Slashdot Mirror


Incas Used Binary?

Abhijeet Chavan writes "An article in the Independent reports that a leading scholar believes the Incas may have used a form of binary code 500 years before computers were invented. 'Gary Urton, professor of anthropology at Harvard University, has re-analysed the complicated knotted strings of the Inca - decorative objects called khipu - and found they contain a seven-bit binary code capable of conveying more than 1,500 separate units of information...If Professor Urton is right, it means the Inca not only invented a form of binary code more than 500 years before the invention of the computer, but they used it as part of the only three-dimensional written language.'"

477 comments

  1. Dont read it! by tjensor · · Score: 5, Funny

    Neal Stephenson was right! Its Snow Crash!

    --
    <fnord>OBEY</fnord>
    1. Re:Dont read it! by n3k5 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Neal Stephenson was right! Its Snow Crash!
      Haven't read the article yet, but I also thought of Stephenson's 'Snow Crash' when I read the posting. For those who haven't read the book, it describes an ancient culture that used clay tablets to write down algorithms that would be executed by humans. Much like cake recipies, but the ruler/priest would decide what needed to be done (harvest wheat, build a house, depending on the season) and make the subjects 'run' the right 'script'.

      And for those who'd like to understand the joke above ...
      --- SPOILER ALERT! SPOILER ALERT! ---
      Snow Crash, in the book of that name, is a virus that infects programmers if they just look at a certain document.
      --
      but what do i know, i'm just a model.
    2. Re:Dont read it! by more+fool+you · · Score: 5, Funny
      Snow Crash, in the book of that name, is a virus that infects programmers if they just look at a certain document.
      You mean like an NDA?
    3. Re:Dont read it! by SEWilco · · Score: 1

      Ever read of the killer in the SF classic "Macroscope"? Operates at astronomical distances. (That is not enough of a description to be a spoiler)

    4. Re:Dont read it! by ray-auch · · Score: 1

      nope - an NDA only infects if you sign it. this is more like Unix-source-according-to-SCO.

    5. Re:Dont read it! by Tenebrious1 · · Score: 1

      Knotted strings reminded me more of the primer's story in "Diamond Age", where entire programs were encoded into the links of a chain.

      Now all the archeologists need to do is find the machines that were used to decode these strings...

      --
      -- If god wanted me to have a sig, he'd have given me a sense of humor.
    6. Re:Dont read it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It sounds exactly like the chains in the "Diamond Age"

      If they find machines to decode the knotted strings... I would freak out... As would the rest of the world I guess...

    7. Re:Dont read it! by falsified · · Score: 1

      Why must EVERYTHING turn into SCO around here?!

      --
      HI, MY NAME IS ISAAC.
    8. Re:Dont read it! by Destoo · · Score: 1

      Sounds a lot like "Ring".

      See it. In seven days, you die.

      I've read all of the Ring books (ring, rasen, loop and ring 0) from Suzuki Koji and I want more. I'd recommend them to everyone. The movies are nice complement too.

      SPOIL

      (while we're in spoilers, and to stay on topic)
      and yes, there's a source code to that virus too..

      --
      Nouvelles de jeux et technologies en français. TC
    9. Re:Dont read it! by Em+Ellel · · Score: 1

      Why must EVERYTHING turn into SCO around here?!

      ...Because "EVERYTHING" is just obfuscated version of SCO's intelectual property. In some cases SEVERELY obfuscated.

      -Em

      --
      RelevantElephants: A Somatic WebComic...
    10. Re:Dont read it! by ManoMarks · · Score: 1

      Well, it beats everything turning into a discussion of Nazis. Speaking of which, isn't SCO a Nazi front organization? Oops, I did it! Damn!

      --

      That's gotta fit into your schema somewhere

    11. Re:Dont read it! by Trolling4Dollars · · Score: 1

      Mike Nelson: Thanks Crow. We try raising the level of discussion at least once on the show and as usual you bring it down again by play at being a bear. And what happens? You TURN INTO A BEAR! Good job. About as good as SCO is doing at convincing anyone that they have the goods on Linux. D'oh! See what you made me do!

    12. Re:Dont read it! by ManoMarks · · Score: 1

      Sorry, have to ask, who is Mike Nelson?

      --

      That's gotta fit into your schema somewhere

    13. Re:Dont read it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look up Mystery Science Theater 3000 in Google. Mike Nelson was the second host that show had. Joel Hodgson was the first. While I tend to prefer Mike, there are people who prefer Joel and say that Mike was essentially the anti-christ. Crow was one of the robots on the show:

      Crow T. Robot
      Tom Servo
      Gypsy
      Cambot

      Ahhh... TV died for me the day that show went off the air. There is nothing better than watching people do exactly what you used to do with friends while watching horrible movies that need to be derided.

    14. Re:Dont read it! by ManoMarks · · Score: 1

      Seems to me I still see it on SciFi, but it's probably re-runs. Thanks for the info. I though, oddly, that you were making a C.J. Cherryh reference with Crow... Huh

      --

      That's gotta fit into your schema somewhere

    15. Re:Dont read it! by UserGoogol · · Score: 1

      SCO is clearly a Microsoft front organization. [1] Well, same thing.

      [1] Of course it probably isn't. SCO as we know it used to be Caldera, which released a Linux distro, and... gee, I don't think Microsoft would do that.

      --
      "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity." -- Hanlon's Razor
    16. Re:Dont read it! by sidesh0w · · Score: 1

      Neat idea, but I think Stephenson actually had a Turing Machine in mind when he wrote that part of the primer's strory. The six (7?) castles contain models of computer logic of increasing complexity -- it's basically an intro to Computer Science class turned into a fantasy adventure game.

      Now, if the Inca had Turing machines, that would really be something. Writing entire computer programs using only binary coded knots would be an achievement on the scale of building the Pyramids with stone-age tools.

  2. Apaches used Hex? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Ever seen Hanna-Barberas Brave Starr? The bad dude's name was an indian named Tex-Mex of the Hexagon.. or something.

    1. Re:Apaches used Hex? by turgid · · Score: 1

      Wasn't that a Nazi cartoon? Didn't he come from "New Texas" and defend earth against the Bendars?

  3. 7 bits? by Gothmolly · · Score: 0, Informative

    Um, 7 bits gives you 128 values, not 1500. Or it wasn't binary. Or the position mattered. Or something.

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    1. Re:7 bits? by 91degrees · · Score: 4, Informative

      The colour mattered. 24 different colours.

      Seems highly speculative if you ask me. Maybe they just liked to add colours.

    2. Re:7 bits? by leviramsey · · Score: 1

      If the color mattered, wouldn't it be a 48-ary system?

    3. Re:7 bits? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting
      From the article:
      In a strict seven-bit code this would give 128 permutations (two to the power of seven) but Professor Urton said because there were 24 possible colours that could be used in khipu construction, the actual permutations are 1,536 (or two to the power of six, multiplied by 24).
    4. Re:7 bits? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course. If we have two bits, each having a total of 24 possible colours we would have (2*24)^7 combinations, which rougly equals the number of combinations for 39 ordinary bits.

    5. Re:7 bits? by Sikh+Soulja · · Score: 1

      Yes, the parent is correct. Reading the article: "In a strict seven-bit code this would give 128 permutations (two to the power of seven) but Professor Urton said because there were 24 possible colours that could be used in khipu construction, the actual permutations are 1,536 (or two to the power of six, multiplied by 24)."

    6. Re:7 bits? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still enough to store the more commmonly used ASCII characters though, so unless someone is seriously going to suggest they used Unicode, I don't think that it matters to much whether the number if 128 or 1500 - it is still enough to provide a "written" language... ;)

    7. Re:7 bits? by bj8rn · · Score: 1

      I wonder what they used the seventh bit for, in that case. End of line? positive/negative?

      --
      Hell is not other people; it is yourself. - Ludwig Wittgenstein
    8. Re:7 bits? by nniillss · · Score: 4, Funny

      Then it is not binary (but instead some 25-system if the possibilities are nothing or one of 24 colors). An archeologist trying to be a mathematician is apparently worse than vice versa.

    9. Re:7 bits? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in other news, researchers at a west Ohio bee farm have found evidence that leads them to conclude that ancient ancestors of today's popularly known "honey bee", " Apis Mellifera", developed the earth's first known apartment complex, the forerunners of todays "Hollywood Oaks", "Rolling Hills", and other such suburban sprawl residences. The researchers based their conclusions upon discovering that bees living over 150 million years ago lived in structures that today would be known as "hives".

    10. Re:7 bits? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...in other words, this is base 24, not binary?

    11. Re:7 bits? by myster0n · · Score: 5, Funny

      That seventh bit must have been for the evil bit. Those guys were way ahead of their time !

      --
      Nobody believes the official spokesman, but everybody trusts an unidentified source. -- Ron Nesen
    12. Re:7 bits? by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      Having read the article I bet myself that someone would query that almost immediatley. Quite a safe bet really.

    13. Re:7 bits? by arth1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Using 24 colors seems rather stupid to me. What if you're out of pigment #21? And what about when it's dark and you have to use artificial lights (read: torches) -- will you be able to tell that a dot is burgundy and not brown?

      Occam's razor dictates that the professor is wrong.

      Anyhow, archeologists a few thousand years from now will probably look at an old copy of WIRED and say the same thing about us.

      Regards,
      --
      *Art

    14. Re:7 bits? by nearlygod · · Score: 0

      The 7th is the evil bit.

      --
      The Tools Of Ignorance wanna be a tool?
    15. Re:7 bits? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If there are 24 possible values for each digit, it's not binary, but bidecaquaternary or something.

    16. Re:7 bits? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RTFA - it will help you to create some qualified comment.

      Seems like all those "You're new here, /. users don't read the articles" posts are written by newbies that do not feel the pain in the ass yet caused by those posters who write before reading/thinking.

      Would be nice if some people would consider

      1. Reading the article
      2. Thinking about the article
      3. THEN writing some comment about it.

      Life could be much nicer and less painfull that way. (Is this "insightful"? Obviously yes...)

    17. Re:7 bits? by ozbon · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Considering we're talking about a society/civilisation from 600 years ago (minimum) I don't think artificial light (other than fire) was really an issue.

      And if you're out of pigment #21, just make some more. (At a guess)

      --
      I say we take off and nuke it from orbit. It's the only way to be sure...
    18. Re:7 bits? by ozbon · · Score: 1

      Ah - one day I'll learn to read. You mentioned artificial light = torches.

      I'll shut up now.

      --
      I say we take off and nuke it from orbit. It's the only way to be sure...
    19. Re:7 bits? by pe1rxq · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you have a choice out of 24 colors this leads to 24^1 possibilitys which equals 24....... :)
      So you have a code space of 24 times 2^7 ....
      The article is a bit fuzzy on this point as it mentions 24 times 2^6 ... Maybe they left a knot out or only have 6 knots....
      In any way it is way less then your 39 bits....
      If it was 32 colors (2^5) this would lead to a total of 2^(5+7)=4096 (or in the articles case 2^(5+6)=2048)) possibilities. Or 12 (or 11) bits.

      Jeroen

      --
      Secure messaging: http://quickmsg.vreeken.net/
    20. Re:7 bits? by 91degrees · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Nope.

      Groups of 7 bits. All the knots in a group are the same colour.

    21. Re:7 bits? by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Binary for 7 digits and then base 24 for the 8th. I don't think you can describe it any simpler way.

    22. Re:7 bits? by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 1

      Then there's fading from sunlight to consider...

    23. Re:7 bits? by RevDobbs · · Score: 1
      The colour mattered. 24 different colours.

      So, they didn't use `1' and `0' then? 'Cause I was really hopeing to see some prior art so that this patent can be repealed.

    24. Re:7 bits? by /dev/niall · · Score: 1
      The colour mattered. 24 different colours.


      What I don't get is the colour. I mean, colours fade, right? What happens then?


      "Last month this Khipu detailed my crop rotation schedule. Now it's telling me I have to sacrifice 200 children the next time we coronate a king!"

      --
      --
    25. Re:7 bits? by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Troll?

      Did this moderator just not quite grasp the meaning of the word?

    26. Re:7 bits? by AndrewHowe · · Score: 1

      Well, William of Ockham wasn't born until 1285, so his razor didn't apply back then.

    27. Re:7 bits? by red_gnom · · Score: 1

      The 7th bit was for the parity check.

    28. Re:7 bits? by George+D.+Malone · · Score: 1

      I have noticed a few mentions of the 24 colors being the "numbering system: and not the "7-bits".

      The problem is that if the Incans used 24 colors for each bead (or 25, as someone suggested, using the lack of a bead as a color) then this would be a base-24 or base-25 system!

      If we take a base-2 number with a possible 7 digits, then we hve 2^7 possible numbers which is
      128 possibilites....but....If we take a base 25 number with a possible 7 digits, then we have 25^7 possible numbers which is 6,103,515,625 possibilities!!!

      Of course, this would be very similar to English...we have 26 letters and the possible combination of words with 7 letters is 26^7 or 8,031,810,176 possibilities (which is why it takes so long to brute-force crack a password).

      I don't know what this would mean for the Incans, but it makes the professor's job a little harder at cataloging all those messages the Incans sent back and forth to each other.

      Incan prediction: "The world will end when the worlds population reaches YYYYYYY"

      A is color 0, Y is color 24

    29. Re:7 bits? by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      I don't think it worked like that. Ah - here we go: "Professor Urton's study found there are, theoretically, seven points in the making of a khipu where the maker could make a simple choice between two possibilities, a seven-bit binary code. For instance, he or she could choose between weaving a string made of cotton or of wool, or they could weave in a "spin" or "ply" direction, or hang the pendant from the front of the primary string or from the back."

      I assume there are 3 other possible variation not mentioned there.

      So it looks like there's only one knot, but there are 64 ways of tying it. Then we have a seventh digit which is the colour. i.e. 24*2^6

    30. Re:7 bits? by ComaVN · · Score: 1

      I think it has something to do with your signature. Somehow, moderators don't like to be told how to moderate.

      --
      Be wary of any facts that confirm your opinion.
    31. Re:7 bits? by Hittite+Creosote · · Score: 1
      And what about when it's dark and you have to use artificial lights (read: torches) -- will you be able to tell that a dot is burgundy and not brown

      Can't see. Hold it closer. Closer. Ah yes. It's on fire.

    32. Re:7 bits? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Occam's razor dictates that the professor is wrong.

      No, Occam's Razor does not dictate anything.

    33. Re:7 bits? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
      Anyhow, archeologists a few thousand years from now will probably look at an old copy of WIRED and say the same thing about us.
      If an archaeologist is stupid enough to draw any conclusions from Wired, he's certainly stupid enough to draw stupid conclusions.
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    34. Re:7 bits? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
      Well, William of Ockham wasn't born until 1285, so his razor didn't apply back then.
      Which is a pity, it could have served as the 'delete' key.
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    35. Re:7 bits? by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Doh! Forgot about that.

    36. Re:7 bits? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
      unless someone is seriously going to suggest they used Unicode
      Groan. Not unifriggincode, please. Woo hoo! We can write elven tengwaric runes (or whatever). And all at the price of octupling the storage requirements.

      Anyone who can't speak English (or maybe German (the French can sod off)) shouldn't be allowed to touch a goddam computer in the first place.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    37. Re:7 bits? by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      The article makes it sound just like a binary tree. because you tie knots off it and and follow different "paths". Although I would not consider a binary tree to be 3 dimentional. .. I think it would be fun to learn a simplified version of this language, would make for really fun activities for children at camp or whatever. Can't wait till they understand how to dicipher it.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    38. Re:7 bits? by Em+Ellel · · Score: 1

      Well, there was an assumption from the person starting this thread, that a binary bit is either 1 or a 0 (or representation thereof, which is what "binary" means).

      Thus if there are 24 colors of bits, you have 48 possibilities for each so-called "bit", 24 0's and 24 1's. Making it a base48 system as was suggested.

      On the other hand,if there are no 1's and 0', just 24 colors, the "bit" has 24 possibilities, thus it is base24.

      The number of possibilities in 7 binary (base2) "bits" is 128. In base24 it is about 4.6 Billion, in base48 it is about 587 Billion

      So basically, the phrase "they contain a seven-bit binary code capable of conveying more than 1,500 separate units of information" is, at best, grossly inacurate. Which is what the initial complaint was.

      Of course this is purely academic, since the article states that is that it is actualy a mixed code, 6 binary bits + 1 Base24 bit (the color of the 6 bits, which are all same color) which is where the 1536 number comes from (64*24).

      The moral of the story, RTFA.

      -Em

      --
      RelevantElephants: A Somatic WebComic...
    39. Re:7 bits? by George+D.+Malone · · Score: 1

      Well....that's what I get for not reading the article... :)

  4. How advanced? by m00nun1t · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'd be *really* impressed if they had Duke Nukem 3.

    1. Re:How advanced? by Jellybob · · Score: 1

      They did.

      It's just that it was a game involving placing cards on top of each other in alternate colours, and in declining orders of the numbers on them.

      But it was Duke Nukem 3, because that makes them look more advanced, and will get coverage on /.

    2. Re:How advanced? by Dri · · Score: 1

      Ha! They may have produced vaporware before they even knew it! =P

      --
      Girls are strange. They don't come with a man page.
      -- Michael Mattsson
    3. Re:How advanced? by MrResistor · · Score: 1

      I don't know if you'd call it DN3, but they did actually have people kill each other for entertainment.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
  5. I guess by Daath · · Score: 5, Funny

    That means that the Incas were a bit advanced! :P

    --
    Any technology distinguishable from magic, is insufficiently advanced.
    1. Re:I guess by Linker3000 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Incnix? Incnux?

      --
      AT&ROFLMAO
    2. Re:I guess by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh - dont tell SCO ;)

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    3. Re:I guess by Linker3000 · · Score: 1

      Prior art!

      --
      AT&ROFLMAO
    4. Re:I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And they were obliterated by the invention of the "evil bit".

    5. Re:I guess by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      Isnt the current SCO CEO directly descended from a rich South American blood line?
      I'm sure their lawyers are attempting to prove this as we speak.......

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    6. Re:I guess by sharkey · · Score: 2, Funny
      Incnix? Incnux?

      Well, we know it wasn't Incdows. The Incas were MUCH more advanced.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    7. Re:I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Byte me.

    8. Re:I guess by notque · · Score: 3, Funny

      Incnix? Incnux?

      Don't you mean GNU/Incnix?

      --
      http://use.perl.org
    9. Re:I guess by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

      "Well, we know it wasn't Incdows. The Incas were MUCH more advanced."

      It had to be Windows. No other OS runs on a Tablet PC!

    10. Re:I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, GNU/Incux you silly, IncSCO owns the trademarks on Incix.

  6. Message ? by EpsCylonB · · Score: 3, Funny

    I reckon they were prolly trying to say one of three things (in order of likelyhood)...

    1) first post !

    2) All your base are belong to us

    3) imagine a beowulf cluster of these things

    1. Re:Message ? by peterpi · · Score: 2, Funny

      Perhaps they were placing bets on how long FreeBSD would take to die.

    2. Re:Message ? by syle · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually, the message has already been partially deciphered, but experts are unable to find a meaningful connection between the translated phrases, "hot grits," "natalie portman," and "petrified."

      --

      /syle

    3. Re:Message ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After deciphering the messages in the knots there was one rope which could not be understood by any scholars. They marked it as being ????, while the next and final rope translated roughly as "Profit!".

    4. Re:Message ? by orasio · · Score: 5, Funny

      3) imagine a beowulf cluster of these things

      We have those.
      We call them sweaters.

  7. If my alphabet.... by C0deJunkie · · Score: 0

    ...was made by 1's and 0's I could have been out of my elementary school in less than 5 years!

    The world is made up of just 10 kind of people: who understands binary code, and who does not.

    1. Re:If my alphabet.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, right.
      You wouldn't code because in a world like that, it would have been normal and cool to use binary.

      You would have spent those 5 years playing dodgeball or something like that and become an athlete.

      Marginal.

  8. Strings of cotton and wool by ralico · · Score: 5, Funny

    And if they washed and shrank them, would that have been data compression?

    --

    SCO to Hell
    1. Re:Strings of cotton and wool by tizzyD · · Score: 3, Funny

      Very funny. LOL? But then, if I crinkle the strings, would that be encryption? Or just plain obfuscation?

      --
      ...tizzyd
    2. Re:Strings of cotton and wool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, that would be line noise. Or in this case, string noise.

    3. Re:Strings of cotton and wool by follower_of_christ · · Score: 1
      Khipu can be made of cotton or wool, cross-weaved or spun into strings.

      They probably had the first inter net too....

    4. Re:Strings of cotton and wool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And does that mean string concatenation was a costly operation for them too?

    5. Re:Strings of cotton and wool by Ch_Omega · · Score: 1

      "Very funny. LOL?"

      You think it's funny, but are not quite sure if it's funny enough to laugh out loud for? :)

    6. Re:Strings of cotton and wool by toivotuo · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately that would be data loss, plain and simple. This is exactly what happened at the Laguna de los Condores (Peru) site in the mid-1990s. A bunch of Inka mummies and associated khipus were found by a group of day laborers. Before a local historian intervened the guys had hacked open several of the mummy bundles and the wife of fellow the guys were working for had washed at least one (supposedly) fabulous, multi-colored khipu with _detergent_. It still has the knots, but it is now pure white.

  9. Why are we so surprized? by tizzyD · · Score: 5, Insightful
    We tend to have such an ego about ourselves. We think that we are the only ones who've ever had running septic systems, who moved mountains, and now, it appears, to use binary. Think: how else to you code data on a string? Our ancestors are not all that stupid. They helped us get to where we are today.

    The more we learn, the more we forget. For example, who can tell me the best mix for bronze? Not many now. How about what's best to plant after sowing rye for two years? As we continue to move into a more technological society, there is quite a bit of knowledge we are losing. Remember the famous ancient battery?

    I'd suggest that if we got off of our superiority high horse, we'd find that we've always been quite ingenious. 7-bit though, that's what I find interesting. Wonder where 7 bits comes from. 10 or 5 --that I'd understand. 7, perhaps someone who'd been in a terrible accident?!

    --
    ...tizzyd
    1. Re:Why are we so surprized? by pubjames · · Score: 4, Informative

      I agree. I still don't think the recent discovery that mehtods to generate electricity were know about 2000 years ago receives enough recognition: More here

    2. Re:Why are we so surprized? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm afraid the Incas patented the binary system and their works are copyrighted. Their decendents work for what is now known as SCO.

    3. Re:Why are we so surprized? by Hittis · · Score: 2, Interesting

      10 or 5 would make sense only in a 10-base culture. Anybody now which base the Incans used?
      Perhaps they didn't have a '0' (like the romans) and started of with 1 meaning an empty hand wich could mean 11 as a base?

      Purely guesswork.

      --
      //Patrik Graeser
    4. Re:Why are we so surprized? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      7 is the number of things the average human can hold in short-term memory at one time.

    5. Re:Why are we so surprized? by bj8rn · · Score: 1
      What's interesting about the Incas, is that they never discovered the use of wheel. They used wheels in building toys, but they didn't have carts and wagons.

      The 7 bit thing. Maybe it was the most suitable system for them, worked out through trial and error. Or maybe it's just something to do with 2^0+2^1+2^2=7(=111 in binary)?

      --
      Hell is not other people; it is yourself. - Ludwig Wittgenstein
    6. Re:Why are we so surprized? by forinti · · Score: 1

      One interesting thought exercise is to think about which things one could teach or do if transported to the middle ages, given the resources available then. ItÂs not that easy!

    7. Re:Why are we so surprized? by eatdave13 · · Score: 1

      Great, I can't tell you how to best mix bronze. Could they tell me how to make stainless steel?

      --
      "Verbing weirds language." -- Calvin
    8. Re:Why are we so surprized? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i'd like to see how well you drive your cart in a place that is among the most mountainous regions on earth

    9. Re:Why are we so surprized? by bj8rn · · Score: 1

      By the way, they had very good highways there between the capital and some other cities. These roads were one of the things that helped the Spanish to conquer the Incas so easily.

      --
      Hell is not other people; it is yourself. - Ludwig Wittgenstein
    10. Re:Why are we so surprized? by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      It's also the maximum number of close friends you can have at any one time, more than seven and you start to miss people out and forget them.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    11. Re:Why are we so surprized? by dzerkel · · Score: 5, Funny

      Bill Gatezaqql sez, "No one will ever need to count more than 127 of anything..."

      --
      "What's the point of going abroad, if you're just another tourist..."
    12. Re:Why are we so surprized? by bobba22 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm not sure, but I think the Incas also had a 7 day week. As they were very into their astronomy and astrology, could this be the reason?

    13. Re:Why are we so surprized? by Kopretinka · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The more we learn, the more we forget. For example, who can tell me the best mix for bronze? Not many now. How about what's best to plant after sowing rye for two years? As we continue to move into a more technological society, there is quite a bit of knowledge we are losing. Remember the famous ancient battery?

      I don't think that 500 years ago, or a couple thousand years ago (in the bronze era) there were that many who would tell you the best mix for bronze.

      While it is true that some arts are lost (dead languages, for example), still there are enough people who know the best mix for bronze or what to plant after rye. The thing is we don't need one such person per neighbourhood anymore since we can store and communicate information very easily.

      In fact, even if we suddently stop using bronze and the current makers slowly die leaving no successors, we may still be able to recreate bronze because the best mix is recorded somewhere. That is, as long as we can read it - we are now surprised with the Incas' use of binary because their whole civilization is gone. If Incas lived, they could have been the origin of computers, once the technology was there.

      --
      Yesterday was the time to do it right. Are we having a REVOLUTION yet?
    14. Re:Why are we so surprized? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Could they tell me how to make stainless steel?


      Good question. Would it be possible to make steel without all the other knowledge preceding it? By the way, steel was invented in China long before Europe figured out what steel was. But then again, one day we'll probably discovered it was invented by some other group before the chinese.

    15. Re:Why are we so surprized? by geighaus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It is believed that 7 is a number of things human's brain can operate at any given time. Doubt that Incas were aware of this 'fact', but who knows after all :=

    16. Re:Why are we so surprized? by Cereal+Box · · Score: 0, Troll

      Hey, you know what? At least we have a written language. I'm not so impressed that the Incas used a complicated system of tying colored knots on string that *kinda* resembles binary when you consider how much easier it would've been to just write the information down.

    17. Re:Why are we so surprized? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Iranian batteries? Incan binary systems? I think it is obvious what has happened: rogue time travellers have begun polluting our timestream.

    18. Re:Why are we so surprized? by Bigby · · Score: 1

      For some reason, civilizations have been fascinated with the number 7. the 7 wonders, seven sages, seven days in a week (tied into God resting 1 day after 6 days of work), etc... (and there are a lot more)

      One explanation is that it is the oddest single digit number. It is the largest single digit prime and the other primes (2, 3, 5) are "just too simple" and small.

      Another explanation could be that the largest number represented by a 2 bit number is 3. The largest number represented by a 3 bit number is 7. But that is far fetched and stupid.

    19. Re:Why are we so surprized? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Even back then I am sure not everyone know how to mix bronze or all knew how to sow rye. Like today people has specialized jobs and they knew information that the rest of the public didn't. Still today they are people who know how to sow rye and mix bronze. But asking that on slashdot is silly because most of us are computer/technology science specialized.
      As for the 7 bits I think it could be because it is a prime number. Which could be important for doing things on ropes and knots. Because if one rope got broken you can realize it is bad because there would be a non-prime number remaining. Prime numbers are quite old. And have been used for ages.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    20. Re:Why are we so surprized? by skvngrx · · Score: 1

      Bronze: roughly 9 parts copper to 1 part tin - varying the ratio can lead to many color differences. You need a very hot furnace though...

      The more we learn, the more we forget, the more we rely on google.

    21. Re:Why are we so surprized? by Q+Who · · Score: 1

      Don't pay too much attention to these idiots... Classical case of Noble Savage complex.

    22. Re:Why are we so surprized? by bj8rn · · Score: 1
      How about what's best to plant after sowing rye for two years?

      If you're using the old three-field system, you grow rye on one plot, barley on the second one and let the third one lie fallow. So one answer would be, that you don't grow rye on the same field for two years in a row. If you don't want to let it lie fallow, then clover is a good choice, as it helps to restore some kind of minerals (or something, I don't remember that much about junior high biology) the rye has consumed. Potatoes are definately not a good choice.

      --
      Hell is not other people; it is yourself. - Ludwig Wittgenstein
    23. Re:Why are we so surprized? by CommieLib · · Score: 4, Insightful

      C.S. Lewis had a term for this: "snobbery of chronology". We, as a people, have a tendency to forget that people everywhere, always, are blindingly clever, and that the only reason we have, for example, cell phones, is that we have had a continuous line of development rather than one interrupted by plague, mass migration, etc. Take a little while and study archaeo-astronomy and this becomes clear.

      --
      If your bitterest enemies are people who hack the heads off civilians, then I would say you're doing something right.
    24. Re:Why are we so surprized? by Cereal+Box · · Score: 0, Troll

      Nobody is saying that the Incas didn't come up with some neat stuff... but to say that using a method of information storage that is not only hard to read but also to "write" (tying knots in string and painting them) is impressive when you consider that other civilizations of the time had WRITTEN LANGUAGES is laughable.

    25. Re:Why are we so surprized? by tsa · · Score: 1

      A week has 7 days. That's weird! I guess it has something to do with astronomy.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    26. Re:Why are we so surprized? by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > how much easier it would've been to just write the information down

      I agreed with you until I remembered that they didn't have pens & pencils. Sure, you can etch into clay or mud, but that isn't as easy to transport or keep in readable condition.

    27. Re:Why are we so surprized? by quantum+bit · · Score: 2, Funny

      In fact, even if we suddently stop using bronze and the current makers slowly die leaving no successors, we may still be able to recreate bronze because the best mix is recorded somewhere.

      Yeah, but it's probably covered under the latest copyright extensions, so the corporation that owns the bronze copyright (even though they're not producing any bonze themselves) will sue the pants off anybody who tries to make any.

    28. Re:Why are we so surprized? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      By the way, they had very good highways there between the capital and some other cities. These roads were one of the things that helped the Spanish to conquer the Incas so easily.

      It's a lot easier to build "highways" when all the travelers are of human width. Now trying to build roads on which two carts can pass... let's leave that for the Romans.

    29. Re:Why are we so surprized? by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

      If it is indeed 7 then maybe we need to look to the heavens for a possible suggestion. Many cultures used the stars and other celestial objects for basic measurement and time keeping. For example if a circle has 360 degrees, it is because it is based on the length of Earth's orbit, in days, around the sun. Going on from there 7 is both the length of a week and quarter the length of a lunar month. This is one explanation of why they used 7, but without having a better understanding of their culture it is hard to really understand their perspective and understand how they thought.

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    30. Re:Why are we so surprized? by friscolr · · Score: 1
      Wonder where 7 bits comes from. 10 or 5 --that I'd understand. 7, perhaps someone who'd been in a terrible accident?!

      Perhaps from their cosmology. Do a google search for chakana, the name of a main symbol adopted by the Incans. The results will explain a lot about their cosmology.

      7 may come from the 4 directions plus the 3 worlds.

    31. Re:Why are we so surprized? by smack_attack · · Score: 1

      They're only supposed to watch and record, but sometimes they get a little out of hand and next thing you know they're making the Jews follow a "pillar or fire" around in the desert for 40 years or some rookie fogets to charge the transport before leaving and gets stranded in Sumeria for a few years and has to recharge the damn thing somehow.

    32. Re:Why are we so surprized? by cybercuzco · · Score: 1
      For example, who can tell me the best mix for bronze?

      These Guys can. If anything, we know better now how to make bronze than they did 4000 years ago. Just because they could make it then doesnt mean that it was better than now. Its hard to make good bronze with a wood fire and goatskin bellows.

      --

    33. Re:Why are we so surprized? by BigBadBri · · Score: 2, Insightful
      What?

      You mean the Inca had a seven day week, from the same creation myth that we have?

      Wow, spooky.

      The nearest astronomical justification for a 7 day week would be 1/4 of a moon cycle, which may indeed be related to the true origins of the week, full moon - waning - new moon - waxing being natural divisions for a society basing its calendar on lunar observation.

      Perhaps the inventors of Genesis merely fitted the creation myth to a pre-existing division.

      --
      oh brave new world, that has such people in it!
    34. Re:Why are we so surprized? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, they used a binary system while we use 10 symbols. And the babylonians used 60. How's that "more ingenious", or "better"?

      If fact, you can represent the same number in much less digits if you write in base-10 than in base-2

      They weren't using (a form of) binary for the same reasons that we do. Sure, it's a interesting discovery about our ancestrors, but nothing more.

    35. Re:Why are we so surprized? by mysticgoat · · Score: 1

      7-bit though, that's what I find interesting. Wonder where 7 bits comes from. 10 or 5 --that I'd understand.

      Who's to say for sure? But what came to my mind is

      1. northward
      2. eastward
      3. southward
      4. westward
      5. earthward
      6. skyward
      7. inward

      These directions have been used throughout the Americas for a long, long time, sometimes as a way of communicating what a thing is.

      Apologies if this drink seems a little heavier than standard slashdot fare. I'm sure some readers may find it hard to grok for that reason.

      I know! I'll leaven the brew with some yeast of the Sacred Chao! I don't know the Incan words, but I know they had this concept.

      Now mind that you don't drink all this too fast. The fermentation of these ideas could blow the top of your skull off, but it is a kind of sneaker drunk. You might not realize you've lost your apparent cognitive control until it's too late. It would be a shame if you overheard your friends talking about you:

      "Poor guy. Yeah, he seeemed to be pretty together, and then he caught this weird incan/illuminatis mind-virus thing while reading a slashdot comment. It's a shame really."

      All is <fnord>, and that <fnord> is all.

    36. Re:Why are we so surprized? by cens0r · · Score: 1

      Actually it was the mayans and the aztecs who had the wheels on toys. However, they had no large animals to really make use of the carts. The Inca's had the large draft animals, but never made contact with the mexican cultures.

      --
      Jack Valenti and Orrin Hatch will be first up against the wall when the revolution comes.
    37. Re:Why are we so surprized? by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 4, Informative

      The article, unfortunately, is a little hyperbolic - Gary Urton has done some fine work, but they've taken what's essenntially a metaphor about any point of choice being a binary element and suggested something that's a bit misleading. I don't think there's any indication that color-function was standardized across quipu-makers: just like some elements of coding style are unique from programmer to programmer, I see nothing surprising about the fact that the choice of materials for different cord-groups would be a matter of personal taste and mnemonics for the quipu-maker (and materials are dyes used also seemed to rely heavily on the region that the quipu was produced.)

      The quipu were base-10. They did, in fact, use a "place holder" comparable to a zero, and the relationship between that place holder and the Quechua word for "zero" suggests that you could say there was a zero concept.

      The discovery of the base-10 nature of the quipus was done by noting how sets of hanging strings, interepreted as base-10 (lowest set of knots as 1-place, second set of knots as 10's-place, etc) would add up to the same number the number on a cord which hung at the top of those groups.

      Urton's Social Life of Numbers is a very good book about the quipu, but there are some concerns: he makes some historical claims based on ethnographic research (that's a bit a-historical).

      A more rigorous look at the mathematics of the quipu is Mathematics of the Incas. It's also a fun book, teaching one how to make one's own quipus.

    38. Re:Why are we so surprized? by cens0r · · Score: 1

      Developing a written language is one of the hardest things a culture will ever do. We only know of 3 places where writing arose independently (china, mesopatamia, and mexico), everyone else either adapted someone elses method or stole the idea.

      --
      Jack Valenti and Orrin Hatch will be first up against the wall when the revolution comes.
    39. Re:Why are we so surprized? by operagost · · Score: 1

      Clover returns nitrogen to the soil.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    40. Re:Why are we so surprized? by Cereal+Box · · Score: 0, Troll

      Sure, but it would've been easy to simply make colored dots on some sort of paper or leaf and this system would be much more portable and manageable.

    41. Re:Why are we so surprized? by operagost · · Score: 1

      Or perhaps it's an actual historical record. After all, the worldwide flood "myth" appears in most ancient cultures as well.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    42. Re:Why are we so surprized? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have we been reading Crichton's "Timeline" again?

    43. Re:Why are we so surprized? by onepoint · · Score: 1

      just a simple note, The Incas had runners that were about a mile apart from each other, and would relay messages, it took 5 days from the farthest points to the incan capital to send a message.

      messages traveled at about 8 miles per hour.

      --
      if you see me, smile and say hello.
    44. Re:Why are we so surprized? by mysticgoat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm not so impressed that the Incas used a complicated system of tying colored knots on string that *kinda* resembles binary when you consider how much easier it would've been to just write the information down.

      Hey, troll, I almost took your bait.

      Then I realized that most everyone reading slashdot is bright enough to recognize that a library of strings tied around your waist is a hell of lot easier to carry on mountain trails than the same amount of information packed into clay tablets or animal skins. Or even books (assuming that the local resources would provide a paper analog).

      More durable, and easier to store, too. Plus, binary encoded strings (to use the proper name for such a system) could be easily duplicated in quantity by illiterate children.

      So perhaps the mystery of how the Incan Empire came to be comes down to their having discovered a method of mass publication, and the use of child labor in their publishing houses.

      </tongue-in-cheek>

    45. Re:Why are we so surprized? by mysticgoat · · Score: 1

      I haven't checked the link yet, but on the basis of the "snobbery of chronology" definition, I would mod this "insightful" if I had points to use at the moment.

    46. Re:Why are we so surprized? by triumphDriver · · Score: 1

      That is not exactly a fair analogy.

      We know the stuff we need to know to live in our environment at our current sociological and technological level.
      We are becoming more specialized in our knowledge which is a function of the amount of knowledge out there.

      What percentage of our population can tell you how a semi conductor is produced? Probably pretty close to how many of our ancestors knew how to make Bronze.

      --
      I grew up in the Fulda Gap, where did you?
    47. Re:Why are we so surprized? by cens0r · · Score: 1

      You are using modern concepts. Think about the other writing systems that were around. Elaborte pictographs or cuniforms carved into clay tablets. How much more efficient are those than this system? To make paper you need specific kinds of natural resources, and I don't believe the Inca's really had them.

      --
      Jack Valenti and Orrin Hatch will be first up against the wall when the revolution comes.
    48. Re:Why are we so surprized? by Deagol · · Score: 1
      I believe you're thinking of nitrogen fixing. Nitrogen is heavily used by most grass-type crops (wheat, corn, oats, etc.). Legumes (beans, clover, and alfalfa) "fix" nitrogen back into the soil. I think it has to do with microbes which habitate the roots of these plants.

      Myself, I find the "three sisters" methods of the native americans fascinating. Thier fields consisted of mounds of dirt. on the perimeter of the mounts grew corn. They grew vining beans between the corn (which provided a stalk to grow upwards). Last, they grew squash (gourds, pumpkinds, etc.) between the mounds. The squash plants made good living "mulch" and kept ground moisture around longer (though I don't know if the natives actually knew that part). They also grew sunflowers on the perimeter of the fields, too.

      Go search for the free (public domain, I think) text of "Buffalo Bird Woman" -- an interesting perspective on a culture mostly lost to assimilation.

    49. Re:Why are we so surprized? by Hittite+Creosote · · Score: 1

      You understate - not only do people still use bronze, it is used widely - Google for "bronze bearings", or look at the major bearings outside the drive train on any piece of off-road or earth moving equipment. Not only do plenty of people still know about bronze, they also know that which mix is best depends on your application. I'd say more people know about bronze than have ever done in the past. More people know about crop rotation than have ever previously done. Even in 'dead languages' this can apply - there are more people able to read Babylonian now than there were in the reign of Nebuchadnezzar.

    50. Re:Why are we so surprized? by gutu · · Score: 1

      This reminds me a time when my grandma asked me to explain what these computers are all about. I compared computer memory to a fishnet where knots indicate bits and vertical lines of knots denoted one letter. That was intuitive enough for her to understand it.

      We have strings to our past.

    51. Re:Why are we so surprized? by BattleWolf · · Score: 1
      Seven things per brain (at the same time) driving to work:

      Female: Hair-do; Driving; Cell phone; Makeup; Car Radio; Lighting Cigarette; Screaming at Kids

      Male: driving; sex; driving; sex; sex; driving; sex

    52. Re:Why are we so surprized? by batkid · · Score: 1

      Seven days in a week? That may be the reason why they used 7 bits.

    53. Re:Why are we so surprized? by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1
      "7-bit though, that's what I find interesting. Wonder where 7 bits comes from. 10 or 5 --that I'd understand. 7, perhaps someone who'd been in a terrible accident?!"

      Perhaps 7-bit was the best balance between encoding a lot of data and not having strings that were too long and cumbersome. I wouldn't be surprised if they found older ones that were 9 bit or 5 bit before a '7-bit standard' was agreed upon. </speculation>

    54. Re:Why are we so surprized? by jd · · Score: 2, Interesting
      3, 4 and 7 have very strong mythological connections for many civilizations.


      Let's start with 3. Scroll down to the bottom of the Independent's article, and note the identical construction of the Sumerian stone and the Rosetta stone. Both translated the same thing into 3 languages.


      AFAIK, there's never been a stone with a transcription in two languages (which would be logical for treaties, etc), or evidence of the same transcription being later added to (which would be logical when new trading routes are formed). No. We only get the same text in three forms, all carved at the same time.


      Three is also considered "lucky". To the best of my knowledge, this isn't a new myth but one that extends as far back as is tracable.


      Four is a nice symbolic number. You can do a lot with squares. Squares, four-pointed symbols, etc, seem to be common in early symbols. Four seems to have also been a common number to symbolise completeness. The four horsemen, for example.


      Seven, again, seems to have a lot of ancient significance. Again, it's a "lucky number" and has a lot of mythological references.


      However, as you've probably figured out by now, most of this is for European cultures. The natives of the Americas were there a long time before European culture flourished.


      If we see the same numbers in Inca culture, we can conclude one of two things. Either these numbers were sufficiently handy that cultures were more likely to use them than some other set, OR the numbers gained importance prior to the Arctic crossing into America.


      The first possibility seems the more logical. After all, farmers used 3-stage and 4-stage crop rotation, not because these numbers were mentioned in mythology, but because that was a really good number of stages to have in a crop rotation scheme.


      (In fact, many of today's farming problems are likely caused by the lack of crop rotation in many places. Farmers tend to replant the same crop in the same place, relying on fertilizers to make up for the exhaustion of the soil.)


      Also, triangles and squares are much easier to construct with primitive tools than, say, duodecagons or fractals. This makes three-sided and four-sided shapes vastly more preferable to something more complex.


      Septahedrons (seven-sided shapes) aren't particularly common, true, but once you have 3 and 4 as "magic numbers", then 7 and 12 automatically gain some "special" significance.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    55. Re:Why are we so surprized? by Zeriel · · Score: 1

      Possibly more to the point, do YOU know how to make stainless steel? Does anyone you know have that knowledge?

      --
      "America has done some terrible things. But I know that Americans don't cheer when innocents die." -Dave Barry
    56. Re:Why are we so surprized? by overbom · · Score: 1

      The more we learn, the more we forget.

      This may be true. At the same time, though, the more we learn, the more we earn. One good truism deserves another. :-)

      We tend to have such an ego about ourselves.

      Pretty much every culture that's left its mark on the world has had the same. We're not special in that regard.

      I don't mean to troll, but you sound akin to a poster child for the Society of Creative Anachronisms. As technology progresses, there is bound to be knowledge that becomes arcane or obscure. It's always happened, it's a fact of life. People learn that there is a better or easier way to do it. People probably complained about progress on the doorsteps of the Great Library at Alexandria on its opening day.

    57. Re:Why are we so surprized? by Quino · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't if be fair to say that it's a system that's "hard to read but also write" because we're not used to thinking about it? (you're voicing my grandma's opinion on binary: who doesn't get it, to her it seems unnecessariy complicated: what the hell do we need it for?). :)

      Seriously though, I'm not sure what you're trying to say, some wrote on clay, or stone, and here, it appears they used string.

      The unique thing is they used binary -- pretty weird (and I thought interesting).

      Not sure why you see it as a direct comparison of what system of writing / civilization is better ... (what's your point?)

      PS

      like how long it took for the zero to be "discovered" It doesn't even make sense to me that there could be math without a zero, or that it was a concept that had to be discovered (it just seems so incredibly obvious --- but apparently it's not, it's more of a lack of perspective on my part).

    58. Re:Why are we so surprized? by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1
      " Hey, you know what? At least we have a written language. I'm not so impressed that the Incas used a complicated system of tying colored knots on string that *kinda* resembles binary when you consider how much easier it would've been to just write the information down."

      Open your mind.

      Consider that the tying-knots type of information storage might have been used only for actual record keeping. A string with a bunch of knots is a lot more durable than a piece of parchment with ink on in. Don't the rainforests of central america have periodic flooding? Those stings can sit under water for a while an survive nicely while pieces of paper would not survive.

      And besides, how do you know it would have been easier to write things down? Did they have a decent supply of paper back then? A decent supply of writing instruments? Maybe the string method *was* easier.

    59. Re:Why are we so surprized? by Peyna · · Score: 1

      Nah, it's all just coincidence. =]

      There are countless tales of floods; I would find it very hard to believe it is not true. =]

      --
      What?
    60. Re:Why are we so surprized? by karlm · · Score: 1

      So we have the Incas to blame for the internet still not being 8-bit clean and having to base64-encode everything so our 8-bit/byte data is in a subset of our 7-bit ASCII alphabet? The Spanish should have burned all those khipu and started them over on a 128-bit system so we'd have widepsread IPv6 back in 1905, and Unicde built into the first computers! Stupid legacy systems!

      --
      Copyright Violation:"theft, piracy"::Anti-Trust Violation:"thermonuclear price terrorism"<-Overly dramatic language.
    61. Re:Why are we so surprized? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so, um... whenever you see someone walking around not holding up any fingers you go up to him and say "Just one of WHAT?"

    62. Re:Why are we so surprized? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      7 bit: They used Commodores. Thank God for IBM, because we'd share their fate if we stayed on the commie standard.

    63. Re:Why are we so surprized? by BenTels0 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Absolutely. After all, the ancient Egyptians had an algorithm for multiplying large numbers based on addition and the fact that every number can be written as a power of two (although they never literally wrapped their minds around that last part).
      What they did was this:

      Say you want to multiply 17 and 31.

      1 * 31 = 31
      2 * 31 = 31 + 31 = 62
      4 * 31 = 62 + 62 = 124
      8 * 31 = 124 + 124 = 248
      16 * 31 = 248 + 248 = 496

      17 = 16 + 1, so 17 * 31 = 496 + 31 = 527

      For that matter, the Babylonians counted in base 60 and used floating point numbers.

    64. Re:Why are we so surprized? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
      Actually it was the mayans and the aztecs who had the wheels on toys. However, they had no large animals to really make use of the carts.
      Even if that's true (and I've read something like that before) I don't get it. It's a lot easier moving bricks in a wheelbarrow than carrying them.
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    65. Re:Why are we so surprized? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just because people didn't write zero on the page, doesn't mean they didn't know what it was. Every langauge has a word corresponding to "none." And every mathematical system had a way of expressing '10'. The Romans used 'X'. The only thing zero as a place holder is useful for is simplifying arithmatic, as in doing longhand subtraction. Most people can, with a little practice, do simple arithmatic in their head. It's only since people under the age of ten have been practicing math on scratch paper that any advantage of a zero placeholder has become apparent.

    66. Re:Why are we so surprized? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They could have used some of that knot tying ability to weave cloth. It's great for writing on. And since they already knew how to dye the string, I think all the necessary technology and resources were there.

    67. Re:Why are we so surprized? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
      how much easier it would've been to just write the information down.
      Well yeah, like if you've got paper (or something similar). If, however, you are blessed with copious quantities of cordage, then maybe macrame[1] is the easier communication method.

      [1] No, it's not a kind of pasta.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    68. Re:Why are we so surprized? by cens0r · · Score: 1

      No one knows why the mayans and aztecs never improved on the wheel. An interesting study would be to see if cultures that did independently develop the wheel developed hand carts before they developed carts for draft animals.

      --
      Jack Valenti and Orrin Hatch will be first up against the wall when the revolution comes.
    69. Re:Why are we so surprized? by dekashizl · · Score: 1

      IETF (Inca Engineering Task Force)

      RFC # 425

      STANDARD FOR THE FORMAT OF

      KHIPU (BEAD STRINGS)

      Pachana 14, 1282

      Revised by

      Huaxxula Wuayata

      Dept. of Beadworks
      Inca Plains University

      ...

      4.2. STRUCTURED BEAD SEQUENCES

      Pachamama dictates that bead sequences MUST BE EXACTLY 7 beads. Failure to comply with this sequence pattern MAY RESULT in cataclysmic incident with large asteroid.

    70. Re:Why are we so surprized? by MrResistor · · Score: 1

      Think: how else to you code data on a string?

      Ever heard of macrame? There are all kinds of ways to encode data on a string, and no need to limit yourself to binary.

      For example, who can tell me the best mix for bronze? Not many now.

      Not many then, either. The Hittites managed to keep that a secret for quite some time (at least decades), and later they did the same with iron. Of course, not everyone had access to tin, so how to make bronze wasn't even necessarily relevant or useful information. That they kept iron a secret for so long is impressive, since iron is so common. Even when that was "common" knowledge, though, it wasn't all that common. It might have been common knowledge among smiths, depending on the specific time period we're talking about, but the average man-on-the-street wouldn't have a clue any more than the average-man-on-the-street today would if asked "emacs or vi?"

      To answer your question directly though, here is how they made it back in the day, and you can find here[1] information that will help you find the best bronze for your specific purpose (since, as with all things, it depends on what you want to do with it). Of course, I could also go to the library and check out a book or two on the subject, or if I were really serious I could call up my best friend, who's a materials engineer, or another guy I know who made his own bronze dagger recently.

      My point is, that information is readily available if I care to look for it. That wasn't the case back then, when such things as how to make a particular alloy were closely guarded secrets. That's the fundamental difference that makes our society so much more advanced than theirs. For that reason, I think I'll stay comfortably on my high horse, although I'll agree that we've always been ingenious.

      As for the 7-bit thing, ASCII is 7-bit, and the Intel 4004 was 4-bit. Why? Sometimes there are reasons for doing things other than the number of digits on your hand. Sometimes it just makes sense to use a different base. Hell, why use binary at all? There are such things as analog computers. It probably just made sense to use 7-bit encoding for the data they were trying to record. 5 probably wasn't enough, and 10 would have left the upper 3 places empty, why waste them? If we figure out what it was they were actually recording, it would likely be quite clear why they used 7.

      [1] Sorry I can't provide a direct link, scroll down to Raw Materials and Springs, click on Metals, and choose Bronze from the list. If you then click on Catalog Pages you'll get actual recipes.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    71. Re:Why are we so surprized? by Cereal+Box · · Score: 1

      You moron, you can easily dab whatever they were using for coloring on dried-out LEAVES and there you have it ... a written alternative to tying knots in rope.

    72. Re:Why are we so surprized? by Cereal+Box · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't if be fair to say that it's a system that's "hard to read but also write" because we're not used to thinking about it? (you're voicing my grandma's opinion on binary: who doesn't get it, to her it seems unnecessariy complicated: what the hell do we need it for?). :)

      Uh no. It's more like what's easier to read, a couple words written on a page or "red knot, blue knot, red knot, yellow knot, (... ten feet of rope later ...), orange knot, red knot"? It's also harder to "write" because instead of making a stroke or two on a page you're having to tie knots AND paint them.

      WTF am I getting modded "troll" here? I'm asking an honest question... these guys could've dabbed their paint on dried out leaves and the same effect would've been accomplished except they wouldn't need to lug around knotted ropes.

    73. Re:Why are we so surprized? by Tailhook · · Score: 1

      We tend to have such an ego about ourselves.

      Who is this we? You know squat about me or my ego. Keep your presumptions to your high-horsed self, mkay? If you're blathering about some general "we", you're a dime a dozen and I can't for the life of me figure out why anyone would bother to moderate you up. So many self-loathing muckitymucks stumbling around...

      Do you suppose the Inca had ancestors they failed to revere? Did they also overlook the contribution of their ancestors to the minutia of their existence? I'll bet there were even backbiting little Inca self-haters, much like yourself, that took whatever opportunity presented itself to berate his peers for their ignorance.

      Thanks.

      --
      Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
    74. Re:Why are we so surprized? by chord.wav · · Score: 1

      Think: how else do you code data on a string?

      What about Morse?

      And correct me if I'm wrong but I think were romans who used to cipher data wrapping a very long and thin piece of paper around a pole of certain radio (It could be read, only if you had a pole with the same radio). You could do that with a string too.

      Just thinking loud..

    75. Re:Why are we so surprized? by magarity · · Score: 1

      What do you expect when almost all cities have sprung up around rivers?

    76. Re:Why are we so surprized? by Ben+Hutchings · · Score: 1

      Seems more like astrology than astronomy. It doesn't seem very clever to me to choose where to settle based on the movement of the moon, rather than practical considerations like availability of water and farmland.

    77. Re:Why are we so surprized? by Eideewt · · Score: 1

      I wonder if that could be because a phone number has seven digits (in the U.S. at least, I don't know about elsewhere). I can't think of very many non-phone numbers that long that people need to remember, so maybe people hadn't developed the ability to remember more. I haven't found myself having difficulty remembering an extra 3 for the area code, so maybe it's a case of rising to the occasion.

    78. Re:Why are we so surprized? by nfk · · Score: 1

      Google is your friend.

      http://www.bssa.org.uk/nsindex.htm
      http://www.steel.sandvik.com/techdata/

      I looked for information on iron ore mining too, and related issues, and it's possible to find it. More to the point, as someone mentioned, we don't need to have an expert in every field, in every neighborhood, because in the mean time we evolved to large scale markets and specialization. It's been a long time since there was a man who knew about everything, or most things, generally speaking. What is important is that we, as a whole, can do most things that comprise current human knowledge, and there is redundancy, both in human and material resources, with information scattered all over the world.

    79. Re:Why are we so surprized? by eatdave13 · · Score: 1
      I don't, but yeah, someone I know does, I'm pretty sure. You must mean "know personally", or you'd be able to answer your own question, because it's not necessary to be friends with a person to get information out of them. If he didn't know, a couple hours of Google or maybe even a couple hundred dollars spent on books would tell me how to do it. Somebody in the bronze age, however, couldn't tell me how to make steel no matter how long I gave them.

      The thing is, I don't need to know how to make stainless steel. I'll bet 90-95% of the people that know how to make stainless steel couldn't tell me how to implement a linked list or a red-black tree. There's a good chance that the guy who knew how to make bronze also knew how to rotate crops, but there's so much more information today that it would be impossible for everyone to know everything about our science and culture. We're more specialized and more dependant on each other, but this allows us to have things like antibiotics, people farming for more than subsistence, vacations to Maui, and tech support.

      I guess it's debatable whether we're smarter than they were, but there's no question that we have a better standard of living than they did. Just because they may have been able to recreate their society after a nuclear blast doesn't make them better than us. We could recreate their culture if we wanted to, it just sucked. ;)

      --
      "Verbing weirds language." -- Calvin
    80. Re:Why are we so surprized? by B1ackDragon · · Score: 1

      Incas... Incas.. I don't remember much about the Incas at this time.

      But I do know the ancient Mayans used seven in about everything, I can't remember what the tourguide said was the probable reason (if there was one) though.

      Yeah, I took a trip to Cancun, and we went and visited the Chichaniza (yeah thats spelled wrong) temple. All their serpent drawings had seven segments, seven steps on the pyramid... pretty crazy.

      Oh, and the Inca's and the Mayas came into contact at some point as I remember.

      --
      The snow doesn't give a soft white damn whom it touches. -- ee cummings
    81. Re:Why are we so surprized? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No mystery here. Seven bits for ASCII of course.

    82. Re:Why are we so surprized? by Zeriel · · Score: 1

      And you both made my point effectively. That is that someone, somewhere can do it, so we don't have to. =P

      --
      "America has done some terrible things. But I know that Americans don't cheer when innocents die." -Dave Barry
    83. Re:Why are we so surprized? by LowTolerance · · Score: 1

      That's an excellent point. Math is not too much more advanced now than it was in the days of the Greeks.

    84. Re:Why are we so surprized? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "We tend to have such an ego about ourselves."
      Uuhh no .Only you Americans.

    85. Re:Why are we so surprized? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
      dab whatever they were using for coloring on dried-out LEAVES
      While I'm not an expert on the particular botany of central America, I'll tell you some things about leaves in general. Firstly, they often have a waxy surface which makes it hard for paint to adhere. Secondly, they're often not flat. Thirdly, when dried, they often go brittle and crumbly. I can just picture it - you order a book from Amazon and by the time it arrives via runner it's a bouquet garni.

      Seems to me you've been using dried leaves for something other than writing on.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  10. 7 bit binary CAN mean 1500 things by brunes69 · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Think about it for more than 0.5 seconds why don't you. ASCII code is only 7 bit and it can represent every word in the English (and many other) languages.Just because you have a 7 bit code does not mean you cant repeat values made up from that code.

    Next time think before you say someone doesn't know what they are talking about and make yourself a fool.

    1. Re:7 bit binary CAN mean 1500 things by Shanep · · Score: 1

      Next time think before you say someone doesn't know what they are talking about and make yourself a fool.

      You can only make a few words with a single 7 bit value. Words like "a" and "I". You can't just say, "use it over and over" because that arguement doesn't hold any water.

      It's kinda like saying, "sure, I've only got a 10GB hard drive, but I can hold Terrabytes if I keep deleting stuff!"

      It's all about how much data some finite storage space can hold at one given time.

      --
      War crimes, torture, lies, illegal spying... Would someone give Bush a blowjob, already, so he can be impeached?
    2. Re:7 bit binary CAN mean 1500 things by brunes69 · · Score: 1

      I can make a rope with the encyclopedia britanica encoded on it given a long enough rope. So how does this not hold water again?

    3. Re:7 bit binary CAN mean 1500 things by jorgen · · Score: 2, Funny

      Dude, how do you represent every word in the english language using only 1 (one) 7-bit character?

    4. Re:7 bit binary CAN mean 1500 things by jorgen · · Score: 1

      The question was really how many values you can represent using 7 binary bits (which is 128), not how many words you can write using 7-bit characters.

      In this case, they actually *could* represent 1500 values using 7 bits, because they were using more than one colour (which means it wasnt actually binary at all).

      RTFA, why don't you...

    5. Re:7 bit binary CAN mean 1500 things by brunes69 · · Score: 1

      Whoever said there was only 1 character? You can put more than one character on a rope, or you can us e abunch of ropes, or whatever.

    6. Re:7 bit binary CAN mean 1500 things by twelveinchbrain · · Score: 1

      RTFA, all of you. One of the 7 bits was not base-2, but base-24. 2^6 * 24 = 1536.

      --
      Not Found
      The requested URL /signature.html was not found on this server.
    7. Re:7 bit binary CAN mean 1500 things by Shanep · · Score: 1

      I can make a rope with the encyclopedia britanica encoded on it given a long enough rope. So how does this not hold water again?

      If you are talking about the number of discrete values a certain number of binary bits can resolve, then you should stick to that number of bits!

      If you start claiming that we can just "add some bits to resolve more" then your argument moves beyond the question and is not valid.

      It's like being asked how much 7 binary bits can resolve and then replying that 500 million of them can hold an encyclopedia.

      You are changing the question within your answer.

      --
      War crimes, torture, lies, illegal spying... Would someone give Bush a blowjob, already, so he can be impeached?
  11. Does that mean by T40+Dude · · Score: 5, Funny

    that the Incas OWN SCO ????

    1. Re:Does that mean by Surak · · Score: 5, Funny

      No. It means that the Incas invented the Internet, but I think that Al Gore invented the Incas, who in turn created the Internet. The SCO came along and they claim that they invented Al Gore. I don't get it either, don't worry.

    2. Re:Does that mean by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But Strom Thurmond was older than all of them while he was still alive.

    3. Re:Does that mean by mysticgoat · · Score: 1

      Ooh! Prior art! I love it!

      Well, at a minimum this means that binary encoded string data is a little older than ENIAC or Lady Lovelace's work.

    4. Re:Does that mean by anno1a · · Score: 2, Funny

      Nono, you got it all wrong.
      Al Gore invented the Incas, the Incas invented the Internet, SCO bought Al Gore and now claims they own the Internet.

      --
      ------- I fumbled my registration and I now must suffer
  12. Not unique by Ceriel+Nosforit · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The Chinese I Ching uses 6 bit binary to map 64 symbols, one bit essentially being a 'yes' or 'no' answer from a form of oracle. There's a bit more math behind it, but that's the core of it.
    The symbols provide an array of wisedom and advice for those who map them.

    Oddly enough, Terence McKenna managed to calculate the end of the world to December 21, 2012 using I Ching, while the Incas (Or was it Mayas? I confuse them.) calculated it to the same date. - Behold the powers of binary.

    --
    All rites reversed 2010
    1. Re:Not unique by tjensor · · Score: 5, Funny

      So not only did they have binary - they had Oracle.

      Thangyouverymuch I'll be here all week.

      --
      <fnord>OBEY</fnord>
    2. Re:Not unique by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oddly enough, Terence McKenna managed to calculate the end of the world to December 21, 2012 using I Ching, while the Incas (Or was it Mayas? I confuse them.) calculated it to the same date. - Behold the powers of binary.

      Nah, that's not the end of the world, it just means that they've run out of bits, are overflowing, and will have to move to a 12 bit timestamp. They've just found their equivelent of Y2K.

    3. Re:Not unique by Surak · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, you have some details wrong, but you've got the gist right. Specifically, it was December 22, 2012, and it was the Mayans, not the Incas as you seemed to indicate.

      From the disinformation co. (what was that I said about critical thinking again? ;) :

      "According to occult scientist Terence McKenna, the end of the world as we know it will occur at 11:10 PM, December 22, 2012 and he's worked out a computer model based on an intuitive decoding of the I Ching to prove it mathematically. Before you scoff at McKenna's claims, bear in mind that the ancient Mayan calendar, a calendar accurate to within MINUTES for THOUSANDS of years ends at precisely the same time... But McKenna is no mere doomsday prophet and once you've been exposed to the psychedelic mindscape of the man referred to as 'the Timothy Leary of the Nineties' (by Leary himself!), your worldview may never be the same ever again...."

    4. Re:Not unique by Ceriel+Nosforit · · Score: 1

      Well, maybe that's how they managed to organize their empire.
      But then again the empire fell...
      Oracle has done a good job of covering up that piece of corporate history, but the truth is finally reveiled! Thank the pantheon for MySQL!

      --
      All rites reversed 2010
    5. Re:Not unique by Anonymous+Coed · · Score: 0
      That's funny, because some of Oracle's error messages look like prohesies from the I-Ching:
      ORA-9666: If you meet the Buddha on the road, kill him.
    6. Re:Not unique by loconet · · Score: 2, Informative

      Mayas = Mexico
      Incas = Peru, Bolivia, etc

      --
      [alk]
    7. Re:Not unique by bj8rn · · Score: 1

      The stress is on as we know it. If I remember correctly, the Mayas didn't say that the world will end completely, it was just the end of one cycle and the beginning of the next one.

      --
      Hell is not other people; it is yourself. - Ludwig Wittgenstein
    8. Re:Not unique by joshv · · Score: 1

      Oddly enough, Terence McKenna managed to calculate the end of the world to December 21, 2012 using I Ching, while the Incas (Or was it Mayas? I confuse them.) calculated it to the same date. - Behold the powers of binary.

      Huh, they must have both been doing something like storing their dates in 32 bit integers. This currently give the end of the world as a date in 2038.

      -josh

    9. Re:Not unique by ScreamingSlave · · Score: 1

      The Mayans had a system of "binary" based on 0, 1, and 20 if I remember right.

    10. Re:Not unique by kryliss · · Score: 0

      It was the Mayan calender that ends on Dec 12, 2012.

      --
      --- If the bible proves the existence of God, then Superman comics prove the existence of Superman.
    11. Re:Not unique by RickHunter · · Score: 1

      Very true. The Maya added levels to their calendar as their civilization progressed because the dates kept rolling over. Apparently, the idea of an open-ended dating/counting system never occurred to them. The Maya "Great Cycle" was simply the last of these extensions - the priests who set it up figured a couple of thousand years would be enough for anyone.

    12. Re:Not unique by chrisbtoo · · Score: 3, Funny

      "According to occult scientist Terence McKenna, the end of the world as we know it will occur at 11:10 PM, December 22, 2012[...]"

      Which timezone was that, again? Or are we expecting the world to end in 24 arbitrarily defined chunks throughout the day?

      --
      Registering accounts later than some other chrisb since 1997
    13. Re:Not unique by Dstrct0 · · Score: 0, Funny

      We need a "+1 Spooky" moderation option

      --
      Build boards not bombs
    14. Re:Not unique by Surak · · Score: 1

      I dunno. It isn't my theory. I'd ask Terence McKenna, but unfortunately, he's rather late.

    15. Re:Not unique by ElGanzoLoco · · Score: 2, Informative

      Azteques: Northern Mexico
      Maya: Southern Mexico, Guatemala, Belize, Salvador... etc.
      Incas: Perou, Chili, Bolivia (Andine mountains)

      Mayas used a 20-number basis and could perform any operation using a grid similar to a chess board. They could predict solar eclipses using the grid, beans and sticks... Impressive. Maybe they called it "grid computing"... [insert beowulf cluster joke here].

      --
      Hello! I'm a disaster waiting to happen!
    16. Re:Not unique by AshPattern · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, that's not entirely true.

      If you read his book, the timewave created by the "fractalization" of a differential graph of the King Woo sequence terminates at zero and is undefined thereafter. He set the terminal point at December 21st, 2012 because the Mayas did. He then observed that his graph matched what we knew of the past. Maybe.

      In any case, he did not mysteriously come up with the same date.

    17. Re:Not unique by bj8rn · · Score: 3, Interesting
      An interesting thing is how the existence of writing in South American civilizations seems to be connected to their attitude towards the Spanish. The Incas had quipus, Aztecs had pictogrammatic writing, Mayas had some kind of early-stage phonetic alphabet. When the Spanish came, the Incas were certain that they were gods; Aztecs believed it in the beginning, but later realised that the Spanish are humans just like themselves. Mayas raised the question, then answered it negatively and never called the Spanish gods.

      The possible explanation is, that the evolution of writing is affected by the evolution of mental structures and categories: the Incas saw everything unfamiliar as supernatural, having been isolated from other cultures. The Aztecs and (particularly) the Mayas had had contacts with other cultures besides their own, so they know what it means to be conquered by a more advanced civilization.

      --
      Hell is not other people; it is yourself. - Ludwig Wittgenstein
    18. Re:Not unique by Woy · · Score: 1

      This is very interesting. Do you have links to explore on this subject?

      Thanks.

      --
      "If God created us in his own image we have more than reciprocated." - Voltaire
    19. Re:Not unique by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2038 i thought that is when nix box's blow up

    20. Re:Not unique by rigau · · Score: 1

      actually the mayas are more of a guatemala group. the aztecs and toltecs are the ones in mejico.

    21. Re:Not unique by Q+Who · · Score: 1

      In other words, this "scientist" made his "intuitive decoding" to fall on the day of Mayan calendar's end... which is accurate to within MINUTES for THOUSANDS of years...

      This is so impressive, I have to hold my panties.

    22. Re:Not unique by Woy · · Score: 1
      "According to occult scientist Terence McKenna, the end of the world as we know it will occur at 11:10 PM, December 22, 2012[...]"

      Which timezone was that, again? Or are we expecting the world to end in 24 arbitrarily defined chunks throughout the day?

      I think it is unpolite for intelligent people to poke holes in the theories of ignorant occult "experts". If you think about it, it is true they are irritating but it's like a grown man punching a child.

      --
      "If God created us in his own image we have more than reciprocated." - Voltaire
    23. Re:Not unique by maraist · · Score: 2, Insightful

      the Incas saw everything unfamiliar as supernatural, having been isolated from other cultures.

      It's an interesting perspective, because most European cultures believed similarly; except that more specificly than supernatural, the unfamiliar was considered demonic in nature (Surely God has revealed all that is good and pure to us in our sacred texts).

      --
      -Michael
    24. Re:Not unique by bj8rn · · Score: 1

      I myself read about it from "The Conquest of America" by Tzvetan Todorov. I have no more links to enlightenment to hand out though (but I will put this subject on my to-explore list), sorry...

      --
      Hell is not other people; it is yourself. - Ludwig Wittgenstein
    25. Re:Not unique by bj8rn · · Score: 1

      It's actually a common thing in all cultures to call the outsiders demons or monsters or cultureless. Greeks called all the others barbarians, because they considered Greek the only language and everything else was just babbling (though I think they changed their way of thinking later). For the old Slavians(?), everybody else were 'nemec', speechless (they still call Germans this way). The Chinese stopped only lately calling the foreigners nomads (I think). This sentence about the Incas is only my interpretation of what I have read, so don't take this as the absolute truth, but I think it should still describe the situation quite well.

      --
      Hell is not other people; it is yourself. - Ludwig Wittgenstein
    26. Re:Not unique by smack_attack · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The cover of the MySQL book by New Riders has a picture of Mayan ruins.

      How weird is that?

    27. Re:Not unique by Surak · · Score: 1

      Well, if you look at the graph, he basically did come up with the same date. True, he started from an assumption, and then proved out his assumption, but isn't that the scientific method anyway? Start from a theory and then seek to prove or to disprove it?

    28. Re:Not unique by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      the Mayas didn't say that the world will end completely, it was just the end of one cycle and the beginning of the next one.

      Yes. During one cycle, the earth was creating. During another, creatures formed. Then everything went to hell as a god got mad and destroyed everything. Each cycle was a different 'sun' ruled by a different god, often upset at the last and doing Grave Things to change the world. After a few times (i don't remember which iteration of the world the Mayan's world is, let's say 6th to be like Neo) it was the Mayan's world. Point is, each end-of-cycle is drastic change.

    29. Re:Not unique by cybercuzco · · Score: 1

      wasnt 2038 supposed to be when that asteroid was supposed to hit the earth?

      --

    30. Re:Not unique by friscolr · · Score: 1
      Mayas = Mexico

      No, Copan is in Honduras and Tikal (as seen in Star Wars A New Hope) is in Guatemala. There are a bunch of other Mayan sites throughout those countries but i can't remember any other names; Copan and Tikal are two of the most famous Mayan sites.

    31. Re:Not unique by operagost · · Score: 1

      So, if the Mayan civilization had survived, they'd be scrambling to fix the Year 2012 problem in a few years ...

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    32. Re:Not unique by daVinci1980 · · Score: 1

      Two things:

      1) My calendar runs out at Tue Jan 19 03:14:07 2038. Does that mean the world is going to end then?
      2) I believe Penn and Teller discussed just how many end of the world predictions have occurred since the beginning of time on their show Bullsh*t (which, if you have showtime, you should definitely watch). Its ridiculous how many of these predictions there actually are. Here's a brief clip (RealPlayer req'd, sorry).

      --
      I currently have no clever signature witicism to add here.
    33. Re:Not unique by Deagol · · Score: 1

      The empire fell because they went bankrupt paying the Oracle licensing.

    34. Re:Not unique by mushanti · · Score: 1

      Benjamin Franklin constructed the above (see url) panmagic square having magic constant 260. Any half-row or half-column in this square totals 130, and the four corners plus the middle total 260. In addition, bent diagonals (such as 52-3-5-54-10-57-63-16) also total 260 (Madachy 1979, p. 87).

      http://mathworld.wolfram.com/FranklinMagicSquare .h tml

      Not sure, though I think this is how Terrence Mckenna was able to map the I Ching to the 13:20 Mayan Calendar.

      More on Terrece's mathematical predictions (aka Timewave Zero):
      http://www.levity.com/eschaton/waveexplain .html
      http://www.levity.com/eschaton/bombshell.ht ml
      http://fusionanomaly.net/timewavezero.html

      --
      om gate gate paragate parasamgate bodhi svaha
    35. Re:Not unique by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>while the Incas (Or was it Mayas? I confuse them.)

      Yeah because it is so easy to confuse. One died out around 800 AD and the other was conquered by the Spanish in the 1500s. One was in Central America and the other was in South America. One had a written system similar to hieroglyphics and the other used the Quipu. Gee so tough to keep them straight.

      You can tell the difference between Peru and Guatemala, can't you?

    36. Re:Not unique by Zeriel · · Score: 1

      I'd imagine it's in the timezone that the Mayans were in, which I think corresponds to US Eastern or maybe US Central (-5 / -6).

      Eh, like most "occult scientists" his math is right on, but his assumption (specifically that the Mayans knew WTF they were talking about) is probably invalid for any kind of real prediction.

      --
      "America has done some terrible things. But I know that Americans don't cheer when innocents die." -Dave Barry
    37. Re:Not unique by schon · · Score: 1

      the end of the world as we know it will occur at 11:10 PM, December 22, 2012

      Cool! That means I won't have to upgrade my 32-bit libc after all!

      he's worked out a computer model based on an intuitive decoding of the I Ching

      Does anyone else see anything wrong with that sentence? A computer model based on intuition.

      Unless he's talking about the Amiga's GUI, I'm a little sceptical.

    38. Re:Not unique by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember though that Terrence was most always under the influence of powerful halucinogens. It was the Mayas, and they too (their shamans anyway) used some of the same powerful halucinogens. So the end of the world number could perhaps be the end of the world for something, most likely the plant that produced the powerful hallucinogen they were on. So 2012 could be the end of shrooms. Get your supply now!

    39. Re:Not unique by Ceriel+Nosforit · · Score: 1

      To answer you question, and bite the bait; no.

      --
      All rites reversed 2010
    40. Re:Not unique by starfish23 · · Score: 1

      McKenna has stated that he was not aware of the end date of the Mayan calendar until after he came up with the 20121221 date.

      Dom

    41. Re:Not unique by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Azteques: Northern Mexico Maya: Southern Mexico, Guatemala, Belize, Salvador... etc. Incas: Perou, Chili, Bolivia (Andine mountains)
      They all look the same, though.
    42. Re:Not unique by Ceriel+Nosforit · · Score: 1

      Well, there's a lot of information on the net regarding this, but the most difficult part is determining the quacks from the sages.
      Persoanlly I take everything into concideration, but if the piece doesn't fit it's not part of the puzzle. To simply dismiss every idea that doesn't rock your boat is ignorant to say the least, but still if it rubs you the wrong way it might very well be false. To study occultism basicly means that you'll have to _really_ like reading, 'cos you're going to be spending a lot of time doing that.

      Some further advice:
      Go to the source and do not accept other people's interpritation of a certain work as fact. still, take them into concideration.
      A lot of occultists, especially Wiccans (the goddess bless their good hearts), don't have a scientific mindset and are often superstitious. By that I mean that some of their words and actions are not based on their own reason.
      Pythagoras was an occultist, but your math teacher didn't tell you that.
      Aristoteles was a lot smarter than the people dismissing his ideas as superstition.

      Also, 'occult' means hidden, so you'll have to use quite a bit of your own wit to get anywhere. Many claim this is to prevent any idiot from abusing this knowledge.

      As for linking. Nah, I'll let you google your way to the information you want. If you work for it you'll appriciate it more. =)

      A final word of advice:
      Some of the people who wrote the texts you'll find managed to scare themselves half to death in their research. If they give you a warning about something, it just might be a good idea to at least listen to them.

      P.S.
      Texts from the Theosophical Society are very heavy reading and throw Life, the Universe and Everthing (kitchen sink?) at you like you were a chardcore guru. The ideas they present usually need quite a bit of time to be understood.

      --
      All rites reversed 2010
    43. Re:Not unique by 73939133 · · Score: 1

      Well, that's all nice and good, but the one and true binary calendar, the UNIX calendar, ends on Jan 19, 2038. So, that is really the end of all time and the beginning of a new cycle.

    44. Re:Not unique by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dammit, looks like i'll die a virgin in 2012.

    45. Re:Not unique by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Each cycle was a different 'sun' ruled by a different god

      So, maybe 2012 was when the Mayans planned to move on to the next star system?

      Or perhaps that's when they intend to return to this one...

    46. Re:Not unique by loconet · · Score: 1

      I agree, they were more central america but they were in southern mexico too

      --
      [alk]
    47. Re:Not unique by loconet · · Score: 1

      I agree, they were more central america but they were in southern mexico as well

      --
      [alk]
  13. Great! So, SCO itself is in violation?? by jkrise · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    After all, SCOde is derived from the binary code which they invented, right? Seeing that a Peruvian Doctor (I keep forgetting his name) wrote that unforgettable letter to MS, we could ask him to speak up for the Incas.

    There's no hurry to present any evidence - we can always dig up proof later, and that could take ages.

    --
    If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
    1. Re:Great! So, SCO itself is in violation?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      d00d joo ar funnehy1! i lik your wisdoms and stuff. keep on beeing funey okay funney boy. teh sco is owningz all teh binaries so they are illegal! har har. aftah you ar finished with my ass hat, can i hav it back?

    2. Re:Great! So, SCO itself is in violation?? by SComps · · Score: 1

      ---
      There's no hurry to present any evidence - we can always dig up proof later, and that could take ages
      ---

      I have no karma. My boyfriend tells me that all the time.

  14. Poor Microsoft by Boss,+Pointy+Haired · · Score: 5, Funny

    So that's prior art to their 1's and 0's patent then.

    1. Re:Poor Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sometimes I think the reporters for the Onion don't really have a good grip on reality. I'm pretty sure that they are all stoners, so you might not want to base any decisions or knowledge off of any of the information contained in that journal. Of course, the same holds true for most mainstream media.

  15. Why they used binary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Turns out that Umno Two-Fingers was chosen as the first mathemetician.

  16. I'm confused by LinuxParanoid · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is it binary because it has NOTs, or binary because it has KNOTs?

    1. Re:I'm confused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sinatra sang truer than he knew, eh? "I've got the world on a string..."

    2. Re:I'm confused by phfpht · · Score: 1

      No no no: If it were Boolean it would have NOTS If it were Bow-lean it would have KNOTS. (though knots are also found in things of Not-ical persuasion).

  17. Legal Implications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Careful translation of this newly-discovered encoding could reveal large sections of unix code, possibly with comments and the real original copyright notices intact, thus putting an end to the debate and sending SCO back where they came from.

    In addition, this might represent prior art for various data storage systems. Don't think IBM is out of the woods yet, with this prior art to look over.

  18. You're new here... by Gothmolly · · Score: 1, Funny

    This is Slashdot, don't read the articles!!!

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
  19. Nooooo! by Zayin · · Score: 1

    it means the Inca not only invented a form of binary code more than 500 years before the invention of the computer, but they used it as part of the only three-dimensional written language.

    This is an obvious fraud! Everyone knows that Microsoft invented the binary system in 1975.

    --
    "I'd rather have a full bottle in front of me than a full frontal lobotomy"
  20. How does this make them smart again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really, does anyone here write their postcards in binary? If you want to leave a message for your friend, do you scratch a quick note on paper or weave him a message?

    Its an impressive finding, but the fact they would use such a complicated system for communicating seems a little odd.

  21. Wow! 24-bit colour, 500 years ago... by jkrise · · Score: 3, Funny

    And I had to wait till 1993 for the SGI Indigo2 24-bit graphics card, and pay $3,000 for that one!

    --
    If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
    1. Re:Wow! 24-bit colour, 500 years ago... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not 24 bit moron, 24 colors. that's slightly less than 5bit color.

  22. Analysis by Gothmolly · · Score: 3, Insightful

    24 discrete colors = 24 additional bits, so it's NOT a 7bit binary system, its a 31bit system... if you can even call it that. Where the heck did they get the artcile summary from? Next, I'll come up with a new "binary" system that uses 26 strange, mystical symbols from [A-Z].

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    1. Re:Analysis by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1

      ah, it warms my heart to know that even the editors don't bother reading the articles before posting.

    2. Re:Analysis by AlecC · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No: Selecting one of 24 colours is NOT 24 bits. Each Knot may be wool/cotton, ply/crossply, front/back, and so on, plus black/white/red/green... But for each variable you may have only one of each pair and one of the 24 colours. The article is exactly right if you read it carefully.

      --
      Consciousness is an illusion caused by an excess of self consciousness.
    3. Re:Analysis by pbhj · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There are 'several' strings (how many?) and there are 3 permutations for the strings mentioned (the ones in the above post). For each string there are 24 colours (that should have been fun differentiating 24 colours made with 'primitive' dying methods - 'is that dark-blue or midnight-blue is this one corn yellow or straw yellow?')

      So for each string there are 24+3+ maybe a couple more possibilities. Let's say base-29.

      Were does the 7 bit binary come in then?

      Also the bloke says "This could mean the code used by the makers allowed them to convey some 1,536 separate units of information".

      It could. It could be the 24 colours were 24 crops (or different items, perhaps including livestock) and the 4 different variations for each string meant we've got loads, got none, got a few, haven't counted yet. Far less sophisticated than binary.

      It could be that the 24 colours (someone do a list of 24 colour names that are easily recognisable ... I'm probably wrong but it sounds quite hard) are in fact 6 colours in 4 different shades that are due to archeological effects - surrounding matter of the artifacts, exposure to light, cleaning solutions used.

      However, 'I have discovered a writing system comparable with that of Sumerian cuneiform' is sure to persuade an ongoing grant.

      Also, while I'm enjoying my rant, using binary where positions in the code have different values we need to know the ordering - in fact it's vital. Permutations vs. combinations. Also I'd query (as I've hinted above) the value of describing a simple on/off indication for several positions as being n-bit binary. It feels wrong to me ... sorry can't describe it better ... post-lunch lethargy.

      pbhj

    4. Re:Analysis by AlecC · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Each separate knot has six variables with two possible values (I gave three from memory, there are three more) and one with 24 values - colour. Therefore each knot represents a kind of "super byte" which can hold a single value from 0 to 1535. The data is not in the string but in the joins between strings. From a base string, there are multiple strings, with each not having 1536 possible values. From each string, substrings, sub-sub-strings and sub-sub-sub strings may be appended. Each append operation adds another "superbyte". The number of strings is indetermiante, because, as the article says, effectively the data spreads out in 3-space.

      Of course, I don't reckon they used it to maximum density, and the use of the bits may well have been representational. But it might be that it in facts encodes a chapter/paragraph/sentence/word structure. Simple sentences ("Fred owes Bill 5 goats") would be base plus one level of attached strings - a fairly simple level of encoding, with a super-byte at each knot. But it would not be diffcult to generalise from this onec it became common. In fact, this would tend to happen automatically if Bill tied all his IOUs onto one "backing string": from spine, substring identifies debtors, sub-substrings identify multiple debts.

      --
      Consciousness is an illusion caused by an excess of self consciousness.
    5. Re:Analysis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
      24 discrete colors = 24 additional bits, so it's NOT a 7bit binary system, its a 31bit system.
      Unless the Incas painted each knot more than one colour, no, 24 discrete colors != 24 additional bits.

      Think about it -- unless a single knot can be painted all twenty-four colours at once, there's no way you can turn all twenty-four bits "on". It's much more likely, given the limitations of painting on tiny knots, that a knot would be one and one color only, and that the article's math is thus correct
    6. Re:Analysis by jafiwam · · Score: 1

      "nobody is ever going to need more than 24 colors"

      Seriously though, I think it is much more likely that the knots and colors represent larger concepts, like "llama" or "worker" rather than simply making combinations. (There are better ways to make combinations of bits if that is the point...)

      I think there is some artistic intepretation of the knot sets that caused these things to be meaningful to their users; its not a bit-mapping to meaning system.

    7. Re:Analysis by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
      Far less sophisticated than binary.
      What's that supposed to mean? If by sophisticated you mean capable of encoding complex information, binary can only do that by means of external coventions, whether that be the .png file format, the Edifact standard, or ASCII.
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  23. Re:7 bits? - read the article ! it was emacs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    for a short info:
    it was seven binary choices the maker could make,
    like type of cord, spin direction, etc, times 24 colours, which equals a 2^6*24, similar in construction to common IEEE float data type.
    you have 7 digits for the information, and a not fully used 5 digit binary for selection of "ctrl-shift-meta-alt-cokebottle" modifiers.

    basically: incas invented the earlies EMACS :-)

  24. So where is Jennifer Garner in all this? by CrazyWingman · · Score: 1

    Sounds like a bad Alias episode to me. "Rambaldi" must have been Incan, I guess.
    ...although, if Jennifer Garner did the report about this developing news, I might be even more inclined to watch! :)

    good thing 47 can be represented with 7 binary digits

  25. So instead of"one" and "zero"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... it should be "naught" and "knot"?

    1. Re:So instead of"one" and "zero"... by passion · · Score: 1

      Ahh, but depending on where you come from, it may be difficult to hear the difference...

      --
      - passion
    2. Re:So instead of"one" and "zero"... by mattACK · · Score: 1
      Who's there?
      <ducks>
      --


      "My God, this must be a truly remarkable corn chip, to be so widely and confidently touted."
  26. de-evolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How'd they go from binary to leaf blowers?

  27. prior art? by the+uNF+cola · · Score: 2, Funny

    Heh, let's see someone patent binary now. This must be the the most prior-art, that prior art can get...

    --

    --
    "I'm not bright. Big words confuse me. But Wanda loves me and that should be enough for you." - Cosmo

  28. Braille by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Umm... isn't braille a Three Dimensional Written Language?

    1. Re:Braille by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > isn't braille a Three Dimensional Written Language

      Well, it is in 3-Ds, but isn't written in 3-d. The same arrangement of bumps in Braille will not translate differently if the height of those bumps changes (AFAIK).

    2. Re:Braille by zodar · · Score: 1

      Braille is more of a 3d language than the knotted strings language is. Knotted strings are a one-dimensional language rendered in 3d. Neither the length, width, or depth of a knot matters.

  29. Re:Why 7 by joshtimmons · · Score: 2, Interesting


    Why would you understand 10 or 5? They're pretty arbitrary (other than being the number of fingers on a hand).



    They were probably encoding other symbols and they had between (2^5) 32 and (2^6) 64. So, 7 was the logical choice. If we wanted to encode the letters (A-Z), the numbers (0-9), and some basic punctuation (.,-;) we'd need exactly 7 bits too.


  30. So Lemme Get this straight by Evets · · Score: 5, Funny

    We use binary code to be able to display strings in 24 bit color and they use strings in 24 colors to display binary code. The circle is complete.

    1. Re:So Lemme Get this straight by Evets · · Score: 0

      There are 10 kinds of people in this world. Those who think in Incan and those who don't. (I'm obviously amusing myself today)

  31. Re:5, 7, and 10 by Glamdrlng · · Score: 5, Funny

    5 and 10 are natural numbers because we have ten fingers, ten toes, etc. I see two possibilities: 1. The guy who invented this numbering system lost three fingers during an accident involving a rope, a pully, and a large block of sun-dried mud-brick. 2. The aliens who taught it to the Incas had seven fingers.

    --

    Yes, my only tool is a hammer. And you're starting to look like a nail.
  32. Phew.... The incas had 1's and 0's?????? by javiercero · · Score: 4, Funny

    Nah, When I was growing up, we only had 0's... them Incas had it so easy.... That's right we only had unary, and we did not complain. Oh, and we had to walk uphill through the rain forrest in the snow to reach the pyramid, and it was uphill both ways... and we had no shoes.

    There, them Incas what a bunch of pussies!!!!

    1. Re:Phew.... The incas had 1's and 0's?????? by Rand+Race · · Score: 1

      You had zeros!? We had to use the letter "o"....

      --
      Insanity is the last line of defence for the master diplomat. But you have to lay the groundwork early.
  33. no not first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's a tribe in new guinea that used a form a of binary, cant remmeber details .. google.

  34. Story mirror - site slashdotted :( by (TK14)Dessimat0r · · Score: 4, Informative

    Inca may have used knot computer code to bind empire
    By Steve Connor, Science Editor
    23 June 2003

    They ran the biggest empire of their age, with a vast network of roads, granaries, warehouses and a complex system of government. Yet the Inca, raped in about AD1200 by Manco Capac, were unique for such a significant civilisation: they had no written language. This has been the conventional view of the Inca, whose dominions at their height covered almost all of the Andean region, from Colombia to Chile, until they were defeated in the Spanish conquest of 1532.

    But a leading scholar of South American antiquity believes the Inca did have a form of non-verbal communication written in an encoded language similar to the binary code of today's computers. Gary Urton, professor of anthropology at Harvard University, has re-analysed the complicated knotted strings of the Inca - decorative objects called khipu - and found they contain a seven-bit binary code capable of conveying more than 1,500 separate units of information.

    In the search for definitive proof of his discovery, which will be detailed in a book, Professor Urton believes he is close to finding the "Rosetta stone" of South America, a khipu story that was translated into Spanish more than 400 years ago.

    "We need something like a Rosetta khipu and I'm optimistic that we will find one," said Professor Urton, referring to the basalt slab found at Rosetta, near Alexandria in Egypt, which allowed scholars to decipher a text written in Egyptian hieroglyphics from its demotic and Greek translations.

    It has long been acknowledged that the khipu of the Inca were more than just decorative. In the 1920s, historians demonstrated that the knots on the strings of some khipu were arranged in such a way that they were a store of calculations, a textile version of an abacus.

    Khipu can be immensely elaborate, composed of a main or primary cord to which are attached several pendant strings. Each pendant can have secondary or subsidiary strings which may in turn carry further subsidiary or tertiary strings, arranged like the branches of a tree. Khipu can be made of cotton or wool, cross-weaved or spun into strings. Different knots tied at various points along the strings give the khipu their distinctive appearance.

    Professor Urton's study found there are, theoretically, seven points in the making of a khipu where the maker could make a simple choice between two possibilities, a seven-bit binary code. For instance, he or she could choose between weaving a string made of cotton or of wool, or they could weave in a "spin" or "ply" direction, or hang the pendant from the front of the primary string or from the back. In a strict seven-bit code this would give 128 permutations (two to the power of seven) but Professor Urton said because there were 24 possible colours that could be used in khipu construction, the actual permutations are 1,536 (or two to the power of six, multiplied by 24).

    This could mean the code used by the makers allowed them to convey some 1,536 separate units of information, comparable to the estimated 1,000 to 1,500 Sumerian cuneiform signs, and double the number of signs in the hieroglyphs of the ancient Egyptians and the Maya of Central America.

    If Professor Urton is right, it means the Inca not only invented a form of binary code more than 500 years before the invention of the computer, but they used it as part of the only three-dimensional written language. "They could have used it to represent a lot of information," he says. "Each element could have been a name, an identity or an activity as part of telling a story or a myth. It had considerable flexibility. I think a skilled khipu-keeper would have recognised the language. They would have looked and felt and used their store of knowledge in much the way we do when reading words."

    There is also some anecdotal evidence that khipu were more than mere knots on a string used for storing calculations. The Spanish recorded capturing one Inca n

    1. Re:Story mirror - site slashdotted :( by Tomun · · Score: 2, Funny

      The original hieroglyphs, dating from about 5,000 years ago, were etched on stone and were elaborate and time-consuming to fuck,

      Painful too I'd imagine.

    2. Re:Story mirror - site slashdotted :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      You know one thing I always wondered about posts like this is how the guy knew the site was about to be slashdotted and so just-in-the-nick-of-time copied the content and posted it.

      Or do these people make copies of every page mentioned in a slashdot story and then set up some system to check the original URL every few minutes and post the story if the site is down?

      Or wait a minute... yes, the link works. The site is not slashdotted. Just as I suspected all along. You, sir, are a dedicated karma whore.

    3. Re:Story mirror - site slashdotted :( by scrytch · · Score: 1

      Did anyone actually read this story before moderating it up? Read every word nice and carefully. A statement on CIPA I guess...

      --
      I've finally had it: until slashdot gets article moderation, I am not coming back.
  35. SCO sues Gary Urton, Harvard University by McCall · · Score: 5, Funny

    In other news, SCO is suing Harvard University for $1 Billion, for patent infringement.

    A spokesperson for SCO said "One of the khipu contains binary representation of UNIX code, we can't tell you which khipu it is, but anyone who has read, heard or mentioned the Inca civilisation owes us money, and we will be seeking damages."

    A spokesperson for the Inca civilisation was unable to comment due to being mummified.

  36. The Incas did not have DN3, but... by Prince_Ali · · Score: 5, Funny

    The Mayan calendar is counting down to the release of Duke Nukem Forever!

    1. Re:The Incas did not have DN3, but... by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      December 23rd 2012?

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    2. Re:The Incas did not have DN3, but... by kzg · · Score: 1

      December 23, 2012 AD !

    3. Re:The Incas did not have DN3, but... by Molt · · Score: 1

      They were perhaps overly optimistic in their estimation.

      --
      404 Not Found: No such file or resource as '.sig'
  37. Seems to be quite common by jmaatta · · Score: 2, Informative

    Ancient cultures in China and Africa also used binary, mostly for predicting the future.

  38. Database structures by panurge · · Score: 1, Funny
    Strings hanging off strings hanging off strings? Surely a relational database? It's just as well Codd died before learning that the Incas beat him to 3NF by 500 years.

    Now, can I interest the client for the db I'm working on in having it converted to Quipu? Should be good for a few trips to South America...

    --
    Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
    1. Re:Database structures by mysticgoat · · Score: 1

      Strings hanging off strings hanging off strings? Surely a relational database? It's just as well Codd died before learning that the Incas beat him to 3NF by 500 years.

      I'm sure Codd would have been appalled at Incan degree of stringification.

      (Sorry, I just couldn't resist.)

  39. Grannie's First Program by Jawju · · Score: 4, Funny

    I've got a god-awful knitted jumper from my gran which I swear is an attempt at the 'Hello World' program. If I get kitted up in everything she's ever gave me, I'd be a walking Beowulf cluster, and how long would it be before SCO pointed at my socks and filed a lawsuit?

    1. Re:Grannie's First Program by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Are they SOCKS4 or SOCKS5?

  40. Scourge of the Inca by Zapdos · · Score: 4, Funny

    and what eventually caused their fall was the khipu Century Copy-Knot Act.

  41. 7 bits by turgid · · Score: 4, Funny

    Don't you know that these guys cross-bred with the aliens! That's where they got 7 fingers from and hence 7-bit binary. The binary codes were calculations of landing and take-off trajectories for the flying-saucers. There's even one where they factor in the mass of Jesus as one of the passengers.

    1. Re:7 bits by mibus · · Score: 1

      7 bits? Maybe they just wanted to make sure they could talk to all 7-bit clean SMTP servers...

  42. Old news by de+la+mettrie · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is not new. It has been generally surmised that quipus (khipus, qipus) served as a carrier of complex informations. See e.g. this page for pictures and info.

    According to the article, the quoted scientist merely says that the permutations possible in a quipu weaving might indicate a septary (not, by any means, a binary) code. He also says he's looking for a Rosetta stone equivalent.

    Well, do go on looking, old fellow. But I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for a whip-toting archaeologist-hero to stumble out of a collapsing jungle temple with a quipu-to-English dictionary under his arm. Remember, the Incas were one of the more institutionally stupid (and thus, extinct) civilizations in history - after independently inventing the wheel, they used it for children's toys exclusively.

    And he expects to unearth the original quipu RFC? It's probably in quipu, too. And eaten by a llama.

    1. Re:Old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why would they use the damn wheel on very short , irregular mountain roads, connected via unstable rope bridges?

    2. Re:Old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Remember, the Incas were one of the more institutionally stupid (and thus, extinct) civilizations in history - after independently inventing the wheel, they used it for children's toys exclusively.

      A cart will do you hardly any good in the Andes given the screwy terrain.

      Anyway, thank the Incas for chocolate (and coffee too i believe).

    3. Re:Old news by xutopia · · Score: 1

      Thank God we're not "institutionally stupid"!

      Thank God most of the inventions we create are used for the military otherwise we'd go extinct too!

      Anyways God Bless You!

    4. Re:Old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Remember, the Incas were one of the more
      > institutionally stupid (and thus, extinct)
      > civilizations in history - after independently
      > inventing the wheel, they used it for
      > children's toys exclusively.

      We pretty much built our civilization on the wheel and on combustion. Combustion powers our wheels which in turn cause the tracks of our tanks move forward and combustion hurls shells filled with explosives (more combustion here...) miles across the battlefield. In ten thousand years hence our magnificent worldwide civilization will have made it's way into the stories and legends of a few scattered and tattered survivors sitting by the fireside and their shamans will sing the song of the Great Gorgabusc and his wife Rumesfel and how they brought the sun to earth when they punished the evil Sausyraqirani for stealing the black water of life from the gods.

    5. Re:Old news by RevMike · · Score: 4, Insightful
      after independently inventing the wheel, they used it for children's toys exclusively.

      It is a pretty consistent observation that lots of cultures invented the wheel, but only those that had access to high quality draft animals used it. Remember that the horse and other draft animals (oxen, donkey, etc.) were extinct in the new world until (re)introduced by the Europeans in 1492.

      A great book on the subject is Guns, Germs, Steel: The Fate of Human Societies by Jared Diamond. Diamond argues that two dominant cultures have arisen - A Western culture that traces its roots to Fertile Crescent in modern day Iraq and the an Eastern culture that traces its roots to the Yellow River Valley. In both of these places nature and geography conspired to create a package of tools that allowed these cultures to spread.

      Both these places had the following...

      1. Naturally occuring staple foods - usually grains - that were easy to domesticate
      2. Large wild animals that were easy to domesticate and useful as draft animals
      3. Room to spread out while using the same tools
      In contrast, the natives of the Americas had only a single staple grain - corn - and that one took thousands of years longer than wheat, barley, oats, and rice to domesticate and they had no draft animals. As an added gotcha, when the American natives did manage to domesticate corn, there were barriers to spreading out. For instance, the people of Mexico - Aztec, Mayan, Toltec - would need to pack up and cross the American Southwestern deserts, then the great plains (which can't be farmed easily without steel plows), then the Appalachian mountains, before reaching readily farmable land in the Eastern USA. The Chinese and Middle Eastern peoples could spread all the way to Korea, India, North Africa, and Europe without hitting that much of a barrier.

    6. Re:Old news by nicotinix · · Score: 1

      "He also says he's looking for a Rosetta stone equivalent."

      Yes, but it's encrypted with IGP (Incan Good Privacy).

    7. Re:Old news by juanfe · · Score: 1

      Thank the Inkas for potatoes (not the Irish, mind you), for monstrously gigantic ears of purple corn, for understanding that llamas are better than wheels when you're dealing with steep cliffs.

      Whomever said that the Inkas believed the Spaniards were gods, "pay manan unanchainku paykuna umayux karqaku" -- he does not understand how intelligent the Inkas were.

      --
      ***Foucault is watching you..***
    8. Re:Old news by juanfe · · Score: 1

      Don't forget potatoes as a staple of the natives of the Americas. Sure, they're not grain, but they've been used as a high-carb source of starch and gluten for centuries.

      --
      ***Foucault is watching you..***
    9. Re:Old news by babbage · · Score: 1
      [....] As an added gotcha, when the American natives did manage to domesticate corn, there were barriers to spreading out. For instance, the people of Mexico - Aztec, Mayan, Toltec - would need to pack up and cross the American Southwestern deserts, then the great plains (which can't be farmed easily without steel plows), then the Appalachian mountains, before reaching readily farmable land in the Eastern USA. The Chinese and Middle Eastern peoples could spread all the way to Korea, India, North Africa, and Europe without hitting that much of a barrier.

      So Diamond doesn't feel that the Sahara Desert was a more significant barrier than that of the American Southwest, and that the puny little Appalachains were a stronger barrier than the mighty Himalayas? That seems like an iffy conclusion to me, but then I'm sure there's more to it than that -- the book has an excellent reputation, and I've been meaning to read it for a while now. Maybe I'll check it out from the library...

    10. Re:Old news by babbage · · Score: 1

      Heh, +1 Prophetic :-)

    11. Re:Old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Potatoes are particularly low in protein, compared to pulses (beans, lentils, chick-peas) grown and domesticated by the people of the Fertile Crescent.

      At 2% protein (vs 15-20%), they make a poor basis for a diet.

      Just look at the Irish if you don't believe me!

    12. Re:Old news by misterpies · · Score: 1


      I think you'll find that sub-Saharan Africa was more or less unexposed to either European or Middle-Eastern culture (excluding a narrow coastal strip along the east coast) until the Portuguese and Spanish tried sailing south.

      As for India, if you're coming from the west (i.e. Iran, Pakistan) there's no need to cross the Himalayas. One of the shorter roots passes over the flattish coastal plains.

      In either case, it should be pointed out that both sub-Saharan africa and southern india developed their own advanced civilisations independently. Unfortunately for the Africans, their societies were pretty much destroyed by the advent of large-scale slave trading (by Europeans, Americans and Arabs). As for south india, the indigenous Dravidian culture there is still very distinct from the Hindi culture of the north.

      --
      The author of this post asserts his moral rights.
    13. Re:Old news by awol · · Score: 1

      "after independently inventing the wheel, they used it for children's toys exclusively"

      Indeed. I also love the idea that the ancient greeks had a childrens toy (or at least a novelty) that was essentially a steam engine. If we have gone from feudal agrarian society to the moon since we "discovered" the steam engine, imagine how far we will have gone in an extra 2 thousand years (yeah yeah, smart alecs, extinct, I know, very funny) and imagine if it had been the ancient greeks who were doing the going. Remarkable.

      --
      "The first thing to do when you find yourself in a hole is stop digging."
    14. Re:Old news by RevMike · · Score: 1
      it should be pointed out that both sub-Saharan africa and southern india developed their own advanced civilisations independently

      Diamond does discuss sun-Saharan Africa. He acknowledges the development of civilization there based on sorghum and the ass. He claims that this culture was less advanced because it had fewer less protein rich staple foods and less capable draft animals. It also had less room to spread, so it dominated sub-Saharan Africa but couldn't break out of the continent.

      The wheat/bean/horse/oxen culture of the fertile crescent had the geography to spread all the way into India and to Britain. Plus, having more protein, more animals, more area, this culture developed more. It still took thouasands of year before the fertile crescent people were able to enslave the sub-Sahran people.

      As for Dravidian, it seems to have developed in the Indus Valley, where civilization also developed independently. I don't have specific knowledge, but I would suspect that fertile crescent culture mixed with Indus culture when the Indo-Iranian (Persian, Hindi, etc.) speakers moved into India around 1700 BC.

      An important point to keep in this thread is that when we discuss culture in this context, we need to think about questions like "What did they grow? What animals did they use? What farming methods did they use?" I'm not sure if the Dravidian speakers of Southern India adopted the culture (by this limited measure) of the fertile crescent people while maintaining their own language. Perhaps the Indus Valley culture was had enough in common with the fertile crescent culture to make this an easy transition.

    15. Re:Old news by bj8rn · · Score: 1
      I think you'll find that sub-Saharan Africa was more or less unexposed to either European or Middle-Eastern culture (excluding a narrow coastal strip along the east coast) until the Portuguese and Spanish tried sailing south.

      There was more exposure to Middle-Eastern culture in Africa than "a narrow coastal strip along the east coast". The Great Zimbabwe empire, quite far from the coast, traded with the Arabs on the east coast. Ethiopia (I wouldn't call it a narrow strip, either) had contacts with Egypt, they still have their own version of the Christian faith. Islam reached Western Africa in the 10th century AD when the kingdom of Ghana extended itself to Sahara. Timbuktu, one of the biggest cities in the region, was both a trade and a cultural centre. Quite a number of legends about how cruel some or other African nation was, were made up by Arab traders to scare Europeans.

      --
      Hell is not other people; it is yourself. - Ludwig Wittgenstein
    16. Re:Old news by mysticgoat · · Score: 1

      Why would they use the damn wheel on very short , irregular mountain roads, connected via unstable rope bridges?

      Agreed! This should be modded up!

      I really get irked by these comments about other civilizations not having the wheel, as if this is some kind of milestone on a time line. You know them Incans didn't have snowshoes even-- so they were even less advanced than Europeans of 10,000 years ago, huh?

    17. Re:Old news by Arslan+ibn+Da'ud · · Score: 1
      No, thank the Incas for
      • potatoes
      • pineapple
      • pumpkins
      • lima beans
      OK, you can hold off thanking 'em for lima beans :)

      You can also thank them for 'inventing' beef jerky. The word 'jerky' actually derives from Quechua 'dzherkhkie'. They would cut their game meat into slabs or sticks, and hang them on mountaintops until they freeze-dried. Useful preservation method, as any camper or hiker will attest.

      It's the Aztecs who gave us chocolate (as well as vanilla.) And coffee was first grown in Ethiopia, for that matter...

      As for the wheel, both the Incas and Aztecs had the wheel but both saw little use for it. The Incas' terrain was far too mountainous for wheels. And the Aztecs had no draft animals, so they never saw a wheel as useful. See Cecil Adams's column for the lowdown on the wheel...it's useful, but not all-important to ancient civilizations.

      --

      Practice Kind Randomness and Beautiful Acts of Nonsense.

    18. Re:Old news by scrytch · · Score: 1

      > Anyway, thank the Incas for chocolate

      Aztecs

      > (and coffee too i believe).

      Arabs (or Turks)

      --
      I've finally had it: until slashdot gets article moderation, I am not coming back.
    19. Re:Old news by thinduke · · Score: 1
      Well, do go on looking, old fellow. But I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for a whip-toting archaeologist-hero to stumble out of a collapsing jungle temple with a quipu-to-English dictionary under his arm.


      Besides the Rosetta stone, it happened also with cuneiform script, which was deciphered in 1839 thanks to an inscription on a cliff in Bistun, Iran; a pretty large inscription, by the way, not something Indiana would have to fight nazis and snakes to obtain. The inscriptions was written in Elamite, Akadian, and Old Persian; the real tour de force is, none of these languages were known (except Old Persian is somewhat vaguely related to nowadays Persian), but the fact that the text was written in 3 different languages allowed Rawlinson to locate common words, thus isolating proper nouns, and slowly beginning to translate the Old Persian text. Much more hard work gave the key to the complex Elamite and Akadian writings.

      So, it happened twice before, why not a third time?
    20. Re:Old news by Ugmo · · Score: 1

      According to the article, the quoted scientist merely says that the permutations possible in a quipu weaving might indicate a septary (not, by any means, a binary) code. He also says he's looking for a Rosetta stone equivalent.



      I am not sure this is septary or binary. The seven things refered to were 7 decision points. A decision point was something like: 1. Use wool, use cotton.2. Tie knot, don't.3.Branch to new string, don't. Each is a binary decision.



      And this is not just about math as some people seem to have written. If it was binary it could be just like ASCII (Pure ASCII is 7bit). Each of the decision points could correspond to a position of the digits in a binary representation of an ASCII character (I am not saying they used ASCII, this is just an example).



      In 7 bit ASCII we could label the positions as: (7654321). The bit at position 4 could be 0 or 1.
      If instead of a position we had decision points then item 4 could be that there was a branch there . No branch would be 0. A branch would be 1.



      You could just have one kind of decision point, knot, no knot, but you would have to have a standard length of string that must contain a knot. If I wished to send you a series of null characters I couldn't just send you a foot long string with no knots in it unless we both had rulers marked in inches and each binary digit was assigned to an inch of string, then I would know that the foot long string was 12 zeroes in a row.
      This would not be very space efficient and it would be hard to read by people.



      The Inca system probably evolved slowly and was added to piece by piece. It was not designed by Claude Shannon. They might have been able to simplify it to 1 or two changing symbols corresponding to 1's and 0's but I could believe it was a binary system still.



      So knot,red wool branch, knot, blue cotton branch, knot, knot would mean one letter. More likely it is one symbol. The Mayan were using symbols, as were the Egyptians and Sumerians and Chinese. Most first time writing systems used symbols.(I would say pictograms but a bunch of knotted strings aren't really pictograms)



      In Cunieform writing you could have a picture of a fish. The fish could mean "fish". If it had a little star next to it it could mean something to do with the gods, so it wasn't a fish anymore it was "the god of the fishes" or maybe "the god of the sea". Or it could be the "fi" sound from "fish" like in "philip". You could have a message saying that "Philip offered 5 fish as a sacrafice to the god of the sea". It would be full of fishes.



      The Inca could have a standard pattern of knots, branches, colors, textile types that meant "potato" (or if you are Dan Quayle "potatoe").



      Maybe you take that pattern and add a short royal blue cord to it and it becomes "the king's potato".



      Or there could be a standard pattern that means "Phillip", tie on potato, tie on a certain string that means "everything on this string is a number" with 5 knots in it and this means "Phillip has 5 potatoes". Branch off the potato or number string with a symbol that means "metric ton" or "basket" and it would mean "Phillip has 5 metric tons of potatoes".



      That would work for your tax records.



      Stories would come later as they added symbols for verbs and adjectives.



      I think the 7 decision points are more like the strokes a pen can make in Chineses Caligraphy. The strokes do not mean anything. The combinations in certain strokes makes a symbol that means something. Neither system is binary. The binary analysis would just give you an idea of how much information the system could possibly hold. To say the Inca used binary is misleading.



    21. Re:Old news by 73939133 · · Score: 1

      Remember, the Incas were one of the more institutionally stupid (and thus, extinct) civilizations in history - after independently inventing the wheel, they used it for children's toys exclusively.

      And our epiatph will be: "The Americans were one of the more institutionally stupid (and thus, extinct) civilizations in history - after independently inventing the internal combustion engine, petrochemical industries, plastics, and nuclear power, they actually used them for widespread mass transportation and production of goods, thus sealing their own doom and endangering the health of the whole planet."

      Whether our civilization will last even as long as that of the Incas, let alone some of the long-lived historical civilizations is still a completely open book. But restraint in which technologies we actually use in practice may well be necessary if we don't want to go extinct really soon.

    22. Re:Old news by Tsu+Dho+Nimh · · Score: 1
      To make effective use of wheels, you also need flat land for the roads, or some astounding engineering effort to get the grade of a mountainous pass down to something a wheeled vehicle can handle.

      A llama is sure footed and can go up and down steep steps, something wheels don't do. The Incan engineering effort (and skill) in getting the llama paths installed, with rope bridges across the chasms, is mind-boggling. It's like hundreds of miles of Bright Angel Trail ... with stone steps.

    23. Re:Old news by juanfe · · Score: 1

      Ah, but you see, they had fava beans, fish, nuts, alpacas... and well, if the potato is a bad staple, then the scientists at the Inernational Potato Center in Lima have been wasting their time for the last 30-odd years.

      --
      ***Foucault is watching you..***
  43. ANSI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    They have invented to low ASCII code (7 bits) and color coded them ? Wow these guys had an ANSI terminal 500 years ago !

  44. That's all well and good, by Vengeance · · Score: 0, Funny

    But it took the ancient Italians to invent spaghetti code!

    --
    It was a joke! When you give me that look it was a joke.
  45. Without a stop bit? by Epeeist · · Score: 1

    Seven bits hey? They were obviously writing in ASCII and not a Unicode character set.

  46. Prior art? by CausticPuppy · · Score: 1, Funny

    Does this count as prior art? Somebody better tell microsoft...

    --
    -CausticPuppy "Of all the people I know, you're certainly one of them." -Somebody I don't know
  47. Re:7 bits? - read the article ! it was emacs. by spiny · · Score: 1

    nah, sounds more like Vi to me ....

    --

    Fry: heh, Yakov Smirnoff said it
    Leela: No he didn't.
  48. Knots in strings are not the same thing... by Roblem · · Score: 4, Insightful

    First off I wouldnâ(TM)t really consider binary an âoeinventedâ numerical system. I would only consider the roman system wacky enough to be invented. Also we are talking about labeling things with knots in strings right? Or did they work out rules for binary math? Of course they did have a nice data compression algorithm what with 7 bit binary encoding 1536 items. Of course if you read the article you find none of this is true. They used colored strings with knots in them to label things. Big deal! Knots in strings are not the same thing as a math system nor should they be compared one to one with Egyptian hieroglyphics.

    1. Re:Knots in strings are not the same thing... by Jagasian · · Score: 1

      So something has to be wacky to be invented? If a formal binary system wasn't invented, then where did it come from? Are there people that still believe in the Platonic Ideal Realm of Forms? I mean, using religion as a foundation for mathematics is kind of hypocritical, don't you think?

    2. Re:Knots in strings are not the same thing... by wiredlogic · · Score: 1

      All of mathematics is an invention. The symbols used in mathematics are tools to help us keep track of abstract, often complex, concepts. Numbers are symbolic representations of quantity. They don't exist in the real world. I could have a basket of 42 apples that exist, but the number "42" is not a real thing. It is a conceptual representation of the quantity of apples in the basket. It is merely a human invention.

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
  49. Not 1500 units of information by p3d0 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    After multiplying the different permutations of the knots, they reach the conclusion that there are 1536 possibilities, and then go on to state that "This could mean the code used by the makers allowed them to convey some 1,536 separate units of information".

    That is a poor interpretation. 1536 possibilities allows someone to encode 10.6 bits of information. To encode 1536 "separate units" of information, each unit must represent no more than 1/145th of a bit. That is a very, very small amount of information, equivalent to having someone tell you something you were already 99.5% sure was true, such as "wow, this poker hand is not a straight!" or "guess what, my birthday this year does not fall on Friday the 13th".

    It may be closer to the truth to say their knot language had 1536 different symbols, as compared with the 50-or-so letters, numbers, and punctuation marks we use in English.

    --
    Patrick Doyle
    I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
    1. Re:Not 1500 units of information by bj8rn · · Score: 1

      Correct me if I'm wrong, but in linguistics, a symbol is considered the smallest unit of information. 'a', for instance is a single symbol, but it does carry information.

      --
      Hell is not other people; it is yourself. - Ludwig Wittgenstein
    2. Re:Not 1500 units of information by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In further news: The ascii table, using only 7 locations conatining only 1's and 0's can be used to encode only .883 bits of information. (based on the same ratio with 128 possibilities)

    3. Re:Not 1500 units of information by p3d0 · · Score: 1

      It's just the difference between two different meanings of the word "symbol". Yes, 'a' is a symbol, so there are 26 different letter symbols. But supposing I have some device that can represent 26 distinct states, it would be incorrect to say it can "convey 26 separate units of information". It can only convey the choice of one symbol chosen from 26, so it's only conveying one unit of information. (That unit happens to be 4.7 bits, assuming the symbols are equally likely.)

      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
    4. Re:Not 1500 units of information by p3d0 · · Score: 1
      The ascii table doesn't "encode" any information. It's a mapping from various symbols to integers. It would be misleading to say that each symbol "conveys 128 separate units of information".

      Maybe it conveys one unit of information, or seven units of information (if your unit is a bit), but conveying 128 units of information in one ascii character would require very redundant input data.

      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
    5. Re:Not 1500 units of information by p3d0 · · Score: 1

      Why would you use the same ratio? That's meaningless. The right formula is that the number of bits is log2(N) where N is the number of encodings, assuming the encodings are equally likely. log2(1536) = 10.6, and log2(128) = 7.

      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
    6. Re:Not 1500 units of information by t-10056 · · Score: 1

      Btw, If it's seven binary choices and 24 choices for colors, it should be (2^7)*24 = 3072, NOT (2^6)*24

  50. "before computers"? by freeweed · · Score: 3, Informative

    the Incas may have used a form of binary code 500 years before computers were invented

    I don't get it. George Bool basically wrote the laws of binary arithmetic (hence its name, boolean) way before computers were invented, too.

    Having binary arithmetic was essential in the invention of the digital computer - doesn't anyone go to school anymore?

    (Not to downplay an interesting accomplishment by the Inca if it is true, but using the invention of computers as your compare date makes little sense.)

    --
    Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    1. Re:"before computers"? by bj8rn · · Score: 4, Interesting
      using the invention of computers as your compare date makes little sense

      Makes just as much sense as comparing all dates to the birthday of one Jesus, son of Joseph the carpenter. It's just an arbitrary point in time that is supposed to demonstrate something. Relating the time to George Boole's accomplishment would have been more informative, that's true, but I don't think most of the people even know who Boole was, not to mention when he lived (I don't know when he lived. 19th century?). Hell, not too many people know when the first electronic computers were built, either, but they have more clue about it than Boole.

      --
      Hell is not other people; it is yourself. - Ludwig Wittgenstein
    2. Re:"before computers"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know how much of a huge accomplishment Boole's work was... I mean, seriously, if we look at binary as elements of the finite field of order 2, AND is just multiplication, XOR is just addition, and OR is simply (a + b) + ab. Nothing spectacular or magic there.

    3. Re:"before computers"? by freeweed · · Score: 1

      Relating the time to George Boole's accomplishment would have been more informative, that's true, but I don't think most of the people even know who Boole was, not to mention when he lived (I don't know when he lived. 19th century?)

      More informative? How about being informative at all?

      Most people don't know the connection between a binary number system and electronic digital computers. Most people don't know when the first electronic computers were invented. That didn't stop the news article from using them as a comparison.

      Trying to sound smart by saying 'hey, let's compare this to something people understand', then picking something at random as your comparison point, looks pretty idiotic.

      How about this: 'the Incas may have used a form of binary code 400 years before binary arithmetic (the language all computers use) was even discovered'. You're at least saying something meaningful.

      Oh, and until western (or other) society starts using a calendar based on A.C. (after computer), you may want to rethink your opening line. Unless I missed the past 2000 years of human history.

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
  51. Incas used base 10 by UCRowerG · · Score: 4, Interesting
    According to this website (thank you, Google), Incas used a base 10 system for numbering, while all their neighbors used base 60. If this is true, I would venture to say that the 7-bit quipu system was just large enough for their other records, same as the original 7-bit ASCII was for the standard western alphabet.

    I also found more detailed information on quipus, if anyone is interested.

    1. Re:Incas used base 10 by pohl · · Score: 1

      That's an interesting possibility. My first thought was that maybe the technique for manipulating the knotted string in one's hands required three fingers (thum, index, middle on one hand?) leaving the remainder for state management.

      --

      The "cue the foo posts in 3, 2, 1..." posts will commence with no subsequent foo posts in 3, 2, 1...

    2. Re:Incas used base 10 by 73939133 · · Score: 1

      same as the original 7-bit ASCII was for the standard western alphabet

      If you define American English as "the standard western alphabet". I think there are many westerners who would disagree...

  52. Quazikotel & The End Of The World + compurope by adzoox · · Score: 1, Interesting
    Not sure I spelled the name of their God right, but images of Quazikotel wrapped in a cylinder and in circles with dates are in the Smithsonian that are calendars. These calendars are much more accuarate than the even the modern Gregorian or the Hebrew Calendars. It shows "higher math" knowledge than maybe even Pythagorus or later people like Newton just as this "computer rope" does.

    The only caveat to this calendar is that it ends in the year 2012. So far every celestial event, if the demise of the Inca empire was predicted accuartely. (Down to Hale Bopp, Halley's comet, moon and sun eclipses, civilzations, etc etc)

    What's interesting about the calendar ending in 2012 is that this is a generally accepted year for The AntiChrist to appear by Bibilical eschatologists. It is also generally the year that is predicted by the Hebrew calendars for the Messiah (the true year 2000 to them I believe) - someone correct my factoids if I'm wrong.

    --
    Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
  53. Coffee by Outland+Traveller · · Score: 1

    I thought that coffee was discovered in the area of what is now Ethiopia.

  54. Re:5, 7, and 10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    10 is actually *not* a natural base to work with - it's quite unfriendly to working in small fractions (try adding one half + one third on your ten fingers). More natural bases to use if you're a culture seriously working out math for the first time are 12 (evenly divisible by 2,3,4) or 60 (divisible by 2,3,4,5). [pssst - look at a clock]. Nobody who had to do calculations for a living would have picked base 10 - I'm sure it was a management decision.

  55. I he is right by banana+fiend · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I saw a program where another professor (I find this a bit confusing - professor in America is a lecturer right? In Ireland Professor is reeeeaaaallll high up the food chain), tried to prove that the Incas used giant mirrors to create temperatures high enough to melt rock and create the perfect fitting buildings they have

    He failed to ignite a small stick, and sounded utterly unconvincing .... and mad.

    While I know the babylonians had batteries and the Incas were well and truly advanced, there are nutters proposing all sorts of things. It probably IS a code - but perhaps one like the hanky code (only example I could think of sorry), where the colors signified entire concepts rather than some sort of grammar.

    In summation: this guy could oh so easily be a wacko

    --
    Johns: Well, how does it look now? Riddick: Looks clear.
    1. Re:I he is right by toivotuo · · Score: 1

      Well, I'll just have to put a good word for Prof. Urton here. I most definetely wouldn't consider him a "wacko" (though I admit to being a khipu nut so my objectivity may well be questioned). He has worked on deciphering the khipu quite persistently for a couple of decades now from anthropological, archeological and ethno-mathematical angles.

      Check out this article in the Harvard Gazette.

  56. Lovely! by SComps · · Score: 1

    Does this mean SCO has to drop it's suit against IBM and the rest of us have to play retroactive licensing fees to an ancient civilization or it's heirs?

    Patent#1-Method for keeping track of beads with the additional side benefit of confusing the hell out of some pinprick scholar thousands of years from now.

  57. Khipu Processors by hashwolf · · Score: 2, Funny

    It interesting to note that the khipu is only the medium for storing the data.

    It would be even more interesting if a 'khipu processor' was found. By khipu processor I mean something you feed the knots to, to get work done.

    Of course it might be argued that lamas can still up to this day 'process' kiphus and get work done, but that's not exactly what I mean.

    Also if such a thing existed it's speed would be measured in knots per second, Mega knots per second, Giga knots per second, BogoKnots?
    What about a knot co processor or multi knot threading?

    Maybe knot, but what do I know?

    --
    - "They misunderestimated me."
  58. I agree too by dnoyeb · · Score: 4, Funny

    The funny thing I always see is movies about prehistoric man.

    They always show them sloutched over, dirty as hell, grunting like idiots. Basically while they claim this prehistoric man was the smartest animal on the planet, they show him as the dumbest. every other animal I know washes his ass. You can NOT be making a spear and still can't wash your ass.

    1. Re:I agree too by tsa · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Same thing with the Living with Dinosaurs thing (or what's it called):
      The mighty T-rex goes hunting. It walks trough the forest until it spots a flock of small fast-running animals. It opens its mouth, raises its head and ROAARRRSSS!!!! its lungs out, before jumping between the edible animals.
      No wonder T-rex was often a scavenger.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    2. Re:I agree too by sharkey · · Score: 4, Funny
      They always show them sloutched over, dirty as hell, grunting like idiots.

      Wrong channel. That's Ron Jeremy.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  59. There are 10 types of NativeAmerican civilizations by positive · · Score: 1, Funny

    Those that understand binary, and those that don't.

  60. What Time Zone is God in Anyway? by FreeUser · · Score: 2, Funny

    "According to occult scientist Terence McKenna, the end of the world as we know it will occur at 11:10 PM, December 22, 2012"

    Is that Eastern, Central, Mountain, or Pacific Time?

    Or is God in another timezone altogether ... like Greenwich or MET? ...and how many people, in and out of the White House, will work full time trying to make the apocolypse happen on schedule? Prophecies, despite being nonsensical, have a way of becoming self-fullfilling once enough gullable people buy into them, and enough of those gullible people ascend to positions of power where they can actually make it happen (with or without their brother in Florida helping out).

    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
    1. Re:What Time Zone is God in Anyway? by Surak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, rememeber it isn't my theory, it's Terence McKenna's. McKenna was an occultist who died in 2000. As an occultist myself, I find his work to be quite fascinating. Remember that everything you read in the occult field you have to take with a large grain of salt and then pick and choose what you believe for yourself -- even if it's nothing. That's something anyone who's studied the occult for any length of time will automatically tell you when you're just getting started.

    2. Re:What Time Zone is God in Anyway? by vorpal22 · · Score: 1

      I don't think this really has anything to do with god, and indeed, I'm quite sure that McKenna didn't believe in god in the traditional Christian sense (so no, he didn't mean that this would be the "second coming" of Jesus or anything else like that).

      As I understood it, we currently don't know how this end of things will come. Apparently, there's supposed to be a dramatic rise in creativity as the date draws near. For the actual event that will cause the end of humanity, no one knows, but it is speculated to be a number of things: death by a large asteroid, evolution to a new form of existence, etc...

    3. Re:What Time Zone is God in Anyway? by datawar · · Score: 1

      Remember that everything you read in the occult field you have to take with a large grain of salt

      Or, in McKenna's case, smoked with a large grain of DMT :-)

    4. Re:What Time Zone is God in Anyway? by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > we currently don't know how this end of things will come

      Luckily we can have a pre-warning if it is actually armageddon. I heard (somewhere) that there will be 7 years (there's that damned 7 again) of peace beforehand. So if a Palestinian state appears around December of 2005, we got problems.

    5. Re:What Time Zone is God in Anyway? by BigBadBri · · Score: 1
      Any fule nose that God is an Englishman, and would only ever use GMT.

      --
      oh brave new world, that has such people in it!
    6. Re:What Time Zone is God in Anyway? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Any fule nose that God is an Englishman, and would only ever use GMT.
      Indeed.
      "God is an Englishman through and through,
      and in all probability Anglican too"
  61. 7-bits, not so strange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I think that's quite fascinating. I believe the Book of Mormon, and since they would be descendants of the Book of Mormon peoples, that would mean that they inherit much knowledge from the ancient Israelites and Jews. Consequently, 7 would start to gain more credence having to do with perfection. Hmm, hmm, hmm. Thought provoking. Perhaps we should take some looks further back to see where this may have come from or how they derived this system. Perhaps we are overlooking some things from the Mayans or those before.

    1. Re:7-bits, not so strange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting. Not funny.

  62. No wheel, though by mc6809e · · Score: 1


    It seems a strange thing that such a culture
    lacked the wheel. In fact, the wheel was unknown to all the Americas before the arrival of the Europeans.

    It's amazing they got so far without it.

    1. Re:No wheel, though by xutopia · · Score: 2, Insightful

      in that link you send us there is the reason why they didn't use the wheel. Did you see the mountains? Did you see the slopes? To them a wheel wouldn't have had much to offer.

    2. Re:No wheel, though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Methinks you forget the many other ways that a wheel can be helpful: gears, water wheel etc.

      Of course I bet cheap labour and no concept of human rights had more to do with those not developing. Labour saving through mechanisation doesn't make sense in a slave economy.

    3. Re:No wheel, though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is not true.

      Although I cannot find an appropiate web link to document my answer, I assure you at least one prehispanic culture discovered the wheel and is exhibited at the National Museum of Antropology and History in Mexico City, Mexico.

      Q: Evidence?

      A: A small jaguar figurine with wheels on each paw. It was a toy found in Mexico.

      Q: Why didn't these people use wheels for something else other than toys?

      A: Because they didn't have appropiate animals which could provide traction force.

      Q: Horses you say?

      A: They were introduced by the spaniard conquerors.

      Q: Llamas?

      A: Hmmm, while wheels can't do much in the scarped terrain the Incas lived in, but Llamas are quite appropiate for it.

      So while one culture in Mexico had the insight to invent the wheel, it didn't have the animals to provide enough traction force for them to become something more useful.

      At the same time, another culture in Peru had those animals but the wheel couldnÂt have done much for them due to terrain conditions.

      *deep sigh*

    4. Re:No wheel, though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slave economy? Yes there were slaves, but it was far from a slave economy.

      Most of the Imperial Incan roads and buildings were built through a form of 'tax' that required people to work for the Inca (the name of the king). In exchange, the Inca provided them with food and drink, and often elaborate feasts.

      The economy was more akin to feudal Europe than a slave economy, where the Inca also got a cut of your haul of potatoes, chiles and other crops.

  63. Imagine the potential! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SOME INCA SUE MICROSOFT!!!

  64. So how did the Europeans roll over them? by rosewood · · Score: 1

    I loved my Mexico History class. It was so informative on many levels. My profesor talked about this guy and his current research.

    1. Re:So how did the Europeans roll over them? by rosewood · · Score: 1

      Wth? I guess I hit tab :(

      Anyways, in class we talked a lot about how the Euros conquered. No, the natives (aztecs, incas) were not wiped out - they were assemilated (sp?). Go to Mexico today and you can see this clearly.

      Also, as the euros moved in they thought they had a pretty primitive culture on their hands. No wheel, no horses + plows, etc. Well, the euros had a very unique situation to view civilizations that had grown on the other side of the world. Instead they killed, and you know the rest of the story.

      I just find it amazing that these cultures were so advanced and yet never had the wheel. They just ... didn't need it. What other things today do we have that when we find out that our neighbor doesn't have, we have to wonder how do they live?

    2. Re:So how did the Europeans roll over them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Also, as the euros moved in they thought they had a pretty primitive culture on their hands. No wheel, no horses + plows, etc. Well, the euros had a very unique situation to view civilizations that had grown on the other side of the world. Instead they killed, and you know the rest of the story.

      Oh yes the aztecs were such a peaceful loving poeple. The aztecs settled in present day mexico by killing off all the previous tribes in the area or putting them into slavery. Then the surrounding tribes were conquered and high tribute was demanded of them so they could live like kings.

      Then the europeans came in and did the same thing to them they had done previously. Don't act like taking over land and killing the natives is a uniquely european thing.

  65. Prior Art! by 955301 · · Score: 1

    For everyone who was concerned with the risk that Microsoft would attempt to patent the 1 and 0, and that out pitiful system would accept it, there is now a prior art example.

    --
    You are checking your backups, aren't you?
  66. What if? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
    What if you're out of pigment #21?

    What if you're type-setting a book page, and you run out of E's? (Or 3's since they're reversed.)

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    1. Re:What if? by arth1 · · Score: 1
      What if you're type-setting a book page, and you run out of E's?


      Now that I can answer from experience. You print the page twice, with every other line on each print. (You can't do just the missing E's on the second run, because then you won't have enough points touching the paper.)



      If you run out of ink, on the other hand, you have a much more serious problem.



      Regards,

      --

      *Art

    2. Re:What if? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      People still use individual letters for type-setting? I thought the Big Boys used gizmos that cast pages to order or something funky. (My knowledge of printing stops at fannish Gestetner machines.)

      No matter what the method, if you're out of ink/toner, you're SOL. (I remember being disappointed that laser printers didn't actually burn the letters on to the page.)

      My apartment building always has interesting printing tech left out back by the dumpsters. Once there was an IBM line-printer. I was tempted, but it had an IBM "standard" connector, so I passed. I did pick up the Smith-Corona daisy-wheel typewriter because it has a semi-standard serial port on the back. 12cps and a spelling-checker, woo! (I'll probably dump^w donate it to my parents. Easier than trying to bring them up to speed on even a turn-key computer setup, and I hate tossing working equipment.)

      Getting back on topic, I wonder how an Inca "knot-printer" would work? The colours could work like an inkjet, but they'd have to go to a symbolic representation of knots eventually. Too bad we can't see what might have happened with them after a few thousand years -- if anything. I'm re-reading Guns, Germs and Steel by Jared Diamond. (Slowly, several pages at bed time knock me right out.)

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  67. Re:Quazikotel & The End Of The World + compuro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I suspect that alot of your "facts" are wrong.
    Just how does this calendar show "higher math"
    knowledge than Pythagorus or Newton? Just what
    is your criteria for making such a broad and
    lame statement?

  68. Re:Artificial Al Gore by HutchGeek · · Score: 2, Funny

    No no, SCO didnt invent Al Gore.... They cloned him from a bone found in an Inca excavation dig. That way they figure since they thereby "own" Al Gore - the newest Inca - they cricumnavigate the patent the Inca's filed 500 years ago on alternative information representation systems by using encoding technology.

  69. Binary was probably used long before the Incas! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    It's a fact that e.g. shepherds from the Caucasus mountains have used binary for counting sheep for a long long time, possibly as long as they have had sheep. And that would make the use of binary much older than the Inca civilization. They used, and still uses, binary as a way of counting sheep easily with the fingers. 10 bits, 1024 sheep. It's extremely easy to let your fingers count in binary, if you have something to rest your fingers on (try with the edge of a table). You can count without thinking, just letting the fingers run while you e.g. read a newspaper. I use that shepherd method myself sometimes. When you're done with the counting just read the value from the current finger setting (you're a hacker, you can do that, right?)
    TA

  70. In Soviet Inca... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...a binary system of colored knots uses YOU!!!

  71. ASCII? by Felinoid · · Score: 1

    Before we start this up again look elsewhere in the comments and you'll see a chat on 7 fingsrs, funny and realistic reasons for using 7 bit for binary incoding of text.

    Still it has me going hmmm. ASCII standard text uses 7 bit they use 7 bit... ASCII.
    Now to see if the had rope sites. Ohhh then we discover Slashdot means "News for anti-socal wizards. Knowladge of global importance"
    Look for the rope from annonomous coward saying "First rope".
    Jeff bates was the co mod and his name in that life was Hemos.
    Then the preveous incarnation of Bill Gates (Columbus) came in and thats the end.
    Of course crypto exporting wasn't an issue.

    --
    I don't actually exist.
  72. Re:Quazikotel & The End Of The World + compuro by KjetilK · · Score: 1

    The only caveat to this calendar is that it ends in the year 2012.

    Yeah, and the funny thing with our calendar is that it ends on Dec 31. Then it begins again. So, your point was?

    --
    Employee of Inrupt, Project Release Manager and Community Manager for Solid
  73. IFA and the ORISA by rigau · · Score: 1

    The Yoruba in Africa (where Santeria, Cantomble and Vodoo come from) have a very complex divination system based on 1 and 0. It has two lines and four yes or no per line. one sign looks something like this:

    +
    - 0
    - 0
    - 0
    0 -

  74. 3D written language by WeirdKid · · Score: 1

    "the only three-dimensional written language"

    Technically, Braille exists in three dimensions, but some may consider it simply analogous to raised type. What would make the difference would be to know if the third dimension is used as an additional descriptive element or just a conveyance mechanism. Does anyone know if bold or emphasized words have bigger bumps in Braille?

  75. I thought Algore invented binary. by Lobo_Louie · · Score: 1

    bleh

  76. I-Ching is a binary system by petong · · Score: 1

    The Chinese were using this way before the Incas. A quick Google search wil provide links.

  77. Only 3-dimensional written language by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about braille?

  78. Re:Why 7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "They're pretty arbitrary (other than being the number of fingers on a hand)."
    ---

    That's a rather significant arbitrary thing to base a numbering system on...

    That's like asking:
    "Why would a vacuum machine have a plug and a cord? That's pretty arbitrary (other than it using electricity from a wall socket).

  79. Any chance... by JudgeFurious · · Score: 1

    ...there's SCO code in here? I mean, they do call it "Ancient" UNIX code right?

    --
    Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
  80. Three-Dimensional Written Language? I don' tink so by KRL · · Score: 1

    Actually, if it's knots on a string that we are talking about... that's one dimensional, not three.

  81. Marginalizing astronomy ??? by adzoox · · Score: 1
    It takes a lot of "math knowledge" (geometry, trig, calc) to figure out an accuarate celestial calendar. Thanks for putting down and marginalizing everyone who's in the field of astronomy.

    For the other post.... our calendar doesn't END every year ... one year is PART of our calenadar. The point was, the calendar ends at at the tail of the snake (quazikotel) and is the end of man. No hebrew or gregorian calendar ends to predict the worlds end. There has also not been an accurate "prediction calendar" that also predicts and end other than this one.

    --
    Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
  82. Why not a 25 bit system? by A55M0NKEY · · Score: 1
    The knots come in groups of seven. Maybe this is like a telephone number in base 25. I say base 25 because there are 24 colors and the possibility of tying no knot ( maybe a zero? ) making 25. And as long as every seventh position on the string is empty, even missing knots aren't going to be that confusing.

    Wasn't there research done that found that seven digits is the average maximum numbers of digits that can be remembered by someone? If there were no phonetic logic between words it might be easier to remember a seven digit number than how to draw a chinese character. 25^7 = 6.1 billion.

    That's way more words than any language I know of has. Probably some of the 24 colors are really not official colors but badly dyed wool. Prolly there is no difference between burgandy and brown in the language if this idea is right. I would look for highly contrasting colors and different pigments used to dye the strings to try and sort out which 'digits' were really meant to be distinct digits.

    --

    Eat at Joe's.

  83. Encoding by S.I.O. · · Score: 1

    And which byte encoding were they using? Little indian or big indian?

    No matter, Linux for khipus is coming out soon, I guess...

  84. Heh. I called it, yo! by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

    I took an "Intro to Archeology" class with my wife. At the same time, I was taking 8 bit logic design and assembly.

    One of the projects was to design your own pictographic language, which was to be compared against others in the class and there were prizes for first place.

    Being a computer geek, the main innovation of my fake language was a system for computing numbers up to 256 on two hands (guess how). This was actually harder than it seems, because we were asked to set the pictograph in a period well before the discovery of the mathematical concept of zero. So, in essence, i had to shift everything down, so the existance of any counting at all (two closed fists) was 1, and a single finger held aloft was 2.

    Anyway, after illustrating to my bored TA how one could easily add numbers by performing a bitwise "and" with another counter, I got second place in the contest. My wife got first place, because hers was not so geeky, and instead painted in a caligraphic hand and it looked beautiful.

    --
    Hey freaks: now you're ju
  85. Re:Quazikotel & The End Of The World + compuro by BigBadBri · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Go, on then - I'll bite.

    It's Quetzalcoatl, and he was a pre-Inca god from the Teohuatican civilisation of south-eastern Mexico.

    The mathematics needed for accurate astronomical records and calendars aren't so special either - the ancient Britons had most of them figured out for the stone circles, purely from centuries of observation and orally transmitted knowledge. The (apocryphal) Book of Enoch also contains sophisticated astronomical references, possibly remembered from the Egyptians, but related to both moon-based and solar circle observatories.

    Counting and long observation from fixed points is all that is needed for astronomy - in fact there's not a lot more involved even now!

    --
    oh brave new world, that has such people in it!
  86. Missing Fingers? by PetoskeyGuy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How about their great knowledge of astronomy. The moon has 28 days in a cycle and 7 days for each quarter to appear. Even more natural since even 3 toed sloths, spiders and turtles could agree on this one. :o)

    For a culture to have picked up a system of writing based on the first guy using it having lost a few digits... Stranger things have happened.

  87. Family Guy Quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Anything can be expressed in binary, as depicted in this famous scene from the Miracle Worker.... 0101001010111010101, 1010101010101110101".

  88. 1,500 are you sure ? by fab_121 · · Score: 1

    Even if they were really bright, these Incas should have something more than us.
    How comes than a seven positions long binary could represent 1,500 pieces of information ?
    I guess it's a ternary (0,1 AND 2) base code which represent on 7 positions 2,182 pieces of informations, right ?

  89. So the Incas can claim prior art on binary? by Idimmu+Xul · · Score: 2, Funny

    Was it Big Indian or Little Indian? BOOM BOOM!

    On a slightly more serious note, wasnt one of the Endians patented, which resulted in the creation of the other Endian (or so said my lecturer) and if so, does this affect things now? Or did the patent expire ages ago anyway?

    --
    The problem with slashdot is that most of its users were bullied and stuffed into lockers as kids!
  90. Re:WARNING::BEARE SURAK = KNOWN TROLL by brakk · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Good try to get people to read your journal

  91. A tale of two temples? by PetoskeyGuy · · Score: 1

    Perhaps it's a list of people they were planning to kill...

  92. Bits? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and found they contain a seven-bit binary code capable of conveying more than 1,500 separate units of information

    7 bits... 2 ^ 7.. 1500... 2 ^ 7.... 1500... something doesn't add up here. Where are the remaining 1373 units coming from?

  93. Re:5, 7, and 10 by CPUGuy · · Score: 1

    You forgot 6, 60 is evenly divisible by 6 :)

    In the end, it all comes down to what they were using it for. I mean, is somone 2000yrs from now who discovers our binary of just 1 and 0 going to say 'Oh my, that's wierd, did the guy who invented that only have 2 fingers and 2 toes?"

    If this 7bit binary was the base of their counting system, then I'd say that's a bit wierd, but it doesn't say that.

  94. Silly Spaniards by Acts+of+Attrition · · Score: 1
    So maybe this article implies that it's the Spaniards' fault for us not having computers earlier?
    Could have changed history as we know it. For instance:

    America's forefathers could have typed up the Declaration of Independence in Word (having lost it a few times after the system crashed, Jefferson just hands in a sloppy version), organized the Boston Lan Party ("BR1T5 R L4M3RS"), and organized Revolutionary War tactics in Quake arena.

  95. Pikachutloatl by bj8rn · · Score: 1

    Few people are aware that Pokemon was originally based on legends of the 150 Aztec gods of war and death. Now you know. (Courtesy of Discordian Intelligence Agency)

    --
    Hell is not other people; it is yourself. - Ludwig Wittgenstein
  96. "Torch" in UK vs. USA by yerricde · · Score: 1

    I don't think artificial light (other than fire) was really an issue.

    Grandparent wrote: "you have to use artificial lights (read: torches)." If I remember correctly, in the United Kingdom, a "torch" is a hand-held electric light. In the United States, speakers call this a "flashlight," and "torch" refers to the old model that used fire.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  97. Well then.. by SkewlD00d · · Score: 1

    I guess Bill Gate'$ patents on 1s and 0s is invalid due to prior art. ;)

    --
    The biggest trick the devil pulled was letting lawyers become politicians so they can write the laws.
  98. This was described in detail by Marcia Ascher by Balaitous · · Score: 2, Informative

    and her husband Robert... in 1997. She published articles about it much earlier.

    Mathematics of the Incas
    Code of the Quipu
    by Marcia Ascher and Robert Ascher
    Dover Publications
    ISBN 0486295540

    Unique, thought-provoking study discusses quipu, an accounting system employing knotted, colored cords, used by Incas to transmit information. Cultural context, mathematics involved, quipu-maker in Inca society-even how to make a quipu. Fascinating for anthropologists, ethnologists, students, general readers. Over 125 photos and illustrations.

    1. Re:This was described in detail by Marcia Ascher by toivotuo · · Score: 1

      The Marcia Ascher & Roobert Ascher book is a good one, but unfortunately a bit dated. The 1997 Dover edition is a re-issue of their earlier book "Mathematics of the Incas: Code of the Quipu" (U of Michigan Press, 1981).

      In addition Ascher & Ascher have published the two Code of the Quipu Databook volumes. These are now available as PDF. In the databooks the Aschers give structural descriptions of some 200+ khipus housed in museums around the world.

      A more recent general survey of the khipu is Quilter & Urton "Narrative Threads: Accounting and Recounting in Andean Khipu" (U of Texas Press, 2002). The essays in the volume include good overviews and treatments of more specialised topics, but the overall theme is investigating the possibility of khipus containing narrative information in addition to their already proven numeric content.

      Personally I am a CS major with a minor in Latin American studies and have been working on computational approaches to the study of the khipu. Currently I am concentrating on an XML schema for expressing the khipus described in the Ascher & Ascher databooks and also on building a "khipu engine" with Prolog. I have a beta on a graphical khipu editor (in Java) capable of expressing the Ascher & Ascher databook khipus; if anyone is interested in trying it out, do drop me a note.

      And if anyone is really interested in this khipu stuff, there is a khipu mailing list available. Do "echo subscribe khipu | mail ecartis@lists.pp.fishpool.fi" to subscribe.

  99. Still arbitrary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your example of the vacuum cleaner isn't arbitrary - the vacuum cleaner needs electricity and the plug and cord is how it gets it.

    On the other hand. There's no reason to say that your word length should be related to the number of fingers you have. That's why it's arbitrary.

  100. related news by nocomment · · Score: 1

    In related news, the longest still-running joke has just been announced to be the "There is only 1 kind of people in the world..."

    --
    /* oops I accidentally made a comment, sorry */
    /* http://allyourbasearebelongto.us */
  101. I disagree. by MickLinux · · Score: 0
    We tend to have such an ego about ourselves

    Depends on the person.

    We think that we are the only ones who've ever had running septic systemsYou mean like the Romans? who moved mountains You mean the pyramids? , and now, it appears, to use binary [maybe we're the first, maybe not. Base-60 was Babylonian, from which we get our hour. Chinese developed base-5 music, base ten is from our hands. Cultures develop number systems that are useful to them.]

    The more we learn, the more we forget. Nice aphorism, but is it true? For example, who can tell me the best mix of Bronze? Start Here, once you know your application. Your "best mix" is always application-dependent. Not many now. No, just most ESMs and metallurgical engineers. There can't be more than 30 of those that graduate from each Tech University each year, so that would be about 120,000 in America. How about what's best to plant after sowing rye for two years? Ummm. That would be Lithuanian farmers. Their biggest crop is rye, possibly after potatoes, so they definitely would know. But it depends on a lot of things -- start here. But I expect most Aggie schools could tell you, depending on where you live.

    As we move into a more technological society, there is quite a bit of knowledge we are losing. Not true at all. You just are not aware of it. The knowledge is being maintained and built on every single year. This is largely because of population growth. Get a population crash, and I grant that it is possible for information to be lost, though that information that is *preserved* in books can later be relearned. Books, not computers, since books last a good bit longer, provided that the paper is non-acidic.

    Not only that, but information which *was* lost, due to population crashes, is being rediscovered through modern technology.

    So we aren't losing information -- far from it. We are keeping the information, and gaining it. But you, yourself, like any other one person, cannot keep abreast of it all, so you *think* we are losing information. And that, really, is my point.

    --
    Correct Horse Battery Staple: 72 bits of entropy. Enter "Correct H" into google. When it generates the phrase, that's
  102. Secrets of Lost Empires by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Was the programme you watched this one?

  103. Colours? by Hittite+Creosote · · Score: 2, Funny
    Maybe they just liked to add colours

    So these Incas were like your average businessmen with a powerpoint presentations then?

    1. Re:Colours? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      So these Incas were like your average businessmen with a powerpoint presentations then?
      I think you're making a very patronising comment about some people's culture and their apparent technical primitiveness. Still, it's only businessmen, so bollocks to 'em.
  104. Read the article? =) by Andorion · · Score: 1

    Professor Urton's study found there are, theoretically, seven points in the making of a khipu where the maker could make a simple choice between two possibilities, a seven-bit binary code. For instance, he or she could choose between weaving a string made of cotton or of wool, or they could weave in a "spin" or "ply" direction, or hang the pendant from the front of the primary string or from the back. In a strict seven-bit code this would give 128 permutations (two to the power of seven) but Professor Urton said because there were 24 possible colours that could be used in khipu construction, the actual permutations are 1,536 (or two to the power of six, multiplied by 24).

    (2^6)*24=1536

    ~Berj

  105. Just great by Silvertre · · Score: 1

    Just wait, SCO will claim that they infact invented and own the IP to binary now, and that the incas stole it from them.

  106. Re:Quazikotel & The End Of The World + compuro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >>It's Quetzalcoatl, and he was a pre-Inca god from the Teohuatican civilisation of south-eastern Mexico.

    Close.

    Pre-Aztec, though his name is Nahuatl (the language of the Aztecs). He was called Kukulcan by the Maya and probably orginated in the Mayan region (which is SE Mexico/Guatemala/Honduras). But the name Quetzalcoatl is Aztec (or as they called themselves, Mexica).

    And Teotihuacan is located near present-day Puebla, which is in Central Mexico and not that far from the Tenochtitlan, the capital of the Mexica empire (present-day Mexico City).

    Generally, you don't call something pre-Incan unless it is related to the region with the Incas. Like the Guari or Moche (near Lake Titicaca and coastal Peru, respectively).

  107. Is this news? by briglass · · Score: 1

    Is this really *news*? Researchers at the beginning of the century figured out that the chords were used as a substitute for writing... And since the chords have various colors, it's not really base 2... 10 colors would make it base 20 (since there are 2 positions), and so on! Call me when they decipher it.......... this is not news.

    --

    ----
    "Those who quote others are more likely to one day be quoted" -Tom Planter
  108. Yes by rodentia · · Score: 1

    And it is widely held that Leibnitz read and was influenced by an early German translation of the work. In fact, one of the organizations of hexagrams, the *Sequence of Later Heaven*, corresponds directly to the binary sequence representing decimal 1-64, top-endian. Using that fact, one can build a simple program to calculate the oracle using binary math instead of a matrix.

    --
    illegitimii non ingravare
  109. Re:Three-Dimensional Written Language? I don' tink by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is evidence that the distance from the main string made a difference in the quantities that each knot represented. So at least 2-dimensions.

  110. Re:WARNING::BEARE SURAK = KNOWN TROLL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I didn't do it. I have some stupid troll who's been trolling my journal since I wrote about $$$$$exyGal in it. I initially thought it was $$$$exyGal, but seeing as how the trolling actually picked up a bit while she was on vacation, I realize now that it's not her.

    Anyway, bottom line, the troll thinks I'm ekrout aka A Proud American. I'm neither of these people, I proved to the guy who I was, and the fscker still won't leave alone. So whatever. I'm just ignoring the asshat now.

    Posting anonymously because someone will mark this OT.

    Surak

  111. Different from other standards, how? by mdielmann · · Score: 1

    How is this any different than deg. Celsius, deg. Farenheit, and Kelvin? Celsius set 0 equal to water freezing at one atmosphere, 100 equal to water boiling. Who knows why Farenheit set his scale where he did (0 is the coldest it got 9 years out of 10 in his neighborhood?)? Kelvin set 0 to Absolute 0, and used the same scale as Celsius.

    Just about everyone uses years to measure time, and the accuracy seems to be the limits of the society that developed the standard. Which year counts ar the start of the standard seems to be fairly arbitrary, but is usually set at great events. You may not think Jesus' birth was extraordinary, but within 400 years, a significant part of the world knew about it, better than pretty much any king before his time. If we had an accurate value for the creation of this world (if you're a Creationist) or the start of this universe (if you're not), but no one can give us either to within a year, so it would lead to another arbitrary starting point. So we may as well stick with the arbitrary one that we have.

    --
    Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
    1. Re:Different from other standards, how? by bj8rn · · Score: 1
      Heh. To add to your list, 1 meter is the length of a certain metal rod at 20 C (Thus follows the question, what is its lenght in meters? Not as easy a question as it seems, by the way).

      Not everybody counts time from Jesus's birth. I don't know what's the starting point for muslims, but the Jews count time from the creation of the world according to the Torah. The Jacobines wanted to reset the 0-year to the year of the Great French Revolution, but they failed - I guess the revolution wasn't great and important enough... In a Matrix-like vision of the future, the beginning point could actually be the building of the first computer (is there a consensus about what exactly was the first computer? I know that according to some, Jesus was born sometime 3 or 4 BC [note: BC doesn't stand for Before Computers!]).

      I guess I should have thought of how extraordinary and important an event Jesus's birth (even if it didn't happen) was. My bad, mostly affected by living in a country where "scientific atheism" was propagated for almost 50 years and time was "before our era" and "our era". Will try to remember it the next time.

      --
      Hell is not other people; it is yourself. - Ludwig Wittgenstein
    2. Re:Different from other standards, how? by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and anything is better than what they had before: In the 3rd year of King Ahasuerus... And the fun of starting from 3 every time a leader dies, and trying to keep track between kingdoms.

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
  112. Re:5, 7, and 10 by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Perhaps Abu Hmza is an Inca?

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  113. Re:5, 7, and 10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if something is divisible by 2 and 3, then it is also divisible by 6.

  114. Incas Suing SCO? by Zacchaeus · · Score: 1

    Did SCO steal any of their technology from the Incas, I wonder?

  115. Site not slashdotted, karma whore/troll by Fastolfe · · Score: 1

    The site is fine, the text of this post is a slightly mangled version of the real article, and this post gets moderated to a 5?

    Please stop blindly moderating posts like this up. In few cases is the site actually slashdotted. More often than not, this is someone trying to get karma or watch in glee as idiot moderators upvote the post. Take a look at this person's comment history if you believe I'm mistaken.

  116. Indians invented binary! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to this article,
    Zero and the Place Value System

    "Pingala, who lived circa the first century BCE, developed a system of binary enumeration convertible to decimal numerals, described in his Chandahsaastra. His system is quite similar to that of Leibniz, who lived roughly fourteen hundred years later. "

  117. Binary chronology by onree · · Score: 1

    An interesting related link to a UPenn compiled chronology leading to computers (that mentions the Incan Quipus).

  118. Antient modems in Africa! by saikou · · Score: 1

    In other news, one of respectable professors have just discovered, that African tribes used antient modems in form of drums with two way communication, error correction, capable of speed of 0.4 bods.
    No news if they used compression yet, so GIF patents still hold. :)

  119. They ain't so different by psychofox · · Score: 1

    Well, its been said more one once that there are only 10 types of people in this world:
    *) Those that understand binary &
    *) Those that don't. :-)

  120. Re:Quazikotel & The End Of The World + compuro by karlm · · Score: 1
    What's interesting about the calendar ending in 2012 is that this is a generally accepted year for The AntiChrist to appear by Bibilical eschatologists. It is also generally the year that is predicted by the Hebrew calendars for the Messiah (the true year 2000 to them I believe) - someone correct my factoids if I'm wrong.

    Bzzt... try again. I'm not Jewish, but the *nix hcal program tells me 2012 is the Jewish year 5773. Quetzalcoatl was one of the main Aztec gods (god of life, IIRC), similar to dieties of other peoples in the region, but I think other peoples used different names for the god.

    How do you get two Biblical Eschatologists to agree? Shoot one. Jesus himself is quoted (Mark 13:32) as saying "hey loonies, you will not know when the world will end ahead of time, so quit trying to predict it."

    Somehow I doubt the Aztec calendar shows knowledge of differentiation and integration. You need to stop watching so much FOX. The human mind is great at finding patterns that aren't there. If you look hard enough, the dunes on Mars clearly describe linear-, differential-, and a previously unkown form of cryptanalysis that renders all cryptography useless and can be applied in reverse to compress random data. As soon as I finish deciphering my map of Mars, I'm going to crack 2048-bit RSA in 13 seconds on my abacus.

    Sure, maybe the Myan caledar ends very clearly in 2012, but this I Ching and other stuff is really subjective interpretation done by someone who probably has knowledge of the Mayan calendar. Maybe if you measure the distance from the top of Mount Everest to the top of the Pyramid of the Moon in Teohuatican (near Mexico City) using King Tut's fake beard as your unit of measure, divide by Pi, E, and the golden ratio then factor the answer you get, you'll get a prime number times the number of days between an innacurate estimate of the date of birth of a particular Hebrew carpenter and Dec 10, 2012, but that doesn't prove that Tut had been to the Himalayas and the Americas, knew advanced math and when the world would end, and had been visited by Christ before his birth. It proves that someone with a lot of time on their hands and a lot of practice with a calculator knows about the Mayan calendar.

    BTW, Jesus was probably born in the year 3 or 4 B.C.

    --
    Copyright Violation:"theft, piracy"::Anti-Trust Violation:"thermonuclear price terrorism"<-Overly dramatic language.
  121. Wait...12/21/2012? by Atario · · Score: 1

    Looks like ternary to me.

    --
    "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
    1. Re:Wait...12/21/2012? by Ceriel+Nosforit · · Score: 1

      20121221 in base 3 gives 4831 in base 10.
      Someone tell me what hebrew word that translates into? If any?

      I'll crunch the numbers a bit more tomorrow. Good night.

      --
      All rites reversed 2010
  122. low hanging fruit troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude, imagine a Beowulf cluster of those khipu strings!

  123. Do you have any proof that Jesus wasn't real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are a decent enough sources alluding to him being a real historical figure. Divine birth is a different thing. The histories by Josephus, Tacitus, and Pliny the Younger point him out as being a real historical figure, while religous doctrine from Jews point him as being a trouble maker and deserving of death.

  124. Re:5, 7, and 10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    5 and 10 are natural numbers because we have ten fingers, ten toes, etc.
    Try counting in binary on your fingers.... really try it! Keep counting, now imagene not having ever seen a pocket calculator but still having to count to around a hundred of something. (have you reached 31 yet? keep counting, its time to use your second hand) Say your are trading animals and you have to count how many there are in a cage. (goten to 63 already? your fingers must be getting tired now but keep counting) And then this other trader ends up adding other animals, you trust this guy so you just add up his count. If neither of you have a specific finger up, you dont have to, if either one has a finger up you have to get it up, if you both have a finger upward go for the next finger (You must be around 256 now, just keep counting) At the end of the day you may have traded between 0 and 1023 animals (carying them home might be a hassle as your hands might have worn out by now)
    So:
    • Count in binary on your fingers
    • have fun
    • keep doing it till it feels natural to you
    • profit!!


    Assignment for next lesson, is it posible the indians cared about big or little endianess?
  125. Re:5, 7, and 10 by hawkfish · · Score: 1

    Before you get too enamoured of your armchair theories, have a look at this book.

    --
    You will not drink with us, but you would taste our steel? - Walter Matthau, The Pirates
  126. Re:5, 7, and 10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fractions are not natural and the fact that 12 is divisible by 3 and 4 (but not by 5) doesn't make it, as a base, more natural than 10. In fact, I'm pretty sure 10 was chosen as a base well before fractions were invented.

    I agree using base 12 makes dividing a number by 3 easier but, it makes counting on finger much more difficult. As for 60... well humans are not intelligent enough to learn, in a reasonnable amount of time, its multiplication tables.

    As for the clock... I wonder who chose 24 hours of 60 minutes instead of 10 hours of 100 minutes...

  127. Not so much information by rpg25 · · Score: 2

    The khipus actually seem like that great a system, if I followed the article correctly. When the author compared the khipu with Sumerian cuneiform, it was an apples and oranges comparison.

    The khipu seems to be a fixed-length message format capable of carrying a not-enormous amount of data.

    On the other hand, the cuneiform symbols are symbols, that can be composed into arbitrary length messages, yielding a theoretically infinite number of messages.

    The article really wasn't very clear about this. Can anyone clarify? If each khipu is an entire message, then they don't carry very much info at all. OTOH, if khipus can be composed, then they are potentially very powerful.

    Even if the khipu had more different symbols than the latin alphabet, big deal. The latin alphabet is already enough to convey all that anyone needs. Having a bigger alphabet at best buys you compression in terms of surface area, but at the expense of complexity elsewhere in the communication system. I could add a few letters to English orthography (e.g., theta), and it might regularize the spelling a little, but it wouldn't make us all smarter, or able to write new books. Of course, in an ideographic scheme that's not true....

  128. Dienary by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    They did sacrifices by throwing you off their stone towers. After landing, you were either alive(1) or dead(0).

  129. Base 11 by brer_rabbit · · Score: 1

    Base 11 is fairly easy to use for men that leave their zippers down.

  130. pantents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Incas have the binary patent yet?

  131. Re:5, 7, and 10 by qvatch · · Score: 0

    lets see... .5+.33=.83 or about 8 tenths... Not too complicated.

  132. Re:5, 7, and 10 by lommer · · Score: 1

    Actually, the ancient babylonians used base 60.
    And as for muiltiplaction, its hard no matter what base you use if you ask me...

  133. IBM (Incan Business Machines) have ... by fygment · · Score: 1

    ... the patents on binary! So that means that SCO has been using ... whoa! I can hear the lawyers salivating from here.

    --
    "Consensus" in science is _always_ a political construct.
  134. Jumpers by Pseudonymus+Bosch · · Score: 1

    I have read that, actually, the word "jumper" comes from Quechua "chompa".

    --
    __
    Men with no respect for life must never be allowed to control the ultimate instruments of death.
    GW Bu
  135. Pythagorean elements, I Ching, Odu Ifa, etc, etc by guanno · · Score: 1

    Numerous very ancient systems of metaphysics and science make use of binary systems of thought at their foundation. While they are not all mathematical in the sense we commonly imagine, like mathematics, each binary based system is intended to symbolise and measure the activity of natural phenomena. In the end, whether a system is mathematical or not is an arbitrary chicken/egg question which reduces to whether one system describes the other better or more precisely according to our personal perspectives.

    The Taoist I Ching for instance is a metaphysical understanding of the cosmos founded on the binary yin/yang polarity. These represent the receptive (matter) and active (energy) principals of nature respectively. These purely conceptual polarities are next featured in juxtiposition as trigrams, which arrise from the observation that the triangle is the first geometrically 2D shape. As such they represent the basic building blocks of nature on a qualitative level, and mathematically combine to make up a total of 2^3=8 bagua (elemental trigrams). Since yin and yang are understood to arrise from the essential paradox we call life, it is also understood that they each contain their opposite. Likewise since the trigrams each represent a material quality of yin/yang, they must also have a corresponding energetic quality. As such each of the manifested 8 elements has a yin and yang counterpart in the form of a hexagram. Thus the I Ching is ultimately composed of 8^2=64 hexagrams which represent each of the possible distinct manifestations of yin/yang in nature.

    In Western mathematics we find a similar line of thinking expressed by Empedocles who was an initiate of the Pythagorean order. As a mystic philosopher, Empedocles gives us a profound and simple insight into the concepts upon which Pythagorean cosmology, and therefore also our Western math are based. As Aristotle explains in his essay on generation and corruption, Empedocles cosmology is based upon two primal opposites (our binary system), from which all other elements take shape. Aristotle likens the two most basic elements to matter and energy specifically, though they take their basis in myth from a more subjective qualitative pair, love and strife respectively. Love is thus the conceptual force which draws together and binds things, and strife that which seperates and repells. Empedocles likened Love to the element of earth and Strife to fire, though as I mentioned Aristotle clarifies the poetic inference to mean matter and energy respectively. Here is where things diverge from the Chinese system. Empedocles explains that these two elements mix to form the mediating elements of water and air. In affect he is indicating the phases of matter, though much more than this is implied since it is not merely a science of physical observation as much as it is a profound insight into the extreme conceptual qualities of all our percievable existance. The duad of primal western math are none other than the immovable object and irresistable force. Plato takes the geometric configuration of the elements into 3 dimensions in his discussion of the Platonic Solids, though they also feature symbolically in the essential circle (matter) and line (energy) of Euclidian geometry. The roots of math are as deep as the human condition, love and war, and the harmony which is born of these equal and undeniable laws of human nature. It's not practical to note all of the many permutations of this system of thought which arrose from the mediteranean, but suffice it to say that the 5 elements of occult fame, still have relevance and preoccupy the minds of scientists of all sorts to this day, though they don't know it and would likely deny it were even the mere possibility suggested. Nonetheless, the same system of mathematical/metaphysical symbolism found it's way from Grecian philosophy to Hebrew mysticism and doctrine, from Theogony and Isopsephia to Kabbalah and Gematria respectively.

    Similar systems of cosmology and mathematics arrise in many other diverse systems such

  136. QUICK by rock_climbing_guy · · Score: 1

    call Jeff Bezos!!!

    --
    Wh47 d1d j00 541, 31337 15n't t3h r0xor5 ne m0r3???
  137. Those jerks! by paroneayea · · Score: 1

    So all their language is in binary then? Unfair. They should have released it open source!

    --
    http://mediagoblin.org/
  138. what, computers but no wheel?! by guest12 · · Score: 1

    maybe they didnt find the wheel useful on the high mountain roads. didnt they have pulleys for ropes? difficult to believe. they had a sun god thing and made huge gold discs --but no wheels. tell that to the llamas.*spit

  139. I wonder if they patented the knotting process. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure would cause some problems.

  140. Binary Patent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Too bad I wasn't an Inca, then I could patent binary and sue SCO, IBM and everyone else.

  141. Re:Three-Dimensional Written Language? I don' tink by da2 · · Score: 1

    ahh, but it still isnt written, more of tied. so its a "Two dimensional tied language"