If Pandora pays $1M upfront to a label company to stream their library and then additionally pays $0.001 to the artist/stream and Spotify pays nothing to a label company but pays $0.006 to the label company who then gives 1% to the artist, then which approach gets the artist more money?
We already seem to have support from the NDP, but a stronger support wouldn't hurt. If you are Canadian, please sign this: https://openmedia.org/SpyOnUs
Not everyone wants a TV this huge, not everyone uses "channels" anymore (this is Slashdot, you should have dropped cable/satellite years ago and be using an AppleTV/FireTV/etc by now), headphones/external speakers are usually better than the low-fi audio in a thin TV set and you don't need a TV remote without built-inchannels/built-in audio, you use the remote of your set-top box instead.
There's always the Uzebox. It may be a lot less powerful, but it's open source, anyone can code for it and anyone can build one at home at a very low cost.
If you want fucking songs, there's always youporn and redtube although I wouldn't exactly call the audio "songs".
Robbing a bank.
Or green-painted coal.
The greenest "Mac" computer you can have is a hackintosh PC tower in which you can replace components one by one.
Yeah sure, paint them green if you want, they're yours.
I'd like to move into the Paradise Matrix, pretty please.
*Not checked
FTFY
Don't forget your incredible victory against drugs!
"Because Apple has a trademark on squares with rounded corners?" /duck
We already seem to have support from the NDP, but a stronger support wouldn't hurt. If you are Canadian, please sign this: https://openmedia.org/SpyOnUs
Not everyone wants a TV this huge, not everyone uses "channels" anymore (this is Slashdot, you should have dropped cable/satellite years ago and be using an AppleTV/FireTV/etc by now), headphones/external speakers are usually better than the low-fi audio in a thin TV set and you don't need a TV remote without built-inchannels/built-in audio, you use the remote of your set-top box instead.
You don't have an external box for that?
There's always the Uzebox. It may be a lot less powerful, but it's open source, anyone can code for it and anyone can build one at home at a very low cost.
Great, no support for Mac and Linux. Again.
You can already buy a regular, not-smart TV everywhere. It's called a computer monitor.
Blue! No! Yelloooooooooooooooooooooooow!
Care to explain your unique business instead of just being vague? Do you have a website?
Oh, aspergers are good with butter.
10 print "58008"
20 rotatescreen 180
What if the answer if "no sugary drinks of any kind"? Does that destroy your little pre-conceived world where everyone fits inside neat little boxes?
Oh yeah, can't wait for that.
(insert Futurama's "Don't Date Robots" propaganda video here)
http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/L...épisodes_de_Il_était_une_fois..._l'Espace#Le_long_voyage
Yeah sure, whatever. Just re-modulate the shields frequency and we're good to go.
My ears are so good that I can tell if the bits of a music file are coming from magnetic drive, optical disc or flash storage.