"I don't endorse it, but to be fair most laissez-faire economists still believe that market participants have to label goods and services accurately. "
So why is the US resisting inclusion of information on GM contents in food on the labels of food?
How do you measure it?
on
Working Hard?
·
· Score: 1
I have done consultancy in the States and in Europe. If you use the overall amount that Americans get done, then they are probably more productive than Europeans.
If however you measure it by how much time spent doing a particular task then Europeans score higher.
There doesn't seem to be the fear of going home before the boss in Europe that I have found in America.
The former British computer firm ICL (now, at best, a subsidiary of Fujitsu) invented a context sensitive file system called CAFS. This was hardware based and could search up to 1MB per second!
Have a look at the way the Norwegian justice system works before you make this kind of comment. The initial trial was in a lower court, both prosecution and defendants may appeal to a higher court.
You may not like it, but this is the way the Norwegian systems works, and has worked for a long time.
> Microsoft has already announced that, as part of the ECMA standards process, they are granting EVERYONE the right to implement the.Net Framework, WITHOUT paying any royalties whatsoever.
So how much of the whole.Net is the framework? Can I build web services with the framework alone?
Or will it turn out that I need the run time libraries which are not part of the ECMA standardisation, which are completely under the control of Redmond and are the likely place that implementation of these patents will occur.
> Personally, I think.NET is a better implemenation of the Java concept. I can use multiple langauges (VB.NET is much nicer for string handling crap, C# is better for syntax, Perl.NET for regexp) and it all works together whereas in Java, there is no reuse at all.
I am suprised this hasn't been moderated funny. Can you imagine a project which mixes half a dozen different languages? You happen to have one guy who is really keen on Haskell (assuming there is a binding for this) and writes a critical part of your suite in this. Of course he leaves immediately after the project finishes, leaving two VB people and a COBOL hacker. What happens when his chunk of code falls in a heap, or you want to upgrade it?
What I want to do is run an end to end application suite over whatever hardware is most appropriate. While.Net may give me elements of this, what happens when I want to use a library that MS has proprietary rights over and hasn't put to ECMA for standardisation?
Record companies currently produce and distribute the music as well as providing the PR for their artistes.
If someone produces software that allows artistes to run their own Web sites selling music online or to produce customised CDs for people then there would seem to be little requirement for their services except for publicity.
How many standards based pieces of software has MS tried to extinguish. In most cases because it didn't fit with their assumption that it might just undercut their monopoly.
"I don't endorse it, but to be fair most laissez-faire economists still believe that market participants have to label goods and services accurately. "
So why is the US resisting inclusion of information on GM contents in food on the labels of food?
I have done consultancy in the States and in Europe. If you use the overall amount that Americans get done, then they are probably more productive than Europeans.
If however you measure it by how much time spent doing a particular task then Europeans score higher.
There doesn't seem to be the fear of going home before the boss in Europe that I have found in America.
He talks a lot about usability, which is fine.
Here in the UK we are presently involved in implementing the Disability Discrimination Act, which is about Accessibility. How do you design for this?
Seven bits hey? They were obviously writing in ASCII and not a Unicode character set.
The former British computer firm ICL (now, at best, a subsidiary of Fujitsu) invented a context sensitive file system called CAFS. This was hardware based and could search up to 1MB per second!
Looks like another piece of MS innovation.
This article in the UK "Guardian" claims that the recent blitz of viruses was done by spammers trying to generate open relays.
A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds
Beloved of little statesmen, philosophers and divines.
Not any more they don't. They run Linux under VM.
However, you used to be able to get AIX for S/390. It was hugely expensive and didn't really catch on.
After all the EU won't let us have cucumbers with curves in them.
Or was it bananas, totally irrelevant anyway since it turned out to be another fabrication by the media.
> Yes, but the average Brit, in his heart of hearts, still doesn't really believe that.
Only because that nice Mr. Murdoch tells him so.
I realise I missed the smiley off the end.
:-)
Here it is
Especially if it comes from France
> Obviously this wouldn't apply to Russia, being a recent convert from communism.
Russian wasn't communist, and China isn't. Both are totalitarian governments in much the same way as Hitler's Germany or Pinochet's Chile.
Just because they said/say they are communist doesn't make it so.
Nice simile, well worth the score.
Absolutely on the button, one could equally well write
"...nations with the largest IT sectors had the lowest piracy rates."
Yet another confusion of correlation with causation.
Have a look at the way the Norwegian justice system works before you make this kind of comment. The initial trial was in a lower court, both prosecution and defendants may appeal to a higher court.
You may not like it, but this is the way the Norwegian systems works, and has worked for a long time.
Karl Popper has a hard nosed approach
If either of these don't apply then it isn't science.
You mean like libgdbm.so.2.0.0
:-) [And probably patentable]
That would be innovative
> Microsoft has already announced that, as part of the ECMA standards process, they are granting EVERYONE the right to implement the .Net Framework, WITHOUT paying any royalties whatsoever.
.Net is the framework? Can I build web services with the framework alone?
So how much of the whole
Or will it turn out that I need the run time libraries which are not part of the ECMA standardisation, which are completely under the control of Redmond and are the likely place that implementation of these patents will occur.
The British Parliament is effectively an extension of the US congress.
Or at least Tony Blair is GWB's poodle, or America's foreign secretary according to Jaque Chirac.
I always wondered why I always see .com, and almost never .com.us.
Essentially one character apart (yes, I know there is an E/I difference).
Windows/Lindows, exactly one character apart. Perhaps MS should have taken this case up in Germany.
> Personally, I think .NET is a better implemenation of the Java concept. I can use multiple langauges (VB.NET is much nicer for string handling crap, C# is better for syntax, Perl.NET for regexp) and it all works together whereas in Java, there is no reuse at all.
.Net may give me elements of this, what happens when I want to use a library that MS has proprietary rights over and hasn't put to ECMA for standardisation?
I am suprised this hasn't been moderated funny. Can you imagine a project which mixes half a dozen different languages? You happen to have one guy who is really keen on Haskell (assuming there is a binding for this) and writes a critical part of your suite in this. Of course he leaves immediately after the project finishes, leaving two VB people and a COBOL hacker. What happens when his chunk of code falls in a heap, or you want to upgrade it?
What I want to do is run an end to end application suite over whatever hardware is most appropriate. While
Record companies currently produce and distribute the music as well as providing the PR for their artistes.
If someone produces software that allows artistes to run their own Web sites selling music online or to produce customised CDs for people then there would seem to be little requirement for their services except for publicity.
When most phones these days have an address book built in.
In the longer term it would seem sensible to use a telephony equivalent to DNS, so consumers wouldn't have to use a number at all.
How many standards based pieces of software has MS tried to extinguish. In most cases because it didn't fit with their assumption that it might just undercut their monopoly.