Slashdot Mirror


Google Attacks Microsoft Again: Android 4.4 Ships With Quickoffice

An anonymous reader writes "With Android 4.4 KitKat, Google's biggest blow to Microsoft isn't against Windows Phone. It's against Microsoft Office. You see, KitKat ships with Quickoffice, letting you edit Microsoft Office documents, spreadsheets, and presentations on the go, without paying a dime, straight out of the box. This tidbit was largely lost in the news yesterday, given the large number of improvements and new features that KitKat offers. Yet it's a very big deal: every Android user that upgrades to KitKat will get Google's Quickoffice, and every new Android device (starting with the Nexus 5) that ships with KitKat or higher will also get Quickoffice."

178 comments

  1. But I don't want it. by richy+freeway · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Is this optional or am I required to have it taking up space on my Nexus 4 regardless?

    1. Re:But I don't want it. by nogginthenog · · Score: 1

      It's already installed (in 4.3 at least). Open a pdf or a word doc and QuickOffice will view it.

    2. Re:But I don't want it. by siddesu · · Score: 2

      It was better when it wasn't Google's -- it worked offline and without the need for a G+ account. I'm glad they didn't buy the better office package for Android, Office Suite Pro.

    3. Re:But I don't want it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
      Oh, hey look! Google responds to the MS/Apple/ axis patent attack by assaulting Microsoft and viciously giving people a really good product for free!

      Fuck them! Now I'll complain about the space it takes up!

    4. Re:But I don't want it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not just uninstall it, if they do happen to install it on your phone?

    5. Re:But I don't want it. by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Screw both MS and Google, I'm using Open Office. Opens and saves all formats just fine, exports easily to PDF and I don't have to be online to use it. It would be handy to open a Word doc or Oo doc on my phone, though, although I certainly wouldn't want to write or edit on a phone.

    6. Re:But I don't want it. by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Maybe not on a phone, but a tablet in landscape mode with a USB or Bluetooth keyboard? Why not?

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    7. Re:But I don't want it. by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Because you can't.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    8. Re:But I don't want it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously this is one of the most trollish headlines I have seen on /. in awhile. And that's no easy feat

    9. Re:But I don't want it. by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2

      The way Android is structured, some apps are in a read-write filesystem and can be uninstalled, some are in 'ROM' (a read-only filesystem in the flash that is only modified when you do a firmware update) and so can't be uninstalled. As of Android 4, they can be hidden from the UI, but they're still there (and there have been instances where 'disabled' apps still had exploitable vulnerabilities).

      I'd love to be able to buy an Android tablet with an absolute minimum of things in the ROM image and everything else installed in an upgradeable form.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    10. Re:But I don't want it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is this optional or am I required to have it taking up space on my Nexus 4 regardless?

      It's ok, you don't need space. Those google assholes think you should store everything in "THE CLOUD"
      Now, back to getting this MTP crap working.......

    11. Re:But I don't want it. by feranick · · Score: 2

      That is the stock quickoffice viewer. What we are talking about here is the editor, which is a separate app. It's free in the play store for any android 2.2+:

      https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.quickoffice.android&hl=en

    12. Re:But I don't want it. by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Is this optional or am I required to have it taking up space on my Nexus 4 regardless?

      It'll be part of the firmware... I.E. taking up space you can't access/use for anything, anyhow.

      Kingsoft Office is also free and handles Microsoft Office formats, too.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    13. Re:But I don't want it. by moronoxyd · · Score: 1

      The way Android is structured, some apps are in a read-write filesystem and can be uninstalled, some are in 'ROM' (a read-only filesystem in the flash that is only modified when you do a firmware update)

      Usually you can remove pre-installed apps once you rooted your android device, as that gives you the option to get read-write access to this 'ROM'.
      Only on a few devices with unusual partition schemes does that not work.

    14. Re: But I don't want it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because I have a laptop or a netbook?

    15. Re: But I don't want it. by andrepd · · Score: 1

      Because the world does not revolve around your arse?

    16. Re:But I don't want it. by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      the viewer was always free, iirc.

      quickoffice sold itself to google right after they ran out of steady stream of money coming from nokia and due to some nokians benefiting from that arrangement it took 2 years longer than was supposed to get ms versions of ms document viewers on symbians....

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    17. Re:But I don't want it. by Patch86 · · Score: 1

      It came pre-installed on my 2.1 Sony Ericcson X10 Mini Pro. Is this really "new" news?

    18. Re:But I don't want it. by molnarcs · · Score: 1

      Is this optional or am I required to have it taking up space on my Nexus 4 regardless?

      What a tribulation!

    19. Re:But I don't want it. by siddesu · · Score: 1

      That's fine on the notebook, but it isn't available on paranoid android yet ;)

    20. Re: But I don't want it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well if you make his arse the central reference point then yes it does, but really you shouldn't be so fixated on his arse in a public forum.

  2. Microsoft all over again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I for one, welcome our new extending embracing and extinguishing Overlords.

    1. Re:Microsoft all over again by Reaperducer · · Score: 1, Insightful

      My SonyEricsson m600c did this back in 2006. Is this what passes for "innovation" at Google these days?

      --
      -- I'm old enough to have lived through six different meanings of the word "hacker."
  3. Is Google upgrading Quickoffice at all? by hsmith · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Since they acquired them it seems they have dumped no money into improvements. While it is an office editing App, it really needs some work to be "great." Granted, it is much more functional than Microsofts Office 365 backed App.

    1. Re:Is Google upgrading Quickoffice at all? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      i have no microsoft products. and yet when microsoft bought Nokia they push their POS mobile office and skydrive to my N8.

      It is like a virus that keeps trying to install itself, and cannot be deleted (without major under the hood pain).

      Google is simply trying to redress the balance... And besides, how many Office features do we all need on a phone...;-)

    2. Re:Is Google upgrading Quickoffice at all? by mrchaotica · · Score: 2

      It allegedly has some sort of integration with Google Drive (assuming that counts as an "improvement").

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    3. Re:Is Google upgrading Quickoffice at all? by occasional_dabbler · · Score: 1

      I'm not calling you out here, but I'm interested in your post. Firstly the Skydrive app (although it seems it isn't very good) has been available for Symbian since long before there was any talk of a buyout. Secondly, MS have NOT yet bought Nokia, they have cleared some of the hurdles but there's still a long way to go and at the moment they have to be seen to be independent, now more than ever (hence Nokia's Surface RT killer) Please provide citations.

      --
      "Our opponent is an alien starship packed with atomic bombs," I said. "we have a protractor"
  4. Google Uses Quick Office... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's NOT super effective.

    Let's get real. An office-ish app on a smart phone is NOT a challenge to a full blown desktop office suite. To suggest that it is indicates an absolute lack of understanding of the user base and use cases for office suites.

    1. Re:Google Uses Quick Office... by nurb432 · · Score: 2

      Not a challenge, but a requirement to be competitive.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    2. Re:Google Uses Quick Office... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So plug that mini-HDMI into your TV and get a Bluetooth keyboard. Is that challenge enough for you?

    3. Re:Google Uses Quick Office... by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 1

      I think you're the one with the lack of understanding. It's not on the phone for document creation, it's there so you can look at that attachment to your e-mail without running to a PC.

    4. Re:Google Uses Quick Office... by Rob+Y. · · Score: 1

      Right. If anything, having an MSOffice-compatible app on Android phones just deepens the entrenchment of MSOffice, ratifying it's document formats as the one and only standard. Not saying they're not already enough of a standard that it's not important to be able to work with them - just that this isn't a challenge to Office. More of a challenge to using Office as a competitive advantage for Windows phone.

      All this does is check the box of being able to open and make small edits to MSO documents on your phone. Assuming no app is going to provide full-featured support for editing office docs (on a phone - tablets with keyboards are another story), this is probably enough to prevent some free MS-provided app from giving Windows Phone a leg up that they wouldn't have without the MS desktop/office monopolies. If anybody is hurt by this, it'd be Apple, which doesn't have a similar free tool (yet?).

      --
      Posted from my Android phone. Oh, I can change this? There, that's better...
    5. Re:Google Uses Quick Office... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      iWork is Apple's entry in opening and reading Office docs. It was released free of charge recently.

      I've always found having some utility that can open PDFs, Word docs, Excel spreadsheets, and others pretty good to have. Even before smartphones, Pocket Word and Pocket Excel came in handy because there is always that one person who sends virtually everything in .doc or .docx format as opposed to a message.

      Now for writing documents, it can be done on a smartphone, but it is fairly painful, especially without a sliding keyboard. A tablet is a little bit easier, especially with a Bluetooth keyboard, but nothing beats a desktop or laptop PC with the relatively big screen, and multitasking OS. On the desktop, other office suites are 99% interoperable, which means that there is always that formatting error on a detailed document which makes it useless.

      MS Office is like AutoCAD or Adobe Acrobat. It may not be the best, but if you want to play in the industry, you have to use those utilities, period. Especially with legal documents.

      Same with Exchange. It isn't the greatest, but good luck trying to run an E-mail system without it.

    6. Re:Google Uses Quick Office... by cjjjer · · Score: 3, Funny

      Who in the fuck wants to carry a TV and a keyboard around with them?

    7. Re:Google Uses Quick Office... by CFBMoo1 · · Score: 0

      * Portable folding keyboard, bluetooth
      * Portable mouse, bluetooth
      * HDMI cable. HDMI flat screens are all around these days.

      That isn't that much to carry around in a back pack or brief case.

      --
      ~~ Behold the flying cow with a rail gun! ~~
    8. Re:Google Uses Quick Office... by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 1

      I agree, but consider also how impossible it now becomes for MS to make money from Office on portable devices. Sure, it isn't (yet) very relevant to sales on PCs and full notebooks, but that's not exactly the growth segment in the computer market. And when you consider that the typical young person has an Android phone before they ever get a PC. When they get around to buying one, you can sort of imagine that a future, better version of Quickoffice on the PC might feel to them like the document editor to try first.

    9. Re:Google Uses Quick Office... by recoiledsnake · · Score: 2

      So where is the "attack" in the headline coming from, then? If anything Google just made Office on laptops and desktops more attractive by shipping a viewer for them by default on Android.

      --
      This space for rent.
    10. Re:Google Uses Quick Office... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Android is not only smartphones. You can get a 10" tablet with a keyboard. That is practically a small portable PC. Or you can get a laptop-sized thin with android and an ARM processor instead of x86. If all you need is a word processor, you don't really need a windows PC anymore. (Actually, windows hasn't been needed for a long time, but android means the user don't need to be a linux geek to use an alternative.)

    11. Re:Google Uses Quick Office... by Dahan · · Score: 1

      The point is that if editing documents on the phone is important to you, you'd buy a device that did have a way to output video to a larger screen. (My Android phone can do that, although I have no use for the feature and have never tried it... I bought it because it was cheap--LG Nexus 4)

    12. Re:Google Uses Quick Office... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hdmi - maybe not, don't know. but my cable that plugs into the headphone port and has 3 rca plugs for left/right and video hooks up to a TV just fine. that's on the galaxy line starting with the old galaxy s1. maybe.. if you googled it?

    13. Re:Google Uses Quick Office... by mcrbids · · Score: 1

      Came here to say this. I have a bluetooth iGo Stowaway originally intended for BlackBerry but it works great with my Android device. The screen on my Razr Maxx HD is pretty decent; I generally don't feel the need for a screen, although I generally carry an HDMI cable so I can Netflix in the Hotel.

      I recently replaced the computer in my bedroom with an Android "TV stick" that makes my 32" TV into a "smart" TV without all the $$ and all the hassle. In large part, I've entered the post-PC era, where much (perhaps most?) of my computing is done on a non-MS device and I don't care much about X86 compatibility except for "legacy apps" like video games.

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    14. Re:Google Uses Quick Office... by mcrbids · · Score: 1

      PS: My TV stick uses something like 3% of the power of my previous, PC-based solution. The PC would wheeze with fans because of the load of Netflix, the new solution (the size of a thumb drive) is too small to have a fan and doesn't need it.

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    15. Re:Google Uses Quick Office... by vandamme · · Score: 1

      Wait...if I can edit documents on my phone for free...maybe I can do it on my PC? >

  5. War between Google and Microsoft getting hotter. by boorack · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In other news patent cartel created by Microsoft and Apple attacks Google and others. Somewhat sad to see when one side of this battle uses product superiority and the other one resorts to lawyers and patent trolls. It just underscores roteness and corrupion of US corporate economy.

  6. Documents shared with Google? by mbone · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Is processing for Quickoffice done off-phone? Or, to put it another way, does Quickoffice share all of your work with Google?

    1. Re:Documents shared with Google? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I don't know, but if you email it with Google or use Google Drive, they have it anyway (ditto for Dropbox, etc). So if you use either of those, you've already decided you accept it. And Office 365 is definitely cloud-based, so this can only be the same or better.

    2. Re:Documents shared with Google? by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      The copy I bought a few months ago wasn't connected to Google Drive, so I'm pretty sure it does its own processing and rendering. It is usable, and good in a pinch, but no replacement for a full office suite. But what do It need a full office suite on a Nexus 7 for anyways?

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    3. Re:Documents shared with Google? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is processing for Quickoffice done off-phone? Or, to put it another way, does Quickoffice share all of your work with Google?

      According to the rumor mongering tech press Google has great Cloud plans for QuickOffice, and knowing Google they will be dissecting your work for their own purposes. One thing is for sure, when you sign up for any free Google services (or any other free online services for that matter) you should expect to end up paying for it with a chunk of your privacy. This should not surprise anybody (although it surprisingly often does) since running a service like QuickOffice costs money and Google has to pay for it somehow. If you, the customer, are not paying money for the service Google has to get it's pound of flesh in some other way. The best part is that if you believe the /. heretics that have not yet seen the light and joined the 1st. Slashdot Church of Google, Google will be sharing all of your work with the NSA.

    4. Re:Documents shared with Google? by Planesdragon · · Score: 3, Informative

      Quickoffice was a document-editing program way back in the PalmOS days, and it was the only major player to make a WebOS version.

      Quickoffice does not require Google Docs to work. Although it does have some features which are counter-intuitive and don't work depending on the view you're in.

    5. Re:Documents shared with Google? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      I've been using QuickOffice since I bought it for my Palm 3. No, it is, or it was, completely stand-alone. Since Google bought it, it's hard to say, though.

    6. Re:Documents shared with Google? by mbone · · Score: 4, Informative

      If you are not paying for it, you are not the customer.

    7. Re:Documents shared with Google? by ilsaloving · · Score: 1

      It used to be a standalone app before Google bought them, so I would guess no. But now that Google owns them, all bets are off.

    8. Re:Documents shared with Google? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it doesn't require google docs to work, why do you have to create a google account to use it?

    9. Re:Documents shared with Google? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google is as bad as MS. Docs edited with their tools will be sent to the mothership so that appropriate guidance, sorry adverts can be sent to the user.

        IMHO, and as bad as it seems, do a bit with stuff from one company, something else with stuff from a different company. Then at least hopefully you don't have all your eggs in one basket and consequently at their mercy (for exanple Adobe and their move to a subscription model)

    10. Re:Documents shared with Google? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      That's sometimes blurry though. For older mobile phone operating systems, I wasn't the customer of the software vendor, but the hardware vendor that sold me the phone was. It's not obvious to someone buying an Android phone that the manufacturer is not the customer of the OS vendor, and therefore that they are not indirectly the customer. After all, they're handing over money for the device, they'd expect to be the customer.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    11. Re:Documents shared with Google? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are not paying for it, you are not the customer.

      If you don't know what the price paid is, you ARE the price paid.

    12. Re:Documents shared with Google? by recoiledsnake · · Score: 1

      Which is why the biased headline, summary and article are nonsense. This is not even going to make a dent in Office, forget about "attacking" it.

      --
      This space for rent.
    13. Re:Documents shared with Google? by Joining+Yet+Again · · Score: 1

      If you don't know who the idiot in the room is, you ARE the idiot.

  7. OK with me... by unique_parrot · · Score: 4, Informative

    ...these medialess new microsoft office versions, where you have to make an account just to download the installer is a pita.

    And only being able to upgrade to win 8.1 with the market, not by windows update??? can't download the service pack to a stick??

    And the switch to monthly subscription for office is a very bad thing, i hope people realize this aswell!

    i hope ms get's a salted bill for all this.

    1. Re:OK with me... by number17 · · Score: 1

      And only being able to upgrade to win 8.1 with the market, not by windows update???

      Apple beats the same drum. OSX 10.9 can be had from the Store, not Software Updates.
      http://www.apple.com/osx/how-to-upgrade/

      can't download the service pack to a stick??

      Corporate customers download the ISO. Retail customers get the shaft. Super hard shaft if you live in the sticks. No idea if Apple does the same.

    2. Re: OK with me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OSX 10.9 can be downloaded once (for free) then copied onto an installer drive (eg USB memory stick), so not quite an "ISO" but essentially the same thing.

      The process is simple but not trivial:

      http://m.cnet.com/news/how-to-create-a-bootable-os-x-mavericks-usb-install-drive/57608836?ds=1

    3. Re: OK with me... by unique_parrot · · Score: 2

      yeah, there is a simple but not trivial version for the installation of windows 8.1 (if you want to reinstall from version 8) aswell:
      Install 8.1 from chip.de instruction [englich translation]
      But this definitly not customer friendly.

    4. Re:OK with me... by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      i hope people realize this aswell!

      i hope ms get's a salted bill for all this.

      No caps, "aswell" and a grocer's apostrophe... what grade are you in, kid? If you're trying to look cool, you're not succeeding.

      Yeah, mod me down for trying to educate someone at a nerd site...

    5. Re:OK with me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe it's because Mavericks and Mountain Lion are two distinctly different OS paths? Oddly I don't see your ilk bitching about it when Linux does the same. When that happens the answer is obvious to anyone who isn't a "fucktard." Apple does it and you people suddenly have the comprehensive skills of a 4 year old and act smug while making yourselves look like jackasses.

    6. Re:OK with me... by westlake · · Score: 1

      And the switch to monthly subscription for office is a very bad thing, i hope people realize this as well!

      I don't see the problem here.

      Office 365 Home Premium $99/yr.

      5 PCs and/or Macs + any five mobile devices + your Windows phones.
      MS Office Pro, full versions of every program, locally resident and always up to date.
      MS Office Anywhere, full versions of every program, streamed on demand to any Win7/8 PC.
      MS Office Web and Office on Mobile Devices.
      20 GB of SkyDrive Storage
      60 minutes of global Skype calls per month.

      If you are a college student, Office 365 University is $80 for four years with an option to renew in the third year.

      If you are a NPO, Office 365 can be yours for free. Office 365 for Nonprofits

      If you need a managed turn-key HIPPA compliant medical office system Microsoft has you covered. Microsoft Office 365 for Health Organizations

    7. Re:OK with me... by unique_parrot · · Score: 2

      i'm sorry but english is not my first language.

    8. Re:OK with me... by mspohr · · Score: 2

      Considering that you can get all of this for free from multiple sources for multiple platforms, the $99/year looks like a ripoff.
      Some years ago Bill Gates, in a moment of wishful thinking, said that hardware was trending towards free while software was where the real money could be made.
      At the time I didn't believe it and today we have a situation where most software is free (and hardware is cheap). This kind of undercuts Microsoft's business model.
      I can't remember the last time I bought any software. Everything I use is free (and most open source).

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    9. Re:OK with me... by unique_parrot · · Score: 1

      really?
      come on, it's (just) office. you get it for free on apple, android and pc (with libreoffice).
      although, the price is not what i meant in my post, it is the business model of "getting people to accept a (future) monthly fee" what disturbs me.
      maybe i get too old or i'm just too disillusionized, i don't know.

    10. Re:OK with me... by unique_parrot · · Score: 1

      Oh, just after hitting the submit button i realized the capital (mistake), didn't want to upset you :)

    11. Re: OK with me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well then y'alls been edumacted. We's ain't not speaking the kings english here's in the Midwest either.

    12. Re:OK with me... by unique_parrot · · Score: 1

      This reminds me of the sm(s) business model: You already could send emails a few mb large (for almost free of charge) in pc world, then someone came and thought Yeah, i would like to make same kind of this service with mobile phones as well. In the beginning sms were quite expensive, for just 160 (i think) letters!
      But, to my surprise, it worked out...

    13. Re:OK with me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you kidding? Microsoft's new distribution and installation method is the easiest they have ever made it. Personally, I've moved entirely off of Google services, onto Microsoft services. I've also spent much of this year migrating clients off of google apps and onto Microsoft live domains. SkyDrive is a huge benefit for small and medium sized businesses, and the deep account integration makes life much easier for customers. Microsoft may have taken their sweet ass time finding a good direction to go in, but they've done a good job of it. The learning curve is the only stumbling block, and that's temporary.

    14. Re:OK with me... by Tony+Isaac · · Score: 1

      where you have to make an account just to download the installer

      You also have to have a Google account to download QuickOffice.

    15. Re:OK with me... by AJWM · · Score: 1

      SMS was expensive in the beginning because it used a part of the messaging protocol that was not really intended for high volume, and the telcos hadn't configured things to support it. But it beat hell out of the old text paging services.

      Once the telcos figured out the demand and started configuring the hardware and software to facilitate it, the price dropped. Almost everyone just bundles unlimited messaging into their phone plan these days, don't they?

      --
      -- Alastair
    16. Re:OK with me... by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Then I'm sure you appreciate the information. Here's another tip: there are an awful lot of uneducated people on the internet, don't mimic them. Just do it like your teachers and books taught.

  8. Eh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People have been able to edit those formats for years without having to pay a dime. How is this an attack on microsoft, just because this is on a mobile OS? Who wants to edit such files on-the-go anyway?

    1. Re:Eh by Desler · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's not. This is simply click bait.

    2. Re:Eh by dwater · · Score: 2

      It's been considered a fairly useful capability since it was on Symbian...how long ago was it on that platform?? Too long ago to remember. This is nothing new apart from it's Google and Android, and perhaps the pervasiveness of the platform.

      Ah, I see it was 2005 and Google discontinued it for Symbian :

      http://www.allaboutsymbian.com/flow/item/18412_Quickoffice_officially_discont.php

      I find this sentence in Wikipedia interesting/disappointing :

      "The programs are compatible with Microsoft Office file format, but not the OpenDocument standard."

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quickoffice

      --
      Max.
  9. Since when healthy competition is an attack? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's microsoft that attacks everyone with patents and fud.

  10. I smell antitrust lawsuits by GauteL · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In many markets Google has a near monopoly position. Their global smart phone market share is around 80% and in some markets it's even higher. Bundling an office suite in order to leverage their dominant operating system is unlikely to sit well with regulators.

    1. Re:I smell antitrust lawsuits by bjwest · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Wouldn't that only apply if MS made an Android office app, and Google was preventing the user from installing it?

      I don't see how it could be considered antitrust to create something that competes with nothing.

      --

      --- Keep the choice with the user..
    2. Re:I smell antitrust lawsuits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Netscape and Java ran on Windows, does MS Office run on Android? If there's no other products in the market, Google aren't competing against anyone and competition law cannot apply.

    3. Re:I smell antitrust lawsuits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not a convincing antitrust argument; you're reasoning from a rough estimate of market share alone (and not even market share in a particular country) and you're saying "bundling" without making the case for why adding this feature constitutes bundling for antitrust law purposes. It's a far cry from the pervasive integration of IE into Windows, for example.

      My prediction is that there will be no antitrust issues; perhaps a few French closet nationalist policitians will add this news to their "throw everything at Google and see what sticks" approach.

    4. Re:I smell antitrust lawsuits by timmyf2371 · · Score: 1

      The mere bundling of Internet Explorer and latterly Windows Media Player with Windows was enough to be classed as anti trust, because MS were deemed to be trying to use a monopoly position in one market to secure a monopoly position in another market.

      In this case, Google could quite easily be seen to be trying to use a dominant position in the smartphone market to extend their dominance into the mobile office app market.

      --

      Backup not found: (A)bort (R)etry (P)anic
    5. Re:I smell antitrust lawsuits by timmyf2371 · · Score: 1

      Even a quick and basic search of Google Play apps reveals there to be quite a number of competing products in the market. MS doesn't have one, so it clearly wouldn't have a case. The makers of Kingsoft Office and Officesuite 7 may well have a case.

      --

      Backup not found: (A)bort (R)etry (P)anic
    6. Re:I smell antitrust lawsuits by div_2n · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily. It really depends on how they do the integration. If they set the application default behavior to always open docs with QuickOffice, then maybe. But if they leave it as an option and you have to manually select to always use QuickOffice then I would venture to guess there's virtually no chance a suit would be filed and even less of a chance of it being successful if someone does.

    7. Re:I smell antitrust lawsuits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In many markets Google has a near monopoly position. Their global smart phone market share is around 80% and in some markets it's even higher. Bundling an office suite in order to leverage their dominant operating system is unlikely to sit well with regulators.

      Didnt work well for MSFT, and that was for browsers, which Google also bundles

    8. Re:I smell antitrust lawsuits by UnknowingFool · · Score: 4, Informative

      Um. No it was not. MS did not get in trouble merely by bundling IE with Windows. They got in trouble for threatening partners and OEMs not to do business with competitors like Netscape and Java. For example, OEMs could lose licensing rights to Windows if they installed Netscape. MS hinted to Intel that they would give preferences to AMD in the next version of Windows if Intel released an optimized JVM for Java.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  11. Great - now google can send you ads based.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    ..on what office docs you edit.

    Thanks google!

  12. wp8 w/ office by proxie · · Score: 1

    pretty sure when i tried out the nokia wp8 phone it came with office on it preinstalled..? for the record.. i really did try to give wp8 a shot, however, i have since switched back to droid

    1. Re:wp8 w/ office by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Surprisingly enough, I found WP8 quite enjoyable. My Android phone has been collecting dust since then. The Modern UI is shit on desktop, but works great on mobile.

    2. Re:wp8 w/ office by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      Just out of curiousity , how much does Redmond pay you per post. I'm thinking about surrendering all sense of decency or honor and astroturfing for Redmond.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    3. Re:wp8 w/ office by recoiledsnake · · Score: 1

      Some day you'll realize that people have different tastes and experiences.

      --
      This space for rent.
  13. quickoffice is free and available to any Android by feranick · · Score: 4, Informative

    The version that allows for editing MS docs has been recently released in the play store for any android user. Kitkat only has it installed by default, but otherwise it's one install away.

  14. A toxic post by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 0

    Come on, anti-trust people and European regulators! "How dare they do this anti-competitive bundling!!2!2111!!!!"

    Feel that burning rage that makes you want to pound the keyboard and mod me down? Free speech working as intended.

    Now answer the question! How dare they? Answer it!

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    1. Re:A toxic post by connor4312 · · Score: 1

      Feel that burning rage that makes you want to pound the keyboard and mod me down? Free speech working as intended.

      Mods might possibly want to do so, because your comment is blatant flamebait (as I see it). If you feel the need to dare the mods to downvote you, you may want to considering saying something else, or not saying anything at all.

      "-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview" may not to an option, but "-1: Flamebait" is.

    2. Re:A toxic post by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Agreed, Impy is indeed trolling. But OTOH you bit his troll.

    3. Re:A toxic post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I personally have used many android office suite apps to create work documents, or any general note on my phone and tablets. Editing them of course is also handy. Adobe echosign requires you to open a document to insert digital signatures; so having extra pdf capabilities besides viewing on a phone is always handy.

      is it the FULL version of office suite? because microsoft gives ytou the student version free with windows and it expires and what not... which is still worse either way than googles sitaution; but i imagine theyd only give you the basic one... or limit some functions.

      I have the full version and like it more than polaris or kingsoft.

      Truly though whoever's point it was that microsoft could've made an app for android was the right one

  15. Apple not MS by grub · · Score: 5, Insightful


    This is more of an attack against Apple giving away the iWork package for free. MS is barely a blip on the radar.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:Apple not MS by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      "Response to" or "copy of" fit rather better than "attack against". It's reactive, not aggressive.

  16. Hardly a big deal by timmyf2371 · · Score: 1

    This is probably about as big a deal as Apple giving away their office suite and iLife package to new customers; nice to have, but not a decision maker.

    There are so many different use cases for smartphones and I haven't personally heard any friends or colleagues saying that the ability to edit MS Office apps is anywhere near the top of the list.

    For tablet devices, the situation is different and it makes sense for Google to catch up with Microsoft and Apple who already offer free versions of their office software to tablet purchasers. Though if the decision comes down to MS Office RT vs QuickOffice, I know which one I'm going to pick - and it's not the Google ersion.

    --

    Backup not found: (A)bort (R)etry (P)anic
  17. quickoffice by l3v1 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Quickoffice? How is ths news? Not long back they made it free, and we even got free extra Google Drive space for downloading and installing it. And it doesn't need to be KitKat, it works with earlier versions as well.

    Again, how is this news?

    Right.

    --
    I am putting myself to the fullest possible use, which is all I can think that any conscious entity can ever hope to do.
    1. Re:quickoffice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      slashvertisement

    2. Re:quickoffice by mewsenews · · Score: 2

      I knew there would be at least one comment downplaying this story.

      This is a tiny move on Google's part with huge ramifications.

      Android has been a huge success, I read that it has something like 80% of the market share of mobile devices, but that statistic was probably made up.

      When Grandma opens an email on her tablet thing that her IT grandson told her to get so that he could stop supporting her Windows computer, she's going to be opening the word attachment using Google software - and then possibly editing it and sending it back - using Google software.

      Microsoft gets nothing, they are removed from the loop.

      The default office suite on Android could be as important as the default web browser on Windows - and we know what a ruckus that caused.

    3. Re:quickoffice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hardly consider this as news, either. QuickOffice came already pre-installed on my HTC Legend three years ago.

  18. and forcing OEMs, "IE cannot open Netscape.com" by raymorris · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Bundling it where it can't be removed, preventing OEMs from installing other browsers, a patch to prevent downloading Netscape ...

  19. Why? by Skiron · · Score: 1

    The last bloody thing I want to do when out walking, or in a pub or on the bus or anything else when out and about is the bloody well create a word processing document or spreadsheet or what ever.

    Geez, what's going on in the world?

    1. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention the prospect of editing a document using a virtual touchscreen keyboard. What sadist came up with that idea?

    2. Re:Why? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      Wow, those EULAs are getting tough if they require you to do that.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    3. Re:Why? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Of course you won't want to create one, but you might want to read one someone sends as an email attachment.

    4. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's just the Robber barons 2.0, using the latest electonic whip on you to get free labour - think you'll get paid for it?

      you are either deluded or an optimist (i'll give you the benefit of being the latter)

  20. Wrong Analogy by tuppe666 · · Score: 1

    I for one, welcome our new extending embracing and extinguishing Overlords.

    Google would have to adopt Open Document Format and extend the specification from a monopoly position!! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embrace,_extend_and_extinguish . I don't thing you understand. The worst part of this is we don't have a standard we have the mess of OOXML after Microsoft polluted the integrity of of ISO to its incredible shame. To protect 60% of its profits from its Office compatibility scam. This in someway goes to expose this scam.

  21. Dominant in Market by tuppe666 · · Score: 1

    It's NOT super effective.

    Let's get real. An office-ish app on a smart phone is NOT a challenge to a full blown desktop office suite. To suggest that it is indicates an absolute lack of understanding of the user base and use cases for office suites.

    Its not just a challenge its a threat to 60% of Microsofts Profits. Right now Android passed 1 Billion activations in September(windows is about 1.2Billion), while Microsoft thinks delaying its suite to get people to buy their OS. If you don't think its a treaty then you do not understand how people use Office.

    1. Re:Dominant in Market by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure the GP does understand how people use Office, which is why he doesn't think a smartphone app is in any way a challenge to a desktop office suite.

      Quite honestly, the only value I've ever seen in smartphone and tablet office apps is viewing content or making absolutely minor modifications. And quite honestly, I'd say even that is a minority concern, most people lose interest the moment they install a "free office suite" and find out, in practice, how much of a PITA the touch UI is for creating content.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  22. Google are bastards by tuppe666 · · Score: 1

    How has Apples iwork annouced on Slashdot "Apple Announces iCloud and iWork For iOS" http://apple.slashdot.org/story/11/05/31/192223/apple-announces-icloud-and-iwork-for-ios

    Is the need for such emotive language when talking about Google. Personally I welcome the new competition in the Office field if only Microsoft hadn't abusively corrupted ISO it would be as exciting as browsers are today.

  23. Ironically by tuppe666 · · Score: 2

    In many markets Google has a near monopoly position. Their global smart phone market share is around 80% and in some markets it's even higher. Bundling an office suite in order to leverage their dominant operating system is unlikely to sit well with regulators.

    I sure you were against the inclusion of Microsoft Office crapware with every version of its OS. I personally welcome the EU including a start screen on Desktops. Ignoring that Apple has started to bundle iwork...and Microsoft has started including crippled office with its tablets.. neither of these is available for Android. The reality is though Microsoft Office is the monopoly on Microsofts formats something they secured through buying votes in ISO. This will help stop the current compatibility tax myth.

  24. And every by nashv · · Score: 1

    user of Android 4+ can already get Quickoffice for free through the play store. What's your point?

    --
    Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem.
  25. Google encroaching on MS is very un-ideal by sinij · · Score: 2

    As much as I dislike MS, having Google that is in business of collecting and aggregating information about us ALSO be default office tools provider is even worse.

    How long would it take to have mandatory Google+ integration to use it? Thanks, but no thanks.

  26. It's not the (lack of) keyboard or screen size by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's the functionality. Every mobile office suite falls short with features you'd deem basic.

  27. What happened to Google Docs/Drive? by arielCo · · Score: 1

    Wasn't it supposed to be Google's alternative? Was it too hard to adapt to mobile?

    --
    This post contains no rudeness or derision of any kind. All arguments are friendly. Terms and exclusions may apply.
  28. Re:quickoffice is free and available to any Androi by SuperDre · · Score: 0

    or it's because english isn't my main language (yes, there are people who's first language isn't english).. but you are right, it should have been 'your', i just hadn't reread my post because i was using a touchscreen keyboard on my tablet to post the specfic post and typing and correcting posts on a tablet just sucks balls..

  29. Re:quickoffice is free and available to any Androi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure you can upgrade. If the manufacturer no longer support your device, switch to cyanogenmod android. You can then kick anything 'pre-installed', making lot of room on your device. Then you install the latest versions from google play (or whatever they call android market these days.)

  30. Actually, that's an OEM problem. by MasterOfGoingFaster · · Score: 4, Interesting

    yeah, great, another android fuck-up if you're tablet or phone is pre-loaded with it, you can't update to a newer version unless the manufacturer releases a newer version.. therefore i'm stuck to a very old version of quickoffice on my xoom...

    That's not an Android fuck-up. That's the OEM's problem, and it has nothing to do with Android. I chose Nexus devices (4 and 7) to avoid this, as these are the devices Android was written for. For any non-Nexus device, you depend on the OEM for certain things that may or may not occur. As a Slashdot person, surely you know this, right?

    --
    Place nail here >+
    1. Re:Actually, that's an OEM problem. by SuperDre · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yes it's an android fuckup, for letting OEM's being able to do it in the first place.. the motorolla xoom was the honeycomb developer device, so it was the 'nexus' device in that time, and that's the one that I have and is having the problem..

    2. Re:Actually, that's an OEM problem. by msobkow · · Score: 2

      You mean like HP, Dell, and Lenovo are required to force you to run Windows Update on your box?

      --
      I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    3. Re:Actually, that's an OEM problem. by Nick · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes it's an android fuckup, for letting OEM's being able to do it in the first place.. the motorolla xoom was the honeycomb developer device, so it was the 'nexus' device in that time, and that's the one that I have and is having the problem..

      By your logic it would be a Google fuckup for letting OEMs have full control of what they do with Android which has no technical bearing on merits of Android in itself. BTW, big props to Google for going in the other direction of Apple by letting OEMs do this - I seem to remember this worked out pretty well for MSFT.

      --
      Fuck Ajit Pai
    4. Re:Actually, that's an OEM problem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      As the Xoom was the first official Android tablet, which also introduced 3.0 and was a reasonable counter to the iPad 2, even though it didn't get Nexus in the name, I would say that it does deserve some special recognition... it isn't like one of the 100s of "me too" Android phones.

      That said, mine is starting to feel a bit old.

    5. Re:Actually, that's an OEM problem. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Yes it's an android fuckup, for letting OEM's being able to do it in the first place.

      "Letting"?

      From Wikipedia:

      The source code for Android is available under free and open-source software licenses.

      Am I misunderstanding what that means? How could Android stop OEM's from forking Android? (I'm not an OSS maven, so the question is an honest one).

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    6. Re:Actually, that's an OEM problem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you are a Open Handset Alliance, you are not allowed to fork Android. Expulsion awaits if you do so. If you are not member of Open Handset Alliance, you are not allowed to use the Android trademark and include the app store (and other things) on your phone that runs the Android fork.

      See the ugly truth at http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2013/10/googles-iron-grip-on-android-controlling-open-source-by-any-means-necessary/
      Open source means nothing to Google.

    7. Re:Actually, that's an OEM problem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're the fuckup, I just installed it on a Xoom.

      What are you not telling us? What's the error? Did you root it and not update the Play store?

    8. Re:Actually, that's an OEM problem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think ROMs with certain apps preinstalled or removed can really classify as a "fork".

      If I write a program that installs Ubuntu server and then apt-get installs apps and apt-get removes certain apps, it doesn't mean I am forking Ubuntu.

    9. Re:Actually, that's an OEM problem. by molnarcs · · Score: 2

      yeah, great, another android fuck-up if you're tablet or phone is pre-loaded with it, you can't update to a newer version unless the manufacturer releases a newer version.. therefore i'm stuck to a very old version of quickoffice on my xoom...

      That's not an Android fuck-up. That's the OEM's problem, and it has nothing to do with Android. I chose Nexus devices (4 and 7) to avoid this, as these are the devices Android was written for. For any non-Nexus device, you depend on the OEM for certain things that may or may not occur. As a Slashdot person, surely you know this, right?

      I agree completely, but different users have different priorities. My problem with the Nexus is the lack of choice. I'd rather Google partnered up with different companies to release different models that suit different needs. For example, I don't need a large phone. I use the 4 inch Nexus 2 (first Samsung Nexus after HTC N1) now. I'm a photographer, and I'd love a Nexus with a good camera. I don't carry my d800 and lenses everywhere ;) I'd pay more for it. How much extra a decent camera module & lens would cost? $50? $100 - I'd pay that much more for the Nexsus if it came with decent photo capabilities. Frankly, the cameras in Nexus 3s, 4s and now 5s are not really convincing for me to upgrade. Thus I'm eyeing alternatives, even though I hate the thought of running Android with OEM fluff and worse, not getting the latest upgrades :(

    10. Re: Actually, that's an OEM problem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really really dumb post.

    11. Re:Actually, that's an OEM problem. by intermodal · · Score: 1

      You do understand that as the owners of Motorola Mobility, Google IS the OEM for MM products?

      --
      In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
  31. Not much of an attack by BitZtream · · Score: 1

    Buying and including an Office suit so that you're compatible with one the competitions big products ... not really sure how threatened I'd feel ... in fact, I'd consider myself the winner if people were taking those kind of shots at me ...

    --
    Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    1. Re:Not much of an attack by BlindBear · · Score: 1

      Only Microsoft ( and their boosters ) could call this an attack, heavens to betsy! I feel that Google is just helping their big buddy Microsoft fulfill their claim to make the world a better place to live in, after all, every now and then your average behemoth corporation needs a little help. Let's just hope that Google gives them every thing they deserve, payment in full of course, especially after all the help that Microsoft gave Google with that silly little Android thingy and all those little legal things that kept on popping up....... It's only fair that Microsoft gets back what it has generously given to others.

      --
      I prefer Classic Slashdot.
  32. Re:War between Google and Microsoft getting hotter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Except Apple and Microsoft offered Google to join into their conglomerate, but Google declined and wanted to snatch the patents away without Apple and Microsoft.

  33. Re:quickoffice is free and available to any Androi by CronoCloud · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You can still install the newer version on Google Play if your tablet came installed with the old QuickOffice HD, I just did it on a Dell Streak 7.

  34. Re:quickoffice is free and available to any Androi by X0563511 · · Score: 2

    I don't have a single device that has anything other than a nightly build of Cyanogenmod. I don't have unpopular devices, either.

    --
    For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  35. Re:War between Google and Microsoft getting hotter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Somewhat sad to see when one side of this battle uses product superiority

    That phrase really has no business being in a comment on a story about Quick Office.

    Just saying.

  36. Re:quickoffice is free and available to any Androi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since when does that happen? I had a SGS2 which had several Google Apps pre-loaded and I was able to update all of them when a new version appeared in Google Play. What you're saying is false.

  37. Re:quickoffice is free and available to any Androi by mspohr · · Score: 1

    You could take a minute to, you know, like, look at the Play store (unless you don't have an Android phone and are just ranting to hear yourself scream) and see that this is a free install for any recent Android device. (And you can uninstall it from any Android device also if you don't want it.)
    Looks like 1,000,000+ people have downloaded it.
    I just installed the latest version on an old HTC phone which has been heavily customized by HTC with the "Sense" interface with no problems.
    (I can uninstall it too...)

    --
    I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
  38. Re:quickoffice is free and available to any Androi by SuperDre · · Score: 1

    We'll I can't.. it gives an error (and I'm not the only one), and I cannot deinstall the original one that came with the tablet..

  39. Re:War between Google and Microsoft getting hotter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    Google declined joining a patent troll shell company that is now suing their OEM partners? How terrible of them.

  40. Re:quickoffice is free and available to any Androi by norite · · Score: 3

    That's why you root your android device; in fact it's the first thing you do to it - install remove anything you want...

    --
    -- Fuck Beta
  41. Re: War between Google and Microsoft getting hotte by michaelnz · · Score: 1

    You do realise that Google has been using its Motorola patent portfolio to sue the exact same companies that are suing it, right?
    http://www.fosspatents.com/2013/08/googles-motorola-files-new-german.html?m=1

    Google can't claim to be the good guys here.

  42. Re:quickoffice is free and available to any Androi by SuperDre · · Score: 1

    *sigh*.. If I could uninstall it I would have, it's a common problem (just read some forums).. I have a motorolla xoom tablet.. Yes, QuickOffice is free, I know that too, but before you can install the latest version you need to be able to remove the old one, and that's not possible when QO shipped with your tablet (at least on 'older' devices)..

  43. Re: War between Google and Microsoft getting hotte by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    fosspatents is run by a Microsoft shill. I forgot his name but he admitted to being a shill after he was caught with his pants down.

    I would never ever trust anything on that site again. If you have other sources then please list them. I doubt you'll find much since most patent wars are started by either Apple or Microsoft.

  44. Why should an 'Office' suite or OS cost anything? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Microsoft makes masses of money selling two types of thing that should, TODAY, be free. No-one denies that things cost time and money to create. However, the rule in IT is that, across time, every static function depreciates in value across time, until a point is reached of effectively zero cost.

    Put simply, a task that once had a real cost of HUNDREDS of dollars (like MPEG 1 decoding) eventually ends up costing a fraction of ONE dollar. Who can argue that operating systems and office suites should fall outside this mechanism?

    Of course, companies like Microsoft spend BILLIONS each year rally an army of shills to bulls**t the line that "innovation" in this year's version of their OS or office suite justifies the 150+ dollar price tag, whereas in reality the functionality of the version of either from more than a decade back, on the vastly more powerful hardware of today, would suffice with minimal changes.

    And, part of the depreciation process is how FREE software solutions can replicate even the most 'complex' parts of anything MS sells (and, in reality, FREE software handles complexity vastly better than MS's solutions- which are almost always very poorly coded).

    What we get today is a devolution of usability with the OS and office from Microsoft, with crappy gimmicks sold on the basis of 'high fashion' interfering with the ease with which commonly required functionality is activated and achieved. One expects a MS program circa 2013 to have great difficultly even scrolling down a very large, 'complex' document, now that MS uses dozens of layers of abstracted coding methods, rather than hitting the screen with a well-coded C/C++ application, as would have been the case ten years back.

    Wasting the power of your modern PC has been ESSENTIAL for the continued growth of both Intel and Microsoft. With the rise of low-capacity mobile battery powered devices, this philosophy has had to change, and designers noticed that almost EVERY heavy CPU operation could be moved to the GPU or dedicated hardware blocks- locations where the cost of a given level of calculation does significantly fall EVERY year.

    You think a good OS or office suite should cost you hundreds of dollars every few years for the SAME reason Egyptian mothers of Christian, Jewish or Muslim background think their daughters MUST have significant genital mutilation- because you've heard this lie from every 'social' source around you for so long, you don't even CONCEIVE of the idea of questioning it. You nerds think religious types who cut their kiddies are idiots, but you are just as bad. Most nerds are just as unquestioning about the status quo factors in their own world.

    However, Microsoft and Intel do NOT justify the expense of their platform- but its SUCCESS does. Windows is not inherently good save for the fact that it has become a universal platform. But now the market is moving, and the age of Microsoft and Intel is finally drawing to a close, just as CP/M and the Z80 before it also fell (after a reign that was far shorter, but just as significant).

    Microsoft's last ploy will be to say only "smelly cheapskate idiots, or Apple fashionistas refuse to use expensive MS products", and pay ever more shills to spam this message everywhere. The rest of us will recall that MS's most impressive, responsive and usable version of Office lies long ago in their past.

  45. I, for one, am not happy with the 'update' by Voyager529 · · Score: 3, Informative

    I needed to view a Word document in a hurry. I got a copy of QuickOffice from Amazon when it was a free app-of-the-day last year, but opted to try Google's more recent flavor. Google insisted I logged in, and refused to do anything if I just wanted to use a Word document on my SD card. There was NO reason for this. I, for one, disapprove of this change, regardless of any of the others.

  46. Re:quickoffice is free and available to any Androi by feranick · · Score: 1

    Really? If you go to the play store page for quickoffice, you will see that all that is required for Quickoffice to run is Android 2.2. BTW, I am not talking about the quickoffice viewer that comes with every android, but rather the editor. Check again here:
    https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.quickoffice.android&hl=en

  47. Re:quickoffice is free and available to any Androi by Sun · · Score: 4, Informative

    Your OEM probably changed the signature on the APK they pre-installed.

    You can upgrade a pre-installed APK from Google Play. This is not a problem. Unless, that is, the package name for the new and old APKs is the same, but the signing certificate is not. This is not a bad thing, except when %!@#(*# OEMs re-sign APKs they pre-install.

    I made a living off localizing android systems for the local market, and I always had a bit of a hard time explaining to the clients why I couldn't localize none-core apps (which include the Google Play itself, for which the Hebrew translation seems to have been done by someone quite illiterate).

    Shachar

  48. Re:quickoffice is free and available to any Androi by moronoxyd · · Score: 1

    therefore i'm stuck to a very old version of quickoffice on my xoom...

    What the...?
    You can update the pre-installed version of (almost) any app from the Play Store or by side loading without any problem.

    The first thing that happens when I do a factory reset on an Android device is that the Play Store wants to update half of the pre-installed apps.

  49. Re:quickoffice is free and available to any Androi by moronoxyd · · Score: 1

    But this is not an Android fuck-up, as you claimed, but a Motorola fuck-up, if anything.
    On all 6 of my Android devices (from 4 different makers) I can update pre-installed apps without problem.

    If you really would have to remove the old version on the Xoom to install a new version you should be able to do that by rooting your device. After that you can usually remove pre-installed apps as you can get write access to the system folders.

    The way you worded your original statement is just plain wrong.
    (And don't come with the 'I'm not a native English speaker' excuse. I'm neither.)

  50. Bad news.doc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have to admit this is like watching a fistfight between Adolf Hitler and Iosef Stalin, it's unclear whom to root for when both are the epitomes of pure evil... but either way, this HURTS the rest of us by reducing the motivation for people to adopt ODT format (etc.,) for daily use with WYSIWYG text document editing, when the people can now edit M$ Proprietary DOC format for free.

    This is a Band-aid (TM) fix on a sucking chest-wound. It won't help. No, worse actually, a shaving-nick DOT on a gaping head-wound is more like it. We need to work to wrest control of standards from those who would use them to line their own pockets at our expense, and hold our ability to exchange ideas and documents for ransom. /rant.

  51. Re:quickoffice is free and available to any Androi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You jut need to leave the good ol' USofA and go somwhere civilised then. These are American (carrier) problems.

  52. Re:War between Google and Microsoft getting hotter by jareth-0205 · · Score: 1

    Except Apple and Microsoft offered Google to join into their conglomerate, but Google declined and wanted to snatch the patents away without Apple and Microsoft.

    Problem is, that wouldn't have helped them, because Apple & MS could still go after the manufacturers of Android devices, and Google could do nothing to stop it. Without hardware manufacturers Android doesn't exist, so they had to have their own to use as a defensive shield for their manufacturers.

  53. Microsoft should, take a break by danknight48 · · Score: 1

    Have a KitKat.

    Then, send a critical "security" update out for all office products.
    Change the file structure a little, prevent non-office applications from loading new files.

    Happy to help MS!

  54. Re:quickoffice is free and available to any Androi by andrepd · · Score: 1

    That is wrong. You can update any preinstalled app as if it were a Google Play app. Stop spreading bullshit you shill.

  55. Re:quickoffice is free and available to any Androi by andrepd · · Score: 1

    If you have rooted it, as I assume a /. user would have, there are a million apps to uninstall preinstalled apps, for example: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.jumobile.manager.systemapp&hl=en Just be careful not to uninstall the Phone app or something.

  56. Re:quickoffice is free and available to any Androi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    i aint never went to college.

    That sounds wrong. Shouldn't it be "i aint never went to no college."?

  57. Re:quickoffice is free and available to any Androi by JayRott · · Score: 1

    *sigh*.. If I could uninstall it I would have, it's a common problem (just read some forums).. I have a motorolla xoom tablet.. Yes, QuickOffice is free, I know that too, but before you can install the latest version you need to be able to remove the old one, and that's not possible when QO shipped with your tablet (at least on 'older' devices)..

    Just root the damn thing and remove it with titanium backup or one of the countless root uninstaller apps on Google Play. Rooting a Xoom is pretty trivial, in fact here is an idiot-proof guide: http://androidcommunity.com/motorola-xoom-root-the-easy-way-with-1-click-root-and-overclock-guide-20110331/

  58. Re: War between Google and Microsoft getting hotte by JayRott · · Score: 4, Informative

    fosspatents is run by a Microsoft shill. I forgot his name but he admitted to being a shill after he was caught with his pants down

    Florian Müller would be the name of the particular douche-nozzle in question.

  59. Re:quickoffice is free and available to any Androi by SuperDre · · Score: 1

    Just read some f-ing forums in regard to QO, without rooting you cannot 'update' older versions of QO.. I'm not spreading BS, you are..

  60. Re:quickoffice is free and available to any Androi by SuperDre · · Score: 1

    And THAT's the problem with QO that is shipped with the Xoom..

  61. Re:quickoffice is free and available to any Androi by SuperDre · · Score: 1

    Really? and you don't think I (and other Xoom users) already tried that?

  62. Re:quickoffice is free and available to any Androi by Sun · · Score: 1

    With any rootable device, you can just delete the old APK from the system folder and clear the package cache. Problem solved.

    Shachar

  63. Don't want it... by BoFo · · Score: 1

    By coincidence, I was looking for a better option to read/edit office files on my Galaxy s3. I almost bailed the minute I read that storage was in the Google Cloud. Why in bog's name should I continue to give my personal data to Google? Look, I know there is no privacy on The Internet, but I refuse to give my assent. In any case, I started the install and backed out again when it stated that network access was required. Then I figured, maybe it is only required if I CHOOSE to accept their offer of 15GB of cloud storage. I installed and opened Quickoffice. On the first screen it was asking me to specify the account I would use for Google. Evaluation period over, uninstall. Sewer rat might taste like punkin' pie but I'll never know 'cause I'll never eat the bastard.

  64. Re:quickoffice is free and available to any Androi by mcgrew · · Score: 1

    You're doing better than a lot of native speakers. Since you don't speak natively I'm sure you appreciate the instruction.

  65. Re:quickoffice is free and available to any Androi by SuperDre · · Score: 1

    Yes I do appreciate it.. just like the anonymous above here corrects me for the use of "who's" which should have been "whose", that's one I didn't notice...