Anyway...my wife and I thought about something like this over a year ago and were really excited about the idea, but didn't know where to start and didn't follow through with it. I'm glad someone else did:)
You're GLAD someone else did? I would have kicked myself for not getting a patent!
So I point out that you made an error in your argument by quoting the wrong part of the post, and you retaliate by calling me a "mac loser" posting as an anonymous coward?
Brilliant!
I love slashdot!
Next you'll find a grammar error that I've made and harp on that.
It seems on the show that you guys are annoyed by fans requesting revisits. I know thats probably just acting, and if you really WERE annoyed you wouldn't actually DO the revisits. Anyway, my question is: who decides whether or not to revisit a myth? Is it you guys, the producers, or both? Has there ever been a myth you would have liked to revisit that never got any notice from the fans?
The only way I found to win a game during Black and White 1 was to toss my creature's poop at the opposing side's food supply. As soon as you landed one in there, game over!
Obviously we should adopt a "Jack Thompson" scheme. This is where the rating is replaced with a letter representing which social outcast the game turns you into.
For instance, Grand Theft Auto would be rated "CK" for Cop Killer. Sims 2 would simply be rated "P" for Pedophile. Seeing how Doom 3 is a murder simulator, it would obviously get an "M" rating. Lego Starwars would be rated "W" for Whore. Why? Well because P for Prostitute was already taken!
Anybody else remember when Microsoft said that the next version of Office was going to be a webpage where people would log in and basically "rent" the app instead of putting the app on their computer and buying it? They called it Office.NET (it was back before.NET was the framework. They had grand plans of slapping.NET at the end of all their software.) Office.NET turned into Office 2003 and the.NET moniker turned into their new framework.
And now we finally have office apps in webpages. And not by Microsoft.;)
Based on what I've seen on Twilight Princess, I can't see it being a cartoon game. Killing monsters from a horse and turning into a werewolf doesn't quite say "cartoon" to me. Similarly, I can't see "realistic link" boarding a little sailboat and sailing around the world.
So because Rockstar has a scandal they should stop advertising their game? I'm not quite following that logic. I don't think anyone who actually buys and plays the game will be insulted enough to sue when they find out there is a sex game in it. The people who are insulted about the game aren't the ones that play it.
Slashdot Mirror
Anyway...my wife and I thought about something like this over a year ago and were really excited about the idea, but didn't know where to start and didn't follow through with it. I'm glad someone else did :)
You're GLAD someone else did? I would have kicked myself for not getting a patent!
Yup! Because the Asteroid rumors were spot on! :P
So I point out that you made an error in your argument by quoting the wrong part of the post, and you retaliate by calling me a "mac loser" posting as an anonymous coward?
Brilliant!
I love slashdot!
Next you'll find a grammar error that I've made and harp on that.
Right.
Quartz has nothing to do with networking.
Try again.
Don't use quotes around phrases that aren't actually quotes.
... he said they were similar.
Nowhere in his post did he say "pretty much the same architecture"
He's failed his mission PLENTY of times with me controlling him already.
It seems on the show that you guys are annoyed by fans requesting revisits. I know thats probably just acting, and if you really WERE annoyed you wouldn't actually DO the revisits. Anyway, my question is: who decides whether or not to revisit a myth? Is it you guys, the producers, or both? Has there ever been a myth you would have liked to revisit that never got any notice from the fans?
Most of the first run games will probably be developed based on the engine of the single-threaded previous sequel.
Never got around to playing it over the internet. Actually I never got around to playing it after I had it for a week either.
The only way I found to win a game during Black and White 1 was to toss my creature's poop at the opposing side's food supply. As soon as you landed one in there, game over!
Obviously we should adopt a "Jack Thompson" scheme. This is where the rating is replaced with a letter representing which social outcast the game turns you into.
For instance, Grand Theft Auto would be rated "CK" for Cop Killer.
Sims 2 would simply be rated "P" for Pedophile.
Seeing how Doom 3 is a murder simulator, it would obviously get an "M" rating.
Lego Starwars would be rated "W" for Whore. Why? Well because P for Prostitute was already taken!
Duh, thats what the iVideo store will be for.
So put ads in your article, that way they come out with the feed.
Anybody else remember when Microsoft said that the next version of Office was going to be a webpage where people would log in and basically "rent" the app instead of putting the app on their computer and buying it? They called it Office.NET (it was back before .NET was the framework. They had grand plans of slapping .NET at the end of all their software.) Office.NET turned into Office 2003 and the .NET moniker turned into their new framework.
;)
And now we finally have office apps in webpages. And not by Microsoft.
Whoa guys! Welcome to 1999!
Based on what I've seen on Twilight Princess, I can't see it being a cartoon game. Killing monsters from a horse and turning into a werewolf doesn't quite say "cartoon" to me. Similarly, I can't see "realistic link" boarding a little sailboat and sailing around the world.
Don't know if you can do it in linux, but Apple calls that "Column view"
... which would be what the majority of Apple users run.
Sure, Mac OS was a lot prettier but then it cost the moon and the stars along with both your arms and legs.
:P
You get what you pay for.
*yawn* old news.
I wouldn't call it a "failed marketing scheme"... its more of a "damn successful marketing scheme."
So a better upgrade for the GBA:SP is.... the Micro? Now THAT is a significantly smaller screen.
So because Rockstar has a scandal they should stop advertising their game? I'm not quite following that logic. I don't think anyone who actually buys and plays the game will be insulted enough to sue when they find out there is a sex game in it. The people who are insulted about the game aren't the ones that play it.
Props to you for having the balls to post that link using your username. ;)
Microsoft should buy whoever made Bonzai Buddy (or whatever that purple guy was called.) The integration of that and Clippy would be revolutionary.