Would Michael have posted this if Bush was in the lead?
Who cares? It's news. Michael is just some guy who posts stories on Slashdot. I really don't think that determining what his political views are is nearly as important as determing who is going to be the next President of the United States.
Nope. I want the borders open to those who wish to become U.S. citizens.
to stop the tired hungry and poor from taking your job away because they are better qualified (not that hard when competing against you) and are more motivated.
My job could not be taken by by a non-U.S. citizen. It's code-monkeys like you who have to worry about being outsourced. My concern is that the economy is being harmed by outsourcing, not that my job is in danger.
So Bloomberg runs a perpetual OP-ED website.
No, Bloomberg runs a business-oriented website. Like the Wall Street Journal, they publish both news and editorials. In the case of the copyrighted news article that you posted, they quoted someone from The Heritage Foundation without taking an editorial position as to whether his take was correct or incorrect.
I guess this proves without a doubt who is the stalker. What makes you think this pisses me off?
Because I heard the hysterics in your voice when I called you before.
Proving me right and your[sic] forever wrong yet again.
You're just a waste of my time. You won't debate like an adult. You lie and get caught at it over and over. Every time, you try to change the subject or you call me names. Perhaps later I'll put up a list of all of the lies you told in this thread. It might be amusing.
Remember this one "Never worked at Apple in my life." Sure, John.
Most of your thoughts on the gun control issue is simply you infringing on my right to bear arms. There is no time - you dont ask that I lock my assault weapons in a locker on Sunday. No, you grab them and take them away.
When did any assault weapons ban take guns away from you? When did federal agents show up to confiscate any gun you owned? More lies and distortions.
You never read the Federalist papers, and you have misrepresented the framer's intent, but why on earth do you think that after Amendment 1 comes Amendment 2? Why? Because the framers thought of those two rights as the most important.
And neither is without limitation. You can't scream "Fire!" in a crowded theatre. You can't use free speech as a defense when you reveal state secrets to foreign nationals. You can't falsely accuse someone of being a necrophiliac.
"The great object is that every man be armed . . . Everyone who is able may have a gun." (Patrick Henry, in the Virginia Convention on the ratification of the Constitution.)
Convicted felons and those who convicted of domestic violence will rejoice in that opinion, but it was one man's thoughts, not the law of the land. That's like quoting Kerry's interpretation of a law and declaring that interpretation as law.
Lies. 175,000 people do no arrive every month. Ding, tiwsted liar.
No, a mistake. Unlike you, when I make mistakes, I admit it. In 2003, just over 700,000 legal immigrants arrived in the U.S. Illegal immigrants is a huge number, also, though.
No, a bunch of people who, unlike you, rnu businesses that dont fail, like yours, and give out factual data through Bloomberg, a recognized source of quality information.
You don't seem to understand the difference between a quote and an editorial. When Bloomberg quotes someone from The Heritage Foundation, they are reporting that the person said something, not that what they said was factually correct.
>These are the top ten states rated by percentage of residents over 25 with bachelor's degrees or higher and who they voted for:
1 Colorado Bush
Massachusetts Gore
Maryland Gore
Virginia Bush
Connecticut Gore
Minnesota Gore
New Hampshire Bush
New Jersey Gore
Vermont Gore
New York Gore
And now for the bottom ten states (those with the smallest percentage of residents over 25 with bachelor's degrees or higher):
Wyoming Bush
Kentucky Bush
Alabama Bush
Idaho Bush
Nevada Bush
South Carolina Bush
Mississippi Bush
Arkansas Bush
Indiana Bush 50 West Virginia Bush
So it looks like Gore was the strong favorite in states where the population was educated while Bush was the candidate of choice in states where education was low.
They've both been accused of corruption, clamping down on free speech, and tampering with elections. The big difference is that Putin still thinks that the war on Iraq was wrong.
I know what you are up to, you neo-Nazi loser. You announce that you are Jewish and then play into all of the bigoted stereotypes about Jews being obnoxious, arrogant, thinking they are better than everyone else, etc. in order to foment anti-semetism. Well, it won't work with me because I know way too many Jewish people to fall for your little scheme. Unlike you, they are decent, respectable people.
Sherlock. Wow, you are a "finder" aren't you?
It was easy. You have a unique combination of irrationality, ignorance, bigotry, paranoia, and cowardice.
There was only a bust for the incompetent or those seeking VC money. Real engineers always had a job the whole time. That wouldn't be you.
You aren't a "real engineer." You are just a low-level coder boy. Don't flatter yourself.
Only a fucking drooling mongoloid idiot would assume someone saying "OPEC" sells meant it literally.
Don't blame me for your inability to express yourself clearly. And please stop using offensive ethnic slurs, Nazi-boy.
No, you support anti-nuclear candidates.
But you lied and said that *I* protested nuclear power.
No information on retirements, no information on the fact less people are going into engineering now and the last few years. No fresh blood plus retirements. Simple.
Yes, you are simple if you believe that 15% of software engineers retired in one quarter. Moron.
Theresa giving to terrorist organizations is illegal in my book. A quick search of any news sources will highlight these blnuders[sic].
No links. These are just numbers. Balderdash. Poppycock. Lies.
You provide no links because you are lying and no reputable links support your lies.
Your 45 mpg is your feel good excuse, no one cares what you do - it isn't fixing the problem.
Yes, it is fixing the problem. It's reducing world demand for oil.
Bush and Kerry saw the same intelligence. Kerry authorized force.
Kerry authorized Bush to use force in the hopes that Bush would be smart enough to use it to pressure Saddam.
His own medals. His own betrayal of America, his own voting record.
Kerry earned medals in Vietnam. Bush had daddy pull strings to keep him out of 'Nam, went AWOL from the Air National Guard, got busted for DUI, and snorted crack cocaine. And he's your boy!
No, the UN is perfectly happy doing nothing. People like you kick and scream like fucking pussies every time someone goes to free oppressed people an/or get resourced for the economy you leech off of.
Nice try at ducking the point, but Bush/Cheney are letting genocide occur in Darfur because there is no oil there. You may support attacking sovereign nations to steal their natural resources, but I do not.
Doesn't fix the root power problem. Foolish ignoramus response. You would fuck the working class you claim to love the MOST with this ridiculous elitist bullshit philosophy. How they supposed to get to work, Daddy Warbux?
By purchasing fuel-efficient cars, moron. That reduces demand, which results in lower oil prices.
Let's get one thing straight, you are the liar and the fact twisting sicko here, not me.
Nice try, but I caught you in yet another lie.
If it was economical, it would be competing already.
So why is Bush spending our tax money on hydrogen fueled cars? If they were economical, they would be competing already. People don't tend to buy cars that use biodiesel if biodiesel isn't readily available. Fuel station owners aren't going to sell biodiesel if there isn't much demand. That's why tax incentives can get the ball rolling -- much as Bush claims to be doing with hydrogen-fueled vehicles.
Oct. 31 (Bloomberg) - U.S. employers probably added 175,000 workers to payrolls in October, the most in five months,
That's not even enough to keep up with immigration to the U.S. Nice try.
"according to a report from Tim Kane and Rea Hederman, analysts at the Heritage Foundation,
The Heritage Foundation's "mission" from their own web site:
Founded in 1973, The Heritage Foundation is a research and educational institute - a think tank - whose mission is to formulate and promote conservative public policies based on the principles of free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national defense.
In other words, a bunch of right-wing assholes with a goal of promoting the Republican agenda.
Good job Sherlock, you uttered on of the most common English names ever.
Okay, then how about John C. Randolph (jcr@_INSERTED_TO_PREVENT_SPAM_idiom.com -- because, unlike you, I am not a dick). Sound a bit closer?
Open. Failed. Closed. Simple. To the point.
It's not failed if it made money, which it did. I could have kept it open had I chosen to aggressively pursue clients, but I had the business acumen to know that I was better off waiting out the tech sector bust in a W2 job and then reopening my consulting business.
OPEC doesn't have any effect on pricing. Yeah right. Your stupidity amazes me to no end.
You're the fucking idiot who first called OPEC a "nation" and then said that OPEC sells oil. It does not. It controls price and supply but does not sell anything.
You have supported people who oppose nuclear power. There is no question, this is by self admission.
You lied and said that *I* protested nuclear power. No, I never admitted anything of the kind, you liar.
None of which you can cite, none that cant be shown to show anything arbitrary by the survey taker.
The IEEE-USA analyzed BLS numbers and reported the following high-tech employment trends on July 26:
* The number of employed software engineers in the U.S. dropped from 856,000 in the first quarter of 2004 to 725,000 in the second quarter.
* The number of computer scientists and systems analysts dropped from 672,000 in the first quarter to 621,000 in the second. An average of 722,000 people were employed as computer scientists and systems analysts during 2003.
* The number of people working as computer programmers dropped from 591,000 in the first quarter to 575,000 in the second.
* The number of employed computer hardware engineers dropped from 86,000 to 83,000 from the first quarter to the second.
Kerry and Heinz stretched the legality of their deductions.
If they are illegal, prove it or STFU
The only charities he has given to is to Vietnam's communist party and through Theresa, several organizations linked to terrorism.
You lie and fabricate. Show any evidence for your statement, liar. In his 2003 federal return, Kerry reported charitable donations of $43,735 on a total income of $395,338. In 2002, Kerry made charitable contributions of $18,600 on a total income of $144,091. In 2001, Kerry gave $22,370 to charity on a total income of $137,499. In 2000, he gave $19,221 on a total income of $137,012. And in 1999, he contributed $21,955 to charity on a total income of $140,928. That's a lot better than the donations you have made to Israeli terrorist organizations.
Flawed thinking. Saddam was ineffectively punished by the UN and the oil flow was down and there is a resource war going on because of people like you who consume.
My VW Golf diesel gets 45mpg. What does your car get? As to your claim, why did oil prices skyrocket since our war on Iraq if it was just normal global demand for oil?
But Saddam would still be in power, and murdering people.
So you think it's fine for a President to lie in order to get support for wars that he wants to wage? Since you are someone who blatantly lies for personal gain, I'm not surprised that you'd take that view.
The UN is watching people get murdered in Darfur, they do nothing to stop murderers.
You'll notice that Darfur has no significant quantities of oil, so Bush and Cheney are perfectly happy ignoring the genocide there.
You create a demand for that resource.
As do you. And I'm willing to pay for it. If it goes to $8/gallon, I'll pay for that oil and won't recommend sucking our reserves dry while oil is still available on the world market.
You are a hypocrite to say you do not demand these products,
That was just another of your lies since I never said anything of t
Here we have a story about a brilliant young woman and and the first thing you do is ask for pictures of her? Maybe asking for pictures of her is your first instinct, but it is not mine. Mine was to do a Google image search...
Failures in business don't qualify for honorary degrees. Sorry.
I never failed in business. I opened a consulting business, raked in money for quite a few years, and closed the business down when I took W2 employment. I do not need the dick stroking of an honorary degree to validate my life.
Never worked at Apple in my life.
Sure John, whatever you say. Enjoy your little fantasy life and your imaginary company.
Not its a consortium of oil producing nations. You might want to find out the member states, you obviously don't know.
You were the one who said "Oil is commodity sold by OPEN[sic] and other nations." You didn't say "Oil is sold the the members of OPEC and other nations." And, by the way, OPEC doesn't sell oil.
The people you support protest nuclear power.
So first you lie and say that I protested nuclear power when I did not. Then when confronted, you claim that people I support protest nuclear power. Kerry's Web site states that "nuclear power can play an essential role in providing affordable energy while reducing the risk of climate change." His aides also say he is for nuclear power.
I know of no people with high tech expertise out of a job right now.
That says a lot about how few people are willing to deal with someone like you since tech sector unemployment is higher now than it has been in decades according to reputable statistics and analysts.
So it's okay to tax the rich more because they can afford it while your poster boy, Kerry, uses tax shelters?
Yes. Anyone, including you, is entitled to legally write off certain types of investments. If you put money into a 401K, that's a tax shelter and it's not "hiding" anything. John Kerry is for policies that will raise his taxes far more than yours. Unlike you, he's interested in the long-term good of the country, not just his own wallet. What's next? Criticizing him for writing off his charitable donations?
So we should just act like Neville Chamberlain and appear the Muslim terrorists, the new Hitler incarnate (who was a gun grabber like Kerry).
As the 9/11 panel stated in their report, Iraq had nothing to do with the terrorist attacks of 9/11. Nor was Iraq linked to sponsoring Al-Qaeda. Face it: We attacked a sovereign nation, killing countless thousands of civillians, based on lies about "weapons of mass destruction." Now they hate us and that's doing more to fuel terrorism than anything else. In fact, there were more terrorist attacks last year than in any year in the past according to the government's own numbers.
We should have acted in concert with the U.N. and our allies. U.N. weapons inspections were taking place and our allies voted in favor of continuing those inspections. We should have let them run their course. Had we done that, we would have learned that there were no WMDs and could have avoided a war. But Bush wanted to attack and wasn't going to wait until his concocted reason for attacking was proven to be false.
There is an oil crisis looming and the US attempts to secure a huge oil field for long term strategy and you people bitch and whine.
It's just a giveaway to oil companies. Bush wants to hand over drilling rights in Alaska so that oil firms can sell the oil on the world market to the highest bidder. If China is willing to pay more, then the oil will go from Alaska to China. There's no guarantee that the oil will only be sold in the U.S. or that U.S. citizens will pay below-market rates for the oil extracted from those publically owned lands. The U.S. Geological Service says the amount of oil that could be recovered profitably in ANWR is roughly 3.2 billion barrels -- a six-month U.S. supply. Moreover, it would take 10 years for that oil to reach the pump, and even when production peaks in the year 2027, the refuge would produce less than 2 percent of the oil Americans are expected to use that year.
That's why the NAACP is so strongly in favor of the GOP, eh?
Kerry is a flip flopping liar that betrayed America in Vietnam,
Kerry was honored for his service in Vietnam while Bush was getting arrested for DUI. Bush had daddy pull strings to keep him from going to 'nam and then he went AWOL, never fulfilling his commitment to the Air National Guard. Something about mandatory drug testing seemed to make him nervous. Like you, he's a coward.
You do not possess an engineering degree. No accredited institution has awarded you a degree in engineering, nor have you passed any of the engineering tests to become a certified engineer nor to you belong to IEEE.
The best and brightest didn't need degrees when I got into the field. Just ask Wozniak or Gates. I dropped out of college to do software engineering on Near Infrared Spectrophotometers using state of the art development tools (in-circuit emulators, high-speed scopes, high-end compilers and assemblers, etc.).
People like me control people like you because we are your intellectual masters and your arguments here make that easy to see.
You are just another drone at Apple, one of hundreds, if not thousands, of coders. You'll always be that -- just a "bit player" if you will.
've never heard of the nation of "OPEN." OPEC. Sorry you can't use context to figure out meanings. I always thought you were that dumb.
I always knew that you were so stupid that you thought that OPEC was a nation.
Lies. Liberals are the champions of resisting nuclear power. You protested it.
No, I never protested it. You are a liar.
The economy has grown.
In what sense of the word? Jobs? No. Wages? No.
Wealthy people already pay the bulk to the taxes. If you cut taxes across the board, the people who pay the most get the most back.
And they don't spend it. That's why across-the-board tax cuts don't work to stimulate an economy.
Your friends, and John Kerry's friends, the terrorists, did that. Not Bush.
Bush attacked Iraq, not Kerry. Bush bombed the pipelines, not Kerry. Bush provoked the terrorists, not Kerry.
They volunteered to subject themselves to the possibility of being called to arms. The armed forces may be doing something unpopular, but it wasn't illegal to use the reserves.
I didn't say that it was illegal. I said that it hurt businesses.
Simple Economics shows that retooling GM's plant that makes 30 million cars a year will cost a too much to make the resulting cars affordable.
Gee, then how did American car companies thrive after CAFE was enacted?
If you want affordable fuel efficient cars, you will have to let financial experts plan it out, not reckless failed businessmen like yourself
You don't even have a business. You're just a drone working at Apple and will never have your own business.
By the way, less than 25% of the petrol used is from vehicles on the road. The rest is burned by heavy industry, and consumers like yourself drive that demand. Too bad you cant blame that on Bush either.
I already did. Rather than pushing nuclear (or "nuc-u-lar" as you ignorant conservatives say), you right-wingers resisted efforts to impose tougher pollution limits on oil burning powerplants so that they could remain in operation.
The drugs are cheap in Canada because the Canadian taxpayer SUBSIDIZES the cheap drug.
You really are completely ignorant, aren't you? The drug prices are not subsidized. They are negotiated by the government as part of the socialized medicine there.
Anti Americanism is simply the King of the Hill effect. You cant make the RoW happy by licking their boots, you must beat them. We have the largest economy in the world, second to only former enemies of ours, Japan and Germany namely. If you think the US is destined for failure, put your money where your mouth is - remind yourself you failed at business - and sell America short.
My business made me hundreds of thousands of dollars and I shut it down voluntarily with no monetary losses when the economy turned sour for software consulting. I do invest heavily in overseas companies and they are helping my stock portfolio immensely right now.
AIDS can and has spread from one person to another via ALL body fluids including tears.
The NIH and CDC disagree with you.
And I laugh as I got paid to harass you sitting on the computer unemployed.
Better luck next time, Johnny. I'm employed as I do this but I'm not so stupid as to use my employer's equipment and network to post messages. That's something that Apple's lawyers and/or HR people will explain to you in the near future (if they have not already). In fact, I'll probably get paid a whole lot more for your postings than you got paid to make them.
I laugh at you, pitiful "engineer" You lie, you never got an engineering degree. You call yourself something you are not and never will be.
So, is Steve Wozniak not an engineer either? You had to get a degree because you were not smart enough to write software without someone holding your hand and teaching you how. Like the guy who started your company, I had brains and talent, so I was hired away from college by a firm making Near Infrared Spectrophotometers.
So now you claim jurisprudence means that you can look in unrelated case law for contextual definition of words to effect your current case?
There was no "contextual definition" of anything. There was a recognition, by the court, of the concept of "limited infringement."
You wrote: "There is no degree of infringe. Either you are defined as infringing or not. There is no partial infringement or limited infringement."
In an earlier post, you wrote: "Now, I consider "shall not be infringed" to mean nothing else but what it says. Specifically, that means "without limitation".
I proved that the legal system recognizes that the word "infringe" is not a "boolean." I don't need to find a case about gun control to prove that. All I have to do is find any legal case in which the court recognizes the concept of partial or limited infringement. I did that. Now it's your job to find one which supports your position. Good luck.
Nothing like a little right-wing bigotry and homophobia.
Watch the little twit flip out when Bush wins next Tuesday.
Bush will probably win because education levels are dropping. In Bush/Gore, Bush was the overwhelming favorite in the states with the lowest education level while Gore took those with the highest.
Prove a negative? Prove that colon cancer can't be spread that way. Prove that sickle cell anemia can't be spread that way. Prove that diabetes can't be spread that way. Prove that Parkinson's can't be spread that way. You can't prove a negative and you can't lock up every person in the world who gets a disease.
As a group, Jews educate themselves.
You are proof-positive that not all Jews educate themselves. Your bigoted ignorance about HIV/AIDS, and other subjects, is proof of that -- as is your (at best) semi-literate writing.
We are killed most often by partials such as yourself.
I am your intellectual superior in every sense of the word. I am more intelligent than you are. I am more educated than you are. I am more logical than you are. That has been shown over and over.
I know you, Kerry and other liberals and Trial Lawyers are into double speak and twisting the meanings of words to get your way,
What I quoted to you was a decision by a state Supreme Court, not something from a politician or "trial lawyer." That was a decision from the Justices of the court and it clearly shows that the concept of "limited infringement" is legally recognized. I had many other examples which I could have provided, but you won't consider them because they contradict what you want to believe.
From HIV Infection and AIDS, An Overview, NIAID Fact Sheet: NIAID, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892:
"Although researchers have found HIV in the saliva of infected people,
there is no evidence that the virus is spread by contact with saliva. Laboratory studies reveal that saliva has natural properties that limit the power of HIV to infect. Research studies of people infected with HIV have found no evidence that the virus is spread to others through saliva by kissing."
"Scientists also have found no evidence that HIV is spread through sweat, tears, urine, or feces."
"Studies of families of HIV-infected people have shown clearly that HIV is not spread through casual contact such as the sharing of food utensils"
Now, don't you feel like a total fucking idiot? You should.
Also, the Jews were called a menace by people like you, diseased or not. Being smarter causes that response.
So you're claiming that Jews are smarter -- sort of some kind of 'master race.' Interesting.
Slashdot Mirror
Would Michael have posted this if Bush was in the lead?
Who cares? It's news. Michael is just some guy who posts stories on Slashdot. I really don't think that determining what his political views are is nearly as important as determing who is going to be the next President of the United States.
Now you want to close the borders
Nope. I want the borders open to those who wish to become U.S. citizens.
to stop the tired hungry and poor from taking your job away because they are better qualified (not that hard when competing against you) and are more motivated.
My job could not be taken by by a non-U.S. citizen. It's code-monkeys like you who have to worry about being outsourced. My concern is that the economy is being harmed by outsourcing, not that my job is in danger.
So Bloomberg runs a perpetual OP-ED website.
No, Bloomberg runs a business-oriented website. Like the Wall Street Journal, they publish both news and editorials. In the case of the copyrighted news article that you posted, they quoted someone from The Heritage Foundation without taking an editorial position as to whether his take was correct or incorrect.
I guess this proves without a doubt who is the stalker. What makes you think this pisses me off?
Because I heard the hysterics in your voice when I called you before.
Proving me right and your[sic] forever wrong yet again.
You're just a waste of my time. You won't debate like an adult. You lie and get caught at it over and over. Every time, you try to change the subject or you call me names. Perhaps later I'll put up a list of all of the lies you told in this thread. It might be amusing.
Remember this one "Never worked at Apple in my life." Sure, John.
Most of your thoughts on the gun control issue is simply you infringing on my right to bear arms. There is no time - you dont ask that I lock my assault weapons in a locker on Sunday. No, you grab them and take them away.
When did any assault weapons ban take guns away from you? When did federal agents show up to confiscate any gun you owned? More lies and distortions.
You never read the Federalist papers, and you have misrepresented the framer's intent, but why on earth do you think that after Amendment 1 comes Amendment 2? Why? Because the framers thought of those two rights as the most important.
And neither is without limitation. You can't scream "Fire!" in a crowded theatre. You can't use free speech as a defense when you reveal state secrets to foreign nationals. You can't falsely accuse someone of being a necrophiliac.
What a presumptious little man you are.
I'm a bigger man than you are.
"The great object is that every man be armed . . . Everyone who is able may have a gun." (Patrick Henry, in the Virginia Convention on the ratification of the Constitution.)
Convicted felons and those who convicted of domestic violence will rejoice in that opinion, but it was one man's thoughts, not the law of the land. That's like quoting Kerry's interpretation of a law and declaring that interpretation as law.
Lies. 175,000 people do no arrive every month. Ding, tiwsted liar.
No, a mistake. Unlike you, when I make mistakes, I admit it. In 2003, just over 700,000 legal immigrants arrived in the U.S. Illegal immigrants is a huge number, also, though.
No, a bunch of people who, unlike you, rnu businesses that dont fail, like yours, and give out factual data through Bloomberg, a recognized source of quality information.
You don't seem to understand the difference between a quote and an editorial. When Bloomberg quotes someone from The Heritage Foundation, they are reporting that the person said something, not that what they said was factually correct.
Bush attacked Kerry as a tax-and-spend liberal
Better to have a tax-and-spend liberal than a borrow-and-spend Republican.
Look at the facts from the 2000 election:
>These are the top ten states rated by percentage of residents over 25 with bachelor's degrees or higher and who they voted for:
1 Colorado Bush
Massachusetts Gore
Maryland Gore
Virginia Bush
Connecticut Gore
Minnesota Gore
New Hampshire Bush
New Jersey Gore
Vermont Gore
New York Gore
And now for the bottom ten states (those with the smallest percentage of residents over 25 with bachelor's degrees or higher):
Wyoming Bush
Kentucky Bush
Alabama Bush
Idaho Bush
Nevada Bush
South Carolina Bush
Mississippi Bush
Arkansas Bush
Indiana Bush
50 West Virginia Bush
So it looks like Gore was the strong favorite in states where the population was educated while Bush was the candidate of choice in states where education was low.
They've both been accused of corruption, clamping down on free speech, and tampering with elections. The big difference is that Putin still thinks that the war on Iraq was wrong.
But you try hard to "out" people you dont like on the internet by trying to find thier "real identity" when you lose arguments.
No, I find out the identity of people who are posting slander and lies about me so that I can contact them to try to settle the matter civilly.
But since you have already accused me of trying to "out" you, I'll do just that:
John C. Randolph
Work E-mail: jcr@apple.com
Home E-mail: jcr@idiom.com
Work phone: (408) 974-8819
I'd post your home address and phone number, but I don't want your family to suffer any more for their association with you.
Good. Maybe that will counter some of the Republican intimidation of black voters and the illegal efforts to refuse people their right to vote.
If you aren't a coward hiding behind "fmaxwell," reveal your true name and city and state. If you are such a man, do that.
So that you can stalk me? You aren't even man enough to post under a consistent pseudonym and you want me to tell you where I live? You're on drugs.
I know what you are up to, you neo-Nazi loser. You announce that you are Jewish and then play into all of the bigoted stereotypes about Jews being obnoxious, arrogant, thinking they are better than everyone else, etc. in order to foment anti-semetism. Well, it won't work with me because I know way too many Jewish people to fall for your little scheme. Unlike you, they are decent, respectable people.
Sherlock. Wow, you are a "finder" aren't you?
It was easy. You have a unique combination of irrationality, ignorance, bigotry, paranoia, and cowardice.
There was only a bust for the incompetent or those seeking VC money. Real engineers always had a job the whole time. That wouldn't be you.
You aren't a "real engineer." You are just a low-level coder boy. Don't flatter yourself.
Only a fucking drooling mongoloid idiot would assume someone saying "OPEC" sells meant it literally.
Don't blame me for your inability to express yourself clearly. And please stop using offensive ethnic slurs, Nazi-boy.
No, you support anti-nuclear candidates.
But you lied and said that *I* protested nuclear power.
No information on retirements, no information on the fact less people are going into engineering now and the last few years. No fresh blood plus retirements. Simple.
Yes, you are simple if you believe that 15% of software engineers retired in one quarter. Moron.
Theresa giving to terrorist organizations is illegal in my book. A quick search of any news sources will highlight these blnuders[sic].
Here's a solid debunking of your idiotic claim.
No links. These are just numbers. Balderdash. Poppycock. Lies.
You provide no links because you are lying and no reputable links support your lies.
Your 45 mpg is your feel good excuse, no one cares what you do - it isn't fixing the problem.
Yes, it is fixing the problem. It's reducing world demand for oil.
Bush and Kerry saw the same intelligence. Kerry authorized force.
Kerry authorized Bush to use force in the hopes that Bush would be smart enough to use it to pressure Saddam.
His own medals. His own betrayal of America, his own voting record.
Kerry earned medals in Vietnam. Bush had daddy pull strings to keep him out of 'Nam, went AWOL from the Air National Guard, got busted for DUI, and snorted crack cocaine. And he's your boy!
No, the UN is perfectly happy doing nothing. People like you kick and scream like fucking pussies every time someone goes to free oppressed people an/or get resourced for the economy you leech off of.
Nice try at ducking the point, but Bush/Cheney are letting genocide occur in Darfur because there is no oil there. You may support attacking sovereign nations to steal their natural resources, but I do not.
Doesn't fix the root power problem. Foolish ignoramus response. You would fuck the working class you claim to love the MOST with this ridiculous elitist bullshit philosophy. How they supposed to get to work, Daddy Warbux?
By purchasing fuel-efficient cars, moron. That reduces demand, which results in lower oil prices.
Let's get one thing straight, you are the liar and the fact twisting sicko here, not me.
Nice try, but I caught you in yet another lie.
If it was economical, it would be competing already.
So why is Bush spending our tax money on hydrogen fueled cars? If they were economical, they would be competing already. People don't tend to buy cars that use biodiesel if biodiesel isn't readily available. Fuel station owners aren't going to sell biodiesel if there isn't much demand. That's why tax incentives can get the ball rolling -- much as Bush claims to be doing with hydrogen-fueled vehicles.
I wrote:{lies
Oct. 31 (Bloomberg) - U.S. employers probably added 175,000 workers to payrolls in October, the most in five months,
That's not even enough to keep up with immigration to the U.S. Nice try.
"according to a report from Tim Kane and Rea Hederman, analysts at the Heritage Foundation,
The Heritage Foundation's "mission" from their own web site:
Founded in 1973, The Heritage Foundation is a research and educational institute - a think tank - whose mission is to formulate and promote conservative public policies based on the principles of free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national defense.
In other words, a bunch of right-wing assholes with a goal of promoting the Republican agenda.
Good job Sherlock, you uttered on of the most common English names ever.
Okay, then how about John C. Randolph (jcr@_INSERTED_TO_PREVENT_SPAM_idiom.com -- because, unlike you, I am not a dick). Sound a bit closer?
Open. Failed. Closed. Simple. To the point.
It's not failed if it made money, which it did. I could have kept it open had I chosen to aggressively pursue clients, but I had the business acumen to know that I was better off waiting out the tech sector bust in a W2 job and then reopening my consulting business.
OPEC doesn't have any effect on pricing. Yeah right. Your stupidity amazes me to no end.
You're the fucking idiot who first called OPEC a "nation" and then said that OPEC sells oil. It does not. It controls price and supply but does not sell anything.
You have supported people who oppose nuclear power. There is no question, this is by self admission.
You lied and said that *I* protested nuclear power. No, I never admitted anything of the kind, you liar.
None of which you can cite, none that cant be shown to show anything arbitrary by the survey taker.
The IEEE-USA analyzed BLS numbers and reported the following high-tech employment trends on July 26:
* The number of employed software engineers in the U.S. dropped from 856,000 in the first quarter of 2004 to 725,000 in the second quarter.
* The number of computer scientists and systems analysts dropped from 672,000 in the first quarter to 621,000 in the second. An average of 722,000 people were employed as computer scientists and systems analysts during 2003.
* The number of people working as computer programmers dropped from 591,000 in the first quarter to 575,000 in the second.
* The number of employed computer hardware engineers dropped from 86,000 to 83,000 from the first quarter to the second.
Kerry and Heinz stretched the legality of their deductions.
If they are illegal, prove it or STFU
The only charities he has given to is to Vietnam's communist party and through Theresa, several organizations linked to terrorism.
You lie and fabricate. Show any evidence for your statement, liar. In his 2003 federal return, Kerry reported charitable donations of $43,735 on a total income of $395,338. In 2002, Kerry made charitable contributions of $18,600 on a total income of $144,091. In 2001, Kerry gave $22,370 to charity on a total income of $137,499. In 2000, he gave $19,221 on a total income of $137,012. And in 1999, he contributed $21,955 to charity on a total income of $140,928. That's a lot better than the donations you have made to Israeli terrorist organizations.
Flawed thinking. Saddam was ineffectively punished by the UN and the oil flow was down and there is a resource war going on because of people like you who consume.
My VW Golf diesel gets 45mpg. What does your car get? As to your claim, why did oil prices skyrocket since our war on Iraq if it was just normal global demand for oil?
But Saddam would still be in power, and murdering people.
So you think it's fine for a President to lie in order to get support for wars that he wants to wage? Since you are someone who blatantly lies for personal gain, I'm not surprised that you'd take that view.
The UN is watching people get murdered in Darfur, they do nothing to stop murderers.
You'll notice that Darfur has no significant quantities of oil, so Bush and Cheney are perfectly happy ignoring the genocide there.
You create a demand for that resource.
As do you. And I'm willing to pay for it. If it goes to $8/gallon, I'll pay for that oil and won't recommend sucking our reserves dry while oil is still available on the world market.
You are a hypocrite to say you do not demand these products,
That was just another of your lies since I never said anything of t
Anyone got pictures?
Here we have a story about a brilliant young woman and and the first thing you do is ask for pictures of her? Maybe asking for pictures of her is your first instinct, but it is not mine. Mine was to do a Google image search...
Failures in business don't qualify for honorary degrees. Sorry.
I never failed in business. I opened a consulting business, raked in money for quite a few years, and closed the business down when I took W2 employment. I do not need the dick stroking of an honorary degree to validate my life.
Never worked at Apple in my life.
Sure John, whatever you say. Enjoy your little fantasy life and your imaginary company.
Not its a consortium of oil producing nations. You might want to find out the member states, you obviously don't know.
You were the one who said "Oil is commodity sold by OPEN[sic] and other nations." You didn't say "Oil is sold the the members of OPEC and other nations." And, by the way, OPEC doesn't sell oil.
The people you support protest nuclear power.
So first you lie and say that I protested nuclear power when I did not. Then when confronted, you claim that people I support protest nuclear power. Kerry's Web site states that "nuclear power can play an essential role in providing affordable energy while reducing the risk of climate change." His aides also say he is for nuclear power.
I know of no people with high tech expertise out of a job right now.
That says a lot about how few people are willing to deal with someone like you since tech sector unemployment is higher now than it has been in decades according to reputable statistics and analysts.
So it's okay to tax the rich more because they can afford it while your poster boy, Kerry, uses tax shelters?
Yes. Anyone, including you, is entitled to legally write off certain types of investments. If you put money into a 401K, that's a tax shelter and it's not "hiding" anything. John Kerry is for policies that will raise his taxes far more than yours. Unlike you, he's interested in the long-term good of the country, not just his own wallet. What's next? Criticizing him for writing off his charitable donations?
So we should just act like Neville Chamberlain and appear the Muslim terrorists, the new Hitler incarnate (who was a gun grabber like Kerry).
As the 9/11 panel stated in their report, Iraq had nothing to do with the terrorist attacks of 9/11. Nor was Iraq linked to sponsoring Al-Qaeda. Face it: We attacked a sovereign nation, killing countless thousands of civillians, based on lies about "weapons of mass destruction." Now they hate us and that's doing more to fuel terrorism than anything else. In fact, there were more terrorist attacks last year than in any year in the past according to the government's own numbers.
We should have acted in concert with the U.N. and our allies. U.N. weapons inspections were taking place and our allies voted in favor of continuing those inspections. We should have let them run their course. Had we done that, we would have learned that there were no WMDs and could have avoided a war. But Bush wanted to attack and wasn't going to wait until his concocted reason for attacking was proven to be false.
There is an oil crisis looming and the US attempts to secure a huge oil field for long term strategy and you people bitch and whine.
It's just a giveaway to oil companies. Bush wants to hand over drilling rights in Alaska so that oil firms can sell the oil on the world market to the highest bidder. If China is willing to pay more, then the oil will go from Alaska to China. There's no guarantee that the oil will only be sold in the U.S. or that U.S. citizens will pay below-market rates for the oil extracted from those publically owned lands. The U.S. Geological Service says the amount of oil that could be recovered profitably in ANWR is roughly 3.2 billion barrels -- a six-month U.S. supply. Moreover, it would take 10 years for that oil to reach the pump, and even when production peaks in the year 2027, the refuge would produce less than 2 percent of the oil Americans are expected to use that year.
The GOP has a history of civil rights.
That's why the NAACP is so strongly in favor of the GOP, eh?
Kerry is a flip flopping liar that betrayed America in Vietnam,
Kerry was honored for his service in Vietnam while Bush was getting arrested for DUI. Bush had daddy pull strings to keep him from going to 'nam and then he went AWOL, never fulfilling his commitment to the Air National Guard. Something about mandatory drug testing seemed to make him nervous. Like you, he's a coward.
You do not possess an engineering degree. No accredited institution has awarded you a degree in engineering, nor have you passed any of the engineering tests to become a certified engineer nor to you belong to IEEE.
The best and brightest didn't need degrees when I got into the field. Just ask Wozniak or Gates. I dropped out of college to do software engineering on Near Infrared Spectrophotometers using state of the art development tools (in-circuit emulators, high-speed scopes, high-end compilers and assemblers, etc.).
People like me control people like you because we are your intellectual masters and your arguments here make that easy to see.
You are just another drone at Apple, one of hundreds, if not thousands, of coders. You'll always be that -- just a "bit player" if you will.
've never heard of the nation of "OPEN."
OPEC. Sorry you can't use context to figure out meanings. I always thought you were that dumb.
I always knew that you were so stupid that you thought that OPEC was a nation.
Lies. Liberals are the champions of resisting nuclear power. You protested it.
No, I never protested it. You are a liar.
The economy has grown.
In what sense of the word? Jobs? No. Wages? No.
Wealthy people already pay the bulk to the taxes. If you cut taxes across the board, the people who pay the most get the most back.
And they don't spend it. That's why across-the-board tax cuts don't work to stimulate an economy.
Your friends, and John Kerry's friends, the terrorists, did that. Not Bush.
Bush attacked Iraq, not Kerry. Bush bombed the pipelines, not Kerry. Bush provoked the terrorists, not Kerry.
They volunteered to subject themselves to the possibility of being called to arms. The armed forces may be doing something unpopular, but it wasn't illegal to use the reserves.
I didn't say that it was illegal. I said that it hurt businesses.
Simple Economics shows that retooling GM's plant that makes 30 million cars a year will cost a too much to make the resulting cars affordable.
Gee, then how did American car companies thrive after CAFE was enacted?
If you want affordable fuel efficient cars, you will have to let financial experts plan it out, not reckless failed businessmen like yourself
You don't even have a business. You're just a drone working at Apple and will never have your own business.
By the way, less than 25% of the petrol used is from vehicles on the road. The rest is burned by heavy industry, and consumers like yourself drive that demand. Too bad you cant blame that on Bush either.
I already did. Rather than pushing nuclear (or "nuc-u-lar" as you ignorant conservatives say), you right-wingers resisted efforts to impose tougher pollution limits on oil burning powerplants so that they could remain in operation.
The drugs are cheap in Canada because the Canadian taxpayer SUBSIDIZES the cheap drug.
You really are completely ignorant, aren't you? The drug prices are not subsidized. They are negotiated by the government as part of the socialized medicine there.
Anti Americanism is simply the King of the Hill effect. You cant make the RoW happy by licking their boots, you must beat them. We have the largest economy in the world, second to only former enemies of ours, Japan and Germany namely. If you think the US is destined for failure, put your money where your mouth is - remind yourself you failed at business - and sell America short.
My business made me hundreds of thousands of dollars and I shut it down voluntarily with no monetary losses when the economy turned sour for software consulting. I do invest heavily in overseas companies and they are helping my stock portfolio immensely right now.
Funny, I've never been a beneficiary of the SBA.
That's because you are jus
AIDS can and has spread from one person to another via ALL body fluids including tears.
The NIH and CDC disagree with you.
And I laugh as I got paid to harass you sitting on the computer unemployed.
Better luck next time, Johnny. I'm employed as I do this but I'm not so stupid as to use my employer's equipment and network to post messages. That's something that Apple's lawyers and/or HR people will explain to you in the near future (if they have not already). In fact, I'll probably get paid a whole lot more for your postings than you got paid to make them.
I laugh at you, pitiful "engineer" You lie, you never got an engineering degree. You call yourself something you are not and never will be.
So, is Steve Wozniak not an engineer either? You had to get a degree because you were not smart enough to write software without someone holding your hand and teaching you how. Like the guy who started your company, I had brains and talent, so I was hired away from college by a firm making Near Infrared Spectrophotometers.
So now you claim jurisprudence means that you can look in unrelated case law for contextual definition of words to effect your current case?
There was no "contextual definition" of anything. There was a recognition, by the court, of the concept of "limited infringement."
You wrote: "There is no degree of infringe. Either you are defined as infringing or not. There is no partial infringement or limited infringement."
In an earlier post, you wrote: "Now, I consider "shall not be infringed" to mean nothing else but what it says. Specifically, that means "without limitation".
I proved that the legal system recognizes that the word "infringe" is not a "boolean." I don't need to find a case about gun control to prove that. All I have to do is find any legal case in which the court recognizes the concept of partial or limited infringement. I did that. Now it's your job to find one which supports your position. Good luck.
Just a little liberal faggot
Nothing like a little right-wing bigotry and homophobia.
Watch the little twit flip out when Bush wins next Tuesday.
Bush will probably win because education levels are dropping. In Bush/Gore, Bush was the overwhelming favorite in the states with the lowest education level while Gore took those with the highest.
Prove AIDS cannot be spread that way.
Prove a negative? Prove that colon cancer can't be spread that way. Prove that sickle cell anemia can't be spread that way. Prove that diabetes can't be spread that way. Prove that Parkinson's can't be spread that way. You can't prove a negative and you can't lock up every person in the world who gets a disease.
As a group, Jews educate themselves.
You are proof-positive that not all Jews educate themselves. Your bigoted ignorance about HIV/AIDS, and other subjects, is proof of that -- as is your (at best) semi-literate writing.
We are killed most often by partials such as yourself.
I am your intellectual superior in every sense of the word. I am more intelligent than you are. I am more educated than you are. I am more logical than you are. That has been shown over and over.
And I am more honest than you are.
I know you, Kerry and other liberals and Trial Lawyers are into double speak and twisting the meanings of words to get your way,
What I quoted to you was a decision by a state Supreme Court, not something from a politician or "trial lawyer." That was a decision from the Justices of the court and it clearly shows that the concept of "limited infringement" is legally recognized. I had many other examples which I could have provided, but you won't consider them because they contradict what you want to believe.
From HIV Infection and AIDS, An Overview, NIAID Fact Sheet: NIAID, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892:Now, don't you feel like a total fucking idiot? You should.
Also, the Jews were called a menace by people like you, diseased or not. Being smarter causes that response.
So you're claiming that Jews are smarter -- sort of some kind of 'master race.' Interesting.