Because this app doesn't allow her to really communicate, the only thing it does is voicing a number of words depicted by pictograms, basically it's just a fancy fart app.
Seriously, if the kid is mute she should have been taught sign language from day one, then she wouldn't be in the position of being unable to communicate at the age of three.
While an independent Internet would be the best thing that's not going to happen anytime soon. Until then, securing our rights country after country is a reasonable compromise.
In your own forums you aren't required to provide anonymity, nor are you banned from using moderation. Making anonymity illegal everywhere because you can't handle your village forum is overextensive.
Exactly, harassment is already a criminal offence, and contrary to libel it's not a violation of fre speech. But this case provides a perfect strawman for British politicians to tighten once again what their citizens can say.
The difference is that in a video game you don't want the npc you just shot to act too human. Games depicting the death struggle of fallen opponents are already disturbing.
Also, with his type of reasoning game development is unethical because it causes violent behavior. This is just shallow generalisation, not every project funded by the military is for killing people, not every financial institution is unethical and not every medical development requires animal testing (if you are writing software you will most likely work on the gadgets not the new medications).
A government spends years of research and lots of money to develop a malware. They deploy it and it causes the damage they were hoping for. The problem is, unless the malware is very specific, the target can now copy it and shoot it back at them. Which is why the "cyber arms race" is not like the nuclear arms race, but more like the gas weapon arms race in WW1: if you deploy your weapon before developing sufficient protection against it, you will hurt yourself just as much as you hurt the enemy. So if the parties involved behaved rationally, the race would be about finding weaknesses then simultaneously patching them and developing exploits for them.
This is my worry with global warming; that good science is not being done. There are two sides arming themselves with "the truth". One of these sides is correct.
I'm not that sure. When one side is talking about 6-10 degrees of warming and the other claiming that the climate is actually cooling, I have trouble believing that any politically motivated scientist can aquire the truth in this matter. I think your view of climate is cynical, there are still true uncorrupted scientists in climate research, it's just they are the less loud as they aren't backed by the media of a political side.
This is a wrong analogy for many reasons. First, particle physics is easily testable, while climate predictions are either hard to test or are far in the future. Second, if I remember right the leader of the OPERA experiment was forced to resign, not something that happens often in climate science. Third, particle physics is apolitical, while climate science sadly is thoroughly tainted with politics. Which is why trust in climate scientists has eroded, and with many being funded by interested parties to deliver bogus research the curiosity about funding is understandable. On the other hand, CERN has been always completely open about their finance. I haven't heard of email subpoenas and I seriously doubt that they are common in climate debates, but I'm open to read your citations if you can provide any.
Slashdot Mirror
Because this app doesn't allow her to really communicate, the only thing it does is voicing a number of words depicted by pictograms, basically it's just a fancy fart app.
RTFA, she has physical problems not mental ones.
Seriously, if the kid is mute she should have been taught sign language from day one, then she wouldn't be in the position of being unable to communicate at the age of three.
Exactly, which is why an independent Internet could only be ensured by international treaties, and there is no political will in any country for that.
While an independent Internet would be the best thing that's not going to happen anytime soon. Until then, securing our rights country after country is a reasonable compromise.
Excellence in anything, including smarts can easily boost one's ego to the point where it cloudstheir judgement.
€50 billion won't nearly be enough for those 960000 new lawyers!
In your own forums you aren't required to provide anonymity, nor are you banned from using moderation. Making anonymity illegal everywhere because you can't handle your village forum is overextensive.
Exactly, harassment is already a criminal offence, and contrary to libel it's not a violation of fre speech. But this case provides a perfect strawman for British politicians to tighten once again what their citizens can say.
The difference is that in a video game you don't want the npc you just shot to act too human. Games depicting the death struggle of fallen opponents are already disturbing.
The same evidence the article provides: correlation.
In the original sense of the word, forcing someone to give you their money is textbook piracy.
Also, with his type of reasoning game development is unethical because it causes violent behavior. This is just shallow generalisation, not every project funded by the military is for killing people, not every financial institution is unethical and not every medical development requires animal testing (if you are writing software you will most likely work on the gadgets not the new medications).
So, did he use truecrypt?
This is Europe not America.
A government spends years of research and lots of money to develop a malware. They deploy it and it causes the damage they were hoping for. The problem is, unless the malware is very specific, the target can now copy it and shoot it back at them. Which is why the "cyber arms race" is not like the nuclear arms race, but more like the gas weapon arms race in WW1: if you deploy your weapon before developing sufficient protection against it, you will hurt yourself just as much as you hurt the enemy. So if the parties involved behaved rationally, the race would be about finding weaknesses then simultaneously patching them and developing exploits for them.
As long as democracy remains, it will work the same as it does today: a huge governmental sector will employ these people giving them some alibi jobs.
This is my worry with global warming; that good science is not being done. There are two sides arming themselves with "the truth". One of these sides is correct.
I'm not that sure. When one side is talking about 6-10 degrees of warming and the other claiming that the climate is actually cooling, I have trouble believing that any politically motivated scientist can aquire the truth in this matter. I think your view of climate is cynical, there are still true uncorrupted scientists in climate research, it's just they are the less loud as they aren't backed by the media of a political side.
This is a wrong analogy for many reasons. First, particle physics is easily testable, while climate predictions are either hard to test or are far in the future. Second, if I remember right the leader of the OPERA experiment was forced to resign, not something that happens often in climate science. Third, particle physics is apolitical, while climate science sadly is thoroughly tainted with politics. Which is why trust in climate scientists has eroded, and with many being funded by interested parties to deliver bogus research the curiosity about funding is understandable. On the other hand, CERN has been always completely open about their finance. I haven't heard of email subpoenas and I seriously doubt that they are common in climate debates, but I'm open to read your citations if you can provide any.
Selling stuff with boobs and using hostesses on events is not unique to the tech industry.
Usually when illegal material is found on a server hosted by an Internet company and is removed,
If content can be illegal and be removed, the system is already broken.
Ever wonder what they think of their jobs?
I couldn't care less. Why is this on Slashdot again?
The only thing from Gattaca that seems close is the technology, society is still very far from that.
We are lost.
Would you download a village?