I think you can make the case that there are some indie games out there (still paid devs) and some open source utilities, but usually commercial software surpasses the volunteer stuff.
People could have disrupted the Waco incident... which over 60% of US citizens believe was criminally botched by the Clinton FBI.
Fasts forward a couple decades and the DoJ is trying to oust an elected president so it can GOVERN-SPLAIN to voters they aren't qualified to pick their own leaders.
I was saying Biden was explicitly politicizing something widely understood to not be political and the media loves that, but on the other food (a Republican crossing a technicality to do something the general public approves of - campaigning) they are met with derision and sanctimony.
The Logan act and the Hatch Act have been decried a LOT especially lately because they are based on the flawed and ugly premise that government can just stop politicians from being political by brute force regulation. Whoever believes that needs to revisit Locke/Hobbes and then let the voters decide who is worthy of the office.
The alternative is some measure of autocracy. Bleh !!
"Keep in mind the scummy Clinton Foundation donations are not actually a campaign donation."
Way too nuanced. Indicates inconsistency.
"Invite him to speak but leave off his title, and it's not a violation."
So perhaps the headline should be ammended to say, "Technicalities were violated !!"
OK. I accept your proposal!
"The Fairness Doctrine ended in the 1987 [wikipedia.org]."
True, but the dems fundraise on bringing it back. It has been brought to Congress several times since 1987.
"turned out the IRS was actually more lenient to tea party groups than left-wing groups"
Sprinkling "turned out" in there... nice. So why did Lois Lerner turn herself in over nothing? The internal policy explicitly directed IRS staff to target the tea party affiliated groups. That the NYTimes has an opinion about this absolves nothing... less than 30% of the US thinks that's an unbiased source. Politico has always been news for belt-way types.
How do you think the Senate confirms people? Answer: voting.
If a Republican is "violating laws" by saying Trump should be re-elected *GASP*... why is Biden allowed to say we should vote for judicial nominees because of their political affiliation?
The presidential office is widely understood (IMHO supposed to be) partisan and judges are supposed to be non-partisan. But it's OK for Biden to advocate for judges directly and openly based on their political views, but this Republican is apparently not allowed by the media to advocate for Trump.
It's all political now. The media just needs to grow up and accept that.
The longer the media gripes about this stupid stuff like Russia and Stormy the longer Trumps approval keeps rising.
There's widespread preaching about impeaching Trump... but nobody is able to answer why he should be impeached. The general public (and voters) are noting this. "If that's the best his critics have against him and the economy is taking off, he must be doing something right".
Good luck taking back the House in November when the president is at 51% and climbing.
The media's nonsense is a major gift to the GOP. So is Michelle Wolf.
What about when the Obama administration use the NEA to advocate for Obama care???
What about sending the IRS after the tea party?
What about using the "Fairness Doctrine" to shut down Rush Limbaugh?
What about how the DoJ employees use 90% of their personal earnings to donate to democrats they are investigating ?
What about Joe Biden telling everyone to vote against Robert Bork -a judicial nominee- because Bork wasn't a democrat?
What about the state department under Obama trading favors with foreign interests for domestic privileges and campaign donations?
This guy tells people he wants Trump re-elected and that is politicizing the federal government ??? What ??
Federal law says incumbents are allowed to campaign on military bases. That's because it was expected when the laws were written that people are going to have political views and they are going to fundraise and they are going to run for office !
Slashdot Mirror
Don't they know how unobjective they are to DISAGREE with slashdot.
Inconceivable !
Also, this proves perfectly that the best presidents in US history were Feuerbach, Chavez, and Harvey Milk.
#AwarenessAgainstRefusingMonolithicTruthsWhichAreThinlyVeiledOpinions
Let's go find some lawyers because someone owes me a million dollars.
Beats the Google and Apple options
Who do I go after if it has malicious behavior?
Fly by night mom and pop web app?
Pass
I do buy games on the PS4 store
The 5th highest grossing app on the iTunes store in 2014 earned its developer less than $5k.
Peanuts.
I think you can make the case that there are some indie games out there (still paid devs) and some open source utilities, but usually commercial software surpasses the volunteer stuff.
A lot of OSS SW btw is non-volunteer.
"So why did you leave this company?"
"Because I was sent to room 101"
"Oh how sad. We are not hiring you."
Think of all the crimes committed using the soil of North America by the criminals!
North America should be evicted !!
People could have disrupted the Waco incident ... which over 60% of US citizens believe was criminally botched by the Clinton FBI.
Fasts forward a couple decades and the DoJ is trying to oust an elected president so it can GOVERN-SPLAIN to voters they aren't qualified to pick their own leaders.
I wasn't saying Biden violated the hatch act.
I was saying Biden was explicitly politicizing something widely understood to not be political and the media loves that, but on the other food (a Republican crossing a technicality to do something the general public approves of - campaigning) they are met with derision and sanctimony.
The Logan act and the Hatch Act have been decried a LOT especially lately because they are based on the flawed and ugly premise that government can just stop politicians from being political by brute force regulation. Whoever believes that needs to revisit Locke/Hobbes and then let the voters decide who is worthy of the office.
The alternative is some measure of autocracy. Bleh !!
"Some of those keywords matched with Tea Party groups"
No !!! No no no!
"Tea Party" WAS the keyword. That's why moderate Boehner was insisting on prison for those involved.
A mea culpa from a low level lady in the IRS is highly insufficient on behalf of voters who don't want autocratic government corruption.
"The law exists so that people can not use their government position to influence elections. The violation is not a technicality."
Guess who doesn't care if a Republican tells people to vote for other Republicans while they are on the clock. Voters.
Meanwhile DACA is getting rammed down as an executive order.
This by comparison is technicality extremo.
"The Senate vote to confirm a nominee is not an election."
Originally I said it was a vote. You responded saying it wasn't an election. I didn't introduce the word "election".
"'We' don't vote for federal judges."
I meant that to say Biden was saying to his fellow Senators, "We" should vote for the guy if he's a solid D.
You are raising a technicality here that I understood already.
"Keep in mind the scummy Clinton Foundation donations are not actually a campaign donation."
... nice. So why did Lois Lerner turn herself in over nothing? The internal policy explicitly directed IRS staff to target the tea party affiliated groups. That the NYTimes has an opinion about this absolves nothing ... less than 30% of the US thinks that's an unbiased source. Politico has always been news for belt-way types.
Way too nuanced. Indicates inconsistency.
"Invite him to speak but leave off his title, and it's not a violation."
So perhaps the headline should be ammended to say, "Technicalities were violated !!"
OK. I accept your proposal!
"The Fairness Doctrine ended in the 1987 [wikipedia.org]."
True, but the dems fundraise on bringing it back. It has been brought to Congress several times since 1987.
"turned out the IRS was actually more lenient to tea party groups than left-wing groups"
Sprinkling "turned out" in there
How do you think the Senate confirms people? Answer: voting.
... why is Biden allowed to say we should vote for judicial nominees because of their political affiliation?
... but nobody is able to answer why he should be impeached. The general public (and voters) are noting this. "If that's the best his critics have against him and the economy is taking off, he must be doing something right".
If a Republican is "violating laws" by saying Trump should be re-elected *GASP*
The presidential office is widely understood (IMHO supposed to be) partisan and judges are supposed to be non-partisan. But it's OK for Biden to advocate for judges directly and openly based on their political views, but this Republican is apparently not allowed by the media to advocate for Trump.
It's all political now. The media just needs to grow up and accept that.
The longer the media gripes about this stupid stuff like Russia and Stormy the longer Trumps approval keeps rising.
There's widespread preaching about impeaching Trump
Good luck taking back the House in November when the president is at 51% and climbing.
The media's nonsense is a major gift to the GOP. So is Michelle Wolf.
Formulas evaluating formulas.
What about when the Obama administration use the NEA to advocate for Obama care???
What about sending the IRS after the tea party?
What about using the "Fairness Doctrine" to shut down Rush Limbaugh?
What about how the DoJ employees use 90% of their personal earnings to donate to democrats they are investigating ?
What about Joe Biden telling everyone to vote against Robert Bork -a judicial nominee- because Bork wasn't a democrat?
What about the state department under Obama trading favors with foreign interests for domestic privileges and campaign donations?
This guy tells people he wants Trump re-elected and that is politicizing the federal government ??? What ??
Federal law says incumbents are allowed to campaign on military bases. That's because it was expected when the laws were written that people are going to have political views and they are going to fundraise and they are going to run for office !
I'm pretty sure AI has been researched since the 1950's without much to show for it.
... people don't seem to like Alexa / Siri that much.
Not only is nothing NEAR Turing complete
Why would you want the people who cooked themselves on the land to be doing it for everyone on the high seas?
Tell me more about this bankruptcy you speak of that people have no say over.
You epitomize perfectly the hysteria against people profiting off medical research.
You would rather people die than anyone getting rewarded for saving lives.
Shouldn't people who save lives get massively rewarded?
Isn't life more important than stopping people from getting (what you think is) too much money?
The controversy ... as in this article here?
Oh, yeah, I feel completely comfortable with the media referring to itself to evaluate all kinds of stuff.
Ever hear of AI ?
Ever heard of Plato ... Socrates ...
...
If gravity was incoherent magnetism couldn't you cancel it out with a Faraday cage?
Or maybe you were being intentionally facetious
You're making a categorical statement based on a theorem that "proves" a claim.
How do theorems prove things?
Sounds like quite a step to take with a naked assertion.
I was pulling for Pocahontas