Slashdot Mirror


User: boltar

boltar's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
262
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 262

  1. Re:Okay, so Slash is serious, so now... on Running Weblogs With Slash · · Score: -1, Troll

    Who cares if its complaint with this weeks version of HTML that W3C have vomited up.
    As long as it works.

  2. Re:How about not trying to talk out of your ass??! on On the Subject of OpenGL 2.0 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Aww , poor little boy. Did mommy shout at you when you messed your pants again this morning?
    You really should get potty trained you know.

  3. How about a new version of X windows with OpenGL? on On the Subject of OpenGL 2.0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    X11R6 is old enough now so how about X12 that has OpenGL (and lots of other improvements) build in?
    So Xlib would have it incorporated and it would be much faster than as is done now of building it
    on top of Xlib and extensions.

  4. Re:UHF antenna? Was the big deal? on I STILL Want My HDTV · · Score: 1

    So what did people watch before cable came along then? Or did TV not arrive where you live until
    the 70s?

  5. Re:Luddites coming out of the woodwork on I STILL Want My HDTV · · Score: 1

    In other words you're 14 and the hormones are playing up. Don't worry , you'll get over it.

  6. Re:Luddites coming out of the woodwork on I STILL Want My HDTV · · Score: 1

    Does that translate as "I have no life and I'm pissed off about it but attack is the best form
    of defence" ?

  7. UHF antenna? Was the big deal? on I STILL Want My HDTV · · Score: 1

    "...through the air from your local TV stations' antenna towers. So you have to go buy a UHF antenna and a separate decoder for its signals, to the tune of another couple of hundred dollars."

    Umm , just how many people WOULDN'T have a UHF antenna already?

  8. Re:UK only has widescreen on I STILL Want My HDTV · · Score: 1

    Its not HDTV they broadcast , its Pal Plus which is a widescreen 625 line format which virtually
    no one has a TV for.
    All this does it piss off everyone with a normal TV when they get a semi letterbox picture for no
    reason other than the 2 people and a dog who bought a PAL Plus TV when they were on sale for a
    few weeks back in the mid 90s.

  9. Why does he give a damn about the storyline? on Trouble at Stargate SG-1 · · Score: 1

    Seems a lame excuse to me. After all, the show never has exactly been shakespear so who cares
    what changes in storyline it takes? More likely
    he wanted a payrise, they refused and he left in
    a petulant huff probably thinking (and rightly it seems) that the show wouldn't be the same without
    him.

  10. Re:Daniel Jackson not dead in Britain! on Trouble at Stargate SG-1 · · Score: 1

    Watching Sarah Geller trying to act is painful enough, not sure I could handle listening to her
    attempting to sing too!

  11. Re:Are they nuts? This was Stargate's MAIN CHARACT on Trouble at Stargate SG-1 · · Score: 1

    You might as well that stargate without a transvestite in the lead bad guy part isn't
    stargate either. Whatever merits the character had in the film as fars as I'm concerned he was
    really just making up the numbers in the series. After all , hes the only character where we know
    very little about his personal life, he rarely does anything except get himself into trouble
    he has to be rescued from because of his "scientific curiosity" and frankly his character so rarely shows any emotion beyond
    the 1 dimensional curious-scientist-oblivious-to-danger that he could be quite easily played by
    a plank of wood.

  12. Re:Daniel Jackson not dead in Britain! on Trouble at Stargate SG-1 · · Score: 1

    Course I mean C4. Sky is still only watched by two men and a dog. Besides which strictly speaking
    its a european station , not a UK one.

  13. Daniel Jackson not dead in Britain! on Trouble at Stargate SG-1 · · Score: 1

    At least he was still very much alive at the end of the episode that aired here last sunday so
    I'm not sure where salon.com are getting their info from but their source is a bit suspect.

  14. First story to make Slashdot Slashdotted?? on Kathleen Fent Read This Story · · Score: 1

    Cos its sure as hell is slow here!

  15. Seemed like a good idea at the time on Towards an Internet-Scale Operating System · · Score: 1

    At least I reckon thats the category that this idea will eventually end up in. Why do some people
    always assume that everyone wants to be online the whole time? WHy do they assume that everywhere
    is like america and no one has to pay for local calls to ISPs? And how will effectively turning
    my computer into a vast distributed system benefit me? Great idea if you want to run a
    distributed equivalent of an SIMD parallel machine but pretty useless if you simply want to
    do word processing. Who's going to want to wait
    5 minutes while their WP downloads their document
    from 101 different locations byte by byte over
    a their 56K modem instead of loading it in a few
    seconds off the disk?
    I really feel some academics need to get out of their research labs and take a stroll in the real
    world sometimes.

  16. Re:Burning cash on The Laid-off Techie · · Score: 1, Interesting

    This may come as a shock but not everyone on here is american and so knows about obscure american
    savings plans. Why not tell us all about a TESSA then? What , you've not heard of it? Well maybe
    thats because its British.

  17. More predatots than pray?? on Learning Autonomic Robots · · Score: 0

    Isn't this the wrong way around? In nature you have far more pray animals than predators hence
    you get the pyramid of life. What will doing it their way prove other than the fact that its still
    impossible to emulate nature in the real world (as opposed to enviroment emulation is software).

  18. 1 play only? No problem. on Limited-Use DVD Technology · · Score: 0

    Just video it while you're watching it.

  19. Re:complexity of supercomputers approaching brain on Arguing A.I. · · Score: 0

    I thought it was 100 billion neurons

  20. Re:I wept silently to myself, when I read this. on Running AmigaOS on a PC (The Proper Way) · · Score: 0

    Nice cut & paste. Next time you want to come up with BS try not overdoing it , it doesn't look
    very convincing.

  21. Re:I wept silently to myself, when I read this. on Running AmigaOS on a PC (The Proper Way) · · Score: 0

    The OS got out the way when you wanted it to. Hmm wasn't there another OS that did that ... umm ,
    it was a monitor program now what was it called... oh yeah... DOS.

    As for message passing by reference , so what? If you use shared memory you don't even have to pass
    anything , its just there. BFD.

  22. Re:I wept silently to myself, when I read this. on Running AmigaOS on a PC (The Proper Way) · · Score: 0

    Well since the article is talking about the OS not any special hardware I'll be nice and assume you
    simply didn't bother to read it rather than the fact that perhaps you're just an ass.

    And FYI I use Linux and BSD and have probably forgotten more about operating systems than
    you ever knew sonny. I suggest you can it before you make a complete pillock of yourself.

  23. Re:I wept silently to myself, when I read this. on Running AmigaOS on a PC (The Proper Way) · · Score: 0

    Putting words into my mouth just to shoot them down doesn't do your argument any favours.
    The past teaches us a lot but it doesn't mean we have to live in it. Why would I want to use an
    Amiga for gaming now? Because its got 256 colours and a bit blitter. Oh man, hold me down! Watch
    out NVidia!

    The amiga was good for its day , just like Dolby B and C60 cassettes were but these days I prefer
    to use recordable CD. If you want to keep using your amigas fine, thats your choice but don't expect
    the rest of the world to go back 15 years in time just for the sake of some nostalgia trip.

    And yes I did own one. Sold it years ago.

  24. Re:I wept silently to myself, when I read this. on Running AmigaOS on a PC (The Proper Way) · · Score: 0

    Awesome power in 1986. These days its power is nothing. And that power came from the hardware
    not the OS so frankly apart from the fact that no one really cares anyway anymore why bother porting
    an OS that was good but nothing special?

    Retro reminiscing is all well and good but people should remember that the past is the past, dragging
    it kicking and screaming into the present does no one any favours. What next, a new version of the
    TRS80 OS?

  25. Is this the most pointless waste of time yet? on Animate Your LILO · · Score: 0

    People love to knock MIcrosoft for its bloatware yet here the Linux crowd are cooing over a boot
    loader than can play games. Hello??! Double standards I think people! A boot loader is there
    to boot the OS in the fastest and most efficient way possible, its NOT there to provide eye candy
    for people with the attention span of a knat. If MS had done this with OSLoader you'd all be
    jumping up and down laughing about it but because its LILO its ok isn't it?
    And no I'm not one of the MS sheep, I've been using linux since version 1.1 back in 1995
    probably before half of you even knew what unix was.