Slashdot Mirror


Playing the World From a Basement

Albanach writes "Singer songwriter Sandi Thom is one of a growing band of new musicians using the internet to circumvent the traditional and traditionally expensive tour circuit. Thom described her free online concerts as a Web Tour, saying 'A web tour is basically what you do when you have a lack of money and no car.' Services such as The Streaming Tank have grown to satisfy the need for broadcast services and the figures are impressive. Just 74 people watched Thom's first concert on February 24th. The concert on March 2nd drew 62,138 viewers."

145 comments

  1. concert feeling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Will there be some drunkard in front of me spilling beer on my shoes? Or better yet, one on stage spilling beer on the computer so that the feed fizzles out in the middle of the show? If so, then they're certainly a good ways to capturing that live concert feeling...

    1. Re:concert feeling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Posting as AC since I modded you +1 I did include her site in the original submission, but it was editied out - presumably because the front page includes music. Thanks for posting the URL. Alb.

    2. Re:concert feeling by Popcorn+Dave · · Score: 1

      You forgot all the chicks trying to flash the band. Oh wait, that's PalTalk.

  2. Who? by NitsujTPU · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just 74 people watched Thom's first concert on February 24th. The concert on March 2nd drew 62,138 viewers.

    I guess that, at that rate, I won't be saying "who?" in a week or 2.

    1. Re:Who? by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1, Insightful

      That kid of viewership numbers could be easily explained if she performs in the nude.

      But I expect there was some marketing of some sort for the 3/2 show, and not the 2/24 show. Even so, I think you're right.

      My question is, will she sign with a major label and perpetuate the crap we deal with from the RIAA?

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    2. Re:Who? by smooth+wombat · · Score: 3, Funny
      I guess that, at that rate, I won't be saying "who?" in a week or 2.

      Just be careful you don't ask who's the band online when your nephew is nearby.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    3. Re:Who? by PFI_Optix · · Score: 1

      I've been looking for this. Best "Who's on first" since the original. Thanks.

      --
      120 characters for a sig? That's bloody useless.
    4. Re:Who? by Jason+Earl · · Score: 4, Insightful

      My question is, will she sign with a major label and perpetuate the crap we deal with from the RIAA?

      She probably will, but that's just because the RIAA still has more marketing muscle than anyone else. However, there is no question that the balance of power is shifting in favor of the artists. The primary reason that the RIAA is so powerful is that historically the RIAA controlled the primary means of marketing music. Unless you signed a deal with a major record label you couldn't get your song played on the radio, you couldn't get yourself professionally recorded, your CDs didn't end up in record stores, and you couldn't play the larger venues.

      These days creating, publishing, and distributing your own CDs is ridiculously simple, and it is possible to play in front of thousands of fans over the Internet. If the record labels continue to pretend that they have all of the leverage then we will undoubtedly see a shift towards more popular bands that choose to remain self-produced.

    5. Re:Who? by Red+Flayer · · Score: 2, Informative

      Hopefully, absolutely right.

      I checked, she's signed with Legacy, an indie in the UK. I don't know what her contract terms are, but she's been getting airplay there...

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  3. how by dotpavan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    .. different is it (live webcast) from a recorded viewing? Live concerts have the euphoria that is multiplied by the crowd unlike in thsi case (making no difference). But yes, it does give them some publicity and help them test waters before actually launching a tour.

    1. Re:how by kebes · · Score: 3, Informative

      How different is it (live webcast) from a recorded viewing?

      Actually apparently these are not even live. They are recorded daily and rebroadcast. From TFA:
      Thom uses a webcam to record a nightly performance before broadcasting it on the net later in the evening. (Emphasis added.)

      So actually this is just drumming up support by webcasting performances you do in your basement. Still a good idea, but as you say this is no substitute for going to a live show. Sure you save the costs of going on tour, but real music lovers will be much more willing to spend money on a live show, as compared to a low-resolution webcast.

      A more interesting concept would be an actual live webcast with some measure of user-feedback. Maybe pre or post online chats/interviews with the band members? Maybe the band could take live requests? Maybe the band could adjust their performance based on the number of viewers and the demographics? ("I see alot of people logging in from London... welcome! This one is for you...").

    2. Re:how by Reapy · · Score: 3, Informative

      There actually are some things like this in Second Life. A few musicians play weekly concerts in the game. They set up a streaming server, get a location in world, and people show up with the avatars and listen to person playing, who is also present in world. Often on the stream they will comment on the chat between songs and take requests.

      Granted the quality and flavor is that of a local bar rather then a "profesional" concert, but I found the experience to be quite unique.

    3. Re:how by bobbyshade · · Score: 1

      A great excample of live webcasting is Levon Helm's "Midnight Ramble Sessions". For a resonable fee you get to watch Levon's band and guests live from his studio in Woodstock, NY. http://www.levonhelm.com/midnight_ramble.htm I pay my $ and my friends and I watch on the big screen from the computer projector. My Band www.deepwoodsband.com

    4. Re:how by BlueStrat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually apparently these are not even live. They are recorded daily and rebroadcast. From TFA:
      Thom uses a webcam to record a nightly performance before broadcasting it on the net later in the evening. (Emphasis added.)

      So actually this is just drumming up support by webcasting performances you do in your basement. Still a good idea, but as you say this is no substitute for going to a live show. Sure you save the costs of going on tour, but real music lovers will be much more willing to spend money on a live show, as compared to a low-resolution webcast.

      A more interesting concept would be an actual live webcast with some measure of user-feedback. Maybe pre or post online chats/interviews with the band members? Maybe the band could take live requests? Maybe the band could adjust their performance based on the number of viewers and the demographics? ("I see alot of people logging in from London... welcome! This one is for you...").


      I'm looking at doing something like that right now for the band I'm in. I'm the "computer guy" in the band (run linux, a couple *BSDs, OpenSolaris, etc) so, I'm the one they ask about things like this.

      The biggest obstacle I've encountered so far to doing a "live" webconcert from a venue like a club, festival, and even many larger theatres and auditoriums is lack of high speed connectivity.

      I'm currently talking with the local blues association and one of the local clubs that is a heavy blues/live music supporter and advocate about getting something like this to happen.

      The only option for anything other than dialup is cable broadband (too far from a CO for DSL/ADSL).

      One of the concerns the club owner has is if this will make him liable for anything related to playing of cover tunes of copyrighted material, or possibly legal concerns if, for instance, a female patron has a "wardrobe malfunction" after imbibing a little too much.

      Having the connection in someone other than the properties' leasees' or owners' name is also verboten by the local cable monopoly, so having it in the blues associations' name is out.

      Also, because it's a commercial-zoned property and a buisiness, a commercial connection must be purchased.

      Municipal/community wifi/wimax would sure help, but no chance of that here anytime soon. They're more worried at the moment with trying to raise enough money to keep a functioning fire and police dept.

      So, for now, it looks like the most practical way is to broadcast/upload a show recorded earlier live. Too bad, as I'd love to play live to such a diverse audience, especially if there were an interactive component.

      What a thrill as a musician to get "applause" from across the globe, while playing your favorite local venue!

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    5. Re:how by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      It would have been nice if they had had something like this when the who did tommy way back when. the live show was the best, but would be great to re live over and over again. posted this from cell phone, but i could not log on as my user cayenne8 :(

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    6. Re:how by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is fucking cool

  4. I don't know... by Nosferax · · Score: 5, Funny

    I don't know... sitting alone in front of my computer with my lighter just isn't the same...

    --
    Remember... A boomerang IS NOT the best way to deliver a bomb.
    1. Re:I don't know... by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 4, Funny

      Depends on what you're doing with that lighter... ; )

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    2. Re:I don't know... by digitaldc · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't know... sitting alone in front of my computer with my lighter just isn't the same...

      I know what you mean, now everyone is just using the light from their cell phones.

      --
      He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
    3. Re:I don't know... by advocate_one · · Score: 1
      I know what you mean, now everyone is just using the light from their cell phones.

      wow, so many camera phones/recording devices...

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    4. Re:I don't know... by SEWilco · · Score: 1
      wow, so many camera phones/recording devices...

      Don't point your phone at your computer screen, nobody wants this performance to end up on the Net.

  5. Link to her website, maybe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
    1. Re:Link to her website, maybe? by 0110011001110101 · · Score: 2, Funny
      Oh nice move mr. Linkey. Now she'll get 6,123,456 viewers for her next show, which will probably get slashdotted about halfway through....

      Honestly, think things through jackass. /sarcasm

      --
      Don't anthropomorphize computers: they hate that.
    2. Re:Link to her website, maybe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, she's pretty good, certianly better than most of the garbage we get to hear today. She strikes a unique blend between country, rock and 70's pop.

  6. Oh from the basement... by GillBates0 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm kinda thankful they aren't trying out the traditional bathroom-singing business model. Granted, the acoustics are nice, but the visuals suck...except for female musicians, ofcourse.

    --
    An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
    1. Re:Oh from the basement... by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1

      Wait till I launch my World From a Bathtub tour in a few weeks. That's sure to garner me some international attention!

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    2. Re:Oh from the basement... by gstoddart · · Score: 1
      I'm kinda thankful they aren't trying out the traditional bathroom-singing business model. Granted, the acoustics are nice, but the visuals suck...except for female musicians, ofcourse.

      Oh, I dunno.

      Women singing while peeing wouldn't be that far from some videos I've seen. You could probably market that. ;-P
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    3. Re:Oh from the basement... by why-is-it · · Score: 1
      Women singing while peeing wouldn't be that far from some videos I've seen. You could probably market that. ;-P

      Given the overly-specific nature of some Japanese pr0n, I suspect that someone has done that already!

      --
      *** Where are we going? And what's with this handbasket?
  7. buffering......buffering... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    scratchy vocals and music. ... too many people logged on....&$@*(*$#^^^[NO CARRIER]

    Sounds like fun.

  8. Internet concert maths... by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just 74 people watched Thom's first concert on February 24th. The concert on March 2nd drew 62,138 viewers.So, are there 62,064 people now sifting through the piracy sites for a torrent of an Xvid rip of the first one?

  9. Ok see if this works by od05 · · Score: 1
    Go to licktheblade.com and let's see how many people show up at the next show...

    http://www.licktheblade.com/

    1. Re:Ok see if this works by advocate_one · · Score: 1

      cheers... free music folks... "Iron Maiden" stylee... if you want to know who they sound like...

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
  10. Ironically enough... by kotj.mf · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Touring is about the only way an indie artist can make any money these days, at least in the US.

    Your margins on the merch are way better, and the beer is free.

    --
    hang brain.
    1. Re:Ironically enough... by Shadarr · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I was thinking the same thing. The new business model should be to give away the recordings because they were always a loss leader anyway, and make your money on live shows and merch. I would guess that she's generating a lot more buzz than she really should, just because she's doing something "new." Once this becomes the norm, it won't be viable.

    2. Re:Ironically enough... by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1

      These days? That's the only way indie bands have ever been able to make any money...

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    3. Re:Ironically enough... by soupdevil · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The assumption is that every artist is a live performer. While live performance is one talent, recording, remixing, songwriting, arranging, and many other musical skills don't lend themselves well to the stage. But music would be much poorer without them.

      There will always be a place for live bands. But I hope we as a society don't lose the ability to reward those who create music in other ways.
    4. Re:Ironically enough... by hackstraw · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The new business model should be to give away the recordings because they were always a loss leader anyway, and make your money on live shows and merch.

      That is not the new business model, its the only one.

      It kills me that someone actually thinks that one can be a millionaire for life because they spend a couple of weeks in a recording studio. Granted, some people do. Sting reportedly makes $2,000 a day off of "Every breath you take". Who pays this is beyond me. But still, that is "only" 0.75 mil a year for one of the most popular songs ever recorded. The lottery is a much better investment for those that don't want to work and have cash.

    5. Re:Ironically enough... by rob_squared · · Score: 1

      "...and the beer is free."
      Unless you're the Blues Brothers.

      RAWHIDE!

      --
      I don't get it.
    6. Re:Ironically enough... by symbolic · · Score: 1

      Nice thought there. I decided a long time ago that it was rather presumptuous of the "concertly-inclined" to decide that an artist had to tour in order to make any money. It's their music, let them choose their venue.

    7. Re:Ironically enough... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about athletes? They "contribute" nothing to society and the big ones make shitloads of money. While musicians spend time and money on making music that will survive for a long time, athletes produce nothing.

    8. Re:Ironically enough... by somersault · · Score: 1

      I was told that most big artists dont actually turn a profit from touring (only artist guaranteed to profit is U2, though that was 5 years ago now I heard it) - rather that the tours are just for publicity to sell new albums.

      And since everyone is whoring bandlinks, here's my band :D Kordoba .

      While playing live is fun, I much prefer to have a recorded song to listen to, and would rather buy an album which I can enjoy for the rest of my life, than spend twice as much (or more) on a concert that I'm going to forget about anyway (only 'big' bands I've seen live are Radiohead and Franz Ferdinand, it's fun jumping around but meh..)

      --
      which is totally what she said
    9. Re:Ironically enough... by serutan · · Score: 1

      Ironic indeed... almost NO musicians make money from sales of recordings, because in a standard recording contract all the expenses of producing, manufacturing, packaging and marketing are deducted from the musician's supposed royalties before any payout. So the payout is usually zero, even years and years after a record is made. The exceptions are the very few artists like Madonna who not only sell a ton of records but negotiate smarter deals as they go along.

      In almost all cases the only way recording benefits musicians is that it gives them exposure, which generates bigger and better live gigs, which is how they actually make a living. The vast majority of musicians do not have recording contracts and never will. It's ironic that most of the public has enjoyed the benefits of recording technology but almost no musicians have.

    10. Re:Ironically enough... by soupdevil · · Score: 1

      Songwriters automatically make concrete royalties off of record sales. But songwriters are not guaranteed payment on public performances, because no one tracks individual performances. Songwriter royalties on public performances are based on sampling data, which ignores the long tail, and overpays the top 100. Same as it ever was...

    11. Re:Ironically enough... by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      The new business model should be to give away the recordings because they were always a loss leader anyway, and make your money on live shows and merch.

      The assumption is that every artist is a live performer. While live performance is one talent, recording, remixing, songwriting, arranging, and many other musical skills don't lend themselves well to the stage. But music would be much poorer without them.

      Indeed. It also makes the assumption that most of the money comes from merchandising and live performance and that recordings generate very little - which is only true of the small band. (Who sell damm few albums.) When you get big, the numbers reverse - the live performances are little more than commercials for the album/cd/what have you. Better yet, a recording can generate income for decades rather than just one night. (Johnny Cash, or more accurately his estate, has something on the order of fifty albums in print. That tells me more than anything else the power of the recording to generate cash flow.)

      Assuming that the economics of $GARAGE_BAND is the same as those of $MEGA_BAND is a dangerous path. They aren't.

  11. As a musician . . . by galonso · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As a musician, I think this is very exciting. The 'alternative' conventional wisdom of late has been that marketing your band/music online is the wave of the future, but I'm not aware of a concerted (heh) streaming approach that includes performances. Most articles I've read push distribution and marketing in the traditional mp3 sort of sense.

    This reminds me of the time when bands were experimenting with slide shows (pre-automation) run by a 'stealth' band member alla early Human League to give a multimedia edge to their presentation. With current technology, why not have a web presence with streaming concert video 'events' as the center piece to the normal mp3 / wallpaper / avant design elements.

    Heck, why not have interative art featuring music and graphics based on the old quaint notion of a 'concept album' . . .

    --
    -[joke removed for your safety]-
  12. Other Advantages by Flwyd · · Score: 4, Funny

    Concert attendees didn't have to pay $5 to get a beer from the fridge.

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une signature.
    1. Re:Other Advantages by jellings · · Score: 0

      you also need not suffer the consequences of second hand smoke . . . the number one reason to NOT see a live band these days, IMO.

    2. Re:Other Advantages by dr_dank · · Score: 1

      But stagediving off the living room couch is kinda lame though.

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    3. Re:Other Advantages by this1kid · · Score: 1

      Not if you're five years old.

    4. Re:Other Advantages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      No convenience fees paid to TicketBastard (TicketMaster) either!

    5. Re:Other Advantages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OH GOD GET THE STUPID OFF OF ME! WHY DO I SUBJECT MYSELF TO THIS SITE?

      (No, it wasn't all your fault)
      lameness filter lameness filter lameness filter lameness filter sucks

    6. Re:Other Advantages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They also enjoyed smoking out of their 5 foot bongs, instead of having to pass a roach between 50 people.

    7. Re:Other Advantages by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

      you also need not suffer the consequences of second hand smoke . . . the number one reason to NOT see a live band these days, IMO.

      You're much more at risk of dying in a traffic accident on the way there and back or getting mugged in the parking lot.

      Other than that, the major reason most people don't go to live shows much anymore is the fact there are fewer and fewer venues for bands to play in, for one.

      Most small to medium sized clubs these days are going to karaoke and DJs due to the vanishingly-small-and-shrinking profits clubs these days can generate due to increasing costs of insurance, licenses, and taxes.

      I have no evidence other than my own and friends' anecdotal evidence as gigging musicians, but where smoking has been banned in bars and clubs, the venues for blues and jazz have taken a huge hit in attendance.

      Many are either reducing their live music schedule, or eliminating live music altogether due to the drop in attendance at these smaller local venues after smoking bans were implemented.

      Seems like the "working Joes" going out on the weekend to drink some pitchers and listen to music are now either finding other things to do, or traveling out of town to venues that are friendlier to patrons.

      Not voicing an opinion here on my views on smoking, just noting what I've experienced as someone whose livelyhood is somewhat dependent on there being venues to play at, and noticing the list getting shorter when certain things happen.

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    8. Re:Other Advantages by SEWilco · · Score: 1
      Concert attendees didn't have to pay $5 to get a beer from the fridge.

      Depends on the contract for the concert.

    9. Re:Other Advantages by jonwil · · Score: 1

      The other problem with live music venues is that (at least here in Perth, Australia), more and more live venues (pubs etc) are either going away (because the land is more valuable with a nice new apartment block on it) or being hobbled because a nice new apartment block goes up next door and even though the pub has been there (and been playing live music) a lot longer than the apartment block has been there, the people who move into the new apartment block have been able to convince councils, government departments etc to force the pub next door to stop making so much noise.

    10. Re:Other Advantages by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

      The other problem with live music venues is that (at least here in Perth, Australia), more and more live venues (pubs etc) are either going away (because the land is more valuable with a nice new apartment block on it) or being hobbled because a nice new apartment block goes up next door and even though the pub has been there (and been playing live music) a lot longer than the apartment block has been there, the people who move into the new apartment block have been able to convince councils, government departments etc to force the pub next door to stop making so much noise.

      Yes, that's another problem we here in the States share, especially near prime areas like beaches and coastlines in the south with condos springing up side-by-side in many areas.

      The problem is nearly as bad up here between Detroit and Chicago, the difference being all the "downtown renovation", etc type projects all these once-strong industrial-powered and financed towns are coming up with in an attempt to recover from the huge industrial exodus in these parts.

      It's very sad, as the area from Chicago to Detroit has a huge amount of blues and other talent, but there's hardly anyplace for a band or artist starting out to hone their skills, or "pay their dues", so to speak.

      I'm hoping this might help bands/artists have a better chance at getting heard, so at least there is *some* route left to making it to where at least an owner/manager of one of the few, highly sought-after venues that are left might have heard of them, and consider them seriously for a spot on the calendar.

      At the local blues venue here, they're booked ahead for ages, and name, national acts are appearing..and this place only holds about 100-120 people! The competition between all the local bands has driven the pay to nothing...literally. You get either $5 or $10 cover from the door and 1 well drink/beer per set.

      Where we make money is playing all the festivals, etc during the spring/summer/fall seasons. If we had to start out again playing small clubs, we'd probably end up going broke.

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
  13. Free live karaoke concert 9pm-2am pst tue-sat by t0qer · · Score: 1

    I run toqerTV, the only live streaming broadcast of karaoke in the world. You may not like karaoke and terrible singing, but if you like seeing drunk girls jump up and down then we're for you.

    I did try to do real musicians one sunday. For about 5 hours we broadcasted various local rap artists. Ratings online sucked, and everyone that came to the show just ordered water.

    1. Re:Free live karaoke concert 9pm-2am pst tue-sat by drooling-dog · · Score: 1

      Interesting. That might explain why American Idol does so well. The media surrounds us with people who are much more talented than we are, but where do we go to see/hear people who suck as badly as we do? It's very reassuring.

    2. Re:Free live karaoke concert 9pm-2am pst tue-sat by goarilla · · Score: 1

      i hear no sound neither with mplayer nor (g)xine which audio codec do you use?

    3. Re:Free live karaoke concert 9pm-2am pst tue-sat by t0qer · · Score: 1

      AACP or sometimes known as ACC+

      Thread on configuration Here

    4. Re:Free live karaoke concert 9pm-2am pst tue-sat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't you read the parent???
      He even admitted you're much better off without the sound codec installed!

    5. Re:Free live karaoke concert 9pm-2am pst tue-sat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it's seeing the people who SUCK SO BAD and Don't Realize it that is sobering. I mean, people tell you stuff you've done is good all the time even though most people inside know that it wasn't done that great, and there on TV are people who are completely oblivious to their own inability to sing. so we learn that if you felt you could have done better, the people who said 'you did fine' are Just Lying/trying to make you feel better about how awful you were.

      the rule is if you thought you could have done better, you COULD have done better, so next time do your BEST, and if that isn't good enough (odds are it isn't) then consider what else you could be doing.

    6. Re:Free live karaoke concert 9pm-2am pst tue-sat by TaoJones · · Score: 1
      Oh joy - I can now listen to a bunch of incoherent drunks royally fucking up songs in the privacy of my own home. Good job, I think the internet is done now. Let's not innovate anymore, please. Go home now, for the sake of the children.

      After listening for 10 minutes or so I'm feeling a strange urge to buy a shotgun. It's that bad...

      --
      "Fear is the rootkit of democracy.." Blarkon
    7. Re:Free live karaoke concert 9pm-2am pst tue-sat by edmicman · · Score: 1

      Nobody's singing! Someone - get up there! What time EST is usually good to watch?

    8. Re:Free live karaoke concert 9pm-2am pst tue-sat by edmicman · · Score: 1

      Of course as soon as I write that I see the comment subject - please disregard my stupidity :-P

  14. Playing the world? by fak3r · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I thought this article was going to be a slam at the standard /. meme; a loaner living in his parents basement playing World of Warcraft all hours of the night!

    As it stands, it's a nice idea to try and spread music/art this way, but it will *never* come close to providing the atomosphere/feeling that one gets at a concert or art gallery.

    1. Re:Playing the world? by KarateExplosions · · Score: 2, Funny

      I was going to say the exact same thing, except I was probably going to be a total sarcastic asshole about it.

  15. Great chance for new musicians by coffeechica · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think this is an excellent opportunity for an upcoming musician/band. It gets you some publicity, people can check you out, and maybe they'll remember your name once you actually play in a club somewhere. Perhaps you could even sell your music this way - and you'd cut out the middle man and actually get more than the measly 16cents or so. It's going to be word-of-mouth, but that works often enough.

  16. Can't beat it by edmicman · · Score: 4, Funny

    Nothing like being in the mosh pit by yourself in front of the computer. And my mom wonders why I keep breaking all my stuff!

    1. Re:Can't beat it by Night+Goat · · Score: 1

      That comment reminded me of a scene in the movie "S.F.W." where Spab and his friend mosh around and wreck Spab's room. Funny stuff.

  17. Goofè by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Best "Who's on first" since the original.

    What? I Don't Know...

    1. Re:Goofè by As_I_Please · · Score: 1

      Third Base!

    2. Re: Goofè by gidds · · Score: 1
      ...but only one of them's playing bass!

      --

      Ceterum censeo subscriptionem esse delendam.

  18. This isn't "touring" by LazyPhoenix · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Sure, the intarwebs have been great for bands -- including mine! -- but, for me, the joy, the passion, the reason for doing it is the live shows. I love touring to new towns and clubs and making new fans. People dancing, drinking, having a great time. Playing music FOR people.

    I think the advent of easier video will continue to bring great opportunities to indie musicians, but it ain't touring.

  19. Distribution without the cartels by dada21 · · Score: 0

    The push for hardware based DRM is being financed by the distribution cartels -- the same people who use the force of copyright to earn a buck.

    The push for better independent entertainment online may not be strong enough to topple the future DRM schemes, leading to an Internet where these broadcasts may not happen.

    I'm anti-copyright in every situation. I strongly believe that artists can now find new ways to earn a living without the need to use government force to protect fictional property. I'm financing a studio in Chicago called No Copyright Studios ( soon to be at http://www.nocopyrightstudios.com/ ) later this year to try out new ways for musicians, podcasters, and artists in general to make money without copyright.

    Playing live online is one of our ideas. We figure you can give away the mastered songs to get people to want to come to live shows. We also figure that bands can do fairly well with live acoustic performances online, or maybe even offering people who buy the band's official album a password to see the band practice in the studio, or record.

    Artists like the one mentioned are finding new ways to make a living without forcing people to follow ancient laws. In your job, do you get residual payments for past work? Generally not. Neither should artists. Income to me means work -- repeated work over time. If you're lucky enough to produce something that millions want, you should have the drive to go and perform live for them to make your living. Making a 20 cent CD and thinking that the law protects your right to charge $15 per piece for it is ridiculous -- find new ways to sell that CD for $15 by offering value added services and products with every purchase.

    My big fear, though, is that we'll see the Internet become cartel-controlled, making it hard or impossible for indy media to break into the system. Right now we have torrents and various new media websites, but how long will that last if Internet 3.0 is back in the hands of those who have abused the power of copyright for decades and decades?

    1. Re:Distribution without the cartels by LordSnooty · · Score: 1

      offering people who buy the band's official album a password to see the band practice

      Huh, but you just said you would give the songs away? Still, good luck with the venture, though you face an Everest-sized barrier. Someone has to start, I guess. I'd back the residual rights point you make, too... if I get a plumber to fix my leaky tap, do I pay him every time I fill the bowl?

  20. To: U.S. Patriots +1, Idiotic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Playing the world is too complicated.

    It's easier to just sell it short and buy on the low side.
    That's the plan for the ownership society promoted by George W. Bush.

    BushCo owns. You rent.

    Feloniously yours,
    President-VICE Richard B. Cheney

    P.S. Defend America: Buy More

  21. Success? by XMilkProject · · Score: 3, Funny

    1st Show: Unheard of band attracts 74 brave souls. 2nd Show: Word of mouth brings 62,138 happy listeners. 3rd Show: Slashdot effects takes down your server before the show starts. 4th Show: Your still trying to pay all the extra bandwidth charges from Show #3.

    --
    Big ones, small ones, some as big as yer 'ead!
    Give 'em a twist, a flick o' the wrist...
  22. Limitations by jd · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Bandwidth on the Internet is a major problem. Well, unless it's sent out over multicast with reflectors serving those still using unicast-only ISPs. Good compression helps, of course, but good compression reduces quality and is expensive on CPUs.


    The problems are all solvable - don't get me wrong - but it takes either a lot of money or someone with a lot of skill to get something like that set up, and the skill option is the only scalable one.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:Limitations by jrockway · · Score: 1

      Two words: Google Video. Google has PLENTY of bandwidth.

      --
      My other car is first.
    2. Re:Limitations by jonwil · · Score: 1

      Multicast probobly wont happen in any meaningfull way because providers cant figure out how to charge for it.

      For example, if netconcert.com sends out a concert to 20 people via unicast, thats 20 connections going out and its easy to follow those 20 packets and find out who has to pay who.
      But, if that goes out over multicast, one packet leaves the server and is split into multiple packets. How do you charge for that?

  23. 5 dollars? by danpsmith · · Score: 1

    Beers must be cheap at your shows...

    --
    Judges and senates have been bought for gold; Esteem and love were never to be sold.
  24. DVD Live Performance by Leviathant · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Whenever I go to see a band play, it usually smells kinda funny at the venue. Sometimes the singer gets the words wrong, or the drummer messes up on my favorite fill. I usually have to drive an hour to the nearest decent venue, spend money on parking, and all that. The songs don't sound the same as they do on the CD, and the musicians aren't nearly as attractive as they looked on the album artwork.

    That's why I like to buy DVDs of my favorite bands performing "live" in my living room. It's all the excitement of seeing my favorite band, without having to worry about the microphones not working, and especially without the bother of other people. I can pause the performance and go pee without anyone offering me illicit drugs. If you time it right, you might even get a package deal at the FYE, where you can get a discount on a concert tshirt if you buy the DVD at the same time. AND! And the concert's in 5.1! I don't think most venues are set up to play in 5.1 surround sound yet, they're still only outputting stereo.


    No one ever says, Dude, you remember watching that concert at Matt's place in 2002? That was amazing!

    --
    I am Leviathant and I approve this message.
  25. Re:The real question is? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if you would RT(F)A, you would have seen that Yes, she is hot. Quite a tasy treat..... might have to tune in one evening.

  26. As a musician . . .A GPU is worth a thousand words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Heck, why not have interative art featuring music and graphics based on the old quaint notion of a 'concept album' . . ."

    Yay! Something to give my consoles GPU something to do.

  27. Live Music already quite popular in Second Life by johnthorensen · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm a resident of Second Life, an online virtual world. Very different than a MMORPG, it's basically an open-ended place for people to socialize, build, et cetera. Second Life is also unique in that you own the copyright of any content you create in-world. This has lead to some really creative and clever objects.

    More to the point though, the phenomenon of live music has really taken hold within Second Life. There are several artist residents (Astrin Few and Flaming Moe are two I can think of) who hold regular concerts, play in virtual taverns, and overall take advantage of the relatively cultured community that exists within the world (the client supports streaming audio via ShoutCast servers). I also know of a Live Music Festival (organized by a resident named Nethermind Bliss) that will be happening this year, with both a true live venue on the east cost and a virtual venue in-world. This hybrid event will be a great opportunity to expose residents to some talented artists.

    -JT

    1. Re:Live Music already quite popular in Second Life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Instead of spending so much time in a fantasy world why not use it to help improve the lives of real people by volunteering at a soup kitchen or becoming a Big Brother? I can guarantee that it will be more rewarding and as a bonus you will be helping make your real community a better place to live.

    2. Re:Live Music already quite popular in Second Life by ka-klick · · Score: 1

      The music scene in SL is really exploding. Another of the "old guard" of pioneering performers in SL is Frogg Marlowe and he often (usually) plays with (at the same time) Jaycatt Nico. Recently a pretty good number of us have started making our way onto the virtual stages around SL. I go by Kaklick Martin and perform at least a few times a month, Melvin Took, Slim Warrior, Cylindrian Ruttabega, Mel Cheeky, DimiVan Ludwig... all artists worth going and checking out. I know there are many I'm missing here, these are one's I've heard and know, but there are many excellent musicians playing SL stages these days.

      For those here in /. it's an excellent opportunity to find some great (NON-RIAA infected) music. If every anonymous coward that bellyaches about how all music sucks these days would just check out and invest in some of the great truly independent artists out there...

      If you're curious about this, but don't want to dive into SL, my homepage is my Live365 station, that plays self-produced music (from me and a few of the above mentioned acts, and several others who aren't yet on SL).

      --

      MSRP - Tax, Title & Licence Extra Your Milage May Vary

    3. Re:Live Music already quite popular in Second Life by metlin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm a resident of real life.

      Very different from a make-believe world, we meet together every weekend and play music, build things, socialize etc etc. Even in our real worlld, we own the copyrights to the things we create.

      For example, just last week, we built a bed for my apartment which I own. All of this has led to some really creative and clever objects, such as lego beer dispensers.

      Anyway, more to the point, music has really taken hold in our real lives. Me and my friends go to concerts, and we even play in a local band! There are several bars (Hofbrauhaus and Beer Sellar are two I can think of) where real musicians play in real bars with real beer and real women with real boobs. Okay, maybe not the last one. Sadly, not all of us are a cultured people, but it has however taught us such things as tolerance. For those of us do like tolerance, we go to these things called musicals, orchestras and theatre plays.

      I also know of these music festivals like the Celtic and Renaissance music festivals that have been happening for a couple of hundred years, where once again you get to meet real *shudder* people. Those that like this can actually go to the websites (virtual, virtual!) and look up cool stuff.

      More important to the point, doing this has taught me and my friends some good social skills, gotten us free beer and live music - and sex.

      But go ahead, though. I'm sure a virtual life is infinitely more enjoyable. I mean, we sure as hell can't do all that stuff in real life, right? Right?

    4. Re:Live Music already quite popular in Second Life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Instead of spending so much time being a retarded troll, why not help improve the lives of real people by volunteering to kill yourself? I can guarantee that it will be more rewarding and as a bonus you will be helping make your community a better place to live.

      Thanks.

    5. Re:Live Music already quite popular in Second Life by brunes69 · · Score: 1

      You don't understand.. he is a resident.. he lives there.

    6. Re:Live Music already quite popular in Second Life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You also seem to be a dolt, who would rather make fun of something than see its merit. Virtual worlds are at this point about where IM was 5 years ago; something that's been 'nerdy' in the past but which is becoming incredibly popular.

      So make fun if you wish; and please do enjoy wacking off to your "real-life" pictures of Nell Carter.

    7. Re:Live Music already quite popular in Second Life by klept · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ok. I live in Hawaii. How in the real world am I going to communicate and be amused with girls in Paris if I dont do it online? I know, there are plenty of beautiful and sexy girls in Hawaii. And I have beautiful, sexy times with them. But Paris girls are different. Vive la difference. They are cultured and fun in other ways, and I dont mean we spend all night talking about Sartes in French. Actually isnt a lot of social interaction really conversation and just talking? The physical stuff is not that big a deal, at least not if you are having enough of it in life. IMO the one big thing girls and guys miss is not having someone of the opposite sex to talk to. And the virtual world can fill this need very nicely. Just look at what goes on in City of Heroes. That said, I thought your comment was hilarious. Snakes on a Plane.

    8. Re:Live Music already quite popular in Second Life by RipTides9x · · Score: 1

      HA!

      You had me going there.
      All the way until the - and sex part.
      But I will give you an A for effort.

  28. After checking out her site... by teamhasnoi · · Score: 1
    It seems that she is really selling exclusitivity (is that a word?) in the sense that her @home shows are all sold out. Obviously, you can't sell out a stream (within hardware limitations), but she is also peddling 10 seats at the physical location.

    This twist is new enough that it's going to get her some eyeballs, and some fans - who will hopefully go on to buy the physical merch, such as CDs, tshirts and the like...or better yet, tell their pals.

    I can't see this working for everyone - she's really going at it with a show every day. She also is good, which (depending on your tastes, and where you look) is hard to find. I found her to be like something I'd hear on American Idol, but YMMV.

    The genius of this is that the whole thing is on her terms, which for a musician/band playing out is rare. Start times are set by the venue, pay is still what it was in the mid-70's (thanks in large part to crappy bands that will play for free, and easily-awed patrons, "Ohhh! It's Brown-Eye Girl!"), and travel, especially in Minnesota, is often a bitch.

    I've thought of doing a live stream, but there's only so many hours in a day - I've got enough to do right now with recording, pre-production, and writing. Hell, it's a wonder I can manage to get any show in. Perhaps I'll stop posting to /. for a week, and really get some stuff done...

  29. Re:The real question is? by advocate_one · · Score: 2, Informative
    --
    Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
  30. Not exactly a new idea... by TheLongshot · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Ozric Tentacles did a live broadcast over the internet back in 98. It was later released on CD as "Spice Doubt". Course, it was audio only back in those days.

    I'm sure others have done it as well.

  31. Plain and Simple by frenchs · · Score: 1

    Freebird!

    -s

    1. Re:Plain and Simple by ka-klick · · Score: 1

      Come to one of my shows in SecondLife and I'll play it for ya :-)

      --

      MSRP - Tax, Title & Licence Extra Your Milage May Vary

  32. Re:DVD Live Performance by Reducer2001 · · Score: 2, Funny
    go pee without anyone offering me illicit drugs

    Dude, that's the best part!

    --
    When you get to hell -- tell 'em Itchy sent ya!
  33. Re:The real question is? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    62,138 came for the concert huh... yeah right, I've seen her pictures.
     
      Wait you mean she was singing too?

  34. what software? by krock_of_PB-HF · · Score: 1

    I've been looking at a Carnegie Mellon peer-2-peer software to do just this. Check it out at http://esm.cs.cmu.edu./ I like it because it uses peer-2-peer to keep things FREE. Has anyone used anything similar to do free broadcasts?
    Paul

  35. Re:DVD Live Performance by teamhasnoi · · Score: 3, Funny
    That's why I like to buy DVDs of my favorite bands performing "live" in my living room.

    I am interested in playing your 'living room' venue, but I have a few questions. What capacity is it? Does the band provide the DVD, or is the recording done 'in house'?

    Are food and drink provided in the dressing room, or trailer?

    What are your preferred set times, and who do I need to send the stage plot to?

    Thanks for your attention,
    teamhasnoi - The Schmoejoes

  36. Oh yeah.... by shoma-san · · Score: 1

    FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP http://www.sandithom.com/ much better...

  37. Distribution without the Reality. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The push for hardware based DRM is being financed by the distribution cartels -- the same people who use the force of copyright to earn a buck."

    That's OK. I use the force of contract law to earn a living.

    "I'm anti-copyright in every situation. I strongly believe that artists can now find new ways to earn a living without the need to use government force to protect fictional property."

    And I'm anti-contract law. I too strongly believe that everyone (inncluding you) can earn a living without using government force to protect the fictional results we create.

    "My big fear, though, is that we'll see the Internet become cartel-controlled, making it hard or impossible for indy media to break into the system. Right now we have torrents and various new media websites, but how long will that last if Internet 3.0 is back in the hands of those who have abused the power of copyright for decades and decades?"

    *rolls eyes*

    Give the man a sandwich board and a bell, and let him walk the streets "The world ends tomorrow". Never mind that no one has the courage (let alone remember) to call out the prophets when their gloom and doom doesn't come true.

  38. So You Mean... by eno2001 · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...one COULD become a rockstar in one's own parent's basement after all!!! Will the technology wonders never cease?! ;P

    --
    -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
  39. Low-resolution webcast? by b00m3rang · · Score: 1

    As opposed to the 30 year old blown speakers in some shitty club, cranked up way past the limits of the system, pumping out more distortion than music? Not that there aren't good sounding systems out there, but it's not likely this band is going to be playing on one, in your area, anytime soon.

  40. singing AND the bathroom by Savatte · · Score: 1

    I think Chuck Berry's eyes just opened a wide as they can.

  41. can't come to dinner mom.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    ..I'm giving a CONCERT!

    Heh.. I'll have to remember that one.

    I mean, I would have to remember it if I actually lived in my parent's basement, which I don't. I mean, if they had a basement. Uhh.

  42. The mouse that roared by Bucc5062 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    From tfa..."In the past eight days she has entertained more than 250,000 fans worldwide"

    From 70, to 62000, to 250,000 listeners. What an incredible way to build a base before she (and the band) go out and do tours. This is also just what RIAA *does not want to happen*. Young unkown band gets found not by some way over paid agent of musical darkness, but by the people themselves. A great example of what the interent *can* do for the masses and the individual.

    Next step for this band and others to follow; produce and deliver an Album (as in collection of songs, not vinyl) that can be offered to those 250,000+ fans and growing without ever burning one CD. TCO to the band, nada for RIAA. The biggest obstacle I would see is they (and any band) would have problems booking gigs in larger venues without greasing the wheels of the venue promoters who are most likely in the pockets of the music industry.

    IAOASD (I am only a software developer) so I may only see the rose through my glasses, but this could be the mouse that roared.

    Music is not bad either.

    --
    Life is a great ride, the vehicle doesn't matter
    1. Re:The mouse that roared by zotz · · Score: 1

      [The biggest obstacle I would see is they (and any band) would have problems booking gigs in larger venues without greasing the wheels of the venue promoters who are most likely in the pockets of the music industry.]

      One immediate thought would be to find some way to pre sell tickets with money back if no show. Go to the venue with a sold out concert and see if they change their tune.

      At least you might make the news when the venue refuses to play a pre sold out concert.

      all the best,

      drew

      --
      FreeMusicPush If you want to see more Free Music made, listen to Free
    2. Re:The mouse that roared by Photon+Ghoul · · Score: 1

      Next step for this band and others to follow; produce and deliver an Album (as in collection of songs, not vinyl) that can be offered to those 250,000+ fans and growing without ever burning one CD.

      There are many netlabels already doing this. Is that what you mean?

    3. Re:The mouse that roared by Bucc5062 · · Score: 1

      kinda, the thing is to start to structure the music by genre, style so people can better locate the style/sound they like and or go to a specific artist. If itunes costs me .99c for regular pop tune, then perhaps an indie can cost less if they are recording and producing without the overhead of the RIAA machine. Again, this is the beauty of the internet. Create it, record it, deliver it wihtout the "machine" pimping it. Instead it is the talent, and word of mouth (like /.) that makes it happen.

      --
      Life is a great ride, the vehicle doesn't matter
    4. Re:The mouse that roared by patio11 · · Score: 1

      IAOASD, but I think the next step for the band might be, oh, shot in the dark, transforming "fans" into "customers". And then they're going to learn the fundamental truth of the dot-com bubble -- eyeballs do not equal dollars. CD distribution contracts, on the other hand, do -- the entire "stable" model of publishing is that you get some money up front plus a (comparitively small) rake of the total in return for Team Lesser Evil subsidizing the marketing campaign that has proven success in actually convincing people to spend money (and subsidizing the artists who don't make the mega-hits). And if your CD fails you still get something to live off of. 250,000 enthusiastic fans and $3.99 will buy you a cup of coffee at Starbucks.

  43. mp3 is out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're all feeding through macromedia, so if you want to share it with your friends you have send them to the source. It sucks for me, cos you can't always preload that streaming stuff on dialup, it's all jerky and lame.

  44. Fixed that typo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thom described her free online concerts as a Web Tour, saying 'A web tour is basically what you do when you have a lack of money and no career.'

  45. I for one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    feel offended with the title.

  46. Re:DVD Live Performance by LordSnooty · · Score: 2, Funny

    And most importantly - can you fit a 60' inflatible pig in the living room?

    For that accurate home/festival experience, place your TV at the bottom of the garden, and watch through the kitchen window. If you need to pee, wait for 30 mins at the bathroom door first. Or just do it behind the sofa, everyone else does.

  47. who? by jftitan · · Score: 1

    Who?

    --
    "Don't Forget to Salt the Fries"
  48. Two more examples by metamatic · · Score: 1

    The Future Sound of London did a series of concerts via ISDN in 1994.

    Negativland did what they called "teletours" in the 1980s, using a simple circuit to improve the frequency response (much like pre-emphasis on vinyl LPs). Schematics are available.

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  49. Traditional MP3 sense? by spoco2 · · Score: 1

    Did the line "marketing in the traditional mp3 sort of sense." make anyone else feel old? That MP3s can be considered traditional makes me feel old... my first bought recording was a 12" LP for god's sake!

  50. More nails in the coffin... by TheZorch · · Score: 1

    Yet more nails have been driven into the coffin for the RIAA.

    They had planty of time to see the writing on the wall and now all we see are their desparate kicking and screaming as they slowly sink into oblivion.

    "You'll pay the price for your lack of vision" indeed. That line certain holds well for the recording industry. Technology has evolved to the point that we don't need them anymore and they are terrified that people will find that out. When they do, and its starts to explode there will be putting the genie back into the bottle. The beginning of the end has come, its Judgement Day for the RIAA.

    --
    Michael "TheZorch" Haney
    thezorch@gmail.com
    http://thezorch.googlepages.com/home
  51. take a look at peercast and freecast by zotz · · Score: 1

    Take a look at peercast as well.

    And while you are at it, you may as well check freecast.

    http://www.peercast.org/

    http://www.freecast.org/

    I have used peercast for years. I am still meaning to try freecast. One of the people involved in freecast hangs out in the #rivendell channel on freenode if you have any questions for him.

    all the best,

    drew

    http://www.ourmedia.org/node/111123
    A link to "Tings" the first draft of a novel I wrote in November 05 and put under a CC BY-SA licence. (think copyleft)

    --
    FreeMusicPush If you want to see more Free Music made, listen to Free
    1. Re:take a look at peercast and freecast by krock_of_PB-HF · · Score: 1

      I did work with peercast extensively, but could never get it to work to my satisfaction. I want to broadcast audio and video, and I don't want to use Micros$oft for any part of it.
      I just looked at it again, and the video feeds in the yellow pages mostly don't work. Looks like I'm not the only one having trouble with peercast.
      I'm telling you, my man Jibin at Carnegie Mellon is writing some top notch software. Uses videolan vlc for the encoding and capture, and you can use multiple machines to divide the tasks.

      Are you useing peercast or freecast for video broadcasts?
      Paul

    2. Re:take a look at peercast and freecast by zotz · · Score: 1

      Hey Paul,

      I am basically an audio broadcaster when it comes to peercast. All linux.

      I have experimented with streaming video both from a web cam and a video camera over firewire again all linux. (peercast again)

      If you want some notes, let me know.

      all the best,

      drew

      --
      FreeMusicPush If you want to see more Free Music made, listen to Free
  52. no risk by opencity · · Score: 1

    While I'm not sure why this is news and sort of hope she paid someone for the plug -

    In meatspace there is the element of risk. Performance comes in real time like sports. If you blow it in the first 10 minutes, you have 45 to get them back. The audience feels the risk and likes it. This is why playing to a prerecorded track inevitably is duller - I call it the hidden hand of the master. They want to see you on a limb, if they know the limb can break, even better.

    This is no different than posting to youtube and linking to your myspace page except somehow it made /.

    --
    Physics is like sex: sure, it may give some practical results, but that's not why we do it.
  53. Any technical specs on how they are doing this? by xmas2003 · · Score: 1
    The bands website is short on technical details ... but earlier today, the streaming video (and audio)seemed to be fairly snappy - anyone know how the heck they are handling the load streaming to these thousands of people at once?

    Also, the frame rate appeared to be pretty good and decent image quality - compare to watching paint dry webcam - gotta be a decent webcam - anyone know what is being used.

    --
    Hulk SMASH Celiac Disease
    1. Re:Any technical specs on how they are doing this? by cwilly · · Score: 1

      On Streaming Tank's site http://www.streamingtank.com/, they have 16,000 servers worldwide. According to them, they plan to have 64,000 by the end of 2006. I don't know what kind of servers or OS they are running, but apparently its plenty enough to a 60,000+ streams at once.

  54. So in other words by MerlinTheWizard · · Score: 1

    welcome to the wonderful world of autism? ;-)

  55. Concert in the nude by whoppers · · Score: 1

    That'd make the attendance really rise.

  56. I've Said It Before - This Is The Future by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

    of the music business.

    Now, if only John Hughes, the manager of my favorite band, The Corrs, would get over his Net phobia about downloads and get with the program.

    Their Web site is inadequate, they don't stream video, they don't record video of their concerts, they're seriously fucking up. I could probably get them another million album sales in the US if they'd get their act together vis-a-vis the Net.

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  57. Works for any kind of singer by sepse · · Score: 1

    The fact that English speaking singers based anywhere in the world can take advantage of this kind of service or publicity, makes it similarly accesible to any other language speakers. Take for example this guy http://myspace.com/antonioguzman Latin, Spanish singer, just beginning his way in the music business, will he also be able to reach as many people as Sandi Thom? Just time can tell.

  58. Powerpoint killed the radio star by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This reminds me of the time when bands were experimenting with slide shows (pre-automation) run by a 'stealth' band member alla early Human League to give a multimedia edge to their presentation.

    Hellooooo Redmond!

  59. Not interested in lazy b*stard musicians by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1
    If you're a musician or band who is not prepared to take yourself out on the road and perform in front of a live audience in a real concert venue, then I don't consider you to be passionate enough about your music in the first place which in turn means I probably won't enjoy your music anyway so I won't buy it. Quid pro quo.

    A live concert is about travelling to a venue with a few friends, having a beer or two and enjoying the music and the ambience in the concert hall. It's about believing that when you shout "More" at the end of the concert, the artiste(s) come back out for an encore or two based on how loud everyone shouts.

    So by all means go ahead and plant yourself in front of a webcam in a little sterile room somewhere that's completely isolated from the people who buy your music and pay your wages - just don' expect me to pay for it, or even to watch it...

    --
    Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
  60. given that the band is by alizard · · Score: 1

    pulling audiences of over 260K people without the help of radio airplay or any other record company promo, I doubt the band is really going to miss you.

  61. RTFA by alizard · · Score: 1
    The band is pulling an audience of over 260K people without radio airplay or record industry promo.

    That sounds like they're either economically viable or will be real soon now using an all-Internet business model... this is proof of concept. They've managed the "fastest selling debut album of all time".

    That's news.

    Most of us have been saying for years that we'd have a breakout album from an unknown without the help of an record industry label sooner or later. Well, this is now, and the beginning of the end for the record industry as we know it. Even if the band signs up with a label, the word is now out there that one can be an economically viable popular musician without the help of a record industry which is now trying to protect itself by trying to stop technology which might be used to make competing products.

    If you can't figure out why that's news... you must be new here.

  62. Other band renewing the music business model by thbb · · Score: 1

    Einstuerzende Neubauten has been using its supporters base to help them produce 2 albums already, and they are in their third round now.

    Basically, by prepaying for the album, you get access to webcasts of the band rehearsing, live chat during the rehearsals, a monthly download, an exclusive live concert and access to the band's opinion.

    The model is apparently viable with 2000 or more supporters, hence it doesn't need a big marketing hype to produce high quality music.

  63. You RTFA by opencity · · Score: 1

    >Most of us have been saying for years that we'd have a breakout album from an unknown without the help of an record industry label

    Does the phrase Dave Mathiews Band ring a bell? Old enough to remember NWA? (first record) Drunk enough to know Black 47? All bands that got deals later.

    Pulling over 260k people. To a show? No, to a webcast.

    >her live audiences usually total about 200 when she plays in clubs around Britain.

    --

    >That sounds like they're either economically viable or will be real soon now using an all-Internet business model... this is proof of concept. They've managed the "fastest selling debut album of all time".

    You RTFA - that's the Arctic Monkeys, who are from the same general part of the world and released their music off a myspace page. This article wasn't about the Arctic Monkeys. There's a band that predates the Arctic Monkeys with the successful myspace release (can't remember the story - hooked up with Fallout Boy)

    >If you can't figure out why that's news... you must be new here.

    Well I did actually read the article so I have some catching up to do.

    --
    Physics is like sex: sure, it may give some practical results, but that's not why we do it.
  64. Re:DVD Live Performance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    which thick headed, humour deprived soul modded this 'Insightful' ?!

  65. BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    62 k 'viewers'?

    That's 61 k guys searching 'girl webcam' and tuning in until they realize where it's going. And her 65 friends.

  66. Some ideas for not going hungry by west.to.east · · Score: 1

    You could always try...

    1. Giving away good bitrate copies of albums (people will just rip them anyways)

    2. Sell your music on records / LPs / vinyl. There are alot of people willing to shell out $ for some wax. The album artwork is so much better at 12"x12", too.

    3. Point out to fans on your site that this is your career, and since you're a starving artist letting your music echo through the ether, they can feel free to toss some donations into the proverbial case

  67. Maybe... by jd · · Score: 1
    It depends on the method used for handling group membership, but I -think- it is possible to query the current multicast membership list. If evil.provider.net were to provide multicast but require that session reservation be done through them, they could have a script which periodically scanned the membership list. The total number of viewers would then be the total number of unique members of the group for the duration of the session, which could be directly billed for.


    evil.provider.net could also opt to charge a flat fee on the assumption that a typical high-volume multicast might easily reach 10,000+ people.


    A third option would be to have the multicast stream start at the ISP, with the broadcaster unicasting to a multicast reflector. The stream would then be encrypted, and decryption keys would be provided on request or at a nominal charge.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)