The money given to the bank, whether or not they are put into a new loan, becomes pure profit.
Usually banks earn a couple cents for every dollar deposited, now they earn the whole dollar.
Something like this could at least work in simple cases like sharing bandwidth over a network, where bids are often made by machines on behalf of people, and when most people are somewhat separated apart from what they get. Just like there are many different views on what's fair or not, there is also an abundance of problems and what's needed to solve.
As subtle as it might seem, in many cases good university-level teaching also relies on the constant intake of information via a continued effort on research. Stuff could get old really quickly these days. Professors have to learn before they teach, and it is the thorough, rigorous investigation in some topic that gives them sufficient insight to keep their authority. If it's not done by themselves, it was already done by others. It is especially true for courses that deal with cutting-edge technology, or when courses have to be designed to educate students to meet new academic or industrial demands.
At somewhere I worked previously, a mathematician was refused professorship. Some people on the committee were chosen from the design school and the business school, and they unanimously blamed the mathematician for his low cumulative impact factor, comparing him to themselves, which was actually a significant cause of his rejection. All evaluation was based on metrics and simple rules such as "number of papers in a top X journal in the past Y years". Just like the case with frat traditions, people who survive this stupid system feel justified to stick to it. It was not long ago that the department of mathematics was at the edge of collapse
Do you know of the basic responsibilities of a university professor? Ever heard of the word "research"? Looked in a dictionary about it? I'm sure the first search page at Google would give you plenty of answers. How could you be so condescending when you say you don't know something and apparently haven't used the search engine? If I'm missing something, please explain it to me.
It also makes good sense to to negotiate and explain, even with a massive concerted effort. The scenario isn't take-it-or-die; a businessman that doesn't negotiate can't live long, and we want to use that fact.
DoCoMo would be stupid to just sit there and yell, but it's never wrong to ask Google to take some burden, especially as they make money from each other.
Nodding on the first day in court kinda kills chances to go public, and the judge could hand you a fair, if not more generous, sentence because you were quick. If publicity is a goal, there are lots of means, which includes giving a fierce fight and helping journalists effectively.
The "porn" comments can be considered rude and vulgar, but they only appeal to the prevalent demand for female pornography actors, rather than being intrinsically sexual. If male pornography actors were more marketable, the same thing would happen to a stay-at-home dad, and people might even talk about gay porn.
Moreover, I believe the first post was first mostly because it was short, and indeed many people follow the headlines closely.
You also made two sweeping generalizations, before and after you saw the first post.
Experts on any field are a minority; they aren't that strong when it comes to lobbying. It's probably better to ask for transparency in the lobbying process.
TFA trivializes the result. A reduction of up to 90% the speed is not theoretically interesting at all - it could always be overridden by difference in architecture and implementation, often making older algorithms faster. There are many better ways to describe the reduction in time complexity to the laymen.
Twitter isn't a big deal, Facebook is probably only marginally more important, but shutting down Google would generate all kinds of losses pretty much everywhere...
The generic household Chinese dictionary would not have nearly as much as 50000 characters, and most people do not know more much than 5000. Some characters are also more popular than others. Parents won't usually use "death" and "sickness"; instead they would prefer "affluence" and "happiness". The actual pool of characters for naming is not that large.
Slashdot Mirror
The money given to the bank, whether or not they are put into a new loan, becomes pure profit. Usually banks earn a couple cents for every dollar deposited, now they earn the whole dollar.
Does everyone use randomized quick sort?
But I see no action. Please, please, send more women to my office.
He means a tendency to assume, without consulting evidence, malicious intent rather than good faith.
You can be blamed for not locking your home, but the thief still goes to jail.
But they don't then combine all the degrees and ditch "pure" CS, which was the point.
*what needs to be solved
Something like this could at least work in simple cases like sharing bandwidth over a network, where bids are often made by machines on behalf of people, and when most people are somewhat separated apart from what they get. Just like there are many different views on what's fair or not, there is also an abundance of problems and what's needed to solve.
You save $15 and the industry loses $60.
Very well. Here is your Licence to Sue, jointly certified by MAFIAA.
No. It's more like turning off the radar and shutting down artillery at a front-line base.
So we're going to see this every four years? Except every hundred years? Except every four hundred years?
As subtle as it might seem, in many cases good university-level teaching also relies on the constant intake of information via a continued effort on research. Stuff could get old really quickly these days. Professors have to learn before they teach, and it is the thorough, rigorous investigation in some topic that gives them sufficient insight to keep their authority. If it's not done by themselves, it was already done by others. It is especially true for courses that deal with cutting-edge technology, or when courses have to be designed to educate students to meet new academic or industrial demands.
At somewhere I worked previously, a mathematician was refused professorship. Some people on the committee were chosen from the design school and the business school, and they unanimously blamed the mathematician for his low cumulative impact factor, comparing him to themselves, which was actually a significant cause of his rejection. All evaluation was based on metrics and simple rules such as "number of papers in a top X journal in the past Y years". Just like the case with frat traditions, people who survive this stupid system feel justified to stick to it. It was not long ago that the department of mathematics was at the edge of collapse
Do you know of the basic responsibilities of a university professor? Ever heard of the word "research"? Looked in a dictionary about it? I'm sure the first search page at Google would give you plenty of answers. How could you be so condescending when you say you don't know something and apparently haven't used the search engine? If I'm missing something, please explain it to me.
It also makes good sense to to negotiate and explain, even with a massive concerted effort. The scenario isn't take-it-or-die; a businessman that doesn't negotiate can't live long, and we want to use that fact.
Whatever, his first speech is going to be delivered on 1st April.
DoCoMo would be stupid to just sit there and yell, but it's never wrong to ask Google to take some burden, especially as they make money from each other.
T____rists Home. Sounds fair to me.
Nodding on the first day in court kinda kills chances to go public, and the judge could hand you a fair, if not more generous, sentence because you were quick. If publicity is a goal, there are lots of means, which includes giving a fierce fight and helping journalists effectively.
The "porn" comments can be considered rude and vulgar, but they only appeal to the prevalent demand for female pornography actors, rather than being intrinsically sexual. If male pornography actors were more marketable, the same thing would happen to a stay-at-home dad, and people might even talk about gay porn. Moreover, I believe the first post was first mostly because it was short, and indeed many people follow the headlines closely. You also made two sweeping generalizations, before and after you saw the first post.
Experts on any field are a minority; they aren't that strong when it comes to lobbying. It's probably better to ask for transparency in the lobbying process.
Typo: A reduction of up to 90% the "time"...
TFA trivializes the result. A reduction of up to 90% the speed is not theoretically interesting at all - it could always be overridden by difference in architecture and implementation, often making older algorithms faster. There are many better ways to describe the reduction in time complexity to the laymen.
Twitter isn't a big deal, Facebook is probably only marginally more important, but shutting down Google would generate all kinds of losses pretty much everywhere...
The generic household Chinese dictionary would not have nearly as much as 50000 characters, and most people do not know more much than 5000. Some characters are also more popular than others. Parents won't usually use "death" and "sickness"; instead they would prefer "affluence" and "happiness". The actual pool of characters for naming is not that large.