Slashdot Mirror


Prices Slashed For Nook, Kindle E-Readers

b0bby sends in a report from ZDNet about the sudden outbreak of a price war in e-reader devices. "On Monday, Barnes & Noble cut the price of the 3G Nook to $199. It also launched a $149 Wi-Fi version. Just hours later, Amazon responded by cutting the price of the Kindle to $189. At $259, the price of the Kindle and Nook just 24 hours ago, an e-reader purchase competed with an Apple iPad, which started at $499 for a Wi-Fi version. Below $200, a dedicated e-reader purchase makes a lot more sense." Sony dropped prices for its readers three months ago, but the move didn't kick off a price war at that time. Some believe that dedicated e-readers are doomed in the long run to lose out to general-purpose devices such as the iPad — and its coming imitators, many of which will be based on Google Android.

255 comments

  1. e readers are insanely overpriced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what are we talking, a 5-10,000% profit on each sale?

    1. Re:e readers are insanely overpriced by ShadowRangerRIT · · Score: 4, Informative

      e-Ink is more expensive than you think (I don't have a definitive price, but according to this link the cost to Amazon for the e-Ink display on the Kindle is $60 by itself). Tack on the cost of the processor, memory, networking gear, battery, casing, quality control, etc., and the supposed cost to Amazon is $185. Given that prices have probably dropped a bit since that report, I suspect they are making a small profit on each device (though of course the cost of warranty replacements probably removes even that). The money is in e-Book sales; each sale may be for less than the hardcover, and the publishers may take a large cut, but what remains is pure profit; sale and distribution of pure data is effectively free.

      --
      $_ = "wftedskaebjgdpjgidbsmnjgcdwatb"; tr/a-z/oh, turtleneck Phrase Jar!/; print
    2. Re:e readers are insanely overpriced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      what are we talking, a 5-10,000% profit on each sale?

      The e-ink screens that ereaders use cost about $75-90, even in bulk. By dropping prices down to ~$150, they're cutting their margins pretty thin in order to gain marketshare.

    3. Re:e readers are insanely overpriced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      sale and distribution of pure data is effectively free.

      Yeah it's not like they have to pay for bandwidth or anything...

    4. Re:e readers are insanely overpriced by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Probably nowhere near that high. E-ink screens are an oddball in process terms, so they don't share economies of scale with LCDs(which is why the real cheap seats in the e-reader market are black and white LCD devices, and why E-ink, inc. probably says a prayer of thanksgiving every time Pixel Qi's stuff gets delayed again). A fully pixel-addressable one of reasonable size and resolution is not inexpensive(unlike the cheesy region-addressable ones, which are fairly cheap). As discrete items, 3G modems suitable for computer use seem to go for 30-80 dollars. I'm assuming that they are cheaper in bulk; but that is still something extra on the old BOM.

      We are probably talking at least 100% above BOM; but I'd be surprised at anything markedly higher than the consumer electronics average. The real rip-off, though, is in the fact that you are paying all that just for the right to purchase a bunch of fancy bitstreams, generally for at least as much as the paperback equivalent, sometimes more, from somebody's proprietary storefront.

    5. Re:e readers are insanely overpriced by Coopjust · · Score: 1

      Text is small, bandwidth has become cheaper, and at this point the eBooks are barely cheaper than the regular books. The nook can only use 3G for the B&N store on device, and the Kindle has only a very basic web browser (it's barely usable, good for a quick wikipedia lookup but not any extended browsing).

      So the purchases more than make up for the 3G downloading.

    6. Re:e readers are insanely overpriced by westlake · · Score: 0
      what remains is pure profit; sale and distribution of pure data is effectively free.

      First you have to make the sale.

      Maintaining the Amazon.com web site is not free. Marketing the Kindle e-book catalog is not free. The web page for a popular book or series could easily be many times the size of the e-book download.

      There is no free lunch.

      Sales have to be properly documented, payments processed through Mastercard and Visa, accounts settled with the publishers.

    7. Re:e readers are insanely overpriced by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 3, Informative

      e-Ink is more expensive than you think (I don't have a definitive price, but according to this link [engadget.com] the cost to Amazon for the e-Ink display on the Kindle is $60 by itself).

      GP is still fundamentally correct - e-Ink displays are overpriced. The reason why that is the case is that there is a single company - E Ink Corporation - holding key patents on technology, and maintaining monopoly on production.

      Then again, what is "overpriced"? I paid $300 for a Sony PRS-505 two years ago, and, given the amount of use the device has got over that time period - more than any other gadget I own, with the exception of cellphone - consider it money well spent.

      So, YMMV - largely depending on what you read, and how much. For people who read fiction a lot (as in, 1 book per week or more), I'd highly recommend one.

    8. Re:e readers are insanely overpriced by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      The real rip-off, though, is in the fact that you are paying all that just for the right to purchase a bunch of fancy bitstreams, generally for at least as much as the paperback equivalent, sometimes more, from somebody's proprietary storefront.

      You can easily ignore the stores. Which eInk-based reader on the market today doesn't read books in open (as in, non-DRM'ed with a spec) file formats?

    9. Re:e readers are insanely overpriced by failedlogic · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think what he is talking about is taking FedEx or UPS out of the map. Amazon usually offers free shipping on orders over $25. I'm in Canada so its around $40. Anyways, I remember because there's a lot more stuff on Amazon.com (partner resellers etc), that people would find $0.99 items or less when their order was nudging on the free shipping price. That second item will cost Amazon more than its worth FWIW.

      A fair amount of bandwidth is gobbled up just browsing the Amazon website. Amazon has to upkeep their website anyways. So I think the cost of delivery of the digital goods which would probably be a few bits and bytes more than some other user is friendlier to Amazon's pockets than paying free shipping on parcel delivery regardless if its a minimum order or a $1000 order books or not. I'd wager digital delivery is also friendlier on the environment.

    10. Re:e readers are insanely overpriced by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

      It doesn't matter how much it costs to make. All that matters is what I'm willing to pay. For a device that's inferior to real books for reading, and completely incapable of real computing, I'd be willing to pay about $25, and that's only if I had full control over the device and could put any document I want on it. For a device that's tethered to Amazon and has DRM up to wazoo... they couldn't give the thing to me.

    11. Re:e readers are insanely overpriced by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      Only a complete fool would say that an ebook reader is inferior to real books.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    12. Re:e readers are insanely overpriced by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      I'd be willing to pay about $25

      While I agree that e-readers are way overpriced (as are all smart phones and the iPad), I think $25 is a bit extreme a price point to expect. Considering I can load it with a whole bunch of books, including my collection of PDF magazines and other documents, I'd go as high as $75 to $100, as long as it didn't have a lock-in to a particular book seller. If there is a lock-in, then I'd expect the device to be free or that I'd get paid something, perhaps a few ebooks to start me off.

      The iPad should be about $200 max, considering the app store lock-in. WiFi only, it should go for maybe $150 without a camera. The same device without a lock-in, and with an SD slot and camera, I'd go as high as $250 because I'd use it for light computing chores as well as communicating. I'm cool with waiting until the early adopter Apple-tax expires and the prices come down to Earth. Even then, except for travel days and occasional back-porch surfing, I don't see myself using it enough to make it worth more than that to me. There are only so many people to whom I can show it off before the novelty wears off and I'm stuck with another device I don't use very much. I'd read books on it, but mostly free ones because I mainly use the excellent public library with a few exceptions for authors that I think deserve my money. Having to pay inflated prices for ebooks is just not gonna happen. I don't need to carry more than a few books with me very often, and I'm not so old and feeble that I can't bear the weight of a couple of hardcover books.

      Do you remember the price of the original iPhone? I can get one now for $99 at AT&T and it will be a free upgrade soon, I bet. I bought my iPod Touch 2ndGen (or maybe 3rdGen. It's the latest 8gig model) at Woot for $129 of which probably $30 is still Apple tax. Considering I have to buy all my apps at the app store, I would think a larger portion of the selling price would be off-set by Apple, due to the locked-in revenue stream.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    13. Re:e readers are insanely overpriced by haystor · · Score: 3, Interesting

      When everyone says free, they are generally talking about the marginal cost.

      The marginal cost of an ebook is practically $0.00. The marginal cost of a $8 paperback is at least $2 (materials and physical movement of the book.)

      Taking a popular book as an example:
      Twilight by Stephanie Meyer
      paperback $7.99
      kindle $9.99

      So the marginal cost per book goes down and the price goes up. It's easy to see where customers think they're getting gouged when they're paying more for a cheaper copy that is more restrictive (no resell possible).

      --
      t
    14. Re:e readers are insanely overpriced by ppanon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not only that, but I own 20 year old paperbacks. It's not clear that Kindles will last anywhere near that long.

      --
      Laissez lire, et laissez danser; ces deux amusements ne feront jamais de mal au monde. - Voltaire
    15. Re:e readers are insanely overpriced by haystor · · Score: 2, Interesting

      On the other hand, I bought a Sony Reader and I love it. I just don't buy it for books I'll be reading more than once or books where the price difference won't justify a purchase. The reading experience on the Reader is better than a paper book. It lays flat, it can be held in a single hand or not at all. There is no curve to the page. There is no flipping hand positions from left page to right page...etc...

      Tons of free books out there have justified the cost for me. I just don't see it going mainstream until the price of books makes sense.

      --
      t
    16. Re:e readers are insanely overpriced by BlackCreek · · Score: 1

      You can hack the files and remove the DRM. It is a hassle but it (allegedly) works.

    17. Re:e readers are insanely overpriced by BlackCreek · · Score: 1

      For a device that's inferior to real books for reading, and completely incapable of real computing,

      I can:

      1. change the fonts, and font size of my e-reader
      2. stuff dozens of books there, and stop taking 10 physical book in my luggage when I go on vacation
    18. Re:e readers are insanely overpriced by Calinous · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There are things where an ebook reader is inferior to real books.
            Can you share books with your friends? Can you sell the books (or give some of them for free)? If you have two kids, can they read two different books you bought for your ebook?
      There are things the eBook Readers do better than paper books - but not all of them.

            How much would it cost you to buy one book? $$ versus $$$

    19. Re:e readers are insanely overpriced by Silver+Surfer+1 · · Score: 1

      My Sony PRS500 reads non drm books just fine. .lrf anfd .txt have always been drm free. Anymore though I have converted most of my e-books to the epub standard.

    20. Re:e readers are insanely overpriced by hairyfeet · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How so? Books are a communal thing, an eBook reader is not. My mom has been buying what was once considered 'trashy" Sci-Fi and horror paperbacks since the late 50s, thanks to her our public library gets to have one of the best classic Sci-Fi horror sections around, and my mom is on a first name basis with the librarians and most of the college girls in town thanks to her "need to free up shelf space" a couple of times a year. When she is in the library (which is often) she ends up chattering for ages with the local college girls, who want to know what she thinks of a particular artist/series or want to know if she has a missing book in some old fantasy series the girl is reading (which she often does) and they will sit there for ages discussing books.

      You just don't get interaction like that with an eBook. They are just little ones and zeroes, little chunks of DRM that are quickly not worth anything, even to the one who paid. I remember when this whole eReader fad came around last in the mid 90s, and just like today the publishers wanted too much money for DRM infested crap. Just like then I have a feeling it will all end up in the trash, while my mom and the college girls at the library swap the last fantasy authors over tea.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    21. Re:e readers are insanely overpriced by jimfrost · · Score: 1

      You raise some good points, but your "can they read two books you bought for your e-book" is off base. Sure, if you only have one e-book reader; if you have one per person it becomes much more flexible. For the last few years that was an expensive proposition (although in my experience the things paid for themselves in a few months) but prices are falling fast (and have you priced bookshelves recently?)

      My daughter has my old Kindle and my wife uses the Kindle reader on her phone. We can all share the same library, meaning for instance that my daughter and I can (and do) read the same book at the same time with only one purchase.

      One of the big wins for us, though, is space: We have thousands of paper books already, way too many to put on shelves. The expansion slewed a lot with the influx of e-readers.

      --
      jim frost
      jimf@frostbytes.com
    22. Re:e readers are insanely overpriced by knarf · · Score: 1

      Well, that is exactly what happened when music started to appear on compact disc. The price was double that of the vinyl version with the excuse of higher production costs and having to recoup investments. It took only a very short time - less than 6 months IIRC - for those production costs to be lower than those of vinyl records but the price stayed the same, double that of vinyl.

      Book publishers are trying to pull the same stunt here, only without the excuse of higher production costs. They want to use the shift from paper to electronic paper to jack up prices - and value perception. I have never gotten used to the high price of CD's, records used to cost around 17 (Dutch) guilders - the guilder was probably around half a dollar - when CD's were introduced for 42 guilders so that price has stuck in my head. Record = 17 guilders or now around 8 euro. As I stopped buying full-price records when I finally got a CD player I don't really know what they cost now but it will be more than what they're worth to me. The same goes for books, an electronic book should never - ever - cost more than a printed version. I'd pay half the price of the printed book directly to the author - who will make out like a bandit compared to what they get in the current scheme - but I will never - ever - pay a publisher more for less. They have tried to bite me many times and failed to do so, one more greedy mongrel won't change that.

      --
      --frank[at]unternet.org
    23. Re:e readers are insanely overpriced by tixxit · · Score: 1

      They may have a monopoly on e-Ink displays, but don't have a monopoly on (what I imagine is) their largest market; e-Readers. If they are actually overpriced (ie. they COULD charge less), then they should really rethink their business strategy before everyone ditches e-Readers for more general purpose tablets.

    24. Re:e readers are insanely overpriced by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      I'm a complete fool then.

      I have a several bookshelves full of real books, and on many many occasions I've loaned people those books to read and they've brought them back after enjoying them. Sometimes, they've even loaned them to a friend in between.

      Books have a versatility that DRM'd E-books can't have. And even without DRM, if all the books in the world were PDFs, plenty of people don't have convenient portable Ebook readers for me to share those PDFs with anyway.

      In a world where my purchase rights to share a book I bought with a friend or random stranger (or sell it at a garage sale) is protected instead of the DRM garbage that prevents me from exercising those rights, I might value Ebooks.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    25. Re:e readers are insanely overpriced by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      They may have a monopoly on e-Ink displays, but don't have a monopoly on (what I imagine is) their largest market; e-Readers.

      It's true, but eInk does have an objective advantage in this niche - at least judging by the sale figures of dedicated eInk readers.

      If they are actually overpriced (ie. they COULD charge less)

      Given the recent price drop from both B&N and Amazon, it would seem that they could.

      ... then they should really rethink their business strategy before everyone ditches e-Readers for more general purpose tablets.

      I think they're trying to milk the market for all it's worth before Pixel Qi stuff comes along. I'm not sure that general-purpose tablets are going to be a threat at the existing price and weight difference.

    26. Re:e readers are insanely overpriced by mdda · · Score: 1

      For increased levels of smug try the 'Calibre' OSS ebook management thing.

      Also, FYI, woot had a Sony Reader (one of the early ones) for $110 recently : that's getting to an impulse-purchase price-point.

    27. Re:e readers are insanely overpriced by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Except that the bandwidth runs over 3G networks to the device, so they eat that cost as well.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    28. Re:e readers are insanely overpriced by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      WHAT? I missed a ereader for 110$? I would have not even had to think about that purchase...arg!

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    29. Re:e readers are insanely overpriced by mark72005 · · Score: 1

      They do, but the small amounts of data moved through to these devices has to be incredibly cheap. Otherwise they wouldn't be including it at no cost.

      I'm very happy with my Sony Reader, which I purchased from woot for $100.

      No lock-in to Amazon's proprietary formats, all the functions I need from a reader, no poorly done implementation of features I'd just use my laptop for instead.

    30. Re:e readers are insanely overpriced by schwaang · · Score: 1

      Books have a versatility that DRM'd E-books can't have.

      Yes, though I'd rephrase that to "Books have a versatility that DRM'd e-books could have but don't."

      For example, Amazon could allow you to sell your "used" DRM'ed e-book by transferring the license. Similarly, Amazon could allow you to lend a DRM'd e-book (again, by brokering the license).

      I grant that even then you'd still only be able to do those things within the walled garden of that DRM scheme's ecosystem. (You could only sell an amazon kindle book to another amazon customer, which is less versatile than a book.)

      But the publishers and distributors have no will to provide that versatility. Which is why I still agree with your point.

    31. Re:e readers are insanely overpriced by Omestes · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't say they are inferior, you just trade different benefits for different costs.

      I was in the "dead pulp for life" gang too, awhile ago. But I borrowed my father's Kindle (more like he loaned it to me to figure out how it worked for him) and played with it a bit, and promptly decided to go out and get a Nook. I still love my room of books, and I still love the feeling of getting a new pulp book, and I still go out and buy too many physical books. But, the electronic format thing is also great. I like the ability to get free books (public domain, though piracy is possible for those who do that sort of thing), I like not having to carry bulky books around with me. Right now my Nook has around 70 books on it, I don't think I would be able to carry them around with me if they were physical. Some of them are reference books, which is always nice, and I am generally reading 3-4 books at a time, making lugging them around a bit tough.

      I also like the $9 price point, most of the time (it could, and should be lower). Books have gotten ridiculously expensive of late, so every little reduction helps. It saves the crap shoot of trying to find a specific book at the local used book store.

      Its a trade off, pure and simple. One is not superior to the other (for reading at least, nothing beats a good bookshelf full of good books).

      Also, with the Nook, you lose the proprietary Amazon format, and can loan (some) books, and borrow books from your local library with it.

      I've found that I generally demo books on my Nook, and if I like them I pick them up at the used bookstore for permanent storage. So it hasn't really acted as a "book replacement", it just a way to cram more books into a smaller, more convenient area. I don't trust the digital format enough for long term storage, and it lacks the comfort value of being able to admire books that you enjoyed.

      That said, the Nook, and ebook readers in general, completely fail at some things. Reading technical books is almost impossible. I read a lot of texts on philosophy, and my Nook is pretty much useless since I can't easily page around, or leave decent marginals on the fly. Its very hard to quickly skip back 200 pages to reference something previously written, which kills it for most academic reading.

      Obviously I'm not arguing against your tastes. If you HATE digital books then more power to you, you shouldn't read them. But to claim that they are inferior (objectively) is a bit silly.

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    32. Re:e readers are insanely overpriced by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      Yes, I can share books with my friends. I can even read the same book I gave to them, at the same time I gave it to them. And, the bonus is that it costs me nothing to buy the books. They're free. Yes, I read classical literature, and it does indeed make me a better person than you. I would mention that I don't watch TV, but I don't want to cause a smug alert.

      By comparison, purchasing all of the classical literature that I now read on my Kindle would be prohibitively expensive, and only one person would be able to read it at a time.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    33. Re:e readers are insanely overpriced by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      No, you're a fool because you assume that I buy my books.

      E-books are far superior to anything else, FOR SOME PURPOSES. That's the part you left out.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    34. Re:e readers are insanely overpriced by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      My books have no DRM. If you bought books with DRM, then you're the sucker, not anybody else.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    35. Re:e readers are insanely overpriced by cervo · · Score: 1

      The publishers are being very greedy with e-books. In reality if they priced the e-books the same as paperbacks I would probably still buy them since the e-books save shelf space (which is at a premium). If they were fair and when a book first comes out, they price the ebook at slightly less than the hard cover (since the physical cost savings are more with a hardcover than a paperback, maybe even $5 less or so). Then when the paper-back is released, the e-book should go down to at least the cost of the paperback. A hard cover does cost more than a paperback due to materials, but usually they charge way more than the price of materials. Then they keep the higher profit margin for a few months before coming out with the paperback with less profit margin. I think that is okay as long as they are fair with the e-books.

      Currently Barnes and Noble said that I don't get a membership discount on e-books because the publishers set a price. Also there are no sales, etc.. And in many cases the publishers are totally ripping us off. Several textbooks I got have an e-book at $60 while I found a soft cover for $40... Not that I would buy e-textbooks yet because e-ink is not the right platform for a textbook. Still Amazon was a bit crazy before selling every e-book for $5, it made publishers not want to come out with their latest offerings. I don't see why e-books cannot just be sold like normal books. Publishers wholesale them to retailers who then sell them to the customers for a different price. No $5 special deal. Sometimes bookstores run discounts on e-ink and Barnes and Noble applies membership discounts to e-books the same way it applies them to physical books. I didn't like the amazon $5 model because publishers wouldn't release a lot of works in e-book format or would release many months later. I don't like the apple model because the publishers are screwing us. I would prefer the old model applied to e-books. But publishers need to be realistic. You can't charge more for the e-book than your cheapest physical book. If the paperback is not out, then charge a bit less than your hardcover. Once the paperback comes out, you should charge a bit less than the paperback. In reality I might even pay if the hardcover only is out and the price is the same or the paperback only is out and the price is the same. But since there are less printing/binding costs, there should probably be a discount compared to paperbacks and even more of one compared to hardcover. Although most of the sometimes $10 or $20 difference in price is not physical materials...it is just profit margin. Publishers can try to keep the profit margin. But if printing costs are $2 for paperback and $5 for hard cover, they could sell an e-book for $5 less than the hard cover and $2 less than the paperback. it's not like they were pocketing that anyway....

      And on textbooks the physical books are over priced. Hopefully some enterprising teachers will make cheaper e-books (since they no longer need as much of an investment) and we can rip text books out of the greedy publishers. My personal favorite is how the Calculus books have 10 editions...Calculus hasn't changed that much in over a hundred years.... Mostly they just change the problem sets so that you need the new copy of the book to do the homework. People like that deserve to go out of business. And if e-books spell the way to wrestle control from publishers then all the better....

    36. Re:e readers are insanely overpriced by 3dr · · Score: 1

      The current price battle will make for interesting times. The Border's Kobo reader is interesting, but I'm waiting to learn more about the various book formats (epub, drm pdf, txt etc) and which ereaders are most compatible with a technoid. I.e., which reader will be easiest to put *my* documents into?

      The various old-book archives are making this much easier, too.

    37. Re:e readers are insanely overpriced by Calinous · · Score: 1

      I don't watch TV either, and you have absolutely no reason to consider yourself better than me because you read classical literature (you might be better than me, but I'm not qualified enough to judge that).
            Good points, and good post (I haven't thought about out-of-copyright books). However, the smugness (makes me a better person) rubs me the wrong way.

    38. Re:e readers are insanely overpriced by JimFive · · Score: 1

      I don't see why e-books cannot just be sold like normal books. Publishers wholesale them to retailers [...]

      How do you wholesale an e-book? Is the publisher going to tell the retailer, "you can only sell 10 of this book?" The wholesale/retail model works for physical goods because of the problem of getting the objects to the consumer in a distributed marketplace. E-books don't have this problem.
      --
      JimFive

      --
      Please stop using the word theory when you mean hypothesis.
    39. Re:e readers are insanely overpriced by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      No actually, you left it out of your original comment I replied to. My retort is therefore entirely valid. If you wish to change the parameters of your argument now, then so be it.

      I'd still rather have a dead tree version of almost any book that I can pass on to someone else easily than an electronic version they may not be able to read or access when and how they want.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    40. Re:e readers are insanely overpriced by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      I'm pointing out that your comment is nowhere as universal as you think it is. Once you start poking exceptions into it, it falls apart rather quickly.

      If you want a dead tree version, just print the fucking thing out. I'm not going to stop you.

      Now you're just defending your own bad position, because your inflated ego won't allow you to graciously lose to someone who called you a cocksucker, You cocksucker.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    41. Re:e readers are insanely overpriced by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      The smugness rubs you the wrong way? Can you think of a time when smugness rubbed you the right way?

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    42. Re:e readers are insanely overpriced by cervo · · Score: 1

      Well you have to buy rights to sell e-books in batches and reports of the # of sold books need to be sent to the publisher/wholesalers. And the system needs to be audited by an external third party.

      Basically it's just like accounting for money....

    43. Re:e readers are insanely overpriced by JimFive · · Score: 1

      I don't dispute that it would be possible to come up with a system of "wholesaling" ebooks. I dispute that it makes any sense to do so.

      Requiring the retailer to buy in batches means that at some point the retailer is going to be in a position where they have a customer for one book, but don't want to commit to the batch size. So the retailer needs to be able to order one ebook and sell it to the customer instantly (because the idea of being out of stock on an ebook is absurd). If they can do that, why would they ever tie up money to preorder a batch (except possibly for highly popular new releases (such as a new Twilight book).

      If the retailer can't just order one book then they get into a situation where they are better off not selling the ebook, which is bad for everybody.
      --
      JimFive

      --
      Please stop using the word theory when you mean hypothesis.
  2. EBOOK PRICES by birukun · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Until they drop Ebook prices, they can pound sand...... For those prices, Kindle/Nook should be free

    --
    Self Defense - A Human Right www.a-human-right.com
    1. Re:EBOOK PRICES by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I couldn't agree with you more.

    2. Re:EBOOK PRICES by Kitkoan · · Score: 1

      Thats the biggest issue I have with ebook readers. The price of the ebooks. I get a less usable book (can't really share it) for the same price as a real book. And a real book has more overhead to cover. Materials used to make the book, transportation costs, book sellers fee. These aren't a factor in an ebook (well the sellers fee is). Am ebook is just information on a server's HD and for the size of the ebook, the bandwidth isn't really much of an issue. Until the prices go down to something more reasonable for the ebooks, I'm not going to buy a reader regardless of the readers price tag.

      --
      Attention... all grammer nazi"s! Is they're anything; wrong with: my post,
    3. Re:EBOOK PRICES by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 1

      The Nook can display PDF, EPUB and other files, and you can load up a Micro-SD card with all the ebooks you can find.

    4. Re:EBOOK PRICES by straponego · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Agreed, the prices on ebooks are far too high. But if you are smart, ebook readers can be a good deal. There are a ton of free (and legal) ebooks out there. Old classics out of copyright are free, but also a decent library of newer SF. What pushed me to make the purchase was the price of a paper copy of Peter Watts' Behemoth... over $150 new, but free on his site. There's also Charles Stross, the Baen Free Library, etc... and I've barely started looking. The Nook store also has a fair number of freebies, but for the most part you'll have to download books from various sites and use Calibre to convert to one of the supported formats.

      Factoring in the free books, the average cost of the books in my nook is about what used books would cost, or a bit less. I haven't had time to get serious about filling it with free books, or it would be even lower. I'd be happy to buy many more books through their store, but I won't do so aggressively until prices are reasonable (at $5, I'd go nuts, and their profits would skyrocket; everybody wins. But I guess they don't like money). So the Nook will save me money over the year, though not as much as I'd prefer. I read a couple thousand pages during my vacation, so it saves on weight, space, and trees as well.

      If they raise the prices more (dick move, Steve Jobs), torrents of ebooks will become much more popular.

    5. Re:EBOOK PRICES by joh · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Until they drop Ebook prices, they can pound sand...... For those prices, Kindle/Nook should be free

      While I totally share the view that Ebooks are much less worth to the buyer (me) than "real" books, they're hardly cheaper to produce than paper books. Mass-production and distribution of paper books is *really* cheap these days and digital production and distribution isn't free either. This is an ugly and somehow absurd situation. But it's totally equivalent to the situation for authors: Most would make more money by flipping burgers instead of writing their books. Books are not an easy business.

      Most books are a net loss for both authors and publishers and the very few which make money make lots of money and have to pay for many others which earn them nothing at all.

      If you expect Ebooks to drop to a fraction of the price of paper books don't hold your breath. To make this possible you would have to cut out all the work that actually makes some text into a book; with most manuscripts (even good ones) this would mean you'd put out just crap that nobody wants to read. And that nobody knows about. Yes, there are exceptions but exceptions do not make markets. A book is a product and the author is only one part in the process.

      Go and read self-published books if you don't believe me. You can only rarely make a good book by just writing it. Most of the work going into a book is exactly the same regardless of the format.

      This does not mean that you couldn't make this more efficient. But books done the same way won't be cheaper just because you deliver bytes instead of printed paper.

    6. Re:EBOOK PRICES by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      The nook has over a gig of regular internal space, which corresponds to about a thousand illustrated books, or about five thousand just text. It'd be difficult to read that much without ever being near a cell tower or computer. You certainly couldn't make it between charges.

      But yeah, somehow the card slot is a selling point.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    7. Re:EBOOK PRICES by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Thats the biggest issue I have with ebook readers. The price of the ebooks. I get a less usable book (can't really share it) for the same price as a real book. And a real book has more overhead to cover.

      I never really got this thing about "sharing books" being so important that it would choose your format for you. There is something about a physical object intuitively being worth more, but I have to say one of my favorite things about the kindle is the books you buy are stored remotely as well as on your device, so unless Amazon goes out of business (unlikely) you have the book forever. I can't keep track of how many books I've lost, read until they disintegrated, etc. The kindle book is always there.

    8. Re:EBOOK PRICES by Eponymous+Coward · · Score: 1

      The prices are high, but I would be willing to pay it. My problem is the overbearing DRM. Do you really think all of these ereaders are going to survive? No way. None will be around forever. One day, you will lose all the books you have bought. I can't accept that eventuality with books.

    9. Re:EBOOK PRICES by JanneM · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "While I totally share the view that Ebooks are much less worth to the buyer (me) than "real" books, they're hardly cheaper to produce than paper books. "

      I don't doubt you for a second.

      But as a customer the reality is still that the ebook gives me a lot less value than the printed version. There is a solution, however. The marginal cost of distributing the ebook is just about zero once you've created it. So sell them as a bundle. Add, oh, 10% to the price of the paper book, and give me access to the ebook version as well.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    10. Re:EBOOK PRICES by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry to see you got modded down instead of an intelligent rebuttal that could potentially offset what you've said.

      Slashdot isn't about intelligence and the exchange of ideas anymore, friend. It's a worthless cause anymore.

    11. Re:EBOOK PRICES by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      Ebooks are generally cheaper than dead tree, but I would buy them even if they were more expensive. The convenience of having an entire library available to you anywhere is simply amazing. The ability to get a new book without getting out of bed is valuable in itself.

      The Kindle just brings a better overall experience, therefore it is "worth" more.

      That said, I do expect competition to eventually bring the price of these books down to something significantly below print costs (rather than slightly below print costs). But in the meantime, I will keep buying books on my Kindle (also reading them on my iPhone and PC when the Kindle isn't at hand).

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    12. Re:EBOOK PRICES by vanyel · · Score: 1

      There are plenty of good, reasonably priced and even drm free ebooks. Price of books is no reason not to get one.

    13. Re:EBOOK PRICES by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      Thats the biggest issue I have with ebook readers. The price of the ebooks. I get a less usable book (can't really share it) for the same price as a real book.

      Actually, you can "really share" the DRM-laden ebooks sold by B&N, since they have a lending feature which will transfer your copy to someone else for a set period of time and then return it to you. And, of course, you can really share DRM-free ebooks.

      Additionally, ebooks (both DRM-laden from bookstores like B&N/Amazon, and DRM-free from independent sellers which can still be read on Nook or Kindle) are generally substantially less expensive than physical books, the only time they are even close to the same price is usually when you compare ebooks to mass-market paperbacks, which aren't available for many of the titles available as ebooks. And there are lots of completely-free ebooks.

      Also, some people probably consider being able to carry as many books as you are likely to ever have in your library with you wherever you go without substantial space or weight as making ebooks more -- not less -- usable than paper books.

    14. Re:EBOOK PRICES by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, I bought a *hardback* version of a recent book from Amazon for the same price as the kindle version. (Shipping was "free" as a Prime member.)

      Although I do prefer the physical book over kindle for some books, it also just feels wrong for the kindle version to not be *way* cheaper than paper.

    15. Re:EBOOK PRICES by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      The prices are high, but I would be willing to pay it. My problem is the overbearing DRM. Do you really think all of these ereaders are going to survive? No way. None will be around forever. One day, you will lose all the books you have bought.

      That's certainly a reason to be concerned about purchases from the ebook stores run by B&N and Amazon, but both the Nook and the Kindle will read DRM-free documents in their supported formats, and there are plenty of sources for DRM-free ebooks.

      Taking advantage of the hardware price war doesn't commit you to buying content from the store run by the hardware vendor. And, heck, if the hardware sells and people prefer to buy from DRM-free third party sources and not from the DRM-laden bookstores supplied by the hardware vendors, it will put pressure on the reader vendors to make DRM-free content available directly from their stores.

    16. Re:EBOOK PRICES by Firethorn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Being a somewhat obsessive buyer of books on webscription, one of my irks with my nook is that it doesn't have a search function - which when you load up 300+ ebooks is kinda important.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    17. Re:EBOOK PRICES by Totenglocke · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I won't do so aggressively until prices are reasonable (at $5, I'd go nuts, and their profits would skyrocket; everybody wins.

      $5 isn't bad, but given the fact that their manufacturing and distribution costs are essentially $0, I would never buy many ebooks until the price hit $3 or less.....but that's just my opinion. With prices at $5 I'd rather just spend the extra couple bucks and have something physical that I own. As it is with the average price being over $8, it's cheaper to buy paperback books, and that's before you factor in the cost of the device.

      I'd love to have an e-book reader, but I'm not buying one until the price (for both the books and the reader) are reasonable. $150 is reasonable for the reader, now they just need to fix the pricing on their books.

      --
      "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." ~Thomas Jefferson
    18. Re:EBOOK PRICES by Totenglocke · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have to say one of my favorite things about the kindle is the books you buy are stored remotely as well as on your device, so unless Amazon goes out of business (unlikely) you have the book forever. I can't keep track of how many books I've lost, read until they disintegrated, etc. The kindle book is always there.

      I'm guessing you weren't reading slashdot back when they had the scandal of removing copies of 1984 that people had purchased....

      What you see as the biggest upside, most of us see as one of it's biggest downsides.

      --
      "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." ~Thomas Jefferson
    19. Re:EBOOK PRICES by nick357 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think the eBook people are totally missing the ball on what business model to choose. I'd buy one if they used a rental system rather than a purchase system. It makes no sense to me to buy a book on a reader. I loose too much "book" functionality. But if I could rent one for a dollar a day - sign me up - I'd be spending $365 a year on books. DRM the hell out of it - I don't care: I'm just renting it. I don't want to keep it on my shelf. I don't want to lend it to anyone. I just want to read the thing. If its a "keeper", then I'll go out and buy a dead-tree edition.

      Find the right business model and eBooks will work. They haven't found it yet...

    20. Re:EBOOK PRICES by Cylix · · Score: 2, Funny

      Forget the prices on eBooks as a blocking factor.

      Until they drop the prices on eInk cartridges I'm steering clear of those devices. Who cares if they are a bit cheaper when it will cost probably half the price to get a refill.

      Is eInk made of gold? I think not!

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    21. Re:EBOOK PRICES by afidel · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Amazon DRM is easily stripped.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    22. Re:EBOOK PRICES by Silver+Surfer+1 · · Score: 1

      The problem is that a hard cover book might only cost 10% of the total cost of the book.

      Seeing as people think it is the other way around I dont see a change in attitude from either the publishers nor consumers.

      An e-reader and an e-book are not for everyone. The target market is people who read a book in a week or more. To keep costs down I have visited the classics (free) and now with

      Adobe epub standard set for DRM I check e-books out from the library.

    23. Re:EBOOK PRICES by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I would never buy many ebooks until the price hit $3 or less

      For novels I agree, but I think some technical books are worth more than that. The Art of Electronics is my favourite example. £40 is quite a lot for one book but it's usefulness and the support it gives the authors (hopefully leading to the third edition some day) is IMHO just about acceptable. Just.

      Unfortunately technical books don't work well with eInk displays. You need to flick through them quickly, scanning for the information you need. A 2 second delay showing each page doesn't cut it.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    24. Re:EBOOK PRICES by slyrat · · Score: 1

      Well then you may want to check out fictionwise
      It is a fiction ebook store that has electronic versions of books that will work in almost any of the ebooks out there. Though admittedly the easiest for this might be the sony ones since they strangely have the most open stance on book formats of the big 3 ebooks. They have a whole section on what versions work for the various ebook devices.

    25. Re:EBOOK PRICES by Bigbutt · · Score: 1

      And this is my answer too. I will not be buying new eBooks for any of my readers (I have an iPad and iPhone). When I go into a Brick and Mortar, I browse the available books. Coloring, the picture, the back text, even the feel tells me whether I want to spend the $10 or so for the book. With a physical book, I'll take a chance because if nothing else, I can go to the used book store and trade it in on credit or a handful of other books. I won't experiment with eBooks because if I don't like it, well tough. So I'll be a lot more cautious.

      There are authors that I'll get every book on so eBooks is a good choice for personally established authors. Same with my older books. I've been getting the eBook equivalent of the older books I have. Tolkien, McCaffery, Zimmer-Bradley, Farmer, and whichever others I really like and continue to read over and over.

      I'd gladly pay $15 a month (like Netflix) to read books. Three eBooks checked out at a time (or five or ten). An option to buy (for a discount; it is used :D ) or just check it back in.

      Maybe the public library will provide the same sort of service. I know our local library has an app that lets us check out the eBooks they have.

      [John]

      --
      Shit better not happen!
    26. Re:EBOOK PRICES by rhsanborn · · Score: 1

      Except the pricing for actually printing books is awfully low, almost negligible. I believe it's less than 3 dollars for a standard hardback, and much less for paperbacks. So the main cost of physical books is in royalties to the author, publishing house costs (editing, marketing, etc), and then distribution and retailing. See the following: http://futurismic.com/2009/10/02/ebooks-cost-a-lot-of-money-to-make-will-no-one-explain-why-that-has-to-be-so/ .

      eBooks actually make matters worse right now, because with each format, there is a new round of editing that needs to go on. There are many cases where the ebook costs the publisher significantly more for far less return. That said, there are some wonderful publishers doing good things with eBooks right now. OReilly and Pragmatic bookshelf are putting out good technical books in DRM free form for good prices. New, many of the ebooks are almost half the cost of the dead tree versions. It's these books that I find most useful. I travel, and it's very convenient to carry 3 technical books on my eReader and also have them search-able and accessible on my laptop than it is to carry 3 500+ page books.

    27. Re:EBOOK PRICES by hey! · · Score: 1

      That's not how economics works.

      Let's say it costs you ten dollars to make a widget, including paying yourself. The marginal value of the next widget to your customer base is $9.99. You can't sell another widget. Now you have a competitor who can build an equivalent widget for $5.00. Is he going to sell the next widget he makes for $5.00? Of course not. There's a customer out there who values that widget at $9.99 and is willing to pay that, so he sells his widget at that price and pockets the $4.99 as profit.

      This is the motivation for nearly all investment in technology development: to be able to produce something for less but sell it at the same price you would if it were more costly.

      The way pricing works is that buyers have no reason to care about how much it costs the producer to make a widget, because the producer is going to price his widget at market rates. The producer, on the other hand, doesn't really have any reason to worry about how much a consumer would be willing to pay for a specific widget in a different market. The current market has priced that widget and that's his target. Producers elaborate their products in hopes of snagging customers who want some feature the other widgets don't have, but at some point consumers give up and say, "it's just a widget".

      So as a producer you have an optimization problem: how do I price my goods to maximize my returns? In this case, you have more than one place to set prices (the device and the content), but that only means it becomes a more complicated optimization problem. No matter what you do, some customers will walk away from your offer and choose your competitor. The opposite is true too: your customers walked away from the exact deal other potential customers chose. That's economic life.

      If somebody can make money selling ebooks for less money and charging more for the device, good for them. The reason it doesn't happen is that the content owners want higher margins on ebooks than they get on paper books. Why? Because they can. If the ebook store can sell a book for $9.99 and it only costs $5.00 to produce, why should the ebook store pocket the extra $4.99 of profit and not the content owner? Also the content owner really doesn't want to see their product selling so cheap in the ebook medium becuase they're still dependent on paper sales. Consumers aren't perfectly rational, after all. They might be willing to pay $20 for a hardbound book, but not if the book is available as an ebook for $5.00, even though the customer in question doesn't have an ebook reader. That's because the customer values the content, and if he realizes the content is actually less than $5.00 of the cost of the book he might change his valuation. That's irrational, but it's also economic life.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    28. Re:EBOOK PRICES by EggyToast · · Score: 1

      It's always there, and takes up no space, but sharing is an important factor in buying a book for many people. I just had a friend ask me for some suggested reading, and a couple of the books were e-books with DRM. If it was a paper book, I could've loaned it to him.

      It's not terrible, but it's an example of how DRM is more of a nuisance for those being "good consumers" than any actual protection for copyright holders. Instead, my friend just got the books from the library.

    29. Re:EBOOK PRICES by EggyToast · · Score: 1

      Even if DRM protection is not easy to remove, I find it hard to believe that if one of these companies suddenly went bankrupt, their assets wouldn't be purchased by a competitor. What's more, if they suddenly disappeared overnight, then there would be no one to update their DRM format -- giving hackers a stable target. Arguably, once the company disappears it would be easier to bypass their DRM, as there'd be no legal team to send out C&D letters to hackers.

    30. Re:EBOOK PRICES by EggyToast · · Score: 1

      I rent books from the library. Some even offer e-books. I get to read the books and then give it back after a few weeks; it's great! You should see if one's been set up in your area!

    31. Re:EBOOK PRICES by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      I've put a lot of free books on my Nook. Project Gutenberg now has ePub format available, and B&N provides a vast number of public domain books Google scanned (the conversion isn't great but it's usually readable). I haven't paid over $2.00 for an eBook, and, frankly, I'm not likely to. I don't consider an eBook to be nearly as generally useful as the paper variety.

      Since B&N advertised over a million free books, they must be attempting to lure in people like me. They're never going to get the cost of a Nook out of me in books, so they'll have to be happy with the money I gave them for the reader. You can't give away a razor when people can just download blades.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    32. Re:EBOOK PRICES by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      But if you are smart, ebook readers can be a good deal. There are a ton of free (and legal) ebooks out there.

      I'm definitely counting on this, particularly the SF sites you cited. I've heard at least some of the ebook readers support checkouts from the library (downloaded at home; no need to actually go there), which goes a long way to boost the value of the reader--free books and a saved trip, what's not to like

      The free books give me a lot of incentive to try new things. If I don't like it, hey, just dump it and move on to the next. I don't have to worry that I'll get my money's worth. But of course if I find a new author I like I'll be buying many of their books, so they win, too.

      I'd been trying to hold out for the $99 price point, but $149 may be close enough that I'm sold.

    33. Re:EBOOK PRICES by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I noticed that B&N claims to have access to over 500,000 free ebooks that you can download. After taking a brief look through this free library there were quite a few books that I would like to read, so I may go for the Wi-Fi only Nook. I have to agree, ebook prices over $5 are ridiculous and I am unlikely to purchase many at any price above that.

    34. Re:EBOOK PRICES by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Except that they refunded the money and you could then go out and buy it from the proper source?

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    35. Re:EBOOK PRICES by stanlyb · · Score: 1

      Thumbs Up. This is what i recently started to realize how the BOOK business really works. And yes, the e-books are still too overpriced. They have to be under $10. Period. Oh, and one more thing, the copyright period, when it becomes lets say 10years (or even 5 years? anyone?), then and only then we all will be free of all the behemoths and dinosaurs, and no one in his mind would ever think of stealing or ripping off the DRM.

    36. Re:EBOOK PRICES by Totenglocke · · Score: 1

      That's not the point. The point is that they proved that they can (and will) remove books that you own at any time and for any reason they feel like.

      That is why you never let someone else have control over your property.

      --
      "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." ~Thomas Jefferson
    37. Re:EBOOK PRICES by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      So then I guess you'll never use a cable box(including cablecard devices), DVDs, or Blu-Rays?

    38. Re:EBOOK PRICES by Totenglocke · · Score: 1

      Please, enlighten me as to how the MPAA can revoke my ability to use the dvd's that I own.

      --
      "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." ~Thomas Jefferson
    39. Re:EBOOK PRICES by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      Well, future Blu-rays will have the ability to turn off the analog outputs for the Blu-ray players.

      I was just being nitpicky about the fact that you don't legally own the DVD's content, and that they are just as DRM-encumbered as eBooks.

    40. Re:EBOOK PRICES by Jenny+Home · · Score: 1

      I have never bought any ebooks yet.

    41. Re:EBOOK PRICES by JimFive · · Score: 1

      until prices are reasonable (at $5, I'd go nuts,

      What I'd like to see is $10 for a combo paperback, ebook edition. I'd also like to see some sort of deal where if I currently own a book I can get the e-book at a very reduced price (~$1).
      --
      JimFive

      --
      Please stop using the word theory when you mean hypothesis.
    42. Re:EBOOK PRICES by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Didn't they apologize and promise not to do it again as well?

  3. Neglect the benefits & tablets win... by Coopjust · · Score: 5, Insightful
    When you neglect the benefits of dedicated eReader devices with e-ink, such as...
    • The fact that they get battery life in weeks instead of hours
    • The fact that they use minimal power between page flips (vs. a relatively steady draw)
    • The fact that they are easier on the eyes
    • The fact that they are more easily read in sunlight...

    It's a lot easier to say that it's over and the iPad/tablet rush will kill the eReader revolution.

    Not to mention the fact that the nook/Kindle are much, much cheaper. That makes taking it to places like the beach (large zipper plastic bag keeps it safe and readable) or just on the go in general is something you don't have to worry about.

    Yes, the iPad will have its fans. But there are people who don't want a "do everything" device, they want something that reads books really, really well. And the nook, Kindle, and other eReaders do that. Until there's a radical revolution in color screen technology that gains the benefits that e-ink has (which are great for a book reading device)

    Not to mention that the 3G iPad is $130 extra, and doesn't include free 3G for the store so you can make an impulse book buy wherever you are. That's major in the convenience factor of the device.

    1. Re:Neglect the benefits & tablets win... by Gertlex · · Score: 4, Interesting

      iPad meh... I've been reading books like a fiend over the past year with my iPod touch. It's readable outside without a problem (with sunglasses), it's small so my puny nerd arms don't get tired, fits in a pocket, supports Kindle software, as well as numerous others (I recommend Stanza - vertical swipe -> brightness adjustment).

      Battery life of maybe a day without charging, but I can live with that.

    2. Re:Neglect the benefits & tablets win... by Coopjust · · Score: 1

      I have an 8GB iPod Touch that's under a year old and I get maybe two hours of continuous use browsing the web indoors (where the backlight doesn't have to be full blast to be somewhat readable) and I get a couple hours of usage tops.

      I know, anecdotal, etc...but at the price of these devices, they're great for people that read more than a book every once in a while.

    3. Re:Neglect the benefits & tablets win... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      When making a comparison, how can you ignore the ONLY benefits of the e-reader (e-ink, battery life, and the free data on some models)? Tablets win for the same thing that all superior products win: for anyone looking for MORE than a decent platform for reading text, e-readers suck. If that's all you want to do, that's great, enjoy your e-reader. The price cuts certainly help. The problem is that there are *so many* disadvantages to an e-reader that you're neglecting, along with a complementary list of advantages for tablets.

      Of your four "advantages", two are restatements of each other (battery life is a function of power draw) and one is highly subjective at best ("easier on the eyes"). The fact is that e-ink isn't realistically any easier on the eyes unless you're comparing e-ink in a fully lit room with an LCD on full brightness in a totally dark room. One could even argue that your fourth reason is also subjective: the sparkly/glittery effect of the e-ink screen and the relative low contrast between the green background and the charcoal text has been known to annoy people, too.

      Then there are the disadvantages: page flips are slow and clumsy, artwork is terrible unless it's line art, there's no color (and the color e-ink prototypes aren't going to cut it, either), there's essentially no interaction other than scrolling, it has limited/no multimedia capabilities, and it is, in the words of Alton Brown, a unitasker of the first degree.

      Compare a tablet, with a full range of information, Internet, multimedia, gaming, productivity, communication, and reading applications. Tablets done right have screens with good color, viewing angles, and contrast, and highly responsive multitouch interfaces. Battery life north of 10 hours is enough so as to make no difference to most people--they can use it all day, drop it into a charger at night, and use it all day again. The reading applications aren't limited to text, but fully-featured magazines, comic books, illustrated texts, and interactive content, all of which can be used without an external light source with a simple adjustment of background brightness.

      People who complain about "headaches" when using an LCD are just doing so in an environment with insufficient ambient light, which e-readers only avoid because they're illegible without sufficient ambient light. Whining about staring into a "lightbulb" is only based on poor ergonomic choices that they've made themselves. There is no physical difference to the eye whether light is backlit or reflected; turn on a lamp and/or adjust your brightness in low-light conditions and your problems are magically solved.

      That said, personal preference is personal preference. If e-ink is the fairy dust cure-all, then it counts against tablets. Does it count enough to give up all the other functionality? That depends on what you're buying it for. But there's little question that more people will find a tablet useful and worthwhile than an e-reader, even at three times the price.

    4. Re:Neglect the benefits & tablets win... by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      Your battery is faulty.

    5. Re:Neglect the benefits & tablets win... by spinkham · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I actually own both a Kindle (DX) and an IPod Touch, and can testify that the Kindle is much more eye friendly. Having both is awesome, because my iPod is always in my pocket for quick reading, my Kindle is much more eye and battery friendly for serious reading, and the software keeps both in sync. Well, when I buy kindle books anyway, with other DRM free ebooks that make up most of my collection I have to keep in sync myself, but it's not that hard.

      And yes, the iPod touch is barely readable outside in the bright sunlight, but the Kindle is gorgeous, and only gets better the more light falls on it.Even indoors, the kindle is much easier to read.
      .
      Bottom line: Don't knock the benefits of e-ink until you've used an e-ink device for a few days.

      --
      Blessed are the pessimists, for they have made backups.
    6. Re:Neglect the benefits & tablets win... by Coopjust · · Score: 1

      When making a comparison, how can you ignore the ONLY benefits of the e-reader (e-ink, battery life, and the free data on some models)? Tablets win for the same thing that all superior products win: for anyone looking for MORE than a decent platform for reading text, e-readers suck. If that's all you want to do, that's great, enjoy your e-reader. The price cuts certainly help. The problem is that there are *so many* disadvantages to an e-reader that you're neglecting, along with a complementary list of advantages for tablets.

      A tablet does many things well. The eReader is cheaper and does one thing well. As I said, the iPad will have its fans, but there will be people who want a single purpose device.

      Of your four "advantages", two are restatements of each other (battery life is a function of power draw) and one is highly subjective at best ("easier on the eyes").

      Not the same point. When you are sitting reading a page on the iPad, you are using just as much battery life as when you flip the page. Whereas you can leave an e-Ink page up for several minutes and the draw will be very minimal. e-ink uses big amounts of power to change the state, but keeping the text on screen takes virtually no battery power.

      As for the allegedly subjective claim..., you are right, there is debate. Based on personal experience, that is my opinion.

      Then there are the disadvantages: page flips are slow and clumsy, artwork is terrible unless it's line art, there's no color (and the color e-ink prototypes aren't going to cut it, either), there's essentially no interaction other than scrolling, it has limited/no multimedia capabilities, and it is, in the words of Alton Brown, a unitasker of the first degree.

      As I said. Some will want everything and the kitchen sink, and others will want a good book reading device.

      Compare a tablet, with a full range of information, Internet, multimedia, gaming, productivity, communication, and reading applications. Tablets done right have screens with good color, viewing angles, and contrast, and highly responsive multitouch interfaces. Battery life north of 10 hours is enough so as to make no difference to most people--they can use it all day, drop it into a charger at night, and use it all day again. The reading applications aren't limited to text, but fully-featured magazines, comic books, illustrated texts, and interactive content, all of which can be used without an external light source with a simple adjustment of background brightness.

      Which appeals to some people and not others. A lot of people would enjoy the benefits. If I had infinite resources, I'd get some very nice (and expensive) technology, and my computer would have top of the line components.

      People who complain about "headaches" when using an LCD are just doing so in an environment with insufficient ambient light, which e-readers only avoid because they're illegible without sufficient ambient light. Whining about staring into a "lightbulb" is only based on poor ergonomic choices that they've made themselves. There is no physical difference to the eye whether light is backlit or reflected; turn on a lamp and/or adjust your brightness in low-light conditions and your problems are magically solved.

      True, to some degree. I would still prefer to read E-ink for hours over a regular display, even with a large amount of ambient light (either from bulbs or natural).

      That said, personal preference is personal preference. If e-ink is the fairy dust cure-all, then it counts against tablets. Does it count enough to give up all the other functionality? That depends on what you're buying it for. But there's little question that

    7. Re:Neglect the benefits & tablets win... by RMingin · · Score: 1

      Counter-anecdote:

      I had a Kindle 1, have a Kindle 2i, have an iPod Touch, and have an iPad.

      My house is apparently less naturally lit than yours, the backlight on my iPad is worth much more than the eInk's readability.

      I further suggest color, which I hadn't realized how much I was missing, and the ability to CHANGE THE GORRAMN FONT.

      Both the Kindle iPad app and the native iBooks reader allow font changes. Amazon clearly realizes it's wanted, so why one font only on Kindle?

      Also, while the iPad loses badly to Kindle in direct sunlight, it wipes the floor with eInk while reading in bed. Now I can crank my brightness to the bottom notch, turn out all other lights, and read a softly glowing book. My wife with the K2i needs the bedstand light on, or has to try and perch an LED light just so.

      While the debate of 'BETTER IN SUNLIGHT' versus 'BACKLIT!!' will go on forever due to personal tastes and eye ability, I leave you with this parting (cheap) shot: Comic books. Yeah. Rocks.

      --
      The preceding comment is my own, and in no way construes an opinon of the Emperor of Mankind.
    8. Re:Neglect the benefits & tablets win... by nine-times · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I have an iPad, and though I like it pretty well, I have to say that I don't like it for reading books. Part of the reason is the display. It's strange because I'm completely comfortable using it to read long web page articles, but reading a novel on a lit screen rubs me the wrong way.

      I have another complaint, though, which is arguable a stupid complaint but it's much harder to solve: I'm too easily distracted. If I'm trying to read a novel and I have a device in my hand that can browse the web, I might just go to one of my favorite websites for a minute or two to see what's going on. If my iPad beeps because I received an email, then I will immediately stop reading to see what email I just received. In short, when I tried reading a novel on my iPad, I couldn't get any reading done.

      Now in both of these complaints, there's not really an inherent problem with the iPad. It just doesn't quite work for me. Still, I doubt I'm the only one who would have these complaints. Personally I've gone back to dead-tree distribution for my novels. I might consider a dedicated e-reader if it was cheap enough, and if I weren't concerned about the DRM.

    9. Re:Neglect the benefits & tablets win... by Stray7Xi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I used to get frustrated when I'd come to tech sites and people are claiming the iPad has the better screen because it's color...

      Then I put it in perspective. We're on a tech site dedicated to computer geeks. For the most part they're not looking to read, they're looking to browse the web. When you look at book enthusiast blogs, eInk readers are still highly preferred. The kindle and the like are for hobbiest readers, and serious readers aren't going to put up with an LCD screen. I don't think price is even the biggest issue, hobbies are almost always expensive, but comfort wins. I'm curious what a slashdot poll would show for how much readers spent on their keyboard/mouse.

      If you read a few books a year, then you don't need an ereader. If you read a few books a month, you'll want eInk reader, maybe even if it's in addition to the iPad you use for other functions. Borrow one from a friend and try reading on both for a couple hours.

    10. Re:Neglect the benefits & tablets win... by joh · · Score: 1

      I have an 8GB iPod Touch that's under a year old and I get maybe two hours of continuous use browsing the web indoors (where the backlight doesn't have to be full blast to be somewhat readable) and I get a couple hours of usage tops.

      You should run the battery completely down (wait until the thing shuts down, start it up again, rinse, repeat) at least once a month. If you don't do this the power management has no idea about the charge the battery can actually hold and will shut down much too early.

      Either that or your battery is junk. I have an 8GB iPod touch (first generation) that is nearly three years old now and still runs about 4 hours or more. I use it every day and I've read about 300 books on it now.

    11. Re:Neglect the benefits & tablets win... by thrawn_aj · · Score: 1

      Same here (Palm Centro - for over 2 years now). And I read at ~50% brightness in normal daylight (70-80% if it's really bright out). I still got the Nook recently, not so much for the sunlight reading but for the paper-like experience. I read a LOT more now, especially before bedtime (didn't realize how much the LCD screen was contributing to lower sustained reading time).

    12. Re:Neglect the benefits & tablets win... by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      You should run the battery completely down (wait until the thing shuts down, start it up again, rinse, repeat) at least once a month. If you don't do this the power management has no idea about the charge the battery can actually hold and will shut down much too early.

      Interesting theory, but you're better off not doing that and just putting up with an inaccurate battery meter. The deeper you cycle, the faster you consume the battery, and it's not linear. I'd expect advice like this from someone who makes a living selling batteries....

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    13. Re:Neglect the benefits & tablets win... by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      What part of "they're not really the same market, although there is some overlap" do people not seem to understand???

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    14. Re:Neglect the benefits & tablets win... by thrawn_aj · · Score: 1

      Yep. I like having copies of books on both my phone and my Nook. The biggest use - grocery store line. Since I'm not a woman (with the benefit of a purse), carrying around my Nook for that purpose is not feasible. Something that fits in my pocket is great for the many such short annoying periods of time that no longer go to waste. Buying in a Palm Zire 6 years ago and the Centro 2 years ago were the best investments I've ever made (in terms of cost-benefit ratio).

    15. Re:Neglect the benefits & tablets win... by thrawn_aj · · Score: 1

      But there's little question that more people will find a tablet useful and worthwhile than an e-reader, even at three times the price.

      The biggest point in the e-reader's favor is that the tablet (as it exists today) is a replacement for devices I already have. Also, a finger is a poor substitute for a mouse for someone who actually wants to work on the damn thing. I'll agree that a tablet is a much better fun toy that any other multimedia toys out there.

    16. Re:Neglect the benefits & tablets win... by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      I think the battery life of an iPad is just fine. I charged it exactly a week ago and I still have 65% battery life left. I've used it for a few hours here and there and have not turned it off. There's a point when longer battery life further doesn't really add anything, it's not really a terrible inconvenience to charge a device every few days while sleeping.

      Reading in the sunlight is supposed to be a selling point, but I've never read paper books in direct sunlight. I don't know why I'd read a Kindle in direct sunlight if I've never read a book in sunlight. eink screens really don't have much contrast (the maker's own specs say 6:1, LCDs easily get hundreds:1 without "dynamic contrast" trickery) and I find the eink page flip blink to be annoying.

    17. Re:Neglect the benefits & tablets win... by mjwx · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yes, the iPad will have its fans. But there are people who don't want a "do everything" device,

      That's a bit redundant, you already said the Ipad will have fans.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    18. Re:Neglect the benefits & tablets win... by Ultimate+Heretic · · Score: 1

      I will keep saying this until I get tired of not seeing a reader that fits my needs: large, letter format that can show entire pages of scientific papers in PDF format. Preferably with a method for note taking. Not a laptop, lightweight and bullet proof, or at least lasagne proof. None of these fit (no, iPad is too small to show entire pages that can be read) as I don't want to spend my time zooming in and out; this makes reading a chore. In the meanwhile, I can buy a hell of a lot of toner for my printer for $499 and print all my PDF papers, sit in a comfortable chair and not give a d*mn if I get my dinner all over them. Match that and I will be first in line with my Ben Franklin's in hand! On the other hand, a very inexpensive, small form reader for novels is appealing. Don't forget manufacturers, your users will age too and need larger typefaces to read as they march toward their rendezvous with the worms.

    19. Re:Neglect the benefits & tablets win... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      I actually own both a Kindle (DX) and an IPod Touch, and can testify that the Kindle is much more eye friendly. Having both is awesome, because my iPod is always in my pocket for quick reading, my Kindle is much more eye and battery friendly for serious reading

      Seconded, only in my case it's Sony PRS-505, and Nexus One with Aldiko. I've only read from the former for a long time, but after buying N1 a few months ago, I found that always having it in the pocket is convenient for reading on the road and such. If I know in advance that I'll have to wait somewhere for a while, though, I'll definitely grab the PRS. It's also the one used almost exclusively at home, combined with a comfy couch and a well-positioned lamp with incandescent lightbulb (short of scattered sunlight, you can't beat those things at lighting that strains the eye least).

    20. Re:Neglect the benefits & tablets win... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      the sparkly/glittery effect of the e-ink screen and the relative low contrast between the green background and the charcoal text

      "Glittery effect"? Green background?? What "e-ink" reader are you smoking... er... I mean, using?

    21. Re:Neglect the benefits & tablets win... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Kindle has a distinctive green tint to its substrate, visible more in sunlight. It's visible here to a lesser extent: http://images.ask-leo.com/kindle_askleo_full.jpg and here: http://gravitationalpull.net/wp/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/kindx.jpg

      As to glittery effect, the finish on the screen sparkles or shimmers under light. If you've used one and are sensitive to such things, you know exactly what I'm talking about. Like the rainbow effect of a DLP, some are bothered more by it than others.

    22. Re:Neglect the benefits & tablets win... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      I've seen Kindle, but don't own it, and didn't use it for any extended period of time.

      That said, I own 2 other (different) eInk readers, and know people who own yet another different one. Neither has greenish background, and neither sparkles under light (there is some glare under direct light, but even a slight angle takes care of that).

    23. Re:Neglect the benefits & tablets win... by Space+cowboy · · Score: 1

      I have 47 books on my iPad, I am what you would call an avid reader, and for me the iPad won hands down over a Kindle that I borrowed for a couple of weeks before buying the iPad. For me at least, this idea that e-ink is easier on the eyes is just so much snake-oil.

      Simon.

      --
      Physicists get Hadrons!
    24. Re:Neglect the benefits & tablets win... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Comic books? on 1024x768?!

      Manga, yes, marginally (150 dpi). American comics? Not really. 100dpi scans will often have legibility issues; starting from higher-res scans and scaling to 100dpi will fix that, but you lose a lot of detail.

      IMO, 1280x800 is the absolute minimum for comics, and (if I could find it in a portable device) 1920x1200 would be the right answer.

    25. Re:Neglect the benefits & tablets win... by LRAD · · Score: 1

      Transflective LCD's look pretty promising, they can turn off their backlights and be readable in bright light. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transflective_liquid_crystal_display Pretty cool video of one in action. http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/cpt-starts-a-little-transflective-lcd-fire-under-pixel-qi/

    26. Re:Neglect the benefits & tablets win... by Gerzel · · Score: 1

      Indeed these are all good reasons why the E-book readers are competitive, for now.

      The thing is the nook and kindle are almost certainly transition technologies. They fill a niche that will be taken up by more capable devices. Sure they'll probably always be some around in specialized roles (people still use pagers, which are a good example of transitional technology).

      There are already several functions that can fairly easily be built into an E-book reader, such as mp3 player, web-browser, and soon E-ink color screen. An Ipad isn't far from a beefed up E-Book reader w/o the E-ink or similar display.

      The important technology take-away of these things is their E-ink and similar display technologies, and the lessons learned with the new interface requirements.

    27. Re:Neglect the benefits & tablets win... by ShakaUVM · · Score: 3, Informative

      >>Not to mention that the 3G iPad is $130 extra, and doesn't include free 3G for the store so you can make an impulse book buy wherever you are. That's major in the convenience factor of the device.

      Yeah, exactly. Paying for 3G is a huge issue - it's like adding $360/year to the cost of an iPad. B&N also offers 20% the purchase of a Nook, which is nice. They were offering it for $259-($50 free gift certificate)=$209 up through yesterday, so I guess the price reduction to $199 makes sense.

      To contrast the two:
      Nook 3G: $199, 3G+Wifi (no monthly), 2G+MicroSD storage, digital ink + color touchscreen, Android (easily rootable)
      iPad 3G: $629, 3G+Wifi (used to be $30/mo unlimited, now $25/mo for 2G), 16G non-expandable storage, nice color touchscreen, iPhone OS, much better at surfing the web, sending email, and looking at photos.

      Without a doubt, if all I wanted was an ebook reader, I'd get a Nook. If I wanted a general purpose portable device to surf the web and send email... well, I wouldn't buy an iPad. I'd just keep using my Android smartphone. I have no desire to drop that kind of cash for an iPad.

    28. Re:Neglect the benefits & tablets win... by lucas+teh+geek · · Score: 1

      assuming youre not trolling, take it into an apple store and get it replaced. if it's under a year old it's still under warranty, and that's definitely not normal battery life

      --
      TIAEAE!
    29. Re:Neglect the benefits & tablets win... by tftp · · Score: 1

      Reading in the sunlight is supposed to be a selling point, but I've never read paper books in direct sunlight.

      I don't do it either. First of all, full sunlight is way too bright. Second, if you are outdoors then probably there are better things to do than reading a book, and there are distractions too. Reading is done best at home, alone, in a quiet setting. For most people it's an hour before falling asleep - because they don't have other time for that, and because they can expect to not be disturbed by phone calls, email, work, family, etc.

      This is posted from Samsung Q1 UMPC (a tablet.) I use it to read books, read /. and listen to music (it has stereo BT; speakers are present, but their frequency range is lacking.) The backlight is set to minimum, and it works just fine in a dark room. I hate eInk for its low contrast and for its flickering.

    30. Re:Neglect the benefits & tablets win... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Yes, the iPad will have its fans. But there are people who don't want a "do everything" device"

      Besides, if I wanted a do everything device, I'd get a Netbook or Laptop, because unlike the iPad, it can, you know, do everything- like let me write code in a proper IDE or play some classic PC games for starters.

    31. Re:Neglect the benefits & tablets win... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > When you neglect the benefits of dedicated eReader devices

      I am sure it is fine in America, but in Ireland the publishing companies are what is killing ereader devices. I bought one six months ago and after under 2 months ended up giving it away to my mother. Why?

      Because it was almost impossible to buy any books for the device. Books are region locked and Ireland you well over the odds for an ebook which is dated vs a normal paperback.

      3G on ebook reader? lol.

    32. Re:Neglect the benefits & tablets win... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Highly recommend restoring it to factory settings first, WITHOUT recovering your backup (you'll know you did it right because you have to reset your settings). 99% of cases of reduced battery life on an iOS device are corrupt software, and the first thing they're going to tell you is to restore it and come back later.

    33. Re:Neglect the benefits & tablets win... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      A good LCD has almost the contrast of e-Ink, which has neither white paper nor black ink. An LED display has even more contrast since it's light-emitting and has a quite good black. So now you have to fall back on resolution, except there's numerous small LCDs with ~200ppi displays, which is not much worse than e-Ink. Oh wait, I guess there's power consumption. *whew* Finally found a use for the stuff. Except you need a book light in dark conditions :p

      I think this is the real reason geeks want color. e-Ink is just not that fantastic, though it clearly has its uses. I've been reading novels on computer screens since I was a kid and I'm still pretty happy with the experience. It's not that I don't want an e-Ink book reader, it's that I don't think they're worth the money. The real dealbreaker is that I can stuff a paperback book in my pocket and not break it, when I can do that with an e-Reader for under a hundred bucks I'll think about dropping the dough. It's not like a better one won't come out in a year; meanwhile I can buy used books to keep costs down (under what it costs to buy the same kind of stuff as eBooks in most cases.)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    34. Re:Neglect the benefits & tablets win... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I might consider a dedicated e-reader if it was cheap enough, and if I weren't concerned about the DRM.

      Is there such a thing? Certainly, neither the Kindle nor the Nook is a "dedicated e-reader"; both have assorted other functionality.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    35. Re:Neglect the benefits & tablets win... by Chaos+Incarnate · · Score: 1

      Is your "four hours" with wifi on or off? GP obviously has it on, which will suck the battery like there's no tomorrow.

      --
      Benford's Corollary to Clarke's Law: "Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced."
    36. Re:Neglect the benefits & tablets win... by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      Indeed - and furthermore, if people are willing to neglect these benefits, then we should ask what's so special about the Ipad? There are numerous more popular, and cheaper, netbooks, tablets, PMPs and so on, that are out there competing with e-readers.

      And remember in the past when there was some article talking about a netbook or tablet being an e-reader competitor? There'd be no end of comments from people pointing out that these things weren't e-readers, due to the lack of e-ink. Yet now, because it's Apple, suddenly it's pretended that these differences don't exist. This is just yet another attempt to force the obligitary Ipad advert, into a story about e-readers where the Ipad is off-topic.

    37. Re:Neglect the benefits & tablets win... by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      Sure, but it's still absurd for the summary and others to act as if the Ipad is now the only device that does any of that. There have been millions of netbooks and other tablets etc selling around for years.

      And the point isn't that people are saying you can only read on an e-reader; the point is that people are claiming that the Ipad is a Kindle replacement, which ignores the point that it doesn't do what the Kindle does. The fact that you don't need the Kindle's features is irrelevant - if people make the claim that the Ipad improves on the Kindle, then we expect to compare it on those features. Just as we used to everytime someone claimed that a netbook or non-Apple tablet was a Kindle replacement. Why is it a different rule for the Ipad?

    38. Re:Neglect the benefits & tablets win... by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      I have another complaint, though, which is arguable a stupid complaint but it's much harder to solve: I'm too easily distracted. If I'm trying to read a novel and I have a device in my hand that can browse the web, I might just go to one of my favorite websites for a minute or two to see what's going on. If my iPad beeps because I received an email, then I will immediately stop reading to see what email I just received. In short, when I tried reading a novel on my iPad, I couldn't get any reading done

      The flip side is, with the iPad, I can set a Calendar reminder to get off my butt because I promised to drive my mom someplace at 3PM. With a "pure" ereader, I'd be engrossed in the book until Mom phoned me at 3:01 asking why I wasn't at her place yet.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    39. Re:Neglect the benefits & tablets win... by Splintax · · Score: 2, Informative

      Neither of those devices has practical functionality beyond reading ebooks. Compared to the iPad they are "dedicated" e-readers.

    40. Re:Neglect the benefits & tablets win... by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      Interesting theory, but you're better off not doing that and just putting up with an inaccurate battery meter. The deeper you cycle, the faster you consume the battery, and it's not linear. I'd expect advice like this from someone who makes a living selling batteries....

      I've heard the opposite from what you're saying. I used to leave my Apple laptop plugged in most of the time, and the battery died within a year. Apple replaced it for free but begged me to change my charging habits to let it charge, unplug it, and let it drain most of the way (they didn't say all the way to zero) before plugging it back in again. The replacement battery has lasted two years and still keeps a good charge, so I'm pretty convinced their recommendation was the correct way to treat the battery.

    41. Re:Neglect the benefits & tablets win... by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      My Nook is a black and white reader. It doesn't do illustrations at all well. I'm seriously limited in my ability to flip around (although I've just been notified of a software update to improve that).

      In other words, it's really good for reading text from front to back, and not nearly as good for other applications.

      It's wonderful for reading novels. It's great for reading fairly nontechnical non-fiction that I intend to read in toto. It's lousy for technical works, since those demand page-flipping and ideally good search functions.

      I suspect that /. readership will be more interested in technical books than most, and the eInk readers are bad for that.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    42. Re:Neglect the benefits & tablets win... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Neither of those devices has practical functionality beyond reading ebooks. Compared to the iPad they are "dedicated" e-readers.

      And compared to a tablet PC running a desktop OS the iPad is a toy chained to Apple, but that doesn't stop a lot of people from getting a lot of use out of its functionality beyond running Apps (which is clearly what Apple wants you to do, given the deficiencies of the web browser.) But the Kindle also has a deficient web browser good enough for many purposes, as does the Nook. Both have an assortment of other cute little apps in them. In fact, with this latest price drop, I'm thinking of buying a Kindle just for the continual 3G and WiFi hotspot access to stuff like Wikipedia. I don't personally see much value to me in purchasing eBooks (although I imagine I will buy some where the DRM can be stripped) but having a Wikipedia terminal? Oh, yeah. Too bad there's so much other stuff on the list to buy first :)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    43. Re:Neglect the benefits & tablets win... by nine-times · · Score: 1

      And compared to a tablet PC running a desktop OS the iPad is a toy chained to Apple

      Wow. Somebody is touchy.

      But the Kindle also has a deficient web browser good enough for many purposes, as does the Nook.

      Here's the difference: I wouldn't buy a Kindle to be able to browse the web, but I wouldn't buy an iPad without the ability to browse the web. Maybe that's just me and my personal preferences, but the Kindle doesn't seem like it'd be a great browsing device, so even if I had one, I probably wouldn't use it for web browsing.

    44. Re:Neglect the benefits & tablets win... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who's talking about the iPad? It's not the first or only tablet on the market. You've got a downright crazy Apple complex, right down to an unwillingness to type the name of their products in a truly impotent display of your insecurity. Do you write M$ or call them MicroShaft, too?

    45. Re:Neglect the benefits & tablets win... by RPoet · · Score: 1

      http://www.collegehumor.com/video:1910868 is a little apropos, perhaps.

      --
      "Oppression and harassment is a small price to pay to live in the land of the free." -- Montgomery Burns.
    46. Re:Neglect the benefits & tablets win... by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Your issue was with over-charging. Many laptop manufactures used to (and probably still do) keep the battery connected to the charging circuitry whenever it's plugged in, constantly trickle-charging it. It saves money on power supplies twofold: by eliminating a costly interrupter circuit, and by using the battery itself as a low-pass filter in to the motherboard.

      Unfortunately, this practice is just as bad, if not worse, than deep-cycling, which is why Apple suggested that you cycle the battery a bit. They're probably wagering that it'll take you at least two years to hit the 500 cycle lithium discharge milestone, whereas over-charging can damage your battery much more quickly. (I used up a toshiba battery in less than two months by leaving it connected. Something which should not have been an issue for a laptop sold in a category called, "desktop replacement.")

      I'd wager that they're incorrect about the full-cycling, though. You have to do it at least once, and once in a while, to program the charging logic, but lithium-ion batteries get more cycle life the shallower you drain them, and they don't like to be stored empty or low. You ought to be fine as long as you don't keep it plugged in on a full charge too much.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    47. Re:Neglect the benefits & tablets win... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's RUMORED to be released in November. After being delayed at least twice now. It "has" nothing at all, because it doesn't exist yet.

    48. Re:Neglect the benefits & tablets win... by jeffb+(2.718) · · Score: 1

      You're still thinking in print terms. 100dpi is certainly coarser than normal visual acuity, but the iPad's gestures make panning and zooming very quick and fluid. When I want to see finer detail (or, more frequently, when I want to click on a small link), I just zoom in.

      I'd certainly love to have a 300dpi display (actually, 200dpi would be fine for my older eyes), but the combination of antialiasing and pan/zoom on the iPad works out very nicely for me. I like what I've seen of e-ink, but I'd really miss that capability, and I think it'll be a while before that level of dynamic refreshing and multitouch interaction is widespread in commercial e-ink devices.

  4. My prediction by AnonymousClown · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Forrester projected that the $150 price point would jump start e-reader sales.

    And I predict a $49.99 will make them take off like a rocket!

    Now if only there was a price war with content.

    I think subtracting the printing and distribution costs of a printed version from a dead tree version of a book would be a fair price for econtent - the publisher makes their money, the author gets the same royalty, and the consumer doesn't feel like their over-paying for content.

    Example: $50 paper book - $20 for royalties, advertising, general administrative costs, publisher profit = $30 for printing, paper, trucking of the dead trees. Sell the book for $20 + retailer markup = $28.

    I can live with that for the same content. Now if they'd allow for that content to be transferred easily ..... yeah, dream on. I guess if someone want's to borrow a book on the eReader, you would have to lend them the entire reader. That sucks!

    --
    RIP America

    July 4, 1776 - September 11, 2001

    1. Re:My prediction by True+Vox · · Score: 1

      I can live with that for the same content. Now if they'd allow for that content to be transferred easily ..... yeah, dream on. I guess if someone want's to borrow a book on the eReader, you would have to lend them the entire reader. That sucks!

      Doesn't the Nook allow you to loan books?

      --
      "Gratuitous complexity is akin to chaos" - True Vox
    2. Re:My prediction by Coopjust · · Score: 1

      LendMe has to be explicitly allowed by the book's publisher, you can only lend it to once for up to 14 days (obviously, you can't read it until your friend "returns" the book or the 14 days elapses).

    3. Re:My prediction by joh · · Score: 1

      Forrester projected that the $150 price point would jump start e-reader sales.

      And I predict a $49.99 will make them take off like a rocket!

      Now if only there was a price war with content.

      I think subtracting the printing and distribution costs of a printed version from a dead tree version of a book would be a fair price for econtent - the publisher makes their money, the author gets the same royalty, and the consumer doesn't feel like their over-paying for content.

      Example: $50 paper book - $20 for royalties, advertising, general administrative costs, publisher profit = $30 for printing, paper, trucking of the dead trees. Sell the book for $20 + retailer markup = $28.

      I can live with that for the same content. Now if they'd allow for that content to be transferred easily ..... yeah, dream on. I guess if someone want's to borrow a book on the eReader, you would have to lend them the entire reader. That sucks!

      The manufacturing and distribution costs of a paperback book are not much more than half a dollar today. Printed paper is nearly cheap as dirt meanwhile and trucking goods around is also not exactly expensive (you couldn't afford even bottled water if it were otherwise). And digital distribution is not free.

      I agree that Ebooks are much less worth to the buyer but they're not that much cheaper to make. If written text in digital form would be worth much all bloggers would be rich.

    4. Re:My prediction by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Were they to fix the LendMe function so that you could do it multiple times for longer periods, that would give them a serious advantage over the competition. I've personally no problems with them make sharing books, like a book, but this whole you can share it once for up to two weeks stuff is bullshit.

    5. Re:My prediction by smart_ass · · Score: 1

      re:
      I guess if someone want's to borrow a book on the eReader, you would have to lend them the entire reader. That sucks!

      In our area our local libraries have downloadable content ... ebooks with expiry dates for certain e-readers. I actually think that is a pretty sweet wat of using DRM "for the people". This still allows me to borrow a book from the library with no possible late fees and I don't even have to go there to get it.

      Admittedly selection is still lacking, but in principle it is good.

      Same could be done on a personal level. Copy could be lent with a set time and then my copy gets locked during that period.

      --
      Ouch ... did I just say that.
    6. Re:My prediction by True+Vox · · Score: 1

      Oh, wow. I didn't realize it was only able to be lent once. That is pretty worthless. So if I want to send it to my aunt Jane, I won't be able to let my cousin Vinny read it after her?

      --
      "Gratuitous complexity is akin to chaos" - True Vox
    7. Re:My prediction by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      I've lent hundreds of books to one person, but I can't count more than a few I've ever lent to more than more than one person. (Yeah, part of it is I don't always get the book back.) But for me it's really not a restriction.

  5. Razors vs. razorblades by starling · · Score: 1

    It doesn't matter to them if the profit on the reader is razor-thin (heh) or even negative, so long as people are buying overpriced e-books.

  6. The lock in is more important by Coopjust · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Everyone is learning from Apple (used to be the case with music, still the case with apps):

    When you entice people to make a significant investment in your platform (via books with your proprietary DRM system - the nook uses ePUBs, but it's wrapped with their own DRM) so switching means throwing all of the books they bought away, you'll have them buying your device (and more importantly, the books) for years to come.

    Some people would argue that you argue that you only read books once, but some people watch movies, read books, etc. multiple times.

    1. Re:The lock in is more important by starling · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What Apple did was invert the normal rules by being first to market with a credible MP3 player and leveraging their extremely loyal base. It was a beautifully executed coup, but not one that Amazon or B&N are in a position to duplicate. They gave it a go, but now they're having to fall back on the tried and true Gillette model.

    2. Re:The lock in is more important by Coopjust · · Score: 1

      The razor/blade model is somewhat applicable and somewhat not.

      It's applicable in the sense that the eReaders aren't a major cash cow (like the iPod is), but it's not applicable in the sense that the blades (books) don't dull. There's a cost to switching that builds up over time as you invest into a library.

    3. Re:The lock in is more important by starling · · Score: 1

      There's something to that, but I'd say that the majority of books are read once or twice at most so in that sense they're disposable. Of course there are reference books too, but how much of a market will they be? When Amazon tried introducing the Kindle 2 to college students they found it unsatisfactory as a way to read and refer to text books so that's probably not going to be a huge market.

      On the truly disposable side, newspapers and magazines are frothing at the bit to get digital subscriptions on the iPad, but e-ink needs colour to make it a compelling choice. My bet is that these readers will find their niche in recreational novels, where the content is effectively disposable leading to a revenue stream based on sales of content, not hardware.

    4. Re:The lock in is more important by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      It's applicable in the sense that the eReaders aren't a major cash cow (like the iPod is), but it's not applicable in the sense that the blades (books) don't dull. There's a cost to switching that builds up over time as you invest into a library.

      A major concern of mine, and a reason why I'm very hesitant to buy books from either amazon or B&N, indeed, any sight that uses DRM.

      I could put up with a DVD style encryption - able to download to ANY e-reader as long as I authenticate.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
  7. Planning on using an Evo or Droid X instead by Nysul · · Score: 2, Interesting

    With a 4"+ screen it bridges the gap enough between too small and not portable. While e-ink may mean less strain on the eyes, I mostly read at night so I would need some sort of light anyways.

  8. A dedicated reader makes more sense to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With the ADD/ADHD world we live driven by technology which distracts and provides easier paths than focusing on a single task, a dedicated reader suits me much better for productivity in reading. iPhone, iPad, laptops, etc. provide too many distractions when I'm trying to read. I'd much rather be playing a game, listening to music, watching Youtube, streaming Netflix or almost anything else than reading a book if a device offers alternatives.

    Most people nowadays spend more time context switching than productively accomplishing tasks all fed by devices that do more than one thing and do them well, interupt us with notifications and provide mind-numbing entertainment at the touch of a button.

    When I want to read and really get into a book and enjoy it, I use my dedicated eReader (in my case, a sony which supports ePub). I've never been anywhere nearly productive reading e-texts on any other device.

    1. Re:A dedicated reader makes more sense to me by thrawn_aj · · Score: 1

      THIS

  9. Kindle DX? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At the size of a Kindle DX a dedicated e-reader makes sense.. the standard versions screens are too small and don't provide enough value over cell phone screens for the price.

  10. public library by Zecheus · · Score: 1

    I think there is an application for ebooks at the public library. It'll be cool to walk in with your ebook and then access the public libraries entire catalog. Research and magazine sections as well.

  11. Day Late, Dollar Short by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Everybody is using the iPad anyway.

    This is so very reminiscent of the end of the VHS-Betamax wars - and in case you wondered, the iPad is VHS, fwiw.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:Day Late, Dollar Short by thrawn_aj · · Score: 1

      I'll wait for DVD then.

  12. As an owner of an iPad and a Sony reader I say by masmullin · · Score: 2, Informative

    I own both a Sony reader and an iPad. The Sony reader is far better at reading fiction than the iPad. The iPad is great for more technical stuff and magazine like reading.

    1. Re:As an owner of an iPad and a Sony reader I say by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      I own both a Sony reader and an iPad. The Sony reader is far better at reading fiction than the iPad. The iPad is great for more technical stuff and magazine like reading.

      Really?? Why? What's the difference between them. Just asking because I've got an iPad and I've been enjoying using it as an e-book reader -- both iBooks and Stanza. Quite a lot actually.

      Just curious as to why the experience it better for fiction on the Sony. Because the iPad is better for multi-media kind of stuff, or because the Sony feels more like a book?

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    2. Re:As an owner of an iPad and a Sony reader I say by commodoresloat · · Score: 2, Funny

      The Sony reader is far better at reading fiction than the iPad.

      That's because the iPad only deals in Truth.

    3. Re:As an owner of an iPad and a Sony reader I say by Stray7Xi · · Score: 1

      Why? What's the difference between them.

      A pound, or about the same difference as a paperback versus a hardcover. Not an issue for light reading, but big deal for reading sessions that last several hours. Kindle I can hold up naturally for long periods with one hand.

    4. Re:As an owner of an iPad and a Sony reader I say by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Really?? Why? What's the difference between them. Just asking because I've got an iPad and I've been enjoying using it as an e-book reader -- both iBooks and Stanza. Quite a lot actually.

      I'm not GP, but having used both (tho iPad only briefly), I can try to guess.

      First is the weight. Sony Reader, depending on the generation, is either 250g or 285g. Non-3G iPad is 680g. That's 2.5x as much! I've tried to use iPad while holding it in one hand, and it seems that it simply isn't designed to be used that way for considerable periods of time due to its weight - but it's precisely how you read a book! In contrast, PRS can be easily held with one hand, with fingers positioning over any available set of page flipping controls.

      The more subjective part is the eInk screen. This one is hard to explain, you just have to use it to feel the difference (or not, since some people seem to be unimpressed).

  13. good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    never looked much at the nook, will now, forget sony, I dont want to flip my reader on and be forced with "new firmware that removes features" or tough luck, no new content (that is IF sony is still in the content market, my psp seems to be gesturing no)

  14. Not Doomed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, they're only doomed by uncreative people. I think folks like PocketBook can make E-Ink a popular item. There's really no comparison to the eye strain thing. The PocketBook 360 rotates to the 4 cardinal directions so you can hold it with either hand. Plus it is small enough to be a separate device that you can take for reading.

    The ultimate device would be one which used the mechanics of Eink, but to include an OLED on the black side instead of black ink. You see that if the black spot were an OLED turned off, then the screen would behave like E-ink until you wanted to watch a video. Then the blackspot would turn on, and you'd have higher refresh for other apps.

    I told E-ink about the above idea because I think it is probably something that is possible.

  15. Uhhh - doesn't the Nook run the Android OS? by MadHungarian · · Score: 1

    At least I thought it did.

    1. Re:Uhhh - doesn't the Nook run the Android OS? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      It does.

    2. Re:Uhhh - doesn't the Nook run the Android OS? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      It does. In fact, you can root it, at which point you can get APKs loaded onto it (though, so far, it is still a hack minefield all in all).

  16. Star Wars tie-in? by Tumbleweed · · Score: 5, Funny

    iPad meh...

    Is that Apple's version of Natalie Portman?

    1. Re:Star Wars tie-in? by winkydink · · Score: 1

      No, I think it's Apple's new Top Chef thing.

      --

      "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

  17. I think Game Over by hotfireball · · Score: 1

    I think, it is pretty much Game Over for dedicated readers.

    You want that or not, but iPad won, even so far it is sold less in units in total. But still it will kill Kindle, I think. And devices that will be built on top of Android will replace Kindle and stuff like that. Simply because they can do more than just reading a book.

    Especially last update from Apple to iPad on reading PDFs is really a killer feature. To be fair, Kindle is very nice gadget, but unfortunately, not enough good anymore.

  18. Well you can slap Apple for that crap by Shivetya · · Score: 1, Interesting

    because they found a new customer, publishers. We are just the frill too line the publisher's pockets. Amazon was doing great with their pricing model yet people still yelped over the "high costs". Well for the time being we will have to look back on their model as the good old days.

    I am disappointed that the larger Kindle is still held at its price. That is the one I am most interested in. Can't stand the iPad, totally useless in the sun; as in I like to read outdoors, I don't need another device to make a basement dweller. I compared both, the benefit of having geeks for coworkers and while the iPad has more function in the realm of books the Kindle just is it. One e-ink comes out in color that will remove one of the last complaints people have with it. Well that and the ability to easily annotate entries.

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
    1. Re:Well you can slap Apple for that crap by serbanp · · Score: 1

      don't be stupid! he is totally right and you know it.

    2. Re:Well you can slap Apple for that crap by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 1

      I love the sound of cognitive dissonance in the morning.

    3. Re:Well you can slap Apple for that crap by fredmosby · · Score: 1

      Can't stand the iPad, totally useless in the sun; as in I like to read outdoors, I don't need another device to make a basement dweller.

      The iPad is hard to read when held in direct sunlight on a sunny day. In any other conditions, such as in the shade under a tree, it is perfectly readable. Unless you like to read books while sunbathing it's a non-issue.

    4. Re:Well you can slap Apple for that crap by shellbeach · · Score: 1

      Unless you like to read books while sunbathing

      ... and you don't?? Surely I'm not the only person who likes to read whilst sitting in the sun ...

    5. Re:Well you can slap Apple for that crap by StripedCow · · Score: 1

      Once e-ink comes out in color that will remove one of the last complaints people have with it. Well that and the ability to easily annotate entries.

      You forgot to mention the slowness of e-ink screens. For example, it is impossible to scroll e-ink like you can scroll a computer screen.

      --
      If Pandora's box is destined to be opened, *I* want to be the one to open it.
    6. Re:Well you can slap Apple for that crap by fredmosby · · Score: 1

      I can't tell if you're serious or you're being sarcastic. Putting on sunblock to read a book seems strange to me though.

    7. Re:Well you can slap Apple for that crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      where I come from theres this little place called a 'Beach' where there is little to do but sit in the sun reading a book, strange I know but if you left your mothers basement for once you'd discover they're pretty popular...

    8. Re:Well you can slap Apple for that crap by Mongoose+Disciple · · Score: 1

      I do a sizeable chunk of my reading for the year on vacation(s) -- usually on the beach or by a pool.

      I realize this isn't everyone, but for me to not be able to read in sunlight really is a deal-breaker.

    9. Re:Well you can slap Apple for that crap by mariox19 · · Score: 1

      Am I the only one who finds dead-tree books hard to read in the sunlight? The reflection off of a white page hurts my eyes.

      My point is that I really don't see how the "reading in sunlight" angle is all that important. I've never been able to do it.

      --

      quiquid id est, timeo puellas et oscula dantes.

    10. Re:Well you can slap Apple for that crap by MistrBlank · · Score: 1

      You're really going to bring a device susceptible to water damage next to a pool when the alternative is an $8 paperback?

      Do yourself a favor and avoid the melanoma, sit under the shade.

    11. Re:Well you can slap Apple for that crap by MistrBlank · · Score: 1

      You do realize SUNBATHING IS UNHEALTHY.

      Most of us would like to read outside, but are content to do it in shadier places to avoid melanoma. We're also the same people that like to read in bed where position and need for external light sources become an issue.

      And lets be honest, if you're sunbathing at the beach, you're not bringing a few hundred dollar device that will be susceptible to damage from sand, water damage by a pool, sunblock or sweat or exposed to potential theft while taking a dip in the pool or ocean. You are not the target audience.

    12. Re:Well you can slap Apple for that crap by thechanklybore · · Score: 1

      Speak for yourself. Sunbathing here in Sweden is absolutely not unhealthy at reasonable levels (IE - not without sunblock at 1PM). I also like to have a good book with me to read in the sun (on the beach/in the park or wherever) and so back-lighting *is* a problem. Also - why the hell wouldn't I take my device to the beach? Are you too clumsy to keep your stuff out of the sand?

    13. Re:Well you can slap Apple for that crap by Mongoose+Disciple · · Score: 1

      You're really going to bring a device susceptible to water damage next to a pool when the alternative is an $8 paperback?

      Yup. Because traveling with let's say 6-10 books, some of which will be hardcovers, kind of sucks. Especially since we're already usually trying to cut luggage weight to avoid extra charges.

      Again, that's not everyone, but that's what works for me.

  19. Android apps by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

    I'm waiting for two things: an e-ink reader that has nice contrast (actual BLACK on light grey or preferrably on white-ish), and for e-book reader Android apps for Kindle/Nook/etc ebooks for my new htc EVO 4G.

    The last time I had to move, my 120+ boxes of books nearly killed me, and I've filled many more boxes with books since then. *sigh*

    1. Re:Android apps by swb · · Score: 2, Funny

      You might try another hobby or social activity besides reading. That'll make moving less strenuous and maybe provide people to help.

  20. What makes Android tablets "coming"? by gig · · Score: 1, Insightful

    One thing that seems to be true with Android is it's always "coming". There's always a really great Android moment on the horizon.

    But there are already many Android tablets. They're not coming. They've been here a while. Last January's CES was infested with them. They all just suck. They get reviewed and they ship 10 units and they go away. The Nook which is mentioned in this article is an Android tablet!

    The idea that manufacturers are going to just copy iPad is asinine. Look at the Sprint EVO, which had 3 iPhones to copy and it gets 8 hours of standby battery life. In other words, if you don't use it at all, it still dies in 8 hours. A key feature of iPad is the 10-12 hours of actual use, and 30 days of standby. I've gotten on a train in Silicon Valley with a fully-charged iPad, surfed on 3G the whole way, and when I'm putting it away in San Francisco, it still says "100%" in the battery meter. I've had the device for 3 weeks and never even seen a low battery warning.

    And iOS is not a phone OS scaled-up, it's desktops-and-servers OS X with a touch interface on top. Android doesn't have that kind of graphics layer, multichannel audio, advanced typography, C API, and other desktop-class features that only become even more important as you scale the display up. Being able to port desktop C apps over rather than rewrite in Java only becomes even more important.

    And the bag of parts on an iPad approaches the retail price point. There is no room under there. A big display and battery is a big display and battery. An iPad 3G 16GB is $629 retail and Nexus One 4G with 1/4 the screen size and 30% of the battery volume is $649 retail. The biggest problem for Android v2 has been it's more expensive than iPhone! That's why it only sells on the closed networks in the US. That's why 75% of Android devices run v1.6.

    In tech, it is a fool's game to try and predict the future anyway. But if you are doing this Android-is-coming-soon thing, that is something you should talk to your therapist about. It's just become so tiresome. Any mention of iPad or iPhone online and the next thing you know "Android will be better next year!" Sheesh. It's like a reflex. If only it was as easy to actually make functional, consumer-ready devices.

    1. Re:What makes Android tablets "coming"? by bflong · · Score: 2, Informative

      You only got one of your android facts right. In your quest to find out which one it is I'm sure you will learn much.

      --
      Why is it so hot? Where am I going? What am I doing in this handbasket?
    2. Re:What makes Android tablets "coming"? by Andy+Smith · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Android will be better next year!"

      In my opinion Android is better _this_ year.

      For phones: My girlfriend updated her iPhone 3GS to the new OS last night. I see that she now has a phone that still can't compare to my HTC Desire with Android 2.1. (2.2 upgrade due within 2 weeks)

      For tablets: I don't want a locked-down tablet like the iPad. There are some sucky Android tablets out now, yes, but inevitably there will be some very good ones. And even if they aren't as pretty and slick as the iPad, they will be _better_ than the iPad because, whichever one I choose, it will be my device to do whatever I want with.

      I'm surprised that anyone would currently think Android needs to catch up with iOS. Android is far ahead. It's just that a lot of Android devices lack the "shiny factor" of the iDevices.

    3. Re:What makes Android tablets "coming"? by coryking · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I see that she now has a phone that still can't compare to my HTC Desire with Android 2.1.

      But does she think that way? Does she know exactly what version the operating system her phone is running? Do you keep telling her about how awesome your phone is and she just shrugs it off?

      Besides, why the fuck should she care exactly what version her operating system is? Who really gives a shit?

      It's just that a lot of Android devices lack the "shiny factor" of the iDevices.

      It is a hell of a lot more than the "shiny factor" that sells the iDevices. And even if it was the shiny factor, why the hell has nobody else in the market even come *close* to matching the build quality of an iDevice?

      But really, I suspect the reason so many of you are so intent on proving how awesome "Version 2.2" of your operating system is might be because you and I both know the iDevice is the future. And it pisses you off because for the first time ever, "computers" dont need you and I to maintain them. They just fucking work, instead of barely work.

      Let me tell you, it is about damn time too. The Wii did it with the game console market, and apple has done it with the "computer" market. The "computer" has come of age. And they are iPads and iPhones.

    4. Re:What makes Android tablets "coming"? by joh · · Score: 1

      For tablets: I don't want a locked-down tablet like the iPad. There are some sucky Android tablets out now, yes, but inevitably there will be some very good ones. And even if they aren't as pretty and slick as the iPad, they will be _better_ than the iPad because, whichever one I choose, it will be my device to do whatever I want with.

      Yes, but the price for that is that now Google does what it wants with all your data you happily give to them with Android. At least Apple wants just my money and offers good products for it. Google offers you shiny glass beads if you give your digital soul away. What a deal.

      I don't know if the iPad and Apple is a problem but Android and Google is not the solution to it.

    5. Re:What makes Android tablets "coming"? by illumin8 · · Score: 1, Interesting

      For phones: My girlfriend updated her iPhone 3GS to the new OS last night. I see that she now has a phone that still can't compare to my HTC Desire with Android 2.1. (2.2 upgrade due within 2 weeks)

      I think you're full of it, because iOS 4 wasn't available until today. But, on the odd chance that you aren't trolling, what specific features in iOS 4 are missing that you have in Android 2.1?

      --
      "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
    6. Re:What makes Android tablets "coming"? by stephanruby · · Score: 4, Informative

      That's why it only sells on the closed networks in the US.

      Which closed network? T-Mobile? AT&T? Verizon? Sprint? MetroPCS? Is there even a single actual network that doesn't sell Android phones anymore? Go ahead. I dare you. Name a single one. Or did you mean Android only sold on all the networks of the US (therefore implying that all the networks in the US are closed)? Because, I can tell you. I'm currently in the UK right now, and there isn't a single shop in the UK that doesn't have Android devices on sale right now and that aren't selling like hot cakes. And sure, the iPhone is still very popular in the UK right now, but at the sales counter where it counts, it's getting assaulted by several very good Android phones that are all selling just as well as the iPhone. It's not fair fight anymore. One phone against 39 phones, several of which are actually far superior to the new iPhone.

      That's why 75% of Android devices run v1.6.

      No, it's more like 50% of the Android devices are running v2.1. I can cite my source. Can you even cite yours?

      Being able to port desktop C apps over rather than rewrite in Java only becomes even more important.

      Please repeat after me: The C and C++ apps of the Android NDK do not run on the Dalvik VM. The C and C++ apps of the Android NDK do not run on the Dalvik VM. Please repeat this one hundred times.

      and the next thing you know "Android will be better next year!"

      If anyone is saying that, and repeating it ad nausea um, you're the only one. I've corrected your strawman argument plus several of your other factual errors in your other threads. But you don't even seem to even read my responses, or even care about citing your sources.

    7. Re:What makes Android tablets "coming"? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      And the bag of parts on an iPad approaches the retail price point. There is no room under there. A big display and battery is a big display and battery. An iPad 3G 16GB is $629 retail and Nexus One 4G with 1/4 the screen size and 30% of the battery volume is $649 retail.

      I won't even bother with the rest of this post, but this stupidity just stands out so much that it's impossible to ignore. Historically, you paid - and still pay - more money for similar performance in smaller size. That's because smaller size with the same CPU power, same screen resolution etc is much harder to do. This is especially true of the screen - for comparison, it is 250dpi on N1 vs 130dpi on iPad. Feel the difference.

      At some point the curve flattens, and from there, bigger size simply means juicier hardware, because there's already enough size for the cheapest stuff you can get - this is the point where netbooks are. And iPad, in terms of size and hardware, is way too close to a netbook to justify the price sticker of something like N1.

    8. Re:What makes Android tablets "coming"? by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      Yes, but the price for that is that now Google does what it wants with all your data you happily give to them with Android. At least Apple wants just my money and offers good products for it. Google offers you shiny glass beads if you give your digital soul away. What a deal.

      Ah! I see where the problem is. You're actually under the mistaken belief that Google tries to lock you into their services, or tries to prevent any competitor from having apps in its Markets. That's just plain wrong on all accounts, but I understand why an iPhone/Apple user would make that kind of mistake.

      The last time I checked, you guys were not even allowed to choose what calendar provider you had. Apple had to be your default calendar provider, no matter how many key features were missing for you. Is that still the case??? And how many other crappy stock applications from Apple are you forced to use no matter what? Calendar is one. Voice mail is a second. I take it the web browser is part of the formula as well. How many more default apps are you really still chained to Apple with?

    9. Re:What makes Android tablets "coming"? by Grygus · · Score: 1

      I wish I could mod this "-1, Scary."

    10. Re:What makes Android tablets "coming"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Wii did it with the game console market"

      Ahem. Android vs iOS pissing match aside, I think you've been drinking a bit too much of the "It just works!" kool-aid. The whole point of a console is that it's a gaming appliance rather than a full fledged computer. That was true back in the NES days, in the N64 and Playstation days, and it's true now. The only different thing about the Wii is its price point (and perhaps motion control, but that's an interface design and not even an unprecedented one. I own a Wii and my Xbox 360 is equally low maintenance).

    11. Re:What makes Android tablets "coming"? by Your.Master · · Score: 1

      Trying thinking three dimensionally. There are numerous time zones on this planet, not all of them the same as yours.

      There are plenty of places where what is to you "earlier today" is "last night". Clicking on that guy's profile, looks like he's in Scotland. I'm going to guess that you're from the United States (or at the very least, aligned longitudinally with it), because otherwise I expect you'd be familiar with the idea that what day it is where you live can be different from what day it is in the US.

    12. Re:What makes Android tablets "coming"? by salesgeek · · Score: 1

      But really, I suspect the reason so many of you are so intent on proving how awesome "Version 2.2" of your operating system is might be because you and I both know the iDevice is the future. And it pisses you off because for the first time ever, "computers" dont need you and I to maintain them. They just fucking work, instead of barely work.

      A) I hope my computer does not do any fucking work - I don't need cute little baby Apple products in my house. I refuse to change iDiapers.

      B) Gadgets are gadgets. In five years, we'll be using totally different stuff and remembering fondly the good old days when the iPad came out and all those bizarre Android phones were out there. Change in tech is good.

      C) I'd say the future is undecided, interoperable and free. Apple will be quite successful in the short term, but past performance does not guarantee future results. Android appears to be doing about as well as Windows+Intel did against the Mac in the 90s, mostly because it's open (lots of HW mfgs use it), interoperable (it supports lots of standards) and has fewer walls for both users and developers.

      D) You are confusing Android with Windows. Android devices don't need an staff of 25 IT pros to keep running.

      --
      -- $G
  21. Easier on the eyes?!? by Isomorphic · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I disagree. I've owned a Sony Reader and an iPad. The iPad is, hands down, easier on the eyes.

    The Kindle and other eInk displays have a contrast ratio of 6:1 to 7:1. The iPad backlit IPS display is 750:1 to 930:1.

    Other than perhaps directly under the sun, the iPad display wins. In dim light, the iPad owns.

    1. Re:Easier on the eyes?!? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 5, Informative

      I disagree. I've owned a Sony Reader and an iPad. The iPad is, hands down, easier on the eyes.
      The Kindle and other eInk displays have a contrast ratio of 6:1 to 7:1. The iPad backlit IPS display is 750:1 to 930:1.

      You do realize that overly high contrast is precisely what causes eyestrain? (in general, and especially common when staring at a computer/gadget screen)

    2. Re:Easier on the eyes?!? by xigxag · · Score: 1

      No I don't realize this. Source? In fact, it seems nonsensical on its face. Picture playing an FPS on a Kindle display that refreshes at LCD speeds. Would it be less of a strain to see your targets, or more of one? And even if somehow lo-contrast is better, it's fairly easy to lower the contrast on a LCD using software and often possible to dim the backlight using hardware. So why isn't everyone running their monitors in low-contrast Kindle mode?

      BTW, I own an iPod and a Kindle, and despite the legions of Kindle fans constantly insisting how much better the latter's screen is, I totally prefer reading on my little backlit iPod.

      --
      There are two kinds of people: 1) those who start arrays with one and 1) those who start them with zero.
    3. Re:Easier on the eyes?!? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 3, Informative

      No I don't realize this. Source?

      JFGI.

      In fact, it seems nonsensical on its face. Picture playing an FPS on a Kindle display that refreshes at LCD speeds. Would it be less of a strain to see your targets, or more of one?

      I don't understand why you're bringing up refresh rate - it's an altogether different issue, and it is entirely orthogonal to contrast. For book reading, it's also mostly irrelevant.

      Anyway, the simplest way is to test it for yourself by playing with the contrast settings of whatever you read books from, and noticing the level that is most forgiving on the eyes.

      Oh yes... too little contrast also causes eyestrain. However, it is much more typical for people to have contrast jacked way up on their displays than to have it low. Another common problem is keeping contrast suitable for daylight into the night, with no or little ambient lighting.

      And with decent lighting, the contrast of a good eInk screen is fine. It doesn't quite reach the perfect level - that would require a tad lighter background - but it can match a typical paper book, which is good enough.

      it's fairly easy to lower the contrast on a LCD using software and often possible to dim the backlight using hardware.

      It's true, and my comment didn't contradict that; only your assertion that extra contrast of iPad makes it superior for reading.

      So why isn't everyone running their monitors in low-contrast Kindle mode?

      You'd do your eyes good if you read text from them for long periods of time; indeed, that's precisely what I do on the rare occasion when I read from my netbook. However, more often you're dealing with media richer than text, and colors in particular are better perceived with higher-contrast display.

      BTW, I own an iPod and a Kindle, and despite the legions of Kindle fans constantly insisting how much better the latter's screen is, I totally prefer reading on my little backlit iPod.

      I don't own a Kindle, and have only tried it a few times when it was on display in the store. I do, however, own two other eInk-based readers. Judging by a few replies that I've got in comments to this story from people who used Kindle more, its display quality is sub-par for eInk standards. The one I can personally recommend, from using for 2 years, is Sony PRS-505 - its screen seems to be higher-contrast than even the later Sony readers that I've seen.

      I do wonder how you deal with the extra weight (more than 2 times compared to Kindle, and almost 3 times compared to PRS-505) of the iPad when holding it with one hand for reading...

    4. Re:Easier on the eyes?!? by Isomorphic · · Score: 1

      So... printed books cause eyestrain?

      Or are you arguing that eInk screens cause less eyestrain than printed books?

    5. Re:Easier on the eyes?!? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      I'm arguing that eInk causes about as much (or as little) eyestrain as printed books. Whereas an iPad with typical settings (as in, what I actually see people using) causes more.

      But, yeah, reading books strains the eye, too.

    6. Re:Easier on the eyes?!? by mdwh2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The Kindle and other eInk displays have a contrast ratio of 6:1 to 7:1. The iPad backlit IPS display is 750:1 to 930:1.

      And how does it compare to netbooks, and other tablets?

      I mean, I'm confused by this obsession of only comparing the Ipad to e-readers, as if other LCD portable computers didn't exist. I mean, you either want the benefits of e-ink (in which case, the Ipad doesn't count), or you don't (in which case, there was never any point in buying an e-reader compared with LCD devices). Perhaps this means the Ipad doesn't do well compared with other LCD devices, and thus can only compete as being an "e-reader" with LCD.

    7. Re:Easier on the eyes?!? by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

      Looking at the reviews for kindle on Amazon, it becomes apparent that a lot of kindle owners do not consider the dark-gray, against a slightly lighter-gray background, to be eye-strain free.

      Where I work, the lighting is somewhat dim which is good for reading computer monitors. I can read technical books without any problems but I cannot read text on the Kindle without straining my eyes. Adding a lamp to my office would cause annoying reflections on the shiny computer monitors.

      the Kindle 2 has low contrast. The screen background is very dark. Why the background is gray and not white is puzzling to me. The text is also not black, but light black. To me it looks like gray on gray and is completely not acceptable. I was further shocked to find that there is no way to adjust the contrast. That is really messed up.

      Trying to read black lettering on grey background is difficult. I called to see if the contrast or backlight could be adjusted and no such luck.

    8. Re:Easier on the eyes?!? by mr_matticus · · Score: 0, Troll

      Except you know that not to be the case, since as you are so keen to point out and apparently so eager to read and comment on all the Apple stories, the iPad's superior display has been widely reviewed to critical acclaim.

      It's so sad to see a person reduced to a caricature. Your life must be so empty when you can't be a horse's ass about Apple, since it's clear you can't simply let go and move on with your life.

    9. Re:Easier on the eyes?!? by Polo · · Score: 1

      No, I though eyestrain was caused by having to focus your eyes with the muscles.

      This happens when when your pupils are opened, and you have something close to you.

      The Kindle had an advantage because you can read with a bright light, so your pupil will close down, and your book will be in focus naturally. By naturally, I mean it will be optically in focus because it will be in your depth of field. With your pupils opened up, you have a shallow depth of field and use your eye muscles to move your focus to the book and maintain it.

      Actually, if you're using an iPad, it might help a bit to do it in a brightly lit room, because that will make your pupils close down a bit. Unfortunately, you can't get a bright light to increase the brightness of the iPad screen, so it only works a little.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Depth_of_field
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ciliary_muscle

    10. Re:Easier on the eyes?!? by xigxag · · Score: 1

      The reason I brought up refresh rate was to make it possible to even imagine playing an FPS on a Kindle-type screen. IOW to bring things to a ceteris paribus level so that we could consider whether low-contrast is better or worse. I'm not sure I agree with Google's collective wisdom, it seems to be mostly of the "it's true because I say so" sort, as opposed to some kind of documented studies.

      But overall you're certainly more informed on this subject than I am so in the absence of a firm reason to question you, I'll defer to your expertise and thank you very much for the informative reply.

      --
      There are two kinds of people: 1) those who start arrays with one and 1) those who start them with zero.
  22. Let History repeat itself! (or not) by Psaakyrn · · Score: 2

    Yeah, just like how consoles were replaced by those general purpose PCs (and imitators, *cough*). It's gonna happen soon, right?

    1. Re:Let History repeat itself! (or not) by ducomputergeek · · Score: 1

      Used to have a laptop, G5 Tower, and Mac Mini at home until a little over a year ago when a storm destroyed my house. Now I have a MacMini hooked up the TV that acts a media center, a Wii, and an iPad 3G. And I see a lot more of my friends going Xbox/PS3/Wii and an iPad with a laptop they have from work. I'm to the point where the last thing I want to do when I come home is mess around with computer. I deal with computer shit at work all day and even then I'm down to my iPad3G + docking station.

      I don't code anymore, all I need is the mac mini to download and compile the latest versions of our software to test and sign off on. We have a iPhone/iPad App for our bug reporting and then the iPad does pretty much everything else I need. In fact, if the iPhone could use an external keyboard, I wouldn't even need the iPad.

      --
      "The problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money" - Thatcher.
    2. Re:Let History repeat itself! (or not) by Winckle · · Score: 1

      With the new OS 4 you can use a bluetooth keyboard :)

  23. Neglect the benefits & netbooks win by walterbyrd · · Score: 0

    * The fact that they get battery life in weeks instead of hours

    I don't need something to last weeks, 8 hours is fine.

    * The fact that they use minimal power between page flips (vs. a relatively steady draw)

    See above.

    * The fact that they are easier on the eyes

    For reading indoors, an LCD is just as good, maybe better. At least from my experience, and I have terrible vision. I have read my iPod Touch for hours without my eyes getting tired - wearing my readers, of course.

    * The fact that they are more easily read in sunlight...

    As far as I can tell, that's only real advantage of dedicated ebook reader. For the $498 price take, I would rather use a regular book.

    Benefits of netbook:

    * Much cheaper
    * Far more powerful and flexible. Not just a uni-tastker
    * Back-lit screen can be read in the dark.
    * Color screen
    * Can read any format: chm, doc, pdf, whatever. This is my biggest complaint against dedicated ebook readers, none of them read a pdf very well, and converters do not work very well either.

  24. Barnes & Nobel Library by chill · · Score: 4, Informative

    Reading the details the Nook will allow you to hook up for free to any B&N or AT&T WiFi hotspot. If you're in a B&N bookstore, you can "read" any of the ebooks for free. You can't take them with you if don't buy them. So, you can just come in and kill a few hours drinking over-priced coffee and reading like at a library.

    They also have a "lending" function, as long as you use their software. I won't buy DRM books, but for people who don't mind you can "lend" an e-book to a friend for 14 days. Works with the iPod, Android, Mac & PC as well as some other platforms. Oh, and the Nook runs Android.

    --
    Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    1. Re:Barnes & Nobel Library by hawk16zz · · Score: 1

      Oh, and the Nook runs Android.

      I'm surprised it took this long for that come up. Also with the latest updates I hear it's even easier to gain root access to the nook.

      --
      Take me where I cannot stand...
    2. Re:Barnes & Nobel Library by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, you can now jailbreak the Nook via software (old method required cracking open the case) and use it to run custom apps (the.

      http://nookdevs.com/Softroot

    3. Re:Barnes & Nobel Library by osssmkatz · · Score: 1

      Actually, Pouge has confirmed that the Nook's in-store reading function only works for an hour. And last I read, the Lendme function only works on certain books, and only one time for the life of the book. What's worth I purchased a book despite this.. and I can't read it on my iPad. It's in a "non-supported format." Excuse me, what? This ebook store has only been open for not very long, and they are already having incompatible formats. I intend to contact customer service about this. --Sam

  25. Got one on order now by mykos · · Score: 1

    Just ordered a wifi one...hope they come in stock soon so I can have it by the end of the week. A price drop was all I had been waiting for to jump on the ereader bandwagon. Android is pretty nice too!

    1. Re:Got one on order now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'll love your nook. I have one and it's incredible!!

  26. It does not matter... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They all still utterly SUCK at viewing PDF files.

    I have nearly a terabyte in PDF files. All my back issues of "Nuts and Volts" and other magazines that back in the early 2000's were not stupid and started offering E versions of their magazine. I would love to be ableto read them on the ebook reader... Problem is the Nook, Sony and Kindle all utterly suck at PDF reading.

    Even the ebook reader made by the PDF reader alternative the "foxit" reader sucks horribly at PDF. I dont care if I have to scroll. I would love to be able to get a e-reader that the display is 8.5X11 or a solid A4 size. Because most technical stuff needs to be full page.

    I havent tried a iPad... Only 1 person I know has one.

    1. Re:It does not matter... by ihxo · · Score: 1

      Goodreader on iPad works great with PDFs, you can even crop out those white spaces so you get larger text.

    2. Re:It does not matter... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 3, Interesting

      A 6" 600x800 screen, as seen in most readers, is simply not high-res enough to read most PDFs in fit-page-to-screen mode - and you can't really go for anything else, as scrolling is very painful with such low screen refresh rates, and PDFs don't reflow. You need something bigger, like Kindle DX, or, better yed, iLiad. iPad also does better largely due to high-resolution (well, and the fact that it can actually scroll them reasonably well).

    3. Re:It does not matter... by smart_ass · · Score: 1

      I have Kindle International (the wee one)

      Why do you need to read PDF?

      All my e-Books are in re-flowable format that looks great on the small screen.

      Sure ... the PDF of the book I downloaded on Bit Torrent doesn't look great ... but then again I have no rights to that do I?

      And if I really want to I can convert with a numbr of apps to convert to an ebook format so the device will remember what page I am at (doesn't happen for a PDF ... at least on the Kindle)

      --
      Ouch ... did I just say that.
    4. Re:It does not matter... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Why do you need to read PDF?
      All my e-Books are in re-flowable format that looks great on the small screen.

      Please tell me where I can purchase technical IT/CS books (say, something published by O'Reilly) in any reflowable format.

      And if I really want to I can convert with a numbr of apps to convert to an ebook format

      Doing that to a PDF would still require reflowing it, just not in real-time - and there's no good way to do it right. You can get some approximation - e.g. some PDF readers for smartphones try that - but it inevitably breaks formatting for some more complicated stuff.

    5. Re:It does not matter... by xtracto · · Score: 1

      I agree that current eBook reader resolution is not optimal to display a full page PDF. However there is this neat program called soPDF which makes it very very easy to trim the white spaces around a page (the margins) and also allows you to cut each page in two (vertically) so that you see half page every time.

      Even though I do not yet have an eBook reader, I use it to prepare some long pdf for print, I can print 3 pages per page in good size (6 pages per sheet). That's how I print long text like R manuals.

      It is also quite useful to prepare PDFs for reading in small screen in general.

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    6. Re:It does not matter... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      However there is this neat program called soPDF which makes it very very easy to trim the white spaces around a page (the margins) and also allows you to cut each page in two (vertically) so that you see half page every time.

      If you split page in two without reflowing, the result would have to be read in landscape mode. Most dedicated readers can handle that (IIRC only Nook doesn't have landscape so far, though you can get it with third-party software if you root it), but their form factor is physically designed for optimal comfort when holding them in portrait mode - weight distribution, placement of page flipping controls, etc.

      Indeed, if you are content with viewing in landscape in page-chunk-by-page-chunk mode, Sony PRS can do it out of the box directly on PDF files dropped onto its storage, with no special software or preparation needed. But it's still inconvenient enough, I find that I never actually use it.

    7. Re:It does not matter... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 1280x1024 screen in the ILiad and the Kindle DX isn't much better for PDFs originally intended for A4 or Letter paper. It's usable if the fonts are large (say, 14 points) but with small text you have to start guessing on the basis of the overall shape of words because the individual letter shapes are lost in the pixels.

      Now the upcoming Skiff e-reader with a 1600x1200 screen is starting to get there. If only they managed to bring it to the market...

    8. Re:It does not matter... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I assume you haven't heard about ManyBooks.net, where you can find thousands of books you will never need to reflow, because you can download them in the exact format your device makes the best of. Or read it online as a web page. Your choice.

      I assume you haven't heard about all the tools (Calibre, chm2pdf...) that allow you to change in seconds the format of most of books to suit your device.

      I assume you assume that Adobe garbage about PDF being the right format for e-books, when its only the last resource when you can't find another way to convert an arcane format to something your device can eat. That's the trouble with most technical books: they have a lot of graphics, so people scans them as PDF because it's easier that way, and you end with books you can't read on e-ink, mobile... Reading a big book on a little screen is never going to be easy, iPhone or not. Best formats for distributing technical books are formats like CHM (surprise!) or HTML (but it's messy dealing with so much files), which can manage graphics easily, are not page size dependant and can be converted to other formats without losing data. Sometimes, the right answer to convert a book to your device is to convert it to the right sized PDF, but it is not a good interchange format; if you throw it at a diferent screen, it will be awful.

      The best e-book formats are like the best Internet formats: open, not screen/page dependant, standard, easy to convert, no feature crap.

    9. Re:It does not matter... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I assume you haven't heard about ManyBooks.net, where you can find thousands of books you will never need to reflow, because you can download them in the exact format your device makes the best of. Or read it online as a web page. Your choice.

      I just went there, and it seems to be mostly fiction. Note that I was specifically talking about technical literature in my post. For fiction, there are many places to buy books in proper formats.

      I assume you haven't heard about all the tools (Calibre, chm2pdf...) that allow you to change in seconds the format of most of books to suit your device.

      Calibre is great, but it doesn't help you with PDFs. Once again: you need to reflow them to fit the screen, and the format is not properly reflowable by design (because it requires absolutely positioned and sized text runs).

      I assume you assume that Adobe garbage about PDF being the right format for e-books

      No, I don't. I'd gladly buy technical books in e.g. ePub, or even HTML - problem is, practically no-one is selling them that way (or at least I haven't seen any). Hence the question: if you know of any place that actually sells technical books in any reflowable format, please just give the link to it. Don't preach how PDF is crap etc; I know already. Just give me the way to actually use something different.

    10. Re:It does not matter... by supercrisp · · Score: 1

      Not all reading is prose with indented quotations or other formatting that doesn't re-flow well. Everything I would need to read on such a device has formatting that needs to be preserved. A short list of such features: indented quotations, verse, 2+ column lists, graphs, charts, figures. And you really earn your handle with the remark on PDF: all my professional publications available online are in PDF. This is true of just about all fields' journals. Basically what I'm saying is that reflowable text is fine for a limited subset of pleasure reading, but most professional reading relies upon spatial organization and graphical representation of information.

  27. I bought a Nook a month ago... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and I love it, but I feel I could have saved $110 if I would have bought it now (the 3G doesn't work were I live, so I'm ok with the wifi version).

  28. We're getting there. by tthomas48 · · Score: 1

    These will be worth buying once they're at $50. And they'll sell billions. I don't really see why Amazon isn't just doing the $50 deal today to take out the market and get people buying ebooks. This is another market that's waiting to be flooded with either overpriced Apple hardware or commodity hardware that can read books from anywhere. If Amazon wants to be "the eBook store" they need to make their reader ubiquitous.

  29. A YEAR AGO by N8F8 · · Score: 1

    Those prices were from over a year ago. They should be a fraction of that price now.

    --
    "God fights on the side with the best artillery." - Napoleon, Marshal of France - speaking truth to power
    1. Re:A YEAR AGO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      99/100 is a fraction of the price too.

    2. Re:A YEAR AGO by astrocreap · · Score: 1

      2/1 is a fraction of the price as well

  30. iPad -- and its coming imitators ?? by wvmarle · · Score: 1

    Ahum. iPad and its coming imitators? Anyone who thinks so has been living under a rock. Days after the release of the iPad I already received advertising e-mails from Chinese manufacturers producing such lookalikes. And indeed mostly Android based, though I have also seen Windows based tablets. Same for the iPhone. That one took a little longer as the actual device outlook was a little less predictable.

    The big difference starts of course with price (about half), choice (hundreds - in different sizes and colours) and functionality (Android vs. iOS).

    But to say imitations are coming - well no, not really. The big manufacturers may have yet to launch imitations, but then they are always slow to react. The Chinese have their imitations on the market already for well almost as long as the real thing is there.

  31. You can root it too by mykos · · Score: 1

    I certainly hope so! I've been reading that you can root it too and run some android apps. One of the big things I look for in just about any device is hackability.

  32. lemon juice on your face != invisible to cameras by Gary+W.+Longsine · · Score: 1

    One well known contributor to what people call "eye strain" is a bright room environment (a sunlit room) contrasted with a dimmer display. The contrast ratio of the device itself contributes to reduced eyestrain, if black and white are more distinct from one another.

    Anyone that up-modded you should read this: The Anosognosic’s Dilemma: Something’s Wrong but You’ll Never Know What It Is (Part 1) because they are too stupid to wield mod points.

    --
    If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine.
  33. Not really by mykos · · Score: 1

    It's only game over for people who want a more expensive device that does more. Although you may not see the point of inexpensive, single-purpose devices, there are millions of people who do. Nobody "won"; there are simply two different markets that buy two different items. And as cheap as ebook readers are getting, a lot of people will have both sitting on their night stand.

    1. Re:Not really by hotfireball · · Score: 1

      iPad expensive? You must be kidding. Some also thinks that Nokia N900 is also very cheap device, because all these stupid Apple fanboys admire S.Jobs and devote their stupid heads to iPhone, believing in their religion, hence iPhone must be very expensive and mac users are morons, right?...

      Just take a look yourself, counting *everything*, not just a blunt hardware and the device. Take for the same price a decent netbook. You will get a difference about ~$50, which is not a money at all if we talk about reliable device for years.

      Moreover, if you get a 10 single purpose cheap devices, so in a sum it will be much more expensive than have 1 multi-purpose device that has a bigger price. And also ugly to live with them: you get one device with yourself, instead of a sack of gadgets.

      Now, take an Eee netbook. In particular, look for Asus Eee PC 1008HA Sea Shell. Look at its price. When you will compare all the issues together (including real life events, ecosystem, infrastructure behind, app store if such (in Linux you have package manager, but still lack of store where to get good music, movies etc), then you will find that netbook is clearly a piece of junk, if you want my opinion. An expensive piece of junk, because just throwing away ~$500 to the trash bin, well I don't have such money, unfortunately.

      Finally, I was repairing these things a lot myself for my friends and putting Linux there to make their life easier. But even you put Linux in it, it is still remains a junk: bad and slow Intel Atom processor, gets hot, clunky, wacky, wires around, sh!tty keyboard, battery life and just overall ugly and slow. This is a junk, dude, that you are unable to normally enjoy it or make any real work on it. You can not seriously work with iPad too, but at least other functions done with iPad is way better (gaming, book reading for example) than the same in a typical netbook.

      I hope that touch devices, Android powered, will bring some more sense. However, they will still suffer from a nubmer of things, including absence of something like iTunes Store with all the goods inside, etc.

    2. Re:Not really by mykos · · Score: 1

      I was just saying that the iPad is more expensive than an ebook reader if you want to read ebooks.

  34. How about no books? by antdude · · Score: 1

    How about for those who don't read books at all like me? [grin]

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  35. Re:lemon juice on your face != invisible to camera by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

    One well known contributor to what people call "eye strain" is a bright room environment (a sunlit room) contrasted with a dimmer display.

    Yes, and the other - much more widespread - contributor to eye strain is a dark room environment contrasted with a bright display. Countless geeks can testify to that.

    So, your point being?..

  36. foxit pro and a laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FREE foxit pro reader and laptop does sooo much more

  37. Dedicated Readers Doomed? I don't think so by malus · · Score: 1

    "Some believe that dedicated e-readers are doomed in the long run to lose out to general-purpose devices such as the iPad" -- Not so fast. I specifically bought the mid-range Sony reader *because* it is a dedicated reader. They have trumped Amazon, and B&N with simplicity, specificity. I can swipe back and forth between pages just as if I was reading a book. I can read *way* more formats than the two other (main) vendors devices support. Does tethering to my computer bother me? Not in the slightest. Being able to download (ONLY FROM the vendor's store) over 3G wireless seems like more of a tether, to me. You're locked in, and that's just the way they like it. The sony I have has two memory slots, a DUO and a standard SD card slot. I can shove ~90 gigabytes of books into this thing (at present).

    But that's enough of the features. You can read the specs for yourself elsewhere.

    My point about the Sony dedicated reader is that it does it's job, it's simple job, better than the other readers. It's much like a Un*x program: small, specific, perfect for the job at hand. I want to read a book. I don't want to surf blogs, or play games, or fiddle with facebook. I can do that on my Evo. I can do that on my laptop, or desktop. Hell, I can even do net-based things on my Fios tv-box, now.

    1. Re:Dedicated Readers Doomed? I don't think so by MyMistake · · Score: 1

      "Being able to download (ONLY FROM the vendor's store) over 3G wireless seems like more of a tether, to me. You're locked in..." This is a misconception that I find annoying. I have a Kindle (a gift) and haven't had the 3G on in months. It may be true that Amazon _wants_ me to buy their eBooks, but I don't. I have books from Baen, authors' sites, Guttenberg, and publishers sites on my Kindle. It all became trivial when I found Calibre. "I can shove ~90 gigabytes of books into this thing (at present)." So? 90gigs of eBooks is absurd. I have about a dozen books on the Kindle now, which will last me a couple more months. (Some are books I love and like to have around and some are books I'll read and jettison). For a dedicated reader, built-in ram is usually plenty. Now, using a memory card to load books could be useful... Does the Sony support that? (I really don't know and just thought to wonder about it now, but suddenly I'm curious.) If I were to purchase an eReader, I might go for a Sony, but the Kindle is a really nice device as long as you honor Amazon's phantom lock-in.

  38. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  39. E-Ink vs all other Displays by janerules · · Score: 1

    I have to admit I like the E-Ink. I read on both my HTC Touch and my DSi and personally I kill my eyes. The E-Ink is just like a book, but much more portable. Besides the light of the other displays makes me feel wired at night, and then I can't sleep. http://lifehacker.com/5524849/ban-portable-electronics-before-bed-for-more-restful-sleep

  40. I want one in A3 by dogzdik · · Score: 0
    I want one in A3....

    I want it in colour.

    I want removable ordinary AA batteries.

    I want a plug in adaptor to run it and recharge the batteries.

    I also want a solar panel on the backside,so it becomes self charging when out and about.

    I also want it to be a generic reader that does everything, so I can tell all these proprietary formatters to stick their special lock in lines up their arses.

    I also want to have a 50 year unconditional warranty on it.

    --

    .

    Voting up, Voting down - If I really gave a fuck about your approval or not, I'd come and ask you.

  41. Learn the process by rcharbon · · Score: 1

    I worked at a company that has made this list. We learned that we should rate the company highly - otherwise we had to waste time in meetings discussing how we could improve employee satisfaction.

  42. Oopsie by rcharbon · · Score: 1

    Posted to wrong article :-(