They're comparing theoretical performance of a 7nm chip with a 14nm one, while both consuming the same power yet performing not as well. So what they're really saying is they're getting 10% less performance per watt with much better, more efficient process.
Stolen cars are going to have the gps tracked plate ripped off, maybe chucked in the back of a random pickup to throw off authorities.
Where I'm from a car gets a plate when you first register it, when the registration runs out you pay for a renewal and keep the existing plate. They post a new label to put in the windscreen when you renew online.
As for vanity plates, it'll be cheaper for them to switch it but you can bet they'll charge you more for the "convenience" of OTA updates.
If Europe is for Europeans and Asia is for Asians, wouldn't America be for Native Americans, Canada for Inuit, etc? The white people should fuck off back to Europe?
150dB Sensation of being compressed as if underwater 152dB Vibration is painful and felt in joints 153dB Throat vibrating so hard it is impossible to swallow 154dB Compression will burst child’s balloon 155dB Experience cooling from excited air movement, up to 15 degree C perceived cooling 158dB Inside of a rock concert speaker bin with 5000 watts power
Most hard drives aren't sealed, they have a vent containing a filter. There are some helium filled drivers, but most, and all laptop drives are not sealed, there is no membrane to pop.
Posting ads in a printed newspaper blocks younger job seekers. Posting ads on a community notice board at the supermarket blocks online grocery shoppers seeking jobs.
You know Librem 5 doesn't actually exist now eh? You can pre-order a development kit.... By the time it gets produced (if it ever does) it's going to be a low to mid range phone performance wise, with an iMX8m cpu. They should have stuck with the iMX8. It's a basic 1.5GHz quad core A53 CPU, like mid range phones from 3 years ago - the Moto G from 2015 has a quad core 1.4GHz A53. The iMX8 on the other hand has another 2 A72 cores. It'll probably have shit battery life too, as the iMX series aren't designed for phones. Tablets would be the thing with the smallest battery they're designed for.
Kinda sounds like "You want to buy the shiniest newest device every year after throwing away your old one and you don't care about bootloaders. If you do, you're in the minority that won't affect sales."
That's the problem. It's not just driver support either, it's board support. The same components can be put together in different ways, requiring different configuration of the drivers for different devices. There's no standard "plug and play" system to auto-detect all the connected hardware for these systems either, you end up needing a custom device tree for every variation of every device, which specified which drivers to load, what memory addresses are required to access them, which GPIO pins control them, etc. It's like PC's were back in the ISA slot days, except they all had a standard BIOS to boot the computer to a usable state.
All the different SoC manufacturers have different boot processes too. Some of them are absolutely horrible like the Broadcom chips in the Raspberry Pi, where the main processor is the proprietary video core and the ARM CPU is just a co-processor.
Different devices with the same SoC might need different boot code too, as the storage could be on the eMMC port, MMC0, MMC1, USB, SATA, PCIe, etc. You can't just probe all of them, or you'll end up with someone booting malware from the SD card they inserted.
I think their claim is they do this without permission, by having their app preinstalled on phones and collecting data from people without Facebook accounts.
Seems like something that needs to go through the court to figure out who's liable, Uber or the driver. Most driving laws around the world would place the blame with the driver for not paying attention while driving.
It's probably going to depend on what Arizona set out when they allowed the testing on public roads in the first place.
Seems pretty straight forward to me. Uber disabled the factory emergency braking system. Understandable, if they have something better...
Uber's system detected the pedestrian 6 seconds before impact. Fine. It them determined, 1.3 seconds before impact the the pedestrian was going to get hit if it did nothing. Makes sense, the woman was walking across the road, not standing still in the middle of the lane.
The system did nothing because Uber had disabled that functionality, apparently due to too many false positives making their cars stop in the middle of traffic. They left it entirely up to the driver to make those emergency braking decisions, as well as telling them to look at an iPad attached to the centre console and not the road ahead.
The street was lit perfectly well. The video they released was of poor quality. Any person paying attention while driving would have seen them. Cellphone cameras would have seen them, proven by people driving the exact same road at night and posting it to youtube.
Uber released the footage as media damage control. I wouldn't be surprised if they deliberately reduce the dynamic range to make it look like it wasn't entirely their fault, which it is.
If I was driving my non-autonomous car and didn't pay attention to the road, would I be responsible for killing someone, despite not seeing them walk infront of my car? Yes, I would.
If my car had the capability to keep to a lane, maintain speed and stop at traffic lights, would I still be responsible? Yes, I would.
That's about the limit of the capabilities of the Uber car. I assuming it can stop at traffic lights...
The law of man says the person controlling that big hunk of high speed metal needs to make sure they do so safely, and defines a set of rules to make it explicitly clear what is regarded as safe. It says if you're negligent in your responsibility to driver safe and you kill someone, you go to jail.
Look both ways. Also don't run over pedestrians.
The driver was not a computer, the computer had no way to stop the car in an emergency. The person behind the wheel had that responsibility.
The driver is at fault, unless a law has been past in Arizona that says a driver in an autonomous car is not require to pay attention to the road while testing.
If Uber told the driver to monitor the system instead of the road, they're telling the driver to break the law. Just because your boss told you to break the law, doesn't get you off the hook.
They kind of said more than "it wasn't our system that failed", more along the lines of "our system would have applied the brakes 1 second before impact" Which is much better than plowing through the person at 30+mph. Despite the video footage being terrible and much worse than would have been seen by the OEM camera. At 30mph the XC90 can come to a complete stop in about 15m. Less than 1 second at that speed.
Intel Corp.’s Mobileye, which makes chips and sensors used in collision-avoidance systems and is a supplier to Aptiv, said Monday that it tested its own software after the crash by playing a video of the Uber incident on a television monitor. Mobileye said it was able to detect Herzberg one second before impact in its internal tests, despite the poor second-hand quality of the video relative to a direct connection to cameras equipped to the car.
So I a revenge porn posted would have to do would be to open the image in MS Paint and write "slut" or something across part of the image, which they'd do anyway to prevent Facebook from detecting it immediately as nudity.
Slashdot Mirror
They're comparing theoretical performance of a 7nm chip with a 14nm one, while both consuming the same power yet performing not as well.
So what they're really saying is they're getting 10% less performance per watt with much better, more efficient process.
Stolen cars are going to have the gps tracked plate ripped off, maybe chucked in the back of a random pickup to throw off authorities.
Where I'm from a car gets a plate when you first register it, when the registration runs out you pay for a renewal and keep the existing plate. They post a new label to put in the windscreen when you renew online.
As for vanity plates, it'll be cheaper for them to switch it but you can bet they'll charge you more for the "convenience" of OTA updates.
If Europe is for Europeans and Asia is for Asians, wouldn't America be for Native Americans, Canada for Inuit, etc? The white people should fuck off back to Europe?
154dB would in impressive
150dB Sensation of being compressed as if underwater
152dB Vibration is painful and felt in joints
153dB Throat vibrating so hard it is impossible to swallow
154dB Compression will burst child’s balloon
155dB Experience cooling from excited air movement, up to 15 degree C perceived cooling
158dB Inside of a rock concert speaker bin with 5000 watts power
http://www.decibelcar.com/menu...
Most hard drives aren't sealed, they have a vent containing a filter.
There are some helium filled drivers, but most, and all laptop drives are not sealed, there is no membrane to pop.
Posting ads in a printed newspaper blocks younger job seekers.
Posting ads on a community notice board at the supermarket blocks online grocery shoppers seeking jobs.
etc...
https://www.google.com/search?...
Oh no, they lost a customer they never had.
It's already obsolete in terms of hardware capability and it's still in development with no end-date in sight.
It's a nice concept though.
You know Librem 5 doesn't actually exist now eh?
You can pre-order a development kit....
By the time it gets produced (if it ever does) it's going to be a low to mid range phone performance wise, with an iMX8m cpu. They should have stuck with the iMX8.
It's a basic 1.5GHz quad core A53 CPU, like mid range phones from 3 years ago - the Moto G from 2015 has a quad core 1.4GHz A53. The iMX8 on the other hand has another 2 A72 cores.
It'll probably have shit battery life too, as the iMX series aren't designed for phones. Tablets would be the thing with the smallest battery they're designed for.
Kinda sounds like "You want to buy the shiniest newest device every year after throwing away your old one and you don't care about bootloaders. If you do, you're in the minority that won't affect sales."
provided proper driver support
That's the problem.
It's not just driver support either, it's board support. The same components can be put together in different ways, requiring different configuration of the drivers for different devices.
There's no standard "plug and play" system to auto-detect all the connected hardware for these systems either, you end up needing a custom device tree for every variation of every device, which specified which drivers to load, what memory addresses are required to access them, which GPIO pins control them, etc.
It's like PC's were back in the ISA slot days, except they all had a standard BIOS to boot the computer to a usable state.
All the different SoC manufacturers have different boot processes too. Some of them are absolutely horrible like the Broadcom chips in the Raspberry Pi, where the main processor is the proprietary video core and the ARM CPU is just a co-processor.
Different devices with the same SoC might need different boot code too, as the storage could be on the eMMC port, MMC0, MMC1, USB, SATA, PCIe, etc.
You can't just probe all of them, or you'll end up with someone booting malware from the SD card they inserted.
Everyone is taught in high school that burning hydrocarbons produces carbon dioxide.
The oil and gas industry has never tried to imply it doesn't.
Without oil, we have no plastic. You can't make solar panels without oil either.
That link you posted is pretty much exactly the same as readObject and writeObject methods in Java serialisation
I think their claim is they do this without permission, by having their app preinstalled on phones and collecting data from people without Facebook accounts.
Seems like something that needs to go through the court to figure out who's liable, Uber or the driver.
Most driving laws around the world would place the blame with the driver for not paying attention while driving.
It's probably going to depend on what Arizona set out when they allowed the testing on public roads in the first place.
It wasn't an engineering failure that caused the system to neither alert the driver or react to the situation.
Someone at Uber decided to disable the system because they couldn't get it right.
Nothing failed, it was turned off, so never had the chance to fail.
Seems pretty straight forward to me.
Uber disabled the factory emergency braking system. Understandable, if they have something better...
Uber's system detected the pedestrian 6 seconds before impact. Fine.
It them determined, 1.3 seconds before impact the the pedestrian was going to get hit if it did nothing. Makes sense, the woman was walking across the road, not standing still in the middle of the lane.
The system did nothing because Uber had disabled that functionality, apparently due to too many false positives making their cars stop in the middle of traffic.
They left it entirely up to the driver to make those emergency braking decisions, as well as telling them to look at an iPad attached to the centre console and not the road ahead.
The street was lit perfectly well. The video they released was of poor quality.
Any person paying attention while driving would have seen them.
Cellphone cameras would have seen them, proven by people driving the exact same road at night and posting it to youtube.
Uber released the footage as media damage control. I wouldn't be surprised if they deliberately reduce the dynamic range to make it look like it wasn't entirely their fault, which it is.
If I was driving my non-autonomous car and didn't pay attention to the road, would I be responsible for killing someone, despite not seeing them walk infront of my car?
Yes, I would.
If my car had the capability to keep to a lane, maintain speed and stop at traffic lights, would I still be responsible?
Yes, I would.
That's about the limit of the capabilities of the Uber car. I assuming it can stop at traffic lights...
The law of man says the person controlling that big hunk of high speed metal needs to make sure they do so safely, and defines a set of rules to make it explicitly clear what is regarded as safe.
It says if you're negligent in your responsibility to driver safe and you kill someone, you go to jail.
Look both ways. Also don't run over pedestrians.
The driver was not a computer, the computer had no way to stop the car in an emergency. The person behind the wheel had that responsibility.
The driver is at fault, unless a law has been past in Arizona that says a driver in an autonomous car is not require to pay attention to the road while testing.
If Uber told the driver to monitor the system instead of the road, they're telling the driver to break the law.
Just because your boss told you to break the law, doesn't get you off the hook.
Samsung do a 9.7" tablet with an OLED display
They kind of said more than "it wasn't our system that failed", more along the lines of "our system would have applied the brakes 1 second before impact"
Which is much better than plowing through the person at 30+mph. Despite the video footage being terrible and much worse than would have been seen by the OEM camera.
At 30mph the XC90 can come to a complete stop in about 15m. Less than 1 second at that speed.
Intel Corp.’s Mobileye, which makes chips and sensors used in collision-avoidance systems and is a supplier to Aptiv, said Monday that it tested its own software after the crash by playing a video of the Uber incident on a television monitor. Mobileye said it was able to detect Herzberg one second before impact in its internal tests, despite the poor second-hand quality of the video relative to a direct connection to cameras equipped to the car.
So I a revenge porn posted would have to do would be to open the image in MS Paint and write "slut" or something across part of the image, which they'd do anyway to prevent Facebook from detecting it immediately as nudity.