There are a few reasons one might use the 3K number. For people who believe that that war (in Iraq) was a bad idea (some because it blurred our focus from Afganistan) it is around the same number of people killed on 9/11 (or just in the WTC).
"Being a judge for some horse association has nothing to do with being the head of the emergency management task force. Nothing at all. It in no way reflects ones abilities to do something outside that arena."
You are correct. It should be noted that he drove that previous organization he was running into bankruptcy. So there is a track record of incompetance and mismanagement that should have been visable and indicative of his management style.
Ignoring his monumental incompetance and the fact he was placed there because it was a political favor. I agree with the rest of what you say about planning and doing.
"Judges and Horses Commissioner for the International Arabian Horse Association."
Dont forget that Mr. Brown drove that organization to bankruptcy when he was screwing it up.
Re:Weight loss thru exercise alone is a fallacy
on
Treadmill Workstation
·
· Score: 1
From my exposure to Atkins book and related materials the basic tennant seemed to be "Engage ketosis and do not consume so many carbs that you leave that state".
It looks to me our views on how exactly to achieve that is where the difference is?
" I know what ketosis is. If you are not in a state of ketosis your metabolism does things different. Either way you get it, glucose is a carbohydrate and to live your brain needs it.
My snippet points out how your body will manufacture all the glucose you need. An idiot can see that this (or something very like to it) is true, because otherwise a starving man's body would be depleted of glucose within 48 hours, and their brain would stop functioning. Since you can actually live up to a week without even taking on water, we know that this is not the case."
I think you have failed to comprehend what I was saying. I never said you run out of glucose in 48 hours and die. I said that people not doing ketosis will get the fuel for brain function from a different metabolic method.
From Wikipedia "The brain gets its energy from ketone bodies when insufficient glucose is available (e.g. when fasting). In the event of low blood glucose, most other tissues have additional energy sources besides ketone bodies (such as fatty acids) but the brain does not. After the diet has been changed to lower blood glucose for 3 days, the brain gets 30% of its energy from ketone bodies. After 4 days, this goes up to 70% (during the initial stages the brain does not burn ketones, since they are an important substrate for lipid synthesis in the brain). The brain retains some need for glucose, because ketone bodies can be broken down for energy only in the mitochondria, and brain cells' long thin axons are too far from mitochondria."
What I said was the brian needs carbohydrates. Glucose is the carbohydrate the brain uses. Even in Ketosis you need a small amount of glucose for proper brain function.
What is the "ridiculous assertion" in that?
Re:Weight loss thru exercise alone is a fallacy
on
Treadmill Workstation
·
· Score: 1
" The point I am making is that under Atkins you need to eat a small amount of carbohydrates in your diet. If you are not doing Atkins, please stop causing confusion by referancing it.
First, again, I don't agree that this is true."
It's what the diet tells you to do. Take it up with the Atkins estate (20 grams of net carbs per day max during induction as I remember).
Can you please explain what your diet is (it appears to not be strict Atkins) and why you come across as radical anti-carbohydrate?
I know what ketosis is. If you are not in a state of ketosis your metabolism does things different. Either way you get it, glucose is a carbohydrate and to live your brain needs it.
"It's when you combine fat and carbs that you start to have problems" Can you give me some specific "problems" please? You just hang it as an ominous threat without specifying anything or actually giving something to discuss.
If you know how the human body metabolizes food, fats work to slow digestions of carbs and lower the effective glycemic index of carbohydrates (among other things). I can't put it more simply then that. If you do not care about glycemic load or index, that's fine, but those are important factors for people who want to control blood sugar spikes or dips (diabetics need to be aware of both). I do know the difference between ketosis and ketoadicosis (something diabetics have to be aware of since it can kill).
I feel as I am not entirely clear as to your point of view and I feel it would help matters if you could clarify. I feel you are putting words/ideas you want to fight against in my mouth and arguing against them rather then what I actually say/think.
I get the impression you are an Atkins crusader (who is right no matter what) who is against all carbohydrates. Is this correct? If not can you clarify your views/stance? I think that a misunderstanding of each others viewpoint is a part of our communication issue here.
I read the article you reference, and I do not see any thing significant I disagree with (since 2002 science has advanced out understanding of some issues talked about in that). What exactly did you think I was arguing? What were you expecting me to "debunk" from that article? I certainly do not believe that people should not eat fat. I mentioned that you should get 30-40 percent of your calories from fat (depending on dietary goals). Is that too "low fat" for your worldview? I never said fat raises your cholesterol.
I disagree with you that cholesterol intake has no ability to increase levels in your blood. Can you back that claim up?
Re:Weight loss thru exercise alone is a fallacy
on
Treadmill Workstation
·
· Score: 1
The point I am making is that under Atkins you need to eat a small amount of carbohydrates in your diet. If you are not doing Atkins, please stop causing confusion by referancing it.
I dont think you are doing kitosis right if you have completely stopped all carb intake.
I stand by my statement that your brain does need carbohydrates to live. Glucose is a carbohydrate (thus you need carbohydrates for your brain to live). Glycolysis literally means "sweet dissolution".
When you eat carbohydrates this is what happens: Some of glucose goes directly to fuel brain cells and erythrocytes, while the rest makes its way to the liver and muscles, where it is stored as glycogen, and to fat cells, where it can be used to power reactions which synthesize some fats. Glycogen is the body's auxiliary energy source, tapped and converted back into glucose when there is need for energy.
If you dont have the needed glucose, yes your body will get what it needs by breaking down fats and in some cases muscle.
From the atkinss FAQ.
The body can only store a two-day supply of glucose in the form of glycogen when consuming 20 grams of carbs a day, it normally takes two to three days for your body to go into Ketosis.
Atkins is not an all protein diet. Much of the news media have portrayed Atkins as an all meat and cheese diet which is simply untrue. It's best to stay away from starchy vegetables such as beets, potatoes and carrots. During the Induction phase, you'll eat three cups of certain vegetables each day, primarily salad greens and other raw salad ingredients. During the other phases of the diet you gradually increase the amount of vegetables in your diet.
Were those egg whites? I ask because I cant imagine how bad your diet was that this actually managed to lower your cholesterol into a better range.
Re:Weight loss thru exercise alone is a fallacy
on
Treadmill Workstation
·
· Score: 1
Carb. + fat problem?
That's the best thing to do if you are eating a balanced diet. You need some fats to slow the uptake of carbohydrates (also helps even out the spike from High GI foods) and absorb vitamins (the ones that are fat soluble). Everything has its place in a healthy diet. Your brain needs carbohydrates to live. It is healthy to get fats, carbohydrates (log and hi GI) as well as a good amount of protein. The typical ratio is 30% fat 30% carbs, 40% protein but that can be adjusted within reasonable amounts depending on your goal.
If you eat too much of anything it can be bad for you. If you only ate carbs you wouldnt be able to maintain muscle or absorb fat soluable vitamins. That does not mean you should cut all carbs out of your meals. Same goes for fats. High protein is what the atkins plan shoots for (but there are stil carbs and fat).
As for vegetarians, I don't know any that fit your description. Maybe you are talking about those nuttier vegans, or the ones who don't eat anything that casts a shadow.
The original 2004 articles (See eweek article from back then) use the same quote from Ballmer about "last summer". I think there has been some strange glitch in the matrix where for a brief moment all the news agencies were in 2004 again.
Maybe people in America would be less obese if they mowed their own lawns once every week or two. It's not like it takes a PHD to operate a lawnmower/edge trimmer.
Besides gardening is good for you emotionally and physically.
Maybe Metallica can put out a song talking about the troubles they face due to unrestricted tablature sharing. Something to the Tune of "Sad but True" maybe call it "Tablature".
That quote loses most of it's impact IMO unless you are hearing it as it was delivered. Just reading the words gives you the idea, remembering how it was delivered (for those who have seen it) or hearing it gives it much more life.
I dont believe that logic, it just seemed like a question to ask, because someone will think about that at some point. Problems dont always go away entirely. Often they just move to another location where it's easier for them.
You wouldnt be responsable for that break in, but you should have banded together as a community and put up beware of dog signs so that people in that rival town are better looking targets.
I am entirely not being serious about this, but I did want to comment on how just because something stops being a problem (crime for well armed people) does not mean that the problem does not exist any more.
Don't restrict it to just patents that might have something to do with OSS. I think Microsoft deserves every patent they hold to be scrutinized and if prior art exists exposed for the fraud it is.
Sometimes people just dont learn until they end up in a bad situation.
Especially because Macrovision (as an example) does not magically vanish from the work after copyright protection ends. Does the DMCA have any rule for breaking DRM to access a work that has entered the public domain?
I know I got a GPL notice page with my TV last year (XBR tube model). It takes about 5 seconds to boot up and aparently uses a small linux distro to handle the on-screen menus and such.
Since this will add forfiture to the mix (and back doors forfiture into the DMCA) I predict they will vigourously enforce it. With forfiture (as seen in the war on drugs) even if you are innocent your stuff/property is long gone and sold before the courts say "my bad" and you are left with nothing.
Slashdot Mirror
There are a few reasons one might use the 3K number. For people who believe that that war (in Iraq) was a bad idea (some because it blurred our focus from Afganistan) it is around the same number of people killed on 9/11 (or just in the WTC).
"Being a judge for some horse association has nothing to do with being the head of the emergency management task force. Nothing at all. It in no way reflects ones abilities to do something outside that arena."
You are correct. It should be noted that he drove that previous organization he was running into bankruptcy. So there is a track record of incompetance and mismanagement that should have been visable and indicative of his management style.
Ignoring his monumental incompetance and the fact he was placed there because it was a political favor. I agree with the rest of what you say about planning and doing.
"Judges and Horses Commissioner for the International Arabian Horse Association."
Dont forget that Mr. Brown drove that organization to bankruptcy when he was screwing it up.
From my exposure to Atkins book and related materials the basic tennant seemed to be "Engage ketosis and do not consume so many carbs that you leave that state".
It looks to me our views on how exactly to achieve that is where the difference is?
" I know what ketosis is. If you are not in a state of ketosis your metabolism does things different. Either way you get it, glucose is a carbohydrate and to live your brain needs it.
My snippet points out how your body will manufacture all the glucose you need. An idiot can see that this (or something very like to it) is true, because otherwise a starving man's body would be depleted of glucose within 48 hours, and their brain would stop functioning. Since you can actually live up to a week without even taking on water, we know that this is not the case."
I think you have failed to comprehend what I was saying.
I never said you run out of glucose in 48 hours and die. I said that people not doing ketosis will get the fuel for brain function from a different metabolic method.
From Wikipedia
"The brain gets its energy from ketone bodies when insufficient glucose is available (e.g. when fasting). In the event of low blood glucose, most other tissues have additional energy sources besides ketone bodies (such as fatty acids) but the brain does not. After the diet has been changed to lower blood glucose for 3 days, the brain gets 30% of its energy from ketone bodies. After 4 days, this goes up to 70% (during the initial stages the brain does not burn ketones, since they are an important substrate for lipid synthesis in the brain). The brain retains some need for glucose, because ketone bodies can be broken down for energy only in the mitochondria, and brain cells' long thin axons are too far from mitochondria."
What I said was the brian needs carbohydrates. Glucose is the carbohydrate the brain uses. Even in Ketosis you need a small amount of glucose for proper brain function.
What is the "ridiculous assertion" in that?
" The point I am making is that under Atkins you need to eat a small amount of carbohydrates in your diet. If you are not doing Atkins, please stop causing confusion by referancing it.
First, again, I don't agree that this is true."
It's what the diet tells you to do. Take it up with the Atkins estate (20 grams of net carbs per day max during induction as I remember).
Can you please explain what your diet is (it appears to not be strict Atkins) and why you come across as radical anti-carbohydrate?
I know what ketosis is. If you are not in a state of ketosis your metabolism does things different. Either way you get it, glucose is a carbohydrate and to live your brain needs it.
"It's when you combine fat and carbs that you start to have problems"
Can you give me some specific "problems" please? You just hang it as an ominous threat without specifying anything or actually giving something to discuss.
If you know how the human body metabolizes food, fats work to slow digestions of carbs and lower the effective glycemic index of carbohydrates (among other things). I can't put it more simply then that. If you do not care about glycemic load or index, that's fine, but those are important factors for people who want to control blood sugar spikes or dips (diabetics need to be aware of both). I do know the difference between ketosis and ketoadicosis (something diabetics have to be aware of since it can kill).
I feel as I am not entirely clear as to your point of view and I feel it would help matters if you could clarify. I feel you are putting words/ideas you want to fight against in my mouth and arguing against them rather then what I actually say/think.
I get the impression you are an Atkins crusader (who is right no matter what) who is against all carbohydrates. Is this correct? If not can you clarify your views/stance? I think that a misunderstanding of each others viewpoint is a part of our communication issue here.
I read the article you reference, and I do not see any thing significant I disagree with (since 2002 science has advanced out understanding of some issues talked about in that). What exactly did you think I was arguing? What were you expecting me to "debunk" from that article? I certainly do not believe that people should not eat fat. I mentioned that you should get 30-40 percent of your calories from fat (depending on dietary goals). Is that too "low fat" for your worldview? I never said fat raises your cholesterol.
I disagree with you that cholesterol intake has no ability to increase levels in your blood. Can you back that claim up?
The point I am making is that under Atkins you need to eat a small amount of carbohydrates in your diet. If you are not doing Atkins, please stop causing confusion by referancing it.
I dont think you are doing kitosis right if you have completely stopped all carb intake.
I stand by my statement that your brain does need carbohydrates to live. Glucose is a carbohydrate (thus you need carbohydrates for your brain to live). Glycolysis literally means "sweet dissolution".
When you eat carbohydrates this is what happens: Some of glucose goes directly to fuel brain cells and erythrocytes, while the rest makes its way to the liver and muscles, where it is stored as glycogen, and to fat cells, where it can be used to power reactions which synthesize some fats. Glycogen is the body's auxiliary energy source, tapped and converted back into glucose when there is need for energy.
If you dont have the needed glucose, yes your body will get what it needs by breaking down fats and in some cases muscle.
From the atkinss FAQ.
The body can only store a two-day supply of glucose in the form of glycogen when consuming 20 grams of carbs a day, it normally takes two to three days for your body to go into Ketosis.
Atkins is not an all protein diet. Much of the news media have portrayed Atkins as an all meat and cheese diet which is simply untrue. It's best to stay away from starchy vegetables such as beets, potatoes and carrots. During the Induction phase, you'll eat three cups of certain vegetables each day, primarily salad greens and other raw salad ingredients. During the other phases of the diet you gradually increase the amount of vegetables in your diet.
With our new thoughcrime legislation, maybe he was thinking about selling copyrighted videos of underaged hookers to people with weak hearts.
Were those egg whites? I ask because I cant imagine how bad your diet was that this actually managed to lower your cholesterol into a better range.
Carb. + fat problem?
That's the best thing to do if you are eating a balanced diet. You need some fats to slow the uptake of carbohydrates (also helps even out the spike from High GI foods) and absorb vitamins (the ones that are fat soluble). Everything has its place in a healthy diet. Your brain needs carbohydrates to live. It is healthy to get fats, carbohydrates (log and hi GI) as well as a good amount of protein. The typical ratio is 30% fat 30% carbs, 40% protein but that can be adjusted within reasonable amounts depending on your goal.
If you eat too much of anything it can be bad for you. If you only ate carbs you wouldnt be able to maintain muscle or absorb fat soluable vitamins. That does not mean you should cut all carbs out of your meals. Same goes for fats. High protein is what the atkins plan shoots for (but there are stil carbs and fat).
As for vegetarians, I don't know any that fit your description. Maybe you are talking about those nuttier vegans, or the ones who don't eat anything that casts a shadow.
Please refrain from giving bad health advice out.
Makes me think of Propcycle from the arcades.
Try it as your only form of transport in the backwoods of a mountainous state and you will learn otherwise.
Something is going on. An article from today also is giving me a 404. Cant find the link for it any more either.
How does this apply to Die Fledermaus. AFAIK it means "The Flutter-mouse" AKA "The Bat". It seems singular when presented to us in english at least.
Sony televisions use Linux. I got a GPL notice page with the one I bought last year.
The original 2004 articles (See eweek article from back then) use the same quote from Ballmer about "last summer". I think there has been some strange glitch in the matrix where for a brief moment all the news agencies were in 2004 again.
Maybe people in America would be less obese if they mowed their own lawns once every week or two. It's not like it takes a PHD to operate a lawnmower/edge trimmer.
Besides gardening is good for you emotionally and physically.
Maybe Metallica can put out a song talking about the troubles they face due to unrestricted tablature sharing. Something to the Tune of "Sad but True" maybe call it "Tablature".
I can see it now...
That quote loses most of it's impact IMO unless you are hearing it as it was delivered. Just reading the words gives you the idea, remembering how it was delivered (for those who have seen it) or hearing it gives it much more life.
I dont believe that logic, it just seemed like a question to ask, because someone will think about that at some point. Problems dont always go away entirely. Often they just move to another location where it's easier for them.
You wouldnt be responsable for that break in, but you should have banded together as a community and put up beware of dog signs so that people in that rival town are better looking targets.
I am entirely not being serious about this, but I did want to comment on how just because something stops being a problem (crime for well armed people) does not mean that the problem does not exist any more.
Don't restrict it to just patents that might have something to do with OSS. I think Microsoft deserves every patent they hold to be scrutinized and if prior art exists exposed for the fraud it is.
Sometimes people just dont learn until they end up in a bad situation.
Especially because Macrovision (as an example) does not magically vanish from the work after copyright protection ends. Does the DMCA have any rule for breaking DRM to access a work that has entered the public domain?
I know I got a GPL notice page with my TV last year (XBR tube model). It takes about 5 seconds to boot up and aparently uses a small linux distro to handle the on-screen menus and such.
Since this will add forfiture to the mix (and back doors forfiture into the DMCA) I predict they will vigourously enforce it. With forfiture (as seen in the war on drugs) even if you are innocent your stuff/property is long gone and sold before the courts say "my bad" and you are left with nothing.
I don't remember that story but I do remember one called "The Melancholy Elephants" about a time when copyright never expires.