agree that they have made a good attempt at integration and have some good ideas about useability, BUT their latest creation Visual Studio.NET leaves something to be desired. I spend more time trying to work around bugs in the IDE that I do debugging my applications. I've also spend more time conversing with MS support personal about their bugs than I care to admit. The funny thing is that the MS support guys readily admit VS.NET is a POS and that companies should move from VS.NET to VS.NET 2003 beta as soon as possible if they wan to avoid these bugs.
Not really, I spend more time trying to work around bugs in the IDE that I do debugging my applications. I've also spend more time conversing with MS support personal about their bugs than I care to admit. The funny thing is that the MS support guys readily admit VS.NET is a POS and that companies should move from VS.NET to VS.NET 2003 beta as soon as possible if they wan to avoid these bugs.
I agree that they have made a good attempt at integration and have some good ideas about useability, BUT their latest creation Visual Studio.NET leaves something to be desired. I spend more time trying to work around bugs in the IDE that I do debugging my applications. I've also spend more time conversing with MS support personal about their bugs than I care to admit. The funny thing is that the MS support guys readily admit VS.NET is a POS and that companies should move from VS.NET to VS.NET 2003 beta as soon as possible if they wan to avoid these bugs.
Your right this "WAS" pretty big news yesterday morning when it came out and it is actually important to take not of. It points out how hypocritical M$ and their affiliates really are. First M$ took BSD code and made it a critical part of the M$ OS, now M$ affiliates just use BSD code without shame.
When I was in school I can't remember that last time I pirated a copy of Linux, gez maybe that's because it's reasonably priced for students as well as professionals. Now I'm not saying all software should be free, but back in the day it wasn't worth it to pay a hundred dollars to M$ for a piece of software the blue screened more often than not. Same went for Mathmatica.
If all plagiarized material belongs (Turnitin.com) to them are, does that make they legally responsible (liable) for it? Can the person who was plagiarized sue them?
You could always argue you didn't use the software, instead a person could say they where looking over the shoulder of someone who was. Therefore you wouldn't be bound by the EULA.
Slashdot Mirror
Sounds like one monopoly enabling another.
Take a 101 class is economics then reply again and use something besides anonymous. It will give a little credit to you statement.
Since he caused the recession
is a jackass plain and simple
www.fuckmicrosoft.com is what I use for M$ support
agree that they have made a good attempt at integration and have some good ideas about useability, BUT their latest creation Visual Studio.NET leaves something to be desired. I spend more time trying to work around bugs in the IDE that I do debugging my applications. I've also spend more time conversing with MS support personal about their bugs than I care to admit. The funny thing is that the MS support guys readily admit VS.NET is a POS and that companies should move from VS.NET to VS.NET 2003 beta as soon as possible if they wan to avoid these bugs.
Not really, I spend more time trying to work around bugs in the IDE that I do debugging my applications. I've also spend more time conversing with MS support personal about their bugs than I care to admit. The funny thing is that the MS support guys readily admit VS.NET is a POS and that companies should move from VS.NET to VS.NET 2003 beta as soon as possible if they wan to avoid these bugs.
I agree that they have made a good attempt at integration and have some good ideas about useability, BUT their latest creation Visual Studio.NET leaves something to be desired. I spend more time trying to work around bugs in the IDE that I do debugging my applications. I've also spend more time conversing with MS support personal about their bugs than I care to admit. The funny thing is that the MS support guys readily admit VS.NET is a POS and that companies should move from VS.NET to VS.NET 2003 beta as soon as possible if they wan to avoid these bugs.
I wouldn't let the retards at microsoft work on any more code for the IDE. Then at least it wouln't get any worse.
I'm with black logic, Let start screwing the big man.
Your right this "WAS" pretty big news yesterday morning when it came out and it is actually important to take not of. It points out how hypocritical M$ and their affiliates really are. First M$ took BSD code and made it a critical part of the M$ OS, now M$ affiliates just use BSD code without shame.
Way to be on top of this one boys. I submitted this one yesterday and was rejected. It's old news now.
Next the RIAA will try and shutdown AOL IM for allowing users to share files.
When I was in school I can't remember that last time I pirated a copy of Linux, gez maybe that's because it's reasonably priced for students as well as professionals. Now I'm not saying all software should be free, but back in the day it wasn't worth it to pay a hundred dollars to M$ for a piece of software the blue screened more often than not. Same went for Mathmatica.
If all plagiarized material belongs (Turnitin.com) to them are, does that make they legally responsible (liable) for it? Can the person who was plagiarized sue them?
I'd like to see all the ideas and segments of code they've taken from others (*NIX) through the years and put into the M$ OS.
You could always argue you didn't use the software, instead a person could say they where looking over the shoulder of someone who was. Therefore you wouldn't be bound by the EULA.