Is it that hard to conceive? Any electronic communication is intrinsically unsuitable. On either end there needs to be a moment when the information is plain text readable, thus copyable, thus insecure. If I can gain control of your end device, I can read it.
Even DHT (and similar) are unsuitable for the same reasons. Maybe you get "in transit" confidentiality. But just that.
You'd better meet your correspondent in a crowded and noisy place, change position frequently and talk by whispers while covering your mouth. And maybe you'll get private communication.
Tanenbaum was indeed right as far as the security is concerned. Torwalds was indeed right as far as the performances are concerned. Maybe it's time to consider (again) L4.
Welcome to the mobile widespread censorship and monitoring. If you'll be able to effectively use TOR, VPNs and full cryptography, then maybe you won. Otherwise, you lost.
You could destroy anything you find in the name of the future. You could save anything you find in the name of the past. Or you could find some balance in between in the name of the present.
So you are saying there's no way to slip into the official package system or the official software repository. Cool. We'd need to have that everywhere, then!
If you read the mailing lista thread you understand where the real problem is.
"Users should check what they install". What's been tour latest package check? Have you checksummed tour ISO download?
And why shouldn't I check the downloafs from the ma in website? Because of trust? There fan always ne a crack I can use to slip into, if I have enough motivation.
I think the whole system is screwed up. I think "we can't rewind we've gone to far".
Who ever has seen a netstat or ifconfig run taking more than a second or two? Unless you put them in a tight loop, you won't ever notice the difference in the load of the system.
Slashdot Mirror
Is it that hard to conceive?
Any electronic communication is intrinsically unsuitable.
On either end there needs to be a moment when the information is plain text readable, thus copyable, thus insecure.
If I can gain control of your end device, I can read it.
Even DHT (and similar) are unsuitable for the same reasons. Maybe you get "in transit" confidentiality. But just that.
You'd better meet your correspondent in a crowded and noisy place, change position frequently and talk by whispers while covering your mouth. And maybe you'll get private communication.
Can you show us those cameras have no security hole punched in?
Could you please show us the code?
Millions? I think the Linux kernel code is under the eyes of no more than 200 persons. And only a dozen in its full extent.
A really smart hacker could sneak a subtle vulnerability by spreading it in different code areas.
When the code counts by millions of lines, open source is not a direct implication of security.
Tanenbaum was indeed right as far as the security is concerned.
Torwalds was indeed right as far as the performances are concerned.
Maybe it's time to consider (again) L4.
Why noto plain SSH TCP forwarding?
Welcome to the mobile widespread censorship and monitoring.
If you'll be able to effectively use TOR, VPNs and full cryptography, then maybe you won.
Otherwise, you lost.
It's caring about stupidity and money.
So it's space economy because we put something in the space?
I thought it was when we'll put someone in the space.
You are breaking the EULA.
This is a very good move!
Next time Microsoft will use MSI to provide wallpapers a audio notification too.
And web pages...
You could destroy anything you find in the name of the future.
You could save anything you find in the name of the past.
Or you could find some balance in between in the name of the present.
Maybe it could be for opensource stuff.
But not for everything.
And, did I already say "no"?
Mankind fan ne really stupid.
But if you dug all those shiny crystals their value would rapidly approach zero.
They simply will say "we won't".
That's the business, baby!
So you are saying there's no way to slip into the official package system or the official software repository.
Cool.
We'd need to have that everywhere, then!
If you read the mailing lista thread you understand where the real problem is.
"Users should check what they install". What's been tour latest package check?
Have you checksummed tour ISO download?
And why shouldn't I check the downloafs from the ma in website? Because of trust?
There fan always ne a crack I can use to slip into, if I have enough motivation.
I think the whole system is screwed up. I think "we can't rewind we've gone to far".
https://lists.archlinux.org/pi...
They can be less authentic, more false to themselves. It's a matter of personalities, non persons.
Estimated accordingly to which values?
Anything else, like adding wires in the walls is nonsense.
It won't ever work!
Who ever has seen a netstat or ifconfig run taking more than a second or two?
Unless you put them in a tight loop, you won't ever notice the difference in the load of the system.
Nonetheless I don't spend time in this foolish stuff. Just slashdot.
What does this mean?