How exactly will using PulseAudio fix bugs that're due to ALSA, when it is also a client of ALSA? Surely if the bugs were in the system, and not the client, then Firefox-on-PulseAudio would be exactly as failsome as Firefox-on-ALSA.
I vote for deluded. There's a hojillion reasons to believe he's fundamentally wrong about his previous predictions, mostly due to his mysticization of both technology and human consciousness.
Is to not knuckle under. The logic is that the party making an extreme threat doesn't have the desire, or even ability, to execute; rather, the threat is supposed to make it so that he gets his way without putting in the effort.
Since the journo coöperated, there'll be no court case. The cops will go on doing exactly this shit until interrupted by the legislature, which PMs will do on pain of being raided -- reluctantly, if at all.
As a security product becomes widely used, even close to ubiquitous, its value to an attacker increases to the point where the NSAs and CIAs of the world will cut the damn thing open with a nano-spoon and read its doubly-secret ROMs with a scanning electron microscope. If the product is closed-source, we only know that the product will eventually be backdoored or defeated by an adversary; and implicitly that it may already have been -- there's no security advantage. If the product is open source, we can additionally review it to determine whether there are backdoors, and gain from others doing so (even if just for props).
But besides being open source, the security firmware should ideally be Free Software as well, and replaceable by the user. Otherwise we can't know what's truly running on there.
We're talking about H1B's here. Imported labour. If their jobs could be offshored, they already would've been: the offshoring job-market favours capital even more than that for indentured brown people.
Some leftie you are, failing even at basic Marxist economics.
A mandatory three-month notice will lead to a standard unwillingness to contract three months out, because by negotiating shorter lead times than this the company will be at a strong advantage in salary negotiation: they know that the applicant is currently on their notice period, or already unemployed, and have no option of staying with their current employer.
This works on those who naïvely apply to only one company at a time, which is most of the "goody two-shoes starts at the bottom level" crowd.
Here we have a well-industrialized country with megacorporations aplenty and relatively free mixing between political and economic power, where yet the judicial and executive branches are at all able (even if unwillingly, forced by the crowds) to take on corruption at the level of the president, and some of the largest megacorporations in the area -- if not the world.
Hats off. I expected this investigation to whitewash anyone with any power.
>It took Alphabet Inc.'s Waymo seven years to design and build a laser-scanning system to guide its self-driving cars. Uber Technologies Inc. allegedly did it in nine months.
I too am able to sit on my hands for six years and three months. Doesn't mean you stole my idea.
>A director shouted a homophobic slur at a subordinate during a heated confrontation in a meeting.
If this is such a major sin by Uber's standards that it's worth mentioning in a slam piece, then Uber must be far cleaner than their business practices would suggest. It's not like undercutting established taxi service with VC money is in any way "innovation", or "disruption" except in the sense of what George Soros likes to do.
I recall "Secure Digital" being a reference to the built-in DRM that SD cards had since day 0, to contrast with e.g. CF cards that were "just" a small form-factor for the ATA/ATAPI protocols. The irony of DRM software not being compatible with a DRM architecture from about 15 years before is, while amusing, nothing out of the norm.
Luckily this also means that TPM-based DRM is also dead in a practical sense.
I asked "exactly", and you answer with handwaving about some other library altogether. I suppose the answer is "it doesn't", then.
How exactly will using PulseAudio fix bugs that're due to ALSA, when it is also a client of ALSA? Surely if the bugs were in the system, and not the client, then Firefox-on-PulseAudio would be exactly as failsome as Firefox-on-ALSA.
The list is not exhaustive. Obviously literal cancer is also cancer.
I vote for deluded. There's a hojillion reasons to believe he's fundamentally wrong about his previous predictions, mostly due to his mysticization of both technology and human consciousness.
Is to not knuckle under. The logic is that the party making an extreme threat doesn't have the desire, or even ability, to execute; rather, the threat is supposed to make it so that he gets his way without putting in the effort.
Since the journo coöperated, there'll be no court case. The cops will go on doing exactly this shit until interrupted by the legislature, which PMs will do on pain of being raided -- reluctantly, if at all.
The lesson: always fight, never give in.
As a security product becomes widely used, even close to ubiquitous, its value to an attacker increases to the point where the NSAs and CIAs of the world will cut the damn thing open with a nano-spoon and read its doubly-secret ROMs with a scanning electron microscope. If the product is closed-source, we only know that the product will eventually be backdoored or defeated by an adversary; and implicitly that it may already have been -- there's no security advantage. If the product is open source, we can additionally review it to determine whether there are backdoors, and gain from others doing so (even if just for props).
But besides being open source, the security firmware should ideally be Free Software as well, and replaceable by the user. Otherwise we can't know what's truly running on there.
And the chocolate rations were increased to twenty grammes per week.
"Time crystals", my jap's eye.
We're talking about H1B's here. Imported labour. If their jobs could be offshored, they already would've been: the offshoring job-market favours capital even more than that for indentured brown people.
Some leftie you are, failing even at basic Marxist economics.
Let's see if this changes the division of income in affected companies to better follow market conditions.
I wouldn't expect too much of a republican administration, in that regard. (nor the other party. let's not make this a pissing match.)
A mandatory three-month notice will lead to a standard unwillingness to contract three months out, because by negotiating shorter lead times than this the company will be at a strong advantage in salary negotiation: they know that the applicant is currently on their notice period, or already unemployed, and have no option of staying with their current employer.
This works on those who naïvely apply to only one company at a time, which is most of the "goody two-shoes starts at the bottom level" crowd.
Thanks for the link.
Here we have a well-industrialized country with megacorporations aplenty and relatively free mixing between political and economic power, where yet the judicial and executive branches are at all able (even if unwillingly, forced by the crowds) to take on corruption at the level of the president, and some of the largest megacorporations in the area -- if not the world.
Hats off. I expected this investigation to whitewash anyone with any power.
We could just wait for people to become stupider than the average IoT doodad. Surely there'll be more than 8B of those by that time.
Point one out, if you can.
>It took Alphabet Inc.'s Waymo seven years to design and build a laser-scanning system to guide its self-driving cars. Uber Technologies Inc. allegedly did it in nine months.
I too am able to sit on my hands for six years and three months. Doesn't mean you stole my idea.
>A director shouted a homophobic slur at a subordinate during a heated confrontation in a meeting.
If this is such a major sin by Uber's standards that it's worth mentioning in a slam piece, then Uber must be far cleaner than their business practices would suggest. It's not like undercutting established taxi service with VC money is in any way "innovation", or "disruption" except in the sense of what George Soros likes to do.
That's also been around for like 20 years now. Still publishing daily.
Came here to post exactly this. It's also been modded to +5 already, so I'll just post this comment to endorse it further.
The simple version is, "that's not what a MMU does at all".
>, which is tasked with improving performance for cache management operations.
Stopped reading right there. These guys have no idea what they're talking about.
I'd have thought that over 80%, not under, could be identified just by what they browse. Mainstream being stereotypically homogenous, and everything.
>I was told that it was part of the background check and wouldn't be used to determine the size of the offer...
If it were used to determine offer size nonetheless, how would you know?
I know exactly what I'm talking about.
FYI, MMC never took off. It was used, at most, in less than five models of the Nokia Communicator, and that's it. Flash was very expensive back then.
I recall "Secure Digital" being a reference to the built-in DRM that SD cards had since day 0, to contrast with e.g. CF cards that were "just" a small form-factor for the ATA/ATAPI protocols. The irony of DRM software not being compatible with a DRM architecture from about 15 years before is, while amusing, nothing out of the norm.
Luckily this also means that TPM-based DRM is also dead in a practical sense.