Slashdot Mirror


Google Employees Stage Protest Over Handling of Sexual Harassment (nytimes.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from The New York Times: Employees at Google offices around the world held a wave of walkouts on Thursday to protest the company's handling of sexual harassment. The walkouts, which started in Asia and spread across continents, were planned for around 11 a.m. in their time zones. Protests were held through the day in Google offices in the United States. The backlash was prompted by an article in The New York Times last week that revealed that Google had paid millions of dollars in exit packages to male executives accused of harassment, while staying silent about the transgressions. As late morning arrived in different time zones on Thursday, Google employees walked away from their work at offices including Singapore; Hyderabad, India; Berlin; Zurich; Dublin; London; New York; and its headquarters in Mountain View, California.

Employees posted photos on social media, but it was unclear how long the protests lasted as many of those who stopped working stayed inside the buildings. The employees who organized the walkout have called on Google to end its use of private arbitration in cases of alleged sexual assault and harassment. They have also demanded the publication of a transparency report on instances of sexual harassment, further disclosures of salaries and compensation, an employee representative on the company board and a chief diversity officer who could speak directly to the board.

271 comments

  1. But We're not EVIL by Tulsa_Time · · Score: 1

    Still not Evil... nothing to see here...

    --
    5 out of 6 people enjoy Russian Roulette & 6 out of 7 Dwarfs are not Happy
    1. Re:But We're not EVIL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Google should fire them all and hire competent people.

    2. Re: But We're not EVIL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No! Please keep the incompetent! Let them fuck up your panopticon and screw the pooch with your China plans!

    3. Re: But We're not EVIL by c6gunner · · Score: 2

      Fire them all and hire more commissa ... err ... "diversity officers".

    4. Re: But We're not EVIL by astrofurter · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No need. Big Brother Google already fired all their competent engineers. All that's left now are H1-Bs and screaming social just-us activists. I mean, seriously, have you seen the utter shit quality of Google's recent software?

    5. Re:But We're not EVIL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      heh he hoh hoh Brin and page have got to go ...

    6. Re: But We're not EVIL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No need. Big Brother Google already fired all their competent engineers. All that's left now are H1-Bs and screaming social just-us activists. I mean, seriously, have you seen the utter shit quality of Google's recent software?

      Yeah but H1-Bs tend to be "brown people" so they really help with diversity goals. That really accomplishes ... something.

    7. Re: But We're not EVIL by ghoul · · Score: 0

      The h1B ARE the competent folks.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    8. Re:But We're not EVIL by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      Because the definition of "competent" is to be totally okay with sexual harassment.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    9. Re: But We're not EVIL by cayenne8 · · Score: 2

      The h1B ARE the competent folks.

      If so, then that is one scary fucking statement.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    10. Re: But We're not EVIL by ghoul · · Score: 1, Interesting

      H1Bs have to have a degree in Comp Science or some other engineering+5 years coding and have to be paid a certain amount (differs by areas and cost of living. For Mountain View at least 105K).

      That sets some kind of a minimum bar as no company is going to pay 105K for incompetent folks.

      On the other hand if you are Black Lesbian you dont even need to interview. Google's diversity program calls that a triple play.

      When you get so hard into virtue signalling that you keep hiring useless people, you still need to hire some competent people to do the work and since you already blew your budget on useless hires ,you need cheap competent folks and thats where H1Bs come in.

      They are pretty much indentured labor and just keep their heads down and work hard till they win their freedom/get their greencards which in the case of Indians can be upto 20 years now.

      Any H1B getting paid 105K would be getting 200K if they were a citizen or GC.

      Indians are the new oppressed class. Funny how despite that when it comes to college admissions, Indians dont get any benefit for affirmative action.

      Side note: IT work is work that Americans will not do. It needs a certain level of intelligence and education but also has horrible work life balance. If you are willing to accept that shitty work life balance and are smart enough to get an Engineering degree there are much more high paying professions like Doctors, Startup Founders etc so basically only those folks who need a visa and hence need to work at an IT firm are the ones who take these jobs up. Everyone with a choice will go for the better options.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    11. Re: But We're not EVIL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If so, then that is one scary fucking statement.

      Why? Because it would mean despite Trump's frenetically hysterical xenophobic accusations against immigrants as he pursues his rampant fear mongering, corporations actually think that hiring competent employees is more important than mindlessly employing uneducated and ignorant Americans just to make up a quota?

    12. Re: But We're not EVIL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually no. What it means is that said employee would understan that they are there to do a job, not waste company time with their political agenda. If I owned a company where this happend, every last one would have just had their last day.

      Do that shit on your own time.

    13. Re: But We're not EVIL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With that attitude, you will probably never own a company. And if by some stroke of luck you ever do, most intelligent people will not work for you.

    14. Re: But We're not EVIL by astrofurter · · Score: 1

      "IT work is work that Americans will not do."

      Bullshit. It may be work that richie rich private school Democrats won't do. But there are a LOT of Americans who don't have the money & connections to pursue those other, more lucrative options. Those Americans used to be - and to some extent still are - the backbone of the tech industry.

    15. Re: But We're not EVIL by ghoul · · Score: 1

      People who do not have the money to get a medical degree do not have the money to get an Engineering degree. And if you have the money why would you get an Engineering degree when medicine pays so much better?

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    16. Re: But We're not EVIL by ghoul · · Score: 1

      BTW I think you missed the point. I said IT work whereas you took it to the entire tech industry. IT is the on call admin, the installations, the bug fixes, the internal projects. I am not talking about startups where you have a chance of becoming a miionaire. Americans are perfectly willing to do that. But the grunt work is something only H1Bs are willing to do.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
  2. Dupe by Shaitan · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Bad enough we had to hear about this politicized nonsense the first time.

    1. Re:Dupe by _merlin · · Score: 1

      Previous story was that people were planning it. This one says they followed through. Not a dupe - they could've not made good on their threats, which also would've been a story.

  3. Walk out over this, but not Dragonfly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These people are reprehensible. #DontHireGooglers

    1. Re:Walk out over this, but not Dragonfly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Women, right?

  4. An ad company by AHuxley · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The workers worked so hard getting the best education.
    Loans. All the exams. That wealth someone paid for the best education.

    They found work at an .... ad company.
    Working for Communist China and helping de rank the internet...

    Start your own company with your own great ideas.
    Find a really great company that makes product and services you actually like working with.

    Thats what your education allows you to do.
    The freedom to find work all over the USA.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    1. Re:An ad company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They found work at an .... ad company.

      So what is it you define an "ad company" to be? Generally that means a company that produces advertisements and plans and runs advertising campaigns over a variety of mediums (including the internet) on behalf of companies. I wouldn't say Google fits anything close to that definition.

    2. Re:An ad company by HornWumpus · · Score: 4, Informative

      Nobody cares about your definition.

      Google makes money selling ads.

      Bill Hicks was right.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    3. Re:An ad company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're also a Free Software Company because they give software away for free.

    4. Re:An ad company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's exactly what google does, you moron.

    5. Re:An ad company by AHuxley · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Software and hardware that allows ads more time with users is still part of been an ad company AC.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    6. Re:An ad company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Giving stuff away for free doesn't earn them money. The ads make them money. Google is an ad company.

    7. Re:An ad company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The freedom to find work all over the USA.

      Better rape than Richmond!!

    8. Re:An ad company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't say Google fits anything close to that definition.

      Wrap it up guys, the thread ended here

    9. Re:An ad company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's exactly what google does, you moron.

      Im pretty sure ad companies supply ads to Google for display.

    10. Re:An ad company by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2, Insightful

      College loans that you spend half your life paying back are mostly an American thing. Most of these protestors are outside the USA, where education is much more affordable. The downside is that they have no student rec centers with saunas, climbing walls, and acai bowl bars.

    11. Re:An ad company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody cares about your definition.

    12. Re:An ad company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The may give away software but nothing they actually run their enterprise on. The OS and database technology are the most secured pieces of software on the planet. And anyone thinking their web farms run on Linux and they use some variant of their Big Table non-SQL database tech are wrong. And Google is a Marketing firm that uses advanced technology to generate the largest portion of their revenue stream. They have no corporate motto except for "Make as Much Money as Possible" before everyone figures out their biggest corporate asset is the user data collected from those using any of their services.
      And it seems today you can be accused of sexual harassment just by noticing there are two different sexes. And all it takes is "accusations" to proclaim someone guilty as accused. Might as well create separate male and female office areas.

    13. Re:An ad company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Garbage software to collect more info for their ads.

    14. Re:An ad company by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      As in Bill Hicks the fantastic comedian? ?

      What's the reference?

    15. Re:An ad company by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      If you work in marketing or advertising, kill yourself

      Bill Hicks.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    16. Re: An ad company by astrofurter · · Score: 1

      "an .... ad company"

      Google is a surveillance company. The ads are just a cover. They make the majority of their revenue from selling surveillance data to repressive governments.

    17. Re:An ad company by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      Ah-ha, that skit! Thanks!

      I *really* wish we could ban all ads. Getting rid of the visual pollution alone would make it worth it.

    18. Re:An ad company by thegarbz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They found work at an .... ad company.

      Yes they did, and it completely irrelevant. You see the type of primary work a company does is completely irrelevant to a desire to work for a company unless your overriding decision is affected by some moral opinion about said company.

      What actually matters to most people:
      - The type of work.
      - The type of development opportunities.
      - The long term investment in the type of work.
      - The type of prestige.
      - Getting paid what you're worth

      This is why the likes of AI / image recognition experts will line up to be paid money with lots of zeros on the end to work at an "ad company". It's why datacentre designers and hardware experts line up to be paid money with lots of zeros by an "ad company".

      Start your own company with your own great ideas.

      If it were easy then everyone would do it. But it's not. It's far easier to be paid for your expertise than to branch out into something that you have no experience in. The fact that you actually suggested this shows that you've never started your own company before.

      Find a really great company that makes product and services you actually like working with.

      They did. Most educated and capable people do not work very long for a company they aren't happy with.

      Thats what your education allows you to do.
      The freedom to find work all over the USA.

      Which begs the question, why is it that you are more upset that these people work at an "ad company" than the people themselves?

    19. Re:An ad company by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Re "The type of prestige"
      Ensuring users have to view ads? Stopping users from not viewing ads? Censorship for Communist China? Deranking search results?
      Ensuring any new encryption is ad ready?
      Development opportunities...
      Ads and censorship....

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    20. Re:An ad company by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      And I doubt that Google employees care about your definition. Google uses ad money to build interesting stuff that many people would love to work on. AI, self driving cars, wireless internet balloons, smartphones, computational photography, operating systems...

      Almost everyone working in any kind of tech/R&D environment will ultimately be getting paid by commercial interests like advertising or sales.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    21. Re: An ad company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some have tried but have had their funding yanked through pressure. This beast unfortunately has to be killed from the inside out. Theyre too big to compete with.

    22. Re:An ad company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So become a political activist then. Set up a lobbyist group. Banning all ads is certainly possible in a democracy. If you can get the majority to see things your way. So many people are tired of ads.

      More realistically, you might be able to ban the most annoying ads, while recognizing that sellers needs to have some way of advertising their merchandise. So many people depend on sales too.

      Personally, I don't mind the existence of product catalogs, or ads inside stores. A generic ban on tv ads and web-ads (outside webshops) would be great.

    23. Re:An ad company by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Which begs the question, why is it that you are more upset that these people work at an "ad company" than the people themselves?

      Stockholm syndrome.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    24. Re:An ad company by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Re "The type of prestige"

      To make that clear we're talking about personal gain. It's amazing what having a company name does on your resume, especially when said company has famously high standards for employing technical people.

    25. Re:An ad company by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      > Banning all ads is certainly possible in a democracy.

      I don't think that's realistic at this stage of human development. :-/

      > A generic ban on tv ads and web-ads (outside webshops) would be great.

      That indeed would be a noble goal to reach for but, sadly, human nature is still based on an archaic paradigm: There is never enough.

      Once free energy is (re)discovered, our POV will change and maybe then people will realize that ads are destructive long term.

    26. Re:An ad company by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      No, they don't - If Gmail was free I wouldn't have to agree to let Google snoop on and sell my data in order to use it.

      Conditions are the defintiion of not-free.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    27. Re:An ad company by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      'Half their lives' is _optimistic_ for the worst cases, but those people are _morons_.

      That's hardly the average.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    28. Re:An ad company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aren't newspapers and TV news organizations in the same business then?

  5. ex-Google employees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    im pretty sure that Google Internal Security just face-recognized all of those social media posts, put all those workers on a blacklist, and will have them banned from the tech industry.

    young people these days don't seem to understand how mega corporations work. they are not your friend, they are not your community, they are not a family, they have no values, and they have no empathy. they are big, sociopathic lumbering expressions of greed and brutality. if slavery were legal, every single one of them would buy slaves. if murder were legal, every single one of them would engage in murder.

    stop trying to change Google. Quit google, and go work for some company that is not a monstrous leviathan of cruelty.

    1. Re:ex-Google employees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      But they put nice colors on the walls and give meeting rooms cute names.

    2. Re: ex-Google employees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too late for them to just quit Google and work elsewhere. If you have Google on your resume in the past five years then you have a mark of sin on your head.

      I would not want to associate myself with anyone who felt okay about working to advance the goals of a company like Google.

    3. Re: ex-Google employees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I would not want to associate myself with anyone who felt okay about working to advance the goals of a company like Google.

      I doubt all those Linux kernel contributors are too worried about you not wanting to associate with them.

    4. Re:ex-Google employees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [...] young people these days don't seem to understand how mega corporations work. they are not your friend, they are not your community, they are not a family, they have no values, and they have no empathy. they are big, sociopathic lumbering expressions of greed and brutality. if slavery were legal, every single one of them would buy slaves. if murder were legal, every single one of them would engage in murder. [...]

      My previous employer had a basement that had been made into a dungeon.

    5. Re:ex-Google employees by Kiuas · · Score: 1

      stop trying to change Google. Quit google, and go work for some company that is not a monstrous leviathan of cruelty.

      So you're advocating for people with moral differences working for megacorporations to just quit and go elsewhere. Okay. How do you think that'll play out in the long term? If the problem is, as you put it, that these corporations are 'big, sociopathic lumbering expressions of greed and brutality', do you think that situation will be made better or worse if people simply stop trying to change them and move elsewhere?

      Corporations, by their very nature, are amoral. They're guided first and foremost by profit and profit alone. They will only act morally if they see moral behavior as something that will bring them more cash, or alternatively if they see their immoral behavior as something that hampers their profit. Now, at this point it's clear that these tech megacorporations like Google, Apple, Amazon and others will not be be going bankrupt because of lessening demand. I mean, you damn these corporations as sociopathic, yet it's very likely that within the past 24 hours you have used their products, or someone you've bought stuff from is using their products. I know I have. The demand is there and it's steady.

      So the consumers clearly do not care because they really can't. You can't drive a car without supporting gigantic oil companies, and you can't own or use a smartphone without supporting at least one of the tech giants. That being the case the only groups that are left that can affect their behavior are: the shareholders, the advertisers, the employees, or the state via laws and regulations. Now I think everyone agrees the shareholders are not going to do much because they are the company and as such are only interested in the money. Same for the most part goes for the advertisers; they have no interest in biting the hand that feeds them more customers and more money. That leaves us with the employees and the state as the groups that can potentially do something about the behavior. Now, I'm personally of the opinion that megacorporations should be under tighter regulations, because one needs only to look 10 years to the past to see how much damage gigantic corporations can do to the entire global economy (and let's not even go into the environmental side of things) when they're left on their own and can just operate purely on greed.

      However I'm well aware that in the american political landscape calling for more regulations is usually met with heavy scorn as it's deemed 'anti-capitalist' (because the ability to make as much profit as possible is a sacred value in most of the West). Hell, we just saw Trump essentially saying that he doesn't give a damn if you guys sell tons of weapons to a regime that murders journalists working for American news outlets. I mean, who cares about freedom of speech, or freedom in general? We've reached peak Ferengi, and war is indeed, good for business. So let the Saudis oppress their own people and keep turning Yemen into an ever growing pile of rubble and human misery, as long as they do it with American high-quality weapons it's all good - think of all the jobs and the money to be made there! Same goes for the environment: the guiding principle of Trump and the republicans as far as I can see from the outside is deregulation, deregulation, and more deregulation. Who cares if the planet burns, the important thing is there's a lot of money to be made in the meanwhile, and something as pesky as morals or the long-term survival of advanced civilizations on the planet must not be let to interfere with business.

      With the general attitude towards megacorporations among mainstream American politicians being taken straight from the playbook of Gordon Gekko, and many of these corporations being so universal right now that there's no effective way most consumers can avoid giving them money, the employees are in fact the only group that can effectively pressure many of these corporations because the empl

      --
      "It is the business of the future to be dangerous" -Alfred North Whitehead
    6. Re:ex-Google employees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This. Also, they and others like them have successfully dumbed down the definition of sexual harassment to the point where it's a meaningless term. In its actual, literal definition, it's still wrong and should not be tolerated. However, if this country has learned anything in the last couple of months it's that you can be a rapist without actually committing rape, accusation = guilt, and some people are to be believed unquestioningly on the basis of gender or other immutable characteristics.

      In other words, I no longer care what any of them say or think. They have made words meaningless, and so their words mean nothing. As if people who choose to work for the likes of Google are worth much to society to begin with.

    7. Re:ex-Google employees by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      im pretty sure that Google Internal Security just face-recognized all of those social media posts, put all those workers on a blacklist, and will have them banned from the tech industry.

      young people these days don't seem to understand how mega corporations work.

      I take it you're young then? It may surprise you that the employer employee relationship is something typically of benefit to both sides. Employers don't sit around looking for excuses to fire people. Google probably knows quite well who participated in the process, they will however do precisely nothing about it.

      Finding staff costs money.
      Training staff costs money.
      That doesn't even take into account the quality or capability of the staff in question.

      stop trying to change Google. Quit google, and go work for some company that is not a monstrous leviathan of cruelty.

      Or I could take the good (the reason I would work for a company), and then try to influence the bad to make my already good life even better. Why instead take a monstrous risk somewhere else, especially when it is quite likely in a larger group that I have the power to change the bad?

    8. Re:ex-Google employees by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      monstrous leviathan of cruelty

      Descriptions like that are so far divorced from reality that they undermine your argument.

      Google is unlikely to retaliate because it needs skilled workers, and has trouble recruiting them already. Blacklisting people is like salting the earth, you not only destroy your most important resource but ensure that it's extremely difficult to recover.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    9. Re: ex-Google employees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Tldr;

    10. Re:ex-Google employees by colonslash · · Score: 1

      > they are big, sociopathic lumbering expressions of greed and brutality.
      I'd say this is true when any group of people gets above 10 or so, once there are enough people that you need a system to keep the group running, so people can just blame the system. Good luck trying to run a planet with 7 billion people without having these problems.

      > young people these days don't seem to understand how mega corporations work.
      They do what's in their own best interest, to create money and power for their owners/executives/boards. If they lose business when they appear evil, it's in their best interest to not look evil. If their businesses do better with happy, productive employees, then they'll coddle the crap out of their employees.

    11. Re:ex-Google employees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bullshit

    12. Re:ex-Google employees by micahraleigh · · Score: 0

      Are you talking about corporations or government?

    13. Re:ex-Google employees by sexconker · · Score: 1

      If people had morals or spines, they'd leave in large numbers and Google, Facebook, etc. would crumble overnight.

    14. Re: ex-Google employees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My favorite is the Van Buren room.

      As a Van Buren gang member...I Approve.

  6. If the paragon of feminist morality by Jarwulf · · Score: 2

    cannot live up to their own standards, should we really be taking pointers on how to implement equality from them?

    1. Re:If the paragon of feminist morality by Comrade+Ogilvy · · Score: 1

      I would like to know when Google claimed they were a perfect company, rather than a company trying to do better, that has a ways to go in spite of their efforts so far.

      No doubt you can easily find a citation, right?

    2. Re:If the paragon of feminist morality by Jarwulf · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They didn't claim they were perfect. They just acted like it when lecturing us and trying to force us into their morality through lobbying and propaganda.

    3. Re:If the paragon of feminist morality by Mashiki · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I would like to know when Google claimed they were a perfect company, rather than a company trying to do better, that has a ways to go in spite of their efforts so far.

      In politics we call these people limousine liberals. The self-righteous, sanctimonious assholes that preach that they're better, their actions are better, and if you don't do what they tell you? You're a terrible person. This of course is while they're carrying on like normal or acting even worse then what they claim they're fighting for/against/etc.

      It's really no difference then the old catholic indulgence system. All sins can be forgiven as long as you virtue signal hard enough, and throw enough money at *insert special/pet cause* showing how "woke" you are.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    4. Re:If the paragon of feminist morality by Mashiki · · Score: 4, Insightful

      At this point I can tell if trolls like this are American or Ukranian....

      Would you be happier if I called them baizuo instead? By the way, it's a common term in Canada as well. Someone in the Ukraine would be more likely to use a local version of champagne socialist, noting the heavy communist influence on the country.

      Wish I could.

      Don't worry, one day you'll have learned enough of the world that it'll either drive you insane or make you a realist.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    5. Re:If the paragon of feminist morality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obvious incitement post detected tovarich.

      Have you done well enough to be paid, Comrade Commissar?

    6. Re:If the paragon of feminist morality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In politics we call these people limousine liberals. The self-righteous, sanctimonious assholes that preach that they're better, their actions are better, and if you don't do what they tell you? You're a terrible person.

      Funny. In the US we call them Evangelicals and Republicans. Sometimes we just use the catchall of "Christian" even though lots of denominations and churches aren't that bad but way too many are to trivially differentiate the ones that aren't "woke" to the spirit that drives their social crusade against just about everyone they don't personally like.

      Virtue signaling is what most church goers seem all about.

    7. Re: If the paragon of feminist morality by astrofurter · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yup. The corporate social just-us nazis at Google et al. remind me very much of the "fundamentalist Christians" who were prominent a couple decades ago.

      The same huffy self-righteousness. The same raging hypocrisy. The same burning desire to force their morality on an unwilling public. The same mean spirited, small minded, small hearted outlook on life.

      The social just-us nazis do seem rather better financed than the fundie fake-Christians were. (I guess suitcase full of cash from the Chinese intelligence services can come in handy.) But they are just as tiny a fraction of the population. And just as intensely unpopular with the average Joe.

    8. Re:If the paragon of feminist morality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So Ted Nugent is a limo liberal? How about Paul Ryan? Donald Trump?

      Let me ask you something, what is it like living with shit for brains?

    9. Re:If the paragon of feminist morality by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      So Ted Nugent is a limo liberal? How about Paul Ryan? Donald Trump?

      Hillary Clinton? Maxine Waters? Nancy Pelosi, Al Gore? Figure out the difference yet?

      Let me ask you something, what is it like living with shit for brains?

      I wouldn't know, but going by your post you seem to be a subject matter expert on this topic.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    10. Re: If the paragon of feminist morality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      George Soros is Chinese?

    11. Re:If the paragon of feminist morality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could ignore the nationality and address the argument. But you'd have to have an actual meaningful response first so....

    12. Re: If the paragon of feminist morality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The indulgence system required payment as extension on atonement. The protestants came up with the all sins are forgiven as long as you pretend mentality to separate the worldly from the religious.

      Under the indulgence system Google would be financially bacrupt (and rome would have a new cathedral made out of gold). As it stands they are only morally so.

    13. Re: If the paragon of feminist morality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      did you read TFA? You think giving golden parachutes to sexual assaulters and sheltering them from criminal prosecution is the correct way to conduct business?

    14. Re: If the paragon of feminist morality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "huffy self-righteousness"

    15. Re:If the paragon of feminist morality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry, one day you'll have learned enough of the world that it'll either drive you insane or make you a realist.

      found a typo, it should read ...
      "drive you insane or make you a racist"

    16. Re:If the paragon of feminist morality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same same.

    17. Re:If the paragon of feminist morality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes those serial killers are trying to do better. I guess this is why libshits murder babies and let the killers go free.

      Too bad they didn't get to you sooner.

    18. Re:If the paragon of feminist morality by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, one day you'll have learned enough of the world that it'll either drive you insane or make you a realist.

      In my case, both.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    19. Re:If the paragon of feminist morality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We say champagne socialist in Canada too. And no, we don't think we're better, nor are we all the same to be painted with such an obviously biased brush.

      A group can advocate for a certain approach to a problem without being 100% perfect in that regard - statistics are a bitch. I bet Google has employees that abuse their wives to some degree - statistics give it a pretty good chance. That doesn't make the company wrong to advocate against it, especially if their approach shows improvement over the status quo (and no, I don't know if google has better sexual harassment stats than the average).

    20. Re: If the paragon of feminist morality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no difference.

    21. Re: If the paragon of feminist morality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The man had consensual sex. Jesus Christ you people are all a Lynch mob.

      I hope your boss fires you for having sex with your hand.

    22. Re: If the paragon of feminist morality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rosie isn't anywhere on the org chart.

  7. What would you do? by Snotnose · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Half of your co-workers are walking out. You either think they're wrong, or flat out don't care and would rather keep working. If you keep working you're The Enemy in a highly SJW work environment.

    wat do? Work, or fuckit take a break?

    1. Re:What would you do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Show the company why men earn more: Get work done even when others don't.

    2. Re:What would you do? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Start a new company.
      Find quality work with another company.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    3. Re: What would you do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Complain to HR that you are being made to feel bullied by not participating in their walkout and you no longer feel safe at work.

    4. Re:What would you do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      ...but it was unclear how long the protests lasted as many of those who stopped working stayed inside the buildings.

      I guessing most just took an extra 5 minutes for their break to count as their "walkout".

    5. Re:What would you do? by iggymanz · · Score: 2, Funny

      yeah, plus walkouts are a great opportunity for some grab-ass since their not on the premises and not working

    6. Re:What would you do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you go to the gym for your regular morning gym time, I suppose? That's what I would do.
      Then maybe coffee and lunch. I hear they have both vanilla and strawberry ice cream today.

    7. Re:What would you do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd keep working and stay out of the way when my manager fires some ass.

    8. Re:What would you do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only one at risk of getting fired in this scenario is you, for suspicion of wrongthink due to lack of enthusiastic proclamation of anti-*ist beliefs.

    9. Re: What would you do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      You can't be bullied by a SJW. If a SJW bullies you, then you, by definition, deserve it. So it's not bullying. You're just bullying them more than you already do, by making them bully you.

    10. Re:What would you do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For certain, we learned that google employees behave more like children in high school than responsible adults.

    11. Re: What would you do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1 insightful

    12. Re: What would you do? by liefer · · Score: 1

      Good luck with that strategy when the HD department consists of 95% sjws

    13. Re: What would you do? by liefer · · Score: 1

      HR*

    14. Re: What would you do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You will get fired by administration for NOT protesting the company administration.

    15. Re: What would you do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trying to look like a catch-22, but it is just one more problem that can be adequately solved by violence.

    16. Re:What would you do? by binkless · · Score: 1

      Tell them to save the world on their own time.

  8. Look at that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do they want the victims to be outed as well? What could go wrong? I mean, of course there won't be any repercussions for ratting out someone.

  9. Bet they didn't post to Google+ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Posting to "social media" such as G+ would be a bad idea and probably career limiting.

    Whether I agree with they way Google hand hdnaled this is not the issue - "They have also demanded the publication of a transparency report on instances of sexual harassment, further disclosures of salaries and compensation, an employee representative on the company board and a chief diversity officer who could speak directly to the board."

    INAL, that in mind, I understand that Google are a private company so they don't actually have to do shit and disclose anything, and they can choose to handle this stuff privately. If Google have to disclose this information, then if there were payout to accusers, those too should be made public as well.

    And forget a CDO, what a waste of a title and job. We all know that diversity infers "not what and not a man" (an actual man I mean, a white woman transitioned to a man is ok).

    1. Re: Bet they didn't post to Google+ by c6gunner · · Score: 5, Funny

      Posting to "social media" such as G+ would be a bad idea and probably career limiting.

      Why would it be a problem if they posted to G+? It's not as if anyone would see it ...

    2. Re: Bet they didn't post to Google+ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Touche!

  10. Hire stupid SJWs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Get stupid work stoppages.

  11. Walkout by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And you are fired, or denied any promotions or raises.

    Good luck wage slaves.

  12. Tech version of union slowdown? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is that why gmail is fucking horribly slowly lately?

  13. Hire stupid harassers by DogDude · · Score: 0, Troll

    Hire stupid harassers, get work stoppages. Hire "SJW's and no harassers, get no work stoppages.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
    1. Re: Hire stupid harassers by c6gunner · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So I guess that means that, before all of these SJWs started creating work stoppages, there were no harrassers?

      Boy, the 1950s must have been wonderful. Totally harassment free!

    2. Re:Hire stupid harassers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Nah bro. There's always something to offend a feminist. The goalposts always change. When the entire culture is based on gaining power and prestige by taking offence, offence will be taken.

      They spend more time on facebook and slashdot compaining than working even when they do choose to show up. Don't hire them and you won't get your career ruined later when they witchhunt you for using the word "Dude" in your username or having a penis, or other not-woke-enough nonsense.

    3. Re: Hire stupid harassers by Mashiki · · Score: 5, Informative

      So I guess that means that, before all of these SJWs started creating work stoppages, there were no harrassers?

      No, they existed. The difference between now and 20 years ago is that the "amount to be offended by" has increased to the point where air conditioning, smiling, small talk, and refusing to be baited by the crazy cat lady is claimed as sexist.

      Boy, the 1950s must have been wonderful. Totally harassment free!

      Well it was, especially if you were working a trade. Just remember that working in a switch office was considered one of the worst jobs for women because of the high levels of backstabbing and mean-girl cliques.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    4. Re: Hire stupid harassers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look everybody! A SJN bully is screaming and ranting about his own moral virtue, and how everyone else deserves genocide. A pimply androgenous virgin who has never kissed a girl, lecturing adult men on how they ought relate to women.

      Look at this hypocritical nazi twat! What a fucking loser. An asshole, a coward, a pathological liar, and a fucking nazi.

    5. Re: Hire stupid harassers by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Looks like the NPC missed update 1.03a. Guess it's just further proof that machine learning has a long way to go.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    6. Re: Hire stupid harassers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Men are what built and manintain civilization.

      You won't get far running the world with only with people whose only skills include dyeing their hair blue and catching an uber to their UX/UI job while twittering away about their virtue signaling diversity conference.

      It won't even be men that lose if it comes to that. Other civilizations where patriarchy actually exists and is reinforced with violence will steamroll your "diversity" utopia where men who build things are not welcome. Same thing happened to every single community ran explicitly by women throughout history.

    7. Re: Hire stupid harassers by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 3

      These claims are modded up because many people have at least anecdotal evidence from their own environment that they are true. If you work for a large corporation, I’m sure you’ve had your course on “micro-aggressions”, which refers so called offensive behaviour that is so insignificant that you have to go out with a magnifying glass to look for it. Or just look at the wave of politically correct intolerance that washed over this year’s Halloween celebration.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    8. Re: Hire stupid harassers by c6gunner · · Score: 2

      That wasn't a wild claim at all. I may somewhat disagree with other parts of his comment, but the part you chose to quote is quite accurate.

    9. Re: Hire stupid harassers by Mashiki · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I love how here any such claims, no matter how wild, get modded up high. Now I expect to be modded down for pointing this out, despite it being true. If there's one thing the "anti SJW" can't stand it's dissent.

      Do you work for a company with more then 300 people, a Fortune company, or company listed on a major stock exchange that has annual profits greater than $15m/year? How about been to a university in Canada, US, or Europe in the last 15 years? Can you name the last time you had mandatory workshops on any of the following: Sexual harassment/workplace etiquette/triggers/trigger-words/micro-aggressions/politically (in)correct language/politically correct speech/politically correct terminology.

      Has your HR dept or student life/student union/professor published memo's outlining speech guidelines, improper speech, improper word usage in essays/papers, warnings against particular types of speech in the university and/or aggressively made restricted speech in a public university which is backed by the university president and/or dean of students. Thinking on the university, can you or can you or not remember at any point in the last 4 years where a TA, professor or tenured professor has been unofficially or officially sanctioned by either other professors, or adjoining body, or open protests by students for wanting to show full arguments/open discussion/defense of speech/views protected by charter/constitutional law/students rights charter/employment act/student union protections on an issue.

      If the answer is no. Then you haven't interacted with mainstream education, or corporate culture in the last decade in any western country. In turn, you're ignorant of what's going on around you. If yes, then you're either accepting of these views or you're either not paying attention or are simply lowering your head so much to not make any waves, you've accepted the abnormal as normal.

      Feel free to read campusreform, Fire, or anything similar for universities. Go on and read up about the Title IX abuses and abuse of students with no due process for indictable offences/felonies. Feel free to read the employment manual and/or the up to 20 supplemental documents at a major company. Read The Guardian, Vox, Vice, The Root, Huffpo, and read the articles that led to those same policies you're now skimming over. Look at the universities that are primary hires at these major companies, then go take a look at the googlers and their statements. Notice anything yet?

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    10. Re: Hire stupid harassers by thegarbz · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The difference between now and 20 years ago is that the "amount to be offended by" has increased to the point where air conditioning, smiling, small talk, and refusing to be baited by the crazy cat lady is claimed as sexist.

      Sorry but that's just plain horseshit. There are definitely people out there with this opinion, however they typically don't last long and few people give them the time of day.

      On the flip side 99% of what you hear about is actual legitimate complaints that are only not tolerated now because people are sick of being harassed by arseholes. ... I say 99% because I assume you are a normal person who reads normal stuff and doesn't hang out on SJW blogs or go around fatshaming people on tumblr or whatever it is those idiots do. They do exist, those echochamers exist, however they are exceedingly rare in large companies which (as you can see here) typically swing in the opposite direction.

    11. Re: Hire stupid harassers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you name the last time you had mandatory workshops on any of the following: Sexual harassment/workplace etiquette/triggers/trigger-words/micro-aggressions/politically (in)correct language/politically correct speech/politically correct terminology.

      Surprisingly 0 times despite working for a US company with over 20,000 employees. Maybe being privately-owned has something to do with it but probably mostly that it's not deemed necessary unless some idiot goes and does something that causes a lawsuit.

    12. Re: Hire stupid harassers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol if you think sexual assault is the same as disagreements about air conditioning, I am glad I don't work in your office.

    13. Re: Hire stupid harassers by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Do you work for a company with more then 300 people, a Fortune company, or company listed on a major stock exchange that has annual profits greater than $15m/year?

      Yep.

      How about been to a university in Canada, US, or Europe in the last 15 years?

      Yep.

      And your original claim is still bullshit. I note that you're industriously moving the goalposts though.

      Can you name the last time you had mandatory workshops on any of the following: Sexual harassment/workplace etiquette/triggers/trigger-words/micro-aggressions/politically (in)correct language/politically correct speech/politically correct terminology.

      I had one on harassment, none on the other topics you're angry about. I don't really see a problem with it because I'm not a massive snowflake who's so precious that I get triggered when someone tells me it's possible for me to behave in an unacceptable way.

      Notice anything yet?

      Yeah I noticed that you're perpetually aggrieved that you can't behave exactly how you want with zero consequences. I also noticed that your claims are so overblown as to be flat out wrong

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    14. Re: Hire stupid harassers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have been working at a European university the last 20 years, and seen none of what you talk about. No mandatory courses. No improper speech guidelines.

      When we quarrel with management, it is cubicles vs. offices. It is protests against hampering reorganizations. Who gets the better buildings. Or who gets to use the diminishing parking lots.

      I believe the problems you describe are real - but they aren't everywhere in the western world.

    15. Re:Hire stupid harassers by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Nah bro. There's always something to offend a feminist. The goalposts always change. When the entire culture is based on gaining power and prestige by taking offence, offence will be taken.

      They spend more time on facebook and slashdot compaining than working even when they do choose to show up. Don't hire them and you won't get your career ruined later when they witchhunt you for using the word "Dude" in your username or having a penis, or other not-woke-enough nonsense.

      The chilling proof of this statement can be seen by the fact that literally no men are now CEOs or Senators, judges, professors, doctors, etc.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    16. Re: Hire stupid harassers by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      I don't think that's quite right about the latter, but yeah, I'd assume a few companies skip it if they're not really seeing any reason to believe there could be a problem.

      Every company I've worked for in the last 20 years, big, small, medium, etc, has had some kind of sexual/racial harassment training session once a year. One did it online, others have staff meetings that are usually an hour long where a lawyer does a "fun" presentation. Interestingly with the sessions I was involved in for one of the companies I've worked for, the session usually ended with examples of lawsuits, where the employee who was upset about a fellow employee's harassment lost the lawsuit.

      It's kinda bizarre Mashiki thinks this is a problem, for those of us who aren't assholes we recognize the need for them and occasionally are given something to think about that's new, for those that are, well, you kinda need to be reminded to not be one, that's the entire point of them.

      Some people want businesses and work environments to be rotten horrible places where nobody feels comfortable except the biggest assholes. The rest of us...

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    17. Re: Hire stupid harassers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Men are what built and manintain civilization.

      Typical caveman bullshit. Who the fuck do you think cooked your meals, washed and mended your clothes, raised and fed your children ? Simpletons like you can only come up with simplistic views of reality. And only simpletons like you make it a question of "men vs women". Only in your sick, prehistoric little mind are "men who build things" not welcome. What's not welcome are dicks and jerks. Men "who build things" can also be civilized gentlemen, in fact most are. But I guess in your primitive little view of the world, in order to be "real men", men must be jerks, harras women and treat them as their own personal posessions. You should move to one of those war-torn ISIS-infested middle-eastern shitholes, you would feel right at home.

      Oh, and actually, what built and maintained civilization is slaves. I guess to you, that's justification for brigning back slavery, is it not ? Asshole.

      Now go ahead, downmod this post to -1, just like my OP was. I guess it's easier for people like you to suppress a reality they don't like than to have the courage to face it.

    18. Re: Hire stupid harassers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's the matter, little "adult man" snowflake ? Butthurt ?

    19. Re: Hire stupid harassers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nothing but ad hom and deflection. typical.

    20. Re:Hire stupid harassers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There it is. The fact that people with penises still have power is offensive to techcyder here.

      They have taken that fact as evidence that nothing bad happens to people with penises, and therefore they have proof against any argument they dislike, regardless of relevance.

      Give them power or employment and you are wasting your money while creating a sexist hostile work environment ripe for lawsuits.

    21. Re: Hire stupid harassers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work for a large government entity, and we currently have a liberal gov't, in a much further left country than the US. And we do have some weird courses talking about how not to accidentally act like an asshole. The thing about those courses is that they are 95% common sense and 5% shitty buzzwords. The problem is that for some people - specifically the ones might end up on the wrong end of a complaint - it's not common sense.

      I agree there is absolutely complete bullshit PC stuff out there, but most people are smart enough to ignore it without associating it to the entire spectrum left of their personal beliefs. Just like when I see some idiot on TV claiming shit about entire racial demographics, I don't think that every person to the right of me supports it.

    22. Re: Hire stupid harassers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It's kinda bizarre Mashiki thinks this is a problem, for those of us who aren't enemies of the revolution we recognize the need for reeducation and occasionally are given something to think about that's new, for those that are, well, you kinda need to be reminded to not be one, that's the entire point of them."

          - Comrade Squiggleslash

    23. Re:Hire stupid harassers by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Time to link my favourite shit-eating grin on Youtube:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    24. Re: Hire stupid harassers by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      And your original claim is still bullshit. I note that you're industriously moving the goalposts though.

      Are moving the goal post? No, sorry they're not. Rather you've contributed nothing from your original post, and contributed nothing in your follow up reply. Want to try again?

      I had one on harassment, none on the other topics you're angry about. I don't really see a problem with it because I'm not a massive snowflake who's so precious that I get triggered when someone tells me it's possible for me to behave in an unacceptable way.

      Oh it's not anger, it's disgust. Something that any rational person should feel when they're told by a 3rd party that mentioning the smell of christmas trees is a micro-aggression. You are proving that the left can't meme though, so it's unacceptable for you to refuse to be baited by the women that engages in sexual harassment with male employees? The same actions that would lead a male to be fired.

      Yeah I noticed that you're perpetually aggrieved that you can't behave exactly how you want with zero consequences. I also noticed that your claims are so overblown as to be flat out wrong

      Haven't quite figured out yet why the vast majority of people are sick of political correctness yet have you. Looks like you're simply a moral authoritarian and have a desire to impose your morality and sensibilities on everyone else.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    25. Re: Hire stupid harassers by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      It's kinda bizarre Mashiki thinks this is a problem, for those of us who aren't assholes we recognize the need for them and occasionally are given something to think about that's new, for those that are, well, you kinda need to be reminded to not be one, that's the entire point of them.

      The comrade will only engage in policies and actions approved by the party.

      Some people want businesses and work environments to be rotten horrible places where nobody feels comfortable except the biggest assholes. The rest of us...

      Strange, because most people according to business survey's find that imposing more rules to stifle people to "avoid offence" make a business and work environment a less welcoming place. Might have something to do with the entire culture that currently exists around tiptoeing and regulating speech around every person in order to keep your job.

      What a fun place to work, who wants to be part of the collective? It looks like...it's you!

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    26. Re:Hire stupid harassers by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      The chilling proof of this statement can be seen by the fact that literally no men are now CEOs or Senators, judges, professors, doctors, etc.

      And the reality is, the chilling proof of government stepping in and mandating by law that a company must have women on their boards/percentage of hires/etc. Not the best, not the most skilled, but women because that's why.

      Ever wonder why so few people now support feminism, and are railing harder then ever for egalitarianism?

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    27. Re: Hire stupid harassers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only altcuck broflakes think the NPC meme is clever.

    28. Re: Hire stupid harassers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These claims are modded up because many people have at least anecdotal evidence from their own environment that they are true. If you work for a large corporation, I’m sure you’ve had your course on “micro-aggressions”, [...]

      In the real world, that practically never happens. It is true that there are complete and utter morons who need to be taught how to act like professionals in an professional environment, and they do ruin it for everyone else, but I've worked in a few large organisations in recent years and "micro-aggression" courses are literally not a thing anywhere that I've seen.

      And before you say anything, my anecdote is just as scientifically valid as yours is.

    29. Re: Hire stupid harassers by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

      True, though. I've also had an hour of online sexual harassment training and basically nothing else in that list.

      I assume that, for some reason, laboratory safety training, handling of personal information training, etc don't fall under the same umbrella.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    30. Re: Hire stupid harassers by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Something that any rational person should feel when they're told by a 3rd party that mentioning the smell of christmas trees is a micro-aggression.

      It's interesting you keep simply inventing stuff but are so angry about it that you think it's real.

      That never happened.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    31. Re:Hire stupid harassers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  14. What is next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    What will be the next demand? This is starting to look like a college campus and not a company.

    1. Re:What is next? by ma1wrbu5tr · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Exactly. They've not only mass jumped on a #metoo opportunity, but they're also talking how big G is too dominated by males. Google is about to let itself be overrun in leftist politics.

      --
      Why can't we go back to using jumpers to configure slot adapter cards? Why? I say!
    2. Re:What is next? by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      What's wrong with a company being forced to do something other than being a psychopathic profit driven machine?

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    3. Re:What is next? by rossz · · Score: 1

      I was going to say "cookies and milk", but they already get that.

      How about nap time? Oh, wait ...

      --
      -- Will program for bandwidth
    4. Re:What is next? by Mashiki · · Score: 3, Interesting

      What's wrong with a company being forced to do something other than being a psychopathic profit driven machine?

      Nothing of course. But ask yourself why you'd want your company to start operating like Mizzou or Evergreen Collage. Then ask exactly how such environments are going to keep people happy and productive, when it degenerates into hostile cliques of people who witch hunt others because they're triggered.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    5. Re:What is next? by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      Milk?! According to PETA, drinking milk is racist. No, I’m not kidding but I really wish I were.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    6. Re:What is next? by dj245 · · Score: 1

      What will be the next demand? This is starting to look like a college campus and not a company.

      Hopefully they will demand compulsory enrollment in the Selective Service and greater opportunities to be welders, firefighters, and concrete workers.

      But that would never happen.

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    7. Re:What is next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Milk?! According to PETA, drinking milk is racist. No, I’m not kidding but I really wish I were.

      Of course. Milk is WHITE.

    8. Re:What is next? by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      Nothing, but if it's trading that for being a psychopathic politics-driven machine, it's not an improvement.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
  15. Doesn't matter. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is all that Slashdot cares about anymore. This "SJW" monster they've invented in their minds to vilify people who are angry about things they don't personally care about, but might tangentially affect them eventually. Maybe. We all need a bogeything to rally against, be it "evul femunists" or "anti-meritocratic agents" or whatever other nonsense makes us less threatened when the world around us shows signs of not revolving around us.

    1. Re: Doesn't matter. by c6gunner · · Score: 5, Funny

      We all need a bogeything to rally against

      Especially the SJWs.

    2. Re: Doesn't matter. by ma1wrbu5tr · · Score: 1

      Heh

      --
      Why can't we go back to using jumpers to configure slot adapter cards? Why? I say!
    3. Re:Doesn't matter. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      god damn you are a fucking retarded faggot

    4. Re: Doesn't matter. by Mashiki · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Especially the SJWs.

      Well there's a difference between SJW's and 'bogeythings.' Bogeythings don't have an impact on society, don't go after your job, and further try to ruin future employment, and don't try to censor things. SJW's do. If you don't think so, why not go ask the round of progressive professors who've lost their jobs because someone got offended and rallied the mob over their opinion on Halloween costumes, or refusing to play along with their "whitey is the cause of all world ills" stances.

      It's funny just how racist so many SJW's are though, especially with their cries of 'everyone else is a racist.'

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    5. Re:Doesn't matter. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not too Trotsky-slut are ya snowflake ... hehehe ... Bust yo face ... break yo nee ... make you bleed each time ya pea.

    6. Re:Doesn't matter. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gargle on it snowflake. bust yo face smash yo nee make ya bleed each time ya pea

    7. Re: Doesn't matter. by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 2

      Even that seemingly PC word of theirs: “person of colour” (PoC) is deeply racist. Basically it means “everyone except the whiteys”.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    8. Re: Doesn't matter. by c6gunner · · Score: 2

      It's also apparently WAAAAAAY different than "coloured person" for some fucked up reason.

    9. Re: Doesn't matter. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope they all choke on PC and SJW crap. I hate it but i am committed now to make them choke on it.

    10. Re: Doesn't matter. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SJWs are an actual issue and they should all be dealt with as harshly as possible. So harshly that it makes Hitler looks like a pacifist.

    11. Re: Doesn't matter. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your research is wrong. There has been a study of fired teaching staff at US universities. It turns out that a large majority of all those who declare themself fired for political reasons consider themselves leftwing or 'liberal' in us parlance. There is an absolutely tiny amount of people who think they have been fired for being right wing or non-pc.

      You are just repeating media stories who bear no relation to reality.

    12. Re:Doesn't matter. by darth_borehd · · Score: 1

      I agree. I have watched one side build this strawman "SJW femin-NAZI" image that they attack mercilessly over and over without actually addressing any points.

      It saddens me that the other side has constructed a "MRA" strawman as well.

      We need to realize that the common enemy is unwanted baggage from traditions, religion, and culture. We have issues that affect every one. LIsten to one another. Swap the words around and see your opponents arguments are mirroring your own.

    13. Re: Doesn't matter. by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Especially the SJWs.

      ...go ask the round of progressive professors who've lost their jobs because someone got offended and rallied the mob over their opinion on Halloween costumes, or refusing to play along with their "whitey is the cause of all world ills" stances.

      LMAO, remember last year when Berkeley staff and educators had to use an escape hatch to flee SJW protestors?

      Good times.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    14. Re: Doesn't matter. by yuriklastalov · · Score: 1

      Word order implies racism, bigot.

    15. Re: Doesn't matter. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      95% of all university professors consider themselves "progressives" so yeah, no fucking shit the majority of those fired will also think of themselves that way. They got rid of the repuclians on campus a long time ago. That's the truly hilarious part; most of those being fired over PC bullshit aren't even right wing. It's just the left eating itself.

    16. Re: Doesn't matter. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lulz

    17. Re: Doesn't matter. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because they're PEOPLE first, COLORED second?

      It's all euphemisms anyway, to paper over the ugly truth.

      As George Carlin put it, “Smug, greedy, well-fed white people have invented a language to conceal their sins. It’s as simple as that.”

    18. Re: Doesn't matter. by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

      There's no money or prestige in being reasonable

    19. Re: Doesn't matter. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bogeythings don't have an impact on society, don't go after your job, and further try to ruin future employment, and don't try to censor things. SJW's do. If you don't think so, why not go ask the round of progressive professors [...]

      Let me introduce you to Turning Point USA. They even maintain a blacklist.

    20. Re: Doesn't matter. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The sad thing about George was the he seemed to believe that being well fed and being white were both sins.

    21. Re: Doesn't matter. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, but he could see what sins this particular group of greedy white people committed to stay well-fed.

  16. Some stayed in the building? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    What’d they do... sit at their desks with their hands folded on their laps?

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:Some stayed in the building? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They took advantage of all the free in-office services their evil employer forces upon them, like lunches, massages, gardens, and sushi.

    2. Re:Some stayed in the building? by Daralantan · · Score: 1

      That's what I was going to ask. Did they not walk out because the weather was too uncomfortable? Big showing for your cause, taking a paid break to hang out w/ friends at the company in the company break room.

    3. Re:Some stayed in the building? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They sat at their desks, had a wank, talked about which girl was the hottest and generally farted and ball-scratched the day away.

    4. Re:Some stayed in the building? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      They sat at their desks, had a wank, talked about which girl was the hottest and generally farted and ball-scratched the day away.

      Ah yes, the fabled 1950s Golden Age.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  17. Anybody else noticed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That this has only been a thing since said employees began to be butthurt, younger millennials? You could cut a fart and they'd find something sexist about it. Impossible to take seriously. May the Bay at least be pretty when it burns to the ground because of this infantile garbage.

  18. Because male = guilty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The man is clearly guilty because ... because you don't need a trial to know that every straight man is guilty of harassment.

    1. Re:Because male = guilty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, only dicks. The difference is not hard to make, but I guess it's to much to ask from socially-inept autistic INCELs like you.

    2. Re:Because male = guilty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, straight males have dicks.

  19. 11am? by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

    So, really everyone just went out to lunch? An 11am walkout is symbolic at best.

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  20. Solidarity with all striking workers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Never cross a picket line, and fuck class traitors.

  21. And the whole thing is horseshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Here's why: I worked at Google. At Google, today, you can't as much as argue with a feminist (and I'd bet money most of Google's female employees consider themselves that), let alone sexually harass anyone for real. I once called out a female SJW on internal Google+ for "kill all white men" type of rhetoric. This promptly resulted in her reporting me to HR for "harassment". This is the kind of offense threshold we're talking about here. Does Google have bad apples? Any company of 85K people has at least a few. Can you get fired for as much as looking at some female co-worker wrong? 100% you can, if you're not Andy Rubin or the like. There is "process" for that: you get reported to HR, and security will walk you out the door for a mere "credible" accusation, no evidence or physical contact required. So the whole thing is SJW bullying plain and simple. If you're not walking out with them, you're misogynist bigot and literally a Nazi. So glad I don't work there anymore.

    1. Re:And the whole thing is horseshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Sorry, bullshit. I work at Google and have for over 10 years. "Kill all white men" type of rhetoric won't fly. I've never heard of anyone getting terminated for looking at a coworker wrong. I manage a reasonably large organization and deal with HR frequently. The process for harassment claims is not "HR assume the accused is guilty and terminates immediately". Are you a person or a right wing bot?

    2. Re:And the whole thing is horseshit by aberglas · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It is difficult for an outsider to know which is the truth.

      But we do all know how Damore was treated.

      Only one data point. But went to the CEO.

    3. Re:And the whole thing is horseshit by AbRASiON · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I have a friend in Google who is Constantly telling me what the op said. It's full sjw infestation "with us or against us"

      Having now actually visited a campus, it was EXACTLY how the movies, tv and gtav depict.

      I saw /mostly/ women, mostly young and mostly hip looking types. I'm 40 and out of the 300 ppl I saw, I'd say teen were my age or older.

      I saw less then 5 "typical nerds" that we generally look like, balding, overweight dudes who look a bit shy / insure of themselves.

      My contact tells me the vast majority of real work is done by about 15% of the staff. It was seriously like a high school cafeteria.

    4. Re:And the whole thing is horseshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Here's why: I worked at Google ... So glad I don't work there anymore.

      So am I. Oh boy, so am I !!

      I was amongst the first batch hire by Google, some twenty odd years ago. It used to be fun and satisfying working there.

      The situation worsen, but at that time it was still 'tolerable', until the time they got that Indian on the helm, then all hell broke loose.

      That's the time I started packing, and never looked back.

    5. Re: And the whole thing is horseshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry. No one believes your obvious lies.

    6. Re:And the whole thing is horseshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I wasn't "terminated", but I did have a sit-down with HR. Some time later I left on my own. I suspect I'm on a blacklist somewhere now, marked as "do not rehire".

      Try it. Find an example of the obviously extremist rhetoric on internal G+ and try to call out the person on it. Better yet, post a clever meme on Memegen ("constant struggle" would do the job). You'll see for yourself. Google is brimming with SJWs who are constantly on the lookout for new things to be offended by. If you do not constantly signal your virtue by supporting their dogma you will be ostracized.

    7. Re:And the whole thing is horseshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gee, another PHB clueless manager trying to suck up. Whoda thunk it?

    8. Re:And the whole thing is horseshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you believe in science?

      Test it. Proclaim and defend a position that the wage gap does not exist and women have more rights than men today (the two women have that men don't is that in most states women can't be tried for rape and they can abort an unwanted pregnancy without consent of the other parent). Both true facts. Easy to prove. Easy to be fired after defending them.

      If your claim about Google is right, you will keep your job. If the other poster is, you will get the benefit of working somewhere sane.

      Do it and report back.

    9. Re:And the whole thing is horseshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can I make a suggestion? Don't engage in that kind of conduct at work. Keep your opinions to yourself no matter how right you are if it doesn't concern work. You voluntarily engaged in a topic that was likely to cause trouble. Don't do that. Be a professional.

    10. Re:And the whole thing is horseshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      OP here: literally anybody in the trenches trying to challenge even the smallest facet of liberal dogma will face a fate similar to Damore's. Think gender dysphoria is a mental illness (many psychiatrists agree)? Don't want to use ever more bizarre pronouns? Think wage gap doesn't exist? Don't like illegal migrants (sorry, they aren't "undocumented immigrants")? Wear a MAGA hat? They will eventually chase you out, it's not even a question.

    11. Re:And the whole thing is horseshit by serviscope_minor · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I saw less then 5 "typical nerds" that we generally look like, balding, overweight dudes who look a bit shy / insure of themselves.

      I thought typical nerds were very skinny and pale and shy.

      Or are they overweight with a cheeto dusted "Han shot first" t shirt, a huge neckbeard and an astoundingly arrogant attitude.

      What am I meant to be?

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    12. Re:And the whole thing is horseshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      When you work for a gigantic megacorp, the rule is not to rock the boat. When you rock the boat you get thrown overboard, no matter how right you are. You work within the system or get tossed. Damore didn't work within the system. He got tossed. If he'd shut up, kept his head down, and done some damn work, he'd still be working there. Or he could have just quit and found another opportunity if the environment was that unbearable. Doesn't matter that the company says they value employee engagement. They don't, just like when a company tells you on hold that your call is important to them. It's not. You're costing them money. They'd replace you with a machine if they could. Don't make yourself a target and get some work done. Save it for church if you want to preach.

    13. Re:And the whole thing is horseshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, do as I say, not as I do? That's your general message there.

    14. Re:And the whole thing is horseshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Chances are that 15% of work probably is being done by precisely the people you're sexistly judgmental about.

      Do you even read, or are you just trying to validate their opinion?

    15. Re:And the whole thing is horseshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That's all well and fine, until everyone else around you is doing the things you disagree with, and then you notice the environment isn't the same. I would hate it if the environment where I worked changed for the worse, and I would feel remiss if I didn't speak up about it. Your job, for most, is your second home. You spend 40+ hours a week there.

    16. Re:And the whole thing is horseshit by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

      I think you need to reread my post.

    17. Re:And the whole thing is horseshit by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      I saw /mostly/ women, mostly young and mostly hip looking types.

      Seems unlikely as Google's own stats say that women are a minority in their company. Also if you look at the photos in TFA you can see that there are more men than women protesting.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    18. Re:And the whole thing is horseshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Just a casual observer in all of this, working quietly in a small company without any of this stuff going on, but in reading your comment I couldn't help but see you as also describing everyone who decided to protest yesterday and not show up for work. They're not working within the system - they're not showing up for work at all. They're not shutting up, nor keeping their heads down, nor doing some damn work. Do you believe all of them will get tossed like Damore did? Do you think they should?

    19. Re:And the whole thing is horseshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup. Welcome to the village mob.

    20. Re:And the whole thing is horseshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jokes on everyone else, those 15% of guys own all the shares and when hiring the other 85% only chose to hire hot women. Not their fault some are feminists. In fact sometimes you have to pay extra for that sort of treatment from a women!

    21. Re:And the whole thing is horseshit by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I have a friend in Google who is Constantly telling me what the op said. It's full sjw infestation "with us or against us"

      Having now actually visited a campus, it was EXACTLY how the movies, tv and gtav depict.

      I saw /mostly/ women, mostly young and mostly hip looking types. I'm 40 and out of the 300 ppl I saw, I'd say teen were my age or older.

      I saw less then 5 "typical nerds" that we generally look like, balding, overweight dudes who look a bit shy / insure of themselves.

      My contact tells me the vast majority of real work is done by about 15% of the staff. It was seriously like a high school cafeteria.

      On a similar note, I've started to notice how young police officers look these days!

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    22. Re:And the whole thing is horseshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are running around telling your coworkers that they are mentally ill and/or not worth the same salary as you then I can see why you'd get into trouble.

    23. Re:And the whole thing is horseshit by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      After the lawsuit, Damore will never have to work again.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    24. Re:And the whole thing is horseshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ^ this ^

      I wish I had mod points.

    25. Re: And the whole thing is horseshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Above post is bullshit.

    26. Re:And the whole thing is horseshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So... if you're not as fucking stupid as Damore and not as unprofessionally sleazy as Rubin you're fine? So far I'm not hearing a downside.

    27. Re:And the whole thing is horseshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Or are they overweight with a cheeto dusted "Han shot first" t shirt, a huge neckbeard and an astoundingly arrogant attitude.

      Yes, here is a typical example.

  22. Something cannot be explained by sentiblue · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I definitely don't get this for the life of me. In every country, whether it's legal or not, people can pay for sex. In this case, the guy in question has lots of money. He can pay for as many companies as he'd like. And in most (if not all) cases, he will get much more good looking ones than the ones he tried to harass. Why in the world would he go and try having sex with somebody at work knowing it will get him in trouble? This just doesn't make any sense.

    1. Re:Something cannot be explained by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Poor impulse control isn't too uncommon.

    2. Re:Something cannot be explained by hyades1 · · Score: 2

      If there's an element of exerting power and control involved as well as sex, then it makes perfect sense. Is there a better way to prove your absolute and complete dominance over a reasonably attractive female employee...maybe one with a husband or boyfriend...than to tell her to lie down and spread or watch her career go to hell?

      If you're that kind of scumbag, you're going to do this every time you think you have a chance of getting away with it.

      --
      I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
    3. Re:Something cannot be explained by Calydor · · Score: 0

      Do you want 'a car' or a very specific car when you need a new vehicle?

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    4. Re: Something cannot be explained by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's about power, not sex.

      By your word use in the title, I'm guessing yer either austic spectrum ish or Ukrainian? The better English would be perhaps "explain this to me" or "makes no sense". The use of "something" is.. awkward.

    5. Re:Something cannot be explained by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      People want what they can't have. As you say, he has money, he can just pay for it... But that's less rewarding than having to work for it. There is less excitement, no will she/won't she uncertainty, making the payoff less satisfying.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  23. Not a good long-term move by hoofie · · Score: 1

    If employees feel they have to protest against their own employer fine

    BUT...

    I can guarantee you everyone single of them who walked out or protested or went on social media about it is has now effectively destroyed any career at Google. They won't be fired [especially in Europe] but they won't be promoted or advanced and will be first in line if it's redundancy time.

    Corporations are self-protecting entities.

    Also I'd suggest they Google [heh heh] the concept of "Biting the hand that feeds you"

    1. Re:Not a good long-term move by hyades1 · · Score: 1

      Sometimes "the hand that feeds you" is also the one trying to get a finger up your fanny. If enough employees object, Google will actually have to reform its corporate culture to bring it more in line with the part of its original (now quietly emended) mission statement that said, "Don't be evil".

      In Europe, employees have a lot more tools at their disposal to fight back against employers who act the way you describe. In North America, they'd be toast. In Europe, they have a fighting chance.

      --
      I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
  24. I installed Google Walkout and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My phone and email and office softare stopped working and now friendly armed men from the DHS are investigating my family..

  25. A Smart Pokemon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The employees wants his head,
    but Picachu is very smart, he is with the employees, fully supporting their walk out!
    So Smart!

  26. Could have been a misunderstanding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From one of the articles: "The woman, with whom Mr. Rubin had been having an extramarital relationship, said he coerced her into performing oral sex in a hotel room in 2013, according to two company executives with knowledge of the episode"

    So they were having a sexual relationship. For some reason after she gave him a blow job she decided he coerced her into doing it. Who knows why?

    I can tell you one personal story: I was dating a chick who was into dom/sub stuff. She liked being tied up and for me to be "masterful" with her. She gave me a copy of "The story of O" so I would know what she liked.

    Anyway one night after she blows me she looks up and she's in tears. I asked "What's wrong?" and she says "You didn't have to force me". I couldn't believe what I was hearing. I said "How the hell am I supposed to know that THIS time you don't want to be a sub if you don't tell me???" The whole thing freaked me out. I couldn't get away from her fast enough.

  27. Anonymous reporting by rossz · · Score: 3, Interesting

    They want to be able to anonymously accuse someone of sexual harassment. I'm sure no one would abuse a system that would allow you to destroy someone's life without repercussions.

    --
    -- Will program for bandwidth
    1. Re:Anonymous reporting by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      Many companies have something in place where employees can anonymously report ethics violations. It’s anonymous because the accused often is a boss or close co-worker of the person reporting the violation. This sort of stuff cannot go through the regular chain of command and should be anonymous for it to be effective

      The real question is: what happens with such accusations? Is there a proper investigation and a presumption of innocence until proven guilty? Or is it a #metoo witch hunt?

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    2. Re:Anonymous reporting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real question is: what happens with such accusations? Is there a proper investigation and a presumption of innocence until proven guilty? Or is it a #metoo witch hunt?

      With ethics violations you get an investigation.

      With a sexual assault accusation you're automatically done for. Even if they find no evidence, the accusation will always hang over you. A company with an activist workforce like Google can't just close the case when there's no evidence. The mob demands a sacrifice.

    3. Re:Anonymous reporting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even less than posting AC on slashdot, this process often is anonymous in name only. Any detailed complaint about an actual situation WILL give enough information to figure out exactly who made it, and even if immediate direct action is blocked, retaliation will likely be the ultimate result.

    4. Re:Anonymous reporting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, let them have this. Please.

      Then you can report each and every SJW for sexual harassment - anonymously. No repercussions, for it is all anonymous. And you can report the same SJWs over and over - and they won't even know it is from the same guy, if you vary the wording.

      This is a weapon that works both ways.

  28. Simply fire all females by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the sjw world it is impossible 4 males to not harass females. Best keep a 59 ft fence between the sexes. That way white and blacks can die out. Sjws have no problem with Latino cat calls, but if a white male says hello to a female you have instant misogyny and racism. Paradoxically if a male ignores a female that is also misogyny. Sjws don't hate misogyny. They hate white males. Fuck it. Let's ignore the criticism and insist a women's place is making babies or sandwiches. Bitches ain't nothing but baby making machines. If a Ho ain't got a good man she is useless. Why the fuck would u hire someone that is going to sue you ass

  29. Private arbitration? WTF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Isn't sexual harassment illegal. So how can Google require employees to go through private arbitration for crimes? Tell the police, not your HR drone. Same for college students too. Campus police protect the school, not you. Corporate police (HR) protect the company, not you. Real police protect society, which sometimes includes you. At least you'll have a chance and retaliation against you for contacting the police is illegal.

  30. So they went to lunch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So they "walked out" at 11 then came back? essentially taking a lunch break. I'm sure that's going to drive change at google. If it's so bad then quit.

  31. Reasons by sproketboy · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Leftie: "Everyone should go to University! It's a Human Right!"
    Normie: "Er, everyone can go to university. What's the problem?"
    Leftie: "NOOO! Poor Brown people can't because Poor, Brown, Misogyny, Racism, Patriarchy, NAZIS!"
    Normie: "Huh? We have bursary and scholarship programs. Kids with good grades can fill out a form and get their education paid for. So what's the problem?"
    Leftie: "REEEEEEEEEEEE! Everyone should go to University! It's a Human Right! REEEEEEEEEEEE!"
    Normie: (sigh) "Ok, assuming you're right, how do you propose to pay for all that. University education is expensive."
    Leftie: "Well tax the rich of course! Tax the evillll corporations!"
    Normie: "Fuck Off"

    Leftie thinks about this for a while rubbing 2 brain cells together then comes back.

    Leftie: "I've got it! Why not a student loan program! We can setup yet another government bureaucracy to manage it! Big Government YAY!"
    Rightie: "Hmmm, my banker friends would like that. They can profiteer from that. I think we need to ask University Administrators what they think of this."
    Universities: "So what you're saying is we can take everyone in and we'll just get paid no matter what? HOLY SHIT THAT'S FANTASTIC!!!!"

    Results:

    Now Universities are all about asses-on-seats and not about higher learning.
    It gets worse. Universities pressure professors and threaten their tenure if they fail too many students. Sorry Quantum Field Theory is hard...
    It gets worse. Universities emphasize retardo courses like gender studies, intersectionality, postmodernism, Harry Potter, Star Wars, etc..
    It gets worse. Kids get saddled with 50000 of debt and useless degrees living at home with mommy and daddy into their 30's.
    It gets worse. Now we have a situation where universities can charge whatever they want for tuition fees. 200+% over CPI.
    It gets worse. Because courses get dumbed down Industry has trouble finding good candidates and therefore look outside. > 50% PHDs are H1B visas.

    Solution: Kill the student loan programs. Whoops not so easy when the Banks, Government and University Administrations all support it.

    1. Re:Reasons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think a strawman from the opposing political party is the culprit here. Strong partisans are simply useful idiots for those really in power. No one who is making big money on student loans (interest rates are high, you can't ditch them in bankruptcy and they're virtually guaranteed by the federal government) gives two shits about left vs right or social justice or any of that shit. That was their ad campaign to get people to buy into paying out the ass for school and on usurious credit at that.

    2. Re:Reasons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Solution: Banish truancy laws.

    3. Re:Reasons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've got my vote

    4. Re: Reasons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are an idiot seriously.
      I bet you pine for the good ol days when your neighbor was white, and your son liked women.

    5. Re: Reasons by sproketboy · · Score: 1

      I don't care what NPC's say.

    6. Re: Reasons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't care what altfags say so I guess we're even.

    7. Re: Reasons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I pine for the good old days when my neighbor didn't mind that *I* was white, and women liked my son!

  32. Yes, you are talkin horseshit by Martin+S. · · Score: 0

    If you got escorted out by security, then I'd bet my last buck that you did a lot more than simply 'call out' that comment.

  33. At 11am? by sabbede · · Score: 1

    Isn't that less of a protest and more of a long lunch? One you need to leave early for, because maybe you have a doctors appointment or need to run to the DMV.

    1. Re:At 11am? by clifwlkr · · Score: 1

      It's California, they are just showing up to work for the day then. If you scheduled it at 10am, nobody would be there yet.....

  34. Because it is about pwoer by aepervius · · Score: 1

    While in some case this is about sex (think clumsy coworker flirting borderline harassment, type) in the case of an executive like that there is a very good chance it was about him using his power and feeling the rush of it, rather than the sex.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
  35. This is ALL of YOU! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its hilarious how many of you talk about Google and all these other large companies being greedy, sociopathic companies only interested in profit. But these companies are NOTHING but a reflection of their stockholders. Honestly how many of you dig through your 401k's and portfolios and question the business practices of the companies you hold stock in???? You sit here and criticize them but as a stockholder you DEMAND a return.. or you'll sell. YOU vote with your dollars when it comes to this behavior. If someone told you tomorrow that Googles stock would triple.. you be lined up to buy it in spite of this behavior. So dont blame these companies for simply responding to YOUR demands.

  36. Does privacy mean nothing? by InvalidsYnc · · Score: 1

    The backlash was prompted by an article in The New York Times last week that revealed that Google had paid millions of dollars in exit packages to male executives accused of harassment, while staying silent about the transgressions.

    Isn't it an HR policy to NOT share personal information about someone? Wouldn't this be counter to a persons right of privacy?

    Yup, they're a pile of crap for what they did (if they did do it, and it wasn't just a baseless accusation), but does an employer really need to advertise why they got rid of someone? As far as the payouts, I'm sure there was something other than "Well, we think you're a good guy anyway, here, take a pile of money while we fire you for being accused of sexual harassment". Things are never cut and dry. It's not a binary world. There's an infinite distance between that 0 and 1...

    Happy Friday!

  37. Re:Private arbitration? WTF by WoodstockJeff · · Score: 1

    Sexual assault is a crime. Harassment, in and of itself, generally is not.

    And, in many cases, the victims do not want to be identified. Forcing it to be public would prevent a lot of victims from reporting, since THEIR names would be public, too.

  38. Fire them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I was there and this was going on it would be an easy decison: "No. Go ahead with out me. I have work to do!"

  39. Pretty weenie.... by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 0

    That was fucking lame and you know it. You've accomplished nothing. Demands? Really? You went back to work you fucking pussies!

    Stage a fucking strike or just fuck off. Posting photos on-line show what kind of narcissistic morons you are. Ooo I walked out. Ooo I posted a photo to instagram, then I want back to work. Management is not going to cave to demands if you don't really mean it. Cowards.

  40. Don't Be Evil by darth_borehd · · Score: 1

    Has been changed, to be really good at hiding the evil.

  41. Also, "women of color" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Times fails to mention that one of the demands is that google has to put more "women of color" into upper management positions, with "accountability" if it fails to do so.

    Google ceo Sundar Pichai appears to be rather brown, which possibly counts as a color, so maybe a declaration that he identifies as a woman would satisfy that demand?

  42. Re: Not the war on women you were looking for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This folks, is the way republicans actually fucking think.

    Notice how he didn't list any republicans that got caught having sex with MEN, then going on speeches condemning gay people.
    Notice how he didn't list any of the lies that trump has told us, or grab them by the pussy. Nope, it's all fake news, and of course it's the Democrats fault.

    No ones asking for free birth control. We just want the right to do with our body as we please.

  43. Google caretaker mode by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google is a caretaker for its existing products with no meaningful new products in the last X years.

    It's in a mid-life crisis.

    Exactly where are the new significant as in percentage of Google's top line revenue products?

    Stating, as much as I like the language, Go is amazing and used everywhere might be true but really not meaningful to Google's top line revenue.

    And a commodity item like a smart speaker in every house is only a tiny short term revenue maker.

  44. Re:Private arbitration? WTF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good points, thanks.