That is incorrect. You always own the source unless you are providing work for hire. Eg. a photographer owns the photos even if the were shot for a company.
The obvious question beccons: "where is the replacement".
I've certainly seen this trend and been filled with rage and anger after a great/helpful question was closed for being open ended. I believe it had 4 possible resolutions based on my knowledge of the subject matter and I would have loved to have seen those 4 answers posted.
Apple and MS both have vast tracking tools as well. They just are vast within a small empire. Google has a much larger online empire and therefore more capabilities to track you.
It's delightful but you seem to have missed the point. I am saying that people are free to fix bugs at their leisure for FOSS projects, for enterprise applications you are not permitted (usually) to fix a bug because it exists. You have to prove that there is a value add from fixing the bug and that value add cannot be that it makes your life easier (unless you can provide quantitative measures of productivity increase)
Correct, as a developer I'd like to fix bugs in my enterprise level software but the overhead required to do so is high enough to outway the benefits.
On the other hand, if you are a developer for a FOSS project you are able to correct broken code at your leisure, submit it for peer review and have it accepted. The overhead is still there but it's spread out to feel less visible (IMHO). I'm perfectly fine writing a fix and having it be rejected for being inadequate. I'm less okay with spending 4 hours having people sign things so that I can correct a defect that takes 2 minutes of development work.
Sadly this will be the solution. Make it so unthinkable to try and find vulnerabilities that nobody does it. Except those whom are willing to use them maliciously and willing to pay the price for their noncompliance.
Google Desktop search was by far one of the best tools for desktop searching I've ever used. I really actually enjoyed the integration into my normal search results (when it worked).
Samsung, one of the (if not THE) leaders in display manufacturing technology, could not find a profitable way to make these things. And now Amazon - an internet ecommerce website that has zero manufacturing experience or capacity - wants to see if it can do any better?
Perhaps Amazon is one of the only clients of this firm. After all the type of displays they make are ereader displays. It would cut Amazon's overhead by having their own manufacturing and give Samsung capital to hire more lawyers.
Their downloading service should just be a Torrent wrapped around an encrypted bundle, thus their download servers see no impact. Hell using amazon aws for distribution would give them seed boxes.
That is the official site. When you click download it comes up with some sliders saying support for features etc. there is a click through at the bottom but it's not immediately obvious you don't have to pay.
Slashdot Mirror
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zN9LZ3ojnxY
That's funny I'm in Calgary alberta and it tells me in fahrenheit
I completely forgot to click the "Post Anonymously" button -.-
AC is now the proud owner of facebookwifinetwork.com and facebook-wifi-network.com.
as a software developer I will refer you to the dictionary for the word `overhead` and dilbert for a business case example.
Publishers rejoice as student are once again forced to purchase new books.
That is incorrect. You always own the source unless you are providing work for hire. Eg. a photographer owns the photos even if the were shot for a company.
The obvious question beccons: "where is the replacement".
I've certainly seen this trend and been filled with rage and anger after a great/helpful question was closed for being open ended. I believe it had 4 possible resolutions based on my knowledge of the subject matter and I would have loved to have seen those 4 answers posted.
Apple and MS both have vast tracking tools as well. They just are vast within a small empire. Google has a much larger online empire and therefore more capabilities to track you.
black-i-droid
So hows that Kool-Aid?
It's delightful but you seem to have missed the point. I am saying that people are free to fix bugs at their leisure for FOSS projects, for enterprise applications you are not permitted (usually) to fix a bug because it exists. You have to prove that there is a value add from fixing the bug and that value add cannot be that it makes your life easier (unless you can provide quantitative measures of productivity increase)
Correct, as a developer I'd like to fix bugs in my enterprise level software but the overhead required to do so is high enough to outway the benefits.
On the other hand, if you are a developer for a FOSS project you are able to correct broken code at your leisure, submit it for peer review and have it accepted. The overhead is still there but it's spread out to feel less visible (IMHO). I'm perfectly fine writing a fix and having it be rejected for being inadequate. I'm less okay with spending 4 hours having people sign things so that I can correct a defect that takes 2 minutes of development work.
Propietary defects are ones that may cause financial harm. FOSS defects are ones that cause annoyance.
I know that our code has more defects than we'd consider fixing purely because the CBA isn't there.
This is exactly my thought. True or not Taiwan has too much invested in HTC to care if samsung is actually guilty.
Sadly this will be the solution. Make it so unthinkable to try and find vulnerabilities that nobody does it. Except those whom are willing to use them maliciously and willing to pay the price for their noncompliance.
Google Desktop search was by far one of the best tools for desktop searching I've ever used. I really actually enjoyed the integration into my normal search results (when it worked).
I do see your concern though.
Cue the Fandroid apologists.
Phandroid checking in.
Shit can't be fixed if the vendor is shit. Get a Nexus device and always have a secure fucking awesome device.
Samsung, one of the (if not THE) leaders in display manufacturing technology, could not find a profitable way to make these things. And now Amazon - an internet ecommerce website that has zero manufacturing experience or capacity - wants to see if it can do any better?
Perhaps Amazon is one of the only clients of this firm. After all the type of displays they make are ereader displays. It would cut Amazon's overhead by having their own manufacturing and give Samsung capital to hire more lawyers.
Funny what happen to the MOD API.
appathy
Even at 70cad I'd buy it for its components. At 13cad I'd by a few
Their downloading service should just be a Torrent wrapped around an encrypted bundle, thus their download servers see no impact. Hell using amazon aws for distribution would give them seed boxes.
Where do Swedish people hide their money?
That is the official site. When you click download it comes up with some sliders saying support for features etc. there is a click through at the bottom but it's not immediately obvious you don't have to pay.
Are you measuring acceleration of of calculations? TF already contains a time unit.
Check out udacity courses. They are by far the best online courses I've seen covering many topics.