>We still have no idea what caused the Universe to exist
Stop please. If you had even an inkling of what you were talking about, you would know that question doesn't even make sense.
>Interestingly there are thousands of doctors that question the massive vaccination policies today, but we are not allowed to debate any of their merits because it's taught as fact that vaccines cause no harm. (also makes a few companies assloads of money, go figure...).
I would like so see studies supporting your wild claims, and the names of the "thousands" of doctors who question vaccination. On the contrary, tens of thousands of papers and studies overwhelmingly conclude vaccination is beneficial. Stop being a conspiracy nut, it's not good for you.
As it
was shown in this paper, solving the Schrödinger equation for any Schrödinger Hamiltonian is a
problem at least as hard as the hardest problems in the NP computational complexity class. This
implies that unless P and NP collapse into one class (which is very unlikely as it would imply
many startling results that are currently believed to be false), coming up with the exact solution
to Schrödinger’s equation for an arbitrary system will inevitably involve exhaustive search over an
exponentially large set of all possible candidate solutions. As a result, computational resources
required by an algorithm using brute force will grow so rapidly with the system microscopic con-
stituent particle number that bringing any additional resources to bear on the algorithm will be
just of no value. And so, for anyone living in the real physical world (of limited computational
recourses) the Schrödinger equation will turn out to be simply unsolvable for macroscopic objects
and accordingly inapplicable to their time evolution portrayal.
In other words, in the case, in which P class is not equal to NP, it is impossible to overlap de-
terministic quantum and classical descriptions in order to obtain a rigorous derivation of classical
properties from quantum mechanics.
Sure. For a userbase so keen on protecting freedoms and fighting mass surveillance and government control, fighting for silly gun rights that the big govt is trying to take you and all, you seem way to ready to take the piss out of bitcoin, and to keep holding on to fiat. I just don't get the hate.
You said it all. I would just like to add the folowing: don't forget Google doesn't pay tax on billions in profit, while using taxpayer funded roads and bus stops. Damn right these people have reasons to protest, on top of everything else.
Did you read your parent post? Is it possible that it doesn't make sense to you?? How can you be fine with protecting my right to incite violence against a group of people? Is it not EXACTLY what Hitler did in the decade prior to WWII? Again, this particular case is ridiculous, but your viewpoint is frankly disturbing...
Is it though? What lead to WWII if not a small group of men exercising their freedom of speech to the point of getting a big nation to become a murderous war machine that killed 70 million people and transformed the world as we know it?
You got to draw the line somewhere. Not saying I agree with this particular case, but freedom of speech is far from an absolutely sacred right.
Bad words are the sole thing that led to the deaths of 70 million people in 1939-1945. Bad words turned the Axis powers into murderous war machines, not anything else. You go tell the 70 million dead of WWII that Hitler's bad words can't harm anyone. You got to draw the line somewhere. Not saying I agree with this particular case, but freedom of speech is far from an absolutely sacred right.
??? What the fuck? Last time I checked, climate change was not a religious belief being shouted by loonies. It's a scientifical fact: a truth. When you say "climate change proponents" you may have the mistaken assumption that there is some kind of debate over this matter. Like the religious nuts who think there is an ongoing debate about evolution. No there is not god damn it. It's a fact!
That is a fallacious argument. I can drive at 200km/h in the motorway and reach my destination safe and sound, as I can respect all speed laws and still die on the road. Regardless, driving at 200km/h is still more dangerous than driving at 120km/h. Likewise, of course a racedriver could probably cruise at double the speed limit relatively safely, but that does not mean that it is safe to drive at those speeds. The problem is with the driver AND with the car. The Porsche is a dangerous car.
The last line of your post reminds me how much this isn't a 'news for nerds' site.
Surveillance and regulations are innefective, education is the way to go. It fails with drugs, it fails with guns, and of course, it will fail to do anything to increase attendance in a middle school.
And a major threat to anybody when used by a criminal, a loony, a mentally unstable person, a redneck "yeehaw muh guns and muh freedom", a teen/child finding it accidentally, etc.
That argument is so feeble it hurts.
In my experience I had very few bugs, none critical, even in Alpha versions of CM. Installing was a matter of flashing the custom recovery firmware, wiping system/cache in that firmware interface, and choosing the zip/tar to install on that same interface. Simple, hassle free, with a much faster, clean and even stable OS.
You don't need the exiting social and lifestyle integration. I loath it as well. Just install a clean CM and install what you need. If you're that hardcore, you don't even have to install Google Play or Google Calendar or Gmail. No "pervasive "am I happy with Google slurping this?" feeling".
I have a 100£ 1.4GHz single core phone and it suits me perfectly. I have access to the latest version of Android, I have total control of my phone and apps and I can do anything except maybe heavy gaming. I feel no need for yet another solution to an unexisting problem.
Most literature no older than 100 years looks now dated and plain boring (yes, even golden classics). Music from 2 decades ago is mostly stuff that nobody listens anymore (Yes, i know there are exceptions, but few and far between).
I'll be damned if we aren't arguing that old music and literature is inferior to today's.
The majority of people in the world oppose gay marriage. Does that mean gay marriage is wrong? The vast majority of people dislike classical music, and think it's just a posh, unintelligible thing. Does that mean classical music is bad? Heck no! And as this is slashdot: the vast majority of people use Windows. Linux is not for the "Average Joe". Does that mean Linux is valueless?
Your view is unacceptable if you are above the age of 18 or have completed secondary education. Otherwise, it's okay, teenager ravings. You'll wise up in a few years.
Slashdot Mirror
Stop please. If you had even an inkling of what you were talking about, you would know that question doesn't even make sense.
>Interestingly there are thousands of doctors that question the massive vaccination policies today, but we are not allowed to debate any of their merits because it's taught as fact that vaccines cause no harm. (also makes a few companies assloads of money, go figure...).
I would like so see studies supporting your wild claims, and the names of the "thousands" of doctors who question vaccination. On the contrary, tens of thousands of papers and studies overwhelmingly conclude vaccination is beneficial. Stop being a conspiracy nut, it's not good for you.
From TFA:
As it was shown in this paper, solving the Schrödinger equation for any Schrödinger Hamiltonian is a problem at least as hard as the hardest problems in the NP computational complexity class. This implies that unless P and NP collapse into one class (which is very unlikely as it would imply many startling results that are currently believed to be false), coming up with the exact solution to Schrödinger’s equation for an arbitrary system will inevitably involve exhaustive search over an exponentially large set of all possible candidate solutions. As a result, computational resources required by an algorithm using brute force will grow so rapidly with the system microscopic con- stituent particle number that bringing any additional resources to bear on the algorithm will be just of no value. And so, for anyone living in the real physical world (of limited computational recourses) the Schrödinger equation will turn out to be simply unsolvable for macroscopic objects and accordingly inapplicable to their time evolution portrayal.
In other words, in the case, in which P class is not equal to NP, it is impossible to overlap de- terministic quantum and classical descriptions in order to obtain a rigorous derivation of classical properties from quantum mechanics.
Sure. For a userbase so keen on protecting freedoms and fighting mass surveillance and government control, fighting for silly gun rights that the big govt is trying to take you and all, you seem way to ready to take the piss out of bitcoin, and to keep holding on to fiat. I just don't get the hate.
You said it all. I would just like to add the folowing: don't forget Google doesn't pay tax on billions in profit, while using taxpayer funded roads and bus stops. Damn right these people have reasons to protest, on top of everything else.
Fuck altruism. You did something for something that is not money? You deserve to get "sucker" tatooed on your arm!
Hitler. Hitler. Hitler and an anti-racism law. Hitler. I will leave you to figure out what's wrong there.
Did you read your parent post? Is it possible that it doesn't make sense to you?? How can you be fine with protecting my right to incite violence against a group of people? Is it not EXACTLY what Hitler did in the decade prior to WWII? Again, this particular case is ridiculous, but your viewpoint is frankly disturbing...
Is it though? What lead to WWII if not a small group of men exercising their freedom of speech to the point of getting a big nation to become a murderous war machine that killed 70 million people and transformed the world as we know it? You got to draw the line somewhere. Not saying I agree with this particular case, but freedom of speech is far from an absolutely sacred right.
Bad words are the sole thing that led to the deaths of 70 million people in 1939-1945. Bad words turned the Axis powers into murderous war machines, not anything else. You go tell the 70 million dead of WWII that Hitler's bad words can't harm anyone. You got to draw the line somewhere. Not saying I agree with this particular case, but freedom of speech is far from an absolutely sacred right.
??? What the fuck? Last time I checked, climate change was not a religious belief being shouted by loonies. It's a scientifical fact: a truth. When you say "climate change proponents" you may have the mistaken assumption that there is some kind of debate over this matter. Like the religious nuts who think there is an ongoing debate about evolution. No there is not god damn it. It's a fact!
A person exposing their viewpoint: 2 points. An angry rant devoid of substance, rife with needless expletives and insults: 5 points.
That is a fallacious argument. I can drive at 200km/h in the motorway and reach my destination safe and sound, as I can respect all speed laws and still die on the road. Regardless, driving at 200km/h is still more dangerous than driving at 120km/h. Likewise, of course a racedriver could probably cruise at double the speed limit relatively safely, but that does not mean that it is safe to drive at those speeds. The problem is with the driver AND with the car. The Porsche is a dangerous car. The last line of your post reminds me how much this isn't a 'news for nerds' site.
Because the world does not revolve around your arse?
If you have rooted it, as I assume a /. user would have, there are a million apps to uninstall preinstalled apps, for example: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.jumobile.manager.systemapp&hl=en
Just be careful not to uninstall the Phone app or something.
That is wrong. You can update any preinstalled app as if it were a Google Play app. Stop spreading bullshit you shill.
Feeling anti-joke, are we?
Surveillance and regulations are innefective, education is the way to go. It fails with drugs, it fails with guns, and of course, it will fail to do anything to increase attendance in a middle school.
Because this is, erm, /. Muh guns and muh freedon yeehaw motherfucker.
And a major threat to anybody when used by a criminal, a loony, a mentally unstable person, a redneck "yeehaw muh guns and muh freedom", a teen/child finding it accidentally, etc. That argument is so feeble it hurts.
I'll have to [citation needed] on that.
Guns are, however, what makes belligerent people dangerous. Hence the focus on extensive background checks.
In my experience I had very few bugs, none critical, even in Alpha versions of CM. Installing was a matter of flashing the custom recovery firmware, wiping system/cache in that firmware interface, and choosing the zip/tar to install on that same interface. Simple, hassle free, with a much faster, clean and even stable OS.
You don't need the exiting social and lifestyle integration. I loath it as well. Just install a clean CM and install what you need. If you're that hardcore, you don't even have to install Google Play or Google Calendar or Gmail. No "pervasive "am I happy with Google slurping this?" feeling". I have a 100£ 1.4GHz single core phone and it suits me perfectly. I have access to the latest version of Android, I have total control of my phone and apps and I can do anything except maybe heavy gaming. I feel no need for yet another solution to an unexisting problem.
Most literature no older than 100 years looks now dated and plain boring (yes, even golden classics). Music from 2 decades ago is mostly stuff that nobody listens anymore (Yes, i know there are exceptions, but few and far between).
I'll be damned if we aren't arguing that old music and literature is inferior to today's.
The majority of people in the world oppose gay marriage. Does that mean gay marriage is wrong? The vast majority of people dislike classical music, and think it's just a posh, unintelligible thing. Does that mean classical music is bad? Heck no! And as this is slashdot: the vast majority of people use Windows. Linux is not for the "Average Joe". Does that mean Linux is valueless? Your view is unacceptable if you are above the age of 18 or have completed secondary education. Otherwise, it's okay, teenager ravings. You'll wise up in a few years.