But this will just add to the times you have to retype. The password has to be correctly typed, and correctly timed. So it would be an inconvenience. Also when re-typing a password, the timing is often different because you want to get it right this time, and therefore focus more on each key.
All in all it is bound to have a higher re-type rate than normal passwords, but it might still have application in areas where emphasis is more on security and less on speed...
That is what/. is for. Only source for news needed, cause it's all the "Stuff that matters" (and News for nerds at the same time). You are sure that everything here is of interest, and nothing is redundant, out of date, boring or stupid!
It must have been a pretty directed explosion, if the submit button was hit, or perhaps it was a reflex, for submitting comments, developed during years of living the Slashdot Way trying to get first posts.
A chip that behaves erotically, that is why the price tag is so high, only big businesse can handle the excessive speed at which the pr0n is processed!
Well the next "killer app", needs a platform / framework to run on. So the next "killer app" should of course run on the next "big thing" they are not mutually exclusive!
The definition of realtime is to place a deadline on a proccess...and kill it if it has not completed by that time...
Weel not quite, there is a further distinction between hard realtme, and soft realtime. The description given here is soft realtime. In hard realtime systems, it has to be proven that no matter what, the process has completed it's task before the deadline.
This put aside, the parent poster is right, buzzwords are used very generously these days, and more often than not they are very effective at what they are supposed to... That is to make PHB's and Joe User go "WOW! This must be great."
It's OK, I do the same thing whenever I see something that looks spanish.
Weel, it is danish, and a rough translation would be "Will I see You? I certainly think I will!"
It's not a good translation, but catches the essence of it. The line is the closing line from a danish comedyshow. It is probably funnier if you know and like the show. I was hoping to get some reactions from other danes on this one, but I'm not a very active poster so your response is the first!
FYI danish and norwegian is quite similar, it is remnants from the time when Norway and Sweden was ruled by the Danish king.
We have been paying tax on CD-R and CD-RW for a couple of years now. The amount is 0,0533kr/minute, so the price af an 800MB CD went up with about 5kr ~ 0.66 this effectively doubled the price on CD's overnight!
Nowadays most of the CD's i buy comes from Germany! But even the Belgian tax is way less than ours!
No! Generalizations are often used in order to make a complex matter seem simple, thereby removing the need to see things from a different perspective. A generalization more often than not sounds plausible, and thereby makes most people not question it, not even think about it, just accepting it. Especially here in the/. hive. So I see a need to spell everything out once in a while.
Policies should be considered carefully
Yes because they are the result of applying generalizations. So consider your generalization carefully before you make a policy based upon it.
I'm certain, that at the "News for nerds" site of 50 years ago, a lot of people "posted" comments about this being completely unuseful research, demanding example applications!
Who wouldn't like to see the discussions on this, now?
The point is that _anything_ doctored cannot be considered news.
So it should not be allowed to zoom/cut/reorient (ok the last one is contrived) a photograph before it is printed. These operations take a part of photograph out of context, and is therefore doctoring to some degree.
I agree that adding/combining elements from different pictures is not a smart thing to do, at least not without a note in/by the picture, stating that it has been manipulated.
Remember that generalisations should always be considered carefully!
Please spare us, can people NOT post the requisite "their webserver must have been hosted on one of these" comments that this type of story always brings out like worms after a shower?
Slashdot Mirror
All in all it is bound to have a higher re-type rate than normal passwords, but it might still have application in areas where emphasis is more on security and less on speed...
That is what /. is for. Only source for news needed, cause it's all the "Stuff that matters" (and News for nerds at the same time).
You are sure that everything here is of interest, and nothing is redundant, out of date, boring or stupid!
EI: Explorer of Internet.
It must have been a pretty directed explosion, if the submit button was hit, or perhaps it was a reflex, for submitting comments, developed during years of living the Slashdot Way trying to get first posts.
Just check whether the Evil Bit is set or not!
Actually: GNU is Not Unix!
Why don't you do this in your journal? Make up your own moderation scheme, and let other people comment on the sig and/or the moderation?
Like the parent poster here. That was a new one. Very intelligent!
I hope I won't live to see the day when I'm no longer able to set the speed of my anti-clock. I hate when I can't control the time-travel device.
A chip that behaves erotically, that is why the price tag is so high, only big businesse can handle the excessive speed at which the pr0n is processed!
Bet he would like that!
Well the next "killer app", needs a platform / framework to run on. So the next "killer app" should of course run on the next "big thing" they are not mutually exclusive!
Weel not quite, there is a further distinction between hard realtme, and soft realtime. The description given here is soft realtime. In hard realtime systems, it has to be proven that no matter what, the process has completed it's task before the deadline.
This put aside, the parent poster is right, buzzwords are used very generously these days, and more often than not they are very effective at what they are supposed to... That is to make PHB's and Joe User go "WOW! This must be great."
Well gotta go now!
And if it doesn't matter, is it news for nerds then?
This is also the most common translation, but I was trying to catch the spirit of the remark, and actually found it quite difficult.
A better translation in the "meaning of each word"-sense is "See You later! I surely think so!"
Scandinavians, are so welcoming and friendly
Just for this remark I'll befriend you ;-)
Weel, it is danish, and a rough translation would be "Will I see You? I certainly think I will!"
It's not a good translation, but catches the essence of it. The line is the closing line from a danish comedyshow. It is probably funnier if you know and like the show. I was hoping to get some reactions from other danes on this one, but I'm not a very active poster so your response is the first!
FYI danish and norwegian is quite similar, it is remnants from the time when Norway and Sweden was ruled by the Danish king.
BTW Where did you learn Norwegian?
.K
HIGH.. into space? Then we know how they got there in the first place!
Nowadays most of the CD's i buy comes from Germany! But even the Belgian tax is way less than ours!
But this guy posted a HOWTO on getting it up and running, so he must've been running it, and thereby violating the EULA!
Policies should be considered carefully
Yes because they are the result of applying generalizations. So consider your generalization carefully before you make a policy based upon it.
Who wouldn't like to see the discussions on this, now?
So it should not be allowed to zoom/cut/reorient (ok the last one is contrived) a photograph before it is printed. These operations take a part of photograph out of context, and is therefore doctoring to some degree.
I agree that adding/combining elements from different pictures is not a smart thing to do, at least not without a note in/by the picture, stating that it has been manipulated.
Remember that generalisations should always be considered carefully!
THE CRAPTACULAR COUPLE
NO!
Wouldn't this be a RAIE?