Slashdot Mirror


User: trold

trold's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
23
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 23

  1. Re:Give a man to fish... on How the Critics of the Apollo Program Were Proven Wrong · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... Teach a man to fish, and you've turned him into a habitual liar.

  2. Alphabet? on Is It Time To End Our Love Affair With the QWERTY Keyboard? · · Score: 1

    "We have put the keys in alphabetical order"

    Yes, we all remember the good old alphabet: "...ghZij..." WTF?

  3. Dorky on Google Glasses Announced · · Score: 1

    It is still considered extremely dorky to wear a phone headset outside of a car. We would have to come up with a whole new range of adjectives to describe the level of dorkiness associated with wearing one of these. I doubt it will catch on before it becomes less visible than an earpiece...

  4. Prior art on Reinventing the Clapper With a Knock-Based Home Automation Controller · · Score: 4, Funny

    The product is clearly a knockoff

  5. Re:End of the reboot? on HP To Introduce Flash Memory Replacement In 2013 · · Score: 1

    True, but flushing CPU cache is many orders of magnitude faster than writing to disk. Except they probably want to use this technology to merge disk and RAM.

  6. Re:End of the reboot? on HP To Introduce Flash Memory Replacement In 2013 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You've missed an important point here. Non-volatile RAM means than powering off does not imply a reboot. When power returns the next morning, or after the weekend, the computer is still in the same state as when you pulled the plug Friday evening. /trold

  7. Re:Right Now It's a 7 on Japan Raises Nuclear Plant Crisis Severity To 7 · · Score: 0

    No. If it gets 100 times worse, it's still not as bad as Chernobyl.

  8. Wrong summary on Tracking Browsers Without Cookies Or IP Addresses? · · Score: 1

    Revealing 10.5 bits of information about yourself will place you in one of roughly 1500 groups, not in a group of size 1500. With more than 1.5 billion internet users, you are "identified" as being in a group of 1 million.

  9. Re:But why? on Future Ubisoft Games To Require Constant Internet Access · · Score: 1

    I guess someone thought it would be an effective way to prevent piracy

    Once you've started a legitimate copy of a game, what process do they figure will turn the copy into an illegitimate one during gameplay?

    I am guessing someone starting the game with the same credentials. Steam allows you to install your games on several computers, but only play on one at a time. This is done by only allowing one Steam client to connect with a given username. This can be circumvented by starting a game, and then disconnecting from the internet. The Ubisoft fix is to require continuous connectivity, which then ruins the game for those of us with an unstable internet conne...

  10. Re:Well, that seems cut & dried... on MIT Project "Gaydar" Shakes Privacy Assumptions · · Score: 1

    It is pretty easy to get within the error margins these guys are working with. Assuming you are testing on a uniform sample of the population, you would be right more than 90% of the time by saying "not gay".

  11. Re:no way of knowing for sure on The Problem With Estimating Linux Desktop Market Share · · Score: 1

    since most all Linux distros can be downloaded anonymously for free from many servers/mirrors around the world there is no way of knowing for sure...

    Penguinpeople always read from a single file to hide there numbers.

  12. Re:Shoot the messenger! on Breach Exposes 19,000 Active US, UK Credit Cards · · Score: 1

    robots.txt is not for security. Using it as such is the same as protecting your sensitive data by writing "DONT READ" in the top. Even worse, if you do rely on it, you provide a public list of what might be interesting on your site.

  13. Re:Were nerds here... use the f'ing metric system on The 100 Degree Data Center · · Score: 5, Funny

    What kind of backup do you need?
      0 K = DAMN COLD!
    10 K = DAMN COLD!
    20 K = DAMN COLD!
    30 K = DAMN COLD!
    40 K = DAMN COLD!
    50 K = DAMN COLD! ...
    200K = Pee freezes before hitting the ground
    400K = Pee evaporates before hitting the ground

    "Twice as hot" only makes sense in a scientific context. It is akin to saying that one computer is twice as blue as another.

  14. Re:Adblock on What Filters Are Right For Kids? · · Score: 4, Funny

    If she prefers IE for some weird reason then just put an ad-filtering web-proxy on your network like Junkbuster.

    If she is clever enough to get IE to run properly on the aforementioned linux systems, she is clever enough to configure her own porn-blocker...

  15. Re:Any idea what it is? on Norton Users Worried By PIFTS.exe, Stonewalling By Symantec · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The second that Linux gets above a 50% market, it will also be targeted by viruses, and anti-virus will then be a must for Linux.

    So, unless we want that to happen: Keep quiet and enjoy your virus-free Linux.

  16. A mosquito is just like windows... on Bill Gates Unleashes Swarm of Mosquitoes · · Score: 1

    ... it bites!

    And it is pretty much just one big bug.

  17. Re:*NOT* interested on Comcast Apologizes For Super Bowl Porn Glitch · · Score: 1

    The combination is so common that Merriam-Webster included Cathloholic is a proper word.

  18. Re:Only a few questions on Smart Robot Capable of Hunting For Its Own "Food" · · Score: 1

    I think the big limitation against a robot "eating" living things at this point is that the energy required in harvesting anything that moves is far in excess of the energy that the robot will be able to extract from it. Bound to be an inefficient process.

    Yeah, I can't imagine anything surviving on what it would have to hunt itself... Oh, wait, predatory carnivores do this all the time. It might be too pessimistic to assume that the efficiency in nature cannot be approximated.

  19. Wrong objective on Hardware Is Cheap, Programmers Are Expensive · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Good hardware running code written by bad programmers just means the code will fail faster. The primary goal of a programmer is to make the code work, and that does not change no matter how fast your hardware is.

  20. Shiny! on Hardware Is Cheap, Programmers Are Expensive · · Score: 1

    If you buy the newest hardware gizmo on the market, the geeks will be begging you to let them code for it.

  21. Jasper on Inventor Builds Robot Wife · · Score: 1

    I have frozen myself so I may live to see the wonders of the future. Thaw me out when robot wives are cheap and effective. P.S. Please alter my pants as fashion dictates.

  22. Re:Huge crytography implications! on Does P = NP? · · Score: 1

    The calculations:

    NP: (2^160)/(2^155) = 2^(160-155) = 2^5 = 32 times as hard.

    P: (160^16)/(155^16) = (160/155)^16 = 1.66192932761 times as hard

    /trold

  23. Re:Huge crytography implications! on Does P = NP? · · Score: 1

    >Rubbish! RSA only depends on that it is *hard* to factorize integers. If the polynomial is aggressive enough RSA may still be effective.
    >
    > Have you ever worked with O(n^16) algorithms? They are P allright but . . .

    RSA is heavily dependant on that factoring an integer can't be done (at this moment) in polynomial time. e.g. The RSA-155 challenge, where a 155 digit integer was to be factored into two prime numbers, was solved in roughly 8000 MIPS-years of CPU-effort. The next RSA challenge, RSA-160 (still not solved!), where only 5 more decimal digits are added, will require about 32 times (2^5 times) the CPU usage! This way it won't matter how fast a given computer-network can compute, you just add a few more digits to the key, and they'll have tons of work.

    If you could factorize an integer in polynomial time, you would have to use enormous keys. e.g. If it could be done in polynomial time (say O(n^16)) RSA-160 would only require 1.66 times the effort of RSA-155. The complexity-class means everything...

    /trold