If you save your password on the phone (so that it gets entered automatically on an app or website), then you are not really adding a second factor by proving that you have the device. For the password to be the "something you know" factor, the something needs to be something in your brain, not something stored the same device that is the "something you have" factor. Does this new setup ensure that passwords can not be saved?
This is for logging into a web site on a separate computer. Google doesn't provide any way to save your Google password on your phone and have it automatically sent to your computer, AFAIK.
Actually your saved passwords are synced from computer to phone and back again if you are signed in to chrome on both devices. Very convenient but some risk for sure.
Can't be done. Visa, Mastercard, and Amex all have clauses forbidding those cash discounts, which can cause a merchant's account to be pulled.
I'm pretty sure it can be done you just have to do it the right way. I see places all the time offer a ~2% cash discount but what you can't do is add on a 2% credit card fee.
Because coders can't stop coding. Quit adding shit for the sake of adding it. You're done, stop, move on to another project. At some point your project has evolved to a pinnacle and anything you do from there on detracts from it.
Spoken like someone who hasn't written more then a 10 line program in their life:)
Anybody who has written software would know that timelines and budgets ALWAYS push you to release software with issues you can live with for now and a list of features you want to add but just haven't gotten to yet. That is just part of the deal.
This has nothing to do with mis-management. I believe every large company with a large workforce needs to go through and cut 5% or so every now and then. It gives them an easy chance to cut the bottom performers as well as evaluate positions that might be unneeded now. Even companies that are hiring still fire people because the needs of the company change over time with a company like this.
I disagree with you when you say this wasn't worth a slashdot post. It might not be worth it to you but between the summary and your comment I learned something which is why I come here.
Did no one ready the summary? It says *gains* of 1.5 - 2 days depending on what you use the device for. So if the old chip in a lasted 5 days, the new chip in the same device would last 6.5 - 7 days.
No, the m3 processor seems to do just fine. I have the normal version (not locked down version of windows) and I like the device. Great battery life and very nice screen. I like the pen but some don't care about it so I like that it is a separate purchase. Overall has a nice feel to it since there isn't a bunch of flimsy plastic. Kind of a niche product though since it really is half way between a tablet and a laptop.
Controls much less than MS and windows 10. People choose to update whenever they feel to do so. This small red "1" tells you an update is pending, but you can just ignore it.
You can ignore it but it is more then just a little red 1 over the updates icon in the settings. The first time each day I wake and unlock unlock my iPhone running 10.3 it pops up saying there is an update and wants me to schedule it. The options are to install the update now, schedule a time a little later to install it, or 'Remind me later' which apparently mean every single day.
Even if they *didn't* get sued I don't see this going anywhere. They've already tried this with CableCard, and except for TiVos and some in-TV setups there wasn't a big debut of third-party yes-you-own-it-outright equipment.
Then, there was supposed to be an entirely software-based version of the same thing. Never even got off the planning board.
Is TiVO not a good example of people wanting it? Didn't they just get bought for 1.1 Billion?
Someone must think there is something to it...
Sorry but less then 11% of computers run XP and I personally would like to see those get off the web as they are so full of security holes they almost surly are drones in botnets.
While a cool idea I wouldn't count on the iOS implemention to actually guard any privacy ether. In order for the ramdomization to work you must:
Not be connected to WIFI (probably)
Have the phone locked (maybe, maybe not)
Have Locations services turned off (almost for sure not)
Have cell data off or removed sim card (ya right)
http://blog.airtightnetworks.c...
You lost your fait assets. Anonymity is a double edged sword, you just felt the bad edge blow.
Do some research. Fiat is government issued currency and crypto currencies are not really all that anonymous. All transactions can be followed on the chain. The only trick is matching the wallet with a real person but that isn't impossible.
I don't know where everyone else lives, but I have yet to find a free wireless or wired streaming video capable Internet connection anywhere in the place I live. I use Netflix and Hulu but I still pay a communication utility for Internet access, so while I am not paying that same provider for cable content, it still is not free. All I have done is separate the data access utility from the content provider. Cord cutting is really a misnomer, few (if any) are truly cutting the cord, they just choose to consume content as Internet data rather than TV signal.
I think the term still applies. I bet most people are like me and already pay for internet and additionally pay for cable/satellite so they are cutting one of those cords. Just because you cut one cord doesn't mean you are cutting all cords.
Do your math again. Using your numbers for a 360, if XBox Live is normally $5/mo, that's $120 for 2 years. Total cost of a 360 unsubsidized would be 120 + 299, or $419. A subsidized one would be $240 for two years + 99 = $339. So why choose an unsubsidized one if you're getting Live anyways?
For a 720, the numbers are similar, if they are correct as reported by the summary. $499 + 120 = $619 or 299 + 240 = $539.
Only question is - if you choose a subsidized model - what is the cost of XBox Live Gold after the two years are up? Is it 5, or 10?
This is not really related to the article but these numbers are off. I pre-pay for a year of Xbox live for $35 dollars a year so just buying it all outright is $369 (299 + 70). Subsidized its $99 but $15 a month for two years for a total of $459 so it costs $90 to finance it.
Slashdot Mirror
If you save your password on the phone (so that it gets entered automatically on an app or website), then you are not really adding a second factor by proving that you have the device. For the password to be the "something you know" factor, the something needs to be something in your brain, not something stored the same device that is the "something you have" factor. Does this new setup ensure that passwords can not be saved?
This is for logging into a web site on a separate computer. Google doesn't provide any way to save your Google password on your phone and have it automatically sent to your computer, AFAIK.
Actually your saved passwords are synced from computer to phone and back again if you are signed in to chrome on both devices. Very convenient but some risk for sure.
Can't be done. Visa, Mastercard, and Amex all have clauses forbidding those cash discounts, which can cause a merchant's account to be pulled.
I'm pretty sure it can be done you just have to do it the right way. I see places all the time offer a ~2% cash discount but what you can't do is add on a 2% credit card fee.
Because coders can't stop coding. Quit adding shit for the sake of adding it. You're done, stop, move on to another project. At some point your project has evolved to a pinnacle and anything you do from there on detracts from it.
Spoken like someone who hasn't written more then a 10 line program in their life :)
Anybody who has written software would know that timelines and budgets ALWAYS push you to release software with issues you can live with for now and a list of features you want to add but just haven't gotten to yet. That is just part of the deal.
This has nothing to do with mis-management. I believe every large company with a large workforce needs to go through and cut 5% or so every now and then. It gives them an easy chance to cut the bottom performers as well as evaluate positions that might be unneeded now. Even companies that are hiring still fire people because the needs of the company change over time with a company like this.
I disagree with you when you say this wasn't worth a slashdot post. It might not be worth it to you but between the summary and your comment I learned something which is why I come here.
Read again. *Gains* of 1 - 2 days over the old chip in the same device.
Did no one ready the summary? It says *gains* of 1.5 - 2 days depending on what you use the device for. So if the old chip in a lasted 5 days, the new chip in the same device would last 6.5 - 7 days.
Why would that be a shame? It says right there in the summary that is exactly what they did. "the system was tested by tracking its own officers"
It just can't work.
We can't make mesh networks effective here on the Earth's surface
Ummm, what do you think the internet is?
No, the m3 processor seems to do just fine. I have the normal version (not locked down version of windows) and I like the device. Great battery life and very nice screen. I like the pen but some don't care about it so I like that it is a separate purchase. Overall has a nice feel to it since there isn't a bunch of flimsy plastic. Kind of a niche product though since it really is half way between a tablet and a laptop.
Controls much less than MS and windows 10. People choose to update whenever they feel to do so. This small red "1" tells you an update is pending, but you can just ignore it.
You can ignore it but it is more then just a little red 1 over the updates icon in the settings. The first time each day I wake and unlock unlock my iPhone running 10.3 it pops up saying there is an update and wants me to schedule it. The options are to install the update now, schedule a time a little later to install it, or 'Remind me later' which apparently mean every single day.
Even if they *didn't* get sued I don't see this going anywhere. They've already tried this with CableCard, and except for TiVos and some in-TV setups there wasn't a big debut of third-party yes-you-own-it-outright equipment.
Then, there was supposed to be an entirely software-based version of the same thing. Never even got off the planning board.
Is TiVO not a good example of people wanting it? Didn't they just get bought for 1.1 Billion? Someone must think there is something to it...
...so I need to figure out where that 12% is that is going to be nicer then before and start buying property.
Sorry but less then 11% of computers run XP and I personally would like to see those get off the web as they are so full of security holes they almost surly are drones in botnets.
We're actually helping educate you to use the correct spelling and to double check your spelling, so you stop making your self look like a moron.
"your self" or "yourself"?
Users will be paying for it with google doing a wholesale collection of private data from those who use it.
Does it surprise you that it isn't 'free'? Sorry to burst your bubble but it wasn't 'free' before and nothing ever is.
While a cool idea I wouldn't count on the iOS implemention to actually guard any privacy ether. In order for the ramdomization to work you must: Not be connected to WIFI (probably) Have the phone locked (maybe, maybe not) Have Locations services turned off (almost for sure not) Have cell data off or removed sim card (ya right) http://blog.airtightnetworks.c...
Lack of compile time warnings. Someone should look in to it...
no paper trail, no hope
You lost your fait assets. Anonymity is a double edged sword, you just felt the bad edge blow.
Do some research. Fiat is government issued currency and crypto currencies are not really all that anonymous. All transactions can be followed on the chain. The only trick is matching the wallet with a real person but that isn't impossible.
I don't know where everyone else lives, but I have yet to find a free wireless or wired streaming video capable Internet connection anywhere in the place I live. I use Netflix and Hulu but I still pay a communication utility for Internet access, so while I am not paying that same provider for cable content, it still is not free. All I have done is separate the data access utility from the content provider. Cord cutting is really a misnomer, few (if any) are truly cutting the cord, they just choose to consume content as Internet data rather than TV signal.
I think the term still applies. I bet most people are like me and already pay for internet and additionally pay for cable/satellite so they are cutting one of those cords. Just because you cut one cord doesn't mean you are cutting all cords.
The percentage difference in thickness is enough to influence gravity at that distance to cause that many more strikes on that side? I call bs.
I think its roughly the same number of strikes but thiner crust means a bigger crater when they hit.
Do your math again. Using your numbers for a 360, if XBox Live is normally $5/mo, that's $120 for 2 years. Total cost of a 360 unsubsidized would be 120 + 299, or $419. A subsidized one would be $240 for two years + 99 = $339. So why choose an unsubsidized one if you're getting Live anyways?
For a 720, the numbers are similar, if they are correct as reported by the summary. $499 + 120 = $619 or 299 + 240 = $539.
Only question is - if you choose a subsidized model - what is the cost of XBox Live Gold after the two years are up? Is it 5, or 10?
This is not really related to the article but these numbers are off. I pre-pay for a year of Xbox live for $35 dollars a year so just buying it all outright is $369 (299 + 70). Subsidized its $99 but $15 a month for two years for a total of $459 so it costs $90 to finance it.