I even admitted that my weakness was something that was quite important to the job. But I was able to demonstrate during the interview that it was nothing for them to be worried about.
I admitted that my herion addiction was like a crazed monkey on my back. Luckily, I was clumsy and broke the needle, thus proving that there was no need to worry about about my ragin' cravin'.:)
hey there cat... we argued before... hope it doesn't happen again...:)
many programs for "noraml" users _are_ limited by tight loops. look to the wikipedia for info on big-o noataion.
think about a VPN or router vendor that needs to route traffic for users. for each user, we must route each packet O(n).
now think of a firewall vendor. we must route each packet after checking it against this set of deny or allow rules. this is a common case.. but represents an O(n^2).
now O(n^2) can be "ok" for small n... and perhaps the "bugs" you talk about are poorly designed rule lookups. Now imagine a large ISP that uses a firewall to block virus' from being sent outbound. this is still O(n^2), but the n can be huge, and that loop is executed for each packet... also a huge number. hard to optimize. it usually takes a shift in philiosophy to break out of this kind of case. say, come up with a way that we don't have to check every deny/allow rule for each connection and you have beat it.
oh.. and i'm drunk... so excuse the spelling... por favor.
yikes... yes, december 31 is part of december. no, i didn't realize cooker and snapshots were different. and even if i had, i didn't read the full snapshots page.
me: that is a 2.6-test kernel... not the same thing as the 2.6 kernel itself.
you: You are provably wrong. Where are you taking your information from?
no.. really... 2.6 is not the same as 2.6-test. prove me wrong. please.
parent and you: provides Linux 2.6 as kernel default since december
That is the line I was talking about. Using the parent's citation at cooker snapshot, I can show that indeed, he was talking about 2.6 being there when his citation said 2.6-test.
From that page:
- content: 1 ISO image with Linux 2.6.0-test1, XFree 4.4pre, Gcc 3.3.2 and KDE 3.2pre.
Again, for the hard of hearing.... 2.6-test is not the same as the full 2.6 kernel.
Try not to be such a condescending prick when you are wrong, or confused about the topic.
I think you mean, on the surface of the klein bottle. A surface, has no "inside". But hey... you can buy your own and put the turbine any where you want:).
Then again, from the humblest of beginnings, Linus' kernel project and RMS's GNU initiatives have taken a significant market share away from the world's largest company.
We've stolen markt share from Wal-Mart? I didn't even know cheap plastic stuff was part of the OSS movement. I still learn something new everyday.
Slashdot Mirror
general methods for surviving computer science courses for new students?
love it or leave it.
I even admitted that my weakness was something that was quite important to the job. But I was able to demonstrate during the interview that it was nothing for them to be worried about.
:)
I admitted that my herion addiction was like a crazed monkey on my back. Luckily, I was clumsy and broke the needle, thus proving that there was no need to worry about about my ragin' cravin'.
because without honor victory is anti-climactic, to say the least.
and if I'm not in the stone working industry... what group to join then :)
hell.. I'll crawl under your non-raised floors checking cables for $10,000.
hey there cat... we argued before... hope it doesn't happen again... :)
many programs for "noraml" users _are_ limited by tight loops. look to the wikipedia for info on big-o noataion.
think about a VPN or router vendor that needs to route traffic for users. for each user, we must route each packet O(n).
now think of a firewall vendor. we must route each packet after checking it against this set of deny or allow rules. this is a common case.. but represents an O(n^2).
now O(n^2) can be "ok" for small n... and perhaps the "bugs" you talk about are poorly designed rule lookups. Now imagine a large ISP that uses a firewall to block virus' from being sent outbound. this is still O(n^2), but the n can be huge, and that loop is executed for each packet... also a huge number. hard to optimize. it usually takes a shift in philiosophy to break out of this kind of case. say, come up with a way that we don't have to check every deny/allow rule for each connection and you have beat it.
oh.. and i'm drunk... so excuse the spelling... por favor.
Chris Spheeris? that sexy guy that plays bad music?
found here
wow.... gotta visit you.
hey now... you're trying to move in on my territory :)
ask me to write a plugin to perl's NetworkInfo-Discovery?
retardedness is rarely noted so tactfully. gracias.
thanks... makes much more sense.... didn't think about memory mappping files.
damn. let me use links... damn slash spaces:
compare
this search
with this post
check out http://www.google.com/search?q=Python+would+be+a+r etrograde+choice.&sourceid=mozilla-search&start=0& start=0&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8
c id=8034 340
and compare with:
http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=93598&
mike seems to be a habitual copier. marked as foe very soon.
+1 insightful.
maybe I'm retarded... probably, as a matter of fact. Why would a person want more address space than usable memory?
no... he's saying x and y are similar to most people. y is the accurate term, but I'll use x since it relates better to my audience's world.
most executives I've known would fit that demo.
yikes... yes, december 31 is part of december. no, i didn't realize cooker and snapshots were different. and even if i had, i didn't read the full snapshots page.
apology given, prick comment withdrawn.
ahem.... sufficiently offtopic now.
no.. really... 2.6 is not the same as 2.6-test. prove me wrong. please.
That is the line I was talking about. Using the parent's citation at cooker snapshot, I can show that indeed, he was talking about 2.6 being there when his citation said 2.6-test.
From that page:
Again, for the hard of hearing.... 2.6-test is not the same as the full 2.6 kernel.
Try not to be such a condescending prick when you are wrong, or confused about the topic.
that is a 2.6-test kernel... not the same thing as the 2.6 kernel itself.
when you squirt liquids out your nose, people will laugh with you... when you squirt solids out your nose, they will laugh at you.
I think you mean, on the surface of the klein bottle. A surface, has no "inside". But hey... you can buy your own and put the turbine any where you want :).
now that's funny... I've never used lube during development.
hell, neither of them are numbers. window's calculator just coems up with "OE...barf".
Then again, from the humblest of beginnings, Linus' kernel project and RMS's GNU initiatives have taken a significant market share away from the world's largest company.
We've stolen markt share from Wal-Mart? I didn't even know cheap plastic stuff was part of the OSS movement. I still learn something new everyday.