Slashdot Mirror


The Official Samba 3 HOWTO and Reference Guide

Matt Will writes "The Official Samba 3 How-To and Reference Guide was written by John H. Terpstra and Jelmer Rinze Vernooij in collaboration with the core developers of the Samba-Team (www.samba.org) and expert end users. The book is written with special focus towards administrators of Microsoft Windows systems, giving them a first insight into the capabilities of Samba and a well guided step-by-step guide for migrating systems from a Microsoft solution to Samba." Read on for the rest of Will's review. The Official Samba-3 HOWTO and Reference Guide author John H. Terpstra, Jelmer R. Vernooij pages 736 publisher Prentice Hall rating 9 reviewer Matt Will ISBN 0131453556 summary Good summary of setting up, using, and troubleshooting Samba 3

The book itself For people with little time, the book starts with the chapter "FastStart: Cure for the Impatient," which features many example configurations of working solutions, each illustrating working setups using Samba to different ends -- as a file and print server, CD-ROM server, etc.

In the following chapters, the How-To and Reference Guide deals with all aspects of server and security modes, domain control and backup domain control and stand-alone configurations. Each of the chapters include further example configurations as well as in-depth discussion of the chapter's topic, and a "common errors" section that answers the most obvious real life errors.

In the third part of the book (Advanced Configuration) the reader is presented with detailed information on the topics of network browsing, account information databases, and group mapping from MS Windows to the Unix world, as well as file, directory and share access controls and file and record locking. There is also a second chapter about security in this part of the book.
Still in the third part, the book explains the new features of Samba 3.0.0, for instance interdomain trust relationships and distributed file systems.

Two very thorough chapters explain the conventional printing support with Samba, as well as printing via the newer print system CUPS. Following short chapters about winbind and network management, the Guide explains how to set up and maintain system and account policies, and how to exercise desktop profile management, and provides short but informative chapters about PAM authentication, Windows/Samba network integration, character sets, and some words about backups and high availability.

Part 4 of the Samba How-To Guide deals exclusively with updating and migrating from Samba 2.x to Samba 3.0.0, including an example migration from a NT4 PDC to a Samba-3 PDC and a user guide to the SWAT (graphical interface for configuring Samba) tool.

In part 5 (Troubleshooting) the reader is given a very good checklist to verify all functions of the Samba installation are working correctly and a guide how to analyze and solve problems with Samba.

In the appendices, the book gives information on how to obtain and compile Samba, lists supported platforms, gives hints for performance tuning, dhcp and dns, and includes the man pages to the Samba programs and configuration files.

Primary audience The book is written for people in the "Windows world" who want to take a look into the services and possibilities Samba offers for them. Beginners get very detailed information which things are possible with Samba and which are not (for now), as well as the necessary background for installing and configuring Samba on a Unix/Linux system. For the advanced user, there are still some diamonds of new information and also a good reference for all the new settings and options in the new Samba release. Personal Rating I can recommend this book to everyone interested in Samba - especially the new 3.0 version - no matter if you are new to Samba or even an experienced user of the software who is interested in expanding your knowledge and trying new features. It has its place on my bookshelf of very useful documentation.

You can purchase The Official Samba 3 HOWTO and Reference Guide from bn.com. Slashdot welcomes readers' book reviews -- to see your own review here, read the book review guidelines, then visit the submission page.

156 comments

  1. i have a question by theMerovingian · · Score: 2, Flamebait

    The book is written with special focus towards administrators of Microsoft Windows systems giving them a first insight into the capabilities of Samba and a well guided step by step guide for migrating systems from a Microsoft solution to Samba.

    Wait a minute - What's wrong with Microsoft?

    --
    "If you think you have things under control, you're not going fast enough." --Mario Andretti
    1. Re:i have a question by sporty · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Can you get windows 2k running with 30 users on a p2-266?

      How about giving people access to a development unix jboss webapps directory, directly from their windows workstations?

      Sometimes, it's not whether windows is good or bad.. it's just bloody inconvenient with what you have before you.

      --

      -
      ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

    2. Re:i have a question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      can you get windows 2k running?

  2. Pizza? by SharpFang · · Score: 4, Funny

    Do they include more info on delivering Pizza to Samba authors?

    --
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    1. Re:Pizza? by lintux · · Score: 2, Informative

      I was once told that Mr. Tridgell got enough pizza's in house for the rest of his life, so I guess they left that part out now. :-)

  3. How does it compare to the online docs? by ErikTheRed · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I seriously considered purchasing this book the other day, however, I paused because its contents sound so similar to what you download with the product for free. If there are better explanations, information, etc., I would love to acquire it. Does anyone familiar with both have any comments?

    --

    Help save the critically endangered Blue Iguana
    1. Re:How does it compare to the online docs? by zontroll · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've seen many books where the contents were just copies of man pages, javadocs or online documentation. (a lot of the books reviewed here on /. are anywhere between 25-75% copies of documentation with very little original thought by the authors).

      People like to curl up with their book, so they don't mind paying for a printed copy of the online docs. Personally, I'm waiting for paper-thin organic displays to replace paper books before I move back from reading online docs at my computer to reading on my couch or bed.

    2. Re:How does it compare to the online docs? by Ianoo · · Score: 1

      I've also found that a non-technical manager-types will be much happier if they see that there are printed books as opposed to HTML online, no matter how good that HTML might be. It makes the product seem more "official", I guess...

    3. Re:How does it compare to the online docs? by nerijus · · Score: 1

      Yes, there are docs how to set up LDAP, kerberos, etc. There are even full working configurations for a few cases - PDC, BDC, NT, w2k etc. When people asked how to setup that or that in mailing list, usual answer was to wait for this book.

    4. Re:How does it compare to the online docs? by digitalsushi · · Score: 1

      I'm waiting for them to make a couch or bed with the same shape as the back of an office chair before I go back to reading there.

      --
      slashdot: where everyone yells sarcastic metaphors to themselves to understand the issue
    5. Re:How does it compare to the online docs? by woozlewuzzle · · Score: 0, Redundant

      As someone new to Samba, who has been trudging through the online version and all of its mistakes, I went to the book store today to check out the printed version.

      The same mistakes are still there. It is really just a collection of HOW-TOs which did not seem to be very well reviewed.

      I chose not to purchase it just yet.

      YMMV

    6. Re:How does it compare to the online docs? by Bombcar · · Score: 1

      The online docs have some fixes to the documentation, but there are a few chapters that are in the book that are not available online.

      Recommended. (And if you're lucky, you might be able to get a signature from JHT who is gallivanting around the countryside.....)

    7. Re:How does it compare to the online docs? by tulare · · Score: 3, Funny

      I bought a dead-tree version for one very simple reason: it perches on the back lid of a porcelin office-type chair known to contain liquids on a frequent or constant basis. Call it insurance. Here's my math:

      Loss of the dead-tree version should it fall in: US$50

      Loss of the laptop should it fall in: US$1400 plus hundreds of hours of lost productivity that went in as well.

      Kind of made the choice an easy one.

      --
      political_news.c: warning: comparison is always true due to limited range of data type
    8. Re:How does it compare to the online docs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      try Craftmatic if you really want an adjustable back for your bed. (I don't know why I'm advertising for them. They annoy the hell out of me with telemarketing calls.)

  4. same price and free shipping by zontroll · · Score: 1, Interesting
    1. Re:same price and free shipping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you really make any money from being an evil Slashdot spammer asshole? In looking at your recent postings, it seems that's all you do. How does it make you feel to abuse a public system, hurting everyone, for personal gain? Do you also shoplift?

    2. Re:same price and free shipping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how exactly does he hurt you? How is it abuse? I find it to be useful information as to how much the book costs at Amazon. If I want to thank him for the information, I click on his link when buying from Amazon. If I don't, I go straight to Amazon.

    3. Re:same price and free shipping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I find it to be useful information as to how much the book costs at Amazon.

      That's precisely why you should search through Amazon instead of encouraging inane referral-link spamming.

      By your logic, all of those "increase your penis length" and "take advantage of our low mortgage rate" emails are "useful information" too. Bet you'd love seeing those during *every* single book review too.

    4. Re:same price and free shipping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See, here it where your an idiot. The links he puts up are DIRECTLY related to the subject at hand. If Slashdot had an article on products which claimed to "increase your penis length" and then he posted links directly on this subject then YES it would be useful information.

      You sound like your just some asshole with a grudge against Amazon. Sorry your to dumb to understand how its useful to have people linking to sites which sell the actual products people are talking about in the article.

      In short YOUR the spammer here posting useless crap which doesn't relate to the subject at hand.

      Have a nice day. Dickhead.

    5. Re:same price and free shipping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Sorry your to dumb to understand how its useful...

      Jesus Christ, three grammatical errors in the space of seven words. Kill me now.

      And some people consider unsolicited advertising to be always bad; therefore it should always be opt-in.

    6. Re:same price and free shipping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you're reading /. at -1 (or even at 1 or 2), you're opting in.

    7. Re:same price and free shipping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > You sound like your just some asshole with a grudge against Amazon.

      I'm someone with a grudge against spam in general, whether related to the subject or not. You work for Company XYZ, doing Profession ABC. Should I now be allowed to send you thousands upon thousands of messages pertaining to ABC simply because, by choosing to work in that field, you've "opted in"?

      Incessant posting of referral links only floods the book reviews with people trying to get their grubby hands on a few dollars, and contributes nothing to the discussion of the topics or subject matter. But hey, your only motivation is getting that shiny nickel so badly, so my argument probably files over your head anyway. And these multi-syllabic words probably escape you too.

      Just because *you* post this shit, doesn't mean it smells any sweeter.

    8. Re:same price and free shipping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't worry about multi-syllabic words if everything "files" over my head anyway.

    9. Re:same price and free shipping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My grammar record fares far better than yours, if that's your measure of credibility. Need I tally your mistakes? There are far more errors in your parent post that my 1 typo.

      Don't worry, someone will click your link and give you that dollar which causes you many a wet dream.

    10. Re:same price and free shipping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      There are far more errors in your parent post that my 1 typo.

      <nelson>ha ha!</nelson>

    11. Re:same price and free shipping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      whether you believe it or not, I didn't post that earlier post with the typos. People other than me believe what I do is useful and proper and they support it, even if you are so virulently against it. Just because the guy doesn't check his grammar/spelling doesn't make his point any less valid.

    12. Re:same price and free shipping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Just because the guy doesn't check his grammar/spelling doesn't make his point any less valid.

      It doesn't, and I'm not the grammar nazi. Spam-boy, on the other hand, decided to make it an issue, instead of dealing with the "you spam because it nets you profit" accusation. It's a common tactic -- when you can't support your actions, build a nice straw man to attack. While most of us learned to avoid this just after we hit puberty, it's apparent that some people can't wrap their minds around the concept of a valid argument.

      Bark at him instead.

    13. Re:same price and free shipping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the hell are you talking about? The "spammer" defended his actions very well by saying it was useful information relevant to the topic. It's the "anti-spammer" who made a big deal out of the bad grammar of the guy defending the "spammer."

  5. To purchase... by GuardianBob420 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    First good looking proce I found was at Amazon, 39.99 + free shipping ...
    Looks cool, I'm gonna get it...

    1. Re:To purchase... by zontroll · · Score: 1

      what kind of crack are you smoking? At Amazon, It's 34.99, not 39.99.

    2. Re:To purchase... by GuardianBob420 · · Score: 1

      My bad, that crack was looking pretty good today, I couldn't resist it!

  6. I'll definitely get this by Space+cowboy · · Score: 1

    Samba is excellent, but the documentation leaves a little to be desired if you're not well up on the Windows platform. I'm sure all the Samba gurus will now disagree :-)

    Just a big thankyou to the Samba team as well - a truly excellent piece of software :-)

    Simon

    --
    Physicists get Hadrons!
    1. Re:I'll definitely get this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a real issue. If you're a Unix wonk trying to support a few Windows machines, there's a lot of assumption in the docs (dunno about this book, though) that you actually have a clue about how to configure the Windows side as well.

      Very frustrating. I know I had problems simply trying to get my W2K machine talking to my Solaris box.

  7. Does it tell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Does this book explain why Samba's WINS service does not work half of the time ir is slow to respond in most cases? Does it tell how to work around this problem?

    Does Samba 3 negate the problem that was so prevalent in Samba 2?

    1. Re:Does it tell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does this book explain why Samba's WINS service does not work half of the time ir is slow to respond in most cases?

      My guess is that it is just trying to emulate Microsoft's implementation.

  8. It can nerver replace.... by Chris_Stankowitz · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    SneakerNet!

    Viva La SnearkerNet!

    1. Re:It can nerver replace.... by Ianoo · · Score: 1

      Yeah... I recently upgraded my SneakerNet from 120kbps (1.44MB floppy, 30s to load on the data, 10s walk, 30s to copy it off again) to a staggering 50Mbps (256MB USB keyring dongle, 15s to load on the data, 10s walk, 15s to copy it off).

      Now it can nearly keep up with my WiFi!

    2. Re:It can nerver replace.... by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

      Never underestimate the bandwidth provided by a station wagon full of DVDs.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
  9. MO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  10. I like the part... by FreeLinux · · Score: 2, Insightful

    where the acquire, compile, install instructions are in the appendix. So many books on Linux and Linux apps usually waste several of the first few chapters on this. Happily, Linux an Linux app installation has improved to the point that any more than a paragraph or two on compiling and installation is a waste.

    1. Re:I like the part... by Ianoo · · Score: 1

      If you're using a distribution with a reasonable package manager (read: anything except Slackware) it shouldn't even be that difficult. Many distros come with it preinstalled these days anyway.

    2. Re:I like the part... by DCowern · · Score: 1

      If you're using a distribution with a reasonable package manager (read: anything except Slackware)

      Hey! I take offense to that! My laptop runs Slack and I have a wonderfule package system. It's kinda like gentoo. You just type the following commands in the following order:

      • wget $place_to_get_package_from
      • tar zxvf (or maybe jxvf) $package_name
      • cd
      • less README
      • less INSTALL
      • ./configure $with_build_flags
      • make
      • su
      • make install
      • exit
      • exit

      How much easier do you want them to make it? (tounge planted firmly in cheek) :-)

      On the other hand, I've never had slack corrupt and RPM database and render the system unusable... nor have I ever had errant installs leave behind piles of crap in some system "registry" that some day cause my system to b0rk. Plus any programs I install (plus the kernel, glibc, and gcc) are all configured and optimized for my specific machine. I don't know if it's the lack of extraneous crap compiled in or if it's the -march=, -O3, and other flags I throw in but the extra control in the build process seems to add a good deal of speed to the machine.

      Slack is the distro I run to when I get sick and tired of Mandrake's pretty menus and wizards not doing what I want them to. One day I'll probably become so curmudgeonly and jaded that it'll be all I use.

    3. Re:I like the part... by DCowern · · Score: 1

      Wow... I really need to start sleeping more... please note the following corrections to the above: wonderful is spelled wonderful, not wonderfule, the cd in my ul should be cd $package_directory, the and between corrupt and RPM should be an an, and the cause after some day should be causes.

      Five errors even after a preview... the slashcode team needs to add an "edit post" function for people like me. ;-)

  11. SEXUAL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  12. For those unable to buy it.... by geoff313 · · Score: 4, Informative

    While it is an excellent idea to financially support the Samba project, not only because of what they are doing but for how well they do it, but for those who are looking for who can't afford this book essentially the same document can be found here. Keep in mind this was the pre-release version of the published book. And I would just like to say thanks to the Samba team for all the excellent work they have done!!!

    1. Re:For those unable to buy it.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How can someone working in the technology field NOT afford books?

    2. Re:For those unable to buy it.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're new here, aren't you?

    3. Re:For those unable to buy it.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the hell are you talking man ? I belive you are an american who doesnt know anything about anyone else in this world. I am myself working in this field, but my salary is just enough to support my family. I almost exclusively depend on online docs and free documentations. Its not that, I dont want to support projects like samba, but I cant . And I am sure that there are so many like me , especially in thirld world countries.

    4. Re:For those unable to buy it.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. My userid number is fourteen. Again, how can someone in the technology field not afford a book?

    5. Re:For those unable to buy it.... by vlankhaar · · Score: 1

      It's not completely pre-release... I believe John and Jelmer merge errata directly into it, and certainly update it. And, it has today's date on it, to it really can't be _that_ old!

      Vance

    6. Re:For those unable to buy it.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just got promoted to US$9/hr.

      That PhD was worth it.

  13. Re:A hidden cost of open source? by skwirlmaster · · Score: 1

    Yeah, like the documentaion that comes with Windows is so wonderful that books aren't written to do the same things. Like the whole books for "Dummies" or the "Complete idiots guide to..." books didn't start with computer software. HA!

    The fact is that good documentation is hard to write, and no one likes doing it. That is why people write documentation for pay.

    --
    My inner self is ineffable, so don't eff with me.
  14. Re:A hidden cost of open source? by jaymz666 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Except that you also have to buy all sorts of books for say, Windows servers, Oracle, etc.

  15. MOD PARENT DOWN -1 UNDERSIZED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and tell him to start looking for "Penis Enlargement Pills" ad in his mail, he needs it.

  16. This is not a review by shaneb11716 · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's a copy/paste from the table of contents.

    But anyway, the problem I have with this book is that as you read about configuration in more detail as the book progresses, it sort of assumes you understand various MS networked file system concepts.

    I think the book could definitely use either an intro chapter or at least an appendix that discusses the core concepts of SMB first. Then I could make better decisions on deployment.

    -Shane

    --
    I love teh int4rw3b!!!!!111one1
  17. NFS? by mark_space2001 · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    This is kinda a funny coincidence. I was just looking yesterday for an easy, free solution to mounting NFS drives on windows. I have a small network at home and I don't want to go through the trouble of installing Samba on my server / NAT box, which runs Linux. I already export NFS mounts and I'd like to continue to use them.

    So does anyone know of an easy, free solution for NFS on Windows? All the ones I could find were comercial products. Emphasis on free, this is home and I just don't want to pay for the mimimal functionality I need.

    1. Re:NFS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is this offtopic? I as well would be interested in free solutions for NFS -- and the article clearly stated that this documentation is for windows users wanting to migrate to linux, so why not help a guy out and give opinions on free NFS mounting software for Windows?

      I swear this place is going to sheite.

    2. Re:NFS? by jbwolfe · · Score: 2, Informative

      This may not be what your after, but take a look here...
      http://www.microsoft.com/windows/sfu/unix proresour ces/
      Shipping will go about ten dollars, but the software is free.

      --
      Have you ever noticed that anybody driving slower than you is an idiot, and anyone going faster than you is a maniac?
    3. Re:NFS? by smartfart · · Score: 1
      #include standard.disclaimer.h

      I'm shooting from the hip here, so if I get this wrong, don't shoot me..

      First, set up your NFS as normal, between your *nix boxen. Once you have that, set up the exports you just mounted as samba shares. The windows boxen will be none the wiser.

    4. Re:NFS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Samba IS the easy, free solution.
      try the 2.x series...look at smbmount to mount windows filesystems.

    5. Re:NFS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      A couple of the preceding posts have given you the answer, but in case it isn't entirely obvious, here is a rephrasing.

      There is no particular value in having the Windows systems try to function as NFS clients. Instead, have them mount shares from a Samba server. That server, being a Unix system, can share any NFS filesystems it happens to mount. It's trivially easy.

    6. Re:NFS? by Cheetahfeathers · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Samba really is your easiest/fastest/most supported solution, for this case. It works well. We use it in our corporate enviornment. Mostly a Sun shop with NFS mounted home dirs and software shares and such, but there are windows folks out there that want the same home dir. We support many hundreds this way.

      The Samba section is pretty minimal to setup, for NFS. If you want printing and domains and such, it
      starts to get more complicated.

    7. Re:NFS? by mark_space2001 · · Score: 1
      Two big things dissuade me from using Samba. First is installaion. Step two right after download is "compile", and that tends to make it a non-trivial package to use.

      The other is the mere presence of the whole windows domain groupware print etc. stuff. Even if I don't use it, it's still in the executable, and I still have to read the documentation to make sure I have it disabled properly.

      Well, I've downloaded Samba, so we'll see how easy it if for me to compile, install and configure. Crossing my fingers....

    8. Re:NFS? by mark_space2001 · · Score: 1
      Well, that wasn't the worst ever experience of my life. But it was pretty close.

      FYI, samba is not the easiest solution for anything, ever, period. To many fucking configuration options. Maybe if you set up samba servers for a living, but I don't. NFS was simple enough that I could follow the HOW-TO and get it working, samba there's no hope, unless you want to talk me through the options.

      I think I'll try an ftp server and just browse it on windows. That sounds easy.

  18. Re:A hidden cost of open source? by ShaggyZet · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Yeah, Windows Help files include everything you could ever need. Most of the Windows developers and administrators I know have completely empty bookshelves in their offices. And I can't remember the last time I was in a bookstore that had a section on Windows Foo or Visual Bar++.

    Now come off it. Books are useful when they are more in depth than what is included with the software. MSDN (if that's what you're refering too) is good, but it's not the be all and end all of Windows Programming documentation. I'm not familiar enough with the Windows Admin side to know if there is even an equivelent.

    From a programming perspective, I generally find simple man pages to be much more in depth and up to date than MSDN or any other windows help files. And the many HOWTOs from LDP go even further.

  19. You got me. by FreeLinux · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I know this is a blatant troll but, for the sake of any newbies that might put credence in your statements, I must respond. The amount of documentation that comes with open source applications and the quality of said documentation varies depending on the application. Just as it does in the Microsoft world. There is almost always a man page and usually a readme file with the necessary documentation for most open source apps. These are usually far more detailed than the Windows Help or .chm files. Additionally, one can usually find a detailed online how-to for the desired application which is usually harder to find for Windows applications.

    Finally, if Windows documentation is so good, why are there so many books from Microsoft Press and third parties for so many Windows applications? Microsoft Exchange 2000 uses a .chm for its included documentation. It is incomplete, to say the least. That is why there are at least three very large books available from Microsoft Press on the subject and there are dozens of third party books that cover Exchange 2000. This is only one example but there are many many more. A casual stroll throught the Computer section of any book store clearly demonstrates this.

    The fact of the matter is that there definitely is a lot of free documentation for open source software and some is excellent. That does not mean that there shouldn't be third party books for it too though.

    Sorry for feeding the trolls.

    1. Re:You got me. by Malc · · Score: 1

      Your argument about the number of publications is flawed. If Linux or even UNIX were remotely as popular as Windows, and more importantly, as popular with computer illiterate people as Windows, I can guarantee there would be just as many Linux books. Personally I don't use much of the help that comes with Windows apps as it's either unrequired, or in the case of MSFT products, has an answer in MSDN.

      "There is almost always a man page and usually a readme file with the necessary documentation for most open source apps."

      Man page? When I'm not using Debian, I find a lot of modern man pages tell you to use info. Info pages SUCK big time. Besides the horrible interface (and I'm an Emacs user), all the ones I've had to deal with were poorly written and overly verbose. Try figuring out grub from the info pages. It's painful. Info pages are no better than the help that ships with a lot of Windows products.

    2. Re:You got me. by huckda · · Score: 1

      Agreeing to some degree, there is also a LOT of hella cryptic 'help files/man pages' in the 3 linux distros I've used. They assume a higher degree of knowledge than 95% of all windows users have, and rarely point at where to attain that knowledge other than jumping into the muck and getting your hands dirty...Many do not want to fiddle with this specific setting and that specific setting just to get a package to work. They want to run a little file like 'setup.exe' and poof have a nifty little walk through that says 'click next button' and poof it works!

      and if they DO need something special they want it written in ENGLISH,...,NOT techno-uber-linux-geek language...

      some of us have a basic knowledge and understanding of things and some man pages confuse the hell out of us because of how they are written/structured etc...

      --
      "Just Smile and Nod." --Huck
    3. Re:You got me. by cjjjer · · Score: 1

      That is why there are at least three very large books available from Microsoft Press on the subject and there are dozens of third party books that cover Exchange 2000.

      I think that this has more to do with the department in charge of all things Exchange. Take a look at the SQL Server BOL (Books OnLine). You will never find a better resource than this and it comes with SQL Server.

  20. Need more of the same by Ridgelift · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The book is written for people in the "Windows world" who want to take a look into the services and possibilities Samba offers for them.

    We need more books that help Windows users make the change to Linux. Although I probably wouldn't benefit from this book since I'm now used to reading the documentation myself, I would have appreciated such a text a few short years ago.

    Making the transition from Windows to Linux can be a lot like learning to ski. Windows is all about bunny hills, where you can learn to snow plow quickly and initially have some fun, but it gets boring fast. Linux, on the other hand, is like a full mountain without proper directions. Some people start with Linux and find the green runs and have fun. Others end up beginning on a double diamond run, and hate it because it was such a harrowing and confusing experience.

    Books like these help those bunny hill Windows users find the Linux green runs, and help them advance to the blue and black diamond aspects of Linux at a controlled pace.

    1. Re:Need more of the same by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft has it's own Double Diamonds, they are just make pretty with flags and stuff, but an inexpirenced admin, can muck things up real fast.

    2. Re:Need more of the same by Lord+Kholdan · · Score: 1

      We need more books that help Windows users make the change to Linux. Although I probably wouldn't benefit from this book since I'm now used to reading the documentation myself, I would have appreciated such a text a few short years ago.

      I don't think they'll help much. People that read documentation are few and far between. Those that actually buy those book are even more rare. Like it or not, Windows has taught people that you shouldn't need to read a manual to run anything and application is broken if you have to.

      Slick and easy UI is the way, not books that vast majority will never read.

  21. Oh goodie by Meor · · Score: 1

    Good thing we have only experts writing the HOWTOs. Now when newbies are trying to use samba they can read difficult language written by people who can't relate to simple end users, tied with a bunch of information we don't need! Thanks Linux community, this is so helpful :D

    1. Re:Oh goodie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Feel free to contribute a more readable one.

    2. Re:Oh goodie by vlankhaar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I would be very interested in seeing you write something like the HOWTO Collection. Yes, I'll admit, it was written by experts, but the language presented here is certainly not by any stretch of the imagination "difficult language."

      I think your comment about the authors being unable to relate to simple end uers is very unfair. John and Jelmer, and indeed all of the other contributors, do an amazing job relating to end users.

      Like a good open source project, this book was composed in such a way that input from _all_ users was greatly appreciated. If you feel that this document is useless, or if there is a section that you feel is hard to understand, by all means, do something about it. Write a new chapter, rewrite a section, add a section, do whatever is necessary. If you send your changes to John or Jelmer, I'm sure they will be merged into the next version of the book, and into the online version.

      Granted, I am no stranger to Samba and CIFS itself, but when going through this book, I read it with as much of a new user's perspective as possible, and found that it was very complete and very useful. There was no time in which I felt that a new user should feel overwhelmed by the information presented nor the manner in which this information was presented.

      Vance Lankhaar

  22. Why do we go through this every time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    BN, Amazon. You'd think they're the only games in town.

    <sigh>

    Try looking at addall.com, bestwebbuys.com, and bookpool.com; prices are $30.19, $33.52, and $31.50, respectively.

  23. One word... by cnelzie · · Score: 4, Interesting

    CALs.

    Extra words follow...

    For our small corporate network, I have determined that it would cost us nearly $40,000 USD (Just for the Software!) to maintain a Primary and Back-up Domain Controller using Microsoft Windows 2000. This includes both the Main Server License costs and the multiple packs of CALs required to allow each user access to the servers.

    Instead of that, we went with a Linux/Samba solution using the same hardware and saved... $40,000 in licensing costs. Sure, it took me a little longer to setup in the first place, of course my pay rate isn't even high enough to consider an issue in regards to choosing between Linux/Samba or Windows 2000 for our domain.

    From my reading, I can double and even triple the number of users with the current Samba system and see no additional license costs for CALs (or the time to calculate how many CALs we would need) or the need for upgrading the hardware.

    --
    If you ignore the other uses of a tool, does that make the tool less useful, or you less useful?
    1. Re:One word... by Malc · · Score: 1

      And if you leave, what will be the cost to the company finding a replacement who works in the MSFT world yet also understands Samba? You said it took you a while to setup, which makes it sound like it's not a regular config, or something straight out of the box - have you documented that? Or is that going to equate in to further training and maintenance costs to your replacement?

    2. Re:One word... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will Exchange, CRM, Project, and Solomon be compatiable with Samaba?

    3. Re:One word... by FatherOfONe · · Score: 1

      I use to work in a mixed NT and Samba network, (we have not migrated off of NT over to Linux), and to be honest after the setup, which did take a little longer to setup (2 days). It ran without a hitch. So I would say that to find a replacement for this guy would not be a problem because any technical guy (or gal) worth his or her salt could figure out Samba in around 2-3 days. The stuff just works.

      --
      The more I learn about science, the more my faith in God increases.
    4. Re:One word... by shyster · · Score: 1
      For our small corporate network, I have determined that it would cost us nearly $40,000 USD (Just for the Software!) to maintain a Primary and Back-up Domain Controller using Microsoft Windows 2000. This includes both the Main Server License costs and the multiple packs of CALs required to allow each user access to the servers.

      Since Windows 2000 Server with 25 CALs is about $1600, and additional 20 CAL packs are $670, it would seem to me that your "small corporate network" is somewhere around 1150 nodes. Even if you use per-server licensing mode, you'd still be able to purchase about 600 CALs for EACH server for $40,000. I think your small network ain't so small, or you miscalculated your prices. Oh, and note that one of MSFT's licensing programs would get you a cheaper license price as well, but I didn't take that into effect.

    5. Re:One word... by FatherOfONe · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Exchange, no. But most people don't run Exchange AND their file/print server on the same box. So you could piece-mail this, and still save a ton of money on CALs.

      CRM- Depends what package you use. Some yes some no. But remember not all CRM packages run on all versions of Windows either, and some require certain service packs, so again most people run their CRM services on a dedicated machine.

      Solomon??? Never heard of it.... Just did a Google search and found out that it is a MICROSOFT solution. SHOCKER!!! Do you work for Microsoft? Here is their info on the product.

      "Microsoft Business Solutions-Solomon(R) is a robust, flexible solution built to meet the needs of project-centric and distribution-driven companies. Its customization and integration tools help you adapt best practices, integrate with other systems, serve customers better, and excel in your industry. It also boosts employee efficiency by providing real-time data access through a Web-based interface. "

      Well after reading that I feel that I know a ton about it :-). Yep that was descriptive :-) God, how did I ever live without it. :-)

      I will bet that it doesn't run on Linux and that it never will, but you would have three options
      1. Use VMware and run it.
      2. Find a replacement for it that runs on more than one platform.
      3. Keep an NT server around just to run that app. (kinda like Exchange).

      The great thing about SAMBA is that it doesn't have to replace your ENTIRE NT network, it can co-exist well, and as a side benefit you get FREE CALS and a product that (for me) has worked great.

      You could be like us. Use it and save some money, then over time evaluate migrating off of Microsoft altogether. It took us around 2 years but we are now CAL free! Man I can't tell you how great it is not to have to worry about that.

      Lastly, how much does Exchange cost you per user? When we ran it, it was around $20/user.

      --
      The more I learn about science, the more my faith in God increases.
    6. Re:One word... by Malc · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I disagree. We are a 25 person company with an additional self-managed co-lo facility. It's in The Valley, and so with the current job market you would expect lots of good people around. It took us 5 months to find a good enough replacement for our network admin. He doesn't know Linux very well (although he's played with it), and certainly not Samba. Restricting ourselves further to candidates who also knew Samba would mean we would be still looking and I would still be providing network support rather than developing software. Furthermore, when you talk about 2-3 days to figure out Samba... what about the other projects and getting up to speed that they have to do? 2-3 days at just a few hours per day spreads out over weeks. I've played around with Samba prior to v3, and use it at home, but it took many hours, and I'm not convinced it's configured properly for a corporate environment - that would take a deeper understanding which requires time and experience.

      Incidentally, it seems there are a lot of UNIX and Oracle people looking for jobs (we got enough unrealistic applications from them) - I would suggest they get themselves an MSDN subscription or something if they want to bridge both worlds.

    7. Re:One word... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't tell Microsoft. They'll likely promise you an 8am visit the next day to review your other products and related CALS. It's a good thing for Microsoft migration from their products (as in setup & data files) isn't as fast as a premature ejaculator. Otherwise, every one of those "Oh, you didn't pick us over Linux? See you at 8am" visits would cost them a site migration. I cannot imagine why people permit them to be bullied by Microsoft.

    8. Re:One word... by FatherOfONe · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I disagree, we have a similar company and are based out of Indiana and I put out a job listing and had so many qualified resume's the next day I couldn't go through them all in a week. I began to wonder if they handed out MCSE's at Walmart. :-) I can find Linux guys who know windows and windows guys who are not so biased that they can learn SAMBA in way less than a week. I don't know how much you pay, but around here there is NO cost difference between an MCSE and a Linux/Windows guy.

      Again I have setup SAMBA now for quite a few organizations around town and have NEVER had an issue.

      When you mention that it is not configured for a corporate environment, I would disagree. I was part of a LAN team that worked on a 50k+ NT network and we used SAMBA a ton on our SUN boxes and it worked well. We had FAR FAR FAR FAR more problems with WINS on our Windows boxes than we EVER did with our SAMBA solutions.

      I want to make one point clear. Once the software is installed it runs. For 99% of the companies out there it never needs to be touched again (unless you want to). You would not need to spend 2-3 hours a week for every new project that comes up. I know because I run it. I have ran it and will continue to run it. I have ran it in 50k+ mixed networks and 5 user church networks.

      It's funny you mention UNIX and Oracle people looking for jobs, on our job posting we looked for exactly that and we got around 35% MCSE's and Microsoft Access guys. I was thinking the same thing but in reverse, :-) :-) (Mabe we should switch roles). I personally don't care if a developer,LAN Guy,DBA etc, doesn't know our specific technology. I look more for what they have shown on the job, and their ability to learn new stuff. I feel for all those poor saps that thought they would have a job forever doing Visual Basic, only to have Microsoft pull the plug on them. The good ones will show that they can learn something else. (I would suggest JAVA).... but that is me :-)

      --
      The more I learn about science, the more my faith in God increases.
    9. Re:One word... by jspectre · · Score: 1

      well. if the person with the MSFT can read, it will cost him the price of this book to get him up to speed on samba. if he can't, then hire someone else :-)

      --

      abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

    10. Re:One word... by arctuniol · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In order to set up 300 users for MSFT on my network it would have cost my company around $180,000. This is for exchange, the CAL's the microsoft guys to help set it up, and the hardware. Around 30 to 40 thousand of it was licensing costs.

      I did it with Samba, plus one extra guy to help, a full migration for about $25,000. Most of that was the extra helps salary. Let's see, that was 7 servers, two black box cabinets, two unmanaged switches, a cisco router, arcserve backup, and an 8 tape dlt 4 changer.

      I still have one NT box running old admin software and payroll software, but windows grabs the user info from samba.

      So the savings was oh about $140,000 give or take a few thousand for my personal toys that I snuck under the radar.

      Is one better then the other, who really knows. I think it really comes down to the core OS. Linux is more solid, the old MSFT boxes used to crash on a daily basis. My linux systems only one has gone down, and that was my email server.

      The only real concern isn't what is better, but the users get their data and they do it, without having to know what you are doing behind the scenes or if it is windows or linux, or unix, or POS AS400.

    11. Re:One word... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In all honesty, you don't just pick up Oracle during your lunch hour. If I was looking for someone to admin my Oracle databases, I'd want someone experienced. It's pretty crufty software, has a ton of options... it's a sprawling system. There are enough Oracle trained and certified people around that you shouldn't have to train your own new hire.

    12. Re:One word... by Malc · · Score: 1

      I guess the job market in Indiana must suck worse than San Jose. I don't think money was an option - we had applications with expectations ranging from $2K/mo (!!!!) to $120K/yr. Senior management didn't blink. I'm pretty sure the guy they hired is on 6 figures. He's good, and he's been fixing everything. I'm remote so I've never seen the infrastructure, but apparently it's a mess. Put that down to the previous guy knowing his stuff academically, but having no experience, and not being able to cope with a company that went from 5 to 55 to 20 to 25 and growing in the last 6 years. It seems experience counts for a lot more than reading. Or maybe we've just had a bad experience.

      I wasn't implying that Samba can't cope with a large corporate network. I was saying I'm not convinced that my setup at home is configured such that it would past muster in such an environment. I don't have enough experience with it to say - it *looks* right to me. It's pretty solid, but then so is the Debian installation it's running under (last four reboots forced by 2 power outages and 2 moves of apartment).

      We have problems with WINS to. I don't know if it's fundamental to WINS (it looks flakey to me), or the errors of the previous admin and too many multi-homed servers. It's irrelevant though as it will all replaced by AD at somepoint. I'm not sure how reverse DNS and netbios name resolution will work for me remotely yet, but I'm not that concerned either as I can always VPN to the office from my desktop if I have to rather than route through Linux box.

      Perhaps you know: it looks like Samba 3 final supports domain level trusts. Will this work against Active Directory, or will the AD have to run in mixed mode or something?

    13. Re:One word... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Actually Solomon is a modular financial system that was developed by a company called Solomon Software (holy shit that was unexpected), which was them bought out by Great Plains (another company that did the same), which was recently bought out by Microsoft.

      Locally we run a Windows 2000 AD, with Exchange 2003, Microsoft CRM, and Solomon 5.5, it all works together as one package, something that you just don't see on Linux.

      Yes Exchange averages out at about $20, but it's intergrations with CRM, and Solomon (using CRM), more than makes up for it's cost over a Linux solution.

      But the answer my questions is no, in order to get the true advantage out of Microsoft products in the Enterprise (their intergration), you have to be running an actual Windows domain.

    14. Re:One word... by shyster · · Score: 1
      In order to set up 300 users for MSFT on my network it would have cost my company around $180,000. This is for exchange, the CAL's the microsoft guys to help set it up, and the hardware. Around 30 to 40 thousand of it was licensing costs.
      With Exchange, 300 users and 7 servers, I'd say the licensing costs on that sounds close. If I had to guess though, I'd put it closer to $50,000 (with 2 Exchange servers). But, I haven't taken the time to price it out, so we'll use your numbers.

      I did it with Samba, plus one extra guy to help, a full migration for about $25,000. Most of that was the extra helps salary. Let's see, that was 7 servers, two black box cabinets, two unmanaged switches, a cisco router, arcserve backup, and an 8 tape dlt 4 changer.

      Well, since you state that the migration cost you $25,000, most of which was salary...let's assume $10,000 was for HW (a split of 60/40 in salary/hadrware costs). Going back to your $180,000 quote, with the $40,000 in MSFT licensing, and the $10,000 in hardware gives you $130,000 in salary "for the Microsoft guys to help set it up"? That's a crapload of help....Let's see, that's about FOUR months of TWO full-time (40 hours per week) consultants (at $100/hour). You either have one wack job of a setup to migrate, are completely clueless on Windows and need extensive training, or are mistaken on your $$ costs.

      Oh yeah, and you didn't get Exchange, or I assume, an equivalent groupware solution.

      Of course, in the end, you do have a solution which you're comfortable with. And that is important. An admin needs to be comfortable with the systems he's administrating. And I don't expect you to set yourself up out of a job. However, let's be honest when discussing the costs of MSFT...at least with each other. You can tell the PHB's whatever you want.

    15. Re:One word... by FatherOfONe · · Score: 1

      If I need fires put out then I would hire a contractor. To use your type of thinking if we switch off of Linux to XYZ I would then fire all my Linux guys and hire XYZ guys.

      Yes I know you can't learn Oracle in 24 hours :-) But if you give me someone who knows relational database like DB2 and has shown the ability to learn new things then that is a better long term employee for our company. Now in todays market I can find someone who fits both.

      --
      The more I learn about science, the more my faith in God increases.
    16. Re:One word... by FatherOfONe · · Score: 1

      Man I may need to move to San Jose. We get average LAN guys here for around $40k. Top guys get around $75k. But I imagine the cost of living is a little more out there. I also bet the wheather is a lot better :-)

      Our economy here sucks big time. Indiana is a manufacturing state and specifically automotive. It has been hard here. That coupled with the fact our former Govenor was incompetent has hurt us a lot.

      Samba 3 will hook in to Active Directory (haven't done it yet, because we are all Linux now), BUT I have heard that is uses an LDAP connection to AD. From what I have read Samba 3 can now be a backup domain controller and also participate in trust relationships.

      Good luck and give it a try. It won't hurt anything if you set it to not participate in browser elections. That was just a brilliant design on Microsoft's part. I have seen browser elections take down many a large switched networks. They suck big time. Especially if you have multiple protocols like ipx and netbui installed, and before everyone blast me... yes I know about the registry setting to turn that off.

      --
      The more I learn about science, the more my faith in God increases.
  24. Re:Terpstra, Vernooij by Apostata · · Score: 1

    A name, say, like "Anonymous Coward"?

    (if it's not Dutch, it's not much)

    --

    This wasn't just plain terrible, this was fancy terrible. This was terrible with raisins in it. - Dorothy Parker
  25. This Book is Under an Open Source License by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 2, Informative
    The book is under an Open Source license, as are all titles in Bruce Perens' Open Source Series, and the remaining 5 chapters that aren't already checked into Samba CVS will be there soon. Unencrypted PDF will also be made available.

    Thanks

    Bruce

    1. Re:This Book is Under an Open Source License by JShadow · · Score: 0


      Excellent, Open Source continues to share the wealth of human knowledge...as it should be.

    2. Re:This Book is Under an Open Source License by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, how can I read "Intrusion Detection with SNORT (Bruce Perens' Open Source Series): Advanced IDS Techniques Using Snort, Apache, MySQL, PHP, and ACID" on the web?

  26. Remember folks... by JShadow · · Score: 1, Interesting

    This is a book primarily for WINDOWS users looking to migrate to a Samba server. As a windows user myself, the HOWTO on the web is REALLY helpfull to me as I get SAMBA up and running with my MS network, so I'm sure the book will be just as helpful, perhaps even more. :)

    Also, I'm glad to see the HOWTO come out in book form, since sometimes it's really handy to have the book there in front of you while you're pounding away at the config.

  27. Re:A hidden cost of open source? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reread what they said. They said it's not like the Windows and Windows-related products are documented and Dummies and Complete Idiots Guide books aren't needed. Were vendors to produce decent documentatioon, those books would be worthless.

    And that's why the reader was saying it's a hidden cost of "free" software - if you buy books|documentation, then it's not free.

  28. It is the online doc by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 4, Informative
    As good citizens of the Open Source developer community, the authors and editiors in Bruce Perens' Open Source Series place the text of their books under Open Source licenses. We think that Open Source software deserves Open Source documentation. As a result, you can already get all but 5 chapters of this book online from the Samba project, and the remaining 5 will eventually be there too. Most people buy paper because it's hard to curl up with an e-book. That seems to be working for this title, we are already in the second printing. But if you want to read it online, you are welcome to.

    Thanks

    Bruce

    1. Re:It is the online doc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, I wish I could have my own book series as well...

      How to be a Twit in Three Lines of Text - part of the Anonymous Coward Series.
    2. Re:It is the online doc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey dumbass, that really _is_ Wil Wheaton.

      oh wait...

    3. Re:It is the online doc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now if you would just renounce HP for laying off thousands will spending millions on exectoys. You could also renounce for their use of labor in China.

      But that will not make you any money, so you won't.

    4. Re:It is the online doc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You see? It's this attitude that makes me glad to whip out my wallet and buy something that I know I don't *have* to pay for. My money goes to support those people with a good open source vision of the future, rather than a greedy IP hoarding mentality.

    5. Re:It is the online doc by ssstraub · · Score: 1

      You know, I think you're on to something here. I'm also the type of person that is so sick of greedy companies and their bloodthirsty ways, that I'd be more likely to pay for this freely obtainable product, than a non-free product.

      Plus samba is great!

  29. Remember! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't need books to have sex with your mare.

    1. Re:Remember! by freeze128 · · Score: 0, Troll

      I hope to *NEVER* have sex with a mare.

  30. I got this book. by DrEldarion · · Score: 0

    ... and was very disapointed. I mean, it had all this stuff about those new-fangled computers in it. What on earth do computers know about Samba dancing? Seriously! I want my money back.

  31. Available Online by deacon_jay · · Score: 3, Informative
    I just went through a new Samba install and this documentation was a great help.
    It's all available online from samba.org:
    HTML Version | PDF Version
    Note: There are a couple of chapters that are missing from these versions but all-in-all it should answer most of your questions.
  32. Re:A hidden cost of open source? by freeze128 · · Score: 1
    The fact is that good documentation is hard to write, and no one likes doing it. That is why people write documentation for pay.
    *GOOD* documentation is hard to write, but it seems that the truth is that *DEVELOPERS* don't like to do it. They have already written a fantastic (or spectacularly bug ridden) piece of code, and the added work of writing documentation seems superfluous. Unfortunately, there are few others who are qualified to write documentation who would know the software as well as the delveloper. (At that time). This could be why it sometimes takes YEARS before there is good documentation - it takes that long for someone willing to write the DOCS to learn the software.
  33. Re:A hidden cost of open source? by KlomDark · · Score: 1

    Bullcrap, there are a few of us weirdos who like writing documentation... It's still hard work, and I prefer to get paid for it, but...

    See my Top 100 list for most of my documentation...

  34. Nice timing by gregmac · · Score: 1

    As I was just finishing up a major project I've been working on for the past few months, I decided it's about time to look into moving my NT4 PDC to Samba, which I've been intending to do for a year. Just last night I was looking at samba.org, and saw this book, and was wondering if it was worth buying ;)

    --
    Speak before you think
  35. Free Book? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Is there a free version of this? Or is it just Man pages for poor admins?

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  36. user passwords? by Squeezer · · Score: 1

    My only thing is I wanna know how to transfer the windows login account's passwords to samba. there seems to be no way to do this. all you can do is set all user accounts on the linux server to a default password and let all your users know. sucks balls when you have to migrate hundreds of users.

    --
    Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?
    1. Re:user passwords? by jdoff · · Score: 2, Informative

      pwdump does this:

      http://us1.samba.org/samba/ftp/pwdump/

      See the comments in pwdump.c.

    2. Re:user passwords? by vlankhaar · · Score: 1

      If you currently have your "hundreds of users" on an NT domain, than indeed what you want to do is possible. Try reading the migrating from nt pdc chapter... That is exactly what it sounds like you're looking. Vance Lankhaar

  37. Computer browsing problem in Samba 3.0 by tiger_omega · · Score: 0

    As being on the subject of Samba 3.0

    Couple of weeks back I was trying to get Samba 3.0 to run as a simple PDC for my home network. However the computers on the network were not visible in the network neighbourhood.

    The network shares were available and browseable, by manually typing them in the path to the computer. i.e. "\\computer_name".

    Now I have read through all the available documentation and went through a number of mailing lists trying to find a solution. Also tried all the possible configuration settings relating to browsing and WINS server trying to resolve the problem but with no success.

    Eventually went back to Samba 2.2 for running the PDC and its working fine.

    So was wondering has anyone else had this problem or know the solution for it?

    1. Re:Computer browsing problem in Samba 3.0 by binary+paladin · · Score: 1

      Interesting. I'm having a similar problem. I have Samba installed on my Linux box and with 2.2 I could type "smb://" into the location bar on my file manager and see the workgroups on my network and the computers in my workgroup.

      Since jumping to 3.0 I can still hit those shares if I know the computer name, but I can't see the workgroups or browse by workgroup anymore. I haven't bothered fixing the problem or really looking into it yet since the shares I use 95% are mounted anyway.

  38. Overstock.com is a godsend... by beatbox32 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Overstock.com. $28.79 USD... nice, real nice.

    --
    "The purpose of learning is growth, and our minds, unlike our bodies, can continue growing as long as we live." - M.J. A
    1. Re:Overstock.com is a godsend... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why I keep railing against the maroons[1] who post the prices of Amazon & BN, as though they're the only stores in town.

      I think Slashdot needs an autopost utility to remind people to check addall.com, bookpool.com, and bestwebbuys.com - shopping bots (which will pick up overstock.com) as soon as someone mentions Amazon or BN in a post about books.

  39. Cry for help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm posting this as an anonymous coward because I'm just too ashamed. I don't know about other /. readers but I've been a strict Linux, Openbsd and Solaris user for as long as I can remember. I know next to nothing about Windows NT/2K administration or networking. Can someone please suggest a book or a couple of books which shed some light on administering and networking with Windows workstations and servers? And I mean _everything_ WINS, netbios, netbeui, netwhatever, master domain controller *huh?*. I know I can search Amazon but I would rather hear comments from users who have read these books and what they did or did not like about said books. Thanks!

  40. Free chapter by prostoalex · · Score: 1

    Chapter 3, Server Types and Security Modes, is available online for free.

  41. Never ceases to amaze me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People jump on the Linux bandwagon because it's "more secure" or "more stable" or "faster", yet with analogies like these, I can understand why. So, in other words, what you're saying it you're one of those moron admins the penguin-heads are always laughing at? The kind of guy who knows where to clickity-click to restart IIS, and that's it? No idea how to SECURE IIS or change registry parameters to make it faster, or even know what the metabase is and it's purpose. There's a lot more to Windows than just what you see on the screen, little bunny, perhaps you should come back and take a look at the back side of the Windows mountain. Oh, and BTW, you don't need the source to get to it.

    1. Re:Never ceases to amaze me... by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1


      So, in other words, what you're saying it you're one of those moron admins the penguin-heads are always laughing at? The kind of guy who knows where to clickity-click to restart IIS, and that's it? No idea how to SECURE IIS or change registry parameters to make it faster, or even know what the metabase is and it's purpose. There's a lot more to Windows than just what you see on the screen, little bunny, perhaps you should come back and take a look at the back side of the Windows mountain.


      Its kind of amusing to read rants like this right next to this post in the same thread.
    2. Re:Never ceases to amaze me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ahhhh, yes...the IIS "metabase" (it's a goddamn database ppl...a glorified gloryhole of a httpd.conf)

      another microsoft gem.

      and you claim you can edit the registry?

      i'm breathless.

      please do continue! i must know more?

      (really, please don't...i've been an admin and mcse since 1996...and if you can't admit to yourself that as a whole, most MS techs aren't worth a shit, then you'll never make it)

  42. Interesting timing coincidence by jht · · Score: 1

    John spoke last night at my user group (BNUG meeting, on Open Source software in general and on Samba's development process and features. He was a quite informative and interesting speaker, and folks picked up a few copies of the book at the meeting.

    Though the entire book is available online (minus a few chapters that will soon be put in), I think it's worthy to support authors and publishers who put information out there for free access. I've got my copy of the book on order (would have picked it up last night, but I was short on cash), and given the amount of use I've gotten out of Samba in my work over the years I consider it to be a worthy investment.

    --
    -- Josh Turiel
    "2. Do not eat iPod Shuffle."
  43. John will be at SCALE by irabinovitch · · Score: 1

    John Terpstra, the author of this book, will be at SCALE 2003 doing a book signing. He will also be giving two talks: -Samba-3: Integration and Migration Options -FLOSS: No Roadblocks Ahead If you want to meet John at SCALE you can get a free exhibit hall pass by pre-registering on the SCALE website with the promo code "free". Those who want to hear his talks can use the promo code: "invtd" for a discount.

  44. Safe to use samba 3? by iantri · · Score: 1

    I've been wanting to set up a PDC with Samba but have discovered that 2.2.8 is a bit limited (i.e. no NT Users and Groups aside from "Domain Users" and "Domain Admins").. is it safe to upgrade to Samba 3 yet? Is it reliable?

    1. Re:Safe to use samba 3? by Bombcar · · Score: 1

      Samba 3.0 has been in production use by some brave people for over half a year.

      The 3.0.0 release was very good; the only major annoyance/bug is one dealing with Microsoft Office renaming files.

      See this post for some detail.

      There is a patch available that fixes that issue.

      I'm running 3.0 and it works fine (but not so sure about 3.0.1pre2....)

  45. Free for all who want it: by Thud457 · · Score: 1
    The complete text of "*BSD for total morons":

    "You're too hopeless to even RTFM, go install Windoze."

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  46. Doh! by theMerovingian · · Score: 0

    My first slashdot post is a flamebait... (diminished self-esteem)

    There are two main advantages to M$ that I see, both as a consultant and as a small company.

    Consultant hat: You don't have to explain *nix to clients. They want computers to provide solutions to their problems, and they don't want to do/learn anything new.

    Small Business hat: It is easy to build and administer Windows server. You can even build your SQL server relationships in Visio now. It doesn't require much knowledge or effort to configure a workable solution. Not the most high performance or secure solution, but good enough to get the job done.

    That being said, if samba allows 30 simultaneous users doing much of anything on a 266mhz box (see previous post), then I can see some real value.

    --
    "If you think you have things under control, you're not going fast enough." --Mario Andretti
  47. O'Reilly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have to favor the O'Reilly Book in this case.

  48. Already taken care of! by cnelzie · · Score: 1

    There is a local company that supports Linux systems exclusively. In fact, we have used them in the past to handle a few of our minor areas that I hadn't the time to learn/configure myself.

    If soemthing happens to me, they are available to take over administration of the network at a rather inexpensive cost.

    As for documentation, it is my life's blood. If I didn't document anything, how would I be able to fix, restore things after a catastrophic event?

    Do you have anything else to add?

    --
    If you ignore the other uses of a tool, does that make the tool less useful, or you less useful?
  49. Ask and ye shall receive... by Soulfader · · Score: 2, Informative
    Linux for Windows Administrators, 2nd Ed by Mark Minasi is probably a fairly close fit. It helped me over some very rough spots in my home network migration. Mr. Minasi is something of an authority in the NT world--his Windows 2000 series is also excellent.

    Only downside is that it's getting a little dated--how about a 3rd edition, Mark? =)

  50. Re:Terpstra, Vernooij by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Terpstra isn't really Dutch.
    It more sounds Frisian to me.
    A minority languange close to
    old english, before the Norman/French
    invasion)
    (Those Anglo-Saxons that did not invade
    England in the 5th century ;-) )

    - Terp: artificial elevated land in wet environment
    - Stra: inhabitant

    Groeten !

  51. Re:Terpstra, Vernooij by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey dude,

    did you know yankee was derived from middle
    dutch: Jan Kees.
    In english one would say Joe Cheese.

    The dutch have something with cheese ...

    Regards

  52. Re:A hidden cost of open source? by Demonspawn · · Score: 1

    Why do you need documentation when you have the source?

    The source is free.

    So, basically, you're telling me that because you can't understand source code, or perhaps you can but are too lazy to read it and perfer a summary, that your need of summary information is a 'hidden cost' while you have full, complete, and total documention provided to you via the GPL?

    --Demonspawn

  53. John Terpstra at SCALE by MrMorph · · Score: 1

    John Terpstra, co-founder of the Samba-Team, will be speaking at the Southern California Linux Expo on November 22nd at the Los Angeles Convention Center in Los Angeles, California. John will be giving an overview of Samba 3 including the ability to integrate into an Active Directory enviroment. Autographed copies of "The Official Samba 3 Howto and Reference Guide" will be available for purchase. Regular priced and student priced tickets giving full access to the event are still available. Free expo only tickets are also available using the "FREE" promotional code on the orders page. The Southern California Linux Expo is a non-profit event organized by LUG volunteers.

  54. Samba rocks. by unsigned+integer · · Score: 1

    I took my FreeBSD 5.1 box, installed Samba. Set it up as a PDC, joined my XP box to the domain, setup roaming profiles for the couple of users and shared them out. Next, I setup CUPS and setup/shared my HP printer, and installed the drivers so that Windows machines can 'double-click' on the printer and have it setup right away for them. CUPS + Samba seem to integrate pretty well, and it took the mess out of hand crafting the printcap file and samba printer definitions. "printing = cups" and I'm done with it.

    In a few hours, I had created basically what 98% of my clients use their current Windows File/Domain/Print servers for ...

    Now I have to look and see if Samba has any Group Policy support for enforcing restrictions on the client machines. That, and integrating the authentication into a LDAP server for one-stop authentication.

  55. Compilling NFS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi Mark.
    You don't mention which distribution you're using but you shouldn't have to compile it on your own.

    In Mandrake you issue "urpmi samba-server", in RedHat you probably say "rpm -i samba-server", in Debian perhaps "apt-get samba-server" and in Slackware maybe "pkg_add samba". That should give you a reasonably sane samba-install.

    The only thing to change then is
    security=user in /etc/samba/smb.conf (or maybe /etc/smb.conf) and restart smbd and nmbd.
    The other thing that might be an issue is weather to use encrypted passwords or not. The easiest is to do that, and then you have to run "smbpasswd -a your-user-name" and enter a password.

    You normally don't need to tweak any other options in a vendor distributed package.

    Peder

  56. Oops! I suppose that I should... by cnelzie · · Score: 1

    ...have taken into account that the prices were going to drop, after the release of the newer Windows Server 2003, when I performed my initial analysis almost two years ago...

    Darn, by today's numbers it looks like I only saved nearly $6,000. Wait a minute... you are telling me that as I add more users, I will have to spend more money, even though the OS and hardware can handle the extra load already?

    So to add 20 more users, I would be spending an extra $670 dollars? So... If I were to add 200 users, I would be spening an additional $6,700, just on the CALs for the one server? (You know that you need to have CALs for EACH potential user that can access EACH server at any given time?)

    So... To handle 200 users, I would, or should have ONE PDC, at least TWO BDCs and likely one or two fileservers, each of which would need at least 200 CALs. (Unless MS cahnged the licensing recently, which I doubt.)

    Let's add this up, shall we? (To make it more 'fair' we will go with 1 file server from the above mix...)

    4 Windows 2000 Server w/ 25 CALs $6400

    9 - 20 CAL packs per server (4) $24,120

    WOW! We are already over $30,000

    Let's see what else would be needed...

    Ahh... email... How much is Exchange Server these days? Oh wait, I would need to add another TWO servers to the mix to have the redundancy and also keep Exchange up and running with no issues... (Slowdowns or otherwise)

    Now, we are looking at maintaining at least 6 Microsoft Windows 2000 Servers to have a redundant and high-availability network. Of course, now we should have two admins, just for monitoring/maintaining the servers as well as to provide tech support assistance. Our electricity costs have increased, our hardware costs have risen.

    I see no cost benefit in going the Microsoft Way.

    --
    If you ignore the other uses of a tool, does that make the tool less useful, or you less useful?
    1. Re:Oops! I suppose that I should... by shyster · · Score: 1
      Oh boy, this should be fun....Are you sure you performed an "analysis" on this?

      First off, you started your story thusly:

      For our small corporate network, I have determined that it would cost us nearly $40,000 USD (Just for the Software!) to maintain a Primary and Back-up Domain Controller using Microsoft Windows 2000. This includes both the Main Server License costs and the multiple packs of CALs required to allow each user access to the servers.

      in which you quote $40,000 in licensing costs for 2 Windows 2000 Servers and a "small corporate network". I then preceded to show that as completely and utterly ridiculous. You then decided that you'd like to change your network to:

      To handle 200 users, I would, or should have ONE PDC, at least TWO BDCs and likely one or two fileservers, each of which would need at least 200 CALs. (Unless MS changed the licensing recently, which I doubt.) Let's add this up, shall we? (To make it more 'fair' we will go with 1 file server from the above mix...) 4 Windows 2000 Server w/ 25 CALs $6400 9 - 20 CAL packs per server (4) $24,120 WOW! We are already over $30,000

      where you still come up $10,000 short of your original quote, despite transforming from a "small corporate network" with 2 servers, into a 200 user network with 4 servers.

      Secondly, you've evidently never heard or bothered to look up per server and per seat licensing modes, despite the quite obvious choice Windows gives you when you add licenses or set up a new server. If you had known this, you could've saved over $20,000 just on the CAL add packs.

      But, you decided that it was better to dig to the bottom than jump out now. So, you proceed to demonstrate your complete and total ignorance of MSFT's licensing model when you stated:

      each of [the 4 servers] which would need at least 200 CALs...[and]...You know that you need to have CALs for EACH potential user that can access EACH server at any given time?
      which, once again, shows you have no concept of per seat licensing mode and when it's advantageous to use it. You also, evidently, have confused concurrent users with your "potential" users.

      As a coup de grace, in case anyone doubted your ineptness with MS products, you state that:

      we should have two admins, just for monitoring/maintaining the servers as well as to provide tech support assistance.

      for 6 servers, 2 of which are BDC's (which, BTW, don't exist in Windows 2000 Server or AD, but I digress), and 1 of which is a simple file server.

      After this less than stellar performance, I'd suggest you call someone a bit more familiar with MS products next time, check out one of MS's licensing webinars, avoid doing cost comparisons altogether, or getting a job with Enron's accounting department or the Gartner Group-where your math and research skills will fit right in.

      Oh, and BTW, I never stated there was a cost benefit. Obviously, comparing the CAL prices of a free(beer) Linux and SAMBA distro with Windows would never show a cost benefit in MS's direction. I only ask that you if you're going to discuss licensing costs that you know what the hell you're talking about, instead of enveloping the rest of /. with your cloud of FUD and confusion.

    2. Re:Oops! I suppose that I should... by shyster · · Score: 1
      Since I may have been overly harsh in my previous reply, I decided to do the legwork for you and price out your license requirements.

      For 6 Windows 2003 Servers, 2 Exchange 2003 Servers and 200 CALs to Windows Server ad Exchange Server, it'd be $24,294 under the Open License Program without Software Assurance, but including docs and CD's.

      $15,828 of this is for the Exchange 2003 side, which you didn't include in your $30,000 quote. To pit apples vs. apples, your $30,000 quote for 4 servers with 200 CALs just got reduced to $8,466.

      Now, admittedly, Red Hat Enterprise ES Standard for 4 servers would only be $3200, but, like I said, let's make sure we know what we're talking about when we throw numbers out. ;-)

  57. Re:A hidden cost of open source? by jaymz666 · · Score: 1

    Writing good documentation is never superfluous. It requires patience, a certain distance from what you are documenting so as to avoid bias and alienation of new users.