And yet Article 1, Section 9 makes no distinction between civil and criminal. How did the 'precedent' (pronounced 'bullshit') get set that this only refers to criminal issues?
If what he said is true, then this is yet another (out of many) example of the courts 'creatively interpreting' (in other words, modifying it with invisible ink) the constitution.
Sure, it's a wikipedia link, but it's trivial to verify.
Losing Eich is going to be the worst thing to ever happen to Mozilla, mark my words.
How is losing someone that thinks 20% of his employees are subhuman not a good thing? He hates his gay employees. He publicly admitted he is a Nazi that wants to steal their rights. He gave money to a cause that attacks them. Unless you are one of them, how can you defend his kind? Hopefully it won't be that many decades before society has progressed enough to put your kind behind bars to protect the rest of us from your intolerance.
20%? Got a citation for that, or just wishful thinking?
And yet Article 1, Section 9 makes no distinction between civil and criminal. How did the 'precedent' (pronounced 'bullshit') get set that this only refers to criminal issues?
BTW, can you be jailed for failing to pay the IRS? Makes me wonder how 'civil' that infraction is then...
A lateral transfer can be considered coercive or a dismissal in many instances. Off the top of my head, if you move an employee from position A to position B because he is unavailable one weekend per month due to guard duty, position B must have the same pay, status, and potential for advancement as position A.
I've no idea if similar thinking applies in this case.
Slashdot Mirror
And yet Article 1, Section 9 makes no distinction between civil and criminal. How did the 'precedent' (pronounced 'bullshit') get set that this only refers to criminal issues?
If what he said is true, then this is yet another (out of many) example of the courts 'creatively interpreting' (in other words, modifying it with invisible ink) the constitution.
Sure, it's a wikipedia link, but it's trivial to verify.
The underlying offense is the same. The law is written to play legalistic games.
Losing Eich is going to be the worst thing to ever happen to Mozilla, mark my words.
How is losing someone that thinks 20% of his employees are subhuman not a good thing? He hates his gay employees. He publicly admitted he is a Nazi that wants to steal their rights. He gave money to a cause that attacks them. Unless you are one of them, how can you defend his kind? Hopefully it won't be that many decades before society has progressed enough to put your kind behind bars to protect the rest of us from your intolerance.
20%? Got a citation for that, or just wishful thinking?
And yet Article 1, Section 9 makes no distinction between civil and criminal. How did the 'precedent' (pronounced 'bullshit') get set that this only refers to criminal issues?
BTW, can you be jailed for failing to pay the IRS? Makes me wonder how 'civil' that infraction is then...
Could you primitive screwheads stop dropping quotes?
Agreed. That Spanish Inquisitor fellow never could do anything right.
Did somebody say "the Spanish Inquisition"?
"Except when governments are involved"
Get out of the basement. Read more widely. Go enjoy some clean, unlimited tap-water. And marvel at the magical process that keeps it that way.
It's pretty clear that someone with that kneejerk response would only be interested in rainwater and grain alcohol, Mandrake.
Hey, you hurt my feelings. I thought I always got a hat tip in the 'known and admitted trolls' category.
Torture an animal long enough and it will bite you. Humans are no different, we're just better at it.
The biting or the torturing?
If stem cells can make Christopher Reeve walk again, they're a helluva lot more powerful than anybody ever thought.
So how does your tech-illiterate mother watch the ball game on your setup?
She's too busy in the kitchen heating him up some hot pockets to worry about tv.
Oh, I forgot to end with "You damned dirty apes!"
Double sad, given the Heston reference in the summary.
So if one of your employees makes a contribution to the New Black Panther Party, you can't fire them for being the type you don't want around?
I don't know. You tell me.
Are there any numbers available to support this, or was it just a bunch of vocal people who claimed they were uninstalling Firefox?
A lateral transfer can be considered coercive or a dismissal in many instances. Off the top of my head, if you move an employee from position A to position B because he is unavailable one weekend per month due to guard duty, position B must have the same pay, status, and potential for advancement as position A.
I've no idea if similar thinking applies in this case.
Sorry your circles are not in the know but frankly your sample seems to be a bit off from the whole.
Whereas yours is perfectly representative?
Appeal to authority. -eleventy billion Internet debating points.
Doesn't apply to me. Perhaps because I don't skim articles and read the entire thing.
You're on the wrong site.
Go look at the number of comments under this or most of his stories, and you will have found your answer.
I also believe that 99.99% of U.S. cops are honest.
I bet you also expect a visit from the Easter Bunny here shortly.
I bet you're a real hit at parties.
the latter's hybrids seem to be doing quite well at the moment (in Formula 1)
I wouldn't call KERS a 'hybrid' in the same sense of the word as used in context with the Prius.
Nor would I consider much F1 tech to be relevant to street driven autos.
In an unrelated story, there are no guilty men in jail.
Again confirming the postulate that being a vegan makes you an asshole.
Concentrate on the elephant in the room
That would need one heck of a lot of marinade...
That's why he said to concentrate it.