car past tests because things are not noted as broken because of some error or bad test or something else, I cant see how you fail too see that car gets cleared in rego tests even with faults
its actually physically possible, one example is that the brake fails and the failing of the brakes is not something the driver could have done about, maybe some manufacturing fault, + that the driver might be in a middle lane and the left and right lane has cars as well so they couldn’t steer away
yes its true that rules are not laws, but breaking some rules might get you charged for breaking some law, as it is depending on the rules of whom you break and how they take it
there are rules and laws for a reason, and those thousands of * will be spent anyway because the government will not stop paying the people even if they had less things to do(thats highly unlikely)
now lets talk about that the time and resources could be used for better things instead
and side note, here they have realised that ppl might want to charge their phones\latptops\whatever so they have installed plugs for use in the overground, underground and trains
there is one, its not just official but most courts abide by it, and if they push it to the eu court then after that the outcome will be set as precedence for the whole of europe
so you mean your friend of yours is telling about military secrets to ppl outside the military?
this could be a simple thing that is called patenting and that maybe they are only to be sold to the military for they use to have advantages over other military, just because things exist means that they will be made available to the general populace for various reasons
and btw, the op of the thread was obviously sarcastic
google doesnt have an newspaper licence or what they are called, and with that forcing them to be removed would impede on free speech(if the country follows that)
this, but even it seems that they want a system that they can offer x apis to customers and then charge them more to use other apis they might have, and that is a sound business model if it works out for them
considering the article has in the first sentence a link to the original article linking to it here in the way you are doing seems highly unnecessary, you sound like douche plain and simple
they are not yet charging google for anything about android, considering the latest investigation took 5 years to make an charge we will see how in about that time how this comes about
now is it to google to show that they are not breaking any rules and that they can behave
no, its the app-maker making it difficult to use without google, and for them is taking the "easy way out", no but seriously, why should a app-maker need to make it more difficult for themselves just because you want to have alternatives?
in this case it was a remake, they could have followed the water fall method for that as they probably had how the game would work, story and probably a target audience already
what the lacked seemed to be an project manger\customer manager who could set his foot down and had probably a very bad written contract
why not?, you might not be able to pass as someone else, but I guess if you make special contacts with a weight(yes this exist) and small lines in the contacts that reflect the light so the combination of the contacts + your natural blood vessels in the retina could make a pattern of its own, and if you belong to a spy-organisation you could probably pass as a fake\made up person
or maybe have special contacts that doesnt pass any light from behind them but reflects what you want and be able to pass as someone else
all big titles that came out 2004, even halo 2 came out before hf2 even if it was by a week, but I played ut2004 and it has vehicles(it came out march)
bf1942 was released 2002
the only thing new was the source engine, the game half-life 2 by it self wasnt any marvel of its time, but it had a great story and was well made, but frankly it doesnt and didnt stand up to bring in new things into game play mechanics for its time
I never saw that half-life 2 had so much more to add to game play compared to half-life 1, the only thing i remember was that you had car\boat you could drive around and a weapon that lets you pick up things to throw, like saw blades at zombies
Really there wasnt much it did do revolutionary in game play when it came out, alot of different more games were released at that time that did have more game play mechanics that half-life 2
CS:GO dosnt have all the new things, heck it is a very basic game compared to even TF, so new things are neat, but we can see that new things are not all that is needed to have a good game
I could go to say that maybe valve has a writers block for the story or the developers like mojang got tired that people(players) expected to have it all now now and as great it is in their(playes) mind that the developers got tired of it and said fuck it, I move on
probably so that people have the feeling that they are being watched, even if they used normal traffic lights and cameras it would not have the same impact as traffic light and cameras in a humanoid form
Slashdot Mirror
I did not answer on anything related to whose fault it was, only to the claim that it was physically impossible that he made
car past tests because things are not noted as broken because of some error or bad test or something else, I cant see how you fail too see that car gets cleared in rego tests even with faults
its actually physically possible, one example is that the brake fails and the failing of the brakes is not something the driver could have done about, maybe some manufacturing fault, + that the driver might be in a middle lane and the left and right lane has cars as well so they couldn’t steer away
yes its true that rules are not laws, but breaking some rules might get you charged for breaking some law, as it is depending on the rules of whom you break and how they take it
there are rules and laws for a reason, and those thousands of * will be spent anyway because the government will not stop paying the people even if they had less things to do(thats highly unlikely)
now lets talk about that the time and resources could be used for better things instead
and side note, here they have realised that ppl might want to charge their phones\latptops\whatever so they have installed plugs for use in the overground, underground and trains
nah I rather keep it for the porn and illegal video streaming sites, oohhh and dont forget all the fury porn flash "games"
I cant really see shooting missiles against each other is considered dogfighting, as most ppl will think ww1-2 dogfighting when using that word
there is one, its not just official but most courts abide by it, and if they push it to the eu court then after that the outcome will be set as precedence for the whole of europe
so you mean your friend of yours is telling about military secrets to ppl outside the military?
this could be a simple thing that is called patenting and that maybe they are only to be sold to the military for they use to have advantages over other military, just because things exist means that they will be made available to the general populace for various reasons
and btw, the op of the thread was obviously sarcastic
google doesnt have an newspaper licence or what they are called, and with that forcing them to be removed would impede on free speech(if the country follows that)
this, but even it seems that they want a system that they can offer x apis to customers and then charge them more to use other apis they might have, and that is a sound business model if it works out for them
considering the article has in the first sentence a link to the original article linking to it here in the way you are doing seems highly unnecessary, you sound like douche plain and simple
I thought that studio were involved with bioshock 2 and not so much with infinite
I have played it, it wasnt that good and even most reviews were meh about it so I dont think it made the money back
develop good games instead
they are not yet charging google for anything about android, considering the latest investigation took 5 years to make an charge we will see how in about that time how this comes about
now is it to google to show that they are not breaking any rules and that they can behave
no, its the app-maker making it difficult to use without google, and for them is taking the "easy way out", no but seriously, why should a app-maker need to make it more difficult for themselves just because you want to have alternatives?
in this case it was a remake, they could have followed the water fall method for that as they probably had how the game would work, story and probably a target audience already
what the lacked seemed to be an project manger\customer manager who could set his foot down and had probably a very bad written contract
why not?, you might not be able to pass as someone else, but I guess if you make special contacts with a weight(yes this exist) and small lines in the contacts that reflect the light so the combination of the contacts + your natural blood vessels in the retina could make a pattern of its own, and if you belong to a spy-organisation you could probably pass as a fake\made up person
or maybe have special contacts that doesnt pass any light from behind them but reflects what you want and be able to pass as someone else
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2...
all big titles that came out 2004, even halo 2 came out before hf2 even if it was by a week, but I played ut2004 and it has vehicles(it came out march)
bf1942 was released 2002
the only thing new was the source engine, the game half-life 2 by it self wasnt any marvel of its time, but it had a great story and was well made, but frankly it doesnt and didnt stand up to bring in new things into game play mechanics for its time
I never saw that half-life 2 had so much more to add to game play compared to half-life 1, the only thing i remember was that you had car\boat you could drive around and a weapon that lets you pick up things to throw, like saw blades at zombies
Really there wasnt much it did do revolutionary in game play when it came out, alot of different more games were released at that time that did have more game play mechanics that half-life 2
CS:GO dosnt have all the new things, heck it is a very basic game compared to even TF, so new things are neat, but we can see that new things are not all that is needed to have a good game
I could go to say that maybe valve has a writers block for the story or the developers like mojang got tired that people(players) expected to have it all now now and as great it is in their(playes) mind that the developers got tired of it and said fuck it, I move on
seems they ended it with a cliffhanger and now they dont know how to end it
thats is if you ever believed that computer were 100% secure
http://gs.statcounter.com/
http://www.w3counter.com/globa...
probably so that people have the feeling that they are being watched, even if they used normal traffic lights and cameras it would not have the same impact as traffic light and cameras in a humanoid form