Actually, worse yet, the data has to be decrypted into memory and sent to your sound card. All you need is a driver to act like a sound card, to write to your disc.
No security is full proof. Making your security more obscure raises the bar on breaking it. Key locks are not secure, and most can use a master key. Having the locks there make it hard for the novice to get in. Stegonography too is like that. Sure, an expert MAY be able to get in, but a novice? It's just a little harder.
Simple. Use 0. If there's a state change of some number greater than 0 to 0, it's a death. If something is already AT 0, it's already dead. Can't attack dead things, eh?
Re:What are you talking about?
on
Effective XML
·
· Score: 1
I think he's talking about it's displayed in hierarchical way, though you can reference nodes in the language.
There's a difference. CB traffic is usually casual conversation. People create websites to give out "important" information to a large spectrum.
One has an active listener with active feedback. One is completely passive.
Only in the case of an interview would CB traffic be completely informational. I don't remember the last time I put up a web page to say something to someone. People do put up "web applications" such as forums and chatrooms of sorts.
While they are of the same fruit, they are still apples and oranges.
M. Robertson is a business person first and foremost. It's all a game of making money. If it's not making money, you have to do/something/. If he had tons of money and doing this for the sake of charity, or the greater good, , then it'd be fine to criticize him. If you can do a better job, then please do.
I'm no robertson lover, but running a business is a very hard thing to do. No one likes creating a money maker and then selling it off just for the cash. They'd rather make MORE money.
Says the person with a normal size mailbox. I recently had to call a dept store to tell them to not mail me their catalogues. I get one for me, one for the woman, in this tiny little apartment building box.
Yes, I *COULD* get a postbox, but my mail box is meant for mail, not bulky items that bend and fill it up.
no... you know that power companies sell each other electricity. Heck, electric companies will buy electricity from those that produce. Think wind energy and lots of fields.
This isn't a case of stupidity of the gov't. It's probably stupidity of not testing their systems periodically for failover. And not the entire grid testing for failover, which would be ideal, but just one company. Or so says the report..
You argue for one side of the coin, where a layer 2 router does just that, and a layer 3 router inspect its data. A level 4.. 5.. so on and so on.. Best device for it's job right?
But you can argue the other way.
All a router does is inspect a level of the network layer, pulls out some data, and pushes the traffic depending on that layer. So what's wrong with a router or switch inspecting one layer more? Routers and switches already do it on the mac and ip level. Nothing wrong w/ inspecting the application data level:)
I'm a bit more on the tech side, and my gf, who lives w/ me, isn't. She knows how to ssh about and look at files, but that's about it.
Anyway, we host a mail server for ourselves. To show her I trust her and she shoudl trust me, I've given her root on the mail server. I explained to her completely how the mail system works and if she ever so wants to, look, but don't edit. Otherwise, things could break in ugly ways.
Perhaps some funky thing like, having URLs, IMs and tcp connections logged to another comptuer that you (parents) can write to, but anyone can view. Setup view accounts and keep tabs on "last" to at least know who's been on the machine. It probably would be a concern that your children shouldn't see what the others are doing, unless it's harmless type stuff, but that's hard to determine on-the-fly. And keep the logs of what's seen older than a day, so you can filter your own naughtier bits.
It's not fool proof. It's not intended to be. Worse comes to worse, the kid can use another machine, outside the home, and do whatever he wants. The point of the exercise is to show trust. When they are "of age", explain that certain things are "ok" to look at, and you won't be surprised or pissed, but to not allow others to know, or else access will be taken away.
Once all your kids are of age and show responsibility, take the device away.
Simple as that. I guess the goal, all-in-all, is to teach responsibility for their own actions and mutual respect. Sorta like lending your kid the car. First you make sure they can drive, then some day, they can go on their own, eh?
Um.. yes it is. Unless you usually drive underground all the time. Most of the time, one who drives outside of large metropolitan cities have line of sight. Once you are in line of sight, it'll re-buffer.
Funny thing is, I normally get at least 9 hours and if I don't sit there skipping songs all day, 10 hours of play per charge.
Something with version 1.2 or so of the firmware screwed up the battery life to a max of 8 hours, but it was fixed and is back up to 10.
This brings up a good question.. who listens to 10 hours of continuous music a day? Why is this even thought of as a problem by C-Net? The iPod sseems to have the average amount of play time among all the players.
Re:seen the price of VS.NET?
on
Kylix in Limbo
·
· Score: 1, Funny
Uh.. that depends on the registrar. Last I checked, netsol/verisign didnt' run.co.uk.
It also depends if the registrar in question decides to ignore the expiration of the domain and makes it available, not by checking the registry but their own local db.
Just 'cause it doesn't get deleted till 54 days later doesn't mean the registrar can't sell the rights away.
Slashdot Mirror
Actually, worse yet, the data has to be decrypted into memory and sent to your sound card. All you need is a driver to act like a sound card, to write to your disc.
-s
No security is full proof. Making your security more obscure raises the bar on breaking it. Key locks are not secure, and most can use a master key. Having the locks there make it hard for the novice to get in. Stegonography too is like that. Sure, an expert MAY be able to get in, but a novice? It's just a little harder.
Simple. Use 0. If there's a state change of some number greater than 0 to 0, it's a death. If something is already AT 0, it's already dead. Can't attack dead things, eh?
I think he's talking about it's displayed in hierarchical way, though you can reference nodes in the language.
:)
(Note to other readers, all tree's are graphs
Depends.
Do you need to find the cure for cancer via simulations faster or do you need to send a machine up on a 747?
Different needs, different solutions.
There's a difference. CB traffic is usually casual conversation. People create websites to give out "important" information to a large spectrum.
One has an active listener with active feedback. One is completely passive.
Only in the case of an interview would CB traffic be completely informational. I don't remember the last time I put up a web page to say something to someone. People do put up "web applications" such as forums and chatrooms of sorts.
While they are of the same fruit, they are still apples and oranges.
Then people would be able to flood the system. It also wouldn't be as portable as a website.
M. Robertson is a business person first and foremost. It's all a game of making money. If it's not making money, you have to do /something/. If he had tons of money and doing this for the sake of charity, or the greater good, , then it'd be fine to criticize him. If you can do a better job, then please do.
I'm no robertson lover, but running a business is a very hard thing to do. No one likes creating a money maker and then selling it off just for the cash. They'd rather make MORE money.
Says the person with a normal size mailbox. I recently had to call a dept store to tell them to not mail me their catalogues. I get one for me, one for the woman, in this tiny little apartment building box.
Yes, I *COULD* get a postbox, but my mail box is meant for mail, not bulky items that bend and fill it up.
-s
no... you know that power companies sell each other electricity. Heck, electric companies will buy electricity from those that produce. Think wind energy and lots of fields.
..
This isn't a case of stupidity of the gov't. It's probably stupidity of not testing their systems periodically for failover. And not the entire grid testing for failover, which would be ideal, but just one company. Or so says the report
-s
You argue for one side of the coin, where a layer 2 router does just that, and a layer 3 router inspect its data. A level 4.. 5.. so on and so on.. Best device for it's job right?
:)
But you can argue the other way.
All a router does is inspect a level of the network layer, pulls out some data, and pushes the traffic depending on that layer. So what's wrong with a router or switch inspecting one layer more? Routers and switches already do it on the mac and ip level. Nothing wrong w/ inspecting the application data level
You see that big foot by the article? Or Mr taco's comment for the "dept"? Or the category? Or the site that's selling it?
;)
I think you didn't quite put 2+2 together. But if you did, you somehow got 40k
I'm a bit more on the tech side, and my gf, who lives w/ me, isn't. She knows how to ssh about and look at files, but that's about it.
Anyway, we host a mail server for ourselves. To show her I trust her and she shoudl trust me, I've given her root on the mail server. I explained to her completely how the mail system works and if she ever so wants to, look, but don't edit. Otherwise, things could break in ugly ways.
Perhaps some funky thing like, having URLs, IMs and tcp connections logged to another comptuer that you (parents) can write to, but anyone can view. Setup view accounts and keep tabs on "last" to at least know who's been on the machine. It probably would be a concern that your children shouldn't see what the others are doing, unless it's harmless type stuff, but that's hard to determine on-the-fly. And keep the logs of what's seen older than a day, so you can filter your own naughtier bits.
It's not fool proof. It's not intended to be. Worse comes to worse, the kid can use another machine, outside the home, and do whatever he wants. The point of the exercise is to show trust. When they are "of age", explain that certain things are "ok" to look at, and you won't be surprised or pissed, but to not allow others to know, or else access will be taken away.
Once all your kids are of age and show responsibility, take the device away.
Simple as that. I guess the goal, all-in-all, is to teach responsibility for their own actions and mutual respect. Sorta like lending your kid the car. First you make sure they can drive, then some day, they can go on their own, eh?
What if the trojan hacks someone's computer and then makes itself scarce, ala a rootkit?
Can you get windows 2k running with 30 users on a p2-266?
How about giving people access to a development unix jboss webapps directory, directly from their windows workstations?
Sometimes, it's not whether windows is good or bad.. it's just bloody inconvenient with what you have before you.
Duh. Point is to at least have tv at all, not necessarily keep a continuous stream.
Um.. yes it is. Unless you usually drive underground all the time. Most of the time, one who drives outside of large metropolitan cities have line of sight. Once you are in line of sight, it'll re-buffer.
Or don't you see that.
Hah! Easy problem. Easy solution. Use something like tivo and buffer tv by say, the amount of time you expect to be out of line-of-sight.
And most everywhere isn't obscured... just those who live in cities. On the open road, you mostly have clear skies.
Now it they could only stop spyware and crap that integrated with aps in nasty ways you can't remove.
Bloody registry entries..
Not all updates require restarts. Some which I suspect use kernel extensions, prolly do, just to ensure that they get unloaded and reloaded properly.
Funny thing is, I normally get at least 9 hours and if I don't sit there skipping songs all day, 10 hours of play per charge.
Something with version 1.2 or so of the firmware screwed up the battery life to a max of 8 hours, but it was fixed and is back up to 10.
This brings up a good question.. who listens to 10 hours of continuous music a day? Why is this even thought of as a problem by C-Net? The iPod sseems to have the average amount of play time among all the players.
Apple. Orange. Meet the Fruit Fucker 2000!
But you forget, the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few.
:)
Sorry.. couldn't help it.
If he were running IIS on his home machine connecting to then net... then he'd just be dumb.
Uh.. that depends on the registrar. Last I checked, netsol/verisign didnt' run .co.uk.
It also depends if the registrar in question decides to ignore the expiration of the domain and makes it available, not by checking the registry but their own local db.
Just 'cause it doesn't get deleted till 54 days later doesn't mean the registrar can't sell the rights away.