It's more likely "professionally" installed systems that are the problem. Most physical security companies have no freaking idea what they're doing on a network, even 10+ years after IP cameras were introduced. I should know, I clean up after them all the time at my own physical security company. Add that to all the problems that "Hackvision" (Hikvision) has had, and it's a recipe for disaster.
Minor correction: the card would very likely not be a Wiegand card, as that's an old swipe technology. (The dude loved naming things after himself.) It'd more than likely be prox in the USA, since our adoption of smart cards is a decade behind the rest of the world.
This was done several years ago by another: see here.
The issue is that, even if you have the most secure, multi-factor biometric and smart card reader, it's still more than likely transmitting that data back to the access control panel via Wiegand, which is offers not even the slightest bit of security against interception, replay, etc. OSDP has been around for a while and offers encryption to at least combat this, but, honestly, nobody freaking cares, and the lack of industry adoption of OSDP reflects this. There's a dozen and a half easier ways to get into a building.
All of the camera manufacturers you listed, assuming you bought their cameras in the last 5 years, will support an H.264 video feed over RTP/RTSP. Here's a list of a whole lot of CCTV camera RTSP URLs. If one you have isn't listed, it shouldn't be too hard to find it elsewhere on the web.
Hikvision and Dahua are the two big cheap Chinese names for CCTV. For the VMS, Milestone offers a free version of XProtect with a severely-limited feature set.
I'm assuming that this is just a few cameras for a home or small office, though. If it's anything more than that you really should have it done professionally. There's a lot of ways to improperly install a CCTV system.
This would be a very valid rant if the reporting here were correct. The car wasn't trying to park--it wasn't controlling itself. From T 2nd FA: "It seems they are trying to demonstrate pedestrian detection and auto-braking", which is what he didn't pay for. Even that feature is overridden if you keep pressing down on the gas. This is entirely driver error.
It might have to do with the fact that most people are confident enough in their ability to not hit pedestrians that they don't want to pay extra for the camera and radar.
One of the nice things about Python is the very concrete idea of what is and isn't "Pythonic". I've never had too much difficulty jumping right in to something written in Python and having a good idea of what's going on.
If you're suggesting that people get their n3 from seeds, it is important to note that the conversion rate from ALA (in seeds) to EPA (then to DHA) in humans is absolutely awful.
Really? 'cause that sounds a hell of a lot more like the people in the anti-GamerGate camp than those in GamerGate
"OH NO THAT FEMALE GAME CHARACTER OFFENDS ME HELP HELP I'M BEING OPPRESSED!"
The attitude that women are worse than men means that men being more like women makes them an object of derision
Your bias towards women is showing, even if you don't consciously realize that you have it. Men acting like women or being accused of acting like women is a form of derision. Women acting like men or being accused of acting like men is a form of derision. Compassion is positive in women, and negative in men. Assertiveness is positive in men, and negative in women. There is no attitude that women are worse than men. There is no attitude that men are worse than women. There is an attitude of sticking to your gender role and striving to be the embodiment of it while shaming those more towards the middle than you are, or with more crossover than you.
Is it bad that that doesn't look all that confusing to me?
Though it seems like having two list comprehensions that are exactly the same save for the property of "x" that they access is inefficient.
Slashdot Mirror
It's more likely "professionally" installed systems that are the problem. Most physical security companies have no freaking idea what they're doing on a network, even 10+ years after IP cameras were introduced. I should know, I clean up after them all the time at my own physical security company. Add that to all the problems that "Hackvision" (Hikvision) has had, and it's a recipe for disaster.
Minor correction: the card would very likely not be a Wiegand card, as that's an old swipe technology. (The dude loved naming things after himself.) It'd more than likely be prox in the USA, since our adoption of smart cards is a decade behind the rest of the world.
Either I missed a tag or the PDF was filtered. Either way, just search for "Black Hat Gecko Wiegand".
This was done several years ago by another: see here.
The issue is that, even if you have the most secure, multi-factor biometric and smart card reader, it's still more than likely transmitting that data back to the access control panel via Wiegand, which is offers not even the slightest bit of security against interception, replay, etc. OSDP has been around for a while and offers encryption to at least combat this, but, honestly, nobody freaking cares, and the lack of industry adoption of OSDP reflects this. There's a dozen and a half easier ways to get into a building.
to see how completely fucking fed up with this kind of shit we are?
But that doesn't fit the "boo hoo sexism" narrative!
All of the camera manufacturers you listed, assuming you bought their cameras in the last 5 years, will support an H.264 video feed over RTP/RTSP. Here's a list of a whole lot of CCTV camera RTSP URLs. If one you have isn't listed, it shouldn't be too hard to find it elsewhere on the web.
Hikvision and Dahua are the two big cheap Chinese names for CCTV. For the VMS, Milestone offers a free version of XProtect with a severely-limited feature set.
I'm assuming that this is just a few cameras for a home or small office, though. If it's anything more than that you really should have it done professionally. There's a lot of ways to improperly install a CCTV system.
This would be a very valid rant if the reporting here were correct. The car wasn't trying to park--it wasn't controlling itself. From T 2nd FA: "It seems they are trying to demonstrate pedestrian detection and auto-braking", which is what he didn't pay for. Even that feature is overridden if you keep pressing down on the gas. This is entirely driver error.
From the Fusion story: "It seems they are trying to demonstrate pedestrian detection and auto-braking." So both the title and the content are wrong!
It might have to do with the fact that most people are confident enough in their ability to not hit pedestrians that they don't want to pay extra for the camera and radar.
One of the nice things about Python is the very concrete idea of what is and isn't "Pythonic". I've never had too much difficulty jumping right in to something written in Python and having a good idea of what's going on.
If you're suggesting that people get their n3 from seeds, it is important to note that the conversion rate from ALA (in seeds) to EPA (then to DHA) in humans is absolutely awful.
Can't tell if troll, or stupid.
No but it's about harassment because they say so[1].
[1] Source: Them
Really? 'cause that sounds a hell of a lot more like the people in the anti-GamerGate camp than those in GamerGate
"OH NO THAT FEMALE GAME CHARACTER OFFENDS ME HELP HELP I'M BEING OPPRESSED!"
more scorched-earth activity like doxxing and death threats against people who had the temerity to voice an opinion that someone didn't like
Oops, thought you were talking about anti-GG for a second.
I'll just leave this here: http://gamergateharassment.tumblr.com/
The attitude that women are worse than men means that men being more like women makes them an object of derision
Your bias towards women is showing, even if you don't consciously realize that you have it. Men acting like women or being accused of acting like women is a form of derision. Women acting like men or being accused of acting like men is a form of derision. Compassion is positive in women, and negative in men. Assertiveness is positive in men, and negative in women. There is no attitude that women are worse than men. There is no attitude that men are worse than women. There is an attitude of sticking to your gender role and striving to be the embodiment of it while shaming those more towards the middle than you are, or with more crossover than you.
Uh, infant mortality? Predators actually being an issue? Disease? Constant strife? No, go ahead and just ignore those.
Is it bad that that doesn't look all that confusing to me? Though it seems like having two list comprehensions that are exactly the same save for the property of "x" that they access is inefficient.
Question: Who gives a fuck?
Yeah, I pity anyone who runs RAID5 on such large disks. Enjoy your UREs.
You're confusing "gender" and "sex".
Except that RedCloud was just bought by Avigilon.
Why would you do this? I was hoping to actually have a productive day.