No, just having 4 motors where one failure is catastrophic.
Not necessarily entirely catastrophic. If it has enough excess thrust it's theoretically possible for a drone to sustain controlled flight with three out of four props out of action.
I mean, it's not pretty, and if it's scaled up to passenger size it would probably kill the occupants anyway even if it didn't fling itself apart, but still...
Bristol-based software developer James Stanley, who used to work at Netcraft, shares how encrypted emails, something which was first introduced over 25 years ago,
Got enough commas in there?
is still difficult
Uh, what? Emails is still difficult?
but not only things like GPG, PGP, OpenPGP were -- for no reason -- confusing
"Not only were things like..." would've been easier to parse, though this is borderline cromulent.
Enigmail continues to suffer from a bug that takes forever in generating keys.
The bug takes forever "in generating" keys?
Look, if English isn't the submitter's first language, that's no big deal. But somebody, somewhere, should be responsible for editing submissions if you want people to actually think you're a professional news aggregator.
(More than 16 players can gather in the same virtual space.)
Wow. 16? Like, one-six? Surely no machine in the world can handle that kind of data throughput!
---
Alternative snarky comment: why more than 16? Is 17 the minimum, for some reason? If there is an actual hard limit, why not quote that number instead of 16? Why not say "more than 8" or "more than 24"?
Please try and write summaries that at least get somewhere close to the crux of the story, and don't just trail off mid-concept.
In 2003, Giulio Tononi and Chiara Cirelli, biologists at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, proposed that synapses grew so exuberantly during the day that our brain circuits got “noisy.” When we sleep, the scientists argued, our brains pare back the connections to lift the signal over the noise.
Or they just tweaked their definition of "corrupt" so the number was shockingly high, but not so high as to throw light on the arbitrary nature of said definition.
The only question you asked was a) rhetorical and b) logically fallacious, so yes, I did "sidestep" it. I don't remember agreeing to be the one to answer it, anyway, so I'm not sure you're getting snippy with me.
If you can't come up with a good reason for a change then the way we have done something in the past is in fact an excellent reason not to change something.
You really can't think of a good reason not to submit passwords in the clear? Or that a warning about same won't help to alert a user that he's on a spoofed page?
Slashdot Mirror
Getting rid of those annoying ads are the only reason I have it.
Maybe I'm not watching the right kind of videos, but if you use Firefox and uBlock... no ads. Ever.
But it wor! I tell you it wor!
Or you could use one of these.
I thought they already did that.
The IP block is presumably there now because people are just putting the IP addresses in to get around the DNS black hole.
No, just having 4 motors where one failure is catastrophic.
Not necessarily entirely catastrophic. If it has enough excess thrust it's theoretically possible for a drone to sustain controlled flight with three out of four props out of action.
I mean, it's not pretty, and if it's scaled up to passenger size it would probably kill the occupants anyway even if it didn't fling itself apart, but still...
Grieving father doesn't apply logic to reach a rational and objectice conclusion.
Bristol-based software developer James Stanley, who used to work at Netcraft, shares how encrypted emails, something which was first introduced over 25 years ago,
Got enough commas in there?
is still difficult
Uh, what? Emails is still difficult?
but not only things like GPG, PGP, OpenPGP were -- for no reason -- confusing
"Not only were things like..." would've been easier to parse, though this is borderline cromulent.
Enigmail continues to suffer from a bug that takes forever in generating keys.
The bug takes forever "in generating" keys?
Look, if English isn't the submitter's first language, that's no big deal. But somebody, somewhere, should be responsible for editing submissions if you want people to actually think you're a professional news aggregator.
Butt aliens?
Hah. Because it sounds like the word for butthole!
Always quote the dumb summaries so you don't look a maroon when they fix 'em.
The techniques used in this case have nothing to do with holography. It's a reflection of a flat projection.
There's nothing holographic about it. It's a reflection. The image is not 3D; it's flat.
Are Gates, Musk Being 'Too Aggressive' With AI Concerns?
Perhaps they could focus on stopping people from needlessly replacing the word "and" with a comma in headlines.
It's a pointless and archaic tradition, and copying it doesn't make Slashdot look any more legit.
(More than 16 players can gather in the same virtual space.)
Wow. 16? Like, one-six? Surely no machine in the world can handle that kind of data throughput!
---
Alternative snarky comment: why more than 16? Is 17 the minimum, for some reason? If there is an actual hard limit, why not quote that number instead of 16? Why not say "more than 8" or "more than 24"?
Someone who has truly mastered their craft may perfection 99% of the time.
May what perfection?
Please try and write summaries that at least get somewhere close to the crux of the story, and don't just trail off mid-concept.
In 2003, Giulio Tononi and Chiara Cirelli, biologists at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, proposed that synapses grew so exuberantly during the day that our brain circuits got “noisy.” When we sleep, the scientists argued, our brains pare back the connections to lift the signal over the noise.
To continue reading, become a free ALM digital reader.
Eh... no.
Are you allowed to copy/paste from a paywalled article? I guess we could ask ALM, they'd know.
Two athletes
Brother-and-sister video basketball players
They're video basketball players? That's not very athletic.
If you change "Theseus" to "farmer" and "ship" to "axe," is it still the same philosophical problem?
Or they just tweaked their definition of "corrupt" so the number was shockingly high, but not so high as to throw light on the arbitrary nature of said definition.
If echo was tied into Wikipedia (and with skills, it is) it would be used a lot more.
You can say "Alexa, Wikipedia (subject)" out of the box.
I noticed you sidestepped the question.
The only question you asked was a) rhetorical and b) logically fallacious, so yes, I did "sidestep" it. I don't remember agreeing to be the one to answer it, anyway, so I'm not sure you're getting snippy with me.
If you can't come up with a good reason for a change then the way we have done something in the past is in fact an excellent reason not to change something.
You really can't think of a good reason not to submit passwords in the clear? Or that a warning about same won't help to alert a user that he's on a spoofed page?
Who is Mozilla to assume that every damn website is important enough to require encryption?
They haven't. HTTPS-less are still going to work.
Slashdot didn't support HTTPS for a good 18 years and we all survived.
Yes, having done things one way in the past is an excellent reason for continuing to do them.
Top left, bottom right, middle bottom, bottom left, middle, middle-right? That's the combination to my ah screw it.
Can't say the same for Goo.. *CENSORSHIP* search engine.
Really? It finds TPB fine for me.
What? I don't know th- AAAARRRRGGGGHHHHHH