I can think of at least one obvious situation where one's face would be shown to others by 2K. You're playing with them over the internet and they need to see your character.
And with indefinite storage, you don't have to rescan your face when NBA 2K17 comes out.
To me, it doesn't sound like some sketchy privacy infringement, it sounds like a functional necessity for a pretty cool feature.
Get pissed off that I don't have authority over things that masquerade as medicine but somehow don't have to meet any of the standards for medicine or even do anything at all. Then I'd try to figure out how I could define them as food instead, and then regulate them out of existence.
To make up for what I assume they forgot to put on the inside of the back cover? Or do people just need to wrap some around the cable? What obvious and standard part of a monitor or cable did they forget?
I sure wouldn't subscribe if it was for personal use. Though the only time I ever did buy office for personal use I was a student, and got a hefty discount.
I'm saying the statement was presented to you with the context entirely replaced by people with an interest in harming the speaker. As for your list, you could have gotten that from James Carville. That was his playbook when he was working for Bill Clinton. He was so effective that it became the dominant strategy for dealing with opposition to Democrats.
Opinions are perceptions of or judgements about information, so yes. Rational people can make differing judgements and hold differing views without having relied on anything other than reason to arrive at them. Were that not the case, politics wouldn't exist.
I have heard many definitions of "fact" and/or "truth". That is not one of them.
You aren't speaking from a place of reason, but of pure emotion. Your use of language demonstrates this clearly. Rage and reason are incompatible - you cannot be rational when enraged and you are using the language of rage.
Take a few deep breaths and calm down. Forget how much hate you have for Trump (hate blinds) and read a transcript of the interview. Pretend you're trying to wade through spaghetti code, it'll help keep activity in the rational regions of your brain and tone down emotional responses.
Except that she explained what she meant on the spot, and that's not what she said. She discussed the facts she was referring to while dealing with a very hostile Chuck Todd - who started his career working for elected Democrats on the Hill, and whose wife is a media consultant for the Party. You may be surprised by how many members of the Washington press corps started their careers working for the Democrats, continue to work with, and/or married ranking members. It is no longer a secret that they actively colluded with the Clinton campaign either.
Yes, Trump exaggerates, but he isn't alone in doing so. The bulk of the press was in the bag for Hillary, despise Trump, and the reporting shows it. What they report as fact is just as often opinion and deceitful framing as Trump is braggadocious.
And let's not forget that rational, intelligent people can disagree on matters of import, the significance of facts, and so forth without ceasing to be rational.
run wild speculating about its savage implications. Thanks mainstream media for making sure to ram your bias down our throats whenever you can make the GOP look bad.
making such inflammatory claims. Even here in the article it's being misrepresented with falsely framing the context. Conway was talking about facts that weren't being reported (i.e., other things Spicer said), not promoting some form of doublethink. But of course, those two words were all anybody seemed to have taken away from the interview, and whazzerface at CNN was just too ready to take advantage of an excuse to call the administration "Orwellian" to bother with context.
But that's what you get when the bulk of the media is little more than a mouthpiece for the Democrat party.
If you look at the questions and breakdown, Republicans support expanding development of all sources of energy, Democrats only want to expand renewables. Except nuclear, about which both sides are tepid.
There's nothing preventing Apple from patching more than one version of iOS. The security fixes in iOS 4 could have been added to an iOS 3.1.4 for 1st gen iPhone users. But no, they released version 4 and gave the finger to anyone with the unmitigated gall to still own a two year old cellphone.
Every few months there's a story here about some dastardly thing that can be done with a "specially crafted SMS message", so security patches are always necessary, no matter how limited the feature set.
My first smartphone of any sort was a company issued iPhone 4. I remember that the first version of iOS I couldn't install was chock full of important security patches. I had a 1st Gen iPad, same situation. Apple only updates the latest version of iOS, and everyone else can go fuck themselves. [profanity added to imply honesty and sincerity]
It'll be something. That $12b in savings might also cost them the ability to manipulate transactions in order to generate billions in fees.
Not that they bear the burden of that $12b. We get to do that for them (where do you think those ATM fees came from?), plus a little extra, because banks treat us like shit and there's nothing we can do about it. They inflate their costs and pass them directly onto us - so saving money might actually lower profits. If something cost them $12b, they were probably charging us $13b for it.
And completely insecure since 2009. That's not thrift, that's risk. It might also be the worst thing Apple does - leaving users vulnerable to and ever expanding set of threats because they can't be bothered to patch their software. Why? Is it apathy? Is it greed - forcing people to spend $700 for support they're already entitled to rather than spending money to patch the holes? Whatever the reason, it's shitty behavior.
Slashdot Mirror
Like the sort of people who would fly into a rage and violently protest the speech of a gay Jew? Like in Berkeley last week?
And now y'all have an idea of how old I am.
protesters making a ruckus in airports and inconveniencing people who have nothing to do with it.
And with indefinite storage, you don't have to rescan your face when NBA 2K17 comes out.
To me, it doesn't sound like some sketchy privacy infringement, it sounds like a functional necessity for a pretty cool feature.
Get pissed off that I don't have authority over things that masquerade as medicine but somehow don't have to meet any of the standards for medicine or even do anything at all. Then I'd try to figure out how I could define them as food instead, and then regulate them out of existence.
To make up for what I assume they forgot to put on the inside of the back cover? Or do people just need to wrap some around the cable? What obvious and standard part of a monitor or cable did they forget?
I sure wouldn't subscribe if it was for personal use. Though the only time I ever did buy office for personal use I was a student, and got a hefty discount.
I'm saying the statement was presented to you with the context entirely replaced by people with an interest in harming the speaker. As for your list, you could have gotten that from James Carville. That was his playbook when he was working for Bill Clinton. He was so effective that it became the dominant strategy for dealing with opposition to Democrats.
I have heard many definitions of "fact" and/or "truth". That is not one of them.
Take a few deep breaths and calm down. Forget how much hate you have for Trump (hate blinds) and read a transcript of the interview. Pretend you're trying to wade through spaghetti code, it'll help keep activity in the rational regions of your brain and tone down emotional responses.
B. You're in no position to make that determination.
Yes, Trump exaggerates, but he isn't alone in doing so. The bulk of the press was in the bag for Hillary, despise Trump, and the reporting shows it. What they report as fact is just as often opinion and deceitful framing as Trump is braggadocious.
And let's not forget that rational, intelligent people can disagree on matters of import, the significance of facts, and so forth without ceasing to be rational.
run wild speculating about its savage implications. Thanks mainstream media for making sure to ram your bias down our throats whenever you can make the GOP look bad.
But that's what you get when the bulk of the media is little more than a mouthpiece for the Democrat party.
If you look at the questions and breakdown, Republicans support expanding development of all sources of energy, Democrats only want to expand renewables. Except nuclear, about which both sides are tepid.
Well, now that he has said he is coming when she gets released, I guess the topic is moot.
Cuz that lying bitch won't stop calling me.
Maybe the headline should read, "Researchers confirm tradition theory of megafauna extinction - "We ate them.""?
A big case right before the administration changes?
He should say that he'll come when she's been released. And do it.
Dozens is more than nozens!
There's nothing preventing Apple from patching more than one version of iOS. The security fixes in iOS 4 could have been added to an iOS 3.1.4 for 1st gen iPhone users. But no, they released version 4 and gave the finger to anyone with the unmitigated gall to still own a two year old cellphone.
My first smartphone of any sort was a company issued iPhone 4. I remember that the first version of iOS I couldn't install was chock full of important security patches. I had a 1st Gen iPad, same situation. Apple only updates the latest version of iOS, and everyone else can go fuck themselves. [profanity added to imply honesty and sincerity]
Not that they bear the burden of that $12b. We get to do that for them (where do you think those ATM fees came from?), plus a little extra, because banks treat us like shit and there's nothing we can do about it. They inflate their costs and pass them directly onto us - so saving money might actually lower profits. If something cost them $12b, they were probably charging us $13b for it.
And completely insecure since 2009. That's not thrift, that's risk. It might also be the worst thing Apple does - leaving users vulnerable to and ever expanding set of threats because they can't be bothered to patch their software. Why? Is it apathy? Is it greed - forcing people to spend $700 for support they're already entitled to rather than spending money to patch the holes? Whatever the reason, it's shitty behavior.