Slashdot Mirror


User: SEWilco

SEWilco's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
5,473
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 5,473

  1. Re:Reduce by 8% or do nothing? on 'No Quick Fix' From Nuclear Power · · Score: 1

    You haven't connected the power-consuming decisions by individuals to the amount of power being generated. Blackouts would have notable structural and political downsides.

  2. Reverse Precautionary Principle on 'No Quick Fix' From Nuclear Power · · Score: 1

    Is this a reversed Precautionary Principle? Rather than "avoid an action because it might be dangerous", they're saying it would require becoming a leader in low-carbon technologies, or "avoid this action and take a different action despite not knowing how to do it".

  3. Re:Good to see common sense on 'No Quick Fix' From Nuclear Power · · Score: 1
    we will only have 10,000 years until the waste we create today will be even approachable

    So the UK is not approachable? Or how far do you think you live from one of the dozen nuclear sites in the UK? Someone is approaching within 10 miles of those sites.

  4. Re:Quick Fix, Instant-Oatmeal One-Hour photo answe on 'No Quick Fix' From Nuclear Power · · Score: 1

    One-Hour Photo? What is that, a place where it takes an hour to select a digital camera?
    Check your assumptions.

  5. Reduce by 8% or do nothing? on 'No Quick Fix' From Nuclear Power · · Score: 1
    From the article: "Research by the SDC suggests that even if the UK's existing nuclear capacity was doubled, it would only provide an 8% cut on CO2 emissions by 2035 (and nothing before 2010)."

    So if the nuclear capacity was doubled, it would indeed cut CO2 emissions. What if it were quadrupled? Increased tenfold? (There are 12 operational reactor sites, each with multiple nuclear units)

    With this added nuclear power, CO2 emissions may be reduced 8% by 2035. And there is a forecast that the UK will exceed by 8% its 2010 goal.

    So is it better to reduce CO2 emissions or not? Does the study mention how much radioactive material must be released by coal plants in order to equal the power which could be created by nuclear plants?

  6. Re:Other Advantages on Playing the World From a Basement · · Score: 1
    Concert attendees didn't have to pay $5 to get a beer from the fridge.

    Depends on the contract for the concert.

  7. Re:I don't know... on Playing the World From a Basement · · Score: 1
    wow, so many camera phones/recording devices...

    Don't point your phone at your computer screen, nobody wants this performance to end up on the Net.

  8. Re:For God's sake on What Corporate Email Limits Do You Have? · · Score: 1
    "/me signals for me droogs to come drag thee out of the room as an example."

    /me stops using email.

  9. (unintelligible) joke on Rockstar's Family-Friendly Shocker · · Score: 1

    ... unfortunately the translation service for Ozzy's running commentary will cost $29.99 a month.

  10. Re:Easy, To Do on U of Wisconsin's Mac OS X Security Challenge · · Score: 5, Funny
    "...dog/pet/loved is shoot, dead"

    • We're talking about a nerd. In Wisconsin.
    • You can't hack your own web page in 2 minutes after your computer has been shot dead.
  11. Who's ready? on OSS Election Systems Desired, but Not Ready · · Score: 5, Insightful
    "... open source may not be ready for the polls."

    Is closed source ready for the polls?

  12. Re:Frist post on NJ Bill Would Prohibit Anonymous Posts on Forums · · Score: 1

    It's more entertaining for some of us to post non-anonymously. Readers from New Jersey might only get to see the odd discussion resulting from the anons being filtered out.

  13. Why "vs Cisco"? on Open-Source Router to Take on Cisco? · · Score: 1

    Why is the headline "vs Cisco"? Cisco could also produce products based on this technology.

  14. Re:For God's sake on What Corporate Email Limits Do You Have? · · Score: 1
    "Email is not a filesystem".

    "Excuse me, but what is a filesystem? I only use documents and folders."

  15. Re:Frist post on NJ Bill Would Prohibit Anonymous Posts on Forums · · Score: 5, Funny

    Void where prohibited by law.

  16. Oh, no! on New AT&T Acquires BellSouth · · Score: 2, Funny

    Say it ain't so, Ma!

  17. Re:Even worse, this is almost a dupe on CNET Accuses Apple of Over-Hyping Launch · · Score: 1

    Paraphrasing everything said in /. would get one fired.

  18. Re:Why not just use ... a live mule? on Robotic 'Pack Mule' with Impressive Reflexes · · Score: 1

    Civilians complain when you kick your mule.
    However, don't kick your military mule because it's even worse when your sergeant complains.

  19. Re:"nice" "summary" on Linspire CEO Considers CNR for Ubuntu · · Score: 1

    TLA OK?

  20. Re:Refilling? on Fuel Cells for Laptops Due Next Week · · Score: 1

    Obviously they mentioned their being in Taiwan so you know where to take your fuel cells for refilling.

  21. Re:Numbers And Pictures on New Asteroid Becomes Earth's Biggest Threat · · Score: 1
    Good nights to be on a telescope!

    Looking well above the horizon in case there is a sudden flare of light from the surface.

  22. Re:selling precious medals impacts their price on The Financial Future of Space Travel · · Score: 1
    Millions of people would lose their jobs.

    In what way would the opening of a new mine cause the loss of millions of jobs?

  23. Why go to space on The Financial Future of Space Travel · · Score: 1
    There's a simpler reason to go to space.

    Get our eggs out of this nest at the bottom of a gravity well.

  24. Re:And it better not hit the earth on The Financial Future of Space Travel · · Score: 1

    So aim for the Moon and mine it there.

  25. Re:eek on The Financial Future of Space Travel · · Score: 1

    ... and since you know about this new source of gold, make sure you sell before the price drops. Finding the right time is left as an exercise for the reader.