This large scale surveillance bullshit has been so useful against terrorism that nothing happened in Boston. They've built something which is demonstrably (unable || unwilling) to do its job. Whatever they say its job is.
He's a freak, and a paranoid treacherous loony who is desperately overdue for his date with karma. Why are you giving this hand-flapping, self-aggrandizing tosser airtime?
Cheap click bait?
A very elaborate point, i see. Do they pay you to spread hate and discredit at least?
I know exactly how to preserve my privacy on the net. I know exactly what the various online services know about me. That's because I have control over my data, for a broad definition of data. The moment you take away control from me it's over. I can concede you that's already happening with smartphones: (even though i still don't have one) my friends are leaking data about me. Glass would be immensely worse.
You did not disprove my point. Also, there's a reason why they are not banned by i don't remember what treaty. IIRC the reason was exactly that they are a defensive weapons system. That's true whatever facility you're defending.
I've been successfully cultivating anti-americanism in my backyard, thanks to the constant fertilization my crops receive from news like these. Growing perfectly fine without pesticides and\or GM.
ENOUGH WITH THIS BULLSHIT! Even though *i dissent with the sentence* i must clarify that they have been charged for clearly stating that the situation was OK, that people should stay at home and that people should just ignore those pesky FORESHOCKS that lasted for MONTHS with INCREASING magnitude. I was fucking THERE at the time (well... not exactly there as i knew that we were in for quite a ride). Enough with this disinformation.
if the republic falls.
It has failed long ago my friend... time to realize this.
the implication is that if they were effective, it'd be justified.
Never wanted to imply that, thanks for disambiguating.
I wanted my comment to sound something like "to add insult to injury".
Now you know where to stage your next Oklahoma City.
This large scale surveillance bullshit has been so useful against terrorism that nothing happened in Boston.
They've built something which is demonstrably (unable || unwilling) to do its job.
Whatever they say its job is.
He's a freak, and a paranoid treacherous loony who is desperately overdue for his date with karma. Why are you giving this hand-flapping, self-aggrandizing tosser airtime?
Cheap click bait?
A very elaborate point, i see. Do they pay you to spread hate and discredit at least?
At last you yankees finally got the tale of the three little pigs right.
That's what needs to be fixed - quickly.
You mean "fixed" like the 2003 iraq "fixed"? :p
Ok enough USA bashing for today.
We need to help the Mexicans out [...]
You mean "help" like the american foreign policy of the last 60 years or so "helped" other various countries in the same continent?
Are you mentally challenged?
I know exactly how to preserve my privacy on the net. I know exactly what the various online services know about me. That's because I have control over my data, for a broad definition of data.
The moment you take away control from me it's over.
I can concede you that's already happening with smartphones: (even though i still don't have one) my friends are leaking data about me.
Glass would be immensely worse.
[...]which destroys the privacy of anyone around you [...]
Spot on. That's the main issue with me. And don't tell me "oh but we've got smartphones already".
Glass is a whole new level of invasivity.
Slashdot's lowest point?
How can this be a sustainable business model?
No, i have no background whatsoever in economics and\or management.
Yup, a way more credible threat!
Putin has been trying to drag the US - Russian relationship back to Cold War times
Yes please, i love the cold war romantic atmosphere.
blingtables -A INPUT -s mtgox -j REJECT
blingtables -A OUTPUT -d mtgox -j REJECT
I have issues.
The United States Of America, the country that legalized bribery.
You did not disprove my point. Also, there's a reason why they are not banned by i don't remember what treaty. IIRC the reason was exactly that they are a defensive weapons system. That's true whatever facility you're defending.
S-300 is an intrinsically defensive weapon system...
I hope USAF Brigadier General Jack D. Ripper has been stripped of his nuclear authority too!
I hereby declare a Jihad against BT for their infidelity about IPv6.
They simply didn't matter enough, like a big corporation does. Not enough lobbying means you'll be judged as hard as any other citizen would be!
100 Gbits/sec? Does that even exist?! What kind of hardware you need to achieve those speeds?!
I've been successfully cultivating anti-americanism in my backyard, thanks to the constant fertilization my crops receive from news like these. Growing perfectly fine without pesticides and\or GM.
ENOUGH WITH THIS BULLSHIT! Even though *i dissent with the sentence* i must clarify that they have been charged for clearly stating that the situation was OK, that people should stay at home and that people should just ignore those pesky FORESHOCKS that lasted for MONTHS with INCREASING magnitude. I was fucking THERE at the time (well... not exactly there as i knew that we were in for quite a ride). Enough with this disinformation.