Fine: But you don't get to go to bars anymore, you're not allowed to go skiing, play football, or anything else that I deem unnecessary to your life which might raise my group insurance plan rates. Also, you have to wear a helmet outside. This is my polite way of saying fuck you and your flawed philosophy.
"I'm pretty sure Olympic athletes aren't smoking gas station alterna-weeds."
Then you are one naive motherfucker, but then, I expect less of anonymous cowards.
You're confusing the regulation of medicinal drugs/doctors with the regulation of recreational drugs. Two separate issues, two separate vectors of regulation. The first recreational drugs were opium dens banned in San Francisco in the 1800s. This was way before FDA and regulation of snake oil salesmen. Racist "goals" happen first, ones that actually help people happen later.
You directly contradicted yourself in my eyes. "Things should be this way but I'm glad they aren't." Either it is or it isn't. You don't get to choose a quantum superposition of two different opinions on the matter.
"People are not addicted to anything because of genetic predisposition or parenting", said the person with alcoholic parents in a family of genetically-related alcoholics, while ignoring that alcoholism rates are the exact same with monkeys that have access to alcohol as they are with humans, because it is in fact genetically determined.
Before do not call, my landline (same number since 1999) got calls daily. After do not call, I received no more than 5 calls total in the years between then and now. So yea, it worked pretty fucking awesomely.
Sorry, copyright doesn't apply in criminal investigations. Nor should it. Imagine not being able to take a picture of a murder scene because there was a piece of art in the background, and the artist could sue you for unauthorized duplication? Plus, y'know, American law applies to America, not Australia.
You're cherry picking. The religions you describe represent less than 5% of all religious people on the planet. The other 95% are exactly in line with what GP said.
Cherry picking. And Microsoft is not preventing any users from installing other OSes on hardware either. Read the article again. Now try to install something Apple doesn't approve of on an iPhone, iPod - you know, the devices people have a lot more than Macs. You can't without jailbraking it. It is far more restrictive in Apple-land, even with this new change. Microsoft users can still install whatever they want on ALL microsoft products. Apple users never could - unless you go back to the 1990s.
Right, however, if your comment made them want to arrest you tomorrow, they'd simply draw up a warrant for slashdot to give your IP information, and then go to your ISP for your customer information. They'd still probably be there tomorrow, whether you gave your name or not. You're not safer because you didn't give your name unless you're browsing through an anonymizing proxy, and even then there are holes.
I've generally found administrators/managers in enterprises funded by actual capitalism ("profit") to be much better, saner, and smarter, than any administrator/manager in any enterprise funded by tax dollars. Almost scarily so. It's two different worlds.
Slashdot Mirror
Fine: But you don't get to go to bars anymore, you're not allowed to go skiing, play football, or anything else that I deem unnecessary to your life which might raise my group insurance plan rates. Also, you have to wear a helmet outside. This is my polite way of saying fuck you and your flawed philosophy.
Mere possession of weed is not a felony charge. Not unless a state decides for it to be.
"I'm pretty sure Olympic athletes aren't smoking gas station alterna-weeds." Then you are one naive motherfucker, but then, I expect less of anonymous cowards.
"There's far too much to explore", said the man unwilling to explore recreational drugs.
You're confusing the regulation of medicinal drugs/doctors with the regulation of recreational drugs. Two separate issues, two separate vectors of regulation. The first recreational drugs were opium dens banned in San Francisco in the 1800s. This was way before FDA and regulation of snake oil salesmen. Racist "goals" happen first, ones that actually help people happen later.
You directly contradicted yourself in my eyes. "Things should be this way but I'm glad they aren't." Either it is or it isn't. You don't get to choose a quantum superposition of two different opinions on the matter.
"People are not addicted to anything because of genetic predisposition or parenting", said the person with alcoholic parents in a family of genetically-related alcoholics, while ignoring that alcoholism rates are the exact same with monkeys that have access to alcohol as they are with humans, because it is in fact genetically determined.
Before do not call, my landline (same number since 1999) got calls daily. After do not call, I received no more than 5 calls total in the years between then and now. So yea, it worked pretty fucking awesomely.
That is the highest compliment I can possibly receive. Thank you.
I stab myself in a different part of the leg every night to thwart gait-detection.
I also never go to the park, because people might photograph me. I stick to the shadows, and only go out at night, wearing a mask.
Because you don't want to find it in your bed when you wake up the next morning.
Because currently it costs money. Posting this story might drive people to buy their product, even.
It is news. It's an unusual, not-normal occurrence. And it's game related. News for nerds. This is the most interesting thing posted ind ays.
Sorry, copyright doesn't apply in criminal investigations. Nor should it. Imagine not being able to take a picture of a murder scene because there was a piece of art in the background, and the artist could sue you for unauthorized duplication? Plus, y'know, American law applies to America, not Australia.
No it isn't, but congratulations on not only drinking the Kool-Aid, but preaching it. What people in my industry make is quite literally my business.
They didn't take the harddrives, they took the copied files. Understand your enemy.
sick burn!
nice of you to slip a Brazil reference in there ;)
You're cherry picking. The religions you describe represent less than 5% of all religious people on the planet. The other 95% are exactly in line with what GP said.
In that case, Apple is more of a monopoly than Microsoft.
Cherry picking. And Microsoft is not preventing any users from installing other OSes on hardware either. Read the article again. Now try to install something Apple doesn't approve of on an iPhone, iPod - you know, the devices people have a lot more than Macs. You can't without jailbraking it. It is far more restrictive in Apple-land, even with this new change. Microsoft users can still install whatever they want on ALL microsoft products. Apple users never could - unless you go back to the 1990s.
Right, however, if your comment made them want to arrest you tomorrow, they'd simply draw up a warrant for slashdot to give your IP information, and then go to your ISP for your customer information. They'd still probably be there tomorrow, whether you gave your name or not. You're not safer because you didn't give your name unless you're browsing through an anonymizing proxy, and even then there are holes.
I've generally found administrators/managers in enterprises funded by actual capitalism ("profit") to be much better, saner, and smarter, than any administrator/manager in any enterprise funded by tax dollars. Almost scarily so. It's two different worlds.
Kinda sounds like No-True-Scotsman logic to me.