It is possible to have a binding constitution within a Westminster system - look at Australia. Might be tricky in the UK though. One way might be to have a panel of senior judges (like Germany's constitutional court) that the monarch can ask for advice on signing legislation they thought might be unconstitutional. Then amend the convention that the monarch can only act on advice of the Privy Council appropriately.
No, it's not doing what *you* think it's doing. It's not actually cracking water molecules into O2 and H2, it's separating the dissolved oxygen like fish gills. Although of course it's not doing that either because it's some design student's "ooh shiny" render and not actually a real thing, but if it was - that's what it would be doing.
It's comparable to the Eurofighter. Except that the JAS 39 NG has the much better radar.
It's in no way comparable to the Eurofighter. The JAS aircraft actually works, it's not a political football, it's not a vast waste of scarce defence money and it is fit for purpose. The Eurofighter fits none of those criteria.
The F-18 Super Hornet is a whole new beast. It's not long in the tooth at all, and the only reason it shares a designation with the original Hornet is political. They wanted to avoid the "new plane" procurement nightmare.
Slashdot Mirror
http://abstractfactory.blogspo...
They use 64 bit naming.
SkyNetDrive?
Launching tomorrow, TwoBillion-OneHundredFortySevenMillion-FourHundredEightyThreeThousand-SixHundredFortyNineDrive!
Twodrive, Threedrive, etc. The possibilities are (literally) endless!
It's a cooperative, you numpty.
It is possible to have a binding constitution within a Westminster system - look at Australia. Might be tricky in the UK though. One way might be to have a panel of senior judges (like Germany's constitutional court) that the monarch can ask for advice on signing legislation they thought might be unconstitutional. Then amend the convention that the monarch can only act on advice of the Privy Council appropriately.
In the UK? Life imprisonment without trial, under section 49 of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act.
Except where Parliament otherwise decides, like in this case.
No, it's not doing what *you* think it's doing. It's not actually cracking water molecules into O2 and H2, it's separating the dissolved oxygen like fish gills. Although of course it's not doing that either because it's some design student's "ooh shiny" render and not actually a real thing, but if it was - that's what it would be doing.
Get them to start all their passwords with A1.
What a fiasco.
Then the ones who don't abuse children can use them to take beautiful nature shots to distract themselves from their urges as therapy. Win-win!
Except I can't use my mod points now I've posted :)
So we should be giving really high res cameras to pedophiles. That way the photos they take will have more than fear in the eyes of their victims.
It's the OP's fault for putting content in the subject and not in the body.
It'll yield a lot more that's relevant to sarcastic climate denier blogs. Well done Dr Turney, another PR triumph!
Couldn't agree more. You can have a conversation on reddit too, not so easy on slashdot.
No. Hopefully this particular hopeful news article questioning doesn't last as long as the "Is this the year of Linux on the desktop?" one.
It's in no way comparable to the Eurofighter. The JAS aircraft actually works, it's not a political football, it's not a vast waste of scarce defence money and it is fit for purpose. The Eurofighter fits none of those criteria.
The F-18 Super Hornet is a whole new beast. It's not long in the tooth at all, and the only reason it shares a designation with the original Hornet is political. They wanted to avoid the "new plane" procurement nightmare.
How many divisions has the pope?
By which you mean the 1780s.
Actually that's exactly what happens when you imprison people for minor crimes - they get better and try the major ones.
F-18, not F-16. Honestly, reading the article might be too much effort but at least try reading the summary now and again.