The real points here are not with the recorded sound quality, but with the listened sound quality. If you insist in using earpieces, noisy environments, low attention and MP3-like sources, the vinyl ain't any better than a 192 kHz MP3. And it loses quality play after play. If you instead use high end speakers in adequately insulated rooms and keep your attention to the sounds you're are listening to, than maybe the first plays on a vinyl will make some difference. But also SACD and DVD-Audio can do the same while retaining its quality forever (thanks to the copies you can make). So, in the end, why vinyl? Just because of marketing hype!
C'mon! The tool to reduce storage costs it's you, the system designer. Not the distribution. If the storage is local or remote and you pay by size), you reduce the costs at the design stage. Once you have bought those 4 disks, you cannot reduce their costs any more. If the storage is remote and you pay by use, you cannot reduce costs after deployment. Only increase. If deduplication is the keywork to "to reduce storage costs", then you'd better think: why do I need deduplication?
No way, data compression is the only way to reduce storage costs if you are dumb. Good design is the real way to do things.
Slashdot Mirror
They are from somewhere else!
Inmates' phones are inherently different from civilians!
Aren't they?
And preserve itself. It's already been told!
I can run Linux programs inside an operating system based on ... Linux.
It's a good solution for server installation!
Time to switch it off.
Or no care for their own privacy?
The real points here are not with the recorded sound quality, but with the listened sound quality.
If you insist in using earpieces, noisy environments, low attention and MP3-like sources, the vinyl ain't any better than a 192 kHz MP3. And it loses quality play after play.
If you instead use high end speakers in adequately insulated rooms and keep your attention to the sounds you're are listening to, than maybe the first plays on a vinyl will make some difference.
But also SACD and DVD-Audio can do the same while retaining its quality forever (thanks to the copies you can make).
So, in the end, why vinyl? Just because of marketing hype!
With all that garbage you stuffed into Win10, I think you'd do much better!
Despite supposed piracy! Interesting!
As some are having their BSOD
A 15" laptop is made mostly by empty space.
A 15" screen should be no less than 2K. Most of them is instead less than FHD.
Cash is for those who need to hide something.
... because Cook says that's what users want!
Instead of saying what you think they'd answer?
We have much fewer boats than cars over a surface that much larger than all the streets put together.
The possibility of a shipcrash are much lower.
I won't ever punch a security hole in my privacy!
C'mon!
The tool to reduce storage costs it's you, the system designer.
Not the distribution.
If the storage is local or remote and you pay by size), you reduce the costs at the design stage. Once you have bought those 4 disks, you cannot reduce their costs any more.
If the storage is remote and you pay by use, you cannot reduce costs after deployment. Only increase.
If deduplication is the keywork to "to reduce storage costs", then you'd better think: why do I need deduplication?
No way, data compression is the only way to reduce storage costs if you are dumb.
Good design is the real way to do things.
This company is really committed to comp.sci. advancement!
"tools to reduce storage costs"
I am looking forward...
Why not Google?
Why not, when the users are the merchandise?
If you ever used Facebook. Period.
Is it that difficult to understand?