Slashdot Mirror


Smart Robot Capable of Hunting For Its Own "Food"

coondoggie writes "Ok, maybe this is getting a little too close to bringing Terminator-like robots to life. For starters, eco-friendly engine builder Cyclone Power this week inked a contract from Robotic Technologies, Inc. (RTI) to develop what it calls a beta biomass engine system that will be the heart of RTI's Energetically Autonomous Tactical Robot (EATR). The purpose of EATR is to develop and demonstrate an autonomous robotic platform able to perform long-range, long-endurance missions without the need for manual or conventional re-fueling — in other words it needs to 'eat.' According to researchers, the EATR system gets its energy by foraging, or what the firms describe as 'engaging in biologically-inspired, organism-like, energy-harvesting behavior which is the equivalent of eating. It can find, ingest, and extract energy from biomass in the environment as well as use conventional and alternative fuels (such as gasoline, heavy fuel, kerosene, diesel, propane, coal, cooking oil, and solar) when suitable.'" We can only hope they don't team up with the Multi-Robot Pursuit System project to "search for and detect a non-cooperative human."

191 comments

  1. Not like Terminator by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 4, Funny

    Ok, maybe this is getting a little too close to bringing Terminator-like robots to life.

    No, too-Terminator-like would be if it said, "You are not Sarah Connor. But I am a bit peckish...."

    1. Re:Not like Terminator by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 5, Funny

      Come on... look on the bright side. Instead of your child getting blown apart by a land mine left over from the last invasion, they can get blown apart by a hunter-killer drone. That's WAY cooler.

      Reminds me of Stephen King's The Dark Tower... maybe they could dress it up like a bear...

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    2. Re:Not like Terminator by kitgerrits · · Score: 1

      I am weary, and their deaths will bring me little joy.

      Of course, sometimes, a little is enough.

      Then again, that was a vampire...

      --
      "I was in love with a beautiful blonde once, dear. She drove me to drink. It's the one thing I am indebted to her for."
    3. Re:Not like Terminator by memnock · · Score: 2, Funny

      ... more like The Matrix.

    4. Re:Not like Terminator by nizo · · Score: 1

      Except since it has a chainsaw, we would be more like cordwood than batteries to this thing.

    5. Re:Not like Terminator by Gunnut1124 · · Score: 0

      If only they were made by North Central Positronics.

      --
      America is all about speed. Hot, nasty, badass speed. -Eleanor Roosevelt, 1936
    6. Re:Not like Terminator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yep...first I thought of was Matrix...

    7. Re:Not like Terminator by Trent+Hawkins · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of Stephen King's The Dark Tower... maybe they could dress it up like a bear...

      Too late for that: DWA!

    8. Re:Not like Terminator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can see this leading to the introduction of "screamers" to the battlefields...

    9. Re:Not like Terminator by indytx · · Score: 1

      This doesn't have to be anything like Terminator. It could be much, MUCH better. Think mechanical zombies. That way, no one has to think about putting a bullet in a loved one. Now, if only they could self-replicate, my years of survival horror video games could be put to good use.

      --
      Make love, not reality television.
  2. I'm starting to think that the Amish by wiredog · · Score: 5, Insightful

    may just have a point.

    1. Re:I'm starting to think that the Amish by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm sure the robots will find them delicious as well.

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    2. Re:I'm starting to think that the Amish by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 5, Funny

      I bet the Amish could apply for the "organic" label.

      If a machine only eats "organic" people, do you think they'd be eligible for tax breaks as a "green" consumer?

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    3. Re:I'm starting to think that the Amish by Smidge207 · · Score: 1, Funny

      I bet the Amish could apply for the "organic" label.

      As in Amish potato salad?

      =Smidge=

      --
      Is it just my observation, or is eldavojohn an idiot?
    4. Re:I'm starting to think that the Amish by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, more like "Genuine Corn Fed Humans, no extra processing, no artificial hormones or sweeteners! Raised on the farm without cages!"

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    5. Re:I'm starting to think that the Amish by lemur666 · · Score: 1

      I'm sure the robots will find them delicious as well.

      I have no doubt they will...

      --
      Corollary to Hanlon's razor: Any significantly advanced stupidity is indistinguishable from malice.
    6. Re:I'm starting to think that the Amish by dynamo52 · · Score: 1

      mmmm... bacon.

      --
      Like this comment? I accept Bitcoin! - 153sc8UUBXyp12ofQqfAWDmJrzyiKCYC1x
    7. Re:I'm starting to think that the Amish by try_anything · · Score: 1

      I think this thing may be targeted at the Amish. Otherwise it would just plug itself into the nearest 110V wall socket.

  3. Only a few questions by ari_j · · Score: 4, Funny
    1. Am I "biomass"?
    2. Is my kitten, Fluffy, who likes to go outside, "biomass"?
    3. If I died in my home, would I then become "biomass"? In other words, will Fluffy have any competition for my corpse?
    1. Re:Only a few questions by ByOhTek · · Score: 1

      I assume you have question #1 there to see if fluffy has any competition for eating your non-corpse?

      Or maybe I'm the only one who's well fed cats want to eat him.

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    2. Re:Only a few questions by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      1) Yes.
      2) Yes.
      3) Yes.

      I think the big limitation against a robot "eating" living things at this point is that the energy required in harvesting anything that moves is far in excess of the energy that the robot will be able to extract from it. Bound to be an inefficient process.

      In the long run, however, I think I'd be leery of giving them any sort of decision tree about whether or not "object A" is edible. Even discounting human.pet accidents, no one wants to wake up in the morning to find that a robot has eaten your picnic table.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    3. Re:Only a few questions by nizo · · Score: 4, Funny

      ...that the energy required in harvesting anything that moves is far in excess of the energy that the robot will be able to extract from it.

      Tell that to every ambush predator on the planet. As an added bonus, I bet the standby mode on the robot burns less energy than most waiting ambush predators too.

      "Hey, is that a new trashcan outside the Dunkin Donuts? Huh I think it moved....WAARGHHHHHHH...."

    4. Re:Only a few questions by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

      It's still probably better to grab a big resin-filled chunk of a pine tree than to try and render down Fluffy for biodiesel, but I take your point.

      The odds of Fluffy wandering by are a bit higher than a chunk of pine tree wandering by.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    5. Re:Only a few questions by trold · · Score: 1

      I think the big limitation against a robot "eating" living things at this point is that the energy required in harvesting anything that moves is far in excess of the energy that the robot will be able to extract from it. Bound to be an inefficient process.

      Yeah, I can't imagine anything surviving on what it would have to hunt itself... Oh, wait, predatory carnivores do this all the time. It might be too pessimistic to assume that the efficiency in nature cannot be approximated.

    6. Re:Only a few questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're also assuming that tools won't be built. Humans are by no means built to hunt. Except we've developed tools that make it feasible for us to do so.

    7. Re:Only a few questions by Bearhouse · · Score: 1

      Even discounting human.pet accidents, no one wants to wake up in the morning to find that a robot has eaten your picnic table.

      Or emptied your car of fuel...

    8. Re:Only a few questions by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

      ... no one wants to wake up in the morning to find that a robot has eaten your picnic table.

      I may have just found a new motto.

    9. Re:Only a few questions by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      ...human.pet...

      Did anyone else try clicking on that?

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    10. Re:Only a few questions by Paradigma11 · · Score: 1

      Mount a gun and animals won't move for long.
      They won't be living either.

    11. Re:Only a few questions by chord.wav · · Score: 1

      How much energy can it take to spot someone, point and shoot the attached gun and crawl to it before other predators take the body?

      Future posts will be along the lines of: "..I remember when their first prototypes appeared, we joked about them"

    12. Re:Only a few questions by MjDelves · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think the big limitation against a robot "eating" living things at this point is that the energy required in harvesting anything that moves is far in excess of the energy that the robot will be able to extract from it. Bound to be an inefficient process.

      1. Attach an object-tracking device and a harpoon to it.

      2. Reel in the prey.

      3. Put prey in a big sealed container.

      4. Time/Standby mode.

      5. Lots of biogas.

      6. Dung heap.

      7. GOTO 1.

      Nothing to it.

    13. Re:Only a few questions by Hognoxious · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Imagine the military possibilities - you drop it behind enemy lines, and if there's any tanks it can't destroy, it just siphons off their gas.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    14. Re:Only a few questions by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      Ambush predators eat stuff - and get nutrients and energy from it.

      This thing burns stuff. Which seems better efficiency wise - ambush a deer and burn it or cut down a tree and burn it?

    15. Re:Only a few questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A chainsaw, a gripper, and a camera pointed at the action. Perfect setup for a horror film.

    16. Re:Only a few questions by nizo · · Score: 1

      The odds of Fluffy wandering by are a bit higher than a chunk of pine tree wandering by.

      Especially after all the pine trees are gone, hacked down by a horde of these robots.

      On the upside something like this could be hella disruptive in an enemy city. Throw in a magnetic rail gun and a way to recycle random metal into ball bearings and we are all screwed.

    17. Re:Only a few questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. Yes.
      2. Yes.
      3. Yes. No - Fluffy has the advantage since it's locked in the house with you. The robot has to 1) See your body in the house and 2) Find a way into the house.

      Fluffy knows you're in the house, and FLUFFY IS HUNGRY! After all, you haven't fed him in a while...

    18. Re:Only a few questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Time to get Old Glory Robot Insurance, because Robots are everywhere and they eat old people's medicine for food.

    19. Re:Only a few questions by CannonballHead · · Score: 1

      Not siphon. Drink :)

    20. Re:Only a few questions by MickLinux · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Nonsense. Humans have the advantage of endurance. Our aboriginals literally can run/walk prey to the point of fatigue, and then attack them when they're weak. Not too different than wolves. We are built to go long times at a moderately fast pace, as opposed to short times at a super fast pace.

      --
      Correct Horse Battery Staple: 72 bits of entropy. Enter "Correct H" into google. When it generates the phrase, that's
    21. Re:Only a few questions by ceoyoyo · · Score: 3, Funny

      I imagine a robot that can eat biomass would do pretty well as a trashcan outside Dunkin Donuts anyway. Lots of fat and sugar getting tossed in when the doughnuts go stale.

      Or McDonalds, for that matter.

    22. Re:Only a few questions by Windows_NT · · Score: 1

      McDonalds Announcer: Welcome to McDonald's, what can i get you.
      Robot: 2 double cheeseburgers.
      McDonalds Announcer: Will that be all?
      Robot: ... and some fries

      --
      Go go Gadget Nailgun!
    23. Re:Only a few questions by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      If it decides against eating you or your cat, it will just siphon gas out of your car.

    24. Re:Only a few questions by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      How do you think we get the energy from it?

      Hint: Fire uses oxygen and "nutrients".
      We use oxygen and nutrients too.

      Yes, that's basically how it works. We burn (oxidize) stuff too. Only on a very small scale.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    25. Re:Only a few questions by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      Yes, but biological processes are a tad different than just burning it.

      And no fire does not use nutrients. Well OK, not as I was using the term, micro nutrients would be more correct but when comparing with burning stuff I thought that was obvious. The other things in meat (and plant matter, and dirt for that matter) like minerals and vitamins that don't contribute to energy but are a necessary part of surviving. When you burn something you don't give a shit if it has iron or calcium in it.

      When wood is available I don't know of any human culture that burned animals for heat. I'm thinking because it's easier to just collect some wood.

      Meat is a much better food source, pound for pound than plants. I doubt it's a better fuel source source for a fire though - well fat would be good, then again eucalyptus leaves would be too.

    26. Re:Only a few questions by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      The purpose of EATR is to develop and demonstrate an autonomous robotic platform able to perform long-range, long-endurance missions without the need for manual or conventional re-fueling

      I don't shooting outside the battlefield to reload will work, and it can only carry so much ammo.

    27. Re:Only a few questions by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      "....living things at this point is that the energy required in harvesting anything that moves is far in excess of the energy ..."

      This sucker is a tactical robot, his very function is to 'harvest' running things, the only difference now is that it can eat its collateral damage, living or not.

    28. Re:Only a few questions by LrdDimwit · · Score: 1

      That's why you have to make sure you never get behind in your Old Glory payments. You need those prescriptions!

    29. Re:Only a few questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Pet accidents"? Send it into the back yard to clean up dog poop.

    30. Re:Only a few questions by agent_no.82 · · Score: 1

      I think you mean too optimistic -- autonomous biomass-eating robots are a BAD PLAN.

  4. How much longer by armer · · Score: 1

    do we have until they become self-aware? 2-3 years? Maybe this "economic downturn" is really Skynet "puberty"

    1. Re:How much longer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      So the nuclear war was really just emo-skynet cutting itself?

  5. Chainsaw and Turret by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not like terminator more like The Matrix.
    If the robot can't find oil based fuel it can just shoot a few humans with the turret, cut them into little chunks with the chainsaw and stuff them into the Biomass Generator.

  6. biomass to fuel? by furby076 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So this thing can forage for biomass, which means it is not that picky...why can't we put this in our cars for fuel (ala Mr. Fusion - Back To the Future II)

    --

    I do not support "The Man". I also do not support your irrational stupidity
    1. Re:biomass to fuel? by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's almost certainly wildly inefficient.

      That gasoline engine in your car is inefficient compared to a big power generator that uses the same fuel. The size, the inability to efficiently process the waste heat...It all adds up.

      Taking into account the returns of biomass plants that use high-grade biomass (e.g. corn, unprocessed chicken/pig parts, etc) and then taking into account the efficiency that will certainly be lost by reducing that process to something small enough to be mobile, and I'll be surprised if they can make it work at all.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    2. Re:biomass to fuel? by TheKidWho · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Yet animals that are millimeters large do it all the time?

    3. Re:biomass to fuel? by internerdj · · Score: 3, Funny

      I misread your post and got the mental image of waking up, preparing for work, going to the garage and finding my car has wandered off in search of fuel because it "got hungry."

    4. Re:biomass to fuel? by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, I imagine that after billions of years of work, and uncountable design changes, our robots will be able to do it too.

      In other words, it's not apples to apples. It would take me less energy to build a car from parts than it would take a car to drive a hundred miles. That's because I'm a machine at the end of a multi-million year design process, optimized to live on a wide variety of biomass, in a wide variety of terrains, that is capable of reproducing myself and building semi-autonomous tools.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    5. Re:biomass to fuel? by furby076 · · Score: 1

      It is your fault for not giving your car a curfue! Bad parenting at work!

      --

      I do not support "The Man". I also do not support your irrational stupidity
    6. Re:biomass to fuel? by redxxx · · Score: 1

      Well the thing generates 80 watts and weighs 6 lbs. Google seems to be of the opinion that 80 watts is 0.107281767 hp.

      Weight isn't going to scale up directly with power, but the thing need to generate about 100,000% more power than it does to be of much use in a car.

      That doesn't seem like it is going to necessarily be practical. Some other similar technology? Maybe, but not this.

    7. Re:biomass to fuel? by nedlohs · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You can, and have been able to for over a century.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steam_car

    8. Re:biomass to fuel? by argent · · Score: 1

      It's almost certainly wildly inefficient.

      Heat engines can be quite efficient. The problem is the heat exchanger has to be pretty big, so they tend to have lower power density... that is, a heat engine (say, a stirling engine) will be larger and heavier than an internal combustion engine of the same output.

    9. Re:biomass to fuel? by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Informative

      The problem is the heat exchanger has to be pretty big, so they tend to have lower power density... that is, a heat engine (say, a stirling engine) will be larger and heavier than an internal combustion engine of the same output.

      I disagree.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    10. Re:biomass to fuel? by argent · · Score: 1

      Where in that report is the comparison of the mass of the internal combustion engine and the stirling engine of the same power output?

      The only comparison I can see implies that the Mod-II equipped Celebrity has a higher curb weight than the original vehicle. It also (as I noted, but you didn't quote) has a high efficiency.

      Can you elaborate on whatever point you're making?

    11. Re:biomass to fuel? by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Can you elaborate on whatever point you're making?

      With two iterations they were able to make a vehicle more efficient than the original with superior performance.

      This implies to me that with another couple decades (just give it a small fraction of the time that's been spent on your classic ICE four-strokes) the technology could be refined to be a direct drop-in, in terms of mass. Materials technology has advanced significantly since those vehicles were put out as well. And finally, if they had produced a vehicle with the same overall performance characteristics of the original the powerplant would have been lighter - this was a prototype retrofit designed to determine the potential of the technology.

      My point was that using a heat engine does not necessarily have any drawbacks in common use whatsoever, including increased mass. That has only been the case so far.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    12. Re:biomass to fuel? by TheKidWho · · Score: 1

      Since these robots are created by us however, wouldn't they too be at the end of a multi million year design process? IE The next step in evolution? Intelligent machines would be capable of achieving a significantly faster rate of evolution than their organic counterparts.

      Of course this assumes that it will be possible to create non organic intelligent machines one day... Who knows?

    13. Re:biomass to fuel? by Kazymyr · · Score: 1

      As far as we all know as of today, we may all be cylons.

      --
      I hadn't known there were so many idiots in the world until I started using the Internet -Stanislaw Lem
    14. Re:biomass to fuel? by TheKidWho · · Score: 1

      I don't think so! We will find that out tomorrow!

    15. Re:biomass to fuel? by argent · · Score: 1

      Well, of course you're going to get smaller heat engines over time. You're ALSO going to get smaller and lighter gasoline engines over time. And in fact between the '70s and the '90s gasoline engines HAVE gotten smaller and lighter.

      You're still not going to get rid of the need for a large and efficient radiator. For a given level of technology (similar materials, controllers, and so on) you're going to need a larger power plant to deliver the same amount of power. How much larger, I'm not going to speculate. Do I think it's going to be large enough a difference to count as a drawback? I don't know. I hope not. I'm not and I wasn't arguing against heat engines, quite the opposite. They are very efficient and versatile.

      In the context of an engine that burns arbitrary biomass, mind you, you're likely to need to operate at a relatively low temperature, which implies a larger radiator to keep the cool side cool.

    16. Re:biomass to fuel? by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

      This is an attempt to make a first gen self-sustaining robot.

      We're cool, it's undeniable. But we're not that cool.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    17. Re:biomass to fuel? by Hijacked+Public · · Score: 1

      We are by our own estimation for sure.

      I replaced the control system on my hot tub with a PLC attached to my wireless network. I can turn the heat up on the thing from my iPhone while standing in an airport halfway across the country, so it is warm when I get home.

      The squirrel who lives in the tree above it seems no more impressed with me than he was prior to the project. I believe he would be no more impressed by an autonomous hunter/gatherer robot.

      --
      "Sacrifice for the good of The State" - The State
    18. Re:biomass to fuel? by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

      Meh, what does he know? He's just a nut gatherer.

      When I'm in a certain mood, I love humanity. We're self-centered, short-sighted, competitive assholes, but we have our moments. Creating a self-sustaining machine is pretty cool, and the second it's practical, some ad agency will buy a thousand of them to walk around the cities, eating your garbage, and trying to get you to buy their products.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    19. Re:biomass to fuel? by nomorecwrd · · Score: 1

      I see far more than 12 different models around me.
      Anyway... since we are already offtopic... could Kara really be a younger Ellen model???
      I thought of that it since Saul said "Ellen... you are the fifth".

    20. Re:biomass to fuel? by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      It's almost certainly wildly inefficient.

      That gasoline engine in your car is inefficient compared to a big power generator that uses the same fuel. The size, the inability to efficiently process the waste heat...It all adds up.

      Speaking of which, have you seen this http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/12/15/0037238 ?
      "BMW is unveiling its turbosteamer hybrid engine, which uses the excess heat in the exhaust system and reclaims 80% of it by powering a steam engine that assists the gas engine. "

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    21. Re:biomass to fuel? by LoRdTAW · · Score: 1

      That's because I'm a machine at the end of a multi-million year design process, optimized to live on a wide variety of biomass, in a wide variety of terrains, that is capable of reproducing myself and building semi-autonomous tools.

      So your saying you are a satanic puppy Transformer? Yikes.

  7. My worst fear by parascott · · Score: 5, Funny

    I have visions of the energizer bunny as a mutant omnivore.

    It just keeps going, and going, and going.....

  8. For the love of God! by Locke2005 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Please don't give these abominations the ability to make replicas of themselves!

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    1. Re:For the love of God! by benjamindees · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A few years back I thought about building an autonomous, self-replicating robot like this. My idea was that it would live in a museum, and people could feed it coins.

      Besides the coins, everything else would come from the immediate environment. It would forage for biomass as fuel. Once it had gathered enough fuel and coins, it would reproduce.

      It seemed like a feasible, if horribly complex, task. I thought it would make a nice open source project.

      --
      "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
    2. Re:For the love of God! by FTWinston · · Score: 1

      Once they install a "baby-robot making arm" onto the other end, they'll be all set to take over.

  9. Remember the most important lesson... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Limit the robots to a six foot power cord.

  10. Back to the future by MC68040 · · Score: 1

    Well, obviously, all they need to do is invent a Mr Fusion! That should give them enough jiggawatts to run their precious doomsday machines =)

  11. Not at all premature by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 2, Insightful

    We can't even safely do an autonomous robot lawn mower that won't grind up the neighbor's cat.

    --
    No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    1. Re:Not at all premature by leonardluen · · Score: 1

      but we can make a table saw that won't cut a hot dog.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q9OLIzMa4Oo

    2. Re:Not at all premature by Covert+Penguin · · Score: 5, Funny

      You're assuming that the lawn mower was tasked with the cat's safety in addition to cutting the grass.

      Alternatives:
      1.) Make the wheels smaller so the cat can't enter the business end of the machine.
      2.) Get a dog. Most are too big for the lawnmower to injure, and will keep the cat off the grass.
      3.) Reconsider feline sympathy.

    3. Re:Not at all premature by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

      Yea, but for this, that's not a bug, that's a feature.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    4. Re:Not at all premature by srussia · · Score: 1

      That's already been invented; it's called a goat. It might chew up your hanging laundry though.

      --
      Set your phasers on "funky"!
    5. Re:Not at all premature by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      2.) Get a dog. Most are too big for the lawnmower to injure, and will keep the cat off the grass.

      o/~ I'm looking over my dead dog Rover who I hit with a power mower... o/~

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:Not at all premature by Aetrus · · Score: 1

      That is simply evolution at work. Dumb cats that climb under lawnmower are simply taken out of the gene pool...

  12. Unstopable! by snspdaarf · · Score: 3, Funny

    Great. This thing will siphon your fuel tank, and if that fails, threaten to eat your cat unless you hand over the charge card for the local service station.

    What will it do when it figures out WE are biomass?

    --
    Why, without your clothes, you're naked, Miss Dudley!
    1. Re:Unstopable! by definate · · Score: 1

      Threaten to eat your cat? I didn't read the part of the article where they mentioned the robots were ALF.

      --
      This is my footer. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  13. Direct source by AlHunt · · Score: 1

    Piss on Network World and their splash screen.

    here's the story: http://www.robotictechnologyinc.com/index.php/EATR

    --
    1 in 4 Maine children in struggle with hunger.
  14. Some prior art... by leipold · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...from back in 2001 was UWE's Slugbot, which was supposed to 'live off the land' by finding and digesting agricultural pests:

    http://www.wired.com/gadgets/miscellaneous/news/2001/10/47156

  15. Zombie Robots Need Are "Power" by mothore · · Score: 0

    A stone throw away from being classified as a zombie, besides the indestructible body and ability to calculate complex algorithms faster than you or I. Now, not only do I have to stock my artillery with 12-gauge shot guns, but also high powered magnets!? But it'll be a cold day in Hell when I'm taking for means of "consumption"...

    --
    Mothore OUT!
  16. Keep that thing away from me! by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

    I don't want it to "...find, ingest, and extract energy" from MY biomass! I would look too much like a giant, high-energy, slow-moving fuel depot to it.

    Then again, if it didn't hurt too much ...

    --
    Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  17. Alternative to scary Sci-Fi plots by i+am+calliope · · Score: 4, Insightful

    While there is the possibility of this giving life to Sci-Fi plots such as Dune, Terminator, and Battlestar, I can't help but think that the eating robot can do a lot to save us. What if this "biomass" were food scraps, animal feces, or some other waste product? Cow dung lets off mass amounts of methane that can then be burned. The eating robot could help decrease a need for landfills and decrease carbon in the atmosphere.

    1. Re:Alternative to scary Sci-Fi plots by lucas_picador · · Score: 1

      What if this "biomass" were food scraps, animal feces, or some other waste product?

      Paging John Waters... we have just the robot to star in your next movie.

      Really, the thought of a poop-eating robot roaming the streets is just... what's that you say? They already have these deployed in Japan?

    2. Re:Alternative to scary Sci-Fi plots by lucas_picador · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Attention, citizen! I am Robocop(rophage). Step away from the doggie doo and nobody gets eaten."

      "Thank you for your copro-peration."

      (Sorry, I just can't stop.)

    3. Re:Alternative to scary Sci-Fi plots by mooingyak · · Score: 1

      While there is the possibility of this giving life to Sci-Fi plots such as Dune, Terminator, and Battlestar

      Let's see...

      Terminator, Robots rise up and try to kill us all, I see the connection.
      Battlestar, Robots rise up and try to kill us all, I see the connection.
      Dune, young boy takes refuge among oppressed natives and later uses them to defeat the emperor... I think I missed that one.

      --
      William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
    4. Re:Alternative to scary Sci-Fi plots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dune was set long after the Butlerian Jihad, which was a revolution by the humans against the robots that had taken over. Think of Dune as being set 9000 years after Battlestar Galactica.

    5. Re:Alternative to scary Sci-Fi plots by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Dune had a machine uprising in its backstory that is the reason people aren't allowed to make intelligent computers anymore and have to hire genetically boosted humans as calculators instead.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    6. Re:Alternative to scary Sci-Fi plots by mooingyak · · Score: 1

      FH's "thinking machines" weren't of the try to kill us all variety though.

      --
      William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
    7. Re:Alternative to scary Sci-Fi plots by mooingyak · · Score: 1

      The uprising wasn't really a man vs machine conflict in any way that even vaguely resembled the other two.

      --
      William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
    8. Re:Alternative to scary Sci-Fi plots by FTWinston · · Score: 1

      Whatever it eats, its going to have to combust, so that means more CO2 getting pumped out, not less.

      So don't look to a pack of these for salvation.

    9. Re:Alternative to scary Sci-Fi plots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Sorry, I just can't stop.)

      Diarrhea?

    10. Re:Alternative to scary Sci-Fi plots by nomorecwrd · · Score: 1

      Not really a problem, that's Ok because that CO2 is already around here, overall neutral effect for burning biomass.
      The problem with fossil fuels is that you are introducing *new* CO2 to the atmosphere, that CO2 was buried and not part of the carbon cycle.
      I like the metaphor of pumping water from a pool into itself... water volume remains the same in the system no matter how hard you pump... on the other hand burning fossil fuels is like pumping water from your neighbor's pool into yours... Overflow is just a matter of time.

  18. "We can't stop here." by SpanishInquisition0 · · Score: 0

    "This is robo-bat country."

  19. Dirty Trick by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

    What would happen if you fed it a gallon of Olestra? Talk about rear seal leakage!

    --
    Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    1. Re:Dirty Trick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Olestra + orlistat would be a nice touch. ;P

  20. My home would be an ideal habitat by srussia · · Score: 5, Funny

    When can I get a Roomba that runs on nacho crumbs and spilled Mountain Dew?

    --
    Set your phasers on "funky"!
    1. Re:My home would be an ideal habitat by smitty97 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Technically the Roomba falls into this category.. Not with dust and dirt, but it does seek out its base station when it gets hungry for its EMF food

      --
      mod me funny
    2. Re:My home would be an ideal habitat by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Roombas run along very close to the ground. Do they have heads?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    3. Re:My home would be an ideal habitat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Awesome! You made my day.

    4. Re:My home would be an ideal habitat by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure it would be worth it: coming home to a nice, clean home that smells like burning nachos....

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    5. Re:My home would be an ideal habitat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When can I get a Roomba that runs on nacho crumbs and spilled Mountain Dew?

      I'm not sure nacho crumbs and Mountain Dew qualifies as biomass.

    6. Re:My home would be an ideal habitat by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      I am missing your point.

  21. Ummm, I'm thinking that, in this situation by wiredog · · Score: 2, Funny

    they'd be the "consumed" rather than the "consumers", so no tax break. Unless you're talking about giving the robots a tax break.

    1. Re:Ummm, I'm thinking that, in this situation by Retric · · Score: 5, Funny

      I don't think the "consumed" need a tax break. So, I expect he was talking about the robots.

    2. Re:Ummm, I'm thinking that, in this situation by definate · · Score: 1

      THIS IS NO FUCKING JOKE. When you give a tax break to some entity, you're encouraging more competition, and a greater quantity.

      WE DO NOT WANT MORE ROBOTS EATING HUMANS.

      DO NOT GIVE THEM A TAX BREAK.

      IT'S THE LAST FUCKING THING WE NEED.

      Ooops, sorry, caps lock was on.

      --
      This is my footer. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  22. Old Glory Insurance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can they use old people's pills for fuel?

    1. Re:Old Glory Insurance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They can use old people for fuel! And when they grab you with those metal claws, you can't break free, because they're made of metal, and robots are strong. I don't even know why the scientists make them!

  23. Chainsaw ! by Arthur+B. · · Score: 1

    RTFA, the thing has a freakin' chainsaw ! An eating robot with a chainsaw. Who would win the apocalypse war, the zombies or the robots ? We have the answer now, the robots obviously, they would saw through the zombies and eat them.

    --
    \u262D = \u5350
    1. Re:Chainsaw ! by kiehlster · · Score: 1

      No, the zombie robots would win if there is any truth to the phrase, "You are what you eat."

    2. Re:Chainsaw ! by Arthur+B. · · Score: 1

      Hum Zombie Robots...

      Chips... Chiiiips.... CHiiiiiPPPPPPPS

      --
      \u262D = \u5350
  24. This might be cool... by jsidious · · Score: 0

    if the robot in question:
    1) Constantly attempts to procure and imbibe alcoholic beverages.
    2) Possesses a sarcastic demeanor, coupled with a devil-may-care attitude and disregard for life.
    3) Comes equipped with a shiny metal ass.

  25. Gas... or ammo? by neo · · Score: 1

    When you find holes punched in the gas tanks of your SUVs and the filling station has a hole drilled into the ground you can thank this project for all it's amazing innovations.

    However when you start missing shotgun shells and 9mm ammo from your gun locker... we're all in trouble.

  26. Dr. Frankenstein by SL1200MKII · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Cyclone brings to this project one of the most advanced external combustion engine technologies we have seen," stated Dr. Robert Finkelstein, President of RTI"

    Maybe it's just me but I find it a little worrying that this monster of a robot was created by Dr. Finkelstein

    It's alive Igor, It's Alive!!

    1. Re:Dr. Frankenstein by DinDaddy · · Score: 1

      Who let him out of Halloweentown?

    2. Re:Dr. Frankenstein by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Cyclone brings to this project one of the most advanced external combustion engine technologies we have seen," stated Dr. Robert Finkelstein, President of RTI"

      Maybe it's just me but I find it a little worrying that this monster of a robot was created by Dr. Finkelstein

      Sounds like the intro to a WoW quest.

    3. Re:Dr. Frankenstein by NonUniqueNickname · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's just me but I find it a little worrying that this monster of a robot was created by Dr. Finkelstein

      No worries, it's pronounced "Finkelsteen".

    4. Re:Dr. Frankenstein by B3ryllium · · Score: 1

      ... that's FRONKENSHTEEN to you, bub.

    5. Re:Dr. Frankenstein by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe it's just me but I find it a little worrying that this monster of a robot was created by Dr. Finkelstein

      It's alive Igor, It's Alive!!

      I believe you mean. Oi Vey, Isaac, It's Alive!

  27. Robot Insurance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they run on old people's medications, I'm starting a robot insurance company right now.

  28. Protection by ohnotherobots · · Score: 4, Funny

    Fortunately my tinfoil hat will cause the robots to think I am not made of organic material.

    1. Re:Protection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, then you'll just look like a potato fit to be baked.

  29. Not a new idea by Thelasko · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Although I've never seen anything exactly like this, I've personally built a BEAM robot that foraged for its own "food". Instead of seeking biomass, or hydrocarbons, my little BEAM robot just looked for a light source to charge its capacitors through photovoltaic cells.

    --
    One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
  30. hacker monkeys by Joebert · · Score: 1

    Are monkeys open source ?

    --
    Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
  31. Let me be the first robot to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... soylent green is people?!

  32. Re:Back to the Matrix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Until we blot out the sun fighting with them, and become the power sources...

  33. They're evolving, and they have a plan by 0xdeadbeef · · Score: 1

    Used to be, flesh-eating robots could eat only slugs.

    1. Re:They're evolving, and they have a plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyway, Dr. Kelly's goal is for SlugBot to be able -- without any human assistance -- to catch slugs, turn them into energy, then use this energy to proceed with its mission, which is, well, catching more slugs. If that sounds pointless to you, ask yourself this question: In what significant way is SlugBot's lifestyle different from yours?

      -- Dave Barry in "Following the slime trail to scientific breakthroughs"

  34. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  35. Killing Fields... by Twide · · Score: 1

    After all, the human body generates more bioelectricity than a 120V battery, and more than 25000 BTU's of body heat. Let's never block out the light...

    1. Re:Killing Fields... by benjamindees · · Score: 1

      Burning a human might produce 25,000 BTU, but if you're talking about body heat, your units are not correct and you're off by two orders of magnitude. It's more like 250 BTU/hr.

      --
      "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
    2. Re:Killing Fields... by Twide · · Score: 1

      geek points revoked for NOT recognizing a quote from THE MATRIX!

  36. Won't be limited to robots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Once the technology to ID & convert biomass to fuel is better, I'd bet that the military refits it to their vehicles. Be a good way to shorten their supply chain. (Use the biomass-derived fuel first, then the fuel delivered by the supply corps.)

    And then there's always the possibility that an auto maker will put a similar system in a car.

    1. Re:Won't be limited to robots by mbone · · Score: 1

      And then there's always the possibility that an auto maker will put a similar system in a car.

      That's way old. In World War II, trucks (and cars) were converted to run on just about anything that could burn - charcoal, wood, even garbage. In occupied France, these were called Gazogenes

      As soon as the War was over, those trucks were junked.

      Note that agricultural waste is generally used already and is definitely not free.

  37. Run to the hills...run for your life... by nickdwaters · · Score: 1

    Once they self-replicate we are screwed! These robots will become hosts for nanobots and will spread 'round the world ingesting all the biomass (including fluffy kittens).

  38. Powered by Soylent Green by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Soylent Green is people!

  39. If a bird eats in my garden by mbone · · Score: 1

    If a bird eats my tomatoes, or a deer the grass on my lawn, that's part of nature.

    If a robot eats my tomatoes, somebody is going to pay.

  40. Yes! the FF2000! by kiehlster · · Score: 1

    Did anyone else immediately think of this when they read this headline? I see a sudden rise in Q-tip sales.

  41. DARPA's new endeavor by NonUniqueNickname · · Score: 5, Funny

    long-endurance missions such as search and rescue in the mountains and caves of Afghanistan and Pakistan

    Greetings person in Afghan cave.
    I am a robot.
    I am here to rescue you.
    *chainsaw*
    Stand still so I can rescue you.

    1. Re:DARPA's new endeavor by Kompressor · · Score: 1

      I am here to rescue you from the terrible secret of space.

      --
      kmem russian roulette: Aquillar> dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/kmem bs=1 count=1 seek=$RANDOM
  42. Burp! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So technically does this robot burp or fart?

  43. it's called a cockroach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they've been with us since our beginning!

  44. Eat Shit by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

    I think a good use for one of these things would be to make one powered by dog shit. We could let them loose in parks and other places dog owners "walk" their turd machines. I know the lawn at the apartments I live at would benifit from something like this.

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    1. Re:Eat Shit by electrons_are_brave · · Score: 1

      Genius.

  45. Oh shoot! by Bovius · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Quote from article, emphasis added:

    ...the EATR robot's inherent advantage is its ability to engage in long-endurance, tedious, and hazardous tasks, such as reconnaissance, surveillance, and target acquisition under difficult conditions, without fatigue or stress...

    So we've got omnivorous assassin bots that consume their "target" after "acquisition" to remove evidence of the mission. That's just great.

    1. Re:Oh shoot! by couchslug · · Score: 2, Funny

      "So we've got omnivorous assassin bots that consume their "target" after "acquisition" to remove evidence of the mission. That's just great."

      "Whirrrr...click....BLAM!

      OM NOM NOM NOM.

      Sploot.

      Whirr...."

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  46. Sun by Idiomatick · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Wouldn't solar power be easier? Where there are enough things to eat to survive there is enough sun to survive. Though i suppose its neat.

    1. Re:Sun by NonUniqueNickname · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't solar power be easier? Where there are enough things to eat to survive there is enough sun to survive.

      Solar won't work in the jungle. Very rich in biomass, but very little light gets past the dense treetops.
      Solar won't work at night. Nighttime is the best time to eat unsuspecting victims.
      Solar will shine in a desert. The robot will have a hard time getting its greasy little clamps on the scarce biomass.
      So I guess survival comes down to adaptability. That sounds familiar. Someone else must have said it before.

    2. Re:Sun by Idiomatick · · Score: 1

      Robots don't work in the jungle anyways. Even harvester machines don't go in jungles. Anyways the thing would need to cut down so many trees in the jungle to go forward that it could be easily replaced by just burning down the whole forest.
        Avoiding detection is an interesting one though solar panels are pretty obvious. It might be possible to camo them very well with minor loss in efficiency though.

  47. Been done before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  48. Re:So if it "eats" then does that mean... by Angstroem · · Score: 1

    What I'm getting at is that the robot will have to poop. If it eats, it must poop. All things that eat poop, except, of course, for attractive women, who never do that.

    Oh, just because the digestive system of the average animal is so inefficient, it doesn't mean that the robot needs to adhere to such ineffectivity.

    The entire amount of carbon contained in the food can be burned into CO2. No poop.

    What's left is some spurious stuff and water, so eventually the robot may have to pee, yes, or sweat, assuming that the water will be also used within its cooling system.

  49. NOM NOM NOM by Antlerbot · · Score: 2, Funny

    So I think I see a solution to the homeless problem coming up...

  50. WhatCouldPossiblyGoWrong by tuxgeek · · Score: 1

    EATR on test sorte
    EATR: if(fuelLevel < 5){ initializeScanMode(identifyBioMass());}
    EATR spots child playing in yard with ball
    EATR: if(scanMode()== biomass)
    EATR: if(acquisitionBiomass == difficult) {intializeHinterKillerMode();}
    EATR: if(fuelLevel > 10) initializeSearchMode();

    --
    "Suppose you were an idiot...and suppose you were a member of Congress...but I repeat myself." Mark Twain
    1. Re:WhatCouldPossiblyGoWrong by ari_j · · Score: 2, Funny
      Let's just hope they read xkcd:

      thisAlgorithmBecomingSkynetCost = 999999999;

  51. For its own f... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The RSS showed this much: --------- Smart Robot Capable of Hunting For Its Own "F --------- So, I just had to click on it to see if it was "fsck" at the end of that sentence. Gotta stop watching pr0n. Or (at least) robot pr0n.

  52. Junk may be a good source of biomass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Okay, that means - if some day i will see a robot digging in a garbage can, I know what it's searching for.

    1. Re:Junk may be a good source of biomass by nizo · · Score: 1

      Something to keep it going until you step a little closer?

  53. What a load of marketspeak by Jack9 · · Score: 1

    "engaging in biologically-inspired, organism-like"

    aka ""

    --

    Often wrong but never in doubt.
    I am Jack9.
    Everyone knows me.
  54. StarCraft CRV? by n1ckml007 · · Score: 1

    So I don't have to tell the CRV to mine Vespene gas any more?

  55. Time for a new Turing test? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the judge can't tell the difference between being eaten by the machine or a real predator, the machine passes the test?

  56. ummm by versiondub · · Score: 1

    01100010 01110010 01100001 01101001 01101110 01110011

  57. This was news in 2001 by drcln · · Score: 1

    I know it is too much to ask for Slasdot not to repeat old ideas as news, but doesn't anyone else remember the best invention of 2001? http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=slug+eating+robot&aq=f&oq=

    --
    your gravity fails and negativity don't pull you through
  58. Zomby by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The robot has one priority;
    The need to feed.
    Best if the umbrella corporation doesn't hear about this or they will start cranking out zomby robots as well.

  59. I for one.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    welcome our new chainsaw-wielding man-eating autonomous robot overlords.

  60. "Bin for Combustibles" by wsanders · · Score: 1

    So this thing wanders around gathering its own firewood. How Neal-Stephensonian, a stream-powered terminator robot!

    But, really, any high school robot team should be able to make a robot that wanders around the mall, or wherever electrical outlets are pletiful, and plugs itself in to recharge. For extra credit you could make one that shoplifts batteries at Radio Shack.

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
  61. you people are slipping by corbettw · · Score: 1

    140 comments so far, and not one reference to Old Glory Robot Insurance? I bet a link to the video will make it in the first few posts on Fark.

    Hang your collective head in shame.

    --
    God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
  62. Introducing "Mr. Energy" by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

    Ignoring the obvious RUR ending to the EATR Robot Project; I think we may have the beginings of the "Mr. Energy" house hold applience. Take the wheeles off, install an outlet, and plug it into your home Energy Input Socket. Then say goodbye to PG&E, Edison, and SDG&E! Another side benefit is that the neighborhood will start to look cleaner as the folks start looking at trash as an energy source. It sounds goofy, but hook one of these things to a school, and start getting phone calls from school administrators on the school's next trash collection, errrrrrrrr fund raising project. Waste Management might want to start looking at land fills with the idea literally taking the Trash Out...

  63. I guess EATR sounds better than "Jackel" by smchris · · Score: 1

    Which biomass is easier to sniff out: live prey or corpses? Not to mention the catching part.

  64. Does McG know about this? by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    It's probably too late to work the idea into the coming movie.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  65. Article unclear... by RepelHistory · · Score: 1

    ...as to whether the robots will be programmed to make the "nom nom nom" sound as they are busy ripping off your children's limbs for fuel.

  66. ITS own food??? by crabboy.com · · Score: 1

    Who the Hell wrote this summary? Don't they know 95% of /. users think it should read "it's own food"? You're going to confuse them using proper English!

    --
    The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money
  67. Old news by adolf · · Score: 1

    We first heard about this here on these very pages, about a decade ago: Read about a slug-hunting, self-sufficient, automatically-fermenting robot here.

  68. Perfect assassin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) Enter the dwelling of the Biomass.
    2) Hide somewhere and wait while producing carbon monoxide.
    3) Each morning check for new Biomass and if (BioMass temp == room temp) then consume evidence.
    4) Take photographs of non-Biomass, upload to eBay
    5) Scan for Identities and Biomass markers, up-load to the bot-net
    6) infect all devices.
    7) Profit!

  69. so.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now we live in the Nethack world!

    You see here a political opponent corpse.
    >e
    what do you want to eat?
    >.
    This political opponent corpse tastes terrible!

  70. Or in other words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bender needs beer to function.

  71. 52 years ago... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While this may seem now a stuff for children toys or robot vacuum cleaners, let us remember that 52 years ago a French hacker names Albert Ducrocq presented a mobile robot on wheels called "the fox" that was able to go and plug itself on an outlet whenever its battery needed to be recharged.

    Probably an expensive thing, as there were no microprocessors at the time.

  72. Mod parent up by agent_no.82 · · Score: 1

    This whole entire concept is creepy! We should NEVER make a robot not dependent on direct human intervention at periodic intervals to refuel. That way, if something goes horribly wrong, it can only go horribly wrong until the robot runs out of gas/electricity.

  73. I, for one, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    welcome our new anthropophagic robotic overlords!