative to Joe Average Six-Pack? Are the real copy write victums the ones being sued?
"...Blacklight Power, has tens of millions of dollars in investment lined up to bring the idea to market."
Most marketing firms would have stuffed a sock in this person's mouth at this point; Because without a working model, it's just noise that wakes up any competitors. But consider the Venture Capitalists here. V.C.'s make their money by selling the idea to investors, not advertising by talking to the likes of/.
On a positive note. This V.C. Founder just might be the first to do it; Then I'll say, "I'm sorry."
The problem with Microsoft is that the Federal Justice Department says their evil. The innovations that Microsoft has brought to the market place have come at the price of being convicted a thief, and a cheat; These are not trivial accusations. I guess maybe that's why I'll never be a Billionaire; For me, good products, and good customer service without compromising ethics is still important.
I just can't help but wonder if there isn't a market for the kinds of data the Warden is looking at. Things like web history, register entries, email addresses, cookie data, personal data like credit card numbers, that kind of stuff. Naaaaaa; No decent person would want to buy that kind of stuff.
Slashdot Mirror
I'll take even one step further. Ms.Rice maybe many things; But stupid ain't one of them. I would say your letter is cleverly false; Unless the state department stands by it. And I don't see that assumption occuring at all.
There is a lot of french bassed open sores out there. Anybody write a book on software design in france, you would be lible. Anyone demonstrating software data flow, you would be in trouble. Anybody who did this outside of France, and entered France would be in trouble.
Maybe a key business deal from Redmond went further than expected?
Simple Logic:
If it is discovered that the locks on a "car" do not work, then a factory recall would in order.
Lets try some substitution here:
If it is discovered that the locks on a "computer software" do not work, then a factory recall would in order.
Q.E.D.
My eyes stopped working while reading output from a command line console! I was reminded why "Menu Driven" systems were fantastic back then.
There is an existing method to change the data in the Wikipedia. Maybe before making a law, one might consider reading the web page in question to see "What one can do for his country".
Well, this does answer some critical marketing questions of why IE is so well recieved in the "internet community". With all due respect to the virus writer, and the efforts this person put fourth into their craft; Um, what are the addresses of those porn sites?
In the wild, Linux root-kits/worms/virii last about two to three weeks? But for the misunderstood of Redmond; We have a different unit of measure...
Personally, I don't give A damn about their backgrounds. But I do care a whole lot about my vote. If Diebold, et.al. can't provide a paper trail of manual votes, then there's something fish smelling at their software offices. Their actions are treasonable, to me.
BTW; Sociopaths don't care what people think, or the next level results of their actions.
"...Microsoft provides you nothing with windows."
Actually, they provide a way for you to do to someone elses computer what you wish without regard for your actions on that other person. "Flamebait!", you say? I say, "Sony, 2005."
Why does Microsoft remove preprocessing statements in XMLDocuments that pass through its web services product?
I guess I'll have to wait for the class action law suit of Child Services vs. the parents for letting their children endanger themselves. And if I think more about it, the parents in both law suits did all the work.
This is funny! Somebody put a stress analyiser on a Kerryokie microphone? Well, standing in long lines is going to be a little bit more fun.
By the way. If I'm happy I'm about to butcher 350+ infidels in a firey crash; I should fear this new screening method?
Isn't the new Microsoft Office a subscription as in, "let's keep paying for the same thing over, and over again?"
I wish there was a SDK for clippy, the fun I could have by making a tweak here, and a nodge there... Muhahahahahah
Just one question. What's 'x'?
Hell, I'd be VERY satisfied with having the body I had at 26. I'll take care of the rest; Thank you.
First and formost, Sony is not run by a bunch of bumbling village idiots; These corperate administrators hide behind the name Sony as their sheild. It would not surprize me to see a Very high up Sony technicrat "retire" early.
Granted, Sony bought the software from a third party source, that still does not reduce their liability. Sony, if not caught, would have benefited from the actions of the software they purchased. Sony's solution is pathalogical at the very least.
But lets consider the government in all of this. The U.S. Government thinks its OK to allow strangers to enter our homes, without asking for permission? I think this is a constitutional law question that should be resolved. I think the someone that allowed this to happen should be allowed to retire early, also.
"Weeeee have very small penis; Youuuuu have very Biiiiiig penis." - Matt Stone and Trey Parker.
Lets see. Use a CD, go to jail. There will always be loud passionate voice out there to say, "Priates are Priates, Hang Them All." But IS there a violation of copy write? Is the original reason for copy write being ignored? Who are the ones profiting from this ultra conservitive definition of the law? Are the ones who benefit really the ones who made the copy writted material. Should copy writes be assignable? Is the impact of copy write becoming a negative to Joe Average Six-Pack? Are the real copy write victums the ones being sued?
So how long before I can "Print" an organ that will allow me implant my iPod?
"...Blacklight Power, has tens of millions of dollars in investment lined up to bring the idea to market."
/.
Most marketing firms would have stuffed a sock in this person's mouth at this point; Because without a working model, it's just noise that wakes up any competitors. But consider the Venture Capitalists here. V.C.'s make their money by selling the idea to investors, not advertising by talking to the likes of
On a positive note. This V.C. Founder just might be the first to do it; Then I'll say, "I'm sorry."
The problem with Microsoft is that the Federal Justice Department says their evil. The innovations that Microsoft has brought to the market place have come at the price of being convicted a thief, and a cheat; These are not trivial accusations. I guess maybe that's why I'll never be a Billionaire; For me, good products, and good customer service without compromising ethics is still important.
You've got to ask yourself, "Why would a world wide corperation create a new product when they've made Billions, (with a "B"), on the old one?"
And the Clicks AREN'T Free!
I just can't help but wonder if there isn't a market for the kinds of data the Warden is looking at. Things like web history, register entries, email addresses, cookie data, personal data like credit card numbers, that kind of stuff. Naaaaaa; No decent person would want to buy that kind of stuff.