Slashdot Mirror


Blizzard Sued for Death of Gamer

Somatic writes "In the latest saga over online gaming addiction in China, the parents of a 13-year-old Tianjin boy are suing the makers of World of Warcraft, blaming the game for the death of their son, according to the Chinese news agency Xinhua. The parents filed a suit against Blizzard Entertainment on Wednesday, saying their son jumped to his death while reenacting a scene from the game, the report said. The parents are backed by the anti-Internet addiction advocate Zhang Chunliang. Mr. Chunliang has spoken to 63 parents whose children have allegedly suffered from online gaming addiction and plans to file a class-action suit, according to the report."

544 comments

  1. Relavent link by suso · · Score: 5, Funny
    1. Re:Relavent link by vivarintoki · · Score: 0

      The joke's on you buddy. Perhaps by cutting yourself off from socity, you'd be doing society a favor.

    2. Re:Relavent link by AussieVamp2 · · Score: 1

      Darwin award gets tougher to win all the time, by the looks of it?

    3. Re:Relavent link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do now about the Onion, don't you?

    4. Re:Relavent link by Mayhem178 · · Score: 0

      Here is the solution to preventing idiocy in children: Proper Discipline

      --

      "You will pay for your lack of vision..." - Emperor Palpatine to Ray Charles

    5. Re:Relavent link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really, just make some Highly Radioactive Onion Rings (recipe in tommorows issue of The Onion) and eat them.

    6. Re:Relavent link by BushCheney08 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I realize the link is a joke, but it doesn't hit too far from the truth. I'm amazed that someone hasn't tried to outlaw footballs or baseballs. After all, there's a good chance of death resulting from their proper usage.

      --
      Be a real patriot: Question authority. Think for yourself. Formulate your own conclusions.
    7. Re:Relavent link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If that's what it takes to prevent you from breeding, then I'm all for it.

      The Onion is a parody site, and you're an idiot.

    8. Re:Relavent link by przemeklach · · Score: 1

      lol, yeah I set myself up for that one.

    9. Re:Relavent link by IAmTheDave · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is the same thing as suing Coors or Budwiser for DUI deaths, or liver disease... addiction comes in all sorts of forms. You can't sue the maker of a legitimate product just because the person using said product has an addictive personality.

      I know this comment will get me modded bad, but some idiot kid jumping to his death to reenact some scene from WoW or whatever is just a perfect example of what we call "Natural Selection." Survival of the fittest, and if some kid isn't fit enough to know that jumping from on high will kill you dead, well, oh well. The article says nothing of severe depression, or drug abuse - so he just jumped to jump? That sure isn't Blizzard's fault.

      --
      Excuse my speling.
      Making The Bar Project
    10. Re:Relavent link by iCough · · Score: 1

      Funny stuff. Blizzard made the game, and then sold it to the kid. Why should blizzard take responcibilty of people's lives? This mean I can sue Sony for the contant "Disc Read Error" that has cause and over dose of stress. Hey look- I can now sue Microsoft because of people degrading my self confidence!

    11. Re:Relavent link by BlacBaron · · Score: 2, Funny

      I rather expected that to be a link to this

      --
      Update Watch - Automatic software update notification
    12. Re:Relavent link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      medicine and "compassion". fucking gene pool dregadation.

      was schlagen Sie uns vor, Herr Kommandant?

    13. Re:Relavent link by DrSkwid · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      That's right, there is no evolutionary pressure any more.

      dumbass

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    14. Re:Relavent link by MHobbit · · Score: 1
      Just a reminder to the users here that that links to TheOnion.com. As the Wikipedia article states:

      The Onion is a newspaper of parody and satire, published weekly in print and on the Internet. As of May 2005, its print editions are distributed in Madison, Milwaukee, New York City, Chicago, Minneapolis-St. Paul, Denver/Boulder, and San Francisco.
      --
      Debugging? Klingons do not debug. Bugs are good for building character in the user.
    15. Re:Relavent link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      I love how that article states "No one know exactly why the grenade exploded."

      IT WAS A GRENADE.

    16. Re:Relavent link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you are, what, 12? 13?

    17. Re:Relavent link by Jeremi · · Score: 3, Funny
      You can't sue the maker of a legitimate product just because the person using said product has an addictive personality.


      Evidently, you can. :^(

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    18. Re:Relavent link by kannibal_klown · · Score: 1
      This is the same thing as suing Coors or Budwiser for DUI deaths, or liver disease... addiction comes in all sorts of forms. You can't sue the maker of a legitimate product just because the person using said product has an addictive personality.

      Eh, I don't know. I'd say this is even dumber than suing Budweiser.


      DUI and Liver Disease are very forseeable events of drunkning recklessly. One is very simple to do (poor judgement) while the other is a result of drinking way too much. You don't NEED to be sick or an alchoholic to have a DUI, and it's possible to drink enough in your life to get liver disease without alcoholism too (though a lot harder). So by using their product as inteded you run a risk.


      A kid jumping to his death because he's too into the game is not foreseeable. You have to be really dumb or a few cards short of a deck to do this.


      This is probably even worse than suing WB for their Wiley Coyote cartoons. There Wiley is rarely hurt from jumping great heights while in WoW I'm sure they probably got hurt.

    19. Re:Relavent link by houghi · · Score: 1

      You can't sue the maker of a legitimate product just because the person using said product has an addictive personality.

      Tell that to the tobacco industry.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    20. Re:Relavent link by LifesABeach · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I guess I'll have to wait for the class action law suit of Child Services vs. the parents for letting their children endanger themselves. And if I think more about it, the parents in both law suits did all the work.

    21. Re:Relavent link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there is no evolutionary pressure any more in the realm of homosapiens dumbass. shit cock cunt fuck barbra streisand

    22. Re:Relavent link by hokeyru · · Score: 1

      Whatever the impetus, time limits in mmorpgs is a good idea. The games now not only encourage addictive behavior, but require it. You're just not competitive unless you put in 8 hours a day.

      I would propose setting up some servers as time-limited. Players who want to restrict themselves (and thier competitors) to x hours a week or month could play on said servers. Perhaps restrain the time-limits to only apply to leveling behavior. Travel, socializing could be "off the clock".

    23. Re:Relavent link by syukton · · Score: 1

      WoW already does this to a certain extent. You receive diminishing experience per kill the longer you play for a single session. Of course the solution there is to have a lot of alternate characters to play, but the upside is that if you only play 3 hours a night or whatever you will always be getting maximum experience per kill.

      --
      Reinvent the wheel only at either a lower cost, greater effectiveness, or your own personal enrichment and satisfaction.
    24. Re:Relavent link by KanSer · · Score: 1

      Problem: Dumb ass parents. Solution: Sue a fantasy game maker? Sue yourself, idiot.

      --
      • MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward Wednesday April 20, @4:20
    25. Re:Relavent link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They died because they have the dumbest parents, not because of the toy... gosh

    26. Re:Relavent link by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      since when ?

      you really have no idea what you're saying

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    27. Re:Relavent link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ok then list some stimuli for the evolutionary process is modern day humans.

    28. Re:Relavent link by tylernt · · Score: 0

      I love how that article states "No one know exactly why the grenade exploded."

      IT WAS A GRENADE.


      I'm not usually the sort to say "mod parent up", but I think he deserves it in this case.

      --
      DRM 'manages access' in the same way that a prison 'manages freedom'
    29. Re:Relavent link by sinij · · Score: 1, Interesting

      >> You can't sue the maker of a legitimate product just because the person using said product has an addictive personality. You can sue maker of a known addictive product for failing to provide adequate warning and selling it to minors. WoW is *designed* to be addictive, most of the game is straight out of Reinforcement Schedules/Conditioning psychology textbook.

    30. Re:Relavent link by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      do you mean humans from the last 50,000 years ?

      or the last 10 ?

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    31. Re:Relavent link by geekboy642 · · Score: 1

      Nice idea, but do you really want to be 15xp from the next level and be told, "Sorry, your time has expired. You may finish your level in 36 hours"?
      Better, you could remove the tedium of "grinding", and give those people who can't play 8 hours a day a reasonable edge, by removing the whole concept of leveling. Fights would train you directly, not your character. Your character would always be training for the next more powerful sword, gun, or spell, logged on or not. In this way, you would lose a portion of the unhealthy obsession, and there would no longer be an "addictive" requirement to the game. Well, beyond the fact that the game is probably really good, and that's addictive in itself.
      Anyways, if you want to try a game that has managed to miss most of Blizzard's mistakes, try EvE.

      --
      Just another "DOJ fascist authoritarian totalitarian bootlicker" -- Zeio
    32. Re:Relavent link by Kaboom13 · · Score: 1

      This is not exactly true. The way the rested system works is when you log out in an inn, you start to gain "rested" experience. The longer you are logged out the more you get. When you return, every monster you kill gives you double experience until it runs out, regardless of how long it takes you. However an entire days worth of rested will probably be less then 1 hour of killing at a reasonable rate. Either way it is not really practical to wait for rested xp. Due to negative reaction from players, the whole resting system was changed heavily from it's initial idea in beta to be purely a bonus, and a relatively small one at that. Anyways, theres only 2 states, rested and non-rested, and no diminishing returns.

    33. Re:Relavent link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      let's say the last 100 years since i said "medicine and compassion" in the original post

    34. Re:Relavent link by kermitthefrog917 · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      This reminds me of a T-shirt I saw at www.thoseshirts.com

      Top 10 gun safety rules

      9) "Dumb children may get a hold of your guns and shoot eachother. If your children are dumb, put them up for adoption to protect yor guns"

      --
      I may be wrong but you're downright ugly!
    35. Re:Relavent link by zakezuke · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is the same thing as suing Coors or Budwiser for DUI deaths, or liver disease... addiction comes in all sorts of forms. You can't sue the maker of a legitimate product just because the person using said product has an addictive personality.

      Actually... I seem to recall that there was one person who successfully sued some mfg. of spirits when her child was born with birth defects. Since then I there is a nice spiffy little warning label. And alcohol is not exactly the catagory of "legitimate" product... not like Methamphetamines which were onces prescribed like candy.

      http://print.injury.findlaw.com/accutane/articles/ 2023.html

      Not that I disagree with you. There is that film "Mazes and Monsters" staring a young Tom Hanks that revolves around a character who's so obsessed with a D&D style game after the death of his sibling IIRC he honestly believes that jumping off a skyscraper will result in some form of magical intervention that would reunite him with lost family. But as with this case of fiction it's generally accepted that anyone who can't tell the difference between reality and fantasy is well nuts... including the parents who showed this to their kids trying to get them to stop playing D&D.

      http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0084314/

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    36. Re:Relavent link by Taladar · · Score: 1

      So you basically want to convert MMORPGs into MMOFPSs? Worst idea ever. If characters don't gain anything from playing you basically have a different genre. And one at least as addictive too. Not to mention the fact that lag makes involvement of player "skills" a lot more unfair than the character skill system most RPGs employ.

    37. Re:Relavent link by camg188 · · Score: 1

      I also like how the article calls 19 and 20 year olds "youths" and "youngsters". Playing catch with a grenade at 2AM... I think maybe alcohol was involved.

    38. Re:Relavent link by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      ok :

      The influeza pandemic post WW1

      HIV/AIDS

      Suitability for city living

      World Hunger :
      http://library.thinkquest.org/C002291/high/present /stats.htm

      In 1994 the Urban Institute in Washington DC estimated that one out of 6 elderly people in the U.S. has an inadequate diet.

      The infant mortality rate is closely linked to inadequate nutrition among pregnant women. The U.S. ranks 23rd among industrial nations in infant mortality. African-American infants die at nearly twice the rate of white infants.

      Every 3.6 seconds someone dies of hunger

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    39. Re:Relavent link by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A kid jumping to his death because he's too into the game is not foreseeable. You have to be really dumb or a few cards short of a deck to do this.

      On the other hand, it should be obvious that jumping too far will kill you - I learned that lesson like a lot of other kids by jumping out of a tree. 10 feet is ok, but 15 sucks!

      his is probably even worse than suing WB for their Wiley Coyote cartoons. There Wiley is rarely hurt from jumping great heights while in WoW I'm sure they probably got hurt.

      Yup. My first WoW death was from jumping out of a tree. Of course, I mainly wanted to see what would happen when you die. This kid learned the hard way that, in real life, you don't walk from the nearest graveyard to your body and go get your stuff fixed.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    40. Re:Relavent link by jcr · · Score: 1

      You can't sue the maker of a legitimate product just because the person using said product has an addictive personality.

      You can sue for anything at all. If your suit is frivolous, the court will bitch-slap you.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    41. Re:Relavent link by blazzy · · Score: 1

      Hot Potato.. Extreme!!!!!11

    42. Re:Relavent link by pstils · · Score: 1

      this should read: fun toy banned because of stupid implementation of the law whilst these kids have brought about their own demise, they did not issue the ban. yes we do have to share the planet with morons. unfortunately most of them survive childhood and go on to implement law.

    43. Re:Relavent link by raoul666 · · Score: 1

      You can't sue the maker of a legitimate product just because the person using said product has an addictive personality.

      Like cigarettes?

      --
      When cryptography is outlawed, bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl
    44. Re:Relavent link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow you are seriously retarded. how are those pushing humans to evolve? they're not. are humans now more immune to the flu after the post WWI pandemic? here's a hint: no.
      is human dna changing to make humans more suitable for "city living"? again: no.
      what the hell does world hunger have to do with anything? unless you were to give proof that because world hunger some humans were mutating to actually be able to digest cellulose, which that link doesn't show.
      how is "old people have bad diets" a stimulus for evolution? it's not.
      dietary habits of mothers is not evolutionary evidence. how can you compare or contrast african-americans with whites? do you mean european-americans vs african-americans, or do you mean whites vs blacks. but it doesn't matter because those have nothing to do with evolution or even genetics besides being a group of phenotypes to arbitrarily group people together. seriously, hunger as a driving force for evolution in humans? are you seriously that idiotic?

      nothing in this world is having a significant enough effect on humans so that our dna changes in a large enough population or that a significant mutation is being spread via natural selection due the advantage gained by the mutation, therefore i am right you and are wrong--get over it.

    45. Re:Relavent link by DrSkwid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      every new born is a mutation

      competition for resources is a evolutionary pressure

      fitness for lifestyle is an evolutionary pressure

      resistance to disease is an evolutionary pressure

      I don't think you have a comprehension of the timescales evolution works on

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    46. Re:Relavent link by aidfarh · · Score: 4, Funny

      Problem: Dumb ass parents.

      Solution: MOD PARENTS DOWN!

      --
      There is no sig.
    47. Re:Relavent link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      even if a new born has an advantageous mutation it's not going to spread throughout modern man through breeding and natural selection no matter the time scale
      there is no competition for resources for humans in a natural way, the competition has nothing to do with the biology of our species just money and politics, no matter the timescale
      getting in shape, no matter the timescale, is in no way an 'evolutionary pressure'
      we will never gain resistance to influenza, hiv, or even the common cold, no matter the timescale, unless you count genetic engineering which is cheating

      you obviously don't understand even basic scientific concepts, this conversation is over

    48. Re:Relavent link by daniel_mcl · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A single incident is not an example of natural selection, any more than the collision of two particles is an example of the ideal gas law. Common sense is not genetic, and what we consider common sense isn't necessarily anti-survival. I'll bet that this kid, had he lived, would have quickly begun engaging in unprotected sex with multiple partners, which would be doing a lot more to promote his genetic material than most of us are doing. Evolution is a scientific theory just like Maxwell's equations or quantum mechanics. If you wouldn't feel comfortable talking about the latter, you likely talk about the former at your peril.

      --
      I used to read Caltizzle. I was a lot cooler than you.
    49. Re:Relavent link by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      Tell that to the tobacco industry.

      The tobacco industry got into trouble for a) deliberately engineering their products to be more addictive, b) lying about it and c) going to great lengths to buy/threaten/discredit anyone who tried to provide evidence of their products' danger.

      Back in the day, smoking was promoted in advertising as *healthy* and *safe*.

      That said, I can't see how anyone under the age of about twenty-five to thirty has a leg to stand on with regards to blaming the tobacco corporations for any ill-health they might suffer from smoking.

    50. Re:Relavent link by bbtom · · Score: 1

      You can get the Onion elsewhere too. I've seen it here in London.

      --
      catch (HumourFailureException e) { e.user.send("You, sir, are a humourless idiot."); }
    51. Re:Relavent link by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      c l u e l e s s

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    52. Re:Relavent link by mr.+methane · · Score: 1

      You can sue virtually anyone for anything. Winning is another matter. Winning and collecting is still another.

      The negligience in these cases can creep in from the edges. If you know that a user is making use of a product in a way that is clearly dangerous, then most legal systems require you to warn the user of the danger. The auto companies have learned to tread this line very successsfully; they make products which kill hundreds of thousands of people worldwide every year, and maim millions more, yet only in very rare cases does anyone try to make the case that they are liable.

      MMORPG's are a new area. I would make the case that a large percentage (15-25% at a wild guess) suffer from a compulsive or obsessive psychological disorder. The games, purposely or not, are designed to exploit that disorder, leading to those individuals who have multiple active accounts and even pay other people to play for them.

      Do I think Blizzard is legally liable? Well, for one thing, I have almost zero knowledge of tort law in China. Here in the US, I would bet we will be seeing warnings on these games, but the makers may allow the "buzz" to be a marketing tool itself; how much do you need to advertise a game so good that people kill themselves over it?

      I think there are a lot of badly messed-up people playing Everquest, Lineage, and WoW. These games feed the obsessive personality type by creating a highly structured social environment combined with very repetitive and predictable interactions.

    53. Re:Relavent link by MMyers5 · · Score: 1

      Damn right! That'd be like suing the tobacco industry for getting lung cancer...oh wait.

    54. Re:Relavent link by mmalove · · Score: 1

      Can't you die from falling in the game? Surely if this kid has played WoW enough to blame behavioral modifications on the game, he's died at least once this way. Watch Blizzard up fall damage in game to compensate.

      --
      You can get 15 minutes of fame, but you can go down in history for infamy.
  2. Dear Parents... by charlesbakerharris · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Your kid is a moron. Please sue either (a) his genetic contributors or (b) the people who raised him poorly enough that he thought that reenacting a jumping scene from a computer game wouldn't result in his death. Anyway, I hope his last sight was looking up at the branches of Teldrassil. I hear it's magnificent this time of year.

    1. Re:Dear Parents... by _w00d_ · · Score: 1

      Exactly. This is like suing a casino for a gambling addiction instead of taking responsibility for one's addiction and getting help. If the kid was stupid enough to jump to his death, this is just a good example of Darwinism.

    2. Re:Dear Parents... by ankarbass · · Score: 1, Funny

      We are pleased to report that your son is now being considered in this years running for a prestigious darwin award. You should be very proud.

      --
      Wanted: Clever sig, top $ paid, all offers considered.
    3. Re:Dear Parents... by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      Your kid is a moron. Please sue either (a) his genetic contributors or (b) the people who raised him poorly enough that he thought that reenacting a jumping scene from a computer game wouldn't result in his death. Anyway, I hope his last sight was looking up at the branches of Teldrassil. I hear it's magnificent this time of year.

      The thing is that the parents are obviously stupid as well. These kinds of lawsuits have been going on for years, and they simply don't work. If the company is doing something inherently wrong, then a criminal proceeding would come against them by the government. If the company is doing something inherently dangerous or bad for the population in general, more than one fucking kid (that's yours) would be affected by said danger.

    4. Re:Dear Parents... by dazhichen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      maybe they should just sell the game bundled with a hard hat?

      - Dazhi Chen

    5. Re:Dear Parents... by audi100quattro · · Score: 1

      This is a 13 year old, his parents were probably making him play the game to get virtual things they could sell for real money. That has turned out to be quite a business especially in countries like china from what I read. :)

    6. Re:Dear Parents... by Shakrai · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Your kid is a moron. Please sue either (a) his genetic contributors or (b) the people who raised him poorly enough that he thought that reenacting a jumping scene from a computer game wouldn't result in his death.

      The key word in your suggestion and TFA's is "sue" of course.

      And to think, all this time I've been worried about our ability to successfully Americanize a billion Chinese. Seems like they are well on their way to adopting the very best of American culture and values ;)

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    7. Re:Dear Parents... by Jeremi · · Score: 0, Troll
      If the company is doing something inherently wrong, then a criminal proceeding would come against them by the government.


      I don't mean to defend the people involved in this case, but the above statement is simply naive. In many cases, the government either simply doesn't care enough (or have the resources) to prosecute, or is actively taking money from and colluding with the companies in causing the harm. And that's in the USA -- I can imagine the potential for negligence and corruption is much worse in undemocratic countries like China.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    8. Re:Dear Parents... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't believe that you guys are bold enough to actually curse that kid who died, and on top of that offend the parents and add to their pain. Whatever the cause of death may be, it is no funny matter. You guys are truly ill-mannered, and you show a great deal of disrespect to others. It is you who have not been raised properly ...

    9. Re:Dear Parents... by PunkOfLinux · · Score: 1

      Did you ever stop to think that it really, most likely, IS the parents' fault the kid died?

      All this bleeding-heart bullshit of "Who cares that you killed your own child by not raising him properly! I feel bad for you anyway, you son of a bitch!"

    10. Re:Dear Parents... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      corruption is much worse in undemocratic countries

      As if Democracy somehow drives corruption out.

      We'll see how the Republican party finishes up this presidential term with all of its leaders behind bars, assuming they get convicted for their corruption.

    11. Re:Dear Parents... by NetRAVEN5000 · · Score: 1
      Depends on how much harm it causes. In the 1800s when radioactive water was sold as a health product. . . you bet the government stepped in when they found out the harm that radioactive materials cause.

      You're right - there are many other matters where the government does not step in. But, you know, it's funny - there are some times when people criticize the government for being too laissez-faire, and there are others when it gets criticized for being too powerful and overbearing. Which I think is part of the reason why the government generally doesn't step in unless it sees it absolutely necessary ("if the company is doing something inherently wrong") - for example when a company is doing something that it knows poses a severe and direct danger, with absolutely no regard for the people using their products/services (hence why companies have recalls when they have sold something found to be dangerously faulty - like the exploding Firestone tire incident).

      For example, who's glad about the link above where the government banned the toy because the kid died by shooting its rocket in his nostril thinking it would come out his belly button, or the one who thought it had turned to candy when it shattered? I'm not - those kids were stupid. But there are other times when the government should step in - and the incident with the toy and this incident with WoW aren't it.

    12. Re:Dear Parents... by NetRAVEN5000 · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      "We'll see how the Republican party finishes up this presidential term with all of its leaders behind bars, assuming they get convicted for their corruption."

      Yeah, not like Bin Laden never tried to bomb the WTC while Clinton was in power or anything. Or got set free only to attack us again.

    13. Re:Dear Parents... by Secrity · · Score: 1

      Radium water reached the height of it's popularity in the 1920's and the US government didn't take action against radium water until the 1930's -- the US FTC took action against those products that had radiation levels that were TOO LOW.

      You do realize that the article about the Aqua Assault RoboFighters is satire, don't you?

    14. Re:Dear Parents... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least Clinton's worst crime was being unable to keep his fingers out of his intern then lying about it. The Republicans can't keep their fingers out of anything, and have yet to start telling the truth about any of it.

      When Cheney wants to talk about his "energy talks", let me know. Then we'll start discussing how "democracy" has protected us from corruption.

    15. Re:Dear Parents... by NetRAVEN5000 · · Score: 1
      Yeah, I know the thing about the toys was fake. But in this context I could see where it could happen. And it's still a perfect example of some bad legislation, real or not. Whether or not it really happened doesn't much matter - the kids made a stupid decision in the fake article, why should the toymakers pay? The kid in the real article made a REALLY obviously stupid decision - why should Blizzard pay for his stupidity?

      And, yes, the FTC did take action against products with radiation levels that were too low. However that happened BEFORE they found out that radiation was dangerous to your health - since radiation water was still believed to be healthy, they wanted companies to deliver "healthier" health water. Once they realized how bad radiation water was, they started to punish companies for selling radiation water.

    16. Re:Dear Parents... by Guuge · · Score: 1

      What does Bin Laden have to do with government corruption? Is Bin Laden the true power behind the Republican party? That's news to me.

    17. Re:Dear Parents... by NetRAVEN5000 · · Score: 1
      I was talking about Clinton, who was once the leader of the Democratic party, and the incident where he let Bin Laden go free after his attempt to bomb the WTC, and showing how wrong Clinton was to let Bin Laden go free.

      And as far as what Bin Laden has to do with government corruption. . . well, just look at his country! Women aren't allowed to even show their face, much less drive. And he corrupts his people into thinking that suicide bombings are good if they're to kill Americans.

    18. Re:Dear Parents... by Guuge · · Score: 1

      But what does that have to do with the original point made about corruption within the Bush administration? Bush is not part of Clinton's party. Bush's fellows are mostly from the Reagan & original Bush administrations. I see no credible link between Clinton and and the corruption in the government today.

      I continue to doubt these supposed connections between Bin Laden and corruption in the Bush administration. It's undeniable that the government of Saudi Arabia wields considerable influence in the White House, but I'm not convinced that Bin Laden himself holds sway within the Saudi government.

      I'll never be surprised when people blame Clinton for Bush's problems, but this is one of the weakest arguments yet. Do you expect anyone to believe that Clinton, through Bin Laden, somehow set the stage for a corrupt Bush regieme?

    19. Re:Dear Parents... by smashin234 · · Score: 1

      "I can't believe that you guys are bold enough to actually curse that kid who died, and on top of that offend the parents and add to their pain"

      So, we should respect parents who publicize how stupid their late son was? Give me a break. They could have mourned quietly and given their son dignity, but instead they opted to get rich.

      Obviously:

      Money > son's dignity.

      Maybe I shouldn't be so critical, but this story does remind me of many darwin award winners I read about.

    20. Re:Dear Parents... by whitehatlurker · · Score: 1

      I believe that (1) the kid would be too young to qualify and (2) as a purposeful suicide, this would be inelegible for a Darwin. (The latter isn't spelled out, but the act has to be something spectacular.)

      --
      .. paranoid crackpot leftover from the days of Amiga.
    21. Re:Dear Parents... by Anarchitect_in_oz · · Score: 1

      Clearly they have choosen to sue option b.

      --
      "Call us when the New age is old enough to drink" Beck
    22. Re:Dear Parents... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Say that to your country-men and women which has no dearth of drug-addicts either. They all are moron and deserve to die/suffer. Stop arresting drug pedlars. And yes, also why should the tobacco product manufacturing companies have to spend $25 billion for damages? They sold a legal product too.

    23. Re:Dear Parents... by NetRAVEN5000 · · Score: 1
      The comment I was responding to was trying to draw a connection between the Republican party and corruption. I'm not trying to connect the corruption of the Bush administration with the corruption of the Clinton administration, I'm just pointing out that the Clinton administration was also corrupt.


      I was not drawing a connection between Bin Laden and corruption and the Bush administration. Bush may want Saudi Arabia's oil, but I don't think he wants to negotiate with Bin Laden for oil, or that Bin Laden would be willing to negotiate in the first place.


      And no, I don't think that Clinton's incident with Bin Laden "set the stage for a corrupt Bush regieme" - I was just pointing out that Clinton's decision to let Bin Laden go free was STUPID, STUPID, STUPID. And no doubt it made things a hell of a lot harder for the Bush administration - Bush wasn't president for long when the Twin Towers fell. That's a hard thing for a rookie to pull a nation through.

    24. Re:Dear Parents... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Whatever the cause of death may be, it is no funny matter. You guys are truly ill-mannered, and you show a great deal of disrespect to others. It is you who have not been raised properly ...

      You must be new here. You really should get educated

  3. Re-enacting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Nowhere in that article does it prove that he was re-enacting a scene from the game. By this logic, any family member of someone who played the game and jumped to their death can sue for re-enacting a scene from this game. And surely, the game is not linear, so he would have chosen to jump off the cliff in game as he did in real life, no one forced him to, sue Blizzard for providing the method to fall, sue Nature for providing the method to fall.

    1. Re:Re-enacting? by back_pages · · Score: 1
      Nowhere in that article does it prove that he was re-enacting a scene from the game.

      For all we know, he could have been re-enacting Wile E. Coyote.

      (Clearly this reference might not apply in China, but in the broader context of blaming video games, there are precious few things left to be outraged about. What was so different in the 1960s that kids weren't offing themselves like lemmings whenever they saw the Roadrunner cartoons?)

    2. Re:Re-enacting? by S.O.B. · · Score: 1

      Just another case where people won't take personal responsibility and want someone else to pay for it.

      On a slightly related note, it's nice to see that western society has successfully exported nuisance lawsuits to China.

      --
      Some of what I say is fact, some is conjecture, the rest I'm just blowing out my ass...you guess.
    3. Re:Re-enacting? by rob_squared · · Score: 2, Funny

      Next thing you know, they'll be suing the creators of Mario when people start jumping down open manholes.

      --
      I don't get it.
    4. Re:Re-enacting? by whereiswaldo · · Score: 1

      What if someone jumps to their death to reenact the boy jumping to his death? Who gets sued then? Same thing, isn't it?
      I'm sorry the boy ended his life but blaming a game company is stupid. Each of us needs to take responsibility for our own actions. That so many people don't is one of the single biggest failings in the world today.

    5. Re:Re-enacting? by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      If my kid jumps from a window tomorrow, can I claim he was re-enacting a scene from "The Lives of Tianjin" and sue the parents ?

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    6. Re:Re-enacting? by InvalidError · · Score: 1

      Common sense has been discontinued some years ago, this is simply another sign of common sense becoming increasingly scarce.

      The earliest sign I know of is the well-known McDonald hot coffee case. AFAIK, this is the case that made suing everyone else for one's own stupidity and total lack of common sense into common practice.

    7. Re:Re-enacting? by emarkp · · Score: 1
      The earliest sign I know of is the well-known McDonald hot coffee case.

      Ironically, the McDonald's case is an example of a reasonable lawsuit. Read the the full story and stop citing it as an example of a frivilous suit.

    8. Re:Re-enacting? by Scarletdown · · Score: 1
      The earliest sign I know of is the well-known McDonald hot coffee case. AFAIK, this is the case that made suing everyone else for one's own stupidity and total lack of common sense into common practice.


      In the McDonalds case, McD was really negligent and at fault. As has been reiterated many many times here on Slashdot and elsewhere, they did keep their coffee way too hot (and I'm sure most people would agree that hot enough to cause third degree burns is indeed too hot), despite numerous complaints and warnings.

      http://lawandhelp.com/q298-2.htm More info on the case.
      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    9. Re:Re-enacting? by NetRAVEN5000 · · Score: 1
      See my previous post about this.

      And I wonder if they'll sue Keanu Reeves too - maybe the kid saw him jumping building-to-building in The Matrix which also made him think he had super jumping powers. Not that we don't ALL know the effects of gravity from falling off our bikes or off the monkey bars or anything and couldn't figure out that falling from high heights might hurt just a bit. Unless maybe he thought he saw Tank loading the "Jump" program for him. . .

    10. Re:Re-enacting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Next thing you know, they'll be suing the creators of Mario when people start jumping down open manholes.

      Kind of like this kid?

    11. Re:Re-enacting? by shmlco · · Score: 1

      I keep hoping that the US will export it's surplus of lawyers to China. Could be a nice little export industry ....

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    12. Re:Re-enacting? by InvalidError · · Score: 1

      How do you brew coffee at home?

      1) boil water (~100C, ~212F)
      2) pour on instant or ground coffee

      Who are you going to sue if you spill your home-brewed coffee on yourself? I know I can burn myself with freshly boiled water and there is no reason for me to treat other similarly brewed drinks as any less potentially hazardous. Freshly brewed coffee will also be close to 100C even without temperature-controlled standby heaters... so I am guessing brewed-on-command stuff like espressos are served at near-boiling-point when black.

      Boiled water can cause serious burns, coffee is made by pouring boiled water on grains therefore freshly brewed hot coffee of any origin is an equally serious hazard. There is no reason for this simple bit of common sense to be any different at home, work, restaurants, coffee shops or anywhere else.

    13. Re:Re-enacting? by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      I *want* my coffee hot. Not lukewarm, like that dumbass who sued would have everyone drink.

      Anyone over 8 years old knows that coffee is hot. Suing because it is is entirely frivolous.

    14. Re:Re-enacting? by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1
      How do you brew coffee at home?

      1) boil water (~100C, ~212F)
      2) pour on instant or ground coffee

      Brew coffee and instant don't belong in the same sentence. I don't drink the stuff and I know that. Also, you don't boil the water, you heat it to 90-95C. Freshly brewed coffee is around 90C, but cools to 80C fairly quickly.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    15. Re:Re-enacting? by back_pages · · Score: 1

      Thank you. I have posted myself how the McDonald's coffee lawsuit is horrendously misunderstood. It's almost embarrassing that someone agreed with my comments by erroneously referring to it.

    16. Re:Re-enacting? by quantum+bit · · Score: 1

      Common sense has been discontinued some years ago, this is simply another sign of common sense becoming increasingly scarce.

      The problem is that the total amount of common sense in the universe is a constant. The population just keeps increasing...

    17. Re:Re-enacting? by InvalidError · · Score: 1

      AFAIK, if you put water in a kettle and only come back once it is singing steady and loud, the water should be boiling near 100C... I usually have more important/useful things to do than waiting after it.

      Automatic brewers (at least the cheap ones) do roughly the same thing but in small increments. Water drips from the tank into a heating chamber with an intake floater valve, is heated up to the boiling point where the chamber's contents gets shot into the ground coffee by the rising pressure and the subsequent drop in chamber pressure draws in the next drip of fresh water along with whatever did not exit the dump pipe. Once the chamber's heating element has reached its cruise temperature, water dripping in boils instantaneously and the process becomes swift and noisy... and sometimes makes a steamy overflow mess when the boil&draw action pumps water faster than it can get through the coffee and filter. These spills were hot enough to ruin the counter's melamine finish. (The heat softened the melamine enough to let gases trapped under it cause large blister-like deformations. The melamine must have been misapplied or the glue improperly mixed/cured.)

    18. Re:Re-enacting? by kurzweilfreak · · Score: 1

      If your kid learned about it after reading Slashdot, can we sue Slashdot for posting the story? Can we sue multiple times for dupes?!

      --

      kurzweil_freak

      5th Kyu Genbukan Ninpo/KJJR student

      Be the darkness that allows the light to shine.

    19. Re:Re-enacting? by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

      I like my coffee hot too, just not hot enough to cause 3rd degree burns on contact.

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    20. Re:Re-enacting? by Thangodin · · Score: 1

      Actually, by the time the water goes through the grounds and settles into the pot, and then into the cup, it has cooled to about 140 F or less. The optimal temperature for coffee is just at the pain threshold, no where near hot enough to cause burns. MacDonald's coffee burns because they superheat it under pressure to above boiling before forcing it through the grounds. They get more coffee out of the beans that way (although it tastes horrible, because they're actually breaking the beans down and adding sediment, rather than leaching the oils out as you're supposed to.)

      The only time I've ever had MacDonald's coffee was when I was forced to while driving a long distance. There was nothing else available. After five minutes left in a freezing car, with the lid removed to cool it down, I took a little sip--and scalded my tongue so badly that I could not taste a thing for three days. My tongue was actually blistered.

      And no, this is not the way coffee is supposed to be served. They do it this way because they're too damn cheap to do it properly.

  4. Anyone else see the irony in this? by gcnaddict · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Doom encourages two high schoolers to go suicidal and massacre kids at a school, and all we hear is a public outcry on why violent games are bad. A kid playing WoW dies and Blizzard gets sued? What's the world coming to?

    --
    Viable Slashdot alternatives: https://pipedot.org/ and http://soylentnews.org/
    1. Re:Anyone else see the irony in this? by xhi · · Score: 1

      Yeh, There is shuch a shit made about p2p downloads driving hollywood out of business. What happens to game developers when lawsuits like these are taken seriously. It would be like suing GM for making a car that you got hurt in while playing chicken. F*** E* A**

    2. Re:Anyone else see the irony in this? by Blackwulf · · Score: 4, Informative

      iD has been sued several times by the victim's families of school shootings. Maybe not for Columbine, but they were sued in connection with the Peducah, KY shootings, along with Sony, Square (for FF7), Activision, and some retailers. Kinda like the Strickland v. Sony lawsuit in Fayette, Alabama, but that's more against GTA than Doom.

    3. Re:Anyone else see the irony in this? by Giant+Robot · · Score: 1

      I see your point but I fail to see the "irony"

    4. Re:Anyone else see the irony in this? by NetRAVEN5000 · · Score: 1

      For anyone else who doesn't know what "playing chicken" is I did a Google search and it's a game played in an old movie "The Program" in which some characters play a game where they lie down in the middle of the highway.

    5. Re:Anyone else see the irony in this? by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      Playing chicken is where you are both in cars (or motorbikes) and head towards each other at high speed. The first to swerve out of the way is 'chicken'. It's a fast way to get killed...

      Lying down in the highway is not true chicken, since only one side is risking their life (so you couldn't determine who the chicken was).

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Game_of_chicken

    6. Re:Anyone else see the irony in this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The usual meaning is that two people drive straight at each other; whoever turns away loses. Though sometimes neither person turns away...

    7. Re:Anyone else see the irony in this? by NetRAVEN5000 · · Score: 1
      "Lying down in the highway is not true chicken, since only one side is risking their life (so you couldn't determine who the chicken was)."

      Well the way I understand it you do it with other people and take turns lying in the highway.

    8. Re:Anyone else see the irony in this? by ModernGeek · · Score: 1

      That's West Paducah, thank you very much. I went to high school at heath high. When people ask where I'm from, I tell them I went to the school where a bunch of kids got shot. Everyone in the town jokes around about it, as it is what we are nationally known for. I see the paralyzed girl all the time, she is filthy rich because of it. The families of the dead are even richer.

      --
      Sig: I stole this sig.
    9. Re:Anyone else see the irony in this? by FluffyG · · Score: 1

      .... Square (for FF7), .....

      yeah i'd be pissed too if i got into a fight with a kid and he didnt let me take my turn to heal myself

  5. That Game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After ruining my brother's and my friend's life and careers, I knew this game would be the end of civilization.

    But what good does suiing do? He's already dead!
    You shouldn't have spoiled your son with a $15 a month game anyway.
    Serves them right.

    1. Re:That Game by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Some people are opportunistic enough to want to cash in on their son's death

    2. Re:That Game by pipingguy · · Score: 1


      Sometimes people are so blinded by grief that they fall into the "I won't let this happen to anyone else no matter what it takes" mindset.

      It must be horrible to lose a child and then realize that it was partially due to one's own fault. It's probably enough to cause some parents to try to punish the rest of the world/go on a crusade (often egged-on by special interest groups) rather than deal with their own feelings of guilt.

  6. Darwinism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Or is it Intelligent Design?

    You be the judge.

    1. Re:Darwinism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This comment wins the thread. Brilliant, sir! (Or madam.)

    2. Re:Darwinism? by Metteyya · · Score: 1

      This comment made my day. Such gems are worth reading /. comments for! :)

    3. Re:Darwinism? by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      If the suit is successful and Blizzard is pulled from the shelves, then Darwin was wrong. Even those unfit will still survive, or at least have to try to find another way to kill themselves before reaching reproductive age.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    4. Re:Darwinism? by nihaopaul · · Score: 1

      all i know is he needs to be nominated: www.darwinawards.com

      he probably slipped but point proven he wasn't the smartest cookie in the jar

      shit i'm going to go jump off a train because slashdot users are EVAL(with a capital I), and as a result my family members will sue slashdot for my death!

    5. Re:Darwinism? by MooUK · · Score: 1

      Clearly, whatever intelligence designed us left out the intelligence in many of us.

    6. Re:Darwinism? by wormbin · · Score: 2, Funny

      How can think that?

      It's obvious that this is the result of His Noodly Appendage.

    7. Re:Darwinism? by GraphicNature · · Score: 1

      I vote for natural selection.

      --
      So long, and thanks for all the fish.
    8. Re:Darwinism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think The Creator believes in stupidity too.

    9. Re:Darwinism? by jcr · · Score: 1

      Well, intelligence can certainly be ruled out.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    10. Re:Darwinism? by sik0fewl · · Score: 2, Funny

      Whatever it is, it seems to be working.

      --
      I remember when legal used to mean lawful, now it means some kind of loophole. - Leo Kessler
    11. Re:Darwinism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      whether it is intelligent design or darwinism depends on whether blizzard meant to produce a product with the ability to kill stupid people. I think we need further investigation into their intent before we can judge.

    12. Re:Darwinism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In some parts of China, 13 is reproductive age.

  7. There's your answer right there by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 0, Redundant
    "saying their son jumped to his death while reenacting a scene from the game..."

    It is tragic what happened to the parents, but obviously this game did not cause the boy's death. As we know there are no scenes in the game (to speak of), it is all open-ended. But they don't know how to explain themselves, ergo we are presented with slightly nonsensical statements like this. That sentence was written by a lawyer, I'd bet.

    --
    If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
  8. safety warnings by ilf · · Score: 5, Interesting

    maybe they should jump on the bandwagon and print safety labels on game boxes, like they put on coffee cups (hot coffe in your lap whilke driving = bad) and microwaves (don't dry your cat in them)!

    or they just listened to him: http://www.bash.org/?4753

    1. Re:safety warnings by Zenmonkeycat · · Score: 1

      Caution: Certain points in the game may be so awesome that you totally have to see if you can fly out of your window, because that would be crazy!

      --

      *****
      Dear Mary,
      I yearn for you tragically,
      A.T. Tappman, Chaplain, U.S. Army.

    2. Re:safety warnings by prichardson · · Score: 5, Informative

      I really want to clear this up because the likes of Jay Leno have really twisted the story.

      The McDonalds in question had repeated complaints about the temperature of their coffee, and the woman burned wasn't just burned a little. She recieved third degree burns on her thighs. They knew their coffee was too hot and they didn't do anything about it.

      --
      Help I'm a rock.
    3. Re:safety warnings by Sarisar · · Score: 1

      Didn't Superman capes have a note on them stating that the cape did not allow the wearer to fly? And there was some ready meal that had a warning about "Caution: Product will be hot after heating". And starbucks have "The drink you're about to enjoy is extremely hot" although I would disagree with the 'enjoy' bit myself. Wonder if I can sue them for it.

      I did have a quick look for links but couldn't find any apart from other people saying it, and I'm meant to be packing as I'm flying to the US tomorrow so I really shouldn't be reading Slashdot. Wish me luck going through the customs though please :)

    4. Re:safety warnings by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      How about a safety warning label that is always floating two feet in front of every man, woman, and child that reads...

      Warning, everything you interact with CAN KILL you.

      Let preempt stupidity to avoid lawsuits. Better yet, lets give everyone a gun and tell them point it at their heads and pull the trigger. That way, only the smart will survive.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    5. Re:safety warnings by TubeSteak · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I recall reading a recent story about a kid who died from a video game induced seizure. He had a condition which made him sensitive to bright flashy lights.

      The condition got worse over a period of months the more he played console video games. His mother says she knew he was having these seizures but didn't know what was causing them.

      After he died, she learned that there was a warning/disclaimer in small print stating that the game could cause seizures.

      Another situation where someone didn't read the fine print and it tragically bit them in the ass. The article quoted the mother saying that fine print should be more noticeable. /offtopic: A girl I know had one of her kittens sneak into the dryer before it got turned on.

      She heard the kitten & turned off the dryer, but it eventually died. No warning labels could have prevented what happened.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    6. Re:safety warnings by Pofy · · Score: 1

      >maybe they should jump on the bandwagon and print safety labels on game boxes, like they put on coffee
      >cups (hot coffe in your lap whilke driving = bad) and microwaves (don't dry your cat in them)!

      You expect people that do such things to be smart enough to read such labels to start with??

    7. Re:safety warnings by Pofy · · Score: 1

      Gee, how can coffee be "too hot"??? Coffee is supposed to have bolied water (or close to it), it can't get hotter than that. it is supposed to be hot!! Doesn't matter if it is some degerees hotter or cooler, you get burned by it, it is supposed to be that way. if it was not hot, THEN I would comply!!!

    8. Re:safety warnings by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      The condition got worse over a period of months the more he played console video games. His mother says she knew he was having these seizures but didn't know what was causing them.

      any more details? sounds like either she was two incompetant to take him to a doctor about them or the doctor was too incompetent to suggest that video games might be the cause.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    9. Re:safety warnings by Surt · · Score: 4, Funny

      I don't understand. I've never had a problem drying cats in the microwave.

      My favorite recipe for dried cat:
      1 40 oz cat.
      1/2 oz orange peel.
      1/4 cup mustard.

      Shave the cat if not purchased pre-shaved or hairless. Wash cat in disenfectant soap and warm water (warning, many cats do not like water and may become agitated).

      Coat cat liberally in mustard, then garnish with orange peel. Dry on low power in microwave for about 50 minutes at 300 watt power (check your microwave manual, microwave power will vary). Dry for additional 10 minutes if cat is still moist or squishy to the touch.

      Dice and serve in a bowl or party tray.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    10. Re:safety warnings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it can be "too hot." 3rd degree burns?

    11. Re:safety warnings by ameoba · · Score: 1

      They just recently added Parental Controls to the game.

      Personally, I wouldn't mind in the least if there were no minors in the game world at all.

      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
    12. Re:safety warnings by LordNimon · · Score: 1
      First of all, it's quite possible to brew coffee without heat. This is how I brew my coffee. It's more convenient and much tastier than instant coffee.

      Second, even if you brew your coffee with boiling water, you're not supposed to serve it that way. Only a moron would think that giving a cup of boiling water to a person in a car is a good idea.

      You might say that I should expect McDonalds to serve my coffee that hot, because that's what they've been doing. I disagree. It is not reasonable to expect a restaurant to serve me boiling hot coffee, especially if I'm in a car. Like another poster said, McDonalds' coffee was 40 degrees hotter than other restaurants' coffee.

      --
      And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
      To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    13. Re:safety warnings by d34thm0nk3y · · Score: 1

      After he died, she learned that there was a warning/disclaimer in small print stating that the game could cause seizures.

      If by small you mean the entire inside cover of every video game made in the US since the NES days...

    14. Re:safety warnings by NetRAVEN5000 · · Score: 1
      "she knew he was having these seizures but didn't know what was causing them."

      "The condition got worse over a period of months the more he played console video games."

      So let me get this straight - she noticed that the condition worsened as he played video games more often, yet she still didn't draw a connection between the two?

      If you ask me, that's like saying "The more I crush my hand in the door, the more my hand hurts - I wonder why."

      And also, I don't play video games much and certainly don't read the "fine print" - but somehow I still knew about photosensitive seizures - which really have little to do with video games in specific, they can also be caused by watching TV, strobe lights, or even simple card games. The only thing is that kids play video games for hours and hours, unlike other activities that can cause photosensitive seizures. What, do they have to put a warning for every TV show you watch, or for every deck of cards you buy?

      You take a risk whenever you do ANYTHING - typing takes the risk of carpal tunnel, cooking takes the risk of burning yourself, going to work takes the risk that something bad will happen to you at work, using Krazy glue takes the risk of gluing your fingers together.

    15. Re:safety warnings by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      You might not, but *everyone else* makes coffee with boiling water.

      Before you add the milk it is going to be pretty close to boiling. Every child knows that (some even found out the hard way). That the woman who sued didn't know that shows the mentality.

      I wouldn't buy coffee if it was 40 degrees cooler than standard coffee. I don't want my coffee lukewarm.

    16. Re:safety warnings by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      But then how would you get metals for crafting?

      Oh, wait...

    17. Re:safety warnings by incrhlk · · Score: 1

      duncan donuts is now getting sued for the same thing, but their coffee has a very clear label on it" Warning: Hot Coffee".
      the lawyer contents the label does state clearly how hot the coffee is, is it "hot", "extremely hot" or "This coffee is so hot it'll melt your skin off, enjoy!"

      --
      "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch.Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote."
    18. Re:safety warnings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What kind of sickie mods this as 5 funny?

      As someone violently allergic to mustard, I don't find this funny at all.

    19. Re:safety warnings by geminidomino · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't play video games much and certainly don't read the "fine print"

      If you've ever played a Nintendo GCN or DS game, that "fine print" is a huge splash screen shown on loading.

    20. Re:safety warnings by Bleck · · Score: 1

      See, you *say* drying a cat in a microwave is easy, but that's just because you've never had cat dried in the traditional smokehouse way. Trust me, while microwave-dried cat may be okay for a quick get-together, if you're worried about impressing your fiance's parents, you don't want your father-in-law-to-be choking on an overly-chewy bit of cat!

    21. Re:safety warnings by Busy · · Score: 1

      IIRC the only reason it even ended up in court was because McD didn't want to help with her hospital bill for the injury. Originally, that's all she was asking from them, and they gave her a really hard time about it.

      --
      Think of someone with average intelligence. Now think 1/2 the world is dumber than that guy.
    22. Re:safety warnings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about a safety warning label that is always floating two feet in front of every man, woman, and child that reads...

      Warning, everything you interact with CAN KILL you.


      I am with you here, as long as this warning can be permanently switched off for non-US-citizens.

  9. Good luck with that one by kypper · · Score: 1

    Columbine featured kids strolling into school and opening fire almost exactly as Neo did in the elevator scene in the Matrix.

    Didn't get that movie off the shelves.

    1. Re:Good luck with that one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um.. The Matrix came after the columbine shooting.

    2. Re:Good luck with that one by kypper · · Score: 2, Funny

      Matrix Release Date: 31 March 1999
      Columbine: April 20, 1999
      Parental Blame: Dateless.

    3. Re:Good luck with that one by Bootvis · · Score: 1

      They probably leeched the matrix from the internet before it appeared in cinema's Sue Bram Cohen!

      --
      Read, refresh, repeat.
    4. Re:Good luck with that one by Greg01851 · · Score: 1

      In the Elevator scene, the guards were shooting back... dont recall hearing about any other students or teachers shooting back in Columbine.

    5. Re:Good luck with that one by fwitness · · Score: 4, Insightful

      At first I wanted to state that Columbine happened way before "The Matrix". Upon further cursory inspection, it looks like the Columbine massacre happened less than a month after the theatrical release of "The Matrix". I never realized how close these two events really were. Interesting.

      --
      -- I have fans? Wow.
    6. Re:Good luck with that one by ikkonoishi · · Score: 1

      See. If carrying a firearm to class was mandatory we wouldn't have this problem.

    7. Re:Good luck with that one by Mahou · · Score: 1

      games and movies didn't teach them anything. the columbine kids were either total n00bs or campers. imagine going on a map in an fps with a friend, filled with about 300 unarmed bots that were for the most part stationary. after three hours with automatic rifles, pistols, some small explosives and free reign, you manage to kill less than 20. you would probably uninstall the game and punch yourself in the face right? yeh me too

      --
      if i'm not immortal, what's the point of living?
      ...te?
    8. Re:Good luck with that one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the case of The Matrix, the Wachowski did not educate, cause the education, or allow the education of the kids in the use of firearms. In the case of the video game, the game did not provide the opportunity for the kid to jump. In both cases, it was the parents that provided the means and opportunity, if not the motives. I am not saying parents are to blame, as parents can only do so much. But if one trains a kid to use lethal force, or happen to live in a tall building, and then do not also train them not to do stupid things, certain conclusions are unavoidable. It is popular to believe that kids play the game, then go out and buy a gun and massecre a school with no previous experience in using lethal force. Thes people also believe the chewbacca defense.

    9. Re:Good luck with that one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that they had planned it for months -- much longer than the 3 weeks between the movie release and when they did it; and they already wore trenchcoats.

      OMG, but maybe they haXXored a scr33n3r from Down Under! Damn P2P in '98... '99...

    10. Re:Good luck with that one by Jeremi · · Score: 1
      See. If carrying a firearm to class was mandatory we wouldn't have this problem.


      Heh. Let's pack the high schools with horny, quarreling, embittered, hormone-soaked teenagers, all packing heat. What could possibly go wrong?

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    11. Re:Good luck with that one by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      Columbine featured kids strolling into school and opening fire almost exactly as Neo did in the elevator scene in the Matrix.

      They were summersaulting and running up on walls while being shot at by a dozen heavily armed SWAT guys?

      No? Oh, you meant, they were wearing trenchcoats, like they'd been doig for years, and that movie ALSO had the trendy coats. I see.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    12. Re:Good luck with that one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I never looked too hard into the details surrounding Colubmine, but wasn't it something that had been planned for quite some time, that is, something that had been more than a month in planning? I'm curious how much a role "The Matrix" actually played in their plans. It's not like they needed to see a movie to get the idea of shooting people to death.

    13. Re:Good luck with that one by Xyrus · · Score: 1

      And did you happen to notice the lack of pirates and dinosaurs at the time.

      I think more is at work here. :P

      ~X~

      --
      ~X~
    14. Re:Good luck with that one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh... good point. better give the teachers body armor.

    15. Re:Good luck with that one by fwitness · · Score: 1

      Good point. I remember in my high school daze we had a bunch of trench-coated always-wear-black goths. Of course there is much more hear than the sound bytes you hear on the news. Apparenty there had been a website documenting the depths of one of the boys problems since at least '97. I am not in any way saying that these things caused the incident, I just never put it all together noticed how close these things were in time.

      He could have shot up the school with ray-bans on and beckoning "Mr. Smith" to come fight him, I'd still say the problem was that the kid was screwed up. If movies and games can effect you like that, it's not the movies and the games that are the problem.

      --
      -- I have fans? Wow.
    16. Re:Good luck with that one by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      I never realized how close these two events really were. Interesting.

      Not really. Beavis and butthead had been planning a massacre for quite some time, to the point that they were reported to the local sheriff's office months before the shooting, which took place on Hitler's birthday. Also, I don't recall any propane bombs in the Matrix, but they had some at columbine.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    17. Re:Good luck with that one by blincoln · · Score: 2, Informative

      Didn't get that movie off the shelves.

      Probably because The Basketball Diaries has a scene that's much closer to the reality (including the trenchcoat and heavy boots), and came out in 1995.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    18. Re:Good luck with that one by mkw87 · · Score: 1

      It also happened days after President Clinton sent troops into Kosovo.... =/

      --
      Arguing with an engineer is like wrestling a pig in mud. Soon, you realize the pig is dirty, and he likes it.
  10. On an Up Note ... by ebooher · · Score: 1

    I'm absolutely cheering to hear that it isn't just U.S. parents that no longer take any concern into the well being of their children. For a while I thought we had the "The Government should Watch My Kids for Me so I can Drink All I Want." wrapped up with a pretty blue bow.

    --
    "Genius may shine aloof and alone, like a star, but goodness is social, and it takes two men and God to make a Brother."
  11. a good introduction on such tort law problems by Diego+and+Aline · · Score: 3, Informative

    ... can be found at the Becker-Posner blog here. Gary Becker is a Nobel prize winner economist and Richard Posner is, I presume, an equally important lawyer.

    It would be nice if we could get hold of the existing arguments and proposed solutions before jumping into naïve comments, fuck-the-corporations shouting and suchlike.

    --
    All determinations of time presuppose something permanent in perception and that this permanent cannot be in the self, s
    1. Re:a good introduction on such tort law problems by jo7hs2 · · Score: 1

      My Contracts professor worships Posner, and has referred us to this blog. Posner was a federal judge and teaches now at University of Chicago. These boys, while a tad heartless (and a lot loony at times) have some really really interesting ideas about economics and law. Torts just happens to be the most bastardized area of law... Contracts is one of the most pure, so you can imagine how little my prof thinks of Tort law.

    2. Re:a good introduction on such tort law problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The costs of malpractice premiums are only about 1 percent of total U.S. health-care costs. Moreover, insofar as physicians are forced to swallow the cost of the premiums rather than being able to pass them on to their patients or their patients' insurers in the form of higher prices, the premiums do not actually increase total health-care costs.

      WTF?

    3. Re:a good introduction on such tort law problems by ThousandStars · · Score: 1
      Gary Becker is a Nobel prize winner economist and Richard Posner is, I presume, an equally important lawyer.

      Richard Posner is actually a judge these days, and, IIRC, a member of the faculty at a pretty big deal law school (University of Chicago?). He's also written numerous books on topics that range from the law to sex to the failure of U.S. intelligence agencies to predict the 9/11 attacks. Sometimes he also writes book reviews for various publications, including the New York Times Book Review.

    4. Re:a good introduction on such tort law problems by Diego+and+Aline · · Score: 1

      Well, yeah. Gary Becker wouldn't co-write a blog with Joseph Sixpackus. As I said, I presume the guy is good.

      --
      All determinations of time presuppose something permanent in perception and that this permanent cannot be in the self, s
  12. Jack cries out "AH HA! SEE?!!!" by saskboy · · Score: 1, Interesting

    http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/11/20/142320 1&threshold=-1&tid=95

    Our lawyer friend Jack from the USA would use this case in China as "proof" that video games are killing children. The sad truth is that some children are incapable of distinguishing fantasy from reality, and should not be playing video games. Darwin's theory takes over if they see something they shouldn't be doing, because whatever is wrong with their brain takes over and puts fiction to life. The results are enough to stir up other kooks like Jack Thompson.

    Ban parents who buy video games for mentally challenged children! Don't ban video games!

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    1. Re:Jack cries out "AH HA! SEE?!!!" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If we're lucky China will ban WoW, and that loss of business will make WoW collapse and fail. Ahhh that would be nice, to stop hearing about it from all the addicts.

      But eh, there are plenty of addictive things in life that can make you suicidal. The problem is the people, not the game I should agree.

    2. Re:Jack cries out "AH HA! SEE?!!!" by TooMuchEspressoGuy · · Score: 1
      I think what's more likely here was the following scenario:

      Parents: "Oh, no! Our child jumped to his death!"

      Lawyer: "Let's find someone we can sue!"

      Parents: "Well, our son played a lot of this game called 'World of Warcraft.'"

      Lawyer: "Can you jump to your death in that game?"

      Parents: "I think so..."

      Lawyer: "A HA! So, *obviously,* your son jumped to his death while re-enacting a scene from a video game! Now, let's go sue the maker of this game."

      --
      Many Bothans died to bring you this sig.
    3. Re:Jack cries out "AH HA! SEE?!!!" by saskboy · · Score: 1

      That seems quite likely. It's not like you can ask a dead child why they jumped off a tall place to their death. Unless the kid said something like, "I'm going to go jump from a high place to reenact a video game called WoW," it's pretty hard to determine the impetus of his mental instability.

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    4. Re:Jack cries out "AH HA! SEE?!!!" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If we're lucky China will ban WoW and the fucking gold farmers will... well they'll all be Korean instead. But it was a nice thought while it lasted.

  13. Lawsuit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I am not a lawayer, but wouldn't they need to prove that Blizzard was reckless in the creation of the video game somehow?

    1. Re:Lawsuit by Smallpond · · Score: 1

      They already have proof of guilt:

      "China's online game market brought in $580 million this year"

      that's good enough proof for any lawyer to jump at the case.

    2. Re:Lawsuit by Clowning · · Score: 1

      The term usually used in these contexts is "negligence." Typically, the plaintiff in a negligence action will have to show that:
      (1) the plaintiff suffered a cognizable injury (death is generally pretty cognizable in the eyes of the law)
      (2) the defendant owed the plaintiff a duty of care (to reasonably design the video game)
      (3) the defendant breached that duty (they didn't reasonably design the game)
      (4) the defendant's breach proximately caused the plaintiff's injury (this is understandably the toughest element)

      Legal scholarship is fully of brilliant and inventive characterizations of the subtle interplay between duty and proximate cause. Unfortunately, this subtlety makes juries especially susceptible to emotional persuasion, thus opening the door for opportunistic plaintiffs' lawyers to wring money out of deep-pocket defendants. Teary-eyed relatives on the witness stand can really tip the scales in favor of the plaintiffs, even where the case is on very questionable legal ground.

  14. awesome by everphilski · · Score: 3, Funny

    Anything that has a chance of bringing the wayward children back to Everquest is gold in my book -_-

    -everphilski-

  15. Stupid kid by garylian · · Score: 5, Funny

    Why didn't he cast invulnerability, like the other kid that jumped? Oh, he was only a warrior? What a moron!

    These kids today... They just don't read the game manual and class abilities in game.

    Maybe it was a Chinese translation error?

    1. Re:Stupid kid by Rihahn · · Score: 1

      Ehh, they nerfed the 'invulnerability absorbing jumping damage' thing back in 1.4. This is why you should always make sure you read the patch notes before doing anything rash.

    2. Re:Stupid kid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he was a warrior he could have just switched to defensive stance before hitting the ground. Everyone knows that fall damage can only do a maximum of 100% of your health in damage, and defensive stance reduces all damage taken by 10%!

      That kid was such a newby.

    3. Re:Stupid kid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A priest cast Power Word: Shield on him before he jumped. Unfortunately, neither of them knew Blizzard prevented shields from absorbing fall damage a few patches back. If either of them still played WoW, the kid would still be alive today.

    4. Re:Stupid kid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forget that, if he was a mage he could have cast slow fall. Maybe he was missing the light feathers you need as a reagent.

      Then again the real world sucks.

    5. Re:Stupid kid by symphara · · Score: 1

      Duh... didn't you read the patch notes? Shielding/invulnerability no longer protects you from environmental damage!

    6. Re:Stupid kid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jumping from on high kills you in the game too.

      Perhaps he just expected to take the 10 min rez sickness and 75% durability loss, then go inside for some power rangers and a cheese sandwich.

  16. What seen did he act out?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not aware of any 'scenes' where you jump to your death.

  17. perhaps.... by Aurisor · · Score: 1

    Perhaps he didn't get his Divine Shield off in time? http://www.thottbot.com/?sp=642 Stupid paladin...

    1. Re:perhaps.... by SnoopJeDi · · Score: 1

      I think you mean Slow fall (Stupid Mage)

  18. "Unintelligent Design?" by Shoten · · Score: 3, Funny

    Okay...so a 13-year-old kid plays a video game where there's magic, all kinds of non-real species and objects, all of which transpires on a place that isn't real. And from this, he develops some notion that he can fly, or survive jumps from very high up, or some other physics-ignorant notion. And some people believe that somehow, in some fashion, Blizzard is responsible?

    All I have to ask is this: have the evangelical Christians been much more effective at discounting the theory of evolution in China than they have here? Kind of sounds like it...

    --

    For your security, this post has been encrypted with ROT-13, twice.
    1. Re:"Unintelligent Design?" by TCQuad · · Score: 1

      All I have to ask is this: have the evangelical Christians been much more effective at discounting the theory of evolution in China than they have here? Kind of sounds like it...

      No, but it sounds like they're finding traction discounting the theory of gravity.

    2. Re:"Unintelligent Design?" by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      http://www.joystiq.com/entry/1234000997068547/

      Just pointing out that joystiq is saying the kid died last year. /this is why i read more than one article on any given topic

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
  19. Mario bros. by El_Muerte_TDS · · Score: 4, Funny

    Please raise your hand if you ever tried to smash a brick wall reenacting a scene from Mario Bros.

    Dumbass!

    1. Re:Mario bros. by jcorno · · Score: 5, Funny

      Please raise your hand if you ever tried to smash a brick wall reenacting a scene from Mario Bros.

      It left me paralyzed from the neck down, you insensitive clod.

    2. Re:Mario bros. by Dark_Lord_Prime · · Score: 1

      But... but.. those bricks are where the best gold coins are hidden!! ...nevermind the Magic Mushrooms and Fire Flowers!!

    3. Re:Mario bros. by ziggamon2.0 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, if this insensitive clod joke was modded informative, I can see why these people may actually have a case...

    4. Re:Mario bros. by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      It was modded "informative" because the parent was making a point that anything and everything these days can get you sued regardless how silly the motive is. Sad, but true.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    5. Re:Mario bros. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
      Please raise your hand if you ever tried to smash a brick wall reenacting a scene from Mario Bros.

      I sure did. I also:
      • tried jumping on my pet turtle and kick it after that to make in bounce from walls (RIP Leroy the Turtle).
      • tried to push myself through the kitchen sink to get into the sever system (Flushed toilets almost worked.).
      • tried to bang my head to the ceiling to find out if it would throw me some golden coins (I'm still working on this one. No coins found YET!).
      • tried to get super powers by eating red mushrooms (You need Superman's kidney for this to work.).

      But none of these has worked sofar. As a result I'm about to sue Nintendo, but the guys with the white jackets told me it wouldn't be possible unless I ate my pills.
    6. Re:Mario bros. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once, I tried to fucking kill a turtle by jumping on it...

    7. Re:Mario bros. by zippthorne · · Score: 4, Informative

      You're supposed to punch while you jump. Not even Mario broke bricks with his *head*.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    8. Re:Mario bros. by OS24Ever · · Score: 1

      i spit fire once after eating a habenero off a fire flower

      --

      As a rock-in-roll Physicist once said, No matter where you go, there you are.

    9. Re:Mario bros. by Surt · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised the mushrooms didn't work for you, I suspect maybe you didn't get the right kind.
      Also, the coins from the ceiling strategy is likely to work eventually, as a lot of people have hidden money in their ceilings or attics over the years.
      You can definitely get into the sewer system through your drains, if you have a wide enough drain. Try the drain in a pool.
      Sorry about your turtle, it worked for me!

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    10. Re:Mario bros. by Winckle · · Score: 1, Troll

      3, Informative!
      Mods on Crack!

    11. Re:Mario bros. by appleprophet · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not if he's crouching while you jump or if he's holding something.

    12. Re:Mario bros. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was modded "informative" because the parent was making a point that anything and everything these days can get you sued regardless how silly the motive is. Sad, but true.

      But in that case it should be insightful, not informative.

    13. Re:Mario bros. by dkf · · Score: 1
      Not even Mario broke bricks with his *head*.
      Yeah, that's Motörhead fans.
      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    14. Re:Mario bros. by moosesocks · · Score: 1

      You're supposed to punch while you jump. Not even Mario broke bricks with his *head*. (Score: 5, Informative)

      MODS ON CRACK! Are you out of your minds???

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
  20. Natural Selection by kenmac · · Score: 1

    Natural Selection is still hard at work!

    1. Re:Natural Selection by Shiriki · · Score: 1

      Oh yes and currently porting to HL2 http://www.unknownworlds.com/

  21. A time bomb for the game industry? by DingerX · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We sit here and ridicule the notion that a video game could sap someone's free will and make them do something as patently absurd as commit suicide. Okay, probably this is a case that's bound to be lost.

    But this is an industry where addiction is a major problem. Some video gamers are showing the signs of clinical addiction. These things are making people sick, and what do marketing and design people do? They try to make them more addictive, of course.

    Heck, your whole MMORPG industry is built on the concept of "levelling", which some smart lawyer is sooner or later gonna figure out is nothing other than intermittent behavioral reinforcement. Then they'll find that the games like that have whole "support" industries of addicts encouraging others in their addiction.

    Snicker, call me a troll, but take a look at the tobacco industry for a second.

    Better make it a few minutes -- I'm gonna finish this level before continuing my rant.

    1. Re:A time bomb for the game industry? by tomstdenis · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't buy it [literally and figuratively]. I have made stupid choices in my life [e.g. buying video games over the net when I really shouldn't have] but I know when to quit. I pull myself away from it and do something else.

      These kids getting super addicted to WoW and other RPGs are just kids who don't have proper perspective on life. They place an over abundance of importance and value in the games when personal and professional development is more important.

      For instance, I don't spend all day on slashdot or gaming because I have projects to work on that help pay the rent, buy food, get invites to conferences, etc. I realize that thre are MORE IMPORTANT things than gaming.

      For young kids I totally blame the parents. It's really quite simple. Unplug the computer, lock up the HD, etc. If an 8 yr old kid can run around buying computer parts that you locked up you're giving your kids too much money or you should teach them stealing is wrong. When I was a young kid my parents would just put the NES away when I had other things to do [homework, piano, cubs/scouts, etc]. I don't view them as evil or mean for it and I look back and say "thanks for helping me balance my life".

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    2. Re:A time bomb for the game industry? by back_pages · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Yeah, you're absolutely right, but how the hell does selling an addictive product make you liable? Is the porn industry liable for destroying (or saving) marriages? What about the makers of Battletech or Dungeons & Dragons? What about Gold's Gym or Weider, both of whom sell weight lifting equipment which leads to addictive chemical reactions in your body?

      Perhaps my 2nd grade orchestra teacher is liable for my addiction to playing musical instruments? I can't even get the damn thoughts out of my head - whether I'm at work, at home watching TV, or suddenly awake in the middle of the night, I am constantly thinking (usually way in the back of my mind) about music and playing music. Oh the mental anguish!

      I'm not disagreeing with your premise about these games. They are addictive. One in particular had a hold of me for several years, but I finally shook it. However, I can't fathom how people can hold the makers of these things liable for a person's irresponsible addictive behavior. What are they supposed to do? Produce a successful product, but not too successful? It reminds me of the medieval Catholic church decree that it was sinful to make too much profit. (Was it 10%?) Any profits you make over that must be turned over to the church, else you're going straight to hell. Is that what we're suggesting with video games and cigarettes? Why not oil companies, tv shows, and professional athletes/sports teams?

      These lawsuits might be successful on an individual scale where specific facts can be considered, but in the broader scheme of things, they're preposterous. If I were a game developer, I would specifically design my online games that require a monthly subscription fee to be as addictive as possible.

    3. Re:A time bomb for the game industry? by meisenst · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have played World of Warcraft, Everquest, and text MMORPGs (well, MUDs) for many, many years. Before this, I was a D&D fan, and other such games.

      Never, ever, have I tried to anything this absurd as a result of my experiences in these games.

      This is NOT the fault of the game or the company that brought into being. This does not have anything to do with the fact that these kinds of games support the idea of behavioural reinforcement (which I agree with entirely). This was the case of a child that did something that he should not have done. Where were his parents?

      When I was very young, I burned myself on the furnace. I learned what "hot" was. Who neglected to teach this child that he could not fly? And, in any case, how does this differ from the whole "kid jumps off roof because he thought he could fly" thing? I'm fairly sure that that wasn't a MMORPG (or gaming in general) problem either. Perhaps we should sue Superman?

      --
      Green's Law of Debate: Anything is possible if you don't know what you're talking about.
    4. Re:A time bomb for the game industry? by iamwahoo2 · · Score: 1

      Your comparing addiction to dangerous chemicals to entertainment media. I think they are on two completely different levels in terms of danger to a person. If a video game can make someone delusional then the same could be said for TV, music, or a book which have all been criticized in the past under similar circumstances.

    5. Re:A time bomb for the game industry? by DingerX · · Score: 1

      Bah, the medieval catholic church wasn't nearly that bad. The problem was faulty economic theory (money is dead, it doesn't grow, therefore there shouldn't be interest); and yet in the Middle Ages there were many good Catholics who made livings as merchants (selling goods for more than they paid for them), and bankers.

      The disanalogy between all your other examples and video games is that none of the industries behind them design their products specifically to be addictive, none market them as addiction-causing, and none explicitly support groups of addicts to encourage and to further their addiction.

    6. Re:A time bomb for the game industry? by back_pages · · Score: 1
      The disanalogy between all your other examples and video games is that none of the industries behind them design their products specifically to be addictive, none market them as addiction-causing, and none explicitly support groups of addicts to encourage and to further their addiction.

      Without surrendering the other points, I would argue that the body-building industry is specifically focused on the addictive nature of lifting. "Feeling the burn" is a key aspect of a successful workout and the same feeling triggers all sorts of chemical changes in your body. It is addictive. They sell products targeted specifically at getting you and your workout to that reward point faster and longer.

      Yes, the analogy to the church was very fast and loose, but if these industries are liable for the success of their products, there are indeed similarities.

    7. Re:A time bomb for the game industry? by Ernesto+Alvarez · · Score: 1

      That's not clinical addiction, that's more like stupidity and failure to distinguish reality from fantasy.

      Signs of addiction would be increased use of games, and maybe you would be right if this was a death because of lack of sleep or other physiological problems due to game abuse.

      Deliberately jumping to one's death is just a candidate for a darwin award.

    8. Re:A time bomb for the game industry? by TubeSteak · · Score: 1
      http://www.1up.com/do/previewPage?cId=3145772&did= 1

      Reminds me of an article I read a day or two ago about Dead or Alive 4 & how they've included a character and stage from Halo 2.

      The quote I was looking for is on the last page:
      1UP: Seeing this stage actually makes me want to go back and play Halo 2 some more.

      TI: I think so too. Seeing that kind of stimulates you and makes you want to play. But just having these objects, vehicles and things in the stage gives you a lot more depth to the experience.

      TI = Tomonobu Itagaki = lead designer

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    9. Re:A time bomb for the game industry? by jeffasselin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There is a difference between selling physiologically addictive products that will kill you and slightly psychologically additive entertainment.

      --
      If he explores all forms and substances Straight homeward to their symbol-essences; He shall not die.
    10. Re:A time bomb for the game industry? by Surt · · Score: 1

      Professional development for kids in china pretty much means learning to glue shoes faster. I'm sure at the end of their life they'll look back with regret and say: I wish I'd glued more shoes instead of playing all those games!

      Which is a short way to say: some times there's nothing better than games available to you in life.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    11. Re:A time bomb for the game industry? by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      Could that possibly be because there are a billion people on such a small nation? I'm sorry if this sounds callous but really maybe the population is a "bit" out of hand? Maybe there just aren't jobs for 6 billion people?

      Well that and we keep exploiting them for cheap labour. Part of offloading labour to cheap markets means we don't invent new ways to do things. I'm sure machines could make shoes in an automated fashion. It's just cheaper to ruin someone elses life instead of investing in the robotics...

      Besides that we don't need stinking asians. We got mexicans who can clean our floors for us already :-) YEAH WORLD!

      hahaha

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    12. Re:A time bomb for the game industry? by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      "These kids getting super addicted to WoW and other RPGs are just kids who don't have proper perspective on life. They place an over abundance of importance and value in the games when personal and professional development is more important."

      You know, I've really started to wonder about this. As society and technology progress, who are you to say which values and aspects of life are more important. We already have an entire generation who can see just as much importance in something virtual as something they can touch and feel, what if this is some form of personal development for them? And lets not forget that some people have made a LOT of money from MMORPG economies.

      Perhaps what you meant to say is that these people place an over abundance of importance and value in games when personal and professional development is more important TO YOU.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    13. Re:A time bomb for the game industry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So how many MORE stories do we need about MMORPGs destroying people's lives before you'll accept that, just maybe, something should be done about them?

    14. Re:A time bomb for the game industry? by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      No, you're totally wrong.

      You say "some people have made a lot of monies from MMORPG" but compare that to the # of mechanics, doctors, engineers, software developers, musicians, teachers, etc out there. The 5 people ON EARTH making money at it doesn't compare.

      It's also not a productive industry. What does "sword of elf-fiend +5" get me in the real world? Can I use it to email across the world? Can I eat it? Does it give me warmth? Does it fill any of my maslow needs? Being "really good at WoW" is not something ANYONE will pay you for. Nor is it a talent you can really bring into the world on your own.

      I spent a lot of time teaching myself to develop software. Some may say I spent too much time at the computer [perhaps true] but look at me now. I'm supporting myself fresh out of college with a good paying job. I make things that people use to be productive.

      If you think playing WoW is more important than learning a trade or skill, meeting people in meatspace, etc then maybe you're screwed up as well?

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    15. Re:A time bomb for the game industry? by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      Again with you trying to force your views on the world! Not everybody feels the same way about life as you do. Not everybody feels they need to be the most productive person alive.

      I am also supporting myself fresh out of college with a good paying job. But I also spend a lot of time playing games. Why? BECAUSE THEY'RE FUN! For me personally, life is about doing things I enjoy, and gaming is one of them. Who are you to say that people need to be furthering themselves academically or professionally to have meaning in their lives.

      Again, I'm not arguing that these are poor ideals for you to strive for. Its your life, more power to you. But you shouldn't be knocking these people because they do not share similar values in their lives. Its just not your place.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    16. Re:A time bomb for the game industry? by Joel+from+Sydney · · Score: 1

      Funnily enough, just this week Blizzard announced a new Parental Access Control for WoW. Little Johnny's parents can now set particular times and dates when he's allowed to access his WoW account, and when he isn't. It's doubtful many parents will actually use it (or how many kids won't be able to guess their parents' password), but at least the adding of this functionality shows Blizzard is listening.

      Would it have helped in this situation? Probably not, but it's a step in the right direction.

    17. Re:A time bomb for the game industry? by jeffasselin · · Score: 1

      Stories about don't prove anything. Show me serious studies.

      --
      If he explores all forms and substances Straight homeward to their symbol-essences; He shall not die.
    18. Re:A time bomb for the game industry? by Seeker310 · · Score: 1

      You know the tools and skills people use to succeed in WoW are very similar to the tools and skills people use to succeed in any aspect of their lives.

      For instance managing your time, forming productive personal relationships, making/spending/saving money, developing plans so that you can reach your future goals, a willingness to research related fields of knowledge so you can be more successful, and perhaps most telling, a desire to be successful/rich/powerful etc.

      All of the above traits and infinitely useful in having a successful and rewarding life...one problem with all of this however, is that in WoW, doing all of those things is alot easier than in the real world.

      On top of that if you DO use these traits in wow...and you do desire to be successful/whatever, the way the game works is that you end up spending more and more time playing the game in order to reach your altogether understandable goals.

      Think for instance of the sheer amount of playtime someone has to have when they end up with multiple lvl 60 characters with epic level gear. 60+++++ DAYS is not uncommon.

      And this is for a game that came out literally a year ago. spending whole months (or MORE) in game is not going to further your real life of course, but its so much easier as I said...and the more you want to succeed the more you will play.

      And the more you play, the less time you are spending on other areas of your life.

      Its hard for me to condemn this lawsuit because quite frankly as has been mentioned in the parent, MMORPGS are designed to be time intensive...they are designed with the hope that alot of people will spend alot of time in game. They are designed with the hope that people will buy the game...start to play...and never ever leave. All mmorpgs attempt to approach these ideals however they can.

      My 2 cents from a former player of wow and ffxi, and former college student......

    19. Re:A time bomb for the game industry? by Seeker310 · · Score: 1

      A "slightly physiologically addicting form of entertainment" could easily lead to neglecting aspects of real life. In fact one could say that all addicts end up neglecting aspects of their life. This could mean that the addict spends all his/her time/money on the addiction of the moment. It could mean they neglect the effects on their health (smokers anyone?), it could mean they end up falling of their chosen life path (or forced of as the case may be) e.g. broken marriages/relationships, getting kicked out of school, being born with a birth defect due to a parents use of in this case one of the more standard addictive behaviors... I mean its hard to say really that ANY addictive products -will- kill you. Its alot easier however to say that addictive products will negatively impact your life...and that some in fact could directly lead to death.

    20. Re:A time bomb for the game industry? by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      Um, this reads all wrong. I'm sorry but dealing with people in "reality" is much harder. If some guy annoys you in a video game you can just ignore him. Now imagine that's your boss or worse yet a customer. Sure in the long term you can get out of a crappy work situation it isn't like you can just up and leave at every slight disagreement.

      The game also doesn't have strict consequences.

      You slip up on a mission, you just do it over.

      You slip up with a customer, you get fired.

      video game != reality

      And really, if you're a teenager learning about how to talk and meet others from a video game you're socially behind the norm.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    21. Re:A time bomb for the game industry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The boss or customer would be analogous to your guild leader. If you piss him off, you might get booted from the guild, just like your boss might fire you. And from there, it'd be like in real life -- you're not dead, but you're seriously set back.

      But the game AI and mechanics, agreeably, aren't a substitute for interacting with people. Someone can get by in an MMORPG by themselves, just like someone can get by in life if they do the bare minimum it takes to subsist. In either case, they won't be on the corporate fast track that takes cooperation with others; MMORPGs can provide a framework for requiring interaction. They, like real life, present a set of resources to exploit, with the difference being that online, you aren't gaining anything tangible in the end.

      That's my problem with them, but they do, at the high level, teach interaction. Whether or not it's the type that can be abstracted to ever get the teenagers out of their parents' basements is another question.

  22. Precedent by InstantCrisis · · Score: 1

    Have families of persons killed while drinking and driving successfully sued alcohol companies? Have families of victims of gun violence successfully sued gun manufacturers? What happened when McDonalds was sued for causing obesity?

    The tobacco industry was successfully sued. What was different?

    1. Re:Precedent by vivarintoki · · Score: 0

      The tobacco industry tried to hide pertinent information on the damages that smoking can cause and it's chemically-addictive properties. I don't deny games can be addictive, but it's not at all the same thing.

    2. Re:Precedent by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 1

      Tobacco products (I'm thinking of cigarettes and cigars specifically) have been shown to cause bodily harm when used for long periods of time. And the industry has known of this forever, yet they continue to market and sell their products.

      For the other companies mentioned, the designed use of their product does NOT cause bodily harm, it's only when someone abuses them.

    3. Re:Precedent by Bazzalisk · · Score: 1
      Tobacco kills when used for its intended purpose?

      McDonalds food also causes obesity when used for its intended purpose - but only if overused - which McDonalds do not specificly encourage. The Tobacco industry intentionaly encourages regular use of tobacco and attempts to supress and throw doubt over its effects.

      --
      James P. Barrett
    4. Re:Precedent by josh.loomis · · Score: 1

      Anything is bad when overused. I think what makes the tobacco industry - cigarette companies in particular - different is that they like to pretend their products enhance one's life rather than shortening or damaging it. It's been that way for years and it's how they make money. Beer companies still advertise on TV but there's always the "enjoy responsibly" caveat. It really is a matter of personal intelligence and discretion.

      Or as St. Augustine said, "Everything in moderation. Including moderation."

      --
      I know, deep inside me, there's a Linux nut just waiting to be let out.
  23. where is the blame? by icepick72 · · Score: 1

    I think the real question is, how do you keep your game from getting into the hands of the fraction of the population that suffers from mental illness. Millions of teens play the game and don't want to kill themselves re-enacting a scene. It's not about the software company. It's about the player. I assume this kid would have eventually found some other way of escapism to do himself in with. Didn't the parents realize by the kid's behaviour that something odd was up *before* he killed himself?

    1. Re:where is the blame? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, quite true. The real blame lies with the parents. Hey, it looks like the Chinese are really starting to learn from America- don't take responsibility for raising your children, instead just blame and sue anything an everyone you can think of.

    2. Re:where is the blame? by Just-some-person · · Score: 1

      "Didn't the parents realize by the kid's behaviour that something odd was up *before* he killed himself?"

      No, the parents are just a stupid.

    3. Re:where is the blame? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Instead of posting off topic (jdkane):
      I hear ya. It's really starting to suck. I live in Canada and in my opinion we lag behind the stereotypical sue-your-ass-off-for-anything attitude, but gradually we're going that way. I certainly wish the rest of the world wouldn't got that way, however many people seem to be fascinated enough with North American civilization and want to emulate it. The last thing we need is one big "free" (sic. US definition) earth. I think the European Union has the best chance of escaping, but I don't know enough about it to comment.

  24. If you get your penis knob stuck in a CD....... by CyricZ · · Score: 4, Funny

    Suppose a man wishes to have sexual intercourse with a video game CD, and proceeds to place his penis into the hole in the centre. Now let us suppose that while thrusting, the CD manages to tear his cock's knob off. Should the video game designers and the CD pressers be held liable for creating a dangerous product, one so heinous that it resulted in a man losing his glans penis?

    --
    Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    1. Re:If you get your penis knob stuck in a CD....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      No.

      If you have further questions about your particular problem I recommend contacting a lawyer/physcian to discuss further actions.

    2. Re:If you get your penis knob stuck in a CD....... by Fluffy+the+attack+ki · · Score: 1

      There are two options: Either sue the CD manufacturer for distributing non-standard disks with holes too large to use in a standard player... or laugh at the guy with the really small, but not quote small enough, penis.

    3. Re:If you get your penis knob stuck in a CD....... by CyricZ · · Score: 1

      I suffer from severe impotency. I haven't been able to obtain, let alone maintain, and erection for well over a decade.

      Indeed, my penis is probably small enough to place through the centre of a CD or DVD. But it would not get stuck, as it cannot become stiff.

      --
      Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    4. Re:If you get your penis knob stuck in a CD....... by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      Suppose a man wishes to have sexual intercourse with a video game CD, and proceeds to place his penis into the hole in the centre.

      Dude, if your weiner is small enough to fit in there, you are at best, a boy. Not a man.
      Sorry ; )

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    5. Re:If you get your penis knob stuck in a CD....... by CthulhuDreamer · · Score: 1

      "Dude, if your weiner is small enough to fit in there..."

      If you had taken your enlargement pills like you were supposed to, you wouldn't have this problem.

    6. Re:If you get your penis knob stuck in a CD....... by anthropolemic · · Score: 1

      He should sue Match.com; their failure to provide him a good date put him in that situation.

  25. Could have been anything by Nichotin · · Score: 1

    And, if you jump to death to reenact a scene from a video game, you are basically a lunatic that could have been affected by anything. Lets ban everything that could give kids the impression that flying works, including pokemon.

    1. Re:Could have been anything by forgoil · · Score: 1

      Imagine what a kid that watched the news every night might do. Fuck, let's ban everything at let our wonderful leaders decide over what can and can not do. I personally think that Blizzard should sue the parents for not raising their son properly and then suing them and defiling their name (or rather give them great publicity "heard of that game the kid died from? Gotta try that one out!").

  26. There is a point. by jellomizer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Kids do stupid stuff. Heck when I was a Kid me and a bunch of others would climb to the highest point of the playground. a good 10 Feet and Jump off it and onto the pebbled ground pretending that we were He-Man, and those who didn't fall on their face, or have their hands or bent their knees the least won. Looking back to it It was really dumb and we could have easily got hurt or killed ourselves if we fell the wrong way. If it wasn't He-Man we would probably do it pretending something else. Kids do stupid things, they lack good judgement skills that is why 8 year olds are not allowed to vote or drive cars on public roads, it is not that they can't physically do it, but because they have poor judgement skills and left on their own they will more often then not make poor decisions. Older Kids are at an age where they work off their old phobias and see what they can do with their new found abilities. If the kid played Tetris he would probably still jump off the cliff pretending that he was his favorite piece.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:There is a point. by daigu · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I call B.S. This is a convenient story that people that are no longer kids like to tell themselves. I'd bet if you reflected on your entire life, jumping from a tree pretending you were He-Man probably wouldn't make your top 25 of all time stupid things you have done. If you were to make a top 25 list, probabilities would have that most of these happened while you were an adult.

      I used to do flips off my roof into a pool. Stupid? Yeah. Top 25 stupid? Probably not. Kids are testing boundries - and there is inherent risk in doing so. Adults more frequently do stupid things out of complacency. There's a reason why people take notice of a kid jumping off a tree and killing themselves. There's also a reason why people don't think twice about people that kill themselves (or worse, another) because they were driving and talking on the cell phone - or some other "normal" activity. Which do you think is more common?

    2. Re:There is a point. by Dhalka226 · · Score: 1

      I recall seeing a story on the local news in Chicago a month or two back. It was in regards to teenagers taking more and bigger risks than adults, specifically why they're worse drivers, and they actually had scientists presenting new evidence making the case that it's really true. If I recall correctly, it's a brain development issue and the part of the brain that regulates risky behavior is simply not fully developed.

      Ahh, here we go, a link: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A526 87-2005Jan31.html?sub=AR

      As far as relating that to the article itself... no, that still doesn't make suing game companies for stupid kids the right thing to do.

    3. Re:There is a point. by Jeremi · · Score: 1
      I used to do flips off my roof into a pool. Stupid? Yeah. Top 25 stupid? Probably not


      Just out of curiosity, what are some of the things in your Top 25? (either I've led a sheltered life, or most people are lot.... erm, braver than I thought ;^))

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    4. Re:There is a point. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      found this on bash.org

      #488793 +(3319)- [X]

      : Best suicide plan ever
      : what is it?
      : you go up to the top of a roof
      : string piano wire tight across the front edge at neck level
      : tie a cord to your foot and the other end to the building so that you'll be above sidewalk level when its fully stretched
      : then you put super glue on your hands
      : and put your arms around the front of the wire and then back to touch your head
      : then you lean forward, so the piano wire cuts your neck but not your elbows
      : when the cord goes taut, youll be hanging upside down with no head....except your head will be in your outstretched arms thanks to gravity and the glue, staring at someone upside down and spewing blood everywhere.
      : And some poor bastard will be traumatized for LIFE.
      : i dont think i can be your friend anymore

    5. Re:There is a point. by PixelScuba · · Score: 1

      I don't think the parent was making a point about the lawsuit being valid, but it seemed he was making a point about how it's not video games, children are naturally foolish and oblivious. Unlike adults, children have no sense of mortality and do things we would say, "Jesus that would hurt. Hell it'd probably kill me." Fortunately children are malliable at that point in their life so what WOULD kill us doesn't them.

    6. Re:There is a point. by syukton · · Score: 1

      Haha, this actually reminds me of something that I witnessed when I was a lot younger, probably 6 years old or so.

      I was at one of my relatives' house and me, my brother (~3 years old), and my cousin (~5) were all jumping off a bed in one of the bedrooms and landing on the carpeted floor on our knees with a loud "thud" which we thought was terribly exciting. My cousin was reluctant to jump at first but he witnessed my brother and I make multiple jumps with no ill effect, so he thought he'd give it a shot. He enjoyed the first jump but the second jump...oh boy did he scream. On the second jump, he broke both of his legs.

      Looking back to it, I really don't know why he broke his legs and we (my brother and I) didn't. Diet, maybe?

      --
      Reinvent the wheel only at either a lower cost, greater effectiveness, or your own personal enrichment and satisfaction.
    7. Re:There is a point. by daigu · · Score: 1

      I've seen this too. However, I think there is a difference between being predisposed to take more and bigger risks and having bad judgment. I guess the argument I was making that complacency is more frequently a cause of bad outcomes and poor judgment than risk taking. Let's not be be patronizing just because of a teenagers stage of development - especially without taking a cold, hard look at the problems at being fully adult and how they actually compare.

    8. Re:There is a point. by symbolic · · Score: 1

      If it wasn't He-Man we would probably do it pretending something else. Kids do stupid things, they lack good judgement skills that is why 8 year olds are not allowed to vote or drive cars on public roads,

      Have you seen the average driver lately?

    9. Re:There is a point. by Stiletto · · Score: 1


      Consider yourself lucky. If you and your friends were kids today and did this, you'd all be committed to the nearest children's psychiatric hospital and pumped full of enough Ritalin to make you nice docile conforming numb-bots.

      For your own good, of course.

    10. Re:There is a point. by daigu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I can think of many things that I've done that were much more dangerous as an adult. For example, I had to drive what typically takes two hours in a blizzard to catch a flight. It took closer to six. I saw several dozen cars, semis and other vehicles in ditches at the side of the road. Half the time my car had no traction at 20mph or less. Lots of ambulances, etc. There is no way I would have done anything like this as a child - and it is a direct function of complacency. I needed to make that flight, and I did. In the process I did something far riskier than I ever did as a child.

      I can think of many other examples where adult responsbilities put you into a position to take risks - moreso than you would take as a risk loving teen. Haven't you had the same experience?

    11. Re:There is a point. by daigu · · Score: 1

      I disagree. I was not any more naturally foolish and oblivious now than I was as a child. My sense of morality didn't just come upon me as an adult. It was there all along.

    12. Re:There is a point. by Vicissidude · · Score: 1

      Well, I call BS on your BS!

      This is what people with experience looking back on their lives realize. There is no patronizing involved. From your skepticism, you are probably NOT old enough to realize just how stupid some of the things you did.

      8 year-olds are spastic morons. From home movies, I realize I was a spastic moron as well. That is why we don't allow them to drive. Teenagers are a little older, a little less spastic, but they are still morons. That makes them able to get in far greater danger. At 16, I allowed my friends to ride on the hood of my car while I drove up to 50 MPH. At the time, I didn't see any problem with it. No one got hurt, but I now realize that it was COLOSSALLY stupid. This is despite the fact that at 17, I earned a high enough IQ score to enter MENSA. My stupidity was more a factor of my age and immaturity rather than my raw intelligence.

      And no, that does not rank the same as driving and talking on a cell phone. There is little danger of me getting into an accident when I am the only one driving on the highway. Even if I do speak on the phone in traffic, then I am only a little more distracted. Even so, I have 15 years of driving experience to fall back on, which is itself not that hard of an activity. I am far less likely to get into an accident than a driving teenager with little experience getting distracted by three other teenagers in the car.

      You may not think jumping from your roof into the pool was that dangerous. That's probably because very little ever went wrong. However, had you ever landed on the ground rather than the pool, then you would probably think otherwise. Had you ever cracked your head on the bottom of the pool, then you would probably think otherwise. Give yourself a few years and then you'll realize how colossally stupid you were. Then, that'll land on your top-25 stupid things.

    13. Re:There is a point. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are 8 year olds allowed to vote when they're not on public roads, then?

    14. Re:There is a point. by daigu · · Score: 1

      I'm in my mid-thirties. Square that with your comment.

      Try doing a little research. I believe there are no conclusive studies but the general number I have seen is that cell phone use makes you four times more likely to be involved in a crash. Check out how many accidents where it is a factor - in those states that track it. I don't know how different this is for the probablity in being in an accident and being a teenager (not using a cell phone) - but I'd wager it is not much higher.

      My point is that adults have other weaknesses - like an over-estimation of their competencies due to their experience - that are as bad as those teens have. Thanks for helping me illustrate my point.

    15. Re:There is a point. by Jeremi · · Score: 1
      I can think of many other examples where adult responsbilities put you into a position to take risks - moreso than you would take as a risk loving teen. Haven't you had the same experience?


      Frankly, no... I think part of 'adult reponsibility' is avoiding unreasonable risks. In the example above, that might mean calling up my boss (or whomever) and telling him I simply can't make the flight due to bad weather, rather than unduly risking my life to make it.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    16. Re:There is a point. by PixelScuba · · Score: 1

      Being foolish isn't about morality. Kids just do dumb things, dangerous things... I know I work with kids all day. You either don't remember anything about your childhood, or to this day you still hang upside down from monkey bars and drop seeing who reaches the ground first.

    17. Re:There is a point. by Vicissidude · · Score: 1

      No, you do a little research. Teenagers are far more dangerous when driving than an experienced driver with a cell phone.

      The effect of teen crashes in Washington State:

      * Fatal teen traffic collisions are more than DOUBLE the rate of all other drivers combined.
      * Vehicular collisions are the LEADING cause of death for young Washington citizens ages 15-20.
      * From 1993-98 a total of 753 people lost their lives on Washington roads as a result of teen driver crashes.

      Fact:
      For decades, automobile crashes have been and still are the number one killer of Americans ages 15 to 20. In 1999, according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, about 520,000 teens were injured and more than 4,900 died in automobile crashes. That is an average of over thirteen deaths every day, or approximately one teen in every state every four days. These numbers continue to go up in spite of the fact that deaths and injuries for all other Driver age groups have dropped in the last decade.

    18. Re:There is a point. by daigu · · Score: 1

      Better yet, you could use the National Safety Council:

      More than 3,800 young drivers age 15-20 are killed every year in traffic crashes. More than 326,000 young drivers are injured.

      Now, lets go to the cell phone issue - using the same site I used before:

      A 2003 article published by the Harvard Center for Risk Analysis (HCRA) estimated that cell phone use by drivers may cause approximately 2,600 deaths, 330,000 moderate to critical injuries, and 1.5 million instances of property damage in America per year. The report cautioned, however, that because information on cell phone use by motorists is limited, the effects are difficult to gauge. HCRA concluded that fatalities could range from 800 to 8,000 per year, with injury estimates ranging from 100,000 to 1 million per year.

      There is not enough data either way to say which is more dangerous. But I think we can say that just being young is not more of a source of risk than other behaviors many adults engage in - such as talking on a cell phone while driving.

    19. Re:There is a point. by Vicissidude · · Score: 1

      Interesting that the cell phone data is not broken down by age. It appears you are using overlapping statistics. Certainly, teenage drivers also use their cell phones.

      So, how do we tie this together properly? Let's look at this statistic, previously cited and unrefuted by you: "Fatal teen traffic collisions are more than DOUBLE the rate of all other drivers combined." Yes, combined. So, regardless of any other statistics you cite regarding driver safety, teenagers are far more reckless and dangerous then everyone else combined.

      As far as I'm concerned, that's enough to conclusively end this conversation.

    20. Re:There is a point. by daigu · · Score: 1

      Not really. Fatal collisions is only one metric out of dozens you could use - such as total collisions, collisions causing injury, etc. You also do not know if there is causal relationship between recklessness and accidents. Perhaps it is because teens are all talking on cell phones, driving older cars, have more people in a car at a given time, the fact that more teens live in metropolitan areas than other places, etc.

      You cannot say anything conclusive about how the risks that teens pose stack up against other risks - such as cell phone use and driving - and how other factors contribute. Perhaps if you had a lot of data from insurance companies you could build a workable model - but without such a model you would have to argue based on an unsubstantiated prejudices on our part. This is my point.

    21. Re:There is a point. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Absolutely agree with this. It's nothing to do with the game, it's to do with kids' 'spirit of misadventure'. WoW just happens to be the random arbitrary stand-in explanation for such this time around. I'm sure the parents must be suffering an unbearable feeling of loss, and unavoidably that's going to be channeled as anger towards what they (perhaps irrationally) perceive to be the cause of their child's death. It's just a shame that this kind of case is actually allowed to go to court rather than being recognised as the knee-jerk emotional reaction that it is.

  27. Sue The Parents by przemeklach · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm not sure if such an organization exists but there should be an organization that sues the parents in cases such as this. Where were the parents? Slacking off? Don't say that parents can't keep an eye on their children all the time becuase that is bs. Both my parents worked and they still managed to keep me from inserting things up my nose and jumping out of windows.

    1. Re:Sue The Parents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Where were the parents? Slacking off? Don't say that parents can't keep an eye on their children all the time becuase that is bs. Both my parents worked and they still managed to keep me from inserting things up my nose and jumping out of windows.

      So you're saying you had zero minutes out of your parents sight between age 0 and 18? Boy must your childhood have sucked.

    2. Re:Sue The Parents by tjma2001 · · Score: 1

      That would be retarded... you cant sue people for being too stupid to be able to raise their kids.. in fact this kid should be "exhaulted" (however you spell that) ..he was cleanly and safely erased his stupid genes from the gene pool at just the right age...he has clearly made the world a better place by removing himself and any possible future dumbasses from being born... Darwin Awards for the win Now all thats left is teh parents for suing Blizzard becuase they were clearly unable to see that their child was unable to differentiate a couple of pixels on the screen to reality

    3. Re:Sue The Parents by Narc · · Score: 1

      I think most parents preventing their kids putting things up their nose would be better spent on them >age of 18.

      Sticking a crayon up your nose when you're 5 is fun, but for the most part wont do you much damage. Put more adult things up your nose and blammo, lots more fun but lots more damage.

    4. Re:Sue The Parents by Alef · · Score: 1
      Where were the parents? Slacking off? Don't say that parents can't keep an eye on their children all the time becuase that is bs. Both my parents worked and they still managed to keep me from inserting things up my nose and jumping out of windows.

      The fact that you and all of us managed to survive our childhood proves absolutely nothing. If you had not you wouldn't be here to make that comment.

      Kids don't immediately go and commit suicide the first second their parents look away. Kids occasionally do stupid things when their parents aren't around, however, but in 99.9% of the cases it turns out OK, and nobody blames the parents. If you take a large enough population, there will always be cases where kids kill themselves, but it doesn't necessarily mean the parents were neglectful (not more than the average parent anyway).

    5. Re:Sue The Parents by syukton · · Score: 1

      I think that what was said was more along the lines that the minutes which were spent between parent and child were constructive and meaningful and led to the building of good character and judgement which resulted in the capable adult human being representing themself today on slashdot. A lot of people think they "spend enough time" with their kids, but they don't spend enough meaningful, constructive time with their kids.

      --
      Reinvent the wheel only at either a lower cost, greater effectiveness, or your own personal enrichment and satisfaction.
    6. Re:Sue The Parents by SirPavlova · · Score: 1

      What on earth is 'meaningful, constructive' time?

      I'm not a parent, & I'd honestly like to know the answer. I can't see what qualifies... what separates the meaningful & constructive from the not so?

      --
      Yar.
    7. Re:Sue The Parents by syukton · · Score: 1

      Teaching your kids right from wrong, teaching them about responsibility and hard work. Teaching them the difference between fantasy and reality. Teaching them about compassion, honesty, and loyalty. Endowing your children with skills and abilities that will help them to mature and eventually achieve independence. Real, honest "quality time."

      Discussing literature (or even movies), for example, is infinitely more valuable to the growth of a child's character than discussing a sporting event, and yet so many parents think that taking their children to see a sporting event and talking about who "won" is going to somehow enrich them. Is there every any instance in life where there's a clearly defined winner and a loser? Is the concept of a winner and a loser even meaningful at all? Even children's books 10 or 20 pages long have characters that have emotions and learning to express one's emotions and inner thoughts is an extremely important skill in life. What emotions do football players express? What, if anything, do they express?

      The meaningful and constructive time is the time spent building the child into an adult. That's the responsibility of the parent, when they choose to have children (a responsibility many parents shirk, I might add). Upon having a child they undertake an 18-year journey during which they should be constructing a reasonable, capable, confident, honest, loyal, mature citizen of the world.

      The kind of quality time some people are spending with their children is leading us to a society where the adults still think and act like children. The parents of the child in this story are the case in point. More parents need to actually raise their children, instead of leaving that job to the television, video games, the internet, or the neighbor's dumbass kids.

      --
      Reinvent the wheel only at either a lower cost, greater effectiveness, or your own personal enrichment and satisfaction.
    8. Re:Sue The Parents by SirPavlova · · Score: 1

      Okay, now I know what you mean. Thanks.

      I probably should have thought more before asking that question - but everything you're saying about crappy parenting, though I know intellectually that it happens, seems surreal. Your idea of 'quality time' seems to just be The Way Things Ought To Be(TM), if you know what I mean. It's just the natural state of affairs in my head.

      Actually it's what you said about sporting events which made me understand... it's hard to explain but for me that embodies shallow & meaningless relationships.

      On rereading this, the last paragraph comes across as being far more arrogant than I intended, but I can't see how to rephrase it without increasing that... so, yeah, sorry about that.

      --
      Yar.
    9. Re:Sue The Parents by Morgalyn · · Score: 1

      ::applause::

      --
      You say you got a real solution
      Well, you know
      We'd all love to see the plan
      (The Beatles)
    10. Re:Sue The Parents by danila · · Score: 1

      This doesn't sound like a good idea, really... I am 25, I have a 140+ IQ, I am well-adjusted, have good social skills, extremely smart, successful, etc. My mother taught me to read when I was 3 years old, I went to school at 5. I was always the brightest kid in the class, even when I entered a specal school for gifted kids in 8th grade. I am hardly the stereotypical dumb kid that should lose in our darwinian game.

      And yet, I sticked needles into an electric socket, I burned paper on a stove (holding it in my hand), I once stuck a small part of a constructor in my nostril (my "friend" in kindergarden talked me into it, and I had to be taken to hospital) and probably did some other dumb stuff, while "exploring the world". :) Granted, I mostly stopped doing dangerous things around 5 years or so, but still.

      Raising kids is difficult and some kids are especially tricky. And while I agree that in some cases parents should be blamed, I don't think this is one of them. If you want to start a Sue The Parents foundation, I suggest you start with suing them for infanticide, physical and mental abuse and not cultivating love for learning in them.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
  28. This Is Good News... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    The fact that lawyers in Communist China are being allowed to file frivolous lawsuits to chase after the money is good news that capitalism is being warmly embraced by that society. It won't be long before the government passes a law banning Shakespeare because he advocated killing all the lawyers.

    1. Re:This Is Good News... by kellar · · Score: 1

      wait til they get started on the smoking. although that probably wouldn't be frivolous.

      --
      k e l l a r
    2. Re:This Is Good News... by MobyTurbo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually, I think this whole lawsuit is China's shield for another crackdown on internet usage. China wants to censor their internet as much as possible. If they can use "think about the children" as an excuse this lawsuit could be, and probably will be, used in the service of propaganda.

  29. I'm no parent but.. by Muppski · · Score: 1

    There is no fact but I assume the parents bought the game for the 13-yeard old kid right?
    Isen't it their responsibility to see what their kids are doing?

    Even if they did see WoW I dont think they would go : "Omg you'r gonna hurt yourself , no more WoW for you".

    Btw they can shut down WoW in china for all I care :D

  30. As much as this is a stupid lawsuit... by abigsmurf · · Score: 1

    I could see Blizzard potentially being sued for promoting unhealthy addictive behaviour. The game is designed to take as long as possible while still keeping you hooked. I'm glad I quit after I realised I was spending 3 hours at a time instance grinding for slightly improved items...

    1. Re:As much as this is a stupid lawsuit... by tomstdenis · · Score: 2, Interesting

      See a normal person would just get annoyed and stop playing ... :-)

      Sorry, but "game lengtheners" [a technique not limited to RPGs] are really annoying and drive me to stop playing a game [or at least the way intended].

      A "game lengthener" is a device in a game [e.g. "strategy"] that doesn't add to the story line but takes a long time to complete [usually because you have to redo the challenge over and over and over]. GTA is famous for those with timed missions were your margin of error can be as short as a matter of SECONDS in a mission that can last minutes.

      Most puzzle type games use these as well. You can tell you've been had when either you realize you're on a mission for the 18th time or you finish the game in a weekend and go "that's all?" In the case of GTA I rarely do missions and mostly just drive around blowing shit up [and finding bugs in the engine]. The missions are mostly retarded anyways "pick this up, blow that up, catch this guy who is 84 miles away".

      In games like WoW where you have to "gain EXP" to level up and some missions clearly require high levels it's just a matter of getting you hooked to play more and more and eventually pay Blizzard more monthly fees.

      Personally if I were to sit down to "power up" something it would be my mind by reading more books not my imaginary character on a game server...

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  31. What a dumbass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fell to his death after jumping? Should have had gnomish engineering and a parachute cape before playing around BRM. Or slow fall. Or safe fall. Or feline grace. Or blessing of protection. Or levitate. He was probably a fricking hunter or something... Moron. Get what you deserve. Of course, maybe he was relying on mana shield but forgot about the patch causing mana shield to no longer absorb fall damage... so I'll give him the benefit of the doubt I guess.

  32. This is starting to piss me off. by Xarius · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There is no way in this world to prove that the child in question re-created a scene from a computer game, unless he left a detailed suicide note detailing that he was mimicing a fictional world.

    Perhaps the world could do with either a) less irresponsible parents or b) less stupid children, or my personal favourite c) both.

    I mean seriously, I'm going to consume babies and then sue the Vatican because a passage in the Bible inspired me to do so*. Would I get away with being such a moron, of course not. A much preferred headline would have been: Parents imprisoned for failure to properly raise a child.

    * Here is the passage:
    "And the king said unto her, What aileth thee? And she answered, This woman said unto me, Give thy son, that we may eat him to day, and we will eat my son to morrow. So we boiled my son, and did eat him: and I said unto her on the next day, Give thy son,that we may eat him: and she hath hid her son. -- II Kings 6:28,29

    --
    C17H21NO4
    1. Re:This is starting to piss me off. by syukton · · Score: 1

      No way in the world to prove it?

      Maybe he posted about it in his blog (well, unlikely for China these days) or website before going to do it.
      Maybe he has a diary.
      Maybe he was dressed up like his in-game character.
      Maybe there were witnesses.
      Maybe he told somebody what he was going to do before going to do it.

      The list goes on. There are plenty of ways to prove it, perhaps even beyond a reasonable doubt. I mean if he's dressed up like a night elf and he jumped carrying his "magical staff" how much more evidence do you want? heh.

      --
      Reinvent the wheel only at either a lower cost, greater effectiveness, or your own personal enrichment and satisfaction.
    2. Re:This is starting to piss me off. by quantum+bit · · Score: 1

      I mean seriously, I'm going to consume babies and then sue the Vatican because a passage in the Bible inspired me to do so*.

      Anyone who reads that and then eats babies because of it isn't literate. It's not telling you to eat babies, it's telling you to not be a dumbass.

    3. Re:This is starting to piss me off. by martinX · · Score: 1

      He may have been dressed up like an elf and carrying his staff, but he could have been thrown off a building by the local bullies.

      Where's Gil Grissom when you need him?

      --
      When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
    4. Re:This is starting to piss me off. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly

    5. Re:This is starting to piss me off. by patonw · · Score: 1

      not that I don't think this was darwinism at work, but perhaps his friends were interrogated by his parents/state police and confessed that it was a reenactment of the video game.

      Still, see the link in the first post.

  33. why did he jump? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    dumbass theres gravity and fall damage in WoW. Thats right the game accurately shows the consequence of jumping off really high shit. Maybe if he played the game more he would have known not to jump. Come to think of it if he hadn't stopped playing the game he wouldn't have been able to jump off anything he'd be safely sitting on his ass in front of a puter

    LFG!

  34. Of all the things we outsourced to China.... by lightningrod220 · · Score: 1

    ... why did stupidity and lawsuit-crazy lawyers have to be part of it?

    1. Re:Of all the things we outsourced to China.... by SgtFajita · · Score: 1

      Because we have a surplus, obviously.

  35. From jumping? I was expecting a blood clot death. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought the article was going to say he died while at boarding school from a blood clot (caused from lack of physical movement 20 hours a day, everyday, for a few months) that went to his brain and killed him. You could almost feel the parents' anger at something like that.

  36. Zhang Chunliang - "The Chinese Jack Thompson" by rayhigh · · Score: 0

    Perhaps Zhang and Jacky boy could hold an international summit.

  37. God, let brain rain from the sky! by Ulrich+Hobelmann · · Score: 1

    So now you can sue somebody for *showing* you stuff that might result in death IRL? Or for telling you a fantasy tale about how people grow wings and fly?

    1. Re:God, let brain rain from the sky! by Mahou · · Score: 1

      yeh chinese movies have some of the worst "physics" modeling i have ever seen (ie. jet li movies, house of flying daggers, etc.) how do they know he wasn't trying to be a crouching tiger or perhaps a hidden dragon?

      --
      if i'm not immortal, what's the point of living?
      ...te?
  38. I've read this article before by Daimando · · Score: 0

    And needless to say, I was in a bad mood when I read this. I'm already embarrased to be a gamer, an American, a Christain, and a part-Chinese(I'm part-Chinese, part-Japanese, part-Hawaiian and part-Irish). If stuff like this keeps up in our world, I'll end up ashamed of the human race.

    1. Re:I've read this article before by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      I guess that makes you Chapawairish, then. Me, I'm Greek, German, Irish and a smidgen of Polish, which would make me Gripolirmanish.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  39. Where were the parents BEFORE the death? by a_greer2005 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    If the kid is so fucking addicted to a game, why didnt the parents pull the fucking plug?!?!?!?!?

    I dont know about you but if I didnt do my homework, clean my room, take the garbage out and so on, Mom would like clock work un plug the Nintendo...Have parents lost their authority?

    1. Re:Where were the parents BEFORE the death? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Uhhh...because the kid was probably playing the game at a Computer center, not at home? This is set in China, not some US suburb.

      Computer game addiction is a problem in China, if you go into any Internet lab it's immediately fucking obvious. There are attempts to create limited-hour computer labs at schools, "rehab centers", and I guess suing is the latest one - the lawsuit is being backed by some anti-addiction group.

    2. Re:Where were the parents BEFORE the death? by almostmanda · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that this is a subscription based game that Mommy and Daddy were probably paying for. I really doubt a 13 year old had the credit card required to set up his own account, much less the income to pay for it. If he was "addicted" they could have cancelled his subscription. If this same mom bought her son copious amounts of alcohol and then sued Bacardi when he died of alcohol poisoning, she would be laughed out of court. This is ridiculous.

    3. Re:Where were the parents BEFORE the death? by Bellum+Aeternus · · Score: 1
      Have parents lost their authority?

      No, not in China. These parents are probably working 16 hours days for some company that supplies cheap parts for you keyboard and simply cannot afford to be home watching their kid because they only make $8 / day.

      --
      - I voted for Nintendo and against Bush
  40. Retards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... so next will be movies... books... the news... the discovery channel - "hey that animal is eating another animal, maybe I can eat you then!" ...

    Retards..

  41. Congratulations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your child is a moron!

  42. Governing Gameplay from on high... by foniksonik · · Score: 4, Interesting

    From TFA:

    "The Chinese government has already said it plans to restrict gamers to three hours of consecutive play, using a "fatigue technique" in games. After three hours of play, the online game would lose some player power, and after five hours, the player would lose most power. After that, there would be a delay of five hours before the game could be accessed to its full capacity."

    I'd be curious to find out if this proposal might actually enhance gameplay. This could be the first good thing to come out of China's Government... you'd be forced to spend the time you have to play doing worthwhile things that are fun instead of being able to 'grind' players up the rankings...

    On the other hand if this was forced on the Game Developers and Distributors legally, ie. they have to build it in to their system... it would set a very bad precedent for all products of all types.... think cars and driving, or cellphones or TV viewing. Imagine a curfew system for using anything electronic, where you can only use it during preset times and for pre-approved purposes (well I guess you don't have to imagine it, just move to China and try using the internet). China's attempt to regulate the people's behavior is going to backlash in a major way soon, IMHO. They want all the benefits of a free market but all the control of a closed market... can't have it both ways...

    --
    A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    1. Re:Governing Gameplay from on high... by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      In the BBS day we had a solution which was to time limit your connection. Of course that was because most BBSes had only 1 line [sometimes a couple] and wanted to share with others.

      So why not make RPGs where you can only play 1 hour per 24 hour period?

      In the grand scheme of things it makes sales sense since the player progresses EVEN SLOWER through the game and it has the social benefit of not having losers play 24 hours a day.

      Of course this won't stop people from making 24 accounts ... I guess you can limit it to one per credit card or something...

      Point is, it's trivial to solve WITHOUT modifying gameplay.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    2. Re:Governing Gameplay from on high... by ProstheticSwan · · Score: 0

      I'd personally prefer to limit the fascism in my gaming to the Nazis I fight in Call of Duty 2

    3. Re:Governing Gameplay from on high... by Idimmu+Xul · · Score: 1

      In the BBS day we had a solution which was to time limit your connection. Of course that was because most BBSes had only 1 line [sometimes a couple] and wanted to share with others.
      So why not make RPGs where you can only play 1 hour per 24 hour period?
      In the grand scheme of things it makes sales sense since the player progresses EVEN SLOWER through the game and it has the social benefit of not having losers play 24 hours a day.
      Of course this won't stop people from making 24 accounts ... I guess you can limit it to one per credit card or something...
      Point is, it's trivial to solve WITHOUT modifying gameplay.

      Rubbish.
      A lot of MMORPGs have quests that take over several hours to complete, part of the incentive for MMORPGs is that the time spent playing them, to a degree, is worth while. Diluting a game to segments of only 1 hour or less would be really stupid, especially if the player was one of those that liked to walk about, interact and think as they played, rather than simply rushing through, or if they were not very proficient at the game, they'ed never get anywhere as they'ed get kicked off after 60 minutes.
      Your idea would kill the genre.

      --
      The problem with slashdot is that most of its users were bullied and stuffed into lockers as kids!
    4. Re:Governing Gameplay from on high... by maniac+trek · · Score: 1

      Actually, in the early days of WoW, there was a system quite like this. If you're familiar with the rest system and gaining double experience while in cities and inns, similarly after playing for a while you would become exhausted and gain half experience. Because of the complaining from hardcore gamers, however, they eliminated the exhausted state.

    5. Re:Governing Gameplay from on high... by qwerty+shrdlu · · Score: 1

      The "fatigue system" would add an element of realism to game play. Or, you could play WoW and Everquest and Star Wars galaxies and that Korean time sink whatever its called and still have 4 hours a day left over for eating shitting and Xbox.

    6. Re:Governing Gameplay from on high... by edunbar93 · · Score: 1

      it would set a very bad precedent for all products of all types.... think cars and driving,

      Or maybe working? Man, that would be terrible if the government mandated that you *must* take a break at least every 3 or 4 hours. It would erode productivity and workers would expect things like *benefits* and *overtime* and a minimum wage! Hell, if we weren't allowed to force employees to stay awake for 48 hours at a stretch through the use of amphetamines, then the whole system would collapse!

      --
      "No problem. I have the capacity to do infinite work so long as you don't mind that my quality approaches zero."-Dilbert
    7. Re:Governing Gameplay from on high... by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      Your idea would kill the genre.

      You mean the genre of no save points and long [pointless] quests to power up an imaginary character?

      Yeah, I fucking hope so.

      I'm all for fantasy role playing. It's fun, it's healthy.

      But if you have to play for hours straight to "enjoy it" it's clearly not good. I mean many drug addicts enjoy their drug. Doesn't mean it's good for them. All in moderation [same goes for the "legal" drugs like tobacco and caffeine].

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    8. Re:Governing Gameplay from on high... by Idimmu+Xul · · Score: 1

      You mean the genre of no save points and long [pointless] quests to power up an imaginary character?
      Yeah, I fucking hope so.
      I'm all for fantasy role playing. It's fun, it's healthy.
      But if you have to play for hours straight to "enjoy it" it's clearly not good. I mean many drug addicts enjoy their drug. Doesn't mean it's good for them. All in moderation [same goes for the "legal" drugs like tobacco and caffeine].

      Again, utter rubbish.
      For starters, all the MMORPGs I've played have same points, and your imaginary character diatribe pretty much nullifies in your eyes all computer games, board games and even things like fantasy football league, showing a distinct lack of objectivity in your reasoning.
      Fantasy role playing also involves leveling up imaginery characters with pointless quests and in my experience, depending on the game, easily between 2-6 hours for a typical session, depending on the game, the level of the players and the frequency that they meet.
      Many things become more meaningful, and therefore more enjoyable or personal, with time as you watch it grow, be it your pencil and paper rpg character, or a collection of some sort, or a character in a computer game. Sure you can get away sometimes with playing for 1 hour sessions which you enjoy, but with a 2 hour session you can have twice as much depth in the adventure and enjoy it more, this is forgetting the ammount of effort and time it takes to form a squad or party in a MMORPG, whether you are putting the hours in as a member of a guild, or searching for pubbies that aren't completly useless.

      Whether playing a MMORPG is worth while with respect to what you can accomplish with your money and freetime isn't up for debate, and neither are your personal feelings or opinions on MMORPG systems as they are obviously skewed.

      --
      The problem with slashdot is that most of its users were bullied and stuffed into lockers as kids!
    9. Re:Governing Gameplay from on high... by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      The problem is after two hours of continuous play you're not "done".

      I wouldn't recommend people do much of anything for two hours continously including study or work. You say a typical "session" can run upto 6 hours long. I say that's sick. If you regularly play a game for six hours at a time you need to re-value your life.

      And if the genre REQUIRES this level of obsession to enjoy it [which I disagree with] then many the genre IS destructive and should be shunned from society?

      Point for the case, my friend Phil Thibault [who posts on slashdot] all but disappeared when WoW came out. He was on MSN messenger frequently, we emailed back and forth and he even posted here. Now he's stuck in that game with every waking fucking hour.

      The last few times I saw him all he could talk about is the latest happenings in WoW [e.g. game changes, his characters, etc]. Now I think he's an ok guy but clearly he's let the game take over his priorities. I imagine many other people here can describe a similar situation.

      I don't blame the game for it the same way I don't blame the drugs for an addict. That doesn't mean I advocate the game. I think the game IS a horrible waste of time and it more than not encourages this level of obsession.

      I remember games like FF for the GB and NES where you could save anywhere. You could do a mission or part of one, save, turn the thing off and do something else. None of this "must level up before 18:00 or else!!!".

      You may look at the game as fun but think about it. What are you really accomplishing and how much does it cost you? You can have fun without consuming gobs of time alone on your computer.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    10. Re:Governing Gameplay from on high... by Idimmu+Xul · · Score: 1

      You should be my boss, I'd love to go home after 2 hours of work \o/

      The thing that makes the MMORPG different from all other computer games is the level of online social interaction and team work that is required in order to solve tasks. Many people don't think of it as simply 'playing a game' due to this interaction, and whilst many people do lose themselves in to the game, for whatever reason or other, many others don't. When you are interacting with people from all over the world in an event, unfortunatly it becomes impossible to just inject random save points.

      It doesnt even take a MMORPG to cause this, my last housemate got just as involved in Football Manager as your friend appears to have in WoW, and only left his room for 20 mins a day to order a takeaway. Anyone unfortunate enough to meet him on his path would then be hounded with how well his team was doing.

      Again, you're not really alone if you're talking to 19 other people using a voice/chat system and it allows people to escape reality, that's the accomplishment. You can have fun without playing a computer game, but you can't go around slaying Orcs in the real world, or flying space ships, or trading. There is no instant gratification like that. Even real world similarities require too much, if not more dedication. Professional soldiers, athletes or fighters will probably spend more time training than someone will put in to a computer game virtually living the game's equivalent life.

      The problem isn't with MMORPGs, it's with family and friends. My Football Manager playing friend lives off his parents money and plays instead of going to University, he's now retaking his 2nd year for the 3rd time. And despite informing his parents, they don't seem to care, and the University certainly doesn't care as the tuition money keeps flowing. Short of beating him to the ground, with his rent/food/bills all being paid for him, there is little left the rest of the house can do.

      I've played, and completed Guildwars, typically playing about 10 hrs a week, 2-4 hours at a time, and I'm a perfectly stable, solvent IT manager who has also participated, in a small way, to the development of a currently running MMORPG. This whole 1/2 hour limit thing is, again, all rubbish. What if someone plays a MMORPG for 6 hours straight one day then doesn't touch it again for a week? Are they worse in someway than the person that plays for 1 hour a day every day?

      The problem lies with this kids parents. What kind of shitty upbringing must he have had with parents so uncapable as to let him get addicted enough to kill himself in the first place, what was he using the game to escape from? Like you say, it's moderation, and you need, afaik, credit/debit cards to pay for all the games monthly so I'd assume that there is atleast someone in the chain deemed responsible somewhere...

      --
      The problem with slashdot is that most of its users were bullied and stuffed into lockers as kids!
    11. Re:Governing Gameplay from on high... by maggoty · · Score: 1

      I have to agree with you there. I've lost my housemate to this woeful game. Now he spends all of his time in his bedroom playing this game, day and night, often missing out on meals and what not just to play the game. We never ever see him anymore. He has been getting colds and the flu a lot more lately as well. I'm betting his ammune system is way down. Its so weird, even though he lives in the same house. As for the game itself, it bores the hell out of me. To slow and crap. I like playing games, but in reality, don't get much time at all to play. I'm to busy doing other misc things. Ocaisonally I'll get an hour here to there on the xbox, but thats about it. cheers!

    12. Re:Governing Gameplay from on high... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've seen these multi-hour quests...

      Everybody reading played whack the foozle (kill NPCs to get XP and loot) ? The multi-hour quest is just whack the foozle repeated over and over until you've whacked a lot of really big foozles. Sure, there are twists. The foozle spawns more foozles unless you kill it fast, the foozle is proof against non-magical damage, foozle has special agro or crowd control rules etc. etc. etc. etc.

      And the fabled social interaction? Get told to prepare for a six hour "quest", spend an hour waiting for people to show up "Is EST central time?" "Forget again! LOL!" and then another hour for them to prepare themselves properly "Soree ever1 SM. LOL. need 2 get my wnad of yeraldo brb" "Need buf str? pls tks xxx". Then ten minutes of "Ready?" "Yep.. no, wait, I need to go potty" and finally you're off - to a world of pain and misery as imbeciles fumble around failing to obey simple instructions. Eventually after another 50 mins you wipe. Three hours wasted to spend three quarters of an hour fighting over a 5% share in imaginary trinkets.

      In /theory/ it could be fun with the right people. In /practice/ everyone I know who has tried it is still looking for those mythical right people. Maybe it's a well kept secret who they are? Meanwhile they're effectively working a day job for free two or three days per week, where the job is "put up with idiots like yourself in an MMORPG".

      Don't get me wrong, the basic running about in groups in a fantasy world killing goblins stuff is fine. But that doesn't require more than an hour or two per day at most, nearly all of it doing something fun, not waiting. I can do waiting in real life.

    13. Re:Governing Gameplay from on high... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I was forced to make my game comply with the laws in China I would just tell people over there to pirate the game and paypal me some money if they feel like it. I suppose though if its a big market there, maybe I (and especialy mega-corps) would be forced to jump through the hoop for the money it could bring.

      I don't like the whole idea of this ovbiously. Not that I don't know people that have been totaly addicted to MMORPG's and I have been pretty addicted to UO myself. The thing is though, I stopped playing them personaly but if someone wants to waste their life playing an ultimately pointless game then they should be able to.

      Oh and the thing about the guy jumping out of the window is classic. I just hope to god his parents don't win!

    14. Re:Governing Gameplay from on high... by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      I work from home now but I had a desk job for 8 months this year [left so I can work from home]. At my desk job it wasn't uncommon to get up every 10-15 mins and take a quick walk around the office to stretch the legs. It meant I could put another hour in the day [or just not be so f'ing bored] it meant I got more done better.

      Yeah some jobs require a lot of attention for long periods of time [e.g. surgery] but most jobs don't. Most people just plomp themselves down for the lengths because they assume that's what expected of them.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    15. Re:Governing Gameplay from on high... by Snaller · · Score: 1

      Obviously people would switch to game 2 while game 1 'recharged'

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  43. Just bought it a few days ago... by zarthrag · · Score: 2, Interesting

    And lo-and-behold the ESRB warns of "Blood, Suggestive Themes, Use of Alcohol, and Violence"/T for Teen... so I guess my 15 month old won't be playing - but she clearly has more sense than their 13yo child: she's terrified of heights.

    --
    Why can't all fpga/microcontroller manufacturers just release free optimizing compilers???
  44. Darwin Awards, here I come by jacklebot · · Score: 1, Troll

    Both parents and kid deserve a darwin award. Kudos to the kid for removing himself from the gene pool

    1. Re:Darwin Awards, here I come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The parents won't get a Darwin Award as long as they are able to reproduce.
      The kid on the other hand...

  45. GOOD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Blizzard should ban all chinese players. That way they avoid lawsuits AND keep out the gold farmers in one fell stroke!

  46. Darwin award flunky by NidStyles · · Score: 0

    It's only a matter of time before people are suing the Darwin awards people for their late family member's not make the list. On-Topic: How in any state of mind can you actually believe that a video game could cause your child to act out some weird disturbing fantasy? I think it's a case of the parents having shoddy genetics in the delusional sense, and passing it onto the child. Then the child grows up with delusions out the wazzo, and ends up being the leading cause for his own death. Maybe the Neo-Cons are right, and we should pray for the appocalypse now. Well at least the gene pool could use a little thinning.

    --
    Yes, I said it.
  47. ahaha by grumpygrodyguy · · Score: 0, Troll

    he parents filed a suit against Blizzard Entertainment on Wednesday, saying their son jumped to his death while reenacting a scene from the game

    Ahahahahaaa!! AHAHAaahahahaha! *breath* Ahahahahaaahahaha!

    --
    The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky
    1. Re:ahaha by HellYeahAutomaton · · Score: 1


      Close, but in sterotypical anime' it's more like a schoolgirl
      covering her mouth going:


      Hiiiihihihiihihiihihihiihihiiiii! *breath* hhihihihiihihihii!*splat*

  48. Civil society in China by Flying+pig · · Score: 1
    I had to check that this really was on mainland China, not Taiwan. It is. Does this mean that China is starting to evolve a civil society with a civil legal system? If so, disregarding all the comments about frivolous lawsuits, this is a very interesting development. The really newsworthy bit would come if an ordinary Chinese was allowed to sue a Chinese corporation rather than a foreign corporation or its local agent. But the journey of a thousand miles begins with a single footstep.

    As for the lawsuit itself, if it succeeds, well there goes just about everything, from Calvin and Hobbes through the Narnia books to the Iliad. Perhaps tort reform should involve the Athenian idea that lawyers bringing frivolous lawsuits should be expelled from society for a period.

    --
    Pining for the fjords
  49. Online game addiction is a serious problem. by sixpacker · · Score: 1

    It's true. I've seen two kinds of oneline game addicts. One is playing online games for money. The other is a simple addict. The former, I guess, is in less dangerous situation since their sole purpose is making money by selling game items. They know when to stop and how to manage themselves.

    But the latter is in quite a dangerous situation. In South Korea, I already read a dozen of newspaper articles reporting a death of a game addict, usually saying "a guy died of heart attack while playing online games for a week without sleep, eating nothing". This might sound funny but this has happened and is still happening.

    --
    Your ego is Matrix!
    1. Re:Online game addiction is a serious problem. by SgtFajita · · Score: 1

      They know when to stop and how to manage themselves.

      That's not an addict as it doesn't involve compulsion. It's habitual only because making money is habitual (you make it to spend it).

      As for South Korea, consider the flipside of their "addiction." People who have convinced themselves that playing a game for 20+ hours straight, in the same position, without eating or sleeping much at all, will not cause them harm. There's a word for that, and it is "stupid." The term "addiction" has been spread so thin it can now apply to any and every activity one can engage in, making it meaningless. Then again, all addictions begin with a conscious decision, so it's your own damn fault no matter how you slice it.

    2. Re:Online game addiction is a serious problem. by GeekDork · · Score: 1
      In South Korea, I already read a dozen of newspaper articles reporting a death of a game addict, usually saying "a guy died of heart attack while playing online games for a week without sleep, eating nothing".

      There are at least two things to say about that.

      First thing, who says that either of those newspapers is writing about a real thing? For all it's worth, they could make that stuff up on end, everywhere on this planet. There's no such thing as reliable news, unless you've seen it yourself and even then it's subjective at best.

      Second thing, if someone is playing online games for a week without sleep or eating something, they have a drug problem! There are very few people who could manage without sleep for a week, especially when they don't eat. It's very easy: your sugar level drops, you get drowsy, you fall unconscious, get to a hospital, get IVs. End of story. So either blame it on the drugs, stupidity or a shitty medical system, but don't blame it on games.

      --

      Fight hunger. Filet a politician and send him to a 3rd world country of your choice.

  50. To that poor kids' parents... by LincolnX · · Score: 1

    Can I have his stuff?

    1. Re:To that poor kids' parents... by cciRRus · · Score: 1

      Like his CD keys?

      --
      w00t
  51. All hail stupidity! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nt

  52. Interesting.. by Maxite · · Score: 1

    This seems highly amusing to me. A kid with no sense of reality. who seems to think that he could survive uninjured from such a fall, decides to make such a jump. The parents decide to sue Blizzard over the game.

    Honestly though, I'd never let any kids I have in the future do anything this dumb though. I'd be sure to make sure that they know the difference between reality and fantasy, and that what they see on TV, movies, and in games isn't always real. However, if any of the kids I have do die in such a manner, I'll be sad yes, but I wouldn't sue the game manufacturer. The blame would rest on me for not looking after my own kid, and also on my kid for beleiving he could do such a thing.

    --
    Ah, you found me!
  53. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  54. Mario by k00110 · · Score: 1

    I wonder when he jumped if he said like Mario "Yahooo".

    1. Re:Mario by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you Tart... the article is not blaming nintendo... /slap, its blaming blizzard... maybe he jumped and said "Long live the forsaken..." or if he was alliance "To Battle!"...

    2. Re:Mario by k00110 · · Score: 1
      you Tart... the article is not blaming nintendo... /slap, its blaming blizzard... maybe he jumped and said "Long live the forsaken..." or if he was alliance "To Battle!"...
      What I said was sarcasm to say that we don't know what other games he played that may have influenced him.
  55. Grief leads people all sorts of places by olivercromwell · · Score: 1

    Hey, grief can do strange things. While I agree that blaming the child's death WoW makes no sense, the parents are grasping for answers. Sure, we can sit back in our armchairs, and ridicule them, accuse them of being bad parents, and in general find ways to lay the blame on them. However, imagine what they are going through. They lost their son, and are seeking meaning. The person we ought to be reserving our anger for is the so called "anti internet activist". Here he comes, and sooths the parents, saying it is not your fault, it is that evil internet, and you can make them pay for what they did to your son. I imagine the parents are not too familiar with the net, so they, their judgement clouded by guilt, sadness, disbelief and anger, accept what this guy says, and they become pawns in HIS crusade. Remember Columbine? It was not that long ago that seemingly intelligent aduylts blamed death metal and FPS games as part of the cause of the massacre. It doesn't make sense to those of us looking in from outside, but it does happen. People always seek reasons why their loved ones die.

    1. Re:Grief leads people all sorts of places by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Couldn't they find some better answer than "My son was too retarded to realize that jumping will hurt"? Being ignorant of what their child is doing (the internet in general even) is exactly what these people are getting ridiculed for. They are being made fun of for not doing what parents are generally supposed to do: watching their damned kids. If they had just looked in on the boy, watched what he was doing for a while, and maybe not smoked so much crack while he was a fetus he would probably still be alive today.

      It's their own damned fault.

  56. Funny WoW Related Pic by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

    I kinda feel bad for mentioning this, considering the context,
    but I just saw this really funny picture over on [H]ardOCP

    For the Horde!!!

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
    1. Re:Funny WoW Related Pic by everphilski · · Score: 1

      so cute!

  57. Tobacco lawsuits? Gun manufacturers by J'raxis · · Score: 2, Interesting
    from the if-you-can-sue-tobacco-companies-why-not dept.

    I would compare this case more to suing gun manufacturers than to suing tobacco companies. In my opinion, the tobacco lawsuits were actually reasonable: People were claiming the tobacco companies actively suppressed research into the addictive and carcinogenic nature of tobacco; thus, people bought the product, got addicted, and came down with cancer, all the while thinking what they were doing was reasonable safe. Thus, there were ample grounds for a lawsuit.

    This case, however, is a lot more like the nonsense over suing gun makers for what criminals do with them, suing bars over deaths caused by drunken drivers, &c. -- someone's just looking to place blame on a tangentially-connected, and -- coincidentally, I'm sure -- well-monied third party.

  58. Re:My epitath by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Among other things, you misspelled epitaph.

    If you're going to post nonsense, at least spell check it first.

  59. United States of China by Xyleene · · Score: 1
    This just in...

    Now that research shows that demographics in both countries are identical, practice has shown that the mentality of parents' in both countries also have very much in comon.

    --
    Give them the illusion of choice and they will blindly follow for they choose not to make one.
    1. Re:United States of China by MayorDefacto · · Score: 1
      Now that research shows that demographics in both countries are identical, practice has shown that the mentality of parents' in both countries also have very much in comon.

      Actually, I think this is more of the same old Chinese party line that the internet is exposing their populace to too many "evil" foreign influences and must be walled off and its use metered. This case has more to do with propaganda than it does parental responsiblity.

  60. Indeed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone somewhere is trying to say, in a not-so-subtle manner, "I damaged your reproductive facilities and yet you, in what could only be described as defiance, engineered a way to fix my "fix" (pun intended all the way) and procreate. Now, I am finishing my intent and removing your genes from the pool you are polluting. Please do not attempt this again, or you yourself will be removed forcibly. Thank you and enjoy your stay."

    Listen, I saw Wiley E. Cyote get electrocuted hundres of ways ... did I test these things with my own finger in a socket or kite on a power line? No, something inside my head, the something that was missing in this kid's head, told me it was best not to do that.

    Hah, the /. word-image for posting says, "saintly" ... lolz.

  61. All I can say is this.... by Marthisdil · · Score: 0

    Parents are responsible for keeping up with their children. I have 2 kids myself. I know what they are doing, what limits to set with what they do, and when they should do something else. If parents think they can just sue someone because THEY weren't responsible enough to pay attention to what their kids were doing, much less where they "learn" the things they do, they are sorely mistaken.

    I hope they get into court, and the judge and jury bitchslap them for being morons, and throws them in jail for contributing to the death of their own child. Maybe then people will wake up and smell the coffee.

  62. in other news by wisdom_brewing · · Score: 1

    shakespeares estate is being sued for causing every death related to failed relationships, loss of authority, those resulting from the acts of monarchs and anything poison related...

  63. Parents? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If only we could sue parents for not tending to their children...

  64. What did the scene itself depict? by rolandog · · Score: 1

    I'd like to see if my version of the scene doesn't end up in death.

  65. Re-enacting Quake by yeremein · · Score: 1

    Then survivors said they knew their idea had gone horribly wrong after seven of their friends were dead. "I kept waiting for Paul and Trevor to respawn, but he just laid there bleeding. That's when I knew we should stop playing. It just wasn't fun after that," said Wilkins.

    Story here.
  66. Last Name FIRST in China by adevadeh · · Score: 1

    anti-Internet addiction advocate Zhang Chunliang. Mr. Chunliang

    NO NO NO it's Mr. Zhang.

    Chinese names go:
    Family name Given name

    We really need to learn at least a little bit about 1/5th of the world's population! The mistake above is like calling the president Mr. George.

    --
    Fancy handmade instruments at The Camel's Back
    1. Re:Last Name FIRST in China by quantum+bit · · Score: 1

      Yeah, come on, didn't they watch Deep Space 9?

  67. Gambling - MMORPG by tehanu · · Score: 1

    In the past, gambling addiction used to be the main bane of Chinese families. Gambling is seen as a relaxing past-time especially for guys and has an aura of danger that many find attractive. Kids get taught how to gamble from a very young age and play with family with pretend money. Working class guys find it a relaxing past time. Old men and women and housewives play mahjong. On the high end you have the romance and danger of the "God of Gamblers", Shanghai and similar environs, and lots of guns and cool guys. Fun for all the family, every sex, every age and every niche of society from high to low.

    So I guess you can say that Chinese do tend to be susceptible to behaviour related addictions. In fact, if what I read about how MMORPGs work is true, there is an element of gambling in it.

    I wonder if in the future gambling will be replaced by MMORPG as the addiction demon that stalks Chinese families...I doubt we'll ever see loan sharks bashing up MMORPG addicts though. Also, I seriously seriously seriously doubt that'd we'll ever have shows about "The God of MMORPG". You know, after watching these Chinese shows romanticising gambling, I have to admit all the kids developed an obsession with card games and card tricks, so I guess it's probably for the best we'll never get "The Shell Game - MMORPG version"...World of Warcraft, Patrick Tse Yin or Chow Yun-Fat, my god, the horror, the horror...

  68. McDonald's Coffee by Pyromage · · Score: 5, Informative

    Mod parent up - more people need to know what happened.

    First, the person burned was the *passenger*. Secondly, the car was stopped at the time for her to put some cream & sugar in it. Third, McDonald's coffee is served 40 degrees hotter than that of other fast food restaurants. The temperature that other restaurants serve it at *would not* cause third degree burns.

    And the very large sum of money that she was awarded initially totalled less than a day's coffee sales for McDonalds. And that was reduced significantly, as well.

    I don't like the comparison, because McDonald's did screw up, and this kid screwed up. Blizzard just made a kickass game.

    1. Re:McDonald's Coffee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Additionally,
              The woman originally contacted MCD's and asked to cover her medical expenses. They said "no".
                Then she found out that she was the 71st lawsuit for coffee burns, some of which were just people sitting at McD's and severely burning their tongues, mouths, throats. Lastly, she sued for the cost of her medical expenses which was like $10-16K do not recall the exact number, the rest of the money awarded was "punitive damages"(amount is relative to the income/worth of the person or corporation being sued)for McDonalds not correcting a known dangerous situation.
              The story gets twisted and used as propaganda all the time by corporate shills who would like to see "tort reform" of "frivilous lawsuits". However the reform is always aimed at removing individuals right to sue and leaving corporations free to bring litigation. And do not forget that 80% of all litigation in the US is corporation against corporation. Hmmmmmm... kinda like the fiscally responsible bankruptcy law just passed, no mention of corporations not being able going bankrupt and being held to the fiscal responsibility of the pension bill - compensation for work that generated the revenue to pay the CEOs their salaries and pensions.

    2. Re:McDonald's Coffee by jadavis · · Score: 1, Informative

      And the very large sum of money that she was awarded initially totalled less than a day's coffee sales for McDonalds.

      Totally irrelevent. Money is money, and it comes straight from the stockholders' pockets. Those stockholders are retirees and so forth; just regular people.

      The thing I don't like about the McDonald's lawsiut is: what if some people like their coffee that hot? It's not totally unreasonable. Some people commute and may like the coffee to stay hot the entire time. Some people just like to sip it slowly. Some people still like it to be hot after they put stuff in the coffee (milk, cream, whatever). Or a combination of these factors.

      Should it be illegal to sell coffee to meet the needs of those people? A few people avoid burns, millions of people suffer from lukewarm coffee. It's clearly called "hot coffee". I can't think of any warning that would be helpful beyond that. If it said "this coffee could cause 3rd degree burns, be careful" I don't think that would make any difference at all to the consumers' coffee habbits.

      What's next? Sue a microwave manufacturer because "who would guess water could get that hot in just one minute?"? There are millions of products that you have to be careful with.

      --
      Social scientists are inspired by theories; scientists are humbled by facts.
    3. Re:McDonald's Coffee by powerlinekid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ...

      Did you even read what they said?

      Mcdonalds lost the case because the coffee was not safe for consumption. The coffee caused 3rd degree burns. Who would want to drink something that did that? Even if you wanted to, you still could not without a hospital trip. So yes, its totally unreasonable to sell a drink made to be consumed and have it be not safe. I mean... maybe some people like to drink draino right? I should be able to sell it at bars...

      Your comment is among the stupidest things I've ever read on Slashdot. Congratulations.

      --

      can't sleep slashdot will eat me
    4. Re:McDonald's Coffee by MoaDweeb · · Score: 2, Informative

      Please understand that the reason the coffee was so hot was that they could use a lower grade of bean and the taste would be disguised. Evidence was also presented that Maccas had also done a risk/ reward analysis for this and decided that the amount of money saved was greater than that would be spent on lawsuits.

      --
      New Zealanders are well balanced with a chip on each shoulder. One represents Australia, the other the rest of the world
    5. Re:McDonald's Coffee by jadavis · · Score: 1

      Even if you wanted to, you still could not without a hospital trip.

      Then how did so many millions of people drink the coffee and then be happy enough to go back and buy it again? To say that some hot coffee, which was still less than boiling, is as unsafe as drano is rediculous.

      I notice that you totally ignored my very plausible reasons that people may have to want hotter coffee. Some people let their food cool down a little bit before eating it. That's just common sense. Some people add cream/milk, which could bring the temperature too low unless it started off "too hot". Some people just like the pleasure of smelling hot coffee/tea until it's cool enough to drink.

      Remember that many things you cook at home use boiling water, which is hotter than the coffee you speak of. It's still common to serve the food immediately, at which point people might wait for it too cool by starting on another course of the meal.

      --
      Social scientists are inspired by theories; scientists are humbled by facts.
    6. Re:McDonald's Coffee by twistedcain · · Score: 1

      I took a few civil law classes and we discussed this case. I'm not going to be 100% correct on the details but reading others posts helped jog my memory.

      There were guidelines on the books somewhere for food consumption and McDonalds was overheating the coffee so they could use cheaper beans and hide the bad taste. They were warned or fined previously to this, if I recall. When the lady spilled her cup of coffee, her legs and genitals recieved 3rd degree burns and the hospital/recovery came to around $110,000. She sued mickey d's and was awarded a settlement of around a million dollars.

      The media had a field day and ran headlines across the country. McDonalds saw the settlement as unreasonable and appealed the case. Anyway, in the end, she was awarded the ~$110,000 to pay all her bills and thats it. The media steered clear of the overturned million dollar verdict. Most appeals where the original outlandish settlement is overturned is never talked about in the media.

    7. Re:McDonald's Coffee by instarx · · Score: 1

      The media steered clear of the overturned million dollar verdict. Most appeals where the original outlandish settlement is overturned is never talked about in the media.

      I don't think a million was outlandish at all. The only thing corporations understand is money. That was well demonstrated by the fact they had been previously cited for dangerous too-hot coffee and had ignored the citations.

      Even a million dollars was not enough in my opinion because in the end it was the bad PR that made McDonalds fix the problem, not the judgement itself. We should be able to use the courts to get corporations to change their bad ways and not have to rely on the randomness of bad press.

    8. Re:McDonald's Coffee by catch23 · · Score: 1

      Your refusal to understand the parent's comment is just amazing. Do you know the reason why McDonalds makes the coffee so hot? because it costs money to put a thermometer in the coffee maker. Also, it's faster to just boil the water instead of actually warming the water to the specified coffee temperature. People do not want hotter coffee, plus when it is too hot, it destroys the flavor of coffee which is the reason why coffee must be made at a certain temperature. Have you seen water boil in standard coffee machines? of course not...

      Have you ever considered that a slashdot comment might actually have some truth to it?

    9. Re:McDonald's Coffee by F_Scentura · · Score: 1

      "Then how did so many millions of people drink the coffee and then be happy enough to go back and buy it again?"

      Millions of people do, but an unsafe number of them end up like that lady, as McDonalds had been warned by the court on other occasions to lower the temperature of their coffee. They ignored the court, and the court saw fit to progress after the company did not act in good faith.

    10. Re:McDonald's Coffee by jadavis · · Score: 1

      That comment was in response to someone who claimed that one could not drink McDonald's coffee without a trip to the hospital. His comment was simply untrue, and my response was a valid one.

      --
      Social scientists are inspired by theories; scientists are humbled by facts.
    11. Re:McDonald's Coffee by jadavis · · Score: 1

      I understand exactly what the parent was saying. You seem to be saying that nobody wants hot coffee, with absolutely no evidence. My evidence that people did want hot coffee is that millions purchased it and went back for more. I'm not saying it's high-quality coffee, but it does meet many people's needs. And who are you to tell people that they don't want hot coffee if they do want hot coffee?

      --
      Social scientists are inspired by theories; scientists are humbled by facts.
    12. Re:McDonald's Coffee by danila · · Score: 1

      People may not want hot coffee, because it is impossible to drink boiling water. Every customer who buys the coffee served at that temperature has to wait for it to cool down, otherwise the insides of the mouth would be burned and they would have to go to a hospital. This isn't a matter of taste, this is a matter of boiling water causing burns. If you don't believe me, please go ahead and drink some 90-degree (that's Celsius) water. Please have someone nearby to call 911 (you may not be able to say anything afterwards) and please report back to us.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    13. Re:McDonald's Coffee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're full of shit
      the coffee was not hotter
      for one, how would they even be able to prove that? the coffee was gone and a BIT cold by case time

      2nd, 40 degrees hotter will NOT cause 3rd degree burns you friggen idiot. that would take being burned (badly) by a fire for longer than she was burned by the damn coffee

  69. Toy Company Should Sue Parents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Truely. Because the parents of these three kids plainly weren't watching what their kids were doing, and not teaching them the difference between fantasy and reality. Where is the parent's responsibilty? Where was the guiding hand?

    What happened with these kids isn't the fault of the toy being played with in a proper manner, its because they were 1) not old enough to understand the difference between fantasy and reality and needed more parent involvment to watch over them, 2) not mentally stable enough to understand, which good parents should have been able to pick up on themselves or should have been pointed out to the parents by a daycare, if used, or an education institution, which should have indicated to the parents the toy was inapropriate to begin with, 3) they weren't watch because the parents didn't care what the child played with, such as a hammer (could of been a sharp kitchen knife), and/or 4) was old enough they should of understood the difference between fantasy and reality but wasn't paid enough attention to by the parents to teach them the difference.

    The toy company now loses a product line and the profits from that line, as well as losing money on a product recall which shouldn't have to be done if the parents were actually doing their job to begin with. This action doesn't only effect the company but also its employees. Could there be lose of jobs because of unneeded expenditures or the loss of profits not to mention the fun of kids that have been properly raised and taught. Many people and kids are getting punished for the misuse and inproper use of three kids that weren't properly supervised and/or taught.

    The state(s) in which the parents reside should investigate and possibly sue the parents for child endangerment.

    The toy company should sue the parents for the losses they encur, both for their employees and for the good kids that lose out because of what has happened.

    1. Re:Toy Company Should Sue Parents by syukton · · Score: 1

      Um. The Onion is a satirical publication.

      Good thing you posted AC.

      --
      Reinvent the wheel only at either a lower cost, greater effectiveness, or your own personal enrichment and satisfaction.
    2. Re:Toy Company Should Sue Parents by PunkOfLinux · · Score: 1

      But his point IS still valid.

  70. Playboy sued for giving me carpal tunnel! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was walking around a few weeks ago and I saw a brick hanging off the edge of a building. I figured if I jumped up and hit it with my head, that I'd get a mushroom. Instead, all I got was a painful welt. Who can I sue for that?

  71. Aww, what about the Chinese kid power-levelers?? by SMS_Design · · Score: 1

    But that would KILL the supply of cheap labor for Chinese kids power-leveling WoW characters. Seriously. You can pay to have a kid log onto your character and advance it hella-fast. They also tend to sell a lot of gold.

  72. Blizzard Sued for death of gamer. by jmalin77 · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one who thinks this is utterly ridiculous? Maybe instead of suing a company that had nothing to do with the death, the parents should go take some classes on how to be PARENTS?

    1. Re:Blizzard Sued for death of gamer. by SgtFajita · · Score: 1

      Am I the only one who thinks this is utterly ridiculous?

      Aside from the first 300+ comments? Then, yes.

      And thanks for not spelling it "rediculous."

    2. Re:Blizzard Sued for death of gamer. by Nivoset · · Score: 1

      dont need to, probably only had the one kid.

      --
      Movies made by a crazy person

      http://www.youtube.com/marginalpro
  73. You're missing the forset for the trees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The real issue here isn't about games, it's about basic human freedoms.

    I'm sure the average slashdotter is familiar with the Chinese governments love to the internet and student demonstrations. Students who wanted more freedom decide they had enough and made this big protest in Tiananmen square. Now the same age group is hanging around in cyber cafes to play world of warcraft, among other MMORPGs. When young kids get together they talk, even if their playing games, in an oppressive regime that's dangerous. So the government is breaking up these social breeding grounds. Their being smart about it though and hiding it the anti-gaming sentiment that's playing out in the western world. THIS IS A SMOKE SCREEN. More often than not the western media is missing the point I think.

  74. how pathetic by xxdesmus · · Score: 1

    How pathetic is this. Would you like Blizzard to take care of raising your kids as well? If you can't raise your kids and take care of your kids well enough that they don't go jumping out of windows then you don't deserve kids. If your kid is dumb enough to kill themself because of a game than I say survival of the fittest...and your kid must have been pretty dumb and unfit.

  75. Thinning the herd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is survival of the fittest, and hell there are already too many Chinese people walking around.

    Warcraft is fun for a while, but it gets old fast. But I guess games are as addicting to me. I am a notch above that on the evolutionary chart.

  76. Re:An interesting letter from a parent by Dufftron+9000 · · Score: 1

    The kid was dumb not a killer. So it would be The suicidal little bastard's parents.

  77. May have some merit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My gut reaction is that it's pretty silly... but then I remembered a couple times where I think my mind was left pretty warped after playing games for way too long.

    In class once after an all-night Jedi Knight LAN party once, I dropped a pencil and my first thought was to hit the F2 key to force-pull it back. That was weird... but probably as much because of lack of sleep as anything else.

    The second struck me as much more serious. As a druid in WoW, I liked to get around in Stormwind by going sealion form in the moats. Usually I run out of a building and jump right off the edge into the water. One day I came out of a RL building on campus where there's a terrace, and for a few seconds it seemed totally logical that I should launch myself over the edge to get where I was going faster. It was really scary when I realized that I was seriously considering it, and would have fallen two stories or so. I stopped playing WoW shortly after.

    That's not to say that Lucasarts or Blizzard are necessarily at fault. I was probably playing the games far more than was healthy. But I like to think that I'm not weak-minded... surely other people have had experiences like this. Right? ...right? :)

  78. Parent Responsibilty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe before a parent can sue someone for something that happens to their kids, maybe the parents should be investigated to see if they were being responsible parents. Did they pay enough attention to the child? Were they involved in his/her life to know what was going on? Did they know what is actions were like outside of the house? Did they teach their child the difference between reality and fantasy? Did they know if the child knew the difference? Did they know what the game, their child was playing, was about and if they didn't approve of the game, why did they let him/her play it?

    Don't blame and try to profit from others when the fault might just lie at home.

  79. China is quickly "developing"... by mi · · Score: 1

    Is Mr. Zhang Chunliang much different from Mr. Jack Thompson?

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  80. suk mi deeck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    spel chek thsi beeyoooutch!

  81. Jumped to his death? by bombshelter13 · · Score: 1

    He 'jumped to his death while reenacting a scene from the game'? I play World of Warcraft, and you know what we call people who jump of cliffs and kill themselves? Idiots. Or 'N00bs', if we're feeling a bit less mean-spirited. This guy obviously had no clue what he was doing, and if he played the game, he most likely played it very poorly and didn't really understand the entire concept too well. I hardly think he's a very good example of the typical World of Warcraft player.

  82. Reality is like a video game... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reality is just like a video game, except you only get one life!

  83. My guess is, by jointm1k · · Score: 1

    That kid forgot to stock up on light feathers, which are used as a reagent for the slow fall spell.

    --
    You know it makes sense, a little reminder from jointm1k.
  84. Monkey corollary by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

    Monkey See, Monkey Do

    leads to

    Monkey See, Monkey Sue.

  85. Star Wars Galaxies had fatigue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Star Wars Galaxies had fatigue. It worked great. Until you had people whine about it and it got dropped to do nothing. Then simply removed from the game.

  86. Is this our fault? by runcible · · Score: 1

    Did we export the culture of human irresponsibility along with the rest of our culture, or is this human nature?

    --
    remember the wisdom of Mahatma Gandhi: If enough peasants die horribly, someone will probably notice
  87. The Difference? by Siffy · · Score: 1

    When you fall and crater in video games your screen tints red. But if your character held up a small sign that read "Ouch!", you'd know not to do that.

  88. maybe the kid just fell? by dindi · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I am surprised no typical /. conspiracy theorists did not bring that up.

    Would you consider tha chance that the kid was totally normal, and simply fell out of the window? Than the parents are just trying to make a buck ?

    OR:

    How did the parents know that he was "re-enacting" a scene from the game? Were THEY playing the game and the kid just watched?

    Now if they saw or played the game, they should have realised that it was dangerous and just forbid the kid to play it. I have motorbikes, quads, drill machines and whatever else dangerous stuff, if I know it is dangerous I do not let my kid play with it, simple like that. If I do fail so it is my responsibility.

    This is just another retarded case of let's blame games practice.

    How many people sued the makers of superman ? Or mary poppins? I mean I knew a kid who broke both her arms trying to parachute with an umrella. She landed in front of our garage entrance in fact. She was stupid but not stupid enought to make 1st jump from the 3rd floor, and the first floor jump did not kill her.

    Now I ask again: why not sue movies? I mean how many kids movies feature people flying, shooting, killing. Or how many homes are without a channel blovking device with password control for non-suitable content?

    It is a joke. Kids see more violence on a day staying home and watching TV that I can experience playing grand theft auto for hours.

    1. Re:maybe the kid just fell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > How did the parents know that he was "re-enacting" a scene from the game?

      The fact that his last words were LEEEEROY JENKINS?

    2. Re:maybe the kid just fell? by fabioaquotte · · Score: 1

      I am surprised no typical /. conspiracy theorists did not bring that up.

      Would you consider tha chance that the kid was totally normal, and simply fell out of the window? Than the parents are just trying to make a buck ?

      OR:

      How did the parents know that he was "re-enacting" a scene from the game? Were THEY playing the game and the kid just watched?

      OR:

      The parents are Everquest players looking to destroy WoW, so they threw their kit out the window and blamed WoW for it!

      --
      Fabio Aquotte
    3. Re:maybe the kid just fell? by BaudKarma · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that was my first thought. Even if the kid did jump, how do we know it was something inspired by WoW, and not just a plain 'ol suicide?

      I can understand why the parents would sue... not for the money, but in an attempt to fix the blame on something/someone other then themselves. We're not bad parents, this video game is what caused our child to jump!

      --
      It's the land of the brave, and the home of the free
      Where the less you know, the better off you'll be.
  89. Re:An interesting letter from a parent by v1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I totally agree. There are two basic related disfunctions in society today. First are the people that are blaming the rest of the world for the results of their bad decisions. Second are the friends and relatives of the first group that got themselves killed as a result of their own poor decisions - they're blaming anyone that was even remotely connected to the deceased as somehow being responsible for their death. People need to take respsonsibility for their actions, and they need to accept that decisions made by others were their responsibility. The whole world is not made for your benefit and protection, and the whole world is not responsible when you screw up. Take ownership of your actions.

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  90. Re:An interesting letter from a parent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are confusing something here. Blood, gore and violance are OK on TV. It is a naked boobie or ass that has to be merciless banned.

  91. In China! by evilneko · · Score: 1

    Evidently, you can. :^(


    Yes, in China! ...I didn't know they had these kinds of bleeding hearts there...

    --
    Slashdot - where to disagree, is to be a troll
    1. Re:In China! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not just in China. Take a look at the gun companies being sued because some criminal stole a gun and used it to kill someone. Next thing you'll see bottomfeeder lawyers suing car companies over drunk drivers.

  92. Everyone knows... by squidsoup · · Score: 1

    that you need to blink before hitting the ground to mitigate damage.

  93. Wow... by Ricken · · Score: 1

    That's like suing the rail-road company because their son stepped in front of a train. Geez.

  94. Below the Root by suso · · Score: 1

    Actually, I wonder if any kids ever died while trying to leap out of trees using bedsheets as a shuba, like in the old game Below the Root. Now that would be ironic. One of the best non-violent video games of all time, getting blammed for causing kids to kill themselves.

    If you don't know what I'm talking about, download the Vice C64 emulator right now and cruise on over to c64.com to download the game. Its worth a week of your time. I always wish someone would do a remake.

    1. Re:Below the Root by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Actually, I wonder if any kids ever died while trying to leap out of trees using bedsheets as a shuba, like in the old game Below the Root.

      Come on, jumping off the roof with a bedsheet is almost a cliche. I'm pretty sure it predates video games.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
  95. It was Guns... by erica_ann · · Score: 1

    Now it is "Games Don't Kill People, People Kill People"

  96. That's interesting because by Jack+Earl · · Score: 1
    We have a word for kids like that in my neighbordhood.

    Shitheads.

  97. Times change....people don't by SilverJets · · Score: 1

    Sounds like the problems in the 80's for Dungeons and Dragons. Parents trying to blame their kids' suicides on a game. Which also sounds like all the uproar over heavy metal music..."Playing the record backwards you can hear Satan. The music is making these kids be violent and do drugs and commit suicide."

    The times have changed but people have just found new things to blame for their problems. No one takes personal responsibility any more.

  98. Obligatory by MikeSty · · Score: 0

    Chinese Kid: "leeeeeeeeeeeeeeeroooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo ooooy JEEEEEEEEENNNNNNNNNNNNNKINNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN NNNNNS!" /jump

  99. Test of Faith quest by Mustang+Matt · · Score: 1

    I think it's only appropriate to post the quest he must have been reenacting.

    http://thottbot.org/?qu=1149

    I can't think of any others that have you jump from a cliff. They might as well sue the Tauren that told him to jump while they're at it.

    --
    The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
    1. Re:Test of Faith quest by tuxedobob · · Score: 1

      Thanks! I was actually wondering what quest it was.

      Dammit, where are my mod points?

  100. Level? by trollable · · Score: 2, Funny

    What was his level? Because, even in WoW, you die when you jump from a 60m-high tower. Sad anyway.

  101. Hey, look... by Fordiman · · Score: 1

    A Chinese translation for the words "Jack" and "Thompson"

    --
    110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
  102. And in related news by Stevyn · · Score: 1

    3 crackheads down the street who started their life long pursuit of illegal drugs eating magic mushrooms has sued Nintendo. They claim years of playing Super Mario Brothers in their mom's basement restructured their minds to make them addicted to mushrooms. They are also considering filing lawsuits because their pyromania stems from what they call, "a life of throwing fireballs at their enemies."

    Nintendo could not be reached for comment as they were too busy wondering what the fuck is wrong with this world.

  103. Well That's the Point, Isn't It? by Greyfox · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    If they don't find someone else to blame, they'll have to blame themselves. And we're talking China here, too. Unless they can distract their repressive communist government by pointing the finger of blame elsewhere, the government might decide that it is, in fact, their fault and treat them accordingly. Now MY fascist regime would respond by pointing out that pointing out that the manner of their child's death and subsequent completely retarded lawsuit against a third party indicates that I don't want any combination of their genetic material in my country and then permanently revoking their breeding license. Though in all liklihood they would never have got one in the first place in MY regime. I suppose that China's repressive communist government is probably somewhat nicer than I am...

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  104. Geronimooooo! by simpleguy · · Score: 1

    Somewhere... someone was on the way down screaming Leeeroyyyy Jenkiinnssss

  105. Yeah. by John+Pfeiffer · · Score: 1
    The parents filed a suit against Blizzard Entertainment on Wednesday, saying their son jumped to his death while reenacting a scene from the game, the report said.


    Yeah, right. Because we all know there's a lot of cordless bungie-jumping in World of Warcraft. It's a goddamned epidemic I say.

    I have always been an advocate of taking the warning labels off of everything, abolishing bullshit lawsuits, and letting natural selection run its course. Some people are too stupid, or too damned messed up, to live. That's just a fact of life.
    --

    Friend: "The NIC is misconfigured..." Me: "No prob, I'll just telnet in and fix it." *Silence*
  106. It's never YOUR fault, is it? by aurifex · · Score: 0

    Oh of course not. It's never the parents fault for neglecting their kid, then acting dumbfounded when they submerse themselves in an alternate reality to get away from the crappy life you've given them.

    Ok, to be fair, there's actually 2 possible reasons why the kid did what he did.

    1: You're bad parents
    2: Your kid (was) a moron.

    Christ almighty, I'm getting sick of these lawsuits.

  107. Damn Chinese by Perp+Atuitie · · Score: 2, Insightful

    rip off yet another American invention. "For the Children" is OUR excuse for spreading fascism. We invented it, we use it constantly, we depend upon it. Go make your own, dammit.

  108. I am addicted to anti-Internet! by kronocide · · Score: 1

    Anti-Internet is cooler! All bow to Zhang Chunliang, the advocate of anti-Internet addiction!

  109. Natural Selection in Action by corngrower · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sounds like the boy is a candidate for a Darwin Award.

  110. Oh? Which part? by sexysasian · · Score: 0

    I'd like to know exactly what part of the game he was re-enacting. The part where even my UNDEAD MAGE dies from jumping off cliff? Pfft.

  111. Re:An interesting letter from a parent by Scrameustache · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Personally, I approve of the controls on selling violent games to minors.
    [...]
    Do we really want liability for companies who make violent movies?


    There's a thing about US cartoons that has been annoying me for years.
    There seems to be a law that no real guns should ever be shown in kid's show (remember how G.I. Joe and Cobra used to shoot lasers out of their M16s and AK47s?), that a hero on a motorcycle shoud ALWAYS wear a helmet (wolverine with a helmet, or worse, spiderman, gets on a hog, pulls a helmet out of his ass, puts it on, and when he jumps off the bike to start freefalling off tall buildings while being shot at with heat seeking missiles, THEN he takes off the helmet!), or the worse: THE WORST of all: No consequences. Ever.

    When G.I. Joe's army is shooting at Cobra's army, from 15 feet away, with automatic weapons, NO ONE EVER GETS HURT.

    This is dangerous. Much more dangerous than watching violence: It's watching violence without consequences.
    I'm sure this comes from the "thik of the children!" censorship mentality: That watching violence would breed violence (hit: Being the victim of violence is what makes you violent, duh). And it's counter-productive. It does not a dress the real cause, but it creates a sense that vilence has no consequences. That's scary wrong.

    The old japanese anime show would have deaths... watch UFO Robot Grandizer: When the giant robots fight in a city, people die! Children are orphaned!
    But never in a US show: No consequences. And less and less in jap shows, since their market extends to the states now, they're starting to censor at creation rather than let the maniac censors of america butcher their shows when they're sold overseas (like that is gonna stop 'em... check out gamepolitics.com for Jack Thompson's stance on japanese culture corrupting American Youth).

    In fact, if you can ever get your hand on the Earthworm Jim cartoon plot episode, they do a great joke on this (jim throws a were-puppy monster at a bus full of orphans, and then draws attention to the fact that none of the kids were hurt).

    Stop treating kids as if they were stupid: They are young, ignorant, not necessarily stupid (although, obviously, some are). Teach them that violence makes victims, not that violence has no consequences. Stop trying to shield them from the reality of the world, because the world isn't as safe as you'd like to pretend it is, and it will hit them hard if they are unprepared.

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  112. Can't Handle Freedom by mattwarden · · Score: 1

    I consider this further evidence that some people can't handle a free (virtual) market.

  113. Wait a minute?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you jump off a high place in WoW don't you take damage?

  114. Re:tobacco by McGiraf · · Score: 1

    They got sued because they deliberately made their product more adictive.

  115. Natural selection is not so easy by RedLaggedTeut · · Score: 1

    There all kinds of ways in which a vivid imagination can be a boon, so it is quite a hard task for evolution to sort out one trait while keeping the other.

    The problem of virtual experiences that cannot be reenacted is a somewhat new one. And how do you know evolution won't select for parents who sue the creator of such games =)

    Did someone submit the kid to Darwin Awards yet?

    --
    I'm still trying to figure out what people mean by 'social skills' here.
    1. Re:Natural selection is not so easy by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      The problem of virtual experiences that cannot be reenacted is a somewhat new one.

      Well, except for books. I'm sure Heinlein wrote a bunch of stuff that would kill you if you tried it.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    2. Re:Natural selection is not so easy by RedLaggedTeut · · Score: 1

      The problem of virtual experiences that cannot be reenacted is a somewhat new one.

      Well, except for books. I'm sure Heinlein wrote a bunch of stuff that would kill you if you tried it.

      Oh, don't worry, I'll lop a grenade before I jump into the trench.

      --
      I'm still trying to figure out what people mean by 'social skills' here.
    3. Re:Natural selection is not so easy by indigoid · · Score: 1

      I'm sure Heinlein wrote a bunch of stuff that would kill you if you tried it.

      for example

      - travelling back in time and going for a drive with your mother while the younger version of you watches from the back seat
      - your mother getting very randy
      - having sex with your own mother

      not sure if it'd kill you, but it's fairly warped

      --
      P-plate adventurer
  116. Perhaps more importantly. . . by NetRAVEN5000 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    "their son jumped to his death while reenacting a scene from the game"

    . . . umm, okay . . .

    Now I've never actually played WoW, but from what I hear it's entirely online, meaning that Blizzard didn't create this scene, the child himself did.

  117. That is not true though? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WoW has a much easier levelling curve than most other MMORPGs, including all the popular ones that came before it (except maybe CoH?)

    Anybody can get a character to 60 in WoW in 200 hours of play, something which is not even *close* to true of games like EverQuest.

    People play the game not just because it's addictive, but because it's *fun*. You get to interact with hundreds of other people in a fantasy world, raid dungeons in small groups (5) or large groups (20 or 40), and do all sorts of fantastic stuff.

    To compare this to something like drug addiction or tobacco addiction is misleading. MMORPGs don't have nearly the bad health effects of those other addictions. They promote social interaction too (over the internet). Most people who play MMORPGs spend at least some of their play time grouped with their real-world friends.

    MMORPGs have redeeming value in that they offer experiences which you can't get in the real world. When was the last time *you* went and killed a giant dragon with 6 of your friends? Just like movies, they offer temporary escape and fantasy fulfillment, but they also offer a larger social context in which you can make friends, interact with (or battle against!) other people you've never met before, get into casual (pick-up) groups with random people, and generally do lots of fun stuff.

    Frankly it baffles me that people would rather lie around and watch TV, or go down to the mall and sit there yapping with their friends, when they could be doing something *interesting* like playing MMORPGs. If MMORPGs are "addictive" then you must concede that not all addictions are bad. Its cheap entertainment too, a month's subscription to a MMORPG usually costs less than ticket and popcorn for one 2-hour movie, and most people will get 20 hours or more out of that subscription each month.

  118. Common Sense by Gibb34 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ok kiddies, listen up: 1. You can not fly. Not possible. You do not have hollow bones. You can not use wax to make wings. They will not work. 2. Television/Video Games are a made up environment for the people that can handle it. If you think you can go into your school with a bomb/gun thinking the when it goes off, everyone will magically reappear, then you are wrong. Entirely. You will kill people. And they will never come back. Ever. 3. Cops will chase you if you go 200 mph on the freeway. You will go to jail. 4. If you jump off of a three story building, then you will most likeley get hurt very badly, and/or die. Ok, Next. Lets adress the parents: As adressed to the *cough-cough UNSUPERVISED CHILDREN cough-cough* Video games are fake. If your child can not handle the complex ideas in a video game about killing someone and not being able to do the same in real life, then that child does not need to play the game. Folks, it's all about parents paying attention to their kids. Of course, if your kid goes and jumps off a cliff because he did it in a video game, that means the parents are either not watching what their kids play/do. OR the parents think their child can handle it when they can't. Oh, and don't blame it on the company that made the game. Specific laws are set so that you can see what the content of the game is before your kids see it. ESRB baby, ESRB. Same goes with childs toys. Warning lables say wether or not supervision is needed, and if there is or isn't any small and swallowable parts in the toy. Even movies! They have very clear ratings that say if it is or isn't appropriate. And besides that, use freakin common sense.

  119. Dude, that would be awesome by E8086 · · Score: 1

    Chances are if someone is going to do something with an item and you hear that phrase it's a bad idea and someone should stop them before someone gets hurt/killed.
    And "Parental supervision required" is not a suggestion and people are responsible for their own action. If some kid dies from doing something the rest of the world considers dumb the state should sue the parents. If a kid drowns in a bucket or a (home)pool, it's not the bucket or pool maker's fault, it's the fault of whoever should have been watching the kid. You might be able to sue an Internet Cafe owner if someone dies after playing for 50hrs without a break, they can cover themselves from any denial of service attacks/suits with a couple limit of 4hrs signs.
    This article is talking about kids, it's their parents who are responsible for their well being, NOT the tv. GTA is rated M, if you buy it for your 13yr old, you're asking for trouble. Anything in excess is a bad thing, if your kid wants to play a game 15hrs a day, it's time to get them a football or model rocket kit w/ FAA permit.

    --
    F7 doesn't work, ignore spelling and grammar
  120. Also, Bill Gates in DOOM with a trenchcoat... by antdude · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... when Bill Gates was talking about games, DirectX, and DOOM. See the video clips of it on AQFL. Notice he has a trenchcoat too. This presentation was way before the movie and tragic event.

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  121. Re:tobacco by Gravedigger3 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    and WoW doesn't?

    Dont get me wrong this kid was a damn idiot and I agree with all the above comments. But you have to admit that WoW is a very addictive game and I'm sure Blizzard have, and will continue, to make the game as addicting as possible.

    But this doesn't sound like a case of addiction. this sounds like a moron kid reenacting something he saw in a video game. He may very well have been reenacting something he saw in 1 of a million movies, tv shows, or books. This kid was 13 years old. I dont know about China but here in the US 13 year olds know that when you jump from a high place you get hurt or die; i think video games and movies have taught me that lesson better than anything.

    --
    All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be. -PF
  122. Game suggestion for addictive kids by goobster · · Score: 1

    It's a "Jump to Conclusions mat". You see, you have this mat, with different CONCLUSIONS written on it that you could JUMP TO.

  123. What scene? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can anyone tell me what 'scene' he was recreating? The cinematic stops just short of depicting a druid jumping over a waterfall. Otherwise, I cannot think of any in-game event that demonstrates jumping from a great height.

    Priests, mages, and engineers are given spells and gadgets to slow their fall, but the game never actively encourages anyone to jump. If anything, these powers combined with falling damage should discourage kids from dangerous leaps.

  124. Just to be clear.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    There is no such thing as an addictive personality. The mechanisms for addiction (ie, DOPAMINE RECEPTORS) exist in everyone's brain; it's just a matter of finding something that helps you cope, and then abusing it. You, too, will be addicted, easy as pie.

  125. I'll bet this kid... by Khyber · · Score: 1

    thought he had the Sony Rootkit installed, so he could cheat "The Warden" and henceforth, cheat death.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  126. Re:tobacco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    and WoW doesn't?


    If you don't see the difference between doping nicotine with substances meant to enhance addiction and have a very playable game then you're an idiot. What the fuck do you think they're doing, dropping subliminal messages into WoW?
  127. How do they know? by phorm · · Score: 1

    What I wonder is how they know that the kid was reenacting a scene from the game. I mean, was the kid dressed up in a fricking elf suit with feathers pasted to his arms or something like that? Did they sit and watch while he said "look mom, I'm a harpy" and jumped off an embankment.

    If one of your kids pulls a glock out of dad's sock drawer and shoots the other while pretending to be "John Wayne" do they sue the makers of "stagecoach."


    Darwin never counted on the lawyers...

  128. Only 13? isn't that a ToS violation? by qyiet · · Score: 1

    I had trouble finding the Terms of Service for World of Warcraft to reference them. But I actually read it when I installed it, and I'm sure that it had an age requirement of 18 to play.

    So how could blizzard be held reponsable for someone using their product in a way that was not intended hurting themselves?

  129. Re: Blizzard Sued for Death of Gamer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't wish to sound cruel but what was stopping the parents, at any time confiscating the game from their 13-year-old boy. Does the concept of personal responsibility not function anymore.

  130. geez... by kavau · · Score: 2, Funny
    In other news:

    Boy drowns while trying to walk on water; parents sue God.

  131. About Friggin Time..... by rm69990 · · Score: 1

    It's about friggin time these parents get off their lazy asses and take matters into their own hands, instead of not properly taking care of their kids and then crying the blues and sueing left right and center when something bad happens. As far as I'm concerned, these morons killed their own kids through shitty parenting.

  132. WoW Farmer Death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The kid most likely worked for a farming agency (yantis etc) and the parents are really pissed about the loss of income.
    Sad but true.
    Kung Pao!

  133. Retarded precedent by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

    Stupid people should not be playing video games, the same way they shouldn't be allowed to have guns etc. If a stupid person gets hold of a gun no-one blames the manufacturer!

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  134. And the good side? by thesnarky1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    At least now I know how to spell Jack Thompson in Chinese!

  135. Hot Coffee by Fjacky66 · · Score: 1

    I saw hot coffee and now i got a kid on the way I WHANTA SUE!!!!!!

  136. Fatigue technique by geneing · · Score: 1
    I think this is a good idea - adding a limit on how long you can play per day. I don't play much these days, but from time to time I would get a game and spend way too much time playing it. Staying up until 4 am, when I have a meeting the next day is not good. Fortunately this happens only once or twice a year.

    I wish there was a setting when installing a game that would limit the number of hours it would let me play. Sometimes I need help too :)

  137. "Scene"!? by webrunner · · Score: 1

    There aren't actually 'scenes' in World of Warcraft, it's an mmorpg. The only thing I can think of is the window to Molten Core (which you dont have to use any more) but then this person would have to be functional enough to be in a level 60 raid guild

    --
    ADVENTURERS! - ANTIHERO FOR HIRE - CARDMASTER CONFLICT
  138. I can see the letter from the lawyer now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dear Blizzard,

    I'm sorry, but your game is just TOO good. Please stop being so awesome.

    3,
    Chinese Lawyer Dude.

  139. This won't go far with the Blizzard ToS by Gyorg_Lavode · · Score: 2, Interesting
    From the Blizzard Terms of Use:

    1. Establishment of a World of Warcraft Account.
    A. You may establish one (1) user acount (the "Account") with which to play World of Warcraft by accessing the Service pursuant to the terms, conditions and restrictions contained in the Agreement. In order to establish an Account, you must be a 'Natural Person,' who is the age of majority in the country where you are a citizen. Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, partnerships, or any other form of legal entity other than that of a "natural person" may not establish an account, and by accepting this Agreement, you hereby represent and warrant that you meet these eligibility requirements. You may not share the Account with anyone except that if you are a parent or guardian, you may permit one (1) minor child to use the Account when not in use by you. You are liable for all uses of the Account. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, you acknowledge and agree that you shall have no ownershiup or other property interest in the Account, and you further acknowledge and agree that all rights in and to the Account are and shall forever be owned by Blizzard Entertainment.
    While the legality of such an agreement is obviously questionable, the agreement seems to put liability squarely on the parent who registered the account.

    (If you want to read some other crazy stuff. Read the entire ToS. Its damn scary. I wouldn't be supprised if they showed up wanting my first born.)

    --
    I do security
    1. Re:This won't go far with the Blizzard ToS by flibuste · · Score: 1

      This happened in China. Do you honestly think the same EULA applies?

    2. Re:This won't go far with the Blizzard ToS by Gyorg_Lavode · · Score: 1

      Do you think that the people in China don't agree to a legally equivalent EULA? Additionally did you read my caveat about the legal strength of the ToS?

      --
      I do security
    3. Re:This won't go far with the Blizzard ToS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why should it be different for the Chinese? Because they're chinese they can blame others for their own actions instead of having liability for their own actions? Chinese or American, the terms are going to be the same, otherwise it would just be racism. The end :)

    4. Re:This won't go far with the Blizzard ToS by Mulkiatsch · · Score: 1
      In order to establish an Account, you must be a 'Natural Person,' who is the age of majority in the country where you are a citizen.
      The age of majority? I'm not a native speaker, so please correct me if I'm wrong, but shouldn't that be maturity? If Blizzard's lawyers are this bad, they're certainly going to lose the suit. Jeez...
    5. Re:This won't go far with the Blizzard ToS by Mulkiatsch · · Score: 1
      Okay, please ignore me. m-w.com says:
      2 a : the age at which full civil rights are accorded b : the status of one who has attained this age
      Next time I'll look it up before posting, I promise.
  140. The Optimist in me says.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...at least America isn't the only place where people don't understand the concept of being responsible for their own actions.

    I was beginning to think we had the market cornered on idiocy.

  141. What is "You sucked at being a parent" in Chinese? by Bushido+Hacks · · Score: 0

    Sigh. No matter how many times we go over this there is alway some moron who decides to blame the Internet, video game developers, television, movie directors, recording artists, consumer product manufacturers, book authors, people "who don't have enough Jebus in their lives" or some other parahia (sp) to futher their personal agenda.
    What's next for China? The Jack Thompson world tour?
    Are they going to blame video games and the Internet for school shootings and violent behavior but deny that it was their own fault because they sucked at being a parent?
    If the Chinese government is going to lay down the law, why not do the people of China a favor and punish this twit.
    In Communist China, you do not ban video games. Video games ban you!

    --
    The Rapture is NOT an exit strategy.
  142. Re:tobacco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    They got sued because they deliberately made their product more adictive.
    No, they got sued because they deliberately said their products were safe when they knew beyond any doubt that the products were harmful.
  143. One less Noob! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stinkin' 13-year-olds were ruining the game anyway!

  144. Wrong name by Oldsmobile · · Score: 1

    That would be "Mr. Zhang" as in China the family name comes first. You insensitive clod.

    --
    Some say he is made with ascii, others that he is eyeballed daily by millions. All we know is, he is known as the Sig
  145. Re:An interesting letter from a parent by nartz · · Score: 1

    Seriously, how many of us have seen people jumping out of airplanes? Jumping off cliffs, jumping off roofs.... I can thinkg of hundreds of movies that show the same thing. Is this any different?

  146. He was pushed,,,, by NeuroAcid · · Score: 1

    by his parents.

    --
    "I don't need drugs to enjoy this, just to enhance it" - Otto
  147. Nahh, IU think he means by da5idnetlimit.com · · Score: 1

    "training yourself"

    The WoW academy opens in each country, and to get a level up or more preficiency on a weapon, you have to go to the center and train In Real Life in battleaxe, longsword, bow, close combat etc...

    You get certified levels, and the levels are reported in the game along with your personal profile -then you can use your character, that have the same characteristic as you, and get it at the dummy that told you you were a wimp last week.

    I'm sure the local Wicca chapter will be happy to train you in basic spell casting and such 8)

    As an alternative, I propose a combinaison home bicycle with included eletro-simulators you must patch everywhere on your body.

    If you want your character to run, you bicycle harder, when your character trains to get an upgrade, the electro-simulator makes your muscle work harder...

    And in fighting, you get to feel the blows with a nice electrical shock of varying power depending on the adversary "dice-roll".

    People playing 8 hours or more a day will either get a perfect body or a massive physical collapse, BDSM players will go for losing as much as possible...

    Also, you get a new generation of highly trained martial art practitioners in the streets, proficient with everything from saber to long bow, making it safer for everybody (except for that level 23 necromancer, that is getting too good for everybody's tastes).

      The marines can directly know where to put you after seeing your stats in Couter Strike, the local mob can tell if you are more of a pimp or a drug smuggler, and use you accordingly...

    Yes, I can definetly see a market for this 8)

    (I know, there are some things like the Power Joystick and such, that forces you to train to get to play, and those shoes with a walkometer...I still like my idea best 8p )

    --
    It takes 40+ muscles to frown, but only four to extend your arm and bitchslap the motherfucker
  148. a precedent exists. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most building codes have restrictions on the size of holes/gaps in fencing material. The goal is to prevent a toddler from trapping their head in the hole.

  149. The thing that I don't get is... by RealmRPGer · · Score: 1

    How could the kid possibly think he'd come out alright? I mean, even in the game jumping from heights can kill you, and if it doesn't kill you it hurts you quite nicely. Therefore any kid attempting a re enactment must be trying to hurt himself, because that's the only thing that ever results from a jump in WoW. If you try to disregard this fact, then you must also disregard any connection it may have to WoW.

    I think that's actually a pretty strong case for Blizzard. The kid obviously had a mental problem if he could see the jumping but not the hurting.

  150. See GWB is right Democracy is on the march by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Before idiot 'murkian kids would have done this but now it proves freedom is on the march as it was a chinese kid.

  151. One boils water to make coffee... by msauve · · Score: 1, Troll

    so one can reasonably expect it to be served at any temperature up to boiling. Simple physics limits the maximum temperature. McDonald's is not, and cannot be, at fault for serving "too hot" coffee, regardless of the serving temperature others use. The OP burned themselves.

    --
    "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    1. Re:One boils water to make coffee... by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1, Insightful

      so one can reasonably expect it to be served at any temperature up to boiling. Simple physics limits the maximum temperature. McDonald's is not, and cannot be, at fault for serving "too hot" coffee, regardless of the serving temperature others use. The OP burned themselves.

      No, one can reasonably expect it to be at a temperature fit for consumption and at a temperature that is reasonably safe.

      You don't assume that the hot water coming out of a faucet is going to be 95C. Such a temperature is extremely dangerous for water that will likely come into contact with skin.

      Coffee spills happen, particularly when you serve coffee in styrofoam cups with lids that frequently pop off (causing the cup to deform and spill liquid). As such, it is up to McDonalds to ensure that their product is safe if spilled. They aren't selling concentrated hydrochloric acid, they are selling a beverage.

      95C is unreasonably hot for a beverage.

    2. Re:One boils water to make coffee... by Cederic · · Score: 2, Insightful


      Bullshit. Utter crap.

      My parents taught me to make tea and coffee when I was a kid. We used a kettle.

      The kettle boils water. When it boils, you pour water into the teapot/cup.

      Boiling water is 100C. It's safe to assume the coffee I was making was around 95C.

      If I can make coffee at that temperature at the age of 8, it's pretty sensible to assume that coffee being bought somewhere else might be that hot. Holding it between my thighs would thus be very stupid.

      95C is not unreasonably hot for a beverage. Anybody that pretends otherwise is out to make money from that fact.

    3. Re:One boils water to make coffee... by instarx · · Score: 2, Insightful

      so one can reasonably expect it to be served at any temperature up to boiling. Simple physics limits the maximum temperature. McDonald's is not, and cannot be, at fault for serving "too hot" coffee, regardless of the serving temperature others use. The OP burned themselves.

      This concept is oh so wrong. Coffee can indeed be too hot. All it has to be is signifcantly hotter than would normally be expected. Serving coffee at 200 degrees rather than the 160 degrees all other restaurants serve it is really a trap for the consumer.

      To illustrate, everyone expects brakes on cars to work about the same. similar pedal pressure stops the cars in a similar distance. Suppose one car maker decided to adjust the brakes on its cars so they take twice as long to stop and then they don't tell anyone. The cars will still stop just as fast if you press the brakes hard enough, but still people get injured. After a few hundred rear-enders they get sued, and rightly so. There are norms for many things, and when a company violates those norms and as a result injures people, they are liable. It makes no difference whether the brakes don;t stop you as fast as standard brakes or the coffee is hotter than standard coffee, the company is liable and NOT the consumer.

      During this time I saw the local McDonalds put improvised lids on their self-serve coffee pots to make it even hotter than the hotplate would make it. This made the coffee so hot it was dangerous. You had to be careful not to let the steam burn your fingers as you took the plastic lid off the pot to pour it. I knew the coffee was really hot because I poured mine, but the people in the dive-thru getting coffee handed to them had no idea how absurdly hot it was.

    4. Re:One boils water to make coffee... by leland242 · · Score: 1

      That you are modded "Troll" is obscene.

      Water / coffee can only be so hot. It's irrelevant if Burger King sells it at temp A and McD's sells it at temp A+40. OP is right - it can't be hotter than boiling water!!!

      One should assume that coffee is hot enough to harm you if you spill it all over yourself.

    5. Re:One boils water to make coffee... by ElleyKitten · · Score: 1

      The customers are in cars. They are served coffee in styrofoam cups with unstable lids. The combination makes spills rather likely. Maybe she shouldn't have put it between her legs, however. if she had been holding it in her hand and spilled it, she could have gotten similar amounts of burns. Would you have supported her lawsuit then?
       

      --
      "What is Internet Explorer 7? Are you saying we can't access the normal internet?" - I love tech support. Really.
    6. Re:One boils water to make coffee... by danila · · Score: 1

      Coffee can be hotter than boiling water. All it requires is for McDonalds to start selling it in sealed containers under pressure. Just imagine it - you make a order in a drive-through, get it, open the coffee container and experience the wonderfully tasty pressurized 500-degrees Celsium coffee.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
  152. Parents fault by THRiLL_KiLL2666 · · Score: 1

    if the game is so addicting, then why do they let thier children play it? Its not like the children have a job, where they can pay the monthly fee and the inital cost of purchasing the game. so why should the game manucatures (sp) be responsable for the lack of parenting?

  153. geronimo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have never felt that jumping was such a big deal in World of Warcraft..
    However Morrowind, (and the fact that jumping soon became one of the quickest ways to get around certain areas) did actually leave me feeling (at some level) a compulsion to leap between levels of the local mall.
    The 'reflex' feeling seemed to be coming from the same part of my brain that occasionally has me reaching for a 'space-bar' (jump) when a pot-hole gets in my way while driving.

    Still, i can't imagine how distracted/drugged i would have had to have been to actually -jump-!

  154. Come on man, be more responsible! by Jerk+City+Troll · · Score: 4, Funny

    Obviously, in the context of this story, a half-dozen Slashbots are going to grab their cat and prepare an entree with it the manner which you described. Come on, what were you thinking!? They'll no doubt end up suing Slashdot and depriving us all of one of our favorite drugs.

    1. Re:Come on man, be more responsible! by Surt · · Score: 1

      I assume you mean kitten huffing?

      http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/Kitten_Huffing

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
  155. How did they know.. by screwdriver · · Score: 1

    ...that he was reenacting a scene from WoW? Did they ask him post mortum?

  156. Un'goro jump? by patonw · · Score: 1

    I hope it wasn't the jump from Tanaris to Un'goro because that'll kill most players except priests and skilled mages.

    O RLY?
    it's fine, learn2litigate

  157. Folks, it's called 'Natural Selection'. by Stupor+Man · · Score: 0

    Warning labels, etc. need to be REMOVED. Let nature take it's course and it will eliminate these kind of morons from the gene pool - perferably before they can breed. Last time I checked, Blizzard wasn't nature.

  158. They were actually looking at that by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    WoW has a concept called rest, when you are logged off inside an inn, you character gains "rest". The net effect is that you gain experience twice as fast until your rest bonus is expended. In beta, they'd played with that going even further, that you'd start to go in to a fatigued state where you'd get less and less experience unless you went and rested. It was ultimately scrapped, but was considered.

    Star Wars Galaxies had somethin that was actually like this. As you fought, your character had a fatigue stat (I don't remember if that's what it was called, but that's what it was) that would build up. At first it did nothing but as it got higher it started to really interfere with performance. Eventually you had no choice but to stop. The only way to cure it was to head to a city and hang out in a cantina. If there were entertainers there (players could be entertainers) watching them would make it go away faster.

    Eve had another function that put limits on your grinding and that was that skills increased based on realtime spent, in game or out. You specificed a skill that was to be worked on and your character would start working, and continue to do so regarless of your presence. However there wasn't any way to accelerate it, it simply took a certian amount of actual time.

    Personally I like the concept to diminishing returns in games, though probably because I'm a casual gamer. I think it's a nice idea to set it up so that you CAN grind all the time, but you don't get a whole lot for it over simply playing a bit every day or so.

    However that's more a balance issue than a compulsive behaviour prevention one. Some people will get addicted to games, just like some peopel get addicted to gambling. If you change the game dynamic that won't change anything. They'll just be the ones grinding all the time, even if it gives them only a 1% gain over playing casually because it's not about that.

  159. Gee ... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

    it's too bad they won the BnetD lawsuit ... otherwise the headline might have read "Gamers sued for Death of Blizzard".

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  160. Re:tobacco by martinX · · Score: 1
    --
    When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
  161. That's a load of crap and you should know it by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    There is an extreme difference between psychologically and physcially addicative problems. Some people are such that they find things like games or gambling, or even collecting card addictive whereas most people don't. That's tragic, but doesn't mean we should try and ban things. You do not have progress as a society by banning anything that's a problem for any one person because you end up banning everything.

    That's very different from nicotene. That's addictive to basically everyone who tries it. There are rare people who cannot get addicted, byt they are 1:10,000 or less. Everyone else, if you try nicotene for any amount of time, you WILL get addicted, no questions asked. Worse, it's a physical respone. Your body actually has a need for the drug, and exhibits symptoms of withdrawl, same as if you withhold anything critical to survival like food or water.

    Some peopel will just take any kind of escapism to an excess. That's something that needs to be treated, not the entertainment itself.

    So here's something to try: Find the number of people addicted to nicotene in the US. Now find the number of people addicted to games. Then, find the number of deaths caused by each per year. When the nubers are anything even near each other, then let's talk. Until then, please stop with the fearmongering.

  162. In Other News... by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

    The Beloved Party handed down execution orders for the parents, on the grounds that they wasted precious state resources raising their One Child to be so completely braindead. The deceased child will be eulogized and immoralized as a state hero for sparing the national gene pool from further corruption.

    (If you're gonna have a police state, have fun with it!)

  163. Suicide Solution by SlashSquatch · · Score: 1

    Whoops I misread the headline as Blizzard of Oz sued...

    --
    Autonomous Retard -- Is your camp safe? UnsafeCamp.com
  164. Child dies after parent's viper escape tank by CriminalNerd · · Score: 1

    Parent sues pet store owner.

  165. I'd rather call this ... by hubertf · · Score: 1

    ... natural selection.

  166. WTS by MutantEnemy · · Score: 1

    Parachute Cloak
    Binds when equipped
    Back
    30 Armor
    +8 Agility
    Requires Engineering (225)
    Use: Reduces your fall speed for 10 sec.

    --
    Grr! Arg!
  167. The big question by cicatrix1 · · Score: 1

    Is there any documented evidence, i.e. pictures or video, that shows Mr Jack Thompson and Mr. Chunliang in the same place at the same time? Hmmmm....

    --

    I know more than you drink.
  168. is this serious ? by raides · · Score: 1

    the kid obviously never took a physics class, this is so ridiculous, one would almost believe the Chinese Govt set this up in order to push the ban of MMORPGs in their country, or at least a limit to their gameplay. for most MMORPG people who say that WoW is filled with fast-food type gamers, i guess this and the multiple deaths in china show that to the chinese, WoW is truly their escape from reality. in no way is this blizzard's fault, it is just sad. seriously. if the parents were smart they would have at least wondered why the kid never went outside. this type of escape from reality doesnt happen in less than a year, in most cases. this is probably something that the parents should have noticed in their child who was playing more video games and eating rather than going outside and participating in activities. the parents should have forced his ass into a recreational activity that is school sponsored, like everyone else's parents have done since the industrial revolution.

  169. Wonder what he screamed out when he jumped... by otis+wildflower · · Score: 2, Funny

    L
    E
    E
    E
    E
    E
    E
    E
    R
    O
    Y
    Y

    J
    E
    N
    K
    I
    N
    S
    !

  170. Parental Responsibilities...oh, wait, nm. by eonlabs · · Score: 1

    I love it how no one could even think of turning off the computer on their kids nowadays. Did anyone else besides me have parents who said, "You've watched more than enough TV. Turn it off" ?

    These parents who think a game will affect their kids development more than they can aren't fit for parenting.

    and I love seeing how far the McDonalds Coffee is Hot lawsuits are going to go.

    Boxes of toothpicks have instructions now. Need I say anymore?

    --
    I wouldn't consider the mad hatter mad. Just reality impaired. He sure can make a mean cup of tea.
  171. My 11 year old by phrostie · · Score: 1

    i asked mine if he would do that and he thought i'd lost my mind for even asking.

  172. slight bit of a rant. by Moritishi · · Score: 2, Interesting
    first off, I want to say sorry for ranting, but this topic really really bugs me.

    [rant] I've played many games, and have gotten addicted to quite a few of them, my roommate and I spent an entire year playing games online together, we also hosted dnd games, and L5R games (another style of dnd game http://www.l5r.com/) and in the past 7+ years, none of my 20+ friends who have played dnd/l5r or anything with us have; committed suicide, tryed to re-enact, re-create anything that we've played out in our games. Now, that being said, I'm sure there were quite a few of us who have thought 'wouldn't it be cool to be able to blink, and turn invisible.' or something along those lines. But than again, who hasn't thought that. AND! to that end, why is it a games fault, look at tv, look at movies. I find it incredibly funny, and insulting as a gamer, that the most graphic/gory/destructive tv show is on every day, at least 3 times a day, on almost every single channel, News. My perspective on games, and their effects on people, is a rather simple one. It goes a little something like this.

    A famous mom once said "I don't care what 'Jimmy' said, if little 'jimmy' jumped off a bridge, would you follow him, and jump as well."

    sorry if anyone's name here happens to be jimmy. or jim, or anything like that, no reference meant

    Now I'm sure almost everyone on these boards has heard this saying at least once, and can appreciate it's meaning. = just because so and so did that, what makes you think you can to.

    I'm really quite sick of horrible parents trying to find an easy scapegoat for their own incapabilities.

    Lets break something down here

    car accidents attribute to the most deaths (aside from accidents, natural, and wartime) in the US (according to disastercentre http://www.disastercenter.com/cdc/ and yet parents/family members/relatives never seem to sue car manufatcurers (aside from when the car actually has a defect). MADD is trying to get stiffer penalties to alcohol makers when their product is found to be the cause of car accidents causing death, but that has so far failed, for a reason, it's not the manufacturers fault, it's the fault of the user.

    However, when it comes to kids doing incredibly stupid things, if it can be even remotely related to a game they played, BAM instant lawsuit.

    It seems that recently, lawsuits are fast becoming the replacement for good parenting. If a parent has a problem with their child, they immediately blame it on the most recent game that their child played.

    I'm shocked that parents of dead soldiers aren't suing makers of games like America's Army, or Battlefield, or Counterstrike? I'm sure that's in the works somewhere.

    Anyways.

    I really don't see how a Game can force a child/teen/adult, person, to go out and do something incredibly stupid. It really makes you wonder, what happened to good ol common sense.

    In the case of WOW vs. flying chinese child, I wonder. Where were the parents, where was the parenting that says, jumping off the balcony is not smart. Where were the parents saying "are you done your homework?" For that matter, where were the parents when this kid bought the game, ignoring the fact that the game is intended for teens (yeah I know T=13 plus) but still, I wonder if the parents know anything about the game, aside from the fact that it's made by that american company that they're suing...???

    I'm really quite appalled that soo many parents are turning to the courts to help back them in their failures to parent properly. [/rant]

    Where are the good ol days when babysitters were real, cute girls, that every kid loved having over, just for a chance to "cop a feel" not games, or TV that "implants bad thoughts in childrens heads"

    I really must ask the question. If games are soo bad, why do so many parents turn a blind eye when their kids go out and get them??? OOPS I forg

  173. He should've been a druid. by kyhwana · · Score: 1

    "The parents filed a suit against Blizzard Entertainment on Wednesday, saying their son jumped to his death while reenacting a scene from the game, the report said."

    He should've been a druid! Half damage in cat form with the right talent! ;)

    --
    My email addy? should be easy enough.
  174. Re:Relevant link by Skevin · · Score: 4, Funny

    > Sue yourself, idiot.

    I tried to sue myself, but then I counter-sued for undue distress and emotional damage. I then added another lawsuit because I defamed my character, but unfortunately, I had a much better lawyer than I did, and I could not recoup damages once I won. I'm upset that the court awarded me judgement, but I'm afraid that I'll find other frivolous charges to sue myself with. My other suit is still pending, but my lawyer says I have a pretty good chance that I'll drop my charges if I'm willing to settle out of court. I'm currently demanding $500,000 but I'm negotiating to see if I'm willing to come down in my demands. So far, I'm not willing to budge, and I insist that I just don't have that kind of money readily available, but the worst case scenario is that I might garnish my wages for the next 20 years if I win the case. My best hope is to try to discredit me in front of the judge and make my lawsuit seem really stupid, or better yet, make me appear to be of unsound mind.

    Solomon Chang

    --
    "Twice half-assed makes an ass whole." --Solomon K. Chang
  175. Terrorist attack! by Chayak · · Score: 1

    Well I've always thought terrorists were stupid for going after heavily defended targets. All they have to do is hit the WoW datacenter, EQ and other online games and the implications would rock the world with mass suicides and social breakdown! lol sadly, this is true because the actual effect of that would strike fear in a lot of people.. .loose my 60 mage! OMG! lol

  176. well 2 things by StormKrow · · Score: 1

    1. He should be nominated for a Darwin Award.

    2. That's one less chinese farmer to worry about selling Krol Blades.

    --
    Who cares about the ozone layer?...thanks to CFC's I can write my name......IN CHEESE!!!
  177. Blizzard can say; by megadert · · Score: 1

    Blizzard can win the court by saying; Your son forgot to turn on his "slow fall".

  178. Levelling is standard in many activities by phorm · · Score: 1

    When you lift weights, you gradually increase the weight. When you do many activities, you increase the difficulty as you increase your ability.

    You could create a conspirary theory detailing 'levelling' as a behavior intended to addict, however it's been around since NES games and earlier... long before MMORPGS. Sometimes there's a line between "make interesting" and "make addicting." Sometimes whether something does one or the other depends mainly on the person involved in the activity as well.

  179. OMG ITS A FREAKIN GAME!!!! by rholtzjr · · Score: 1

    For those parents who have not taught their chilren to recognize a fantasy role playing game from reality should be arrested for child negligence.

  180. Natural Selection by twistedcain · · Score: 1

    My 5 year old knows that jumping from a high surface will hurt when you land. Some kids are stupid, some people can't understand that. I meet stupid adults all the time, weren't these stupid adults once stupid children?

    Look at it this way, psychic hotlines exist even though the first question any caller should ask the phychic to answer is what color shirt and socks you are wearing, but they do exist and so do stupid people. This kid was a stupid person. We should be grateful for two things, 1) he died before producing any offspring and 2) he didn't hurt anybody else while killing himself.

  181. Stupid kids... by T_ConX · · Score: 0

    Some would call this event a tragedy. Others would call this evolution...

  182. it's all good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's nature's way of getting rid of the gene pool of extremely stupid children.

  183. educational and mental health issues by Sylven_1969 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Any kid, boy or girl, who hasn't figured out they can't fly by the age of 13 has either had a very, very poor education or has some major mental handicaps. In either case they shouldn't have been allowed to play a Rated "T" game as it should have been obvious to the parents that even though they might be aged 13, they obviously didn't have the full mental capacity of a 13 year old (or a 3 year old for that matter). I feel bad for the parents in this case, but blaming the gaming company for your bad parenting is an obvious case of passing the buck. I truly feel for any parent that loses a child so, I have 2 of the little buggers myself, so don't think that I don't feel sympathy for what they are going through. I'm simply trying to state the fact that kids don't gun down their school mates, commit suicide and/or acts of murder or try to fly unless there are some major underlying problems other than the game, music, movie, book or whatever other form of media the parents, lawyers and politicians try to blame it on. Just one Hoosierbillys opinion as usual ;), Jason

    --
    Jay Dale "If you're not living on the edge then you're taking up too much space!"
  184. You're new here, aren't you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    ou're supposed to punch while you jump. Not even Mario broke bricks with his *head*. (Score: 5, Informative)

    MODS ON CRACK! Are you out of your minds???

    However you look at it, that IS informative as much as this IS "news for nerds, stuff that matters".

  185. Intelligent Falling by macdaddy · · Score: 1
  186. FF7? by b4k3d+b34nz · · Score: 1

    In other news, an 11-year old boy from Michigan killed a classmate when he became enraged and performed his level 4 limit break, Omnislash.

    --
    Grammar Lesson: you're is a contraction of "you are"; your means you possess something; yore means days gone by.
  187. Re:An interesting letter from a parent by Long-EZ · · Score: 1
    It's your job to make sure that your kid wears a helmet... It's your job to make sure your kid doesn't stick a fork in the electrical outlet...

    I was a kid before kids wore bike helmets. When I was 13, I'd be gone for five hours, biking in three states, talking to winos under the bridge, and flying down steep hills at 35 MPH with no thought of my fragile unprotected skull. When I returned home:

    Mom: "What have you been doing all day?"
    Me: "Riding my bike."
    Mom: "Dinner's almost ready."

    I think she believed I was biking around the block in our middle class suburban neighborhood for five hours.

    A couple of years later, I bent the tines on two forks and pushed them (individually!) into a 120 VAC electrical outlet. Then, I tossed a pad of steel wool onto the fork handles from across the room. It was a great shot - truly a zen moment. There was a bright flash of light and a sharp electrical crack. The lights went out and the air was filled with the pungent aroma of iron oxide and Brillo detergent.

    It's all good fun. Life is risk. What's the point if it isn't fun?

    The problem with warning labels is they're all so uniformative. I want to see a warning label on a bottle of ammonia that describes in detail what chemicals should not be mixed with ammonia, what proportions they should not be mixed, and what processes should not be used to avoid producing explosives such as ammonium tri-iodine. "Warning - Coffee is hot" How much fun can you have with that?

    --
    >> My ultraviolent Linux switch video.
  188. My Son by geomon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My son plays video games - plenty of them too. He plays WoW, GTA, and about a half dozen games that involve various levels of mayhem. He laughs hysterically at the images of bodies dropping, sans heads, with the appropriate level of blood splatter to boot.

    But he is a major-class wimp when it comes to seeing the real thing. My wife, my daughters and I can sit in the living room watching a Discovery television program on surgery techniques, where flesh and bone are exposed and articulated for the camera. No problems for us. My son, however, gets noticeably queasy and has to leave the room to avoid getting sick.

    I took him in to the podiatrist to have him examined for surgery on his feet. The doctor described in detail the procedure they will be following to correct his bunions. That process involves cutting wedges out of his phalanges and shaving the metatarsals. I watched my son as the doctor went through his description and noted the loss of color in his face, his agitated state, and his breathing. I thought he was going to vomit in the examination room. And all the doctor was doing was talking.

    When we got in the car to head back home I asked my son why he was unable to deal with the descriptions of cutting and shaving bone when he could watch people blown to bits playing video games.

    His reply was: "I know the difference between fantasy and reality".

    --
    "Rocky Rococo, at your cervix!"
  189. Re:An interesting letter from a parent by Krater76 · · Score: 1

    Oh please. There are no interesting arguments in that letter at all. To say that there are is just being small-minded and not taking the facts into a consideration.

    First of all, comparing a police shooting to a school shotting is a waste of time. Especially when there is no context. How close were the police? How close was the school shooter? There is no proof that violent video games make you a better gunman. If that were true wouldn't baseball games make you a better batter or fielder?

    Hand-eye coordination is one thing but to think that one specific type of it gains grounds in a different specific type is rediculous. I.E., just because I can fly a chopper in Battlefield 2 doesn't mean I can fly one in real life. And just because a mother, father, or community has mental anguish over a tragic incident there is no reason to start laying blame on things that have no logical link.

    Trying to keep violent videogames away from people they aren't the target audience for by restricting sales won't work. If the parents didn't know what games their kids are buying they won't know what games they will have to buy for them. It might keep a few kids from getting an M-rated game but it's not going to keep someone from getting shot or making poor decisions that lead to them getting hurt. The plain fact is that parents think video games are Pong, Frogger, Joust, Mario, and Zelda. They still think that games are simple kids toys when in reality are cross-generational entertainment - just like movies, television, and books.

    Parents usually pay attention to what their kids watch on TV and what movies they go to so why not video games? This is still up to the parents.

    --
    "Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?" - Patrick Henry
  190. Meanwhile, everywhere by Sippan · · Score: 1

    Cigarrette smoking is still legal.

    --
    Frog blast the vent core.
  191. Sue Coach! by njwashor · · Score: 1

    Poor kid cast his spell succesfully, enchanting the item with great magical properties. Too bad the leather was inferior and did not hold the enchantment long enough for him to descend from the tops of Teldrassil safely. :(

  192. TG Daily's article by not5150 · · Score: 1

    http://www.tgdaily.com/2005/11/22/suicideclaim-wor ldofwarcraft/

    We dug a little deeper into the story and also translated the original Chinese language newspaper article. Turns out he thought he could meet his night elf hero if he committed suicide.

    He wrote four letters and one hand-written note to his parents saying goodbye. He also logged onto WoW and told his guild buddies goodbye.

    There is no part of the game that makes you commit suicide, but there are two quests where you can jump off a mountain or building. The Alliance one is in Feralas and the Horde one is in Thousand Needles.

  193. Ouch!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe I should sue the creator of Pulp Fiction for putting it in someone's head to rape me in the arse!

  194. It is MOST DEFINITELY Blizzards fault... by spazmolytic666 · · Score: 0

    that i get matched with noob teammates all the time in Frozen Throne. This post 1.14 AMM sucks a big one.

    --
    Help! I've fallen in a karma hole and I can't get up!
  195. Fastest lawsuit ever by BluedemonX · · Score: 1

    Mr. YongLingLiang, you never actually PAID for Warcraft. You bought it on a CD with fifty thousand other pirated games for a few yuan.

    *blink* *blink*

    --

    --- Jump!! Fire!! Bullet time!! - Lego version of the Matrix
  196. Why he really jumped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok this may offend you but its the truth:

    The REAL reason he jumped is not because of WoW... no, its because of his NINJA ANCESTRY! Since he is Chinese he related to his ancestors and took the tok' i tawinawa rights of trial test. By jumping he wanted to see if he was a ninja at heart. Evidently he was not. Infact he was a total moron, he never even recieved a black belt and he attempted the rights of passage!

    Im sorry if I offended you chinese people (my dead cousin is chinese so its all good) but really its the goddamn truth.

    F*cking ninjas....

    1. Re:Why he really jumped by physman_wiu · · Score: 1

      It's not because he was a Nija. It's because the goddamn parents don't know how to control their children's gaming habits. I mean what kind of stupid mother says, "OK. Sure baby, you don't need to study, play games for 14 hours a day. As long as your happy." American parents are going the same route. No one hits their kids anymore from fear or being sued by their own kids! Either that or have the DCFS up their but. Now China doesn't have this problem with the goverment forcing child rights upon them. They let the parents take care of the kids as they see fit. The problem is the parents don't want to take care of their kids. Lazy ass Chinese people! I've seen this first hand as I teach them English, the parents are either one extreme or the next, they don't know what compromise is!

      --
      Physics is imagination in a straight jacket. ~John Moffat
  197. Just once... by permawired · · Score: 0

    ..I'd like to see the good that has come from video games and other such things. People get insperation from media, games, and people surroundign them. Hell if it wasn't for Doom, I wouldn't have learned near as much as I did about networking while I was in high school. I've played countless hours of violent games, and haven't killed or harmed anyone. As a matter of fact when I had a bad (as a kid) I could go home and play some of those games to rid myself of the aggression. I wish studies wern't so lopsided. I'm sure that people in all kinds of sports and other professiona have enjoyed the benefit of better hand eye coordination, and reaction time due to playing video games when they were young. IMHO because of the percentage here (ie 4.5 million users, 1 has died) this kid would still have done himself in, albet for a different reason. Who know maybe I'm wrong and we all need to live in a Brady Bunch world....

  198. Take Responsibility parents by Spherelin · · Score: 1

    I think the parents need to wake up and realize that they are responsible. They should have limited the amount of time that their child was playing WOW. Where were they when their kid was being sucked in by the game? I personally know people that have lost their jobs because of this game, because they were addicted to it. Call Blizzard and file a suit right? No. It is these individuals' faults. They were late to work, one person was late 14 times in a month. Aye aye aye....

    --
    Geoff
    geoff@nearsphere.com