I'm sorry, this is a pathologically dense comment.
The broadcasters have a fixed broadcast cost regardless of how many people are receiving it. A logical person (or entity) would want to amortize that cost over as many households as possible. They are 'compensated' by showing their advertisers how big their audience is. That's how BROADcast works.
By your logic, antenna manufacturers and installers have no right to profit from broadcast signals either.
Slashdot Mirror
of course they can. it says so right here on the label.
by your argument pi = 4.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D2xYjiL8yyE
or use nanometers
rebroadcast. You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
If you're the broadcasters' lawyer, they're going to lose.
I'm sorry, this is a pathologically dense comment.
The broadcasters have a fixed broadcast cost regardless of how many people are receiving it. A logical person (or entity) would want to amortize that cost over as many households as possible. They are 'compensated' by showing their advertisers how big their audience is. That's how BROADcast works.
By your logic, antenna manufacturers and installers have no right to profit from broadcast signals either.
except of course it's like this
hours 0-40, you're an hourly employee
hours 40+, you're a salaried imployee
it's like the Uncanny Valley. you need to be either right here or very far away.
ok, Bill and Dave, you heard her, get out of the garage and back into your cube!
don't forget the anti-piracy core curriculum...
you'd think the kids with vision problems would automatically get coupons for LensCrafters...
not necessarily. driving gives one plenty of time to think while still putting food on the table.
is your sig intended as a necessary reminder to yourself?
in my day he would have been a Double Minus!
to translate
when they suck, they suck
when you suck, they suck
now that would be a fantastic documentary.
Look in the mirror and witness the spread of neoconservative ideology. Thought idiology might be more apt.
but they are consistently better at it...
> The FISA court can always say "no" to a warrant request, or modify the request - which it regularly does.
0.03 percent of the time. Must be a definition of 'regularly' I am not acquainted with.
Oh, and you forgot to mention the velvet rope. Velvet Rope
quality is free. they read that in a book somewhere...
make sure you get the 3rd edition, just released a month or so ago
you've got a better chance of them (actually) reading Peopleware
I guess someone told you that the schedule is always right.
I wonder what he'd think about removing the door altogether and cutting the walls in half. That must mean extra successful.
you need people-cancelling headphones