Slashdot Mirror


Web Server Packed into RJ45 Connector

VinceTronics writes "Electronic Design magazine has a review (.pdf) of the XPort by Lantronix, a product that packs an entire web server into the volume of an RJ45 connector! This includes an 80186 controller, an OS, the TCP/IP stack, a 10/100 Ethernet transceiver, and the LAN interface magnetics. Downside is that the serial interface to the controller tops out at 300 kbps, but for $33 (in 10K quantities) it's a cool, easy way to net-enable just about anything."

438 comments

  1. mirror by RudeDude · · Score: 2, Informative

    Just in case: The PDF review doc

    --
    RudeDude
    Perl/Linux/PHP hacker
    1. Re:mirror by Oliver+Aaltonen · · Score: 0, Redundant

      And just in case... in case... http://download.aaltonen.us/17440.pdf

  2. No big deal... by tha_mink · · Score: 3, Funny

    I used to have an ear ring that could run seti@home.

    --
    You'll have that sometimes...
    1. Re:No big deal... by popeyethesailor · · Score: 2, Funny

      But does it have OGG support ?

    2. Re:No big deal... by RupW · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I used to have an ear ring that could run seti@home.

      Point is consumer electronics manufacturers can use it to internet enable their devices at very low R&D cost.

      Assuming, that is, they're willing to bump the retail price by $30 - $50.

      Which they won't be. Until there's *serious* demand for this stuff.

    3. Re:No big deal... by DJPenguin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Um, $20million would buy you about 600,000 of these dealies.

      I think they mean $33 each for quantities of 10k or more, not $33 for 10k!!

    4. Re:No big deal... by bofkentucky · · Score: 1

      My bad I wasn't paying attention, mod my ass into oblivion.

      --
      09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0
    5. Re:No big deal... by The_K4 · · Score: 1

      Hell i would pay $50-100 more for a fridge with a webserver that could graph/report on the temp, when the door was opened/closed. How much energy it's using. That would be SO worth the $$. Imagine a washing machine that could e-mail me when it's done! The possibilities are very cool. :)

    6. Re:No big deal... by ShortSpecialBus · · Score: 1

      gah, my friends have you beat....
      The Internet-enabled Kegerator! warning, it's hosted on a DSL line, and for sure they're hitting up kazaa pretty bad, so it'll be really really slow....

      --
      //FIXME: Bad .sig
    7. Re:No big deal... by The-Perl-CD-Bookshel · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wait, if these cost $30 - $50 wouldn't that bump the price of the endabled product up about $1,000?

      --
      I don't keep a lid on my coffee so when I walk around I look busy -me
    8. Re:No big deal... by Helter · · Score: 1

      Ummmmm, that's $33 EACH if you're buying in quantities of 10k.

    9. Re:No big deal... by The_K4 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hmmm......i believe you have slashdoted your friends.
      With friends like that who needs enemies?

    10. Re:No big deal... by Dman33 · · Score: 1

      Dude.. you suck. Friends don't let friends post their URL to slashdot. :)

      looks like your exfriends will never let you use that kegerator again...

    11. Re:No big deal... by Cyclometh · · Score: 3, Funny

      The additional price is only an issue if you consider this item being added to some product as new functionality. This is a godsend to any product in development that had some type of networking integration already slated for its feature set. In fact, for products being designed with this type of functionality in mind, this might actually reduce the final cost.

      Engineer Drone: "Yeah, hey boss- we could build it ourselves for a boatload of cash, or we could shell out $30/pop for 10K of these things and spend a few weeks integrating them into the widget. Whaddya think?"

      PHB: "Ka-ching!"

    12. Re:No big deal... by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I can see it now....

      Me: Hey Baby, come here often?

      Babe: No...hey is that a webserver in your pocket?

      Me: Why yes it is!

      Babe: I thought it would be bigger...

      Me: Dooooooh!

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    13. Re:No big deal... by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      Appliance manufacturers don't just build in $30 OEM components to add 'nice to have' features. There's probably already a Hitachi H8 controller in the appliance, and existing code that can just be turned on to implement the interface. Add a 17 cent connector and away they go.

    14. Re:No big deal... by ShortSpecialBus · · Score: 1

      bah, it was slashdotted before i post the link due to like 80 files on kaaza anyways...And it's on their second internet connection which they only use for kazaa anyways. They'd be happy that people were impressed with it. anyways, to summarize the page, the kegerator had a broken thermostat, so they built one, and have it controlled by a computer. the web page has graphs of temperature, etc...you can list over different lengths of time, etc. It's actually quite neat. It has some other stuff too, but I can't think of it right now. That's what you get when you have a house with chemical engineering students and electrical engineering students.

      --
      //FIXME: Bad .sig
    15. Re:No big deal... by Cyclometh · · Score: 1

      As I said, this won't be useful to any products already well into the design/production cycle, for reasons you and others cite. But if you're in the design stages for a new product that needs some type of remote management you could do via HTTP, appliance or no, this is something that's worth looking at (IMO). Depends on what features you need to support.

    16. Re:No big deal... by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > My bad I wasn't paying attention, mod my ass into oblivion.

      Careful what you ask for. I hear that's how the Goatse guy got started. *rimshot*

    17. Re:No big deal... by bofkentucky · · Score: 1

      I thought he was that guy the NYPD roughed up with a toilet plunger, amazing how UL works isn't it.

      --
      09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0
    18. Re:No big deal... by JDWTopGuy · · Score: 1

      But it'll probably melt if you slashdot it.

      --
      Ron Paul 2012
    19. Re:No big deal... by k_stamour · · Score: 1

      (drops to floor) NO BODY MOVE.... I JUST LOST THE WEBSERVER...em...just kinda slipped outa my hand....HAY look found my contact.....

      --
      Julius Caesar - Act I, Scene i: "What mean'st thou by that? Mend me, thou saucy fellow!"
    20. Re:No big deal... by majestyk2000 · · Score: 1

      Imagine a washing machine that could e-mail me when it's done!

      Rather than just buzzing like mine does?

  3. Good Thing by dreamchaser · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's a good thing that the review wasn't hosted on one of these things! They sound really cool, but there's no way they'd handle a slashdotting! Then again...maybe a Beowulf cluster of them would...

    1. Re:Good Thing by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

      No, because I don't whore Karma. I say what I want and if it costs me that is just fine and dandy with me!

    2. Re:Good Thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      actually, that's not a bad idea. Imagine how many of these little boogers you could stuff into a chassis. Or a fly for that matter...

    3. Re:Good Thing by cr@ckwhore · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's a good thing that the review wasn't hosted on one of these things! They sound really cool, but there's no way they'd handle a slashdotting!

      Ahh... but then again, *maybe* it is. Wouldn't that be the cat's ass?

      --
      Skiers and Riders -- http://www.snowjournal.com
    4. Re:Good Thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      RJ45 - you could certainly fit that in a cat's ass.

      I mean I think.

    5. Re:Good Thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I don't think the cat would be impressed. Particularly after it got slashdotted and the webserver in its ass had a meltdown! Meeeeoooorrrrrrrrrrrrooooooowwwww! Boom!

    6. Re:Good Thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, an RJ-45 connector is slighly larger than your cock. That difference for the cat's ass is: slightly streched (you), and must-be-related-to-goatse-to-get-this-thing-to-fit (RJ-45).

    7. Re:Good Thing by FunkyChild · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well maybe the CAT5's ass, anyway.

  4. Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now my fridge, toaster, washer & dryer can have their own IP addresses & websites.

    Bring on IPv6 to deal with it!

    1. Re:Great! by OneEyedApe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It sounds like that is what this is designed for.

      --
      Life sucks, but death doesn't put out at all....
      --Thomas J. Kopp
    2. Re:Great! by Fembot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah but Ironicly theres no mention of IPv6 in that pdf anywhere that I can see....

    3. Re:Great! by ip_vjl · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Why would you need IPv6?

      Are you planning on making your fridge world visible? If not, your appliances could all sit behind NAT and you'd still only need a single IP address for your entire house.

      I wouldn't want to get home and find out I've been H4X0R3D and have a freezer full of rotten food, so I don't think I'd ever give them world visible addresses.

      --

      Not that IPv6 is a bad thing, but this probably wouldn't significantly grow the total number of world routable addresses much, as they'd be on private nets.

    4. Re:Great! by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 1

      Actually, it would make sense for these to be defaulted (or restricted?) to non-routable internal IPs to prevent just that sort of thing. Make them usable on internal LANs only.

      N.

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
    5. Re:Great! by chef_raekwon · · Score: 1, Funny

      I wouldn't want to get home and find out I've been H4X0R3D and have a freezer full of rotten food, so I don't think I'd ever give them world visible addresses.

      what, you don't want the world to know what temp you are running your crisper at?

      (i know they aren't visible, but the sarcasm tags ARE there)

      --
      We're like rats, in some experiment! -- George Costanza
    6. Re:Great! by le_jfs · · Score: 5, Funny
      I want one!
      I can't wait to code a MUD (multi-user dungeon) for my fridge!

      ~$ telnet fridge.home
      user: le_jfs
      password: *********

      Welcome inside your fridge!
      It's dark. It's cold. You can hear a little hum coming from everywhere.

      command> open door
      The door is now open. Magically, the light turned on. You can see a path to the kitchen south.

      command> look
      The fridge contains a ten-days-opened bottle of milk, some ham and some cheese.

      command> look cheese
      It's greenish.

      command> put cheese in bin.
      The Cheese screams in terror. He resides now in the bin.

      command> look ham
      It's bluefish. It has some activity on it. A fly probabily layed eggs on it.
      You are hungry.

      command> wield knife
      You are now armed with a knife.
      You are hungry. You are cold.

      command> kill ham with knife
      You attack the ham with a knife.
      The ham strafes and ignores you.
      You attack the ham with a knife.
      The ham takes a cut and cries.
      You attack the ham with a knife.
      The ham flees south

      command> go south
      You are now in the kitchen.
      There is some ham in bad condition lying on the floor.

      command> kill ham with knife
      You attack the ham with a knife.
      The ham begs you to stop. It really hurts.
      You attack the ham with a knife.
      The ham dies with a tremendous 'Aaaaarg'.

      You won.
      You are hungry.

      command> go shopping.
      --
      main(char O){O++&&(((O-291)*O+27788)*O-868020?1:putchar(O++) )&&main(O);}
    7. Re:Great! by Mr.+Bad+Example · · Score: 5, Funny

      I wouldn't want to get home and find out I've been H4X0R3D and have a freezer full of rotten food

      All your bouillabaisse are belong to us.

    8. Re:Great! by kraksmoka · · Score: 1
      actually, if someone hacked your fridge, wouldn't they steal your bud light before they rotted out your food???

      as far as NATing goes, first, these things are just reporting devices, not controllers. a world viewable fridge, sure, why not, as long as there aren't any hooks to change settings.

      i just have a hard time thinking about my kitchen nat. what's next, a wireless bed station (oops, my secret is out:)

      --
      "You never want a serious crisis to go to waste." - Rahm Emanuel
    9. Re:Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some companies are using web interfaces in their routers, storage devices, virtual servers, printers, and even cable modems. Art & Logic has exampes of lots of embedded web interfaces

    10. Re:Great! by Sgs-Cruz · · Score: 3, Funny
      command> Open ice cream tub.

      You are eaten by a grue.

      --

      Karma: pi (Mostly due to circular reasoning in posts).

    11. Re:Great! by OneEyedApe · · Score: 1

      IPv6 could be a forthcoming feature. This sounds like the first version of the device. Maybe the second will support IPv6.

      --
      Life sucks, but death doesn't put out at all....
      --Thomas J. Kopp
    12. Re:Great! by Mitchell+Mebane · · Score: 2, Funny

      Title: Livin' in the Fridge
      Author: Weird Al Yankovic

      There's somethin' weird in the fridge today.
      I don't know what it is.
      Food I can't recognize.
      My roommate won't throw a thing away.
      I guess it's probably his.
      It looks like it's alive . . .

      And livin' in the fridge . . . livin' in the fridge,
      Livin' in the fridge . . . livin' in the fridge.

      There's something gross in the fridge today,
      It's green and growin' hair.
      It's been there since July.
      If you can name the object
      In that baggie over there,
      Then mister, you're a better man than I.

      It's livin' in the fridge.
      (You can't stop that mold from growin'.)
      Livin' in the fridge.
      (Can't tell what it is at all.)
      Livin' in the fridge.
      (You can't stop that mold from growin'.)
      Livin' in the fridge.

      Tell me, do you think it should be carbon-dated,
      Fumigated, or cremated and buried at sea?
      You try to save a little bit of your home cookin',
      Couple weeks later, got a scary-lookin' specimen.
      It always happens my friend,
      Again and again and again.

      Somethin' stinks in the fridge today,
      And it's been rottin' there all week.
      It couold be liver cake or wooly mammoth steak --
      Well, maybe I should take another peek . . .

      Livin' in the fridge.
      (You can't stop that mold from growin'.)
      Livin' in the fridge.
      (Can't tell what it is at all.)
      Livin' in the fridge.
      (You can't stop that mold from growin'.)
      Livin' in the fridge.

      Livin' in the fridge.
      (Don't know what it is, don't know what it is.)
      Livin' in the fridge.
      (Don't know what it is, don't know what it is.)
      Livin' in the fridge.
      (Don't know what it is at all.)
      Livin' in the fridge.

      --

      The roots of education are bitter, but the fruit is sweet.
      --Aristotle
    13. Re:Great! by serial+frame · · Score: 1

      One must not take for granted the vast powers of IPv6 auto-configurability. Even if the devices won't have any world-routable IPv6 addresses, one could have a device that hands out the addresses based on the devices' MAC addresses. Zero administration effort, consumer-friendly.

      --

      -
      And the Angel said unto me, "These are the cries of the carrots! The cries of the carrots!"
    14. Re:Great! by Majik+Sznak · · Score: 1

      I know it's already been modded up, but dude: that was gold.

      --
      Karma: Chameleon (Mostly affected by the 1980s)
    15. Re:Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alert! /. posting of the month!

    16. Re:Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "your appliances could all sit behind NAT and you'd still only need a single IP address for your entire house.

      I wouldn't want to get home and find out I've been H4X0R3D and have a freezer full of rotten food, so I don't think I'd ever give them world visible addresses."

      you can avoid that by, like, just not fucking bothering with any of this shit. Fridge web server my arse. A fridge is a beer server.

    17. Re:Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NAT sucks ass you bloodsoaked donkey tampon.

      fucking slashdot retard

    18. Re:Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is the single greatest slashdot comment ever. All the trolls, all the flames, all the crappy moderation - it was all worthwhile just to read that.

    19. Re:Great! by Mr.+Bad+Example · · Score: 1

      I know it's already been modded up, but dude: that was gold.

      Thanks, I'll be here all week. Be sure to tip your waitstaff. =)

  5. I'm wondering by dirkdidit · · Score: 0

    I'm really wondering who would buy these in a quantity of 10,000.

    Yes these are cool but what purpose would they exactly serve in such a large number?

    1. Re:I'm wondering by Hulver · · Score: 5, Funny
      If you were a fridge manufacturer and wanted to web-enable your fridges, you would buy as many of these as you built fridges.

      Imagine being able to check on the temparature of your fridge over the internet. Even install a web cam inside it. Check what groceries you need from work.

      Pow. Cheep, web enabled fridge.

      The only problem would be script kiddies. I 0wnzers your cuccumber man

    2. Re:I'm wondering by cdrudge · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Embedded systems. Put one in your toaster, fridge, hair dryer, internal diagnostics on your TV, spa, whatever. It's not meant to be a webserver for a high bandwidth website, but more for controlling some device via a web interface.

    3. Re:I'm wondering by klaasvakie · · Score: 1

      Yes these are cool but what purpose would they exactly serve in such a large number? beowulf cluster anyone?

      --
      # ssh -l neo the_matrix; killall -9 agent_smith
    4. Re:I'm wondering by e8johan · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Anything embeddable sells in tens of thousands. Stationary computers are the least produced computer type. Just imagine all microcontrollers in VCRs for example. I'd say that there are far more than 10000 VCRs sold each year. Now embedd a webserver into each VCR, so that you can program the timer over your private LAN. Thats a possible 10000 units. Now put the same protocol in your digital TV reciever/decoder to change channels, update codes, subscribe to PPV shows etc. and let the VCR change the channel of the decoder and you've got another 10k units.

      10k is a small number in the embedded world.

      Now, for the real price:
      "The list price of the XPort is $49.00. Discount pricing on the XPort is also available in volumes of ten thousand."
      according to http://www.lantronix.com/news/pr/2003/02-24-xport. html

    5. Re:I'm wondering by amorsen · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Ok, imagine your company makes sensors that output their results via RS-232 serial. Or controllers that are given commands via RS-232 serial. Or maybe you have machinery that is programmed through RS-232 serial. Either way, your would like to access those products remotely, and RS-232 just doesn't go very far. Add this thing, and suddenly your products are web-enabled.

      The price is a bit high still, but there is a lot of equipment where $33 extra a unit would not scare customers away.

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    6. Re:I'm wondering by mirko · · Score: 1

      Check what groceries you need from work.
      How about eatable RFID embedded in food, someone ?

      --
      Trolling using another account since 2005.
    7. Re:I'm wondering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      web cam inside it.> At last! We will finally know if that little light really does turn off when you close the door!

    8. Re:I'm wondering by walt-sjc · · Score: 5, Insightful

      At $33 each in quantity, I don't think we are going to see them in toasters anytime soon.

      As far as embedded systems goes, this is an order of magnitude or so too expensive. Manufacturers pinch pennies on even larger items like TV's, as each dollar increase in cost translates into something like $5 to the consumer, and potentially millions to the bottom line.

      Frankly, this technology isn't even appropriate anyway. For something more in line with the applications you are thinking about, look here where the technology is already imbedded in millions of consumer devices.

    9. Re:I'm wondering by AppyPappy · · Score: 1

      I'm really wondering who would buy these in a quantity of 10,000.


      Soft drink and snack machines, Scanners in factories, traffic counters, any equipment that that you want to query remotely to see if it is operating.

      --

      If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem

    10. Re:I'm wondering by TheEnglishPatient · · Score: 1

      On my fridge ( german can't remember the make off hand) the litle light DOESN'T turn off but goes dim instead
      Something to do with keeping the internal temperature up if the external temperature is too low.
      As me how I know Go on. Go on.
      No, on second thoughts don't, it isn't interesting
      N

    11. Re:I'm wondering by Pike65 · · Score: 1

      Yeah. It's a shame, because one having one of these things would be cool. I could finally retire my gi-fscking-normous old IBM full tower and replace it with an RJ45 ; )

      I don't suppose there's 2000 other people out there thinking the same thing, are there? . . .

      --
      "If being a geek means being passionate about something, then I pity those who aren't geeks." - Pike65
    12. Re:I'm wondering by Cyberdyne · · Score: 4, Interesting
      How about eatable RFID embedded in food, someone ?

      I don't know about edible, but I do like this idea; for most fruit, you could embed the tag in the skin, for example. I'd actually really like to be able to get a list of stuff in the fridge, be warned when something's approaching the eat-by date...

      Better still: some RFID tags have sensors in. A simple Perl script could track a shopping list for me, and either order replacements online or be synced to a PDA for shopping. Maybe even couple it with a Pricewatch-type site, so I know which supermarket would be cheapest for that particular list; work out what recipe I could make, or what I'd need to add.

      Alternatively - if this device can do 300 Kbit/sec in this version, how about cable-modem/ADSL routers? Up the bandwidth a bit, it would handle the load OK; as it is, it could make a nice easy dialup router. $33 with a serial port - add a simple modem, and you have the ultimate plug+play ISP: one end in the phone socket, the other in the NIC, and it's all preconfigured!

    13. Re:I'm wondering by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 1

      Well, no, a toaster isn't a good example.

      Stuff like air conditioning/heating control units, media stuff like VCRs, PVRs, etc, and of course, lightswitches and power outlets to make those damn X-10 modules (and their popups) obsolete.

      N.

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
    14. Re:I'm wondering by walt-sjc · · Score: 4, Informative

      Any sane manufacturer is not going to add a $33 part to a $70 VCR. This is completely the wrong application. Frankly, VCR's already have a decent enough CPU
      to web enable them for much less money than this part - like $3 for a single chip ethernet interface.

      Think of a webcam or something where you take that part, this, and bingo, webcam, front-door intercom, etc. Considering the price of similar items on the market, this still seems very expensive for lower-end applications.

    15. Re:I'm wondering by chef_raekwon · · Score: 2, Funny

      Add this thing, and suddenly your products are web-enabled.

      add another, hack with the tcpip stack, and your fridge is now a router!

      --
      We're like rats, in some experiment! -- George Costanza
    16. Re:I'm wondering by walt-sjc · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, keep in mind that VCR manufacturers are too freaking cheap to add a simple battery to even high-end SVHS models so you keep having to set the clock when power is lost for as little as 3 seconds. Instead, they think of ways to try and get time off the networks - trouble is that this doesn't work if you have a cable box. Sigh.

    17. Re:I'm wondering by e8johan · · Score: 1

      Of course a $33 component woun't find its way into low-end products. However, a new VCR with a harddrive and DVD+RW will cost you more. And it is more probable that the customers buing these units will be interested in an ethernet interface than a customer looking for a cheap unit.

      As for thinking about new products, it is easy to come up with numerous units that would benefit from networking. Especially standardized m2m communications would make things much easier for the users.

    18. Re:I'm wondering by infinite9 · · Score: 1

      Even install a web cam inside it.

      At last! We'll finally solve the mystery of whether the little light stays on!

      --
      Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
    19. Re:I'm wondering by palmpunk · · Score: 1

      Those X-10 modules you are thinking of (popups) are not the same ones that control light switches and power outlets.

    20. Re:I'm wondering by jetmarc · · Score: 1

      Unless the fridge manufacturer already installs the webcam and digtal
      temperatur sensor in the fridge, there is no point for him to install
      the web-enabler at all.

    21. Re:I'm wondering by jetmarc · · Score: 1

      From a LAN-enabled VCR I'd expect far more than just a dumb
      web interface to program it. I'd expect playback of digital
      movies (AVI) from LAN hosted storage, et al. A dumb web
      server is a toy that drives up cost, but (probably) not sales.
      The stuff that's really worth the effort, requires more power
      than an 80186 in an RJ45 jack.

    22. Re:I'm wondering by theflea · · Score: 1

      Not so fast....naysayers in 1985 could have said about the VCR: "At $900 each, I don't see these things in eveyrone's home". Now they're less than 1/10 that price, and every home has at least one. Besides that, $900 in 1985 dollars was a friggin huge purchase. I'm too lazy to find out what they would be in 2003 dollars.

    23. Re:I'm wondering by VivianC · · Score: 1

      How about eatable RFID embedded in food, someone ?

      Sweet! I could scan my family to see who ate the last orange!

      --
      Viv

      Gmail invites for ip
    24. Re:I'm wondering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and RS-232 just doesn't go very far

      Last time I checked ethernet can only run 100m. Most RS-232 drivers will run several KM, High end line-drivers can run hundreds of KM over over conditioned lines.

    25. Re:I'm wondering by tau-lepton · · Score: 1

      I've used Lonworks, my experience is that it is very expensive to program and install. I wrote our own tools to get around the cost and limitations of the LonWorks tools. I know about powerline carrier, ask the guys at CoActive what they think about using this in the home. And you still need a LonWorks gateway to communicate to the internet.

      I'm thinking that Bluetooth will be the new home automation standard. meets your $5 standard. Still need a gateway.

    26. Re:I'm wondering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "like $3 for a single chip ethernet interface."

      From what I have seen, ethernet interface hardware is cheap, it is the TCP/IP stack that cost money. I know there are open stacks out there like the one in eCos, but they are incomplete. I have used the larger device servers (CoBox Micro) from Lantronix for one-off jobs. In these types of applications it is cheaper to pay $49 for a quick and dirty solution.

    27. Re:I'm wondering by funbobby · · Score: 1

      For a lot of things this is an extremely low price. If you have a large piece of machinery that cost thousands of dollars, thirty three bucks is nothing. This company also sells (or at least used to sell) big boxes that do the same thing, and they sold a lot of them for a lot more than thirty bucks.

    28. Re:I'm wondering by agallagh42 · · Score: 1

      Eureka marketing moment! You can call it a refrigerouter! :-P

      --
      Carpe Cerevisi - Seize the Beer
    29. Re:I'm wondering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And then connect your toster, fridge, hair dryer, etc etc together using TP Ethernet?
      I don't think so...

      For this to be useful for purposes like you (and many others) mention, it first has to be wireless.

    30. Re:I'm wondering by Polo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, then the problem is that the manufacturers are AFRAID to add the interface because it'd be used for content transfer.

      If I had ethernet on every home entertainment component, it would be great. And I'd pay $100 more each.

    31. Re:I'm wondering by anonymous+loser · · Score: 1
      I don't know about edible, but I do like this idea; for most fruit, you could embed the tag in the skin, for example.

      Most fruit and veggies I buy already have those little stickers on them. It would just be a matter of making a sticky RFID tag that was cheap enough to stick on every piece of fruit, and of course having the infrastructure to track them both during the distribution process, and optionally at home using your RFID-enabled fridge, pantry, banana hook, etc.

    32. Re:I'm wondering by jxs2151 · · Score: 1
      there is a lot of equipment where $33 extra a unit would not scare customers away.

      Keep in mind that these little buggers are not going to stay at $33 ea for long. As with all new thingies, the manufacturing costs and thus the price will drop as production ramps up and economies of scale take over.

    33. Re:I'm wondering by thynk · · Score: 1

      Those X-10 modules you are thinking of (popups) are not the same ones that control light switches and power outlets

      Ummm... Yes they are. Same company, different product line. Now if they would just make a product that doesn't turn on the bedroom light 20 seconds after I turn it off....

      --

      Good judgment comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgment.
    34. Re:I'm wondering by ilumin8d · · Score: 1

      it's target audience?

      or did everyone completely miss the point of this device?

    35. Re:I'm wondering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ethernet can only run 100m

      Old copper tops out around that distance at full speed, but a) how much bandwidth would you need for a serial application anyway? and b) if you can afford to trench several Km, you can afford a couple $100 copper to fibre transcevers.

    36. Re:I'm wondering by Scareduck · · Score: 1

      ... which can only mean that your shit is traceable. Install an RFID scanner on every toilet, and I can paint a decent picture of where you have been.

      --

      Dog is my co-pilot.

  6. These seem cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sure, a lot of these devices seem cool (and I'll agree that they are), but to me and others in my line of work they're a security nightmare. Due to the small size, it's not hard build a device that could be hidden inside of a building on a network leaving it open to the person who left it there.

    I'd still love to have one to play around with, though!

    1. Re:These seem cool by mrtroy · · Score: 1

      Ya, seriously!
      I would love to have one and plug it in any empty connection at school/work/etc

      I could host everything from there!

      --
      [I can picture a world without war, without hate. I can picture us attacking that world, because they'd never expect it]
    2. Re:These seem cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now that's a great idea! Thanks!

    3. Re:These seem cool by rtaylor · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Can't see why that would bother you. You encrypt everything between the desktop and the server room anyway right? Just like your wireless access?

      I bet someone could generally walk in the frontdoor with a laptop and sit in the meeting room to accomplish the same thing without anbody saying anything.

      --
      Rod Taylor
    4. Re:These seem cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So there is the proof that it was a good idea to make the network dumb and put the "intelligence" into the leaves. It's time to rethink network security with that old paradigm in mind. Firewalls, network address based access controls and physical network access protection mean very little with devices like these around, and even less when the ethernet socket gets replaced with a WiFi transceiver. We need end-to-end authentication instead of "safe networks".

    5. Re:These seem cool by silas_moeckel · · Score: 1

      OK so they can throw a little box into your network. Now how do you mitigate well lets see first thigns first why should your firewall allow just anything to go out the door even simple encrypted passwords would lock down general inet access. Now yea some automated things need to run etc etc etc force them through logging proxies. DOnt you have a log of what ports are supposed to be active??? Get some control over your internal network svlans at least assuming your on a cisco network.

      --
      No sir I dont like it.
    6. Re:These seem cool by DickBreath · · Score: 4, Funny

      to me and others in my line of work they're a security nightmare. Due to the small size, it's not hard build a device that could be hidden inside of a building on a network leaving it open to the person who left it there.

      Because such a computing device can be misused, we need to write our legislators and get these outlawed.

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    7. Re:These seem cool by radish · · Score: 0, Troll

      You encrypt everything between the desktop and the server room anyway right?

      Errr... nope. Does anyone know of any large companies which do this? We authenticate and authorise of course, but not encrypt. The wireless stuff is different - WEP after all stands for "Wired Equivalent Privacy", in other words, the encryption on a wireless link is there to make up for the lack of physical security.

      I bet someone could generally walk in the frontdoor with a laptop and sit in the meeting room to accomplish the same thing without anbody saying anything /me looks at burly security guard, cameras, turnstiles, swipe-card doors and dogs.

      You know? I bet they couldn't :)

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    8. Re:These seem cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could easily hide one of these devices up your boyfriend's ass! This gives the expression "plugging in" a while new dimension.

    9. Re:These seem cool by brakk · · Score: 1

      You have security dogs at your company?

    10. Re:These seem cool by radish · · Score: 1

      Yup, security & sniffer (explosives I assume).

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    11. Re:These seem cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hackers are not yet plugging these "bugs" into corporate networks. They are too expensive and there are other ways. But considering them a future threat, what would you do to counter it? Step up physical security? Put blind plugs in every unused switch port and mark every connector with sealing wax? Ports automatically shut down when a cable is unplugged (or a machine goes offline)? At what point is a secure network becoming more expensive than maintaining secure nodes on an untrusted network?

    12. Re:These seem cool by radish · · Score: 2, Interesting

      All good points, there are issues here - I was just pointing out that the assumption that large companies encrypt all their IP traffic is, AFAIK, incorrect.

      Personally, I think physical security has to be number one. Secondly, think about how these things work.

      I assume that the bug will sniff interesting data and pipe it out of the LAN into the hands of the cracker. So we need to tighten outbound security. Web traffic is routinely proxied, so the bug would have to know where the proxy is. Now how about we put auth on the proxy? The bug now needs a valid token to get an outbound connection. Still not impossible to break, but very much harder - the intruder will need more than 30 seconds to plug the thing in, he'll need inside information as well. How about we also put in MAC filtering? The bug would have to sniff a valid MAC and use that, hoping no-one would notice. It should be easy enough to run an IDS which looks for duplicate MACs and blacklists them.

      The other use for the bug (taking requests from the outside and executing them on the inside) would already be blocked by firewalls etc on incoming connections. Nothing can connect from the outside to the general LAN. The server rooms (where machines which are accessible are located) of course need to have very tight physical security.

      Just some ideas - it's by no means an easy problem to fix, and this is a very real risk.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    13. Re:These seem cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You know? I bet they couldn't :)


      Never underestimate social engineering. I've worked at a number of large firms and have always been surprised at how easy it is to get into "secure" areas. If you just drop the right names and speak the right lingo it's easy. Certainly a lot easier than going through all the correct channels to get the access I needed to do my job.

    14. Re:These seem cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You have security dogs at your company?

      yes, and they shoot bees from their mouths.

    15. Re:These seem cool by swb · · Score: 1

      Sniffing data assumes they are able to sniff data in the first place. Using good switches that don't turn into dumb hubs when their packet buffers or MAC tables flood is a good idea.

      A properly and sanely layer-3 segmented network helps here, too -- keep your servers on a more secure core network and require traffic going from one subnet to another to traverse the core is another good idea, as you can limit what can happen between subnets.

      Don't allow incoming connections to client subnets ever, and seriously limit non-proxied outbound connections.

      I haven't done this, but I'd also be amused with the idea of DHCP leases that require an IP change periodically (ala the cable modem people), or at least check your DHCP leases to find "old" leases that have't turned over.

      It may be possible to reduce a "sleeper" bug like this to unusability from the outside. Although if they embed a cellular modem in it, all bets are off.

    16. Re:These seem cool by rmarll · · Score: 1

      Because such a computing device can be misused, we need to write our legislators and get these outlawed.

      A good idea. But I'm going to start with sticks. They're everywhere, and any terrorist could pick one up and kill someone with it.

    17. Re:These seem cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This doesn't apply to the currently discussed gadget, but how hard could it be to create a similar device with two ethernet ports (one socket and one plug) and configure it as a bridge? Then it can piggyback an existing connection, both physically and logically, thereby circumventing all (switch-)port level network security. As soon as the bug has found a way to load external webpages or even resolve external domain names, it can leak data out and receive remote control information.

    18. Re:These seem cool by swb · · Score: 1

      You get access to the data that the 'normal' machine has access too and can presumably 'borrow' its IP address and other logical connection attributes, but I don't see how it lets you bypass any security that would otherwise apply to any other device.

      The device you describe would be great for spying on a specific PC, especially if it could fit into a wall socket. Add a cell modem and you have some seriously compromised security on that PC.

    19. Re:These seem cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It could sniff credentials and act on behalf of the normally attached PC, which means it can read anything which that PC could but wouldn't read under normal circumstances. That's a far more serious attack than passive listening on one switchport. Depending on the level of risk an attacker would want to accept, he could limit the data harvesting to sources which have been contacted by the PC, before he let's the bug explore them, or he could make the bug connect to other resources, too. Most networks, especially those where the admins think they've done their job when the local network perimeter is impenetrable, have very little inner security. Take the recent MSSQL-worm for example: Some machines on the intranet weren't patched, probably because they were not seen as security-critical. There are good reasons to handle security this way, but wireless forces us to think of a different strategy. Now, instead of scrapping wireless because securing it is too complicated/expensive, we should look at these small devices and realize that regular ethernet faces or will face the same risks. Securing network perimeters is a valuable part of a security strategy, but under these circumstances, it can only be supplemental.

    20. Re:These seem cool by dotgain · · Score: 1
      in half a meg?

      what's your definition of everything?

  7. Not that big of a downside... by heldlikesound · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Downside is that the serial interface to the controller tops out at 300 kbps

    This seems doesn't seem like that big of a deal, for the kind of appications this is targeted for (security system modules, refrigerators, answering machines, etc...) I'd think 300 kbps is more than adaquate, you can even do some streaming video, with a reasonable bit-rate.

    --


    Cloud City Digital: DVD Production at its cheapest/finest
    1. Re:Not that big of a downside... by Fembot · · Score: 1

      ...and It would prevent comprimised devices from wreaking too much havok. (Lets face it it will happen sometime)

      I cant think of any reason why you'd ever want to have a domestic fridge/awnswering machine etc serving more than one request at anyone time.

    2. Re:Not that big of a downside... by Radical+Rad · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually it tops out at 230kbps. The range is listed as 300-230k bps in the product brief.

    3. Re:Not that big of a downside... by ferkelparade · · Score: 1

      The big question being, why would you want streaming video from your fridge?

      --
      frotz grue
    4. Re:Not that big of a downside... by bruthasj · · Score: 1

      That's going into the device. Coming out of the device you can poll lots of statuses or convert a legacy serial device and hook it to the network. At our company, we use the Lantronix Device servers that come with 8 ports and 1 ethernet connection. Buying these one port at a time would be lots cheaper. Too bad you have to by lots of 10k.

    5. Re:Not that big of a downside... by DickBreath · · Score: 1
      why would you want streaming video from your fridge?

      • I want to see what there is to eat
      • I want time lapse to watch new life forms grow
      • I want to check the temperature from work (God only knows why?)
      For any of these extremely useful revolutionary concepts to work though, I would need a web based interface to remotely turn on the refrigerator light. Now we can't have just anyone turning on our light, using up electricity. So I propose that the computer in the fridge be powerful enough to support some kind of secure authentication before allowing the light to be turned on. Now it becomes apparent that we need...... [..snip.. I'll stop here.]

      I hope this answered your question.

      Finally, one more thought. All of these overengineering applications will be a tremendous boost to the economy. It will raise the prices of refrigerators by only 60%.
      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    6. Re:Not that big of a downside... by realdpk · · Score: 1

      They retail for the low, low price of 49.95! Act now!

    7. Re:Not that big of a downside... by Quizme2000 · · Score: 1

      to see if the light stays on of course!

      --
      "Get them before they get....
    8. Re:Not that big of a downside... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now you've lost me. 300-230k? Is that a badwards range or 30kbps. Guess I should RTFpdf, but I hate how slow Acrobat is.

    9. Re:Not that big of a downside... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I once heard they wanted have your fridge call for service before it fails. Sounds expensive to me.

    10. Re:Not that big of a downside... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Start at 300 bps, goes to 230 kbps. I suppose that might be useful in some embedded apps, where 33 characters per second is a sufficient data rate, and old equipment talks at that rate anyway.

    11. Re:Not that big of a downside... by messiertom · · Score: 1

      Plus you get to see if little gnomes appear when you close the door and have little parties with their gnome friends.

    12. Re:Not that big of a downside... by mlush · · Score: 1
      I once heard they wanted have your fridge call for service before it fails. Sounds expensive to me.

      Perhaps overkill for a fridge, but in my neck of the woods freezers hold £4000+ worth of reagents and lots irreplacible samples. The typical domestic chest freezer dosn't exactly hold smallchange either

  8. Imagine a beowolf cluster of these... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...it'd be really small.

    1. Re:Imagine a beowolf cluster of these... by Bad_Feeling · · Score: 1

      Who in the world still finds that funny? Parent should be modded (-1, Cliche), beowulf on /. is almost as bad as ackbar on fark.

      --
      Disclaimer: On the other hand, I am kind of a psycho...
  9. Let me get this straight by TopShelf · · Score: 1

    What sort of applications would this be used for? PC-based terminals like cash registers and the like, which could then be maintained from a central point using a web interface? I'm just trying to wrap my head around why this would be useful...

    --
    Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    1. Re:Let me get this straight by odyrithm · · Score: 1

      well you could put one in your coffe machine, and code up a web page to turn it on and off.. for starters..

      --
      moo
    2. Re:Let me get this straight by Max+Romantschuk · · Score: 1

      What sort of applications would this be used for?

      Armed with this and a crossover cable you could do instant network card, network settings and browser settings tests.

      A hell of a lot easier than debugging your network to see if a workstation is working properly. In some scenarios anyway :)

      --
      .: Max Romantschuk :: http://max.romantschuk.fi/
    3. Re:Let me get this straight by Saint+Aardvark · · Score: 4, Funny
      Where have you got a crapload of RJ45 cables? That's right, an office. What's the biggest driving force behind Internet technologies? That's right, pr0n. So just imagine the HUGE surge in live secretary upskirt cam websites this product will enable.

      Hell, there'll be so many, it'll simultaneously turn around the tech slump AND drive us all to IPv6.

      Until, of course, someone mistakenly installs 10,000 of these babies in the server room. All those geeks...<shudder>

    4. Re:Let me get this straight by bonizzem · · Score: 0

      At least could be a good hack for the digital guitar

    5. Re:Let me get this straight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's see here. Buy a bunch of small aggregation switches and plug 50 or so of them in each switch. Each one with its own private IP address. Plug the aggregation switches into a set of load balancers that can NAT everything to public IP address space. Boom! You have a server farm that can really kick butt. By my calculations you could do a 3 gigabit serverfarm for a total cost of under $400k.

    6. Re:Let me get this straight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Art & Logic has some excellent examples of what you might use an embedded web server for. Check out:

      embedded application screen shots
    7. Re:Let me get this straight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      whoa. web enabled vibrating dildo. i see where you're going now with this...

    8. Re:Let me get this straight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All those geeks...<shudder ...wear pants, where I come from.

  10. Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is it going to serve? Does it come with a mini-hard drive?

  11. Forget about stealth Dreamcasts! by Gudlyf · · Score: 4, Insightful
    In a previous article, there was talk about the possibility of hackers placing small Dreamcasts on corporate networks for packet sniffing and whatnot. If they can make a webserver as small as an RJ45 connector, what's stopping someone from making one that can spy on the network?

    If somehow someone puts one of those in your network closet (or heck, anywhere on the network), good luck finding it -- it's a connector for godsakes!

    --
    Trolls lurk everywhere. Mod them down.
    1. Re:Forget about stealth Dreamcasts! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Time for the insane firewalling rules.

    2. Re:Forget about stealth Dreamcasts! by Daytona955i · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It still needs to connect to your network which means a new light on your hub/switch/router. A regular portscan of your network ip address range would find this, then you can just pull the connection at the other end. I don't think the security concerns are as great as everyone seems to think. I think it would be cool to modify it to integrate a wireless card with it to allow a wider market. I for one don't really feel like running cables into my kitchen.
      -Chris

    3. Re:Forget about stealth Dreamcasts! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is no big deal if you have four devices on your network, but what if you have 400?

    4. Re:Forget about stealth Dreamcasts! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hmm, it can be done on a network of ~20,000 machines, so I don't think 400 would be too big of a problem.

    5. Re:Forget about stealth Dreamcasts! by cgenman · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I don't know if noticing a new light will provide any protection... computers here are routinely plugged in and out depending upon agent and client needs, etc, and that portscan erancy might just be a new laptop that somebody plugged in. I would think what you need to do is moniter the traffic out of your network, and prevent anyone from forwarding sniffed packets across your firewall. They might be difficult to detect if the machine had built in ssh, a time-delay, and mimmocked normal traffic use (requesting /. at 10:00 AM, for example).

      The best protection against this is that with the above mentioned precaution it is unnecessary. If someone can smuggle themselves into your building, install a piece of hardware onto your network, and smuggle themselves out, then back in and out again to remove the device, why not just install a keylogger onto the back of someone's keyboard and get admin priviledges?

      Personally, I'm hoping this gets integrated into webcams. I would love to setup a camera out of the side window of my basement to know when the carpool has come, but really don't feel like putting a full server into that environment.

    6. Re:Forget about stealth Dreamcasts! by Ctrl-Z · · Score: 1


      It still needs to connect to your network which means a new light on your hub/switch/router.

      I don't know if that would help for organizations that have a wall full of switches/routers. One more light wouldn't really make much of a difference.

      --
      www.timcoleman.com is a total waste of your time. Never go there.
    7. Re:Forget about stealth Dreamcasts! by gwappo · · Score: 1
      A regular portscan of your network ip address range would find this

      Forgive me for saying so, but I think that's a tad naive, the point here is that this little thing can gain net-access. What actual packets I send across the network is up for the software to determine.

      One step further - if I make something of similair dimensions as a pass-through, I can spoof any traffic that comes along and nothing would be detected from an ip-scan.

    8. Re:Forget about stealth Dreamcasts! by tigersha · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you can run this gizmo in promiscuous mode without an IP stack it would not HAVE an IP address but would still be able to snag all the ethernet frames and perhaps filter them. OK, the bandwidth out of the serial lines would probably preclude this, but it would be semi-trivial to build a box about the size of, say a box of matches with one of these and an IBM CF microdrive to capture all the goodies. Such a thing would be bigger, but still would be easy to hide. For instance, plug it into a telephone case and connect the normal phone cable inside the phone to this thing and surreptiously plug the phone cord into the ethernet jack. Noone would notice (except perhaps that the phone is dead). You could even rig it so that you switch CF cards once per day through a small slot on the phone and analyze the stuff at your leisure.

      All of this simply pushes further into the idea that perimiter security on networks just do not cut it anymore. Perimiter security is where you have a firewall that blocks from the outside and everything on the inside is free to do whatever it wants. Soon you will have to use edge security, where each edge in the internal network is explicity opened and configure and run IpSec inside the internal network too. See the new ACM Queue Mag (which has the inaugural issue online) for an article amout this. www.acmqueue.com

      --
      The dangers of excessive individualism are nothing compared to the oppressiveness of excessive collectivism
    9. Re:Forget about stealth Dreamcasts! by D_Gr8_BoB · · Score: 1
      You'll need a machine slightly bigger than an RJ45 plug, but it's no difficult task. One of those Briq or similar machines would be ideal. You'll specifically need two ethernet cards, one of which you can set the MAC address for.

      • Find a desktop machine used by someone clueless somewhere you can be alone for a while. This one's especially easy with an insider connection.
      • Set one of your machine's ethernet cards' MAC address to the desktop's MAC address.
      • Find somewhere to hide the box between the desktop and whatever it plugs into. In the wall or ceiling is best. You'll need something to invert the pin order on the inside cable.
      • Bring up the desktop's IP address on the external network. Bring up an address on the same subnet on the internal network, with the netmask set so only that address uses that network. Turn on NAT to the internal network. Enable port forwarding for any services the desktop is running (Windows filesharing, etc).
      • Start SSH on the least suspicious port you can find that's not firewalled.
      Now the network administrator sees the same number of machines, the same MAC address, and (almost) the same ports open on the machine. If the desktop gets turned off frequently, you can even schedule your machine to not run SSH until late at night, when it also stops responding to pings, getting it passed over by most portscanners.
    10. Re:Forget about stealth Dreamcasts! by brakk · · Score: 1

      1, Most large companies are using switched networks which prevents sniffing.

      2, If you could sniff the network, all you would need to capture was login names and password hashes. Then just do a little LC4 at home and come back later with a laptop in a meeting room or try to VPN in from the public library with the logins you have.

    11. Re:Forget about stealth Dreamcasts! by phylus · · Score: 1

      It was my understanding that you can enable a packet sniffer and not give it an IP address. If it has no IP address, it certainly won't be responding to port scans. You still do get a light though, you're right. All you have to do is 'ifconfig eth0 up', viola, no IP. I have a box at home running Snort like this.

      But, if you have a switched network, the thing won't see anything useful anyway. Somebody would have to break into a closet somewhere, put it on a port, break into the switch, and mirror traffic to the thing (which will most likely break it's bandwidth barriers).

    12. Re:Forget about stealth Dreamcasts! by DickBreath · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It still needs to connect to your network which means a new light on your hub/switch/router.

      You're right. This is a major drawback.

      What we need is help from some hardware hackers. Surely someone skilled with electronics could build a, say, calculator sized board, duct taped to a square 6-volt lantern battery, that would have both the function of a hub and a packet sniffer using a small embedded microcontroller.

      The way I propose building it, such a device would plug between an ethernet jack and a computer. It would install inline. (Although my proposed construction method is too bulky to be hidden inline, but the construction price is right. So it needs to go "inline" up in the suspended ceiling.

      Since it is inline, it doesn't "take up" an ethernet port. It piggybacks on a legitimate device that is entitled to have a network connection.

      A regular portscan of your network ip address range would find this, then you can just pull the connection at the other end.

      Not true. Just because the thing listens on ethernet does not mean it needs to respond to portscans. Heck, it doesn't even have to have an IP address. It doesn't even need to have a MAC address!

      Late at night, when the device the sniffer is piggybacked onto isn't doing anything, our sniffer could then use the same MAC address and IP address as the piggybacked device. Packets sent out from our sniffer could look to the LAN, switches, routers, etc. just like they had come from the piggybacked device. In fact, no reason we couldn't do this during the daytime. Our sniffer would watch for reply packets comming to our MAC and IP address to one of OUR port numbers, and just not relay those packets thru to the piggybacked device whose connection we're leaching from.

      Okay, maybe this shouldn't have a "hub", but should really be an embedded computer with TWO ethernet ports. It's normal function is to "transparently" bridge all packets between the two so that it is invisible "inline".


      I sure wish such an inline sniffer could be truly small so that it literally could go "inline" between two ethernet cables, connecting them together. But the price of such equipment isn't there yet for most of us.

      Another problem that I touched on above is how to power such a device. I mentioned the possibility of battery power. This is fine if you don't want a permanent "bug" in someone's network.

      Better is to somehow power it from utility power. A small AC adapter? A very tiny switching power supply on the sniffer's circuit board so that you just use aligator clips to hook into 110v power, such as in some light fixture in the suspended ceiling? (You still need battery backup for "lights off" hours.) Well, maybe just the insides of an AC adapter bolted to your board, with alligator clips for 110v power. Again, the price and ease of construction is right for those of us without NSA style budgets.

      I wish I could buy some of the NSA's packet sniffers from ThinkGeek.


      Another problem is how does the device communicate to its master? IRC is one possibility. Instant messaging? P2P? What about a P2P that is bandwidth friendly like OpenNap? The device connects to a server, offers several bizzarre files to upload. When one of those files is uploaded, that triggers it to search for and then "download" a file of new commands or firmware. When a different file is requested for upload, the sniffer yields up its booty. Besides IRC or OpenNap, the device could pretend to visit certian web sites. Various URL's of the web site would secretly communicate "bits" of steganographic information. For instance, it visits my "slash" site. It checks the last 64 comments. Which of the 64 comments it checks, communicates a 6-bit value to the web server. Of course, once such a device is discovered, the web server might be implicated. Another possibility is to e-mail various yahoo or hotmail accounts with encrypted infor

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    13. Re:Forget about stealth Dreamcasts! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Personally, I'm hoping this gets integrated into webcams. I would love to setup a camera out of the side window of my basement to know when the carpool has come, but really don't feel like putting a full server into that environment.

      sounds like you want an Axis webcam. www.axis.com they have cameras w/ webserver integrated. runs linux/boa on CF. plug into ethernet, do some configuration, you're set.

    14. Re:Forget about stealth Dreamcasts! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Most large companies are using switched networks which prevents sniffing.

      arpspoof. mitigate by noting aberrant arp traffic.

    15. Re:Forget about stealth Dreamcasts! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or IQinVision, an Axis competitor. More of an industrial camera than the axis, but also quite good.

    16. Re:Forget about stealth Dreamcasts! by ddriver · · Score: 1

      Arp traffic doesn't contain uid/pwds or pwds for your db. Which is all I really give a shit about.

      It takes a special kind of remedial to packet sniff at a switched port, hoping to find my password hash.

      --
      I found my inner child, then I got caught abusing it...
    17. Re:Forget about stealth Dreamcasts! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      You'd have to tie it to a bluetooth module of small size. (The one linked is 14.5 x 11.9 x 2.3mm.) You also need a power supply, though it might be possible to power it from ethernet, but that would probably double the size of the device.

      What I'd do with that, in order for it to remain undetected, would be to attach it to a Cybiko. The cybiko has a documented expansion port and a known instruction set, so this should be relatively trivial compared to other hacking tasks. With a better antenna it would have quite a bit of range and while someone could sniff it with a cybiko, they're more likely to check for 802.11.

      Making something this small would really only be useful for espionage if you used it to compromise a device by installing it in place of an ethernet port. The problem with that is that the other interface on it is so damned slow. You need one of these with dual ethernet before there's any point in doing that.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    18. Re:Forget about stealth Dreamcasts! by rthille · · Score: 1

      We've got Cisco IP phones here, so you could just power your device from the Ethernet cable!

      --
      Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
    19. Re:Forget about stealth Dreamcasts! by CaptCanuk · · Score: 1

      Easy to detect all of these items if they are always on... just kill the power for the rest of the floor minus the hub and you'll notice that your device is still active or connected to the hub.

      --
      ---- The geek shall inherit the Earth.
    20. Re:Forget about stealth Dreamcasts! by HiThere · · Score: 1

      I wonder how a combination of this, a router, and a wireless node could be.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    21. Re:Forget about stealth Dreamcasts! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it were plugged into the back of the PC, you could power it from the USB port. You can power an electric toothbrush off USB...

      http://www.watch.impress.co.jp/akiba/hotline/200 30 222/etc_habrashi.html

    22. Re:Forget about stealth Dreamcasts! by riffzifnab · · Score: 1

      So all you people worried about corporate security riddle me this: how many corporate networks use hubs? Packet sniffing off a switch will only get you the broadcasts and the multicasts. Yea you still can get some information from this but if your are only going to be passively sniffing a network thats the only traffic you will get. And if some one starts actively probing your network you IDS will hopefully catch it and you can take it out.

      but it is still durn nifty.

    23. Re:Forget about stealth Dreamcasts! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Another problem is how does the device communicate to its master? IRC is one possibility. Instant messaging? P2P?
      Finally, a use for Freenet!
    24. Re:Forget about stealth Dreamcasts! by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      Easy to detect all of these items if they are always on... just kill the power for the rest of the floor minus the hub and you'll notice that your device is still active or connected to the hub.

      Pfff! Yeah, that sure is easy. I'll just do a broadcast page on the phone system and say "everyone shut off every computer, networked printer, modem-pooler, server, and outside router for the next 30 minutes because I think there might be a secret spy device in the ceiling". I'd be fired so fast. And even if I wasn't, It'd take forever to find all the stuff that people forgot or weren't around to shut down. And if your network is small enough for this to be easy, it's small enough that you should just map the patch panel out and find the extraneous link that way.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    25. Re:Forget about stealth Dreamcasts! by loraksus · · Score: 1

      Oh come on, seriously, if you had a rack full of ports, its not like an additional port would make a visible difference, say, in the area of 500 ports - even if you were looking, I'd highly doubt that you would notice that extra light. I'm not even going to go into the average "admin" who became the computer tech because he / she sat beside the printer.

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
    26. Re:Forget about stealth Dreamcasts! by SubtleNuance · · Score: 1

      if youve got a switch as opposed to a hub in the server room youve managed to sniff the network traffic between 1pc and wherever... why not just install some spyware?

    27. Re:Forget about stealth Dreamcasts! by DickBreath · · Score: 1

      Maybe when the leeched device is turned off, our bug un-power's its ethernet jack on the "uplink" side. For a set number of hours. Now, if someone evil performs the attack you suggest, they can't find our toy. But if the leeched PC is powered off for the night, then we will turn ourselves back on, potentially, during the wee morning hours, and back off until morning. When the leeched PC is powered up, we re-power our uplink side.

      This is a possible detection strategy I had not considered. Anyone planning such a network bug would need to plan their design accordingly.

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    28. Re:Forget about stealth Dreamcasts! by DickBreath · · Score: 1

      If you have sufficient access to know that such a bug would not be successful, then you probably wouldn't have installed it in the first place.

      In this case, software is a cheaper, and probably safer alternative.

      The advantage of the piggybacked hardware "agent" implanted into the network is that it survives whatever device is attached to the ethernet jack in the compromised office, and survives any complete software re-installation on said device.

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    29. Re:Forget about stealth Dreamcasts! by DickBreath · · Score: 1

      You might be amazed how much you can learn and then remote compromise from passive sniffing even in the presence of a switch and an evil IDS.

      First, passwords. Second, lots of other great dirt. In fact, such a device might have been installed simply to monitor one terrorist rather than the entire network.

      Such a bug's installation requires physical access. Implication: some knowledge of the individual or network being monitored. If they have a switch, such a device might need to be installed at a different location within the network. Or not at all, in leiu of a different approach.

      Maybe if the designer of such a bug thinks ahead far enough, or if enough "wargames" are conducted, then this possible outcome is considered ahead of time. If the bug sets off the evil IDS, the first thing that will be suspected is that the leeched PC has been compromised. Maybe the device can detect a complete reinstallation of the host PC. Maybe it's OS signature changed, or some other indicator that tips you off to the suspicion so that you can stop the activities that are known to set off the evil IDS.

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    30. Re:Forget about stealth Dreamcasts! by DickBreath · · Score: 1

      Hey, what an Idea!

      The device "uploads" its booty by inserting it into the freenet using psuedo-random keys that the bug's owner knows the sequence of?

      But what if the bug doesn't want to become a fully functioning node itself?

      The bug also needs to be very low-traffic so as not to be noticed.

      In fact, the advantage of just vising "magic" blogs via. port 80, looking like web traffic, is that the bug's traffic might just "disappear" into the background noise. Reminds me of steganography.

      In fact, if you are the NSA, then you can probably also bug the LAN's outside connection. Your inside planted bug merely visits "normal", "respectable" news and corporate web sites. The pattern of visits, search terms used, etc. are how the bug communicates its booty to the outside world in secret. Some secret in the HTTP GET request could inform the outside that this is really the bug talking, and not just another web browser who is checking some stock price, or CNN, etc.

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
  12. Cool, this would solve the web server on the plane by wadiwood · · Score: 1

    lack of.

    Ie I think an aeroplane would be better off using a rj45 in the chair arm, and now they can squish the server in there too. Now we just have to solve how to connect it to the rest of the internet without interferring with the navigation systems and anti missile targetting.

    It sure beats installing the webserver in a blowfly.

    --

    -- it must be true, it's on the internet.
  13. My Fridge by hhawk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sounds interesting. You take a modern Refrig. and you have all of the internal processor(s) and sensor(s) output their data to this thing and then while I'm sitting at work I can check and see how well my Fridge is running..

    It might be more fun in the TV so it can keep a log of with the kids and the Spouse are watching not to mention the washing machine! [Dirty water detected, extend wash cycle (yes) (no)].

    --
    http://www.hawknest.com/
    1. Re:My Fridge by troc · · Score: 1

      No no no no no........ Your TV can monitor the data from the fridge and other kitchen appliances and co-ordinate the cooking/preparation of your food with ad-breaks so all you have to do is walk there and get things.

      Furthermore, teh bath will know when to empty so you don't miss your favourite programmes, the computer will know to stop downloading pr0n when the SO opens the door (the web enabled doormat senses their weight...). The car warms up the engine as the diswasher senses you putting the empty coffee cup in it in the morning.

      I'm actually quite scared all of a sudden. I think I might pull the switch.

      Aaargh, the switch has just told the front door to refuse entry to my house, my car won't start and the toaster has said it refuses to toast crumpets anymore...........

      Troc

      --
      Troc's dubious podcast and blog: http://www.trocnet.net
  14. They'd make great controllers.. by caveat · · Score: 4, Informative

    ..for cheap home electronic devices you might want to web-enable (i.e. tell the 100-DVD jukebox to have the following playlist ready when you get home, have the fridge print you out dinner recipies, blah blah blah), but with 512kb of flash for the web pages and a (relatively) slow interface, they certainly wouldn't be useful for serving (and they aren't really being sold as such, despite what the tagline says - the PDF mentions serving, but the main push seems to be monitoring & control..good idea for something like this).

    --

    Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. - Aldous Huxley
    1. Re:They'd make great controllers.. by PeDRoRist · · Score: 1

      hmmmm
      512kb should be enough for everybody...
      ...well at least it should be enough for 100 the5k.org entries.
      Nice!

      --

      Anything you do can get you slashdotted, including nothing.
    2. Re:They'd make great controllers.. by IWannaBeAnAC · · Score: 1

      The relevent interface for web pages is 100Mb/s ethernet. It would not be the slowest server on the internet.....

    3. Re:They'd make great controllers.. by LiENUS · · Score: 1

      100 mb/s wiring
      300kbps throughput i believe

    4. Re:They'd make great controllers.. by IWannaBeAnAC · · Score: 1

      Wasn't it 300kb/s for the serial controller?

    5. Re:They'd make great controllers.. by AnotherBrian · · Score: 1

      Speaking of cheap home electronic devices, how about wedging one into an Lego RCX unit or maybe another small box. I could see the geeks at HiTechnic putting one of these in a box of bricks and you could have like 16 inputs or outputs.

  15. pop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A speck of dust is all that remains after being slashdotted out of existence

  16. Re:Cool, this would solve the web server on the pl by odyrithm · · Score: 1

    no no, you cant do that silly.. read the article.. its rj45 in -> serial out.. so you can control things like toasters and kettles..

    --
    moo
  17. Annoying. by Dri · · Score: 0

    I read the doc to find out that there only was a Windows GUI Client. Still, nice tech.

    --
    Girls are strange. They don't come with a man page.
    -- Michael Mattsson
  18. big hairy deal by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    the Siteplayer is bigger but does more and is easily afforded by nearly anyone at $29.00 in SINGLE QUANTITIES so buy one and mess with it, make the first toaster with an IP address, 10baseT and a web interface (I did. though it was neat, then dismantled it because it was reallllly silly.)

    http://www.siteplayer.com/ is the place to go.

    If you cant buy the product in single quantities for a very reasonable price, then it's not worth messing with.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:big hairy deal by Selanit · · Score: 1
      . . . make the first toaster with an IP address . . .


      Too late.
    2. Re:big hairy deal by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Sorry, But I was talking a REAL toaster not some case mod.

      Mine made toast, that one might if it used an AMD processor, but I was able to display the temperature of the toasting chamber (thermocouple) and if it was in operation or not. I was going to go farther and interface to the digital electronics on the toaster's circuitboard (not a cheapie toaster, but a $65.00 electronic toaster) until I decided that this was a complete silly waste of time.

      Show me one that retains it's true function then i'll give up my crown, until then...

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    3. Re:big hairy deal by dissy · · Score: 1

      I just wanted to let you know I've been looking for a device like this for a couple weeks or so, and most of what I have found was as expencive (or more so) as the device in the main article.
      I only need maybe 10 of these things for around the house, so bulk pricing is out of the question.

      The siteplayer module looks to be perfect for what i want.. and $30 isnt bad at all concidering what you get.

      Thank you for the URL!
      --Jon

    4. Re:big hairy deal by fw3 · · Score: 3, Interesting
      the Siteplayer is bigger but does more and is easily afforded by nearly anyone at $29.00

      Not exactly comparable, yeah the siteplayer has some features.

      item SP Xport

      D i/o 8 3
      RAM 768B 256KB
      flash 48Kb 385KB

      Also the Xport includes the ethernet filter/magnetics and (Optionally) offers AES encryption, good feature if you want to use this for support on anything remotely critical.

      --
      Linux is Linux, if One need clarify their dist: <Dist>/GNU Linux
      bsds are of course just BSD
    5. Re:big hairy deal by Tingler · · Score: 1

      Sorry Lumpy,
      You can't put that crown on until you can show us some proof.

      Extravagant claims require extravagant evidence.......

    6. Re:big hairy deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      first toaster with an IP address

      Imagine that, I P in your toaster!

  19. The application by hhawk · · Score: 1

    You have some device which has a variety of data about it's operation. This lets' you store that data (for some period of time), let's others access this data, and could allow for some remote interaction.

    1) Yes or NO, Allow or Cancel

    2) It could be used in more interesting ways.

    a) Built into a Phone, it could download and store rates of various phone companies based on area code and time of day and then the phone could use this database to route your call to the beste carrier.

    b) Built into a device that used lots of energy (electrical or other types) it could download times when it was allowed or not allowed to be operated (based on over all usage in the system ((household, local, town-wide, or even on the reginal grid)).

    c) Built into devices in a hospital or an office, it would provide all sorts of data about the operational status of critical equipment.

    --
    http://www.hawknest.com/
    1. Re:The application by Nynaeve · · Score: 1
      a) Built into a Phone, it could download and store rates of various phone companies based on area code and time of day and then the phone could use this database to route your call to the beste carrier.

      PBX's already do this (Avaya calls it "Advanced Route Selection"). As for a home phone, using more than one carrier ala 10-10 dialing greatly complicates things since each carrer may tack on fees, etc.

    2. Re:The application by hhawk · · Score: 1

      Hopefully it could keep track of the fee(s) or use the ones without fees!

      --
      http://www.hawknest.com/
  20. The article (I hate PDF) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Ultra-Small Server Web-Enables Any System Providing access to a LAN or the Internet, a Web server squeezed in an RJ45 connector shroud packs a full TCP/IP stack and OS. As companies trim labor overheads, they~Rre looking to fill the void with remote diagnostics, maintenance, and data collection. One method is to Web-enable more systems to use the Internet and World Wide Web to collect data and diagnose or control systems. Webenabling typically meant adding a local-area network (LAN) interface, a controller, a software transmission- control-protocol/Internet-protocol (TCP/IP) stack, and other circuitry and software. Now, all that has been squeezed into the basic RJ-45 connector shroud (0.64 in. by 0.57 in. by 1.34 in.), which would typically be soldered to the pc board. All the circuit design and pc-board space the LAN circuitry requires is now eliminated. The Lantronix DSTni-XPort lets designers without any LAN/Internet experience create Internet-ready systems in minutes. Within the connector shroud, the DSTni-XPort packs the company~Rs DSTni-LX (an 80186-based controller), a 2-kbyte boot ROM, 256 kbytes of SRAM, 512 kbytes of flash memory, a 10/100 autosensing Ethernet transceiver, a high-speed serial port, three programmable I/O pins, bicolor LEDs for diagnostics, the LAN interface magnetics, and a full TCP/IP network stack and operating system (OS) . Thus, the XPort delivers a full device server in the space consumed by only the connector. Designed to operate from a 3.3- V supply, the XPort functions from -40C to 85C. It costs about $33 each in 10,000-unit lots. Lantronix Inc. www.lantronix.com (949) 453-3990

    1. Re:The article (I hate PDF) by itwerx · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the text.

      Now here's the caveat in the design:

      The power supply!

      Webserver = 0.64" x 0.57" x 1.34"
      Power-supply = 1.75" x 2" x 2.5" :)

    2. Re:The article (I hate PDF) by Black+Rabbit · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Doesn't look like there's a jack to plug it in, so I'm assuming that the thing runs off one of the lines in the ethernet cable, something like the way a phone is powered. Not knowing enough about some of the voltages and levels on that cable, is this a possibility, meaning that no dedicated "externa;" pwer supply is needed?

    3. Re:The article (I hate PDF) by mmol_6453 · · Score: 1

      It's mounted on a PC-board, so it probably gets its power from the device it's mounted in.

      --
      What's this Submit thingy do?
    4. Re:The article (I hate PDF) by Black+Rabbit · · Score: 1

      If it's mounted on a PC board, with presumably an external power supply, then it's somewhat larger than what the article tries to tell us. It's li9ke telling us that a computer is just the CPU, but without all the periphery that surrounds it, it's not much of a computer. So what's the point?

    5. Re:The article (I hate PDF) by mmol_6453 · · Score: 2, Informative

      According to the product's home page, the component is designed for embedded applications, not for being a standalone web server. It's intended as a means of remotely serving up diagnostics information over TCP/IP. It's not sophisticated enough to be an http server.

      --
      What's this Submit thingy do?
    6. Re:The article (I hate PDF) by PurpleFloyd · · Score: 1

      Um, it is an HTTP server. However, that's not that much harder than basic TCP/IP; HTML is just text. I doubt it's going to serve anything more than a textonly webpage with a status report and possibly the ability to remotely initiate diagnostics. Once you get TCP/IP, transferring text that has to conform to a few standards is easy. Just wrap it in <HTML> and <BODY> tags, and you have what is more or less a webpage that would display in most browsers.

      --

      That's it. I'm no longer part of Team Sanity.
    7. Re:The article (I hate PDF) by mmol_6453 · · Score: 1

      The problem is that there's not enough memory to hold anything sophisticated. So I don't think it's what comes to mind when people think of a web server.

      And I didn't notice it was an HTTP server. srry.

      --
      What's this Submit thingy do?
  21. Not a webserver by merlin_jim · · Score: 3, Informative

    I didn't see where this is a full webserver. The documentation seemed to indicate that it's a TCP/IP handler. You put serial data in one side and TCP/IP network packets come out the other side.

    At least, that's what it's targetted at; an addition to an existing embedded system. I don't think you could just write a backdoor and stick it on a network and expect it to work. Probably not enough memory/CPU capacity for that sort of thing...

    --
    I am disrespectful to dirt! Can you see that I am serious?!
    1. Re:Not a webserver by AEton · · Score: 1

      I didn't see where this is a full webserver. The documentation seemed to indicate that it's a TCP/IP handler.

      The brief indicates that this thingamajig has an internal web server which "serves Web pages and Java applets; it doesn't mention what the server software is (possibly proprietary, so you've got to worry about security updates unless it's open-source), but it claims to have 128-bit encryption support (hm, export restrictions). Cum grano salis: only 384 kilobytes of space and a 186 processor. So as a standalone server this thing obviously won't cut it, and as to claims of stealth, as far as I can tell it requires external power input, so no matter how tiny you'd probably notice the 120V AC -> 3.3V DC power adapter). Shame, because otherwise if it had Internet access it could make a decent sized Ethernet "repeater" with all sorts of exciting implications.

      --
      We recently had heard in the office over one of the Yellow Machine that's made by Anthology Solutions.
    2. Re:Not a webserver by IWannaBeAnAC · · Score: 1
      Why would you need a power adapter? Batteries have been around for quite a while now, although I admit the power consumption might be too high in practice.

      There surely are useful things a stand-alone web server could do, even if it only has 384KB data space and a slow processor. Not every site on the net is a high powered data hog. Its obviously designed around acting as a web interface for whatever is on the other end of the serial port though.

    3. Re:Not a webserver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want a full-featured web server, get the GoAhead WebServer. It's free, to boot.

    4. Re:Not a webserver by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      it's a TCP/IP handler. You put serial data in one side and TCP/IP network packets come out the other side.

      Awesome... I can build a dongle to hook up my TRS-80 to the Internet!

      Anyone ever write a web browser in BASIC before?

    5. Re:Not a webserver by jimmcq · · Score: 1

      I didn't see where this is a full webserver.

      Right here: "Embedded HTTP-compliant Web server"

    6. Re:Not a webserver by merlin_jim · · Score: 1

      Awesome... I can build a dongle to hook up my TRS-80 to the Internet!

      Anyone ever write a web browser in BASIC before?


      Sir I believe you would have a record on that one. :)

      Though this is I think more geared to web serving, it should have other capabilities.

      --
      I am disrespectful to dirt! Can you see that I am serious?!
    7. Re:Not a webserver by Nynaeve · · Score: 1

      A pity it doesn't use PoE (power over ethernet) like those nifty 3Com wall switches.

    8. Re:Not a webserver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, you forgot your obligatory link to everything2.com. ;)

  22. A House of Cables... by DasBub · · Score: 4, Funny

    Everyone suggests that these could be used in toasters, fridges, etc. etc... But would you actually run cables to all of these devices?

    I can just picture Old Man Stevens handing his wife a juicer for her birthday. Old Lady Stevens lets out a little sigh and grabs a crimper and a spool of Cat5.

    FIGHT THE FUTURE!

    1. Re:A House of Cables... by larien · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hrm, might be off the wall, but how about using the power cable? We already have the ability to do broadband over electricity wires, how about we simply use that technology in the home to web-enable these kind of devices? If a home doesn't have the setup already, no sweat, you just miss out on the extra features. If you do have it, you simply plug in your toaster/freezer/whatever and it gets a DHCP address and it's on the net!

    2. Re:A House of Cables... by cybermace5 · · Score: 1

      I see we've come full-circle back to X10.

      --
      ...
    3. Re:A House of Cables... by NewbieSpaz · · Score: 1

      But would you actually run cables to all of these devices?

      No, of course not. You'd hook up a wireless networking card or equivalent... ;-)

      --
      ------
      Random, useless fact: I type in startx entirely with my left hand.
    4. Re:A House of Cables... by jimmcq · · Score: 1

      Everyone suggests that these could be used in toasters, fridges, etc. etc... But would you actually run cables to all of these devices?

      Don't all of those devices already have a cable to the wall? Sure, its a power cable, but when Cat5 becomes that ubiquitous, then maybe we'll have as many Ethernet plugs in the house as we have electrical outlets.

    5. Re:A House of Cables... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two parents walk into the house and sees their beloved child half-electrocuted holding a blackened fork, and sees flames coming from a power outlet. They demand that the child explain what he was doing; he replied, "I wanted to experience porn off the Internet and forgot that I was grounded."

      The end.

    6. Re:A House of Cables... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      The difference being that X10 is extremely low-frequency and is unidirectional. X10 devices do not give feedback. There is also no guarantee of message delivery as a result. There is really no comparison to be made here.

      Putting networking over power lines is now done at high frequencies, and you can treat it more or less like 10b2 without a need for termination.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:A House of Cables... by MrChuck · · Score: 1
      Many X10 devices DO do two way comms.

      It's slow, DoS attacks are easy (from the neighbor who has SOMETHING that turns on the damn light (or worse, coffee maker) at 2AM) to those stupid motion sensors - if you have 5, the AC lines are too "clogged" to get wanted X10 over them.

      Signals can take 2 seconds to reach the device. Ouch.

      Right Answer: High Speed something over wireless or power to a real IP stack that can authenticate, perhaps encrypt and take an action.

    8. Re:A House of Cables... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She's going to run a web server on her vibrator?

  23. No prob by ceeam · · Score: 1

    A hub looking like a hedgehog.

    1. Re:No prob by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With a 300kbps backbone? Ugh.

  24. Hrmmmm by Havokmon · · Score: 1
    Downside is that the serial interface to the controller tops out at 300 kbps, but for $33 (in 10K quantities) it's a cool, easy way to net-enable just about anything."

    Sounds like an experience I had about 10 years ago.. I blew the removable flash bios chip on a motherboard. :( So after calling manufacturers all over the place, I managed to find one that sold the chips in qtys' of one.

    "Great!", I thought. "This will be easy."

    Two weeks later, and some after some head-scratching, I realized I was the feeling-silly owner of a brand-new, BLANK, flash bios chip.

    "it's a cool, easy way to net-enable just about anything."

    I'd suggest editing the comment, 'Easy' is relative.

    --
    "I can't give you a brain, so I'll give you a diploma" - The Great Oz (blatently stolen sig)
    1. Re:Hrmmmm by fruey · · Score: 1
      Yeah well you can fix that. You'd have to flash it with the right BIOS instructions anyway, and there's no way a chip manufacturer would know what BIOS to flash on there (nor would it be worth their while to do it)

      There are some good bios rescue techniques. There's an Open BIOS flashing project, if you're interested then I can get you the URL. Worked to flash upgrade my BIOS where the original MoBo mfr tool didn't work, and has some pretty cool other options too.

      --
      Conversion Rate Optimisation French / English consultant
    2. Re:Hrmmmm by c_oflynn · · Score: 1

      I'd suggest editing the comment, 'Easy' is relative. Easy? That thing is super-easy! If you didn't have something like that you would have to write your own TCP/IP stack that could fit in your target microcontroller, setup the physical link, and all this other stuff. Sure you can get some TCP/IP stacks for microcontrollers for free or low cost, but there is still a lot of work. A serial interface couldn't be easier. Most microcontrollers have some sort of hardware serial interface built in hardware, which makes it easy to use! Downside is that the serial interface to the controller tops out at 300 kbps That seems pretty fast to me! 300 kbits a second is way more then you need for what these things are designed for. BTW for those who think these things will be useless, here are some applications: -in office use lets employees log onto a webpage to see who is in the office or not -datalogger that remotely lets one get the data -making a LAN with these things for something like a security system (who says it has to connect to the internet) -remote control of equipment There are lots more applications, and there are other devices like this (SitePlayer comes to mind). -Colin

    3. Re:Hrmmmm by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      well, nowadays sourcing bios replacement chips is easy, and having them pre-flashed with bios of your choice is easy too.

      btw, if you had an computer with working bios that was the same size as the bios that was f***red, and if you could get the bios flasher(don't know how easy to obtain 10y ago, probably possible but a bit bitchy to get), you could flash that bios on the working computer as you can 'hot swap' the bios chips and thus use the working computer as a flasher.

      some overclockers/computer junkies get spare bios chips and flash them just in case they corrupt the one on the motherboard.

      it is 'easy' to net-enable things with this, if you are a professional i guess.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  25. What would be cool.. by odyrithm · · Score: 1

    a wireless version of this.. now that would be intergrated ;)

    --
    moo
  26. cool by JeanBaptiste · · Score: 5, Funny

    but dead flies are smaller, cheaper, and in greater abundance :)

  27. But cables are so 2002! by HelbaSluice · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...it's a cool, easy way to net-enable just about anything.

    Which is fine, but the REAL killer device will be an embeddable, commodity-level wireless interface--whether 802.11 or its successor--paired with ubiquitous wireless access, at least on par with current digital cell service. I estimate we're only a few years away from the latter, and the former is already more or less available in the PCMCIA form factor.

    When my toaster oven can download Pop-Tart-warming instructions from its manufacturer's website without an additional cable to the wall, that'll be something.

  28. linux kernel by upt1me · · Score: 1

    is there room on that thing for the linux kernel?

  29. Pulls over 200 mills! by rabryn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is a great product but it pulls over 200 mills, not so great for low power embedded work.

    1. Re:Pulls over 200 mills! by Matt_Bennett · · Score: 4, Informative

      You're going to have a hard time doing a 100Mbit interface that is truly "low power." With 100Mbit, there is always something going over the link, putting +/- 1V over a 100 ohm load, counting inefficiences, you're probably at 40 mA just to support the TX portion of the PHY. Then you have to realize that you need a 125 MHz clock going on inside-and that's all before you have a MAC and a processor going. Ethernet (particularly 100Mb) is not a low power interface.

    2. Re:Pulls over 200 mills! by rabryn · · Score: 1

      I understand that there is a minimum amount of power required to support a 100Mbit interface, but the processor that is used in the Lantronix part is a 80186, I don't recall those being touted as "low power." I've seen products that can do a better job that have lower current consumption than this thing.

    3. Re:Pulls over 200 mills! by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Hell, you could draw quite a bit of power from the ethernet. Not a problem.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  30. Stealth... by dmayle · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What this could really use is a pass-through ethernet hub built into the device, so that you can drop it in-line with a cable in place of some existing connecter...

    1. Re:Stealth... by AnotherScratchMonkey · · Score: 1
      Sort of like those little cigarette-sized keyboard spies.

      You'd need two of these back-to-back, with some smarts in the middle. (Does the thing auto-sense polarity or can you get it in a null-cable version?) In a typical environment, it would need a DHCP client to get its own address and a DHCP relay to pass requests for the box it's "hubbing" (really proxying) for.

    2. Re:Stealth... by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 1
      There's three user programmable I/O lines. Connect that to a small FPGA, and the possibilities are endless. You can do just about anything you want with a 3-wire interface. Heck, 2 wires is enough for things like I2C and SMBus, but three makes life a little easier.

      I'm demanding my boss order me a developer kit.

      --
      --- Ban humanity.
  31. Samples? by ndecker · · Score: 0

    Do they ship samples?

  32. Please spare us for once... by psoriac · · Score: 1

    Please spare us, can people NOT post the requisite "their webserver must have been hosted on one of these" comments that this type of story always brings out like worms after a shower?

    --
    I browse Slashdot at +3, Funny
    1. Re:Please spare us for once... by keller · · Score: 1
      Please spare us, can people NOT post the requisite "their webserver must have been hosted on one of these" comments that this type of story always brings out like worms after a shower?


      NO!

      --

      Enig? Det alt for hot det smor!

  33. Re:I know I'm gonna get flamed for this... by TobyWong · · Score: 2, Insightful


    Then don't think of fridges think of ovens. DL a new recipe and the oven will take care of all the temperature adjustments and timing you just put your food in and press 'GO'.

    The applications are only limited by your imagination.

    --
    - Toby
  34. HTTP - Nice and Simple by fastdecade · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Technology likes this really shows off how useful an open, ASCII-based, protocol can be.

    1. Re:HTTP - Nice and Simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Well actually, in my experience, an open -binary- protocol can be implemented faster and in fewer instructions. If you're not fooling around with linebreaks and whitespace, but instead you can say "Read the next 56 bytes into -this- data structure-" and maybe change the byte-order of the numeric data, you save yourself the trouble of parsing the data and checking for syntactic accuracy.

      I'm not proposing that HTTP should have been a binary protocol...ASCII is great, but not because it makes it easy to implement. It's easy to understand, to debug, to monitor, to describe, and to share. But not necessarily to write.

    2. Re:HTTP - Nice and Simple by evilviper · · Score: 1

      I'm not a big fan of HTTP... Lots of overhead, no state, little control, and a crappy auth mechanism. FTP puts HTTP to shame in may ways. The problem with FTP is in it's connection negotiation, yet, FTP remains incredibly popular, saying volumes about the limitations of HTTP.

      Simple is good most of the time, but just being simple does not make HTTP good.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  35. Tell Me Something by aardwolf64 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's a web server with an RJ45 port. How exactly will that "net-enable just about anything"?

    Sure, you can plug a webserver into anything that happens to have an existing RJ45 port, but what use would that be? (Just what I've always wanted... a web server that I can plug into my laptop so I can browse the web at a blazing 300k/sec.)

    I want to net-enable my car. Someone tell me how this RJ45 device will allow that. My car doesn't even have an RJ45 port...

    1. Re:Tell Me Something by Hrothgar+The+Great · · Score: 1

      You'd have to build the interface yourself. That's kind of the whole point of the product. If you're some enterprising (and weird) hardware company, you could buy 100,000 of these things and build some bizarre web-server-enabled appliance and sell them to the general public.

    2. Re:Tell Me Something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The RJ-45 if for browsing TO the device. For capturing the data that will be "browsed" you use the 300kb serial interface, connected to your device/controller.

    3. Re:Tell Me Something by kyrre · · Score: 1

      No. You connect to you device using the serial connector of the RJ45 port. The RJ45 webserver then communicate with the device according to a program you write for it.

    4. Re:Tell Me Something by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Informative
      If you have the know-how, which is to say, you are capable of putting something in between this device's serial interface, and the serial interface on your car (OBD-I, OBD-II, CAM A, CAM B, CAM C) then you can net-enable your car. If you are not capable of building a little computer to do that, or grafting this onto an existing little computer which speaks the appropriate protocol, and such devices do exist, or writing software to run on the xport's operating system, then you probably cannot make it happen.

      However: If you can find a device which speaks CAM or OBD or whatever and sends the codes out over a serial line, which is actually highly likely, then you probably would only have to write software, and add a DC-DC power supply and a serial connector to the xport, and plug it in. This is so trivial that any person capable of working on auto electrical (if you are not, you have not tried, or you are handicapped) should be able to do it. Consider: The device provides a 3-wire serial port capable of speeds up to 230kbps. (While the number 300kbps has been kicked around, the PDF spec sheet clearly says 230.) It says it will do hardware handshaking, and that it has three user configurable pins. At this point it seems to me that if you want to do hardware handshaking, you won't get to use those pins for something else. I'm looking for documentation which will make this more clear. Bah, I give up, I don't think they have a data sheet available, just marketing literature.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:Tell Me Something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want to net-enable my car. Someone tell me how this RJ45 device will allow that. My car doesn't even have an RJ45 port.

      When you wire this component into your car's control circuitry, it will.

      Who moderates a posting like this up as "insightful"? A post that asks where a circuit-board component will plug into one's car just indicates that the poster didn't actually look at (or didn't understand) the product description.

  36. Question by Quill_28 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I fully admit that my understanding of electronics is pretty weak, and I am confused.

    I don't get it?
    Everyone keeps talking about how you can hook up your toaster, coffee maker, etc. Do these devices have a serial port?
    How would one interface with any of these kind of devices unless they had some sort of output interface?

    I can see where these might work well with older legacy devices(printers, etc), and you want to be able put them on a network, but I fail to see how they would help in your home.

    Enlightment anyone?

    1. Re:Question by EnglishTim · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I think the idea is that people who produce things like TVs, Refrigerators, water heaters etc... could easily intergrate these things into their products for a minimal cost. So, you can have your iRefrigerator and plug a network cable in it, and it can now email you when it runs out of ice, or someone leaves the door open, or it needs de-icing. You could point your webserver at it and get a reading of the current temperature, how much ice it has etc...

      You could put these things in drink kiosks so that they can email you when they're almost out of Dr. Pepper.

      I can't see why you'd want one in a toaster, though...

    2. Re:Question by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 1
      The RJ-45 widget IS the coinnection. You could put all your applicances on your LAN. Your Ethernet would plug right into this thing, and it's small enough to fit into a toaster.

      I'd be more interested in having web based interfaces to my Tivo, TV, stereo and other home theater stuff. I think the toaster example is not intended to be taken seriously.

      I tried to come up with a "cereal" port joke, but just couldn't. Sorry.

      --
      --- Ban humanity.
    3. Re:Question by jmacleod9975 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't know much about this. But your question makes sense to me. I mean I own a toaster and hooking up a webserver to it would be pretty pointless because my toaster does not have a little computer with AtoD converters to keep track of the temperature or little electronic switches to control whether the toast pops up. It is all analog and mechanical. So for this to be useful in my toaster I would need to also have a little embedded controller with sensors and activators and stuff. I think it will be much more complicated and expensive than sticking one of these in my toaster.

    4. Re:Question by Croaker · · Score: 4, Informative

      You'd need additional hardware to wire up something like a toaster, which itself generally doesn't have electronics in it. Web enabling your toaster is a bit of hyperbole.

      However, as a home user, you could bash together something with these. Say you have an electronic thermometer that has a serial output. Attach one of these doodads and voila! You now have a web-enabled thermomemter. Stick it in the toaster. Now your toaster is web-enabled! (err... sorta) I can't think of many common appliances around that have serial ports on them. I guess my TiVo is the only one I can think of, that I own.

      These are aimed at the manufacturer of the thermometer, however. They could take the existing design that has a serial port, add in one of these modules, and release their new iThermometer that's networkable, at a low engineering cost. They can probably tag $100 onto the price, easily swallowing the $33/module cost and making themselves a nice profit in addition. There's tons of industrial equipment out there that has serial ports, which means they need to be within 30 feet or so of a PC. With these, you can have a whole network of machines tying into a single PC which is capable of monitoring an entire factory.

      I suspect any manufacturer of actual web-enabled coffeemakers, toasters, etc. would skip the serial interface (and $33 overhead) and instead just get some off-the-shelf integrated TCI/IP chip.

      Personally, I'd love to get one of these things and web-enable my old Apple //c (although this particular model is a bit pokey at 300 baud).

    5. Re:Question by Quill_28 · · Score: 1

      But how does the ethernet interface with your toaster, stereo, etc?

      Or is this for the stereo manufacture to put in his stereo product?

    6. Re:Question by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 1
      Or is this for the stereo manufacture to put in his stereo product?

      Bingo!

      --
      --- Ban humanity.
    7. Re:Question by green+pizza · · Score: 1

      I can't think of many common appliances around that have serial ports on them. I guess my TiVo is the only one I can think of, that I own.

      As this gizmo is designed for manufacturers to integrate in their new products, it's not really designed for the home user to just plug into a serial line. If you were to stick one of these to your TiVo, I can guarantee you that it's not going to work without significant software hackery.

      However... if you're handy, and know how to work with microcontrollers (68hc12, basic stamp, etc) you can web-enable almost any electronic device in your home by linking the webserver to the uController and the uController's A/D circuits to your appliance. Write some simple software and away you go. Linking up your dish washer, vcr, and modern toaster isn't all that hard if you have the proper (affordable) parts.

    8. Re:Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I can't see why you'd want one in a toaster, though...

      Why, of course so that the toaster can email you when it's almost out of Dr. Pepper. What else?

    9. Re:Question by CaseyB · · Score: 1
      I can't see why you'd want one in a toaster, though...

      Toaster is obvious. It sends out a broadcast packet when the toast pops up, and your home server plays a "Toast is ready" alert over the central sound system.

    10. Re:Question by SharkJumper · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I can't see why you'd want one in a toaster, though...

      It's obvious. To predict the weather!

      http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/2/19442.htm l

    11. Re:Question by spdrfnx · · Score: 1

      Well, in addition to the serial port that is on this thing, a few of the pins can be used for sensored IO, or like binary signals. So at a very rudimentary level, someone could hook one of these pins up to the Light on their fridge, or the heating wires on their toaster, and with out any serial ASCII output, you could get a very basic ON / OFF reading. Couple that with a little bit of databasing & timing software, and you could have appliances track their own energy useage.

      just an idea... I'd be more usefull if I could get my kitchen to e-mail me my breakfast.

      grey

    12. Re:Question by Scooter · · Score: 1

      I can't think of many common appliances around that have serial ports on them. I guess my TiVo is the only one I can think of, that I own.

      The A'Pexi PFC engine management computer in my car has a serial port :) (well actually it's the DataLogit box that plugs into the service port on the PFC that has the serial port). If I stuck one of these gadgets on the end of that I could make a web interface to the PFC with stuff like engine speed, water temp, water pressure, oil temp, pressure, manifold pressure intake temp.. ooo. With a wireless adapter in it, I could get the stats.. er.. from 300metres away (not sure where I'm goign with this :-/ )

      Right now I'm looking at building a Mini ITX machine to display this on a small LCD monitor.

    13. Re:Question by morcheeba · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, this is 300k baud - much faster than the //c can handle. If you wrote the code in assembly (running with a 1 MHz clock and 4 cycles per instruction), the tightest code ("LDA $C1FF; LDA $C1FF; etc.") wouldn't keep up -- and that doesn't even do anything with the data! Ah, nostalgia. I remember how the //c couldn't scroll the screen reliably at 2400 baud - it's amazing how far things have come, especially when I DMA stuff at a gigabit/sec to/from a RAID.

    14. Re:Question by MrChuck · · Score: 1
      Or find a used old PDA.

      I was given a Psion 3 that's got IrDA, serial and a programming language. My P3 died LONG LONG ago and is now a zaurus.

      As a generic terminal, it was great.

      LCD. Serial. Built. Not ugly (ok, no ducttape and "hold that wire" of home hackery).

    15. Re:Question by Polo · · Score: 1

      Actually, a lot of toasters nowadays ARE electronic.

      Just as an example, take a look at http://www.sears.com under housewares -> small kitchen appliances -> toasters.

      Even if they don't have "digital" or "electronic" in the name, if you dig into the specifications, at least half of them have electronic controls, maybe more.

  37. Proof at last! by docbrown42 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Imagine being able to check on the temparature of your fridge over the internet. Even install a web cam inside it.

    That would be SO cool! I'd finally be able to get the PROOF of the existance of the little guy who turns on and off the light in my fridge!

    --
    Ed Wedig
    Graphic design services
    docbrown.net
    1. Re:Proof at last! by 1st1 · · Score: 1

      Great, that will make fridges cheaper!

      Because the camera is looking all the time the little guy will no longer need to turn off the light . So we can save whatever salary the little guy gets.

      --
      NullPointerException
    2. Re:Proof at last! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but when the light goes out, it will be all black, and you still won't be able to see him!

  38. Toasters! by clbyjack81 · · Score: 1

    Now I really CAN be root on your toaster. Isn't technology wonderful?

    --
    Cole's Axiom: The sum of the intelligence on the planet is a constant. The population is growing.
  39. Re:I know I'm gonna get flamed for this... by Zone-MR · · Score: 1

    That depends on how its implemented. Home automation can be a huge convenience - or if implemented badly, a huge inconvenience.

    I have a custom made system. I can control garden lights, alarms, etc from a Windows CE based panel built into the kitchen wall. You may ask why. Well if it was just to control a light or two then theres no point.

    But I can at a glance see if ive left any windows open around the house before going to sleep, turn off the garden and home lights and turn on the alarm at a press of the button. I can click a button and see a logfile of all numbers that called while ive been away. I can select an MP3 and have the speakers throught the house gently play in in the background. It may seem like an expensive and unneccesary luxury, but advancments in networking such as this web server are making it a cheap reallity.

  40. Hacked my toaster ! by bushboy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Damn scr1p7 k19913s hacked my toaster - now all it serves up is toast with burn marks that reads "r00ted ya"

    --
    A slashdotting - you get the stick first and then the carrot !
  41. Not as funny as it sounds. by dmaxwell · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Food service organizations must regularly monitor and log the temperature of their refrigerators. If one is off for any reason, the Health Department gets verrrrry testy. A net enabled device to check the temp does not substitute for showing up in person with a thermometer. However, this would allow them to spot trouble brewing before the health inspectors find it.

  42. That's not a 16 port hub by cyber_rigger · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's my Beowulf Cluster. :^)

  43. Automated home by fearlezz · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Cool! Just imagine what you can do with that For instance:
    • Having your lights switched by the computer
    • Your microwave starts making food when crond tells it to
    • Log when people ring the doorbell
    • Automatically switch off all lights when you press a master switch when leaving the house
    I'll bookmark it. If the price ever decreases to less than $30 a piece, I'll consider to buy some.
    --
    .sig: No such file or directory
    1. Re:Automated home by TheEnglishPatient · · Score: 1

      At first I thought this post was goig to be funny but then I realised it was serious.

      You can do all these things already - How does this help?

      N

    2. Re:Automated home by fearlezz · · Score: 1

      probably you can already... if you have a whole lot of knowledge of electronics. :) I don't, but I think I can integrate this baby.

      --
      .sig: No such file or directory
    3. Re:Automated home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Logging the doorbell is easy. I did it for a number of years, since the infrastructure was already in place.

      1. Run wire from doorbell to X-10 "burglar alarm interface" transmitter

      2. Plug in X-10 computer interface

      3. Write code to listen to X-10 signals and call external things (shell scripts, anyone?)

      4. Write a shell script to do whatever

      In my case, #4 threw some data at sendmail, and I heard the doorbell on my pager. I could hear that doorbell ring anywhere in the state as a result.

      Steps #1 and #2 had already been done for other reasons - 'hearing' the doorbell downstairs where the original bell wouldn't reach. The rest was obvious.

    4. Re:Automated home by CutterDeke · · Score: 1

      Having your lights switched by the computer
      Your microwave starts making food when crond tells it to


      How about using one of those timers that plugs into an outlet. They're very cheap. Also, don't forget "the Clapper".

      Log when people ring the doorbell

      Why? Either I'm there and I can answer the door (if I feel like it) or I'm away and it doesn't really matter unless I know who rang the doorbell. Also, the server is susceptible to DDoS (doorbell denial of service) attacks from those punk kids down the street.

      Automatically switch off all lights when you press a master switch when leaving the house

      Two solutions here: kids and the master switch on the circuit breaker panel. Although kids are a lot more expensive, and the other requires you to reset all your plugged in clocks.

    5. Re:Automated home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've used a couple of other Lantronix products, ten UDS-10's and a MSS100 and ethernet enabled our own Dynet(TM) serial (RS-485) devices to allow us to control ten bus stations here in Brisbane, Australia. We had the Dynalite devices already installed for some time as stand-alone stations, being controlled by network timeclocks which are able to send out network messages to turn lights (big-ass ones!) on and off at will. The stations already were connected via fibre ethernet for CCTV functionality and other things, once we added a UDS-10 to each station as an ethernet to serial tranceiver, we added an MSS100, built up a routing table to the statically assigned IP's used by the UDS-10's and now we can access all stations from the one central control point via software - being able to switch on mebbe 50 channels of 10A per channel lights (big-ass) and *see* the lights come on via the CCTV system after a mouse click, knowing those lights are some 18km away is cool. I can telnet into the UDS-10's or just point a browser at them to change settings... however once it's done, it all happens via serial Dynet commands as far as we're concerned. No link on their website to say this is in place because it's not completely finished yet... but it's been working (almost) faultlessly since just before Christmas 2002. If they had internet access to their LAN which wasn't firewalled off, heck, I could VNC into their server remotely and cheerfully start playing tic-tac-toe with a LOT of amperes, might be an amusing thing to do on a nice clear, but dark, summers night while wirelessly connected with my laptop sitting on a suitable vantage point so I could see ALL ten stations. 'Course I'd never even *think* of doing such a thing. Cheers, The TonkMasta.

  44. Web server? Who needs a web server? by DickBreath · · Score: 1

    This would be an ideal platform for running a password capturing packet sniffer. Then the software could then IRC you the captured passwords, or it could auto-compromise other boxes on the lan and make them do it. Too bad about the pricetag. We need more inexpensive platforms suitable for this particular application.

    --

    I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
  45. imagine the possibilities by t0ny · · Score: 2, Interesting
    wow, slap some kind of protocol analyser in them too, and you have instant security breach. Taking industrial espionage to a whole new level.

    And you could also make one wireless... I think the only thing limiting you could be power consumption. But having a wall wart plugged into one of these under somebody's desk- that seems doable.

    --

    Manipulate the moderator system! Mod someone as "overrated" today.

    1. Re:imagine the possibilities by jxs2151 · · Score: 1
      the only thing limiting you could be power consumption

      Not to fear- Technology to the rescue

      Check out the latest in Power Over Ethernet (POE):

      Google News search for power over ethernet

  46. add a wireless lan interface to it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    and we have the ultimate spy-device. heck, this ain't using any bandwidth, is super small and can transmit its findings via W-lan to the receiver in that unmarked white van outside the office building. that thing is powered via the network-interface, so no need for batteries or anything.

    now if you only could produce such a thing in a form factor like a plug, not a socket, you wouldn't even need cable to spy on the network. just plug it in some unused office in the building or in a spare network outlet somewhere in the offices, no one will notice that. can be put secretly in place by the cleaning maid, can spy forever, can hardly be detected.

  47. Re:Cool, this would solve the web server on the pl by gosand · · Score: 1
    e I think an aeroplane would be better off using a rj45 in the chair arm, and now they can squish the server in there too. Now we just have to solve how to connect it to the rest of the internet without interferring with the navigation systems and anti missile targetting.

    Actually, couldn't they just have a webserver on board, and cache several sites, like news sites, etc. People wouldn't be able to browse the internet, but they would be able to browse something. That doesn't allow people to email, but it would be something. I am sure the airlines could sell advertising for the hosted web pages. It seems feasable.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  48. Re:Scam by nochops · · Score: 3, Informative

    Where does it say that the device is running Windows? All I could find is that there's a Windows based configuration utility, and a Windows based com port redirector.

    --
    "A terrorist is someone who has a bomb but doesn't have an air force." -William Blum
  49. Yes it is a web server by IWannaBeAnAC · · Score: 5, Informative
    From the product description link, helpfully included in the main story...

    Although it is smaller than your thumb, the XPort contains all of the hardware and software required to Web-enable any device, including:

    10Base-T/100Base-TX auto-sensing Ethernet connection
    Mature, robust operating system
    Embedded HTTP-compliant Web server
    Programmable e-mail alerts
    Extensive networking protocol suite including full TCP/IP stack
    128-bit AES Rijndael encryption

    1. Re:Yes it is a web server by merlin_jim · · Score: 1

      So what's it's memory capacity? Can you load custom software into it? Does it operate in a stand-alone mode? These are the questions that were not answered for me.

      Just because it's connected to the internet and has an http stack with a few cgi scripts does not make it a web server, in my opinion. A web server is more than pushing html out to the internet. A web server is a way of interacting with users in a manner that is meaningful to your business. I'm not seeing that here.

      --
      I am disrespectful to dirt! Can you see that I am serious?!
    2. Re:Yes it is a web server by finkployd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A web server is more than pushing html out to the internet. A web server is a way of interacting with users in a manner that is meaningful to your business.

      You are confusing market-speak with technical terms.

      Market-speak - Webserver: A way to meaningfuly interact with your customers and aid in b2b information exchange.

      Technical term - Webserver: Software that responds to web browser requests by returning html.

      Actually, now that I think about it, your defination of a webserver is actually an "application server" (think tomcat, coldfusion, websphere, etc). Those still require a webserver to serve up the html.

      Finkployd

    3. Re:Yes it is a web server by IWannaBeAnAC · · Score: 2, Informative
      From the product brief, the CPU is a 48MHz x86-compatible with 256KB SRAM and 512KB Flash RAM. It will run telnet, so I guess you can connect to it and run programs on it in the usual way.

      I suspect those specs are good enough to max out the ethernet connection, under normal circumstances.

      I don't know what you mean by "stand-alone mode". From reading the product description, I can see no reason why you couldn't just plug it into an existing network and have it start serving pages, if that is what you mean. The intention is clearly to interact with some other device through the serial interface though.

    4. Re:Yes it is a web server by invenustus · · Score: 1

      I still don't get it. The site makes no mention of storage space.... what does it serve? Once it's on my network, do I SSH/telnet/ftp/whatever into it and upload files that way?

      --
      grep -ri 'should work' /usr/src/linux | wc -l
    5. Re:Yes it is a web server by IWannaBeAnAC · · Score: 1
      The storage space is 256KB RAM and 512KB Flash.

      Its clearly not going to function very well as a secret pr0n server, but you can fit quite a lot of html in 512+256KB (compressed, if need be).

      If you're using it as a web interface for some embedded device (weather monitor, for example?) how much space do you need?

    6. Re:Yes it is a web server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Technical term - Webserver: Software that responds to web browser requests by returning html.

      Technical term - Webserver: An application program that accepts connections in order to service requests by sending back responses. Any given program may be capable of being both a client and a server; our use of these terms refers only to the role being performed by the program for a particular connection, rather than to the program's capabilities in general. Likewise, any server may act as an origin server, proxy, gateway, or tunnel, switching behavior based on the nature of each request.[1]

      Also note the definitions of request as per the referenced pae (an HTTP compliant message). I'd summarize by defining webserver as "something that speaks and services the server side of HTTP".

      [1] http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec1.h tml#sec1.3

    7. Re:Yes it is a web server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a very small thumb.

  50. Re:Scam by Andre060 · · Score: 1

    Jellomizer's post is an "ovious lie" ;-)

    Andre060

  51. Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, but does it run GNU/Linux?

  52. Cool but... by dark-br · · Score: 1

    i would rather use a fly

  53. In perspective.. by nolife · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Downside is that the serial interface to the controller tops out at 300 kbps, but for $33 (in 10K quantities) it's a cool, easy way to net-enable just about anything."

    The size is a big factor but there are already full blown devices that can do far more then this and are cheaper. Take a look at some DSL/Cable routers. Siemens sells one that is a 10/100 4 port switch, web interface and control, printer port, firewall, etc... for $19 and $28. Many SMC barricades and Linksys models are going for under $40. These devices might not fit into a toaster but I know they could be made smaller. I know comparing these to the articles product is not apples to apples but there are cheaper and more robust web and network enabled devices already out on the street.

    --
    Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    1. Re:In perspective.. by Matt_Bennett · · Score: 1
      These devices might not fit into a toaster but I know they could be made smaller.


      It's going to be really hard to make a whole jack/magnetics/controller/processor much smaller. You've got the absolute limitation of the RJ45, plus the magnetics- which is absolutely necessary for ethernet. You can get pretty close with capacitive isolation, but you're probably never going to be fully compliant with the IEEE spec. This device has contained in something about the size of a ethernet integrated mag/jack that has the whole shebang- pretty good.

  54. What part of... by Mr.+Moose · · Score: 1

    ..."Embedded HTTP-compliant Web server" don't You understand? Read the Product info.

    1. Re:What part of... by merlin_jim · · Score: 1

      I don't see how this:

      "How the XPort Can Transform Your Product

      Once it is out in the marketplace, a device which includes a fully integrated XPort can provide the following:
      Interactive data communications to and from the device through a standard Internet browser (using Java applets)
      System software upgrades via the Internet
      Remote configuration, monitoring, and troubleshooting, including real-time device performance notification via e-mail alerts
      A dedicated co-processor to optimize network activities, permitting the host microprocessor to function at maximum efficiency "

      Counts as a web server, from the sense of "this is something I can jack into my network without additional hardware and get useful functions out of" Now if you have another device hooked up to it, yeah that's a useful thing.

      Unless there's something in the PDF that indicates this can function standalone, I am not impressed.

      Unfortunately I cannot read PDFs or I would've checked it out myself.

      --
      I am disrespectful to dirt! Can you see that I am serious?!
  55. Serial port NOT limited to 300kbps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FYI

    If you read the product PDF from Lantronics, on the second page it states:

    Serial Interface ...
    Data Rates: 300 to 230 kbps


    ..Thought you'd like to know

    mlongval@drlongval.com

  56. Government-approved, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Spec sheet on manufacturer's web site here says:
    "Encryption for secure communications - 128-bit AES US Government approved Rijndael"

    Does Government-approved mean what I think it means ?

  57. SETI! by NetNinja · · Score: 1

    Ahh More SETI units!!

  58. Why? by Epsillon · · Score: 1

    Is everything with ethernet suddenly a "web server" to /.? It's an ethernet transceiver with TCP/IP, not a frigging web server, OK?

    --
    Resistance is futile. Reactance buggers it up.
    1. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, yes, it's an ethernet tranciever with TCP/IP, but it also happens to serve http from 512k of embedded flash. That would make it a webserver, no?

    2. Re:Why? by Tidal+Flame · · Score: 1

      "Embedded HTTP-compliant Web server" I dunno, I'd tend to call it a server if it's got that...

    3. Re:Why? by Epsillon · · Score: 1
      Well, yes, it's an ethernet tranciever with TCP/IP, but it also happens to serve http from 512k of embedded flash. That would make it a webserver, no?

      Um, yes. (/me goes off into a corner to die) Didn't see that. Sorry, chaps! I guess I had an off day ;o)

      --
      Resistance is futile. Reactance buggers it up.
  59. Agreed... by green+pizza · · Score: 1

    Most security-concious businesses do not active ports on their switches until both A) a request is put in by the right people and B) the MAC address on the machine at the other end has been verified. Modern managed switches can be easily configured to only talk to a single predetermined MAC address per port.

    Granted there is still the possibility of MAC address spoofing, but this prevents most hurried "Dreamcast Planters". A much greater threat comes from open WAPs, weak firewall, and weak passwords.

  60. Security Risk by PSL · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Imagine how easy it would be to hide one of these on a corporate network? Backdoor to anything.

    --

    "Times may change, but standards must remain the same." - George Carlin.
  61. manufacturers dont sell 1 by 1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    Most manufacturers sell by the thousands (or tens or even hundreds of thousands) to wholesalers, who sell by the hundreds or thousands to retailers, who then themselves actually sell one by one to the end user.

    There is your answer to, "What you say?!? Who would buy 10,000?" which everyone keeps asking.

    That is not unlike expecting Fyffes to send you an individual banana direct to your home from South America.

  62. Fieldbus technology by phrantic · · Score: 2, Informative

    Factory automation has been involved with web enabling control processes for several years, albeit with less focus on web based goodies and more on the actual control of distributed peripherals.
    In the good old days control of an Auto plant, chemical plant, anything at all that required PLC (programmable logic controllers), all of the i/o was driven by units that attached directly to the PLC-CPU unit. This was all very well but from there you then had to run power cables the tens of metres to whatever valves or motor you wanted to control, the routing of power cables is more strictly regulated that data cables.
    Some bright spark came up with the idea that if you distributed the i/o placing it right beside the motor or whatever and ran a high speed communication link over data lines this would be eaiser to manage. Things got more interesting when you add the web to the equation, and some of the big guns toyed with the idea of serving java applets allowing centrally located controllers to download the applets that visualised and controlled the remote (anything from metres to 1000's of Kilometres) equipment and to control it from there.

    The draw back to this is that if it is on the web then there is subject to attacked, by iraqi's or script kiddies.

    --
    --My sig is bigger than your sig--
  63. cabling by IAR80 · · Score: 1

    This is the death of structured cabling companies.

    --
    http://ebgp.net/ccc/
  64. Sounds like a great new way to make a Dongle :-( by bobgap · · Score: 3, Informative

    Nuf said.

  65. modern toasters by green+pizza · · Score: 1

    my toaster does not have a little computer with AtoD converters to keep track of the temperature or little electronic switches to control whether the toast pops up. It is all analog and mechanical.

    Many newer models of toasters are electronically controlled, and have been for several years. These typically cost $45 and up. The average $15 Walmart special will still be the analog/mechanical type and will probably never be web-enabled at that price.

    1. Re:modern toasters by DickBreath · · Score: 1

      Many newer models of toasters are electronically controlled, and have been for several years.

      I've got a 10+ year old toaster that is electronically controlled. If you watch it carefully (almost too closely than is safe), you can tell it keeps cycling power on and off to the heating elements to keep them at a certian temperature. It does NOT just control the length of time the toast is in the toaster, it controls the heating elements temperature, apparently.

      Alas, it is not internet enabled. If it were, it could page my cell phone when the toast is ready.

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
  66. Good point. by torpor · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sorry, but in this business "$30/piece" is *NOT* cheap.

    Wake me up when they're selling them at $1 a piece in quantities of 10k, then we'll see a revolution ...

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    1. Re:Good point. by stilwebm · · Score: 3, Interesting

      These will initially be targeted at higher margin items. A poster suggested a clothes washer that could send you an email when it is finished washing a load. This wouldn't appear in a Roper (about a 4% margin), but more likely a Kennmore Elite or Maytag Neptune. A refrigertator with online access to temperature and enegry usage graphs is more likely to be a $3999 SubZero than a $399 GE. The good thing about this product is that as more people use it, pricing will drop and it will work its way down to mid-range products where the margins are thinner.

    2. Re:Good point. by Tackhead · · Score: 4, Insightful
      > This wouldn't appear in a Roper (about a 4% margin), but more likely a Kennmore Elite or Maytag Neptune. A refrigertator with online access to temperature and enegry usage graphs is more likely to be a $3999 SubZero than a $399 GE. The good thing about this product is that as more people use it, pricing will drop and it will work its way down to mid-range products where the margins are thinner.

      And more to the point - it allows you to sell $399 fridge without an energy usage graph, or the exact same fridge, but with a CD-ROM and an Ethernet jack, so that you can view the energy graph from your PC, for $699, you've just made $300 on $33 worth of parts. That's a great way for fridgemakers to boost margins too :)

    3. Re:Good point. by Rob+Parkhill · · Score: 1

      $1!? I need them to be in the range of $.05 each before I can finally realize my dream of having a seperate IP address for every light fixture in my house.

      I doubt that this baby supports IPv6, though. Maybe by the time they are $.05 each it will...

      --
      "Tomorrow's forecast: a few sprinkles of genius with a chance of doom!" - Stewie Griffin
  67. Corrections by operagost · · Score: 2, Informative

    - The serial interface maxes out at 230 Kbps, not 300. In that way it would appear to be comparable to a 16650 class UART. But ...
    - Who cares? For an industrial control application, a device requiring more than 230 Kbps to sample data is rare. As fot the ethernet, it's 10/100 autosensing. I would expect the 80186 CPU to be the bottleneck before the I/O.

    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  68. Enough with the "net-enable your toaster" talk... by gregorio · · Score: 1

    Someone else said "I think the idea is that people who produce things like TVs, Refrigerators, water heaters etc... could easily intergrate these things into their products for a minimal cost."

    Well, no. All big development firms can afford to design their own ethernet interfaces (with $5USD realtek ICs), as this product also needs a microcontroller/processor to send the data (it doesn't control anything, it is just a physical interface translator).

    This device is made for hobbysts developing microcontroller projects.

  69. Along these lines... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You could put these things in drink kiosks so that they can email you when they're almost out of Dr. Pepper.

    I've seen a similar thing, but with an embedded alphanumeric pager. It would send email when the machine needed to be refilled (or maybe in other circumstances). Seemed much better to me - no wires.

  70. Mmmm.... nice. by Doctor+Hu · · Score: 1
    From the product spec sheet: 256K RAM 512K Flash, 10/100 Ethernet, Web Server (including Java applets, ferchrisake!), email sender, TCP/IP plus Telnet, SNMP, and the usual low-level service protocols. And AES Rijndael encryption as an option. Hot damn!

    Pity about the white/ grey packaging, though.

  71. Imagine... by wirefarm · · Score: 1

    Dropping a bunch of bogus DHCP servers onto the end of any available cables and tucking them under desks.

    Not that I'd ever *do* that.
    Heh heh...

    Cheers,
    Jim

    --
    -- My Weblog.
  72. -1 Misinformed: $100 to use that $30 module by KalvinB · · Score: 4, Insightful

    According to the site it's $100 for the SDK KIT which makes that $30 module useful. The xPort is an all in one solution for $50.

    $130 vs $50. SitePlayer is far more expensive and far less attractive as far as the packaging.

    Ben

    1. Re:-1 Misinformed: $100 to use that $30 module by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      how you got +5 insightful I have Zero idea.

      It takes 5 wires and a simple rj45 connector with the magnetics in it ($25.00 for 5 of them fro mthe site if you want) to make it work.

      If you aren't smart enough to understand basic electronics and wire up 5 wires + power then I guess you would need to pay the big dollars.

      But most people will easily get by with the $29.00 + a rj45+magnetics off of a cheap ethernet card.

      Siteplayer is still far cheaper for anyone that has the basic skills to use the thing to begin with.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    2. Re:-1 Misinformed: $100 to use that $30 module by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      You seem to be the one who is misinformed.

      1. The Siteplayer SDK includes a module.
      2. Does the xPort include a hardware SDK?
      3. The price for Siteplayer in quantity is $20.
      4. You only need zero or 1 SDK's, either case.
      You don't need one per module.

      Main difference between Siteplayer and xPort is that xPort includes the RJ connector + magnetics.

      Siteplayer has more general-purpose IO pins, but its serial port tops out at 115K (xPort is 230K).

  73. Re:Scam by ShortSpecialBus · · Score: 1

    Jellomizer's post is an "ovious lie" ;-)
    In that case, would you have to give it a hystorectomy?? (sorry, i cant spell and am too lazy to dictionary.com)

    --
    //FIXME: Bad .sig
  74. Yes - Factory control systems by AtomicSnarl · · Score: 2, Interesting

    These devices would be great for simplifying factory control systems. Consider a small refinery producing cooking oil, speciality lubricants, detergents, or other liquids. There are hundreds, if not thousands of valves, flow meters, temperature and pressure sensors, tank gauges, heating/cooling units, and so on. Aside from power, all these devices have at least a wire pair back to some central control position, often through some proprietary interface (sometimes several layers worth), usually a legacy from several factory refits back.

    These devices would let you strip away all the legacy hardware to be replaced by a simple RS-232 interface to the RJ45 device, then CAT-5 and local network back to a software solution control system.

    The upside: software replacement for hardware system, and generic interfaces throughout the factory!

    --
    Pacifist paratroopers yell, "Ghandi!" when they jump.
    1. Re:Yes - Factory control systems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Hmm.. Reactor 3 is making too much polymer, can we cut back the input feeds a bit?"

      "Sure thing. Hold on." *click click*Image pops onto screen

      "Wait---what is that?"

      "It's porn, sir."

      "What?! Why is it here, on the control network?"

      "The temperature gauge on Reactor 1 is sending it to input valve #73 on Reactor 4."

      "Well, why?"

      *click click* "They're cybering, sir."

  75. Too Expensive by Maxarlatan · · Score: 1

    We are in the manufacturing business out here in China. Just as a benchmark: Toasters US$5.00 DVD Players are now available for US$50 (not progressive scan but with dual decoders, DTS, 5.1 etc) Coffee Makers US$9.00 (for programmable, electronic) There is simply now way to justify US$33. That doesnt mean 'an extra $33 to web enable your xxxx, but more along the lines of $100, at thats at Walmart margins. A non starter. Bluetooth modules come cheaper & hence will be the first stop, with a web enabled controller of some kind a la Band & Olufsen.

  76. DDoS / spam opportunity of a lifetime. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    - System software upgrades via the Internet
    - performance notification via e-mail alerts


    Oh, joy. A DDoS robot and spam exploder on every appliance.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  77. They are available in quantities below 10,000 by cvanhorn · · Score: 4, Informative

    According to their website here: http://www.lantronix.com/news/pr/2003/02-24-xport. html they are available in single unit quantities for $49.00.

  78. Non cynical post by kinnell · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Typical - someone fits an entire web server into the space of an RJ45 socket, including socket space, and the top ten posts go on about what a waste of time it is! Personally, I think its great, and although I wouldn't expect toasters with this thing any time soon, it would be ideal for wiring factory equipment and such like with remote diagnostics (I get the impression this is the market they are aiming for). I think it would be massively improved if they could fit a wifi interface into the space wasted by the RJ45 socket, though. Then it might have realistic household applications.

    Their development methodology is out to lunch though!

    --
    If I seem short sighted, it is because I stand on the shoulders of midgets
  79. Re:I know I'm gonna get flamed for this... by Koatdus · · Score: 1
    ...but I *really* don't think I'll need a net enabled fridge. It's not that hard to go downstairs and check what I need. Or even check when I get home. Or even ring my girlfriend and ask her.

    Being the System Administrator at work, and being responsible for machines all over the building, I really appreciate that fact that most newer printers and fax machines have a built in web server that allows me to quickly look at the status of the machine when someone calls to say they can't print.

    A quick look will tell me right away if the machine has paper or if there is an error on the touch screen. Then I know if I should start there or farther up stream. (ie. print servers/queues). This ends up saving me a lot of time and the users think I am great because I can talk them through simple things. (most users like to feel like they were part of the solution)

    Trying to do the same by having the user read off the error messages to me can take three times as long.

    I can see a time in the future when I call GE to complain that my new refrigerator has a problem and the tech tells me to go to my PC put in my fidges URL, click on the download error log button and email it to him.

    After looking at the log he would then talk me through changing a couple of settings to account for humidity, how often it needs to defrost, etc.
    --
    Every wrong attempt discarded is a step forward - T. Edison
  80. ...to actually be useful by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    Forget the spy device - the only way I'm ever going to have that mythical web-enabled toaster is if they add a wireless interface to it.

    Let's just be sure everyone understands: I'm not pulling CAT-5 to my toaster.

    Once more, to make sure we're all in agreement: wireless.

    Thank you.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  81. PLC's was[Re:I'm wondering] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    As far as embedded systems goes, this is an order of magnitude or so too expensive.

    Many PLC systems are starting to come with embedded web servers in them to manipulate and control them. We recently did a project with a DMS controller that would have been easier with this kind of connection and interface. Alot of ITS and Systems equipment is expensive enough that $33 isnt going to hurt the price.

    omico--

  82. Net enabled... by essdodson · · Score: 1

    What are you net enabling? The network? Wait, shouldn't a network already be "net enabled"?

    Okay, back to reading this week's spam article, can't go a week without one of those, eh?

    --
    scott
    1. Re:Net enabled... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      No, you don't get it.

      "The network is the connector."

  83. fishy by twitter · · Score: 1
    Netmedia?
    Siteplayer Development Kit (SDK), $100?
    VB controls?

    It looks awfully M$ and not very honest. It's not a $30 does everything toy, it's a $100 develpment kit that might require a $250 OS and periodic "upgrades". Then again, maybe not. They might provide full documentation and standard interfaces. It's nice of them to sell singles but the M$ leanings hurt their credibility.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:fishy by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      read past the front page and you see that the magnetics + 5 thin copper wires to connect it from A to B + 5 volts power are all that is needed to work.

      Vb controls? yup. for the VB weenies, otherwise it's easy to control via a PIC or with linux (as linux HAS the tools built in already while Windows requires special VB tools to communicate with it for setup.

      Besides, java is the best use for any embedded commandsets if you want to extend it that way.

      I needed none of that for the projects I used them for.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  84. Art & Logic software based product by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Personally I'd rather use the Art & Logic software-based web server. Check this out:

    embedded software development with the Device Management Framework
  85. free embedded webserver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    The GoAhead WebServer is a free, embedded webserver which runs in about 200KB. It supports ASP, SSL, and a bunch of other things.

  86. this can't be for real. by twitter · · Score: 1
    I want to net-enable my car. Someone tell me how this RJ45 device will allow that. My car doesn't even have an RJ45 port...

    When you connect this to your car's serial output it will have an RJ45 plug. If you hook that plug to your home network, you could talk to your car. Of course, the car manufacturer would have to do all this because they generally won't tell anyone how to talk to their onboard computers.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  87. Mass deployment & address allocation by hubertf · · Score: 1

    So does it do IPv6?
    Or are they going to kludge some VPN "solution" into the stack, to make this thing work in a large scale environment?

    - Hubert

    1. Re:Mass deployment & address allocation by funbobby · · Score: 1

      I believe their target market is things like factory automation, where you have a lot of machines that only talk serial, and you'd like to run them all from one remote terminal using ethernet. These are situations where you only need to see them on the local network. Opening your factory equipment to the world would be a very bad idea anyway, so having enough IP addresses is not an issue.

    2. Re:Mass deployment & address allocation by hubertf · · Score: 1

      You wish.

      Why do you think VPN "solution" providers make big money these days? Because they work exactly around that thinking and the broken network design resulting from it. With some real (non-private) address space you'd just open up the firewall to whomever you want to get access to your systems and be done with it. With private address space, you have to jump through all sort of hoops to allow your business partners access your systems.

      - Hubert

  88. Isn't this like...dinosaur poop? by adbudha+kusu · · Score: 1

    El cheapo web-cams have been around forever. So someone got the brainwave to sell them in bulk minus lens and optics? Okay, that's caustic. But what the heck...how dated is this...

  89. Are any of you worried.. by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

    ... about the potential for one of these things to be hidden on your network and collecting/trasmitting data? Am I being paranoid or is that a potential privacy problem?

  90. Echelon? by yerricde · · Score: 1

    [echelon.com] where the technology is already imbedded in millions of consumer devices

    Why? So the government can spy on everything we transmit over the Internet?

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  91. coffee: by jdunlevy · · Score: 1

    Now if we can just get an implementation of the Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol (HTCPCP/1.0)...

  92. Why a Web Server? by dbs6183 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    While a web server is cool, and ideal for human interaction, it seems to me that the most promising application for this technology is on the assembly line. In this application, a passive technology (a daemon waiting for someone to connect) is not ideal.

    Why not implement an snmp daemon, this way the device can through traps you tell you when the "capper" is jammed, or when the fridges temp goes below a threshold. SNMP Mibs can allow for the same passive access that HTTP allows, though there would need to be a client involved.

    FizzyD

  93. Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've read this sheet 4 times now, I smell utter bullshit !! Somebody find me some real data and prove me wrong, this spec doesnt fit in this size container.

  94. I can see these being used in cars for diagnostics by Newer+Guy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I can see these being used in cars for diagnostics, as opposed to the propritary interfaces now used. One of these and a wifi would allow car service places to check out your car without you having to actually come into the dealership. Just start up the car and let us have a look at all its parameters over the web. The car could even tell them when something's going wrong or when routine service is coming due. They could also be used this way as/in a form of imbedded theft control device for the vehicle.

  95. free embedded web server by JimCricket · · Score: 1

    Art & Logic has a free embedded web server. Also check out GoAhead WebServer.

  96. It's not just a Web Server! Please remember that! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ever since I became interested in UNIX-type environments, I have been blown away by the functionality of its network management tools. And the best tools are also the most mature: SNMP and syslog.

    MRTG can graph the temperature of your house, and Your Favorite NetManagementSuite can page your vending-machine guy when you're almost out of Mountain Dew :-)

    These devices are for embedding in systems that already have an RS232 port for diagnostics. (Out-of-band router management, remote vending-machine support, and easy-to-read car diagnostic reports are some simple ideas.) Not for webcams, and most definitely not for getting older PCs to run as Web browsers. They *will* help you design new electronics that just plug in and work - no "special" serial cables (UPSes?) or messing with serial ("2400,7,E,1") settings.

    When you decide to make your equipment IP-accessible, please give us the choice of hitting its Web page, querying it with SNMP, getting SNMP traps, or getting syslog alerts. This will help automation, which is the reason we need connectivity in the first place.

    (Also, the .pdf file that is linked as a "review" is just an elaborated advertisement. The reviewer doesn't give her opinion on the part, or any of her experiences in implementing it! Anybody actually have *a review* of this part?)

  97. examples of how this might be used by JimCricket · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Small web servers are old news. Art & Logic has been creating embedded web applications since 1996. Typically, embedded web servers are used for something called web-based device management. Companies do this as an alternative to CLI or Windows/Java applications. All the usual advantages to web-based management apply, including ease of development, deployment, support, etc.

    This story has a lot of cool factor, but other companies (Ubicom, for example) sell web-enabled chips for less money (last time I checked). If you're talking about consumer devices (such as a toaster, fridge, etc), it's all about cost per unit.

    If you're building a more expensive product, you might have room for an RTOS (real-time operating system) and a software-based webserver to run on top of it, such as the GoAhead WebServer or the Device Management Framework.

  98. These will also be huge in medical equipment.. by Newer+Guy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    These will be huge in medical equipment if they're proven reliable. Imagine being able to monitor patients at home 24/7 over the web, or using these in hospitals for real time monitor and capture of medical monitors'data (EKG's etc.) over the Hospital LAN. Doctors could even use these to check up on patients from home without having to bother the nurses on duty. And in terms of having one in your refrigerator, though you might not need/want one there, a supermarket chain or restaurant might! Why do you think that so many are stafffed 24 hours? To keep an eye on the refrigeration equipment. I can also see these being used in process control devices, automation, and remote control units.

  99. For those of us who want to run at a snails pace by dacarr · · Score: 1

    Imagine a beowulf cluster of these things!

    --
    This sig no verb.
  100. Reasonable Limits Aren't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would you need IPv6?

    What, you can't envision a day when you have more net-enabled devices in your home than can be handled by IPv4?

    I don't want to have each room require its own NAT just because someone felt they had to come up with a net-enabled version of the USB toothbrush.

    1. Re:Reasonable Limits Aren't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh come on, I'm suggesting that one could have in excess of 4.3 billion net-enabled devices in a single home, and no one finds that funny?

  101. too small? by linux2000 · · Score: 1
    the XPort by Lantronix, a product that packs an entire web server into the volume of an RJ45 connector!

    Once you plug it into your switch, though, it's hard to get out unless you have really long fingernails.

  102. Re:Cool, this would solve the web server on the pl by LinuxHam · · Score: 1

    Actually, couldn't they just have a webserver on board, and cache several sites

    Continental Airlines does this today with the help of Verizon. Verizon pushes content a la BackWeb to the airplane via satellite. You with your laptop will jack into the armrest phone and attempt to dial *any* phone number. The on-board server captures your phone call and keeps you in the on-board server. They say you can do AIM and pop3, but no web surfing or SMTP yet. Web content is updated every 15 minutes. (Can you pipe a proxy server over AIM if you own the far end? Slow, I know, but hey.)

    I just flew from Glasgow to Newark, NJ in business class and had a LONG time to read the card advertising the service. $5.99USD covers the cost for the entire flight.

    --
    Intelligent Life on Earth
  103. Ah, perfect. by rabidcow · · Score: 1

    Like I said...

    Ask and it shall be given to you :)

  104. Operating system by yppiz · · Score: 1
    They say it runs "a tested, mature OS."

    So it's not Windows.

    Ba-da-bing. Thank you, you're a great audience. I'll be here all week.

    --Pat / zippy@cs.brandeis.edu

  105. Firewall by kyoko21 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If they can slap a webserver into such a small device, why not just slap ircop or some other small footprint firewall and hook it up with a pass through on the back end so you can hook another system behind it. Then, you can just slap that baby in and now each time you plug in your computer into the network, just slap that baby in the front of your RJ45 and whala, instant firewall for you and just do NAT for you. Now that would be really sweet.

  106. Another bit of kit by tengwar · · Score: 1

    I rather like these: a SIM-sized micro-controller running Java (hence capable of acting as a Web server). There is an ethernet pinout, but the easiest way to play with them^W^W^Wprototype is to put them on a daughterboard. You can telnet into them and download code by FTP. The bare microcontroller costs £40 ($50) for the 512kb version.

  107. A web server is not enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok cool every device (fridge, toaster, stove, tv) have a web server and a page to control the different aspects of the device... but is it how this will be really implemented...

    We will need even more processing to deal with the presentation and even if the device is presented with a web service interface (SOAP, XML WSDL...) a xml parser will still be needed on the device to handle the information: quite cumbersome.

    May the solution is to delegate these operations to a intermediary platform that will have a representation of the device and then have the device only deal with shipping unprocessed data to this platform.

    May be it is time to move away from the classic client-server architecture for devices and move more to a mutli tiered architecture with broker type platform between the applciation and the devices.....

    Companies like EmbraceNetworks Embrace Networks deal with this type of problem.

  108. Real World by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

    If someone can smuggle themselves into your building, install a piece of hardware onto your network, and smuggle themselves out, then back in and out again to remove the device, why not just install a keylogger onto the back of someone's keyboard and get admin priviledges?

    Well, in the real world, you never have complete control over a large facility. There are janitors, building engineers, contractors, etc. which all have physical access to sensitive areas. If you have enough tools at your disposal, all of which are difficult to detect, it is trivial to attack network security.

    Generally speaking, though, I would be more worried about someone with an iPAQ than this "jack". Combining the two though could be interesting...

  109. If they can do this then why... by cryptogryphon · · Score: 1

    http server $33
    webcam $25
    802.11 adaptor $64

    and yet a wireless network camera is $329! Yes I am oversimplifying, but you get my point - What is going on?

  110. Embedded Linux by flowerp · · Score: 1

    So who will port embedded Linux to that thingy? ;)

    Also think about the possibilities of such a device.
    Plug it into a corporate network as a "bug". Record
    data and have it send the data to an external site.

    It's the ultimate spy gear.

    --
    --- Eat my sig.
  111. If you are serious about 'net enabled' toasters... by rthille · · Score: 1

    Then you want the devices to send IP packets over their power plugs, and have a single device that sits on the 'power network' that has an RJ-45 and gateways packets between the 'power network' and ethernet. Like I really want an RJ-45 cable running from my blender to the wall, along with the power cable. It might be ok with things like the fridge or the washing machine, but an extra cable for things like a toaster, blender, or lamp would just kill the idea.

    --
    Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
  112. The terrorists ^H^H lawyers have already won! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    OOooooohhhhh! Don't forget STONES!

    Why some terroristic person could smash you in the head with a rock!
    Or your nephew could squish frogs with it! And everyone knows rocks are gateway tool ^H^H^H weapons. Why, next thing you now, he'll be a dirty, murdering despot like Saddam Hussein or George Bush!

  113. useless? hell no! by grimani · · Score: 1

    just wait til they replace the webserver with a packet sniffer instead...

  114. ethernet sensor? I do it all serial NOW, cheaper! by MrChuck · · Score: 2, Informative
    I'm reading these and it's like this is the first device that could make temperature reading possible.

    Sorry, it's just not.

    At $30/pop, yes, handy for things that cost $600+ that might want ethernet (it's still 5%, so up that even more until it's 2-3%).

    It's a serial-> ethernet device. For $30/port, serial is cheaper.

    Want to monitor a fridge? There are a billion devices that can read temp over serial devices.

    Wanna do a hole house? Scatter around some microcontrollers.
    PIC and many others make chips that have serial, talk a little programming and have things like digital IO or 12 A/Ds.

    Put one in each room - they fit in an outlet box with room to spare.
    Wire up sensors:

    • one reads light levels (along with time of day and other sensors, central computing can decide that the light is on, or it's just sunny).
    • some for TEMP (LM34/LM35's are the expensive option, but easy) -- one in the fridge, one at waist level for the room, one outside
    • humidity
    Digital IO can:
    • tell you if outlets are on with decent circuit work
    • tell if an (internal, see below) door is open or changes state
    • tell you if someone steps on the carpet (in the bathroom at 7AM so it knows to turn the coffee on).
    • control smart sockets (X10 is barely smart).
    • read a simple button push, unlock an internal door (below), can read the chip in your neck to see that you are now in the room (you know about the chip, right :), whatever.
    (It's a bad plan for burlar alarm functions, you want those run separately)

    The Controller is "taught" what type of sensor is on each input, it reads the values, actions may have it talk (96kb is more than fast enough) down a CAT3 or 5 to the central computer. This wire may also power it.

    Perhaps a temp threshold (high/low/change rate) triggers a report.
    Perhaps it just reports every N seconds (N=120 is still lots of useless data)
    Perhaps it also has OUTPUT. But it has little intelligence.

    Central computing can also "read" the burglar alarm and know that you just entered (it was your code), it's dark out and cold, it's dinner time, so it can turn on a couple lights, spit a message to your (serial) LCD in the hall with messages (your girlf is leaving you cause you leave the seat up and work on your computer too much and why the hell can't she turn on the damn lights like a normal person!).

    Central computer gets ethernet. Runs with no disk (flash boot), doesn't do much else. It can talk to a Real Computer that has the MP3s, etc.
    Central computer might just be a general MicroController, but it's taking 20 different serial connections in (232? or I2O or shared RS232 with a protocol (Device A: Read Sensor B @ value 116 becomes ASCII "AB00000116". or something). ASCII makes life easier, packets longer).

    For $30, I can get the PIC chip ($55 with basic to program it) and run 4 conducter alarm wire along a room (push it into drywall, spackle).

    For $30 at Q10,000, I want bluetooth or 802.11{a,b,g,i} and IPv6 and IPSec.

    Want all the serials to be ethernet instead and go into a 16 port hub? HUB: $100, 6x$30 for these: adds $280 plus development (at 10k rates).

    For the CAT5, I might as well stick with the serial. Let one machine agreggate the data and offer it over the network.

  115. interface with refrigerator, tv, etc. by cronian · · Score: 1

    How exactly does this device interface with some appliance. I understand that it is a small webserver, but how does it interface with an appliance?

    1. Re:interface with refrigerator, tv, etc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Via serial communication (RXD/TXD) with a microcontroler or co-processor.

      There are other embedded ethernet controlers that also have IO pins in addition to this, for simple logic input and output (ie: IO3=1 means the door switch is closed).

  116. I can!!! by blenderfish · · Score: 1

    TOASTER: Howdy doodly do! How's it going? I'm Talkie -- Talkie Toaster, your chirpy breakfast companion. Talkie's the name, toasting's the game. Anyone like any toast?

    LISTER: Look, I don't want any toast, and he (indicating KRYTEN) doesn't want any toast. In fact, no one around here wants any toast. Not now, not ever. NO TOAST.

    TOASTER: How 'bout a muffin?

    LISTER: OR muffins! OR muffins! We don't LIKE muffins 'round here! We want no muffins, no toast, no teacakes, no buns, baps, baguettes or bagels, no croissants, no crumpets, no pancakes, no potato cakes and no hot-cross buns! And DEFINITELY. NO. SMEGGIN'. FLAPJACKS!

    TOASTER: Aah, so you're a waffle man!

    LISTER: (to KRYTEN) See? You see what he's like? He winds me up, man. There's no reasoning with him.

    KRYTEN: If you'll allow me, Sir, as one mechanical to another. He'll understand me. (Addressing the TOASTER as one would address an errant child) Now. Now, you listen here. You will not offer ANY grilled bread products to ANY member of the crew. If you do, you will be on the receiving end of a very large polo mallet.

    TOASTER: Can I ask just one question?

    KRYTEN: Of course.

    TOASTER: Would anyone like any toast?

    KRYTEN: Didn't you HEAR what I just said?

    TOASTER: Yes, but I thought you might have changed your mind in the meantime.

    LISTER: You see? You see what he's like?

    KRYTEN: (Exasperated) We haven't changed our mind!

    LISTER: NO TOAST!

    TOASTER: But I am a toaster. It is my raison d'etre. I toast, therefore I am. If you don't want any toast, why did you repair me?

    LISTER: Yeah, why did you repair him?

    KRYTEN: He's a guinea pig for a technique called "Intelligence Compression." His AI chips were very badly damaged in the accident.

    TOASTER: But that was no accident! That was first-degree toastercide!

    LISTER: Just shut your grill!

    1. Re:I can!!! by Erik+Hollensbe · · Score: 1

      Please, please... Someone mod this up. :)

  117. Network Coffee Maker v2.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice, I already net enabled my coffee maker (no joke) with a SitePlayer module [siteplayer.com] but couldn't add all the features I wanted, like getting and setting the hotplate temperature, because I ran out of room... with this little guy I can do that and oh so much more! :)

    1. Re:Network Coffee Maker v2.0 by da2 · · Score: 1

      now a HOWTO on that would be interesting

  118. What of laws broken by OutKaster · · Score: 1

    HAAHAAHAHAHA that is so great!

  119. Worms come out when you shower? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Christ man, see a doctor! That can be fixed.

  120. Only 384 KB of storage? by jackbox · · Score: 1

    I'll never be able to run a decent pr0n site out of my toaster with that!

  121. this is sad by Hubert_Shrump · · Score: 1

    Man, let's get off the security tip and discuss some interesting applications of this.

    What draws geeks to virii, network security, etc - like a siren call?

    I'm thinking of putting one in my car - have it run my stereo. That'd be sweet.

    --
    Keep your packets off my GNU/Girlfriend!
  122. Can't wait until... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't wait until they make one in the form of an RJ-45 plug. Buy 16 of them, plug them into a switch, and you now have a cluster of servers!

  123. If it were wireless, at 5 bucks a pop, then... by atlacatl · · Score: 1

    Ethernet is great and all, but, there is that issue with the cables all over the place.

    Ok, you can hide them inside of the wall, but, what if you want to move your VCR (or whatever) where there is no network outlet).

    Once it's wireless, then we'd be talking about revolution (What about X10?)...

    --
    Esta es una firma en Espanol.
  124. DSTni: crappy overpriced microcontroller by zbik · · Score: 1

    I briefly lead the software development effort for this chip at Lantronix, the heart of their XPort product. It's just a 186 with a bunch of I/O modules grafted onto it. Problem is, there's no place for a 16-bit chip in the embedded market right now. The thing costs $20-$25 and barely outperforms a $5-$10 8-bit CPU, whereas you can buy a 32-bit RISC powerhouse like the AMD Alchemy for the same price. Lantronix just got stuck with a bunch of bad technology, and it's trying to unload it with an overpiced product.

    1. Re:DSTni: crappy overpriced microcontroller by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't Lantronix be upset that you were slamming their product. Let's hope you didn't sign anything that would open you up to litigation.

      The problem i have with the Alchemy is that it's unobtainable for hobbists, so I can't just grab one for any of my robotics stuff and have a network enabled robot with a kick ass processor.

    2. Re:DSTni: crappy overpriced microcontroller by zbik · · Score: 1

      Shameless plug: you can get an Alchemy Linux developer's kit from RedcellX. Don't know about the cost though.

  125. Sorry: fixit: Re:Forget about stealth Dreamcasts! by HiThere · · Score: 1

    I wonder how small a combination of this, a router, and a wireless node could be.

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  126. Bad joke by Ignorant+Aardvark · · Score: 1

    Dude, is that a Beowulf cluster of webservers in your pocket, or are you just happy to see me?

  127. Dead fly servers, birds, and automobiles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But you can't feed a RJ45-sized webserver to an unladened European swallow.

    Now speaking of dead fly servers, you can poor those into a bird feeder and the birds will carry your servers around and naturally follow around recently-washed cars and trucks to shit on them, and then you'll have your dead fly servers spread around the world by transient motorists and migratory birds MUA HAHAHAHA!

    -posting anonymous because my account "SlashdotTroll" has been lawfully postponed after two posts in 24 hours.

  128. Web-enabled kitchen sink by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IN SOVIET RUSSIA, the kitchen sink has everything including a web server.

  129. Just so you know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Lantronix R&D department is very small and overworked, and their marketing department is very slimy. They're a pump-and-dump style boarding-house of a company, and I can't _believe_ they actually weasled their way onto Slashdot. Before you give these people any kudos, take into account the fact that they only announced it -- they will _never_ actually deliver it.

    I used to work for this company, in their engineering department. During my internment there they "announced" products like this a dozen times, and NONE of them have come to market. I SAW THE MOCK-UP for this, on paper, about a year ago. I know the graphic artist "we" contracted to, to create the mock up. They were passing the printout around the marketing department, asking if there's anyone they could sell such a thing to, but they didn't have, and still don't have, a working prototype.

    "We" pulled this sort of thing in the past, too, with the 'DSTni' chip. A tiny surface-mount IC with a 486 PC's worth of computer in it, as well as ethernet and USB interfaces. Sounds ideal? IT DOESN'T EXIST. Not even the prototype. They passed out _empty_ICs_ at tradeshows, with the DSTni logo on them, to get people interested. Think I'm making this up? Try and find the chip, anywhere, in any product. Try and get the chip itself. You can't.

    What they DID come up with was the DSTni-LX, a larger, less powerful version of this product. How did they get that? They acquired it whole from a company they bought, three months prior, and re-branded the documentation.

    I left because I couldn't stomach working in a company that was, essentially, a house of con-artists. Recently I learned that two of their managers are under criminal investigation, and that their own stockholders sued them, charging criminal misconduct. The only reason you don't hear about this more often is they cut a deal with you when you leave: sign this NDA, and we'll give you a few extra grand. I told them to bite me.

  130. You're all stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone one of these posts was stupid.

    Slashdotters == Idiots.

    the only worthwhile thing was the original article. why do i even bother with you morons?

  131. Imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...a beuwoulf cluster of fridge webservers!!

  132. there's a solution ... by Pegasus · · Score: 1

    Here's how we do it:

    we use Cisco Catalysts all over the place and maintain a central VMPS database of which MAC addresses are allowed to get a network connection. See http://vmps.sourceforge.net/ for more info.

    So if someone plugs some networking device into a wall, it's gonna be as good as unplugged until someone inspects it and enters it into the vmps database. I think the additional work caused by this is well worth the additional security you get by implementing it.

  133. This'd be even more useful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...were it a HomePNA or HomePlug interface.

    Unfortunately, as I find myself continually whining, HomePNA is a bit strangled by Broadcom at the moment, and HomePlug will probably require a bulky-expensive transformer for quite a while, while suffering a few more security/privacy/stability issues.

    This is pretty cool, but only useful for your fridge if you do have an RJ45 jack next to it. You could do it with a WAP per-device- but then, you might as well make it integrated 802.11 from the start, and suffer its security issues.

    A product like SercoNet's PNA->Ethernet wallplate would certainly go a way toward solving the problem in existing construction, but they've never responded to my requests, and the 2001 date on their site suggests they might never have left the design phase?

  134. Re:I can see these being used in cars for diagnost by wayland · · Score: 1

    So wait, I'm driving down the road. I see a tollway coming up. I take a turn to avoid it, because I don't want to go there anyway. The car doesn't respond to the wheel. It continues down the hallway.

    Kaching!

    That's how to make money from wifi-enabled cars :)

  135. You guys are HILARIOUS!! by Fishead · · Score: 1

    You don't use this thing for serving any old webpage, it goes in a device to allow you to communicate with that device through the LAN.

    -It needs to be soldered into a device. Therefore, you would design the device to provide the required 3.3V on the appropriate pin.

    I wish they had put these in the PLC's at work. Just connect the CAT5 and it is networked.

    1. Re:You guys are HILARIOUS!! by WinstonG · · Score: 1

      It's actually quite interesting. I used a similar device to connect a JAVA based control system to a serial I/O board which in turn was connected to an industrial machine for underground operations several hundred miles away. Made for a neat Demo.

  136. Thanks A Lot! by snot+whistle · · Score: 1

    i just read this reply and i nearly choked on my chicken. that doesn't sound right - not 'nearly choked my chicken' but almost swallowed. my chicken, that is. as in DINNER. like nearly choked on my chicken. not like a girlfriend would, but different, like you might gag on pork. i laughed with a mouthful of food, that's what i'm saying. just forget it.

    --
    Where's Robin Hood? We could kinda really use him now.
  137. Arrggg by Swe3tDave · · Score: 1

    Just hoping i wont need to put a firewall to protect my breakfast. Well at least, i will be able to blame someone else...

    But for now i think my toaster is haunted..

  138. I'll give you a hint... by ilumin8d · · Score: 1

    in this context 'net-enabled' doesn't mean you can surf the net on it.

  139. You're closer than you think by ilumin8d · · Score: 1

    That's exactly the kind of application these things are intended for, while such a gizmo may be of no use to you, think about the possibilities for the poor mechanic who has to test and (if need be) service your car every time you take it back to the dealership. Consider the production line, where every car has to be thoroughly tested before it leaves to be sold. This is (comparitively) cheap method of getting all of that data out of your cars onboard computer and into a far more sophisticated computer that is able to analyse that data and present it to the engineer in a far more usable, or friendly, form.

    1. Re:You're closer than you think by Scooter · · Score: 1

      Thats a great idea - with a pre-configured wireless adapter on the web server, the car's diagnostics would be accesible the minute you drove into the dealership. If this was fitted in the factory, a franchised dealer would be able to see at a glance which cars were on the premises - and the data would be almost guranteed to be right, as no manual update of the database would be needed.

      Extropolating a bit further, goverments would want to track cars using these devices, which may give some an uneasy feeling - but then imaging systems are already scanning our license plates in real time. In the UK, the newer speed cameras (Truvelo, specs) can measure your speed, take a picture, and grab your license number. The first thing you know if you were caught speeding is the ticket lands on your doormat. Similar devices hadnle billing for chargeable zones in cities. So perhaps this won't be any more big-brother, it will just use a saner looking technology (imaging being a bit like screen scraping). Interesting possibilities packaged in a metal cylinder with some worms.

  140. Night Light by pixelcort · · Score: 1

    Far worse than a small webserver, check this out:

    Imagine a small night light that has an 802.11 card in it. Anyone that sees it would think of it as nothing more than a light. But inside is an entire circutry that enables it to get into wireless networks and try to get out to send feedback to it's master.

    On a lighter note, consider these as being used as network relay/extenders. Put one in each room of your house to increase the range and clarity of the network.

    As for ethernet ports, many are located near power outlets, and much of the time are under desks. Just go under someone's desk, plug in to the ethernet port and a power outlet and you'r done. I really don't think that anyone could notice.

    Why are we even talking about this, though?

    --
    http://pixelcort.com/
  141. would the pocket web be as interesting by wadiwood · · Score: 1

    as the videos they usually show?

    And I'd be really happy if they supplied free access when your plane gets delayed or cancelled. The last trip I tried to make cost me about 8 hours in delays and a missed meeting. VirginBlue was so much better before it tried to absorb Ansett.

    --

    -- it must be true, it's on the internet.
  142. The Ultimate Blog by cindik · · Score: 1

    Hook this into the artificial hippocampus mentioned in another /. article.

    Forget the video blog, you can invite the rest of the world into your brain! Shades of Herman's Head!

  143. Re:Forget about stealth Dreamcasts! ettercap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ettercap.sf.net

  144. Ex-employee says this is VAPORWARE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This entire conversation is fine and dandy, but I can tell you (as an ex-employee) that these jackassess will never get this thing off the ground. They haven't launched a successful product in years, and their last trade show appearance involved a dwarf in a super hero costume jumping out of an IT rack and screaming, "ConsoleWareMan to the rescue!" Absolutely pathetic. Maybe some other company will build the thing (Digi?), but not these losers. Take a look at some of the older Yahoo chat boards if you don't believe me: http://messages.yahoo.com/bbs?action=t&type=r&boar d=yahoo.90.04.1601028348