Why on earth would the Dept. of Justice peep when there are plenty of reasonable alternatives to the Apple ecosystem? What Apple is doing is entirely OK while there exists consumer choice.
A) Perhaps acknowledge the realities of the economy and take less money? I don't know how much you're talking about but 80% of what you made previously is still more than zero.
B) Computerworld just published statistics saying the IT unemployment rate is 3.8% nationally. Look elsewhere? Take a contract?
C) Four of the eight developers who work for me are in their mid to late 50s. I find your discrimination story difficult to process. I don't mind training technologies, but training process is a horrible experience. I like hiring you old fogies.:)
Mod parent up. At no point in history has technology ever solved the energy use problem, regardless of how efficient we become. The problem is that technology also has the unique characteristic of finding new ways to use more energy.
My wife is a good control for your contest. She has both a Mac and a PC and she is about as uninformed as it gets when it comes to security. Her Mac has no preventative utilities, and is virus and malware-free. Her PC has every matter of preventative security running at all times, and I am still cleaning viruses and malware off that bastard every single month. Granted the PC is running XP and not Windows 7, but still... this is an ongoing 2-year experiment, and her Mac is clean as a whistle. I have had to actually reinstall XP twice, her PC was so jacked up.
Patently false. Defense spending right now is the highest it has been since WW2 when adjusted for inflation, and WW2 should be the high watermark in our nation's history.
Defense spending is the third largest bucket in the federal budget. OK, that's not "most" of government spending, but it is highly significant. Our percentage of global defense spending has increased from 1/3 to 1/2 in recent years, mostly because of the decline of the USSR but with that in mind our budget should be adjusting accordingly--it's not. Instead, we choose to spend 6X the defense budget of China, which by all accounts is the only major threat to our existence. Meanwhile, they are yucking it up and killing us economically. Something has got to give.
Nope--there is nothing inherently bad about monopoly. There's nothing even illegal about being a monopoly. It is only illegal to leverage your monopoly with anti-competitive tactics, and you don't need anti-competitive tactics to become a monopoly. The two are mutually exclusive.
Disagree completely. I am 10 years removed from my computer science undergraduate degree and am halfway through my MBA program. The classes are at least half free discussion (albeit guided to a particular topic) and the professors, for the most part, are extremely motivated and care about educating as much as publishing--I have had several professors even say if you don't care about teaching, you should not be in this business. And comparing it to my high school experience 15 years ago is pretty much laughable--high school was a joke and I have never been more challenged in my entire life than I am right now.
Now, to be fair it is a top school, and if I contrast it with some of the programs that my friends are in their experience is practically night and day. So YMMV. But to slander the entire American University system seems fairly silly to me. It seems more like as with anything you get what you pay for, and you get back what you put in.
I agree. In fact, this looks very similar to the Amazon API which I think is fairly straight forward. People that don't understand how to use this will all migrate toward a UI anyway--someone will build one that serves basic file functions.
The hamster generates more bio-electricity than 120-volt battery and over 25,000 BTVs of body heat. Combined with a form of piezo-electricity, the humans have found all the energy they would ever need. There are stores...endless pet stores, were hamsters are no longer born. We are grown. For longest time, I wouldn't belive it...and then I saw the fields with my own eyes. Watch them liquefy the dead, so they could be fed intravenously to the living. And standing there, facing the pure horrifying precision, I came to realize the obviousness of the truth. What is The Matrix? Control. The Matrix is a computer generated dream world, built to keep us under control in order to change a hamster into THIS.
This is the worst post ever. Even according to the article itself the most likely percentage is 25? How does that qualify as "Won't Survive 2009?" Waste of time.
Google has really executed one thing successfully: search. You and I both know that Gmail is fantastic, but it's not "one with the masses" as another poster alludes to. I can't believe Android is going to be successful. Even if you take out their inability to execute on new products, they are way late to the party.
Anecdotal: I will never buy an iPhone as long as it is tied to AT&T. If they came out with a Verizon carrier option, I would be the first person in line.
They also lost some huge contracts to HP. It's kind of amusing to me that GM was doing its best to diversify its global service contracts across vendors, but are ending up, in the end, pretty close to what they had to begin with.
Slashdot Mirror
Your impression is laughably incorrect. But I don't fault you--I used to know everything about everything, too.
Why on earth would the Dept. of Justice peep when there are plenty of reasonable alternatives to the Apple ecosystem? What Apple is doing is entirely OK while there exists consumer choice.
A) Perhaps acknowledge the realities of the economy and take less money? I don't know how much you're talking about but 80% of what you made previously is still more than zero.
B) Computerworld just published statistics saying the IT unemployment rate is 3.8% nationally. Look elsewhere? Take a contract?
C) Four of the eight developers who work for me are in their mid to late 50s. I find your discrimination story difficult to process. I don't mind training technologies, but training process is a horrible experience. I like hiring you old fogies. :)
Mod parent up. At no point in history has technology ever solved the energy use problem, regardless of how efficient we become. The problem is that technology also has the unique characteristic of finding new ways to use more energy.
My wife is a good control for your contest. She has both a Mac and a PC and she is about as uninformed as it gets when it comes to security. Her Mac has no preventative utilities, and is virus and malware-free. Her PC has every matter of preventative security running at all times, and I am still cleaning viruses and malware off that bastard every single month. Granted the PC is running XP and not Windows 7, but still... this is an ongoing 2-year experiment, and her Mac is clean as a whistle. I have had to actually reinstall XP twice, her PC was so jacked up.
Can anyone afford Western-style pricing? Without my student discount I am fairly certain I would own no software.
Imagine a beowulf clust...
Patently false. Defense spending right now is the highest it has been since WW2 when adjusted for inflation, and WW2 should be the high watermark in our nation's history.
Defense spending is the third largest bucket in the federal budget. OK, that's not "most" of government spending, but it is highly significant. Our percentage of global defense spending has increased from 1/3 to 1/2 in recent years, mostly because of the decline of the USSR but with that in mind our budget should be adjusting accordingly--it's not. Instead, we choose to spend 6X the defense budget of China, which by all accounts is the only major threat to our existence. Meanwhile, they are yucking it up and killing us economically. Something has got to give.
Nope--there is nothing inherently bad about monopoly. There's nothing even illegal about being a monopoly. It is only illegal to leverage your monopoly with anti-competitive tactics, and you don't need anti-competitive tactics to become a monopoly. The two are mutually exclusive.
Disagree completely. I am 10 years removed from my computer science undergraduate degree and am halfway through my MBA program. The classes are at least half free discussion (albeit guided to a particular topic) and the professors, for the most part, are extremely motivated and care about educating as much as publishing--I have had several professors even say if you don't care about teaching, you should not be in this business. And comparing it to my high school experience 15 years ago is pretty much laughable--high school was a joke and I have never been more challenged in my entire life than I am right now.
Now, to be fair it is a top school, and if I contrast it with some of the programs that my friends are in their experience is practically night and day. So YMMV. But to slander the entire American University system seems fairly silly to me. It seems more like as with anything you get what you pay for, and you get back what you put in.
I agree. In fact, this looks very similar to the Amazon API which I think is fairly straight forward. People that don't understand how to use this will all migrate toward a UI anyway--someone will build one that serves basic file functions.
Duh, it's OS X. They've just never fired up that Terminal thingy. What IS that thing??
hahaha oh god I wish I had mod points!
The hamster generates more bio-electricity than 120-volt battery and over 25,000 BTVs of body heat. Combined with a form of piezo-electricity, the humans have found all the energy they would ever need. There are stores...endless pet stores, were hamsters are no longer born. We are grown. For longest time, I wouldn't belive it...and then I saw the fields with my own eyes. Watch them liquefy the dead, so they could be fed intravenously to the living. And standing there, facing the pure horrifying precision, I came to realize the obviousness of the truth. What is The Matrix? Control. The Matrix is a computer generated dream world, built to keep us under control in order to change a hamster into THIS.
This is the worst post ever. Even according to the article itself the most likely percentage is 25? How does that qualify as "Won't Survive 2009?" Waste of time.
Google has really executed one thing successfully: search. You and I both know that Gmail is fantastic, but it's not "one with the masses" as another poster alludes to. I can't believe Android is going to be successful. Even if you take out their inability to execute on new products, they are way late to the party.
You do the disappearing pencil trick, too?!
My impression is that these guys are are mainly surviving on corporate accounts.
Who pays for anti-virus anymore when there are plenty of great, free options for home use?
You are obviously forgetting about "Catholic High School Girls in Trouble."
[NSFW] http://www.metacafe.com/watch/165290/catholic_high_school_girls_in_trouble/
If there was a sexist programmer on the team, male party members would be receiving damage over time.
Anecdotal: I will never buy an iPhone as long as it is tied to AT&T. If they came out with a Verizon carrier option, I would be the first person in line.
I know I'm not alone.
They also lost some huge contracts to HP. It's kind of amusing to me that GM was doing its best to diversify its global service contracts across vendors, but are ending up, in the end, pretty close to what they had to begin with.
Good thing we're also too smart to get sucked into your silly religious war.
Or you could just keep your HD DVD player.